Dispersal and resource use by the lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica) in southern NSW

Page 1

Dispersal and resource use by the lesser grain borer (LGB, Rhyzopertha dominica) in southern NSW Mark Stevens Principal Research Scientist NSW DPI, Yanco biosecurity built on science Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity


Objectives  Quantify dispersal capability of LGB in SE Australian agricultural landscapes.  Screen non-grain food sources for their ability to support LGB development.  Collect field samples of plants that support LGB development and try and isolate LGB from them. Project duration: Budget:

9½ months $77,764 biosecurity built on science


Dispersal capability I Validation of fluorescent powder marking using double-marked LGB released and recaptured at 100m into propylene glycol. 1. Marked LGB stay marked. 2. No powder transfer to wild beetles in collection containers.

biosecurity built on science


Dispersal capability II Medium range quantitative dispersal.

Release station Lindgren funnel trap biosecurity built on science


Dispersal capability II Medium range quantitative dispersal. 8 traps at 1,000 m radius positioned by GPS. 10,000 LGB placed in release station (4 batches over 8 days, recovery every 2 days). Traps emptied and pheromone dispensers replaced every 4 days until 14 days after final release. biosecurity built on science


Medium range quantitative dispersal 5,690 LGB actively dispersed from the release station. 3,855 LGB caught in traps, of which 80 were marked.

1.4% recovery of marked LGB at 1,000m Different grid designs make comparisons with overseas studies difficult - but this seems high relative to studies in the USA. Maximum known distance for LGB dispersal from other studies is 3.6 km (3 LGB of ~ 64,000 released).

biosecurity built on science


Dispersal capability III Short-range quantitative dispersal.

Traps in concentric circles, equally spaced on perimeter, 100 & 200m radii with plans to extend further. Problem – beetles from weekly releases were surviving in the area for too long; marked LGB dispersed and recovered

2000 dispersed recovered

1800

250 200 150

So we changed to three alternating colours of marking powders.

100 50

20 0

0

0 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

week

biosecurity built on science


Short-range quantitative dispersal. Mean recovery from 8 traps at 200m not much higher than from the same number of traps at 1,000m 3.0

Marking powder effect? Too early to tell.

2.5

% recovery

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0 100

distance (m)

200

biosecurity built on science


Host plant suitability I • • • • •

Wheat, sorghum and maize standards plus three test materials per experiment. 15 g sample size. 10 female & 5 male LGB < 4 days adult age, recovered after 3 weeks. Weekly monitoring and removal from 42 to 77 days, then final count at 105 days. 30oC, 65% RH, 15L:9D.

Why? 1. What is the best standard? 2. Is one standard enough? 3. How long does it take for the first F1 adults to appear on a REALLY POOR host? 4. How much replication is necessary to separate a non-host from a bad one? Not just about immediate answers, but building a better procedure for future work.

biosecurity built on science


Host plant suitability I Host

Material

Total LGB recovered (SE)

# of replicates producing LGB

Days to first emergence detection (range)

♀ pronotal width (SE), mm

♂ pronotal width (SE), mm

Experiment 1 Wheat

seed

237 (19.9) a

4

42

NM

NM

Sorghum

seed

247 (7.4) a

4

42

NM

NM

Maize

seed

158 (10.6) b

4

42

NM

NM

A.baileyana

seed

4 (1.3) c

3

60 (48 – 77)

NM

NM

A.cultriformis

seed

0

0

-

-

-

B.populneus

seed

0

0

-

-

-

Experiment 2 Wheat

seed

211 (19.4) a

4

44 (42 – 49)

0.792 (0.004) a

0.797 (0.004) a

Sorghum

seed

234 (13.1) a

4

47 (42 – 49)

0.793 (0.004) a

0.799 (0.005) a

Maize

seed

124 (3.2) b

4

47 (42 – 49)

0.768 (0.006) b

0.767 (0.007) b

P.canariensis

fruit

55 (7.2) c

4

66 (63 – 70)

0.741 (0.004) c

0.739 (0.005) c

fruit (rind)

0

0

-

-

-

fruit

0

0

-

-

-

C.sinensis O.europaea

biosecurity built on science


Host plant suitability I Moderate hosts (40 - 60 LGB /rep.) Canary Island Date Palm fruit, English Oak acorns. Poor hosts: (< 10 LGB / rep.) Cootamundra Wattle, Flinder’s Range Wattle, Capeweed flowers/seeds. Non-hosts: (0 LGB) Citrus, olives, Knifeleaf wattle seeds, Kurrajong seeds. Faster screening protocol: • single grain standard, 3 replicates, 105 days, assessment at end only. • same exposure to parent LGB. • screening of 10 additional materials underway. No native species yet identified as moderate or good hosts. High oil content seems to preclude LGB development.

biosecurity built on science


Host plant suitability II • Field-collected plant samples. • Sieving, incubation at 30oC for 8 weeks, sieving, then Tullgren funnel extraction.

biosecurity built on science


Recoveries from field collected plant samples

None so far.

Thousands ex Canary Island date palm

One individual ex Canary Island date palm (only 260g DW of material so far extracted)

biosecurity built on science


Thank you  For more information, please email mark.stevens@dpi.nsw.gov.au  .... or talk to me afterwards ....

biosecurity built on science


Host plant suitability I

R.dominica adults (mean cumulative)

300 Wheat Sorghum Maize P.canariensis

250

A A

200 150

B 100 C

50 0

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

days biosecurity built on science


Pheromone dispenser activity decline r 2= 0.34

'fixed' trap as % of 'renewed'

100

80

60

40

20

0 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

days since establishment biosecurity built on science


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.