2.1: Country/Economy Profiles
Kazakhstan Key indicators, 2011
GDP (PPP) per capita (int’l $), 1990–2011
Population (millions) ........................................ 16.4 GDP (US$ billions) ........................................ 178.3 GDP per capita (US$) ................................. 10,694 GDP (PPP) as share (%) of world total ............ 0.28
Kazakhstan
15,000
Commonwealth of Independent States
12,000 9,000 6,000 3,000
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
The Global Competitiveness Index Rank (out of 144)
Stage of development
Score (1–7)
GCI 2012–2013 ...................................................... 51 ..... 4.4
Transition 1–2
1
GCI 2011–2012 (out of 142) ..................................... 72 ......4.2 GCI 2010–2011 (out of 139) ..................................... 72 ......4.1
Factor driven
Transition 2–3
2
3
Efficiency driven
Basic requirements (39.3%) .......................................47 ......4.9
Innovation driven
Institutions
Institutions ................................................................ 66 ......4.0 Infrastructure ............................................................ 67 ......4.0 Macroeconomic environment ................................... 16 ......6.1 Health and primary education ................................... 92 ......5.4
7
Innovation
Infrastructure
6 5
Business sophistication
Macroeconomic environment
4 3
Efficiency enhancers (50.0%) .....................................56 ......4.2
2
Higher education and training ................................... 58 ......4.4 Goods market efficiency .......................................... 71 ......4.2 Labor market efficiency ............................................ 19 ......5.0 Financial market development ................................ 115 ......3.5 Technological readiness ............................................ 55 ......4.2 Market size ............................................................... 55 ......4.1
Market size
Health and primary education
1
Higher education and training
Technological readiness Financial market development
Innovation and sophistication factors (10.7%) .........104 ......3.2
Goods market efficiency Labor market efficiency
Business sophistication ........................................... 99 ......3.6 Innovation ............................................................... 103 ......2.9
Kazakhstan
Economies in transition from 2 to 3
The most problematic factors for doing business Inadequately educated workforce ......................................17.2 Corruption .........................................................................15.7 Tax regulations ....................................................................9.6 Access to financing .............................................................9.5 Inefficient government bureaucracy .....................................9.0 Insufficient capacity to innovate ...........................................7.5 Tax rates..............................................................................6.1 Poor work ethic in national labor force ................................6.0 Inadequate supply of infrastructure ......................................4.7 Inflation ................................................................................4.6 Poor public health ...............................................................4.4 Restrictive labor regulations .................................................2.1 Crime and theft ...................................................................1.6 Foreign currency regulations ................................................1.2 Policy instability ...................................................................0.9 Government instability/coups ..............................................0.0 0
5
10
15
20
Percent of responses Note:
From the list of factors above, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for doing business in their country and to rank them between 1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
216 | The Global Competitiveness Report 2012–2013
25
30