Tour of Hayes The Theory and Practice of Change Management

Page 1

Tour of the book and431 Porter et al. (1975) offer a third way, suggesting that an effective route to change is companion website to intervene in ways that simultaneously modify structures, in order to create the Selecting interventions

conditions that will elicit new and desired behaviours, and modify interpersonal processes – to address issues of managerial style, attitudes and the social climate of the organization. This approach employs structural interventions to support intrapersonal and interpersonal learning. Exercises They suggest that structural interventions might include: Change tools

Change management is most effective when the use of These invite you to articulate and critically examine # modifying work structures in order to change how individual employees actually tools and techniques is guided by theory. Throughout your own implicit theories of time change, drawing on your spend most of their 302 Planning and preparing for change the book, a number of carefully selected change tools # modifying whether control structures in order to determine attend to personal experience, that is in a company you what individuals # modifying reward structures orderattended, to24 influence what individuals will do when are presented have worked for, a club or society youinhave Managing change: a process perspective alongside theory to provide change they have choice. what needs to be done managers Identify with some ideas about what might be useful or in your everyday life. They also often ask you to apply While there are no hard-and-fast rules about whether interventions should address in specific circumstances concepts and theories studied in the chapter to this (2003) Once and Kantor et al. (1992) argue that the notion attention of refreezing is not relevant a change objective has been identified, needs to be given to interpersonal processes or structures first, there is a growing body of opinion that organizations operating in turbulent environments. They argue that organizaexperienceintervening to change one without the other is less effective thanforintervening has to be to done to achieve the change. The Awakishi diagram could prove h

tions need to be fluid and adaptable that it would be counterintuitive for them for this purpose (Change tooland 15.1). to be frozen into some given way of functioning. Lewin’s point, however, is that all too often change is short-lived. After a ‘shot in the arm’, the change is not sustained 15.1 Awakishi and lifeChange returns tool to the wayThe it was before. diagram In his view, it is not enough to think of Exercise 24.1 Choice of interventions change in terms of simply reaching a new state, for example achieving a short-term The Awakishi diagram (Newman, 1995) a useful tool to stimulate thinking Review some of the change programmes that have been implemented within your improvement in the level of collaboration in theismarketing department’s meetings. what that needs to be done.forLet us assume the change the closur organization and, with reference to the content of this chapter, critically assess the permanency, He asserted as long as it is that relevant, needs toinvolves be an important to achieve cost savings. Anand individual (or group) could brainstorm choice of interventions. Are you able to identify occasions when inappropriate part ofplant the goal. This state may be brief involve little more than taking stock about what needs to bechange. done toItachieve this goal. The brainstorm interventions were used? Give reasons and suggest interventions than might have before moving on to yet more is, however, important to think inmight terms gen of large number issues requiring attention, which can betogrouped categ been more effective. consolidation in orderofto minimize the danger of slipping back the wayinto things Theeither most important categories provide the main ‘bones’, which connect If you are a full-time student with little work experience, you could were before. spine of thep.skeleton (see Figure 15.1). These could be plant to to be closed, research an organization online, such as the NHS in the UK, or design a miniHendry (1996, 624) testifies to Lewin’s lasting contribution change s inventories andany people. V ‘Scratch research project and interview members of an organization, such management, as yourequipment, univerby noting: account of creating and managing change Using bones prompts, the otherwhich thingsnecessarily that will need to be done sity or a local company, to identify the type of interventions that used tothese andwere the idea that change is aasthree-stage process begins with a and prioritized. Forfar example, needs ’toHowever, happen inasorder to id achieve change, observe whether they were carefully chosen for particular circumprocessidentified of unfreezing will not be below what the surface. Burnes which plant to close, which equipment to dispose of, and which people to stances, and assess whether inappropriate interventions had been used. (2004a) has observed, the strength of Lewin’s contribution to the theory and can then change be given what needs to be done toisactually the practiceAttention of organizational is to when this three-step model viewedclose as part plant, dispose surplus equipment, and group manage the relocation/severan of an integrated theoryofthat includes field theory, dynamics (see Chapter staff. Attention can also given toreport issues2.1 such as stakeholder Summary 16) andsurplus action research (see Chapter 17).be Research presents the resultsma ment, communications and so and on. the three-step model of change. of an empirical test of Lewin’s theory This chapter examined the factors that need to be considered when selecting which Research reports type of intervention to use. Consideration was also given to the factors that can affect decisions regarding the sequencing of interventions in those Dispose of Identify wh Much of the knowledge about the Research report 2.1 Acircumstances test of the validity of Lewin’s three-stepConsolidate model People surplus plant facility to cl inventories where it is necessary to use more than one type of intervention. managementSome of change that is of the factors that need to be considered selecting interventions are:change: An 1 As implementation progresses, change process Ford,when M.W and Greer, B.M. (2006) Profiling

change both.

Criteria Timetable available to managers is practice profiles will display higher levels of ‘movement’ and empirical study of change process patterns, Journal of 1 Diagnosed problem: ‘refreezing’ factors. Applied Behavioral Science, 42(4): 420–46. based. There#is,Where however, a growing Identify who to retain the issue is defined in terms of a need for transformational change, Closure of 2 Change process profiles associated with higher body of research evidence thatsuggest can that the most effective interventions will be those Burke and Litwin one plant degrees of implementationHow? success will display Theory Supporters When? that in aresome targeted at changing system-wide elements such as mission and stratcomplement, and cases higher levels of unfreezing, movement and This study compared profiles of activity at different What? Blockers egy, leadership and culture. Who? refreezing factors than change process profiles stages of a change to investigate the validity of challenge, this craft-based expertise. # Where the issue is defined in terms of a need for incremental change (or associated with lower degrees of success. Identify Lewin’s three-phase model. Lewin’s model implies that Throughout the book, there fine-tuning), theare most effective interventions may be those that address Communications ? activities relating to unfreezing should be observable This second hypothesis relates to the levels ofstakeholders elements that, if changed, might have a more localized impact in terms of frequent references to research before activities relating to movement and refreezing. unfreezing-moving-refreezing activity associated with Unfreezing to destabilize the status quo needs to studies, but occasionally selected the degree of implementation success. Lewin’s theory Figure 15.1 Using the Awakishi as a change plant closure occur first otherwise the organization will be poorly doesdiagram not suggest that anytool: of the three phases will studies are presented in research prepared for change. Movement requires at least dominate, for example although refreezing occurs late reports. These give a flavour of some some old ways of doing things to be discarded in in the change process, it is just as important as Develop annew implementation plan favour of new behaviours. It is only after these of this research-based knowledge, unfreezing, so it follows that implementation success behaviours have been established that refreezing will will be associated with more intense use of all change how research is contributing to factors at will influence the change facilitate the stabilization of the Two organization a new process factors. plan: our knowledge about change equilibrium. Ford and Greer argue that if such a 1 Change participants’ perceptions of the proposed change in terms of its progression or sequence exists, then intensity levels of Method management and different research and the likelihood that it will happen. factors linked to each of the three stages of Lewin’s change, Ford and , whe methods that can be used 2 Clarity of the desiredAfter endstudying state –conceptualizations is the change a of‘blueprint change’

model should change as implementation proceeds. Greer developed a set of change process factors desired end state is known, or an emergent change, where the that desired en They make two hypotheses: could be linked to Lewin’s three phases:

is, as yet, unknown?

xviii


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Tour of Hayes The Theory and Practice of Change Management by Macmillan International Higher Education - Issuu