indigo gets an exclusive backstage pass to the new series of Peep Show
First fashion shoot of the year: Fit Freshers
indigo, page 13
indigo, pages 4-7
Palatinate
www.palatinate.org.uk Tuesday 30th October 2012 FREE
Durham’s student newspaper since 1948
No. 743
Vice-Chancellor defends foreign donations policy Matt Lee Professor Chris Higgins has defended the University’s acceptance of a donation from a former Kuwaiti Prime Minister accused of corruption. In an exclusive interview with Palatinate at the official opening of the Palatine Centre, the Vice-Chancellor also reiterated his belief that the University’s policy on donations is “transparent” and that all donors are “vetted appropriately.” His comments were in response to a £2.5 million endowment pledged by Nasser al-Mohammed al-Sabah and officially presented to Durham University last month. The former Prime Minister of Kuwait was forced to resign from office eight months after he committed to the endowment in March 2011. His resignation came amidst allegations that his government paid Kuwaiti MPs to support government policies. He was cleared of wrongdoing by a judicial tribunal in May of this year, but only after the Constitutional Court had blocked parliamentary attempts to question him. Professor Higgins dismissed
any controversy that may have accompanied the endowment. “We’re very proud of it [the donation]. It’s enhancing our academic and educational reputation. “We will always consider reviewing a case if there is a problem but people are always innocent until proven guilty.”
“We’re very proud of the donation. It’s enhancing our acadamic reputation.” Professor Chris Higgins
Furthermore, the Vice-Chancellor reaffirmed his belief in the criteria used to judge each donation. “Any money that might cause a conflict of interest, limit academic freedom or come from an illegal source we would reject. “We have very clear guidelines laid down and we’re responsible for making those decisions.” He pointed to a recent donation to
Comment: A summer in Libya - a country renewed?
support his claim that all donations were vetted rigorously. “We had a recent offer of a donation from Durham Cathedral which, on the face of it, has nothing to do with academic freedom. “We couldn’t accept it until it was debated in council… there was an issue, at first, that a legacy gift would restrict academic freedom, in which case we couldn’t accept it.” Additionally, he said that once gifts are pledged to the University, there are obstacles to returning them. “It is very difficult for us to return the money after it’s been donated for legal reasons. We’re legally obliged to take money for our purposes as a charity... which is education and research.” Nevertheless, he went onto say that Durham University would “probably” consider rejecting a donation based on student opinion but that this, again, was dependent on practical considerations. “If there was a big issue of course we would listen very carefully to the students but one of the difficulties is that students come from very different places. continued on page 3
DUCK’s zombie invasion had students running scared on Saturday, and all in the name of charity fundraising. Read your DUCK officer’s column inside, page 6 Photograph: Krystina Warrington
Business: Unleashing Africa’s economic potential
Music: Bastille chat to indigo ahead of their Newcastle debut