GROWING WITHOUT SCHOOLING
6 The label or address on your GWS (or envelope) will have on it a symbo1 1i ke 1 06, 3 12, etc .. The second numeral is the number of the last issue of your sub scripti~If you like GWS, as we hope you do, please renew. You may renew for one year, two, or three. The latter will save you money and help us. Many thanks. A reader from Florida, who is teaching her two children at home, writes, "As far as neigh bors or strangers are concerned everyone has thought it great that K and L are home and that we're working and learning together. " A new subscriber writes that she saw GWS (or something about GWS) on the bulletin board of the children's section of her public library. Other readers might see whether their library wou l d post GWS on one or more of their bul letin boards. Or, subscribers might take out an extra sub for their library - though it might be a good idea to show GWS to the librarian first, and ask if they would like to have a sub. The group subscription rec ord has moved to Temple, ME, where readers have taken out a 16X sub. Donnelly/Colt, Box 271, New Vernon, NJ 07976, sells a number of bumper stickers and buttons, mostly on anti-nuclear themes. But the button I like best (50¢, 15¢ ea. for 20 or more) just says "QUESTION AUTHORITY." When ordering books from us, please make checks out to Holt Associates, Inc. This will save us the work of transferring the money from the GWS account. Post age on all orders, 30¢ for first book, 15¢ each additional book.
ing the children, aged 8 and 10, at home. In their two- day trial, the couple maintained that public schools were a corrupting influ ence on children and said the ed ucation provided by Mrs. Palmer, who has had one year of college, was adequate. Palmer is a custo di an J.D. the Deer Ri ver school system. TEd. note - italics mine) EQUIVALENT
Friends of ours live in a rich suburb with "good" public school system. Last winter one of their boys broke his leg and had to wear a huge cast, which made it impractical to send him to school. The family (not unschool ers) told the school they wanted to be sure the boy kept up with his class. The school said, no problem, we'll send around a tu tor, which they did, every week for an hour and a half. It was enou9h.-- - - - - EINSTEIN SAID
"It is, in fact, nothing short of a miracle that the mod ern methods of instruction have not yet entirely strangled the holy curiosity of inquiry; for this delicate little plant, aside from stimulation, stands mainly in need of freedom; with out this it goes to wrack and ruin without fail. It is a very grave mistake to think that the enjoyment of seeing and search ing can be promoted by means of coercion and a sense of duty. To the contrary, I believe that it would be possible to rob even a healthy beast of prey of its vo raciousness, if it were possible, with the aid of a whip, to force the beast to devour continuously, even when not hungry, especially if the food, handed out under such coercion, were to be select ed accordi ngly . " FROM A PARENT
A parent (from MO) writes, in part:
"... I have found your news letter increasingly interesting and valuable. As I wrote to you about a year ago, I wi 11 not be sending my children to school (the oldest, now five, would nor mally be entering Kindergarten NEWS ITEM this September). He has been reading now for about a year. I A friend sent a clipping would not have believed anyone from the New York ~ News, May who told me a child could make 28, 1978. It may be worth noting the kind of progress D has made. that the NEWS is a popular tab He is interested in Space Travel loid, generally more Right than and Astronomy and we have made Left in politics and aimed at the available to him all TTteratUre "man in the street." The story on the sUbje1t wecould find. reads, in full: TEd. italics Hegobblesltup at incredible speed and begs for SCHOOL'S OUT FOR FAMILY more. He reads books about the planets and can discuss intelli Grand Rapids, Minn . (AP) - gently the effects of gravity on An Itasca County ~ has found a the various planets and moons Deer River couple innocent of (e.g. that the moon has no air violating the state's mandatory because it has insufficient grav school attendance law in refusing ity to hold the air, and that on to send their two children to Jupiter he would be squashed public schools. flat). Needless to say we are de The jury agreed Friday with lighted, and more convinced than Joseph Palmer's argument that his ever that th is is the way to go." wife, Ann, was capable of teach -
Tx for good letter. D and others who share these interests might want to read (if they are still in print) a number of sci ence fiction novels by Hal Clem ent (one title I remember is A MISSION OF GRAVITY), all of them about what happens when living creatures from one kind of planet try to explore a very different kind of planet. In one, a group of aliens from a planet much hotter than Earth land here, and the story is about how they try to deal with our (to them) in credible cold. Worth looking up. Before long, of course, it will be possible to show D (and other children like him) how they can look up and find for them selves literature on whatever in terests them, and ask others the questions their parents can't answer. THE CHILD TAKERS
From the Juvenile Rights section of the 1977 report of the ACLU: "In the past year, the ACLU's Juvenile Rights Project secured a major victory in its struggle to prevent the state from arbitrarily and unnecessari ly separating children from their parents. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upheld a lower court decision forbidding the state of Iowa from using its parental termination statute to sever the relationship between Charles and Darlene Alsa ger and four of their children. The appeals court ruled that the state cannot 'terminate' pa rents without proving that they are harming their children in substantial and serious ways. For the first time a court recognized that there must be a more compel ling reason for separating famil ies than the state's assertion that it is 'in the best interests of the child.' Relying on the Alsager de cision, the ACLU then challenged a Virginia statute which author ized the temporary separation of children from their families in 'emergency' situations. The case, Ives ~ Jones, was successfully settled, and as a consequence the Virginia law was changed. No longer may children be withheld
even temporarily from their pa
rents unless clear and substan tial danger to the child is shown. Moreover, parents whose children have been taken under a so-called emergency are entitled to an immediate hearing at which they may have counsel and other due process rights. The Alsager decision also prompted a federal court in Ala bama to rule that the state's ne glect statute was unconstitution al because of vagueness and amor phous ~efi~itions of 'child ne glect .... Of all the threats that schools make to unschoolers, the most terrifying is the threat to take their children away. The de cisions cited in the ACLU report suggest that, in some states at least, the courts may not allow the schools to carry out that threat. But of course this de-
pends on whether these courts would rule that unschooling children was harming them "in substantial and serious ways," or constituting a "clear and sub stantial danger" to them. In the politically so-called "conserva tive" states cited, the courts might so decide; what they are refusing to allow is the state taking children away from parents on what might be called psycho logical grounds i.e. because (as in the Alsager case) the parents had low I.Q.s. I suspect that for some time to come we will not be able to get the ACLU or other ·civil lib erties organizations to oppose compulsory schooling on Constitu tional grounds. But we might be able to get these organizations and/ or their state and local branches to say that unschooling children ought not to be grounds for the state to take them away from their parents. This in it self would be an important step. Let's look further into this. Do tell us what you find out. GOOD NEWS FROM VT.
Catherine Lowther, R.D.2, Hardwick, Vt. 05843, wrote us, in part: "I am sorry to hear that so many people are having such a hard time taking their kids out of school. I thought you might like to balance the scales a little with a positive story. I never sent my kids to school. They are 9 and 7 and I have always taught them at home. I have been approved by the State every year, the local au thorities have been friendly, supportive, and even enthusias tic. The local school board has bought all our books and materi als, to be returned to them when we are finished with them. I noticed in GWS #4 you said that the burden to prove that a program is not equivalent to pub lic school should rest with the state. In Vt. it does. [State Su preme Court decision.] I also know three other fam ilies in Vt. who have taken their
kids out of school without har
assment. "
Along with the letter, C.L.
sent a copy of Vermont state law. Title 16, V.S.A., Section ll21(b) as amended Mar. 3D, 1967, reads as foll ows: "Attendance ~ chil dren of school ~ reguired a) A person having the con trol of a child between the ages of seven and sixteen years shall cause such child to attend a pub lic school continually for the full number of days for which such school is held, unless such child is mentally or physically unable to attend; or is other wise being furnished with equiv alent education ...
b) The determination of
equivalency referred to in sub
section (al of this section shall
be made by the State Department of Education and certified to the school directors." (Ed. note - I take it that school directors are