Farm grain supply contracts for biosecurity

Page 1

The economics of area wide management: the case of Qfly (Subtitle: the economics of surveillance) Ben White, Rohan Sadler, Veronique Florec and Bernie Dominiak Project 70100 Optimal Investment in R&D for Plant Biosecurity Science Exchange The Vines 2012

biosecurity built on science


The Challenge  Potential loss of key organo-phosphate controls in Fenthion and Dimethoate.  Potentially a greater dependence in future on area-wide management schemes (AWM).  Public good problem - costs mostly borne by taxpayers- benefits largely go to producers

biosecurity built on science


The Challenge  Typically AWM is assessed as a whole for a BCA  The study analyses how AWM should be designed in terms of surveillance, eradication and area designated - focus on surveillance  Pest ecology system, data-based approach  Economics has the capacity to integrate the components of a system  Ask relevant questions  Also has the capacity to overlook a key issue through simplification biosecurity built on science


What is Optimal

Surveillance? NSW

Broken Hill + +

SA

Menindee

+

+

Pooncarie

Hillston +

Mildura

Griffith

+ Loxton

+

Hay +

Swan Hill

+

Legend PestMon Traps (NSW) + FFEZ Boundary Echuca PFA Boundary State Boundary 15km Buffer around Traps 15km Buffer around Production Areas

+ Shepparton

biosecurity built on science

VIC


Benefits of Surveillance

after Kompas & Che 2009

X t , Yt

X max

X

e

d Q =0

c

X Qd low

f d

X QT high

X

a x0

d

b

min

T d (Q high )

T e (Q high )

T d (Q low )

T d (0)

T e (Q low )

g T

t

biosecurity built on science


0

15

Cost increase at an increasing rate as trapping density increases

10

Trap Density (traps per line

0 00

20

5

($/ha/yr) 25

Costs of Surveillance

0

5

500

500

1.5

1.0

1.0

2.0

0.5

1.5

0.5

0

50

2.0

Frequency of Trap Inspections (per week)

biosecurity built on science

Frequency of Trap Insp


However, space-time complexity ...  Outbreaks are seasonally and spatially varying.  Durations of outbreaks (i.e., recertification periods) are seasonally and spatially varying.  Both depend on ‘market rules’.  Exhibit complex dependencies: longer durations => fewer outbreaks.

biosecurity built on science


Market Rules     

Biosecurity Constraint Recertification Rule Areal Rule Treatment Rule Capture Rule:

biosecurity built on science


Market Rules – Biosecurity Constraint

REVENUE  Market Returns are Fixed COSTS  Surveillance  Eradication  Post-harvest treatments biosecurity built on science


Total Revenue

$

0

Q Surveillance biosecurity built on science


Total Revenue

$

Post-Harvest Treatment Costs

0

Q Surveillance biosecurity built on science


Total Revenue

$

Post-Harvest Treatment Costs

0

Q Surveillance biosecurity built on science


Total Revenue

$ Surveillance Costs

Eradication Costs

Post-Harvest Treatment Costs

0

Q Surveillance biosecurity built on science


Total Revenue

$ Surveillance Costs

Eradication Costs

Post-Harvest Treatment Costs

0

QB Biosecurity Constraint

Q Surveillance biosecurity built on science


Total Revenue

$ Surveillance Costs

a

b

Eradication Costs

Post-Harvest Treatment Costs

0

QB Biosecurity Constraint

Q Surveillance biosecurity built on science


Total Revenue

$ Surveillance Costs

a

b

Eradication Costs

Post-Harvest Treatment Costs

0

QB Biosecurity Constraint

Q Surveillance biosecurity built on science


Total Costs

Total Revenue

$ Surveillance Costs

a

b Minimum Value of PFA Eradication Costs

Post-Harvest Treatment Costs

0

QB Biosecurity Constraint

Q Surveillance biosecurity built on science


Total Costs

Total Revenue

$ Surveillance Costs

a

b

Eradication Costs

Post-Harvest Treatment Costs

0

QB Biosecurity Constraint

Q* Optimum

Q Surveillance biosecurity built on science


Qfly Benefit-Cost Model: QFAWM Ecological

Input Database

Landscape

Climate

Traps

Trap Events

Market Access

Production

Spatial covariates of each pixel

Time varying climate indices for each pixel.

Temporal and spatial location of traps

Temporal and spatial location of trap events

Temporal and spatial location of trap events

Regional production mix and timing

e.g. elevation road density land use

e.g. degree days moisture stress (from Jan 1991)

(from Jan 1990)

e.g. species id number caught (from May 1998)

e.g. 1 generation 1 gen + 28 days 3 generations

e.g. export/ domestic market share and price

4698 traps (NSW)

~38000 Qfly Events

45 covariates; 474846 pixels 71 indices; 1000 weeks

Ecological JumpDiffusion Model

Economic

Observational

Probability of Outbreak

Duration of Outbreak

Production Value (local, seasonal)

Benefit Cost Model

Variable Costs of Outbreak

3 host crops

Monitoring Outputs

Post Harvest Costs

Eradication Costs

10 rules; 14 tables

reduced eradication costs? more market access? more detections?

=

Quarantine / Education Outputs reduced outbreak probability?

Integrate over space and time

Benefit

-

Fixed Costs

(e.g. monitoring)

=

Net Production Benefit

Red – Agency Costs Brown – Producer Costs biosecurity built on science


20 15

Postharvest

10

01

)snoilliM 1102 DUA( stsoC latoT

stsoC latoT ecnaTotal llievruSCosts noitaSurveillance cidarE tsevrEradication ahtsoP

51

Result – select The minimum Number of traps that satisfy the rule

5

5 0

0

Total Costs (AUD Total 2011Costs millions) (AUD 2011 Millions)

02

Results- Optimal Surveillance

1 0001

001.6 8

002.8 6

006.3 4

)m( stnioP ecnallievruSSurveillance neewteb gnicapSEffort

0025 2

(traps/km2)

625 0 biosecurity built on science


-33.5

Contour for Optimal Trap Spacing PFA Boundary State Boundary

900

-34.0

850

2 traps/km2 750

0

Mildura 0

80

-34.5

0 80

85

900 850

-35.0

900

Swan Hill

-35.5

Latitude

Results – Spatial Variability

1 trap/km2 900

900

142.0

142.5

143.0

143.5

144.0 biosecurity built on science

Longitude


Implications – AWM Policy Design  The biosecurity constraint (surveillance to validate area freedom) specifies optimal surveillance, when surveillance is applied at a single rate across the landscape.  Higher voluntary rates of surveillance are predicted well by the value of production (i.e., potentially avoided post-harvest treatment costs).  Prioritise areas for inclusion into an AWM through their potentially avoided post-harvest treatment costs. biosecurity built on science


Acknowledgements DAFWA Richard Johnston, Darryl Hardie, Rob Emery, Shashi Sharma, Francis De Lima I & I NSW Kathryn Tobin, Richard Roger, Olga Ozols, Katina Lindhout, John Gould, DPI Victoria

CSIRO Entomology Darren Kriticos, David Cook, Hazel Parry ABARE CRC NPB QUT Tony Clarke, Sama LowChoy, Mark Stanaway

DSE Victoria – Emil Skender

UQ – Myron Zalucki

BOM – Cathy Toby

NEARMAP

biosecurity built on science


Economic Data Sources      

Citrus Australia Murray Valley Citrus Board (MVCB) Australian Table Grape Association Inc (ATGA) Summerfruit Australia ABS National Code of Practice for the Management of Queensland Fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggart). Draft, November 2008, Version 18

biosecurity built on science


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.