Contemporary Art in Dubai by Marcelo Lima

PANOPTIKON

On Contemporary Visual Culture

PANOPTIKON PAPERS SERIES

Building Cultural Capital: Contemporary Art in Dubai and the African Art Circuit by

J.R. Osborn, Ph.D.

Department of Visual Communication American University in Dubai w.h.osborn@gmail.com and

Katy Chang, Director

Cultural Capital: Finding Art in Dubai Mer-chan Productions

2009

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2, September 2009

PANOPTIKON - On Contemporary Visual Culture ISSN 1996-0344

www.panoptikon.net Editor: Marcelo Guimaraes Lima thepanoptikon@gmail.com PANOPTIKON PAPERS SERIES, May 2009 text copyright ÂŠ J.R. Osborn and Katy Chang, 2009

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2 September, 2009

Building Cultural Capital: Contemporary Art in Dubai and the African Art Circuit by J.R. Osborn, Ph.D. Department of Visual Communication American University in Dubai w.h.osborn@gmail.com and Katy Chang, Director Cultural Capital: Finding Art in Dubai Mer-chan Productions katychang@mer-chan.com

Paper prepared for the Revisiting Modernization Conference Thematic Area 2: Emerging Circuits of African Art Production and Exhibition. University of Ghana, Legon July 27-31, 2009

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2, September 2009

Building Cultural Capital: Contemporary Art in Dubai and the African Art Circuit by J.R. Osborn and Katy Chang A professor of architecture in Abu Dhabi asked his students: “The UAE is spending all this money and importing the Louvre. Why not use that money to support local artists and, in the long run, you will build your own Louvre.” To which his student responded: “Yes, that may be a good idea . . . but it takes too much time” (Lima 2009). The United Arab Emirates is currently attempting to “modernize” within the shortest time possible. Both Dubai and Abu Dhabi can afford all the components of modernization (the cities, the buildings, the infrastructure, the media, the museums, the art, etc.) except the historical time required for modernization. Although the expected results of this process are commonly compared with the commercial and industrial centers of Europe, America, and Asia, they may also be placed alongside African history, in which a similar timeframe has produced novel interpretations of contemporaneity and globalization. Africa, like the Middle East, is traversing a compressed time out of which its hopes to create a future (Njami 2005: 14). The historical linkages of Africa and the Middle East offer an interesting point of intersection for this endeavor.

With its bold challenge to become a center of global finance, media, and culture, Dubai is redrawing the map of commercial and artistic exchange. This endeavor involves the decentering of European and American markets, with the emerging Dubai art market as a key example. A circuit of African-Middle Eastern exchange could significantly rewrite the modernization of art as well as the critical and aesthetic categories of modernism. Contemporary African art offers a compelling venue for the reimagination of history, tradition, and modernity (Jewsiewicki 1991; Jules-Rosette 1984; Kasfir 1999); and Simon Njami (2005) has specifically noted how a trans-Arab exhibit of contemporary art would complement Africa Remix. African-Middle Eastern dialogue remixes the history of modernity, as long as both sides are willing to take the time. African visions PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2 September, 2009

of the contemporary condition resonate with the compressed time of Dubai’s modernization, and African artists may approach Dubai as a new stage from which to address global audiences. But this shimmering vision of the future, like much of Dubai, is still under construction.

Contemporary Art in the UAE: Institutions without Dialogue

In 1989, the Jordanian Royal Society of Fine Arts and the Islamic Arts Foundation of the United Kingdom curated “Contemporary Art from the Islamic World.” The exhibit traveled from London to Amman in the hope of highlighting “a new dimension in the collaboration between East and West” (Ali 1989: x). Whereas artists from countries such as Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Palestine, Syria, Sudan, Turkey, and Yemen merited individual catalog essays, the UAE was addressed en masse with the other countries of the Gulf Cooperative Council (GCC): Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia. A brief five-page essay (Ali 1989: 46-50) noted that contemporary art across the GCC region was still very much in development. Of the 207 participating artists, only sixteen represented the GCC. The exhibit did not include a single artist from the UAE. With the sole exception of the United Arab Emirates, every GCC member country contributed at least one artist’s work. At the turn of the century, acknowledgement of contemporary art was virtually nonexistent in the UAE.

More recently, the country has pursued dramatic development in hopes of becoming both a regional and global center of media, and culture. The Dubai government built “Dubai Media City” and “Dubai Internet City” to function as regional hubs for major broadcast and technology companies. The Dubai media market now challenges the traditional Arabic centers of Egypt and Lebanon for regional supremacy. Similarly massive economic investments have been directed toward the trappings of artistic and cultural institutions, such as the proposed branches of the Guggenheim and the Louvre museums in Abu Dhabi. The design of these buildings generated an enormous amount of publicity although a grain of sand is yet to be lifted in their construction. The government-monitored media presents the idea as if it were already a reality, and the mere

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2, September 2009

proposal of such grand projects justifies their imagined contributions. Adopting a mantra of “If you build it, they will come,” UAE development plans assume that once grand museums, international art fairs, expensive art prizes, and luxury apartments are established, a vibrant community of local artists, collectors, and critics will quickly follow. As centers of art and culture, both Abu Dhabi and Dubai place the simulacra of the cart (a relevance in the international art world) before the local horses of collectors, artworks, venues, and art communities.

Alongside the Abu Dhabi museums, the Art Dubai fair and the Sharjah Biennial are also heavily investing in contemporary art. The first is primarily market driven, while the latter maintains a more curatorial focus. But like the Abu Dhabi museums, these institutions reach toward Europe and America as sources of innovation rather than creating new centers or new coalitions of contemporary art. Although Art Dubai along with its satellite art fairs brought over a billion dollars to the region, the majority of its seventy exhibitors were European or American galleries. Approximately one third of the stalls represented local and regional galleries, and a few Asian galleries rounded out the total. Art Dubai inaugurated the Abraaj Capital Art Prize in 2009 with much fanfare. The Prize, which is championed as the world’s largest monetary art prize, recognizes innovative collaborations between international curators and artists working in the Middle East, North Africa and South Asia (the MENASA Region). The three winning entries collected over $1 million each in prize money. Each of these prizes highlighted the collaboration of a European gallerist and a Middle Eastern artist they had “found.”

In comparison to the monetary glitz of Art Dubai, the Sharjah Biennial is an international exhibit sponsored by the Sharjah Art Museum. The Emirate’s Biennial began in 1993, with 2009 being its ninth iteration. The event’s museum sponsorship affords a greater degree of artistic experimentation than the market-driven Dubai art fair, and it boasts a wide variety of media, conceptual pieces, and site-specific installations. In previous years, the Sharjah Biennial directly followed Art Dubai. This allowed art enthusiasts to attend both events in succession. A rich interplay arose from such a major regional exhibition following on the heels of a thriving Art Dubai. The fair helped establish a collector’s market in

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2 September, 2009

the UAE, and the Biennial pointed the way toward a more experimental artistic future.

In 2009, however, the artistic vision of the UAE appeared to falter. The Sharjah Biennial and Art Dubai coincided, as a larger initiative known as Contemparabia organized “Gulf Art Week 2009.” This multinational event unfolded over six days with happenings in Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah, and Doha, Qatar. Media coverage was typically effusive and championed the event as a bold initiative, but the distance between sites, difficulties of transportation, and scheduling conflicts tended to isolate venues rather than connect them. Attempting to harness a surging interest in Middle Eastern contemporary art, the overlapping schedules intended to pour Art Dubai’s increased attendance into the Biennial. But it instead resulted in a competition for resources and visitors. Most visitors directed their attention to one site rather than traversing the region. Consequently, the expected dialogue connecting art marketing, curatorial exhibition, and museum planning failed to materialize. Instead, the UAE and the region appeared struggling to find an artistic voice. This confusion was mirrored during the Venice Biennale in June 2009, where both the UAE Ministry of Culture and the Abu Dhabi Authority on Culture and Heritage hosted competing pavilions (Al Qassemi 2009). Each pavilion claimed the national banner of the UAE and featured many of the same artists. This inadvertent rivalry puzzled a number of visitors and reinforced a chaotic vision of art in the UAE. This was the UAE’s first year at the Venice Biennale, and the dueling pavilions highlighted the country’s financial ability to purchase multiple seats at the table rather than champion local artists and regional galleries as rising stars of contemporary art.

The Missing Modernism of Contemporary Art in Dubai

Cultural Capital: FindingArt in Dubai is a feature-length documentary currently in production. The film has conducted interviews with over fifty Dubai-based artists, gallerists, curators, and scholars in search of the city’s artistic pulse. Although the growth of contemporary art in Dubai strikes an overall positive chord, interviewees lamented a lack of local critics and the failure of

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2, September 2009

venues to inspire critical dialogue and engagement. As the contemporary art community in the UAE deals with logistical issues of event planning and coordination, the negotiation of venues and scheduling distracts from the need for critical commentary. Many gallerists also comment that the educational basis for art appreciation is lacking. The unflattering label of “decorative” was frequently applied to describe local artistic preferences. The Dubai art scene privileges a connoisseurship of expensive collection and privileged display rather than aesthetic interaction with the city, the community, the environment, or broader issues of social and political concern.

The denunciation of “decorative” art foregrounds an ideological appreciation of art that differentiates the cultural and artistic position of modernism from the infrastructural technologies of modernization. For proponents of critical engagement rather than decoration, the cultivation of artistic modernism offers yet another outward marker of the UAE’s attempted modernization. In this light, the number of art galleries is comparable to the development of highways or the number of regional internet portals. But the ideals of aesthetic modernism cannot be easily measured with quantifiable markers of economic and technological development. Moreover, the modernist dispersal of decoration as a secondary function reflects a specifically European history of art. In this history, modern tendencies stress a critical reassessment of the past and its artistic products, preoccupation with the demands of artistic media, an experimentation with that media, originality of presentation, the rejection of established hierarchies (both social and consumerist), and the autonomy of art as a neutral sphere of critical and aesthetic discourse (Adorno 1997; Harrison 1996). Although an environment of postmodern concurrence has replaced the teleology of European modernization, the postmodern continues to reference the modern, and traits of modernism remain markers of a vibrant artistic community. Contemporary art, with is multiple messages and interpretations, positions aesthetic modernism as the sign of artistic modernization in much the same way that capitalism, media networks, and sophisticated technology become signs of economic and industrial modernization. Contemporary art builds upon the modernist assumptions of intentional deployment of aesthetic media and the creative reworking of traditional media as a premise of artistic practice. Critical deployment of artistic forms imbues the artistic presentation of contemporary experience with aesthetic and cultural value. The

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2 September, 2009

autonomous function of art positions it as both recorder and commentator on that experience.

The Dubai art community is currently negotiating whether tacit acknowledgment of this ideological modernism is truly a prerequisite for contemporary art. Dubai certainly does not question the ideal of modernization. Indeed, it vigorously embraces a modernization of its own terms, where “modern” is conveniently reified into an availability of luxury goods, a thriving leisure class, and a vibrant consumer economy. In the cash-based lingua franca of Dubai, modernization is readily available as long as one can afford it. Everything becomes subject to its exchange value. The idea of art as a commodity is therefore not problematic. The problem lies instead with the perceived value of that commodity. With the global recession and a weakening economy, art can no longer afford to remain merely a status symbol of financial surplus. In order to stay viable, the Dubai art scene must cultivate an appreciation of art that is more than decorative. The challenge of art in Dubai faces a particularly postmodern dilemma: how can art be elevated to the position of a Louis Vuitton handbag (Lopardo 2009)?

The enthusiastic adoption of modern materialism, separated from the historical and social struggles that produced the material infatuation, highlights perhaps the trickiest of postmodern quandarys: what are the cultural implications of modernization—and, for that matter, postmodernization—in a society that has not embraced modernism? While the UAE eagerly adopts a consumerist society, the modernist ideals that question tradition, champion the novel, and embrace social experimentation, all of which arose hand in hand with consumerism, remain foreign. As an autonomous realm, contemporary art offers a potential site in which these critical visions might converge with material marketing. The modernist tendency to reexamine tradition and suggest aesthetic alternatives (“primitive,” “modern,” and “remixed”) can draw upon Dubai’s diverse population, 80% of which are expatriates. Although expatriate and local artists respond to a common urban landscape, they bring with them a variety of traditions, cultural forms, and media.

But Dubai’s social and ethnic rifts are particularly noticeable in the art world. Even the term “Dubai artist” remains contentious.

Despite large expatriate communities, the

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2, September 2009

term may only refer to Arab Emirati artists. Or it may apply to anyone practicing within the Emirate, regardless of nationality or origin. The UAE remains a strongly hierarchical society with significant ethnic, gender, and class divisions. Contributions of south Asian workers in building the infrastructure of modernization are therefore perceived in a widely dimmer light than the cultural initiatives of European and American consultants. Consequently, minor works by European, American, and Persian artists present a cache of validity that bolsters their attractiveness to Dubai-based collectors. This trumps the autonomy of art, in which experimentation with media or the innovative construction of a message serves as a marker of value. In the current Dubai market, the origin of an artwork—whether Emirati, European, Indian, or Persian—largely determines its exhibition and exchange value.

The lack of African artistic representation in the Dubai market highlights this complex cultural maneuvering. Bo Tasle d’Heliand spent a number of years studying art in the workshops of Kenya, and has recently relocated to Dubai as an artist in residence. His current project “Extraction narrative; coordinates: 1°47’N, 36°47’E” combines Google satellite imagery with a record of his time spent with the Turkana. After struggling to find an African presence in the Dubai art scene, d’Heliand discovered that African artwork, as well as work perceived as addressing African themes, is much more difficult to display in Dubai than elsewhere. Whereas European and American museums and galleries have a niche for African art, both traditional and contemporary, Middle Eastern collectors and audiences seem to appreciate neither the traditions nor their creative expropriation in contemporary settings (d’Heliand 2009). The local preference for “decorative” pieces further weakens the appeal of experimental works, especially those that challenge the social hierarchy or remix artistic traditions. If they choose to present work that critically engages their audiences, gallery owners must make a two-fold argument: (1) That the national origin and decorative display of artworks are not the sole markers of value and (2) that a remixing of tradition is as important to the future vision of Dubai as the fetishization of Europe.

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2 September, 2009

Artistic Models of Contemporaneity

Dubai specifically, and the Middle East more generally, are in dire need of new languages to discuss modernity. Contemporary art has a significant role to play in these discussions. The autonomy of art provides a laboratory for presenting, displaying, and sharing alternative visions of the future.

Numerous commentators on African art have noted how the artistic

laboratory short-circuits the historical time of modernism (Jewsiewicki 1993; Kasfir 1999). The critical experiments of contemporary art draw upon all available resources: forms, media, and traditions. They remix and re-envision the contemporary environment without requiring the recreation of histories and processes that produced this environment. When an artistic display strikes a chord, it justifies the time (or the lack of time) required for its production. The process of production is as much a critique as the results are aesthetic.

Contemporary African artistic has located a number of new languages in the visual and performative products of the continent. In explaining the need for Africa Remix, Simon Njami stated that African artists reached a new plateau in the examination, representation, and remixing of contemporaneity: “Artists have no need to prove anything through their work. They are no longer essentially ethnic, though no-one can disown their roots, they are aesthetic and political” (Njami 2005: 21). This third wave of African art was preceded by two stages, which mirror the responses to tradition present in contemporary Middle Eastern art: first, a celebration of African artistic roots and a subsequent period of denial in which the media and forms of European practice were adopted with vigor (ibid.). The third stage of Africa Remix synthesizes the African thesis and the European antithesis in proper Hegelian fashion. It moves discussion away from the origin of the art and into the realm of the contemporary. Today’s artistic quest, according to Njami, is existential. Contemporary art explores the current condition in all its ramifications, mutations, and differences. There may be no global definition of the contemporary condition, but its questions and responses overlap both geographic and artistic boundaries.

For Njami, the “Chaos” of African art has “metamorphosized” into a critical commentary.

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2, September 2009

The art of Africa Remix refashions itself in a dialectical response to tradition and employs artistic media to experiment with and explore the contemporary condition: “Today’s Africa is inevitably the illustration of the cultural syncretism underlying all of contemporaneity” (Njami 2005: 15). In particular, scholars such as Bogumil Jewsiewicki (1991; 1993), Johannes Fabian (1996), and Bennetta Jules-Rosette (2006) have explored Congolese popular painting as an incredbly rich field of symbolic and critical dialogue. Criticisms of history, modernity, and the contemporary condition are re-presented by artists and transposed into a modeling system of hidden messages and visual codes (Jules-Rosette 1987: 96). Popular painting neither eschews modernity nor provides a viable alternative. Instead, it “explores modernity, tracks it down everywhere, examines it, critiques it, caricatures it in an effort to capture its formula and key, to possess it” (Jewsiewicki 1993: 790). In decoding these messages, viewers similarly attempt to capture a formula. They follow the artists to arrive at their own critical assessment and self-reflection. Popular paintings perform not only a decorative role, but also a dialogical one. They do not simply display scenes for a viewer; they engage a viewer. The frame of artistic display becomes a communicative, symbolic, and aesthetic practice in which messages of tradition, politics, value, and experience are negotiated before the viewer’s eyes.

A similar aesthetic shift is currently occurring in the Arab world and the Middle East. The realm of contemporary calligraphic art is one area in which Middle Eastern artists are vibrantly rewriting tradition (Ali 1997). A number of recent studies and exhibitions have explored the transformation of theArabic letter from a formal construct of a calligraphic tradition to an expressive form and a symbolic image in contemporary aesthetics (Shabout 2007; Porter and Eigner 2008; Kreamer, et. al 2007). Contemporary calligraphic works directly address the tradition of Islamic art, with its interplay of decorative and communicative functions. But the remixing of the written word also strikes a deeper chord in the examination of Middle Eastern modernity. The linguistic modernization of Arabic is an incredibly delicate and complex issue (Shabout 1999; Haeri 2003: 73-74). An artistic exploration of language can highlight these issues in ways that other artistic traditions may not. Contemporary calligraphic art therefore introduces both an aesthetic and a linguistic framework for reassessing Arabic tradition. As these visions gain value as a

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2 September, 2009

decorative art, their underling critique sets the stage for a wider embrace of modernist aesthetics.

Roberto Lopardo, a practicing artist and Chair of the Visual Communication Department at the American University in Dubai, has noticed a significant rise in the reflexivity of regional art and design over the past five years. In 2007, Lopardo co-curated the first “Basically Human” exhibit and a second iteration of the same theme is currently on display in New York. The title derives from the products of the first exhibit, which emphasized issues of identity as young Middle Eastern artists struggled to find their own voice. In the current show, however, Lopardo noted that identity concerns are no longer the primary motif. Instead, artists are beginning to experiment with their chosen form as a means of critical commentary and self-expression. The dialogue between artist and viewer has become a discourse of aesthetics and politics rather than a decorative display or an argument of self-justification. Dubai-based artists are “moving out of the studio and into the space that surrounds them” as art provides a medium through which to introduce novel discussions and engage the wider community. Alongside the imported handbags of Louis Vuitton and the construction of the world’s grandest structures, “contemporary art is increasingly becoming a partner in Dubai’s changes, rather than just an observer.”

Revisiting Modernism: The Importance of An African-Middle Eastern Exchange Dubai continues to emerge as a center of artistic production and exchange. Initially fueled by financial investment, its cultural base has been strengthened by a cosmopolitan population, an increasingly educated workforce, and a high percentage of design workers. The past five years have seen a boom in the opening of galleries and exhibition halls. In 2005, the city had less than five exhibit halls. It now has over thirty galleries, as well as numerous art organizations, studio spaces, art education centers, and the region’s signature collector event: Art Dubai. Although the recent global economic downturn has slowed development throughout the UAE, the number of galleries has reached a tipping point where they are ensured of continued dialogue and success. Kouroush Nouri (2009), the owner of the Dubai-based gallery Carbon 12, sees the downturn as a rich opportunity for local art. Tighter budgets may beneficially trim some of the excess

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2, September 2009

of the Dubai art scene and firmly establish a regional focus on curatorial and artistic quality.

The current round of questioning is therefore no longer whether contemporary art will arrive in the UAE, but what form that art will take. How will local art revisit the question of modernity? More importantly, can Dubai emerge as a cultural center of its own or will it remain a satellite to European and American innovations? Can discourses of modernism and the critical reassessment of artistic forms be revised in such a way that they do not necessarily flow through the metropoles of Europe? These questions are especially relevant to the display and distribution of contemporary art, both in the opening of new marketing channels and in the sharing of artistic visions with new audiences. The question of artistic modernism, as opposed to the infrastructural question of modernity uncovers a variety of artistic, performative, and aesthetic spaces that hide within and among the multiple modernities that mirror European art history.

Both African and Middle Eastern artists are similarly striving to catapult themselves from local shows onto the stages of Paris, London, Berlin, and New York. Global artists compete for the limited gallery space of European and American venues. Consequently, the artistic circuit becomes congested as a one-way track, while alternative circuits of transcontinental exchange and dialogue break down. With the UAEâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s excessive spending and investment in modernization, these relations are beginning to drift. European-based artists have recently begun to eye Dubai as a new market. As a stream of artists from the Middle East, Africa, and elsewhere flow into Europe, the overflow spills back into the Middle East. But just as art may short circuit the historical time of modernization, the exchange of art may usefully short-circuit the geographic marketing streams contemporary art. The resurgence of movement along premodern routesâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;such as the circulation of artists, art works, and artistic forms from Africa to the Middle East and vice versaâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;may reawaken the critical of dialogue of modernism. This new modernism might bypass the question of how emerging artists can acquire seats at the European table. It produces, instead, an alternative feast in which Europe is not the primary chef.

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2 September, 2009

References Adorno, Theodor. 1997. Aesthetic Theory. Translated by Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Ali, Wijdan. 1989. Contemporary Art from the Muslim World. London: Scorpion Publishing Ltd. — 1997. Modern Islamic Art: Development and Continuity. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. Al Qassemi, Sultan Sooud. 2009. “UAE’s Oneness.” In The Khaleej Times (June 13, 2009). D’Heiland, Bo Tasle. 2009. Interview with authors. March 14, 2009. Dubai, UAE. Haeri, Niloofar. 2003. Sacred Language, Ordinary People: Dilemmas of Culture and Politics in Egypt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Charles, Harrison. 1996. “Modernism.” In Critical Terms for Art History, edited by Robert Nelson and Richard Shiff, pp. 142-155. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Fabian, Johannes. 1996. Remembering the Present: Painting and Popular History in Zaire. Berkeley: University of California Press. Jewsiewicki, Bogumil. 1991. “Painting in Zaire: From the Invention of the West to the Representation of Social Self.” In Vogel, Susan, ed., Africa Explores: Twentieth Century African Art, pp. 130-151. New York: Center for African Art. — 1993. “Chéri Samba and the Postcolonial Reinvention of Modernity.” Callaloo, Volume 16 (4): 772-795. — 1995. Chéri Samba: The Hybridity of Art. Québec: Galérie Amrad African Art Publications. Jules-Rosette, Benetta. 1984. The Messages of Tourist Art: An African Semiotic System in Comparative Perspective. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation. — 1987. “Rethinking the Popular Arts in Africa: Problems of Interpretation.” African Studies Review, Volume 30 (3): 91-97. — 2006. “Through a Glass Darkly: Bogumil Jewsiewicki and the Anthropology of African Art.” Paper presented at the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Jose, November 15-19, 2006. Kasfir, Sidney L. 1999 Contemporary African Art. New York: Thames and Hudson, Inc. Lima, Marcelo. 2009. Interview with authors. February 26, 2009. Dubai, UAE. Lopardo, Roberto. 2009. Interview with authors. February 26, 2009. Dubai, UAE. Kreamer, Christine Mullen, Mary Nooter Roberts, Elizabeth Harney, and Allyson Purpura, editors. 2007. Inscribing Meaning: Writing and Graphic Systems in Africa. Milan: Five Continents Editions. Njami, Simon, ed. 2005. Africa Remix: Contemporary Art of a Continent. London: Hatje Cantz Publishers. PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2, September 2009

Nouri, Kouroush. 2009. Interview with authors. February 4, 2009. Dubai, UAE. Porter, Venetia and Saeb Eigner. 2008. “Word into Art: Artists of the Modern Middle East. Dubai 2008” London: The British Museum Press. Preziozi, Donald. 1996. “Collecting/Museums.” In Critical Terms for Art History, edited by Robert Nelson and Richard Shiff, pp. 281-291. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Shabout, Nada M. 1999. “Modern Arab Art and the Metamorphosis of the Arabic Letter.” Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Texas at Arlington. — 2007. Modern Arab Art: Formation of Arab Aesthetics. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

PANOPTIKON PAPERS 2 September, 2009