Currency Trader 09 Sample

Strategies, analysis, and news for FX traders

January 2009 Volume 6, No. 1

FOREX WATCH 2009 p. 8 THE EURO: Back in the saddle or just a bounce? p. 14 INSIDE-DAY FADE: Simple setup proves resilient p. 20

CURRENCY TRENDS: The majors p. 26 SPOT CHECK: Dollar vs. Euro relative performance p. 32 FED CUTS and the fate of the buck p. 38

CONTENTS

Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6

Global Markets 2009: Around the world in four currencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 What does the new year hold for currency traders after 2008’s turmoil? Here are few ideas to keep on your radar.

By Currency Trader Staff

On the Money The Euro: Prosperity or perdition? . . . . .14 The belief the Euro sell-off has ended may be based on some false assumptions about how the U.S. and Europe are handling the economic crisis.

Trading Strategies Inside-day setups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Inside days present interesting setup opportunities in the Euro/U.S. dollar pair — if you pay attention to the details.

By Chris Peters

Advanced Strategies Let the trend be your friend: The majors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 If currencies trend so much, why do trend followers usually have such blah performance?

This and other questions are answered in this study of currency trends.

By Howard L. Simons

By Barbara Rockefeller

continued on p. 4

2

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

FREE 25 $

Currency Trading Account No Deposit Necessarylargest financial market with FXCM Trade the world's Free Trading Signals EUR/USD 1.5 Pips, USD/JPY 1.6 Pips* Keep All Your Profits

www.fxcmmicro.com/ct Offer expires 2/1/2009

Restrictions apply. Please visit the URL listed above for details. *NOTE: FXCM strives to provide traders with tight, competitive spreads; however, there may be instances when market conditions cause spreads to widen beyond the typical spreads displayed here.

WARNING: Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Before deciding to trade foreign exchange, you should carefully consider your monetary objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite. The possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or all of your deposited funds, and therefore you should not speculate with capital that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with foreign exchange trading and seek advice from an independent advisor if you have any doubts. Past returns are not indicative of future results.

CONTENTS

Spot Check Euro relative performance . . . . . . . . . . . .32 The Euro/U.S. dollar pair crashed hard in October, but opinions vary on whether this was a dollar story or a Euro story. Analyzing the Euro’s performance vs. other currencies sheds light on the situation.

By Currency Trader Staff

International Markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34

New Products & Services . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 Conferences, seminars, and other events.

Numbers from the global forex, stock, and interest-rate markets.

Global Economic Calendar . . . . . . . . . . . .41 Forex News Rate cuts fuel deflation fears . . . . . . . . . .38 Inflation continued to drop as the Fed cut its target lending rate to a historic low in December, amplifying the dollar’s mid-month drop against major currencies.

Important dates for currency traders.

Key concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42 Forex Journal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43 Long or short the Euro?

Have a question about something you’ve seen in Currency Trader?

Submit your editorial queries or comments to webmaster@currencytradermag.com.

Looking for an advertiser?

Consult the list below and click on the company name for a direct link to the ad in this month’s issue of Currency Trader.

4

CME Group

InterbankFX

Trader’s Expo

dbFX

MetaStock

Tsunami Trading

eSignal

PFGBEST.com

FXCM

RS of Houston

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

ads0708

5/12/08

5:05 PM

Page 39

CONTRIBUTORS CONTRIBUTORS

A publication of Active Trader ®

For all subscriber services: www.currencytradermag.com Editor-in-chief: Mark Etzkorn metzkorn@currencytradermag.com Managing editor: Molly Goad mgoad@currencytradermag.com Associate editor: Chris Peters cpeters@currencytradermag.com Contributing writers: Howard Simons, Barbara Rockefeller, Marc Chandler Editorial assistant and Webmaster: Kesha Green kgreen@currencytradermag.com Art director: Laura Coyle lcoyle@currencytradermag.com

Howard

Simons is president of

Rosewood Trading Inc. and a strategist for Bianco Research. He writes and speaks frequently on a wide range of economic and

President: Phil Dorman pdorman@currencytradermag.com Publisher, Ad sales East Coast and Midwest: Bob Dorman bdorman@currencytradermag.com

financial market issues.

Barbara Rockefeller (http://www.rts-forex.com) is an international economist with a focus on foreign exchange. She has worked as a forecaster, trader, and con-

Ad sales West Coast and Southwest only: Allison Chee achee@currencytradermag.com

sultant at Citibank and other financial institutions, and

Classified ad sales: Mark Seger seger@currencytradermag.com

Dummies (For Dummies, 2004), 24/7 Trading Around the

currently publishes two daily reports on foreign exchange. Rockefeller is the author of Technical Analysis for

Clock, Around the World (John Wiley & Sons, 2000), The Global Trader (John Wiley & Sons, 2001), and How to Invest

Volume 6, Issue 1. Currency Trader is published monthly by TechInfo, Inc., 161 N. Clark Street, Suite 4915, Chicago, IL 60601. Copyright © 2009 TechInfo, Inc. All rights reserved. Information in this publication may not be stored or reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher.

Internationally, published in Japan in 1999. A book tenta-

The information in Currency Trader magazine is intended for educational purposes only. It is not meant to recommend, promote or in any way imply the effectiveness of any trading system, strategy or approach. Traders are advised to do their own research and testing to determine the validity of a trading idea.

Trading and investing carry a high level of risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

on the board of directors of a large European hedge fund.

6

tively titled How to Trade FX is in the works. Rockefeller is

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

GLOBAL MARKETS

2009: Around the world in four currencies There are opportunities in the forex market as currencies realign after the fall 2008 market dislocation, but traders should tread carefully.

BY CURRENCY TRADER STAFF

FIGURE 1 — EURO RETRENCHMENT After the yen, the U.S. dollar jumped the most during the late-2008 market crisis.

Source: TradeStation

FIGURE 2 — EURO/DOLLAR The dollar might struggle vs. the Euro, at least early in 2009.

A

mid the storm of financial and economic crises that dominated the year, many traders were happy to close the door on 2008. Last year’s action in the foreign exchange market was volatile, with fall and winter action driven by massive risk aversion and global position liquidation.

The Japanese yen came out on top of the 2008 carnage, chalking up a 23-percent gain vs. the dollar. The main factor propelling the yen was a massive exit out of carry trades, which sparked doubledigit losses in many of the high-yielding currencies that were the on the long side of this popular trade.

The Australian dollar (AUD) dropped 21 percent vs. the dollar through Dec. 30, the New Zealand dollar (NZD) declined 25 percent, the Brazilian real plunged 24 percent, the Mexican peso sank 22 percent and the South African rand (ZAR) plummeted 27 percent.

The British pound (GBP), which posted a dismal 27.3 percent drop vs. the U.S. dollar as of Dec. 30, was the weakest of the most liquid currencies, according to John Rothfield, senior currency analyst at Bank of America. He says Britain’s paper suffered especially because its economy is so reliant on the financial and housing sectors.

The most positive performers, Rothfield adds, were the low-yielding currencies pointing to the yen and the Swiss franc, which gained 7 percent vs. the dollar.

Dollar action

Source: TradeStation

8

The U.S. dollar was the second-biggest beneficiary of the economic crisis, as funds flooded into the buck as a safe haven (Figure 1). The U.S. dollar ended the year with a modest 4.8-percent gain vs. the Euro, as August through November saw a sharp reversal of the bear market action that has dominated the greenback since 2002. The Euro/dollar (EUR/USD) plunged to $1.23 in November from the 1.6000 July high (Figure 2) — a 38.2-percent retracement of the 2002-2008 bear market for the U.S. dollar.

Into year-end, however, the U.S. dollar gave back some its gains, as the immediate financial panic subsided and the U.S. made a historic shift to a January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

near-zero interest rate policy: On Dec. 16, the U.S. Federal Reserve slashed the Fed funds rate to a range from zero to 0.25 basis points, which detracts from the dollar from an interest-rate differential perspective.

The Euro/dollar had climbed back above 1.4000 by year-end.

Rothfield says U.S. fundamentals aren’t particularly good. He chalks up a large portion of the massive fall rally in the dollar to “unusual market conditions and a huge shortage of the dollar globally,” which triggered safe-haven buying in the greenback and U.S. Treasuries.

“We think in the early part of the year — through the spring — the U.S. dollar will struggle under the weight of U.S. quantitative easing,” he says.

Euro/pound and the ECB vs. BOE Outside the dollar arena, forex traders are focusing squarely on Euro/pound (EUR/GBP). The pair rocketed 18 percent in December, surging to around 0.9800 on Dec. 29 (Figure 3). The Euro has never traded at parity (1.00) with the pound, but the fundamental outlook for the UK is bleak.

“I think when traders come back to work in the new year they will push the momentum to test parity,” Ideaglobal analyst Kevin Chau says.

“We see that parity is an objective for market players,” says Michael Woolfolk, senior currency strategist at the Bank of New York Mellon. “Market sentiment is long Euro and short pound with an eye on an important psychological level.”

Expected central bank action and interest-rate differentials are playing a part in the recent trend.

“The European Central Bank [ECB] is going to drag its feet on cutting interest rates, while the Bank of England [BOE] takes continued aggressive action,” Woolfolk says.

The BOE is scheduled to meet on Jan. 8 and the market widely anticipates it will cut rates, which currently stand at 2 percent (expectations range from 0.5 to 1-percent).

The ECB is also expected to slash rates, but at a more muted pace, at its Jan. 15 meeting.

The ECB’s current repo rate is 2.5 percent.

Analysts forecast a cut ranging from 0.25 to 0.50 percent.

ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet has been on the record with cautious statecontinued on p. 10

CURRENCY TRADER • January 2009

9

GLOBAL MARKETS continued FIGURE 3 — EURO/POUND

ments that suggest muted interest-rate easing.

“The ECB has built a tremendous amount of market credibility by not shocking the market,” Woolfolk says.

In addition to interest-rate differentials, growth differentials also favor a continuation of the recent Euro/pound trend. Bank of New York Mellon is forecasting a 2-percent decline for UK 2009 gross domestic product (GDP) vs. a 1-percent decline for the Eurozone.

“The recession has not hit central Europe as acutely as it has hit the UK,” Woolfolk says.

Woolfolk, for one, sees the potential for the uptrend to extend beyond the parity level into the new year “until the ECB signals that it is prepared to adopt a zero interest-rate policy along with the U.S. and UK,” he says.

Finally, Woolfolk says recent trade data is also bullish for the Euro vs. the pound.

“The trade figures in the Eurozone are relatively stable and balanced, vs. a large trade deficit in the UK,” he says.

He says October 2008 data showed an EU trade surplus of €900 million vs. a deficit of £3.9 billion for the UK. On the downside, Woolfolk cites .9250 as key support.

“If we were to close below that level, it would take out this bullish uptrend,” he says.

Woolfolk does warn of the potential for “buy the rumor, sell the fact” action around the early January BOE meeting and says traders “may get in early and take profits if the BOE does what they are expecting.”

But once the Euro/pound conquers the parity level in the weeks ahead, Woolfolk predicts forex traders will continue eyeing round numbers at 1.0100 and then 1.0200.

Woolfolk advises traders to watch for indications the ECB is considering a zero interest-rate policy, which could prompt significant profit-taking.

With a weak UK economic picture, the EUR/GBP pair could make a run to 1.000 and beyond.

Source: TradeStation

FIGURE 4 — AUSSIE/CANADA Economic fundamentals in favor of the land down under make the Aussie/Canada pair a market to watch in coming months.

Aussie/Canada Source: TradeStation Another cross with potential for movement is the Australian dollar/Canadian dollar (AUD/CAD) pair, according to Brian Dolan, chief currency stratescheduled to meet next on Feb. 3. Further rate cuts are gist at Forex.com. The pair was trading around 0.8500 at expected, with Dolan forecasting a bottom to the RBA easyear-end (Figure 4), and Dolan sees a possible move to ing cycle around 3.25-3.00 percent, which would still favor 0.9500 or parity. the Aussie dollar over the Canadian currency.

Dolan believes a number of factors including interest-rate Dolan also interprets a more bullish commodity-export differentials, commodity exports, and regional growth picture for Australia. opportunities are tipping in favor of Australia in the new “Both are considered commodity currencies, but the big year. difference is that Canada is oil reliant and I expect oil prices The Bank of Canada’s (BOC) lending rate currently stands to remain weak,” he says. at 1.5 percent; a 0.50-percent cut is expected at the Jan. 20 Australia is the world’s leading coal exporter and Dolan meeting. That compares to the 4.25-percent rate target cur- saw continued massive demand for coal from China. continued on p. 12 rently held by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), which is

10

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

GLOBAL MARKETS continued

FIGURE 5 — AUSSIE/U.S. DOLLAR Some analysts believe the Australian dollar’s sell-off was overdone and the currency is poised to rebound.

“There is regional support for Australian commodity output,” he says.

Canada, Dolan notes, is closely tied with the U.S., which is in the midst of a recession, while Australia is close in proximity to the Asian region.

“Generally speaking, the Asian region seems to be faring best out of all the regions globally, which will support Australia,” Dolan says.

Dolan thinks the .8250 to .8400 zone is a good buying area for Aussie/Canada.

“Try to pick it up if we get some weakness near term,” he says.

Dolan says the strategy would be negated on a drop below .8000 if that were to occur. On the upside, he sees .9500-1.000 as an objective.

Outright Aussie play Bob Sinche, head of global currency strategy at Bank Source: TradeStation of America, likes the Australian dollar on an outright basis, calling it currently an “out of favor” curcarry trade unwinding (Figure 5). rency.

“It had an enormous correction,” Sinche says. “The sell“We think on a relative basis, the Australian dollar is still pretty well positioned for the new year,” he says. “It has suf- off has been excessive. If it regained just half of that decline we could get up to .7900, which would be more than a 15fered a lot in the second half of [2008].”

Sinche notes the Australian dollar sank 27.5 percent vs. percent move from current levels [around .6900].” the U.S. dollar in the second half of the year vs. a 9.5 percent South African rand gain in the first half. “[The Australian dollar] went from being one of the top- Marc Chandler, global head of FX strategy at Brown performing currencies to one of the worst-performing cur- Brothers Harriman, sees potential in the long dollar/short rencies,” he continues. “It is viewed as a risk currency and rand play. At year-end, the USD/ZAR pair was trading part of its performance will depend on risk appetite in the around 9.36 (Figure 6). Chandler thinks the cross could return to the 11.00 level in the first half of 2009. new year.”

“People seem reluctant to invest in high flying currency But he notes Australia’s recent remarkable turnaround in markets,” Chandler says. “South Africa is the poster child its trade balance from deficit to surplus is a bullish factor.

Looking ahead, Sinche agrees with Dolan in that as a for high risk in emerging markets, and countries that are major commodity exporter of coal and iron ore, Australia is most prone to crises will be avoided.”

Chandler says the expected contraction in the global econwell positioned geographically from long-term growth in omy in 2009 would keep commodity prices under pressure, China.

The Aussie/dollar scored a high at .9850 in July 2008 and which will also weigh bearishly on the South African econsubsequently sank to .6000 in late October, amid massive omy.

FIGURE 6 — DOLLAR/RAND As an emerging-market poster child, South Africa and its currency, the rand, could be under pressure in 2009.

Source: ADVFN (http://www.advfn.com)

12

Playing it safe There may be opportunity, but forex traders should be cautious in the new year as volatile conditions could reemerge at any time.

“People are looking for singles as opposed to doubles and home runs in the early part of the year because of the uncertainty on the global front,” Rothfield says.

“People had been very defensive in the fourth quarter of the year and had to sell good stuff to offset losses in other areas.

We will get some further unwind of the extreme risk aversion and see a temporary return of risk appetite and search for yields.”

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

ON THE MONEY

The Euro: Prosperity or perdition?

The cold, hard realities of the current market may force the European Central Bank to alter its course, with important ramifications for the Euro.

BY BARBARA ROCKEFELLER

T

assumptions. But in a crisis situation such as today’s, not even “facts” are reliable and just about every assumption should be looked at with suspicious eyes.

These are the times we question whether what we think we know is true, and wonder whether what we don’t know is going to jump up and bite us on the nose. This is true of fundamentals and technicals alike.

Figure 1 shows the EUR/USD on a weekly basis. The Euro uptrend from the 2000 low to the 2008 high is clear.

FIGURE 1 — BACK TO NORMAL The precipitous drop starting After the precipitous drop that started in October 2008 the EUR/USD is moving back in October 2008 is equally inside its normal channel. clear. In retrospect, the government allowing Lehman to fail on Sept. 15 was the trigger for the Euro’s fall, which was really the dollar’s rise. Fear and greed were replaced by fear and more fear, and the dollar became a safe haven.

Now that the shock of the Lehman failure is fading, the Euro/dollar price is returning inside its “normal” channel.

This is the basis, in part, of forecasts calling for the Euro to continue rising and for the price to meet 1.5000 around year-end and test the old July high of 1.6038 at some time during 2009.

he consensus forecast today for the Euro/dollar (EUR/USD) is a move up to 1.5000 and probably higher—perhaps a test of the July 2008 high above 1.6000. But this forecast is based on few facts and questionable assumptions.

All forecasts entail creating a scenario for the most likely outcome. Sometimes it’s all too easy to convince yourself a scenario is highly likely given certain facts and reasonable

Source: data — eSignal and Reuters Online; charts — MetaStock

14

Rethinking assumptions This scenario might seem reaJanuary 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

FIGURE 2 — SETTING UP A TEST If the Euro fails to surpass the previous intermediate high, it could test the low of 1.1815 from November 2005.

sonable, but it’s not. It assumes the Lehman Collapse Shock did not have a permanent effect on the primary trend. Once a trend is broken, we need to consider all factors anew. Notice the red support line connecting lows was broken along with the linear regression channel line.

Okay, so let’s assume the Lehman Shock started something fresh but it’s just not evident yet (Figure 2).

Support and resistance get broken all the time and it doesn’t necessarily mean a move is over, but we can feel continued on p. 16

Source: data — eSignal and Reuters Online; charts — MetaStock

ON THE MONEY continued

FIGURE 3 — ALTERNATE SCENARIO An alternate scenario posits the recent EUR/USD high as an as-yet-untested breakout above the upper boundary of a new downtrend channel.

Source: data — eSignal and Reuters Online; charts — MetaStock

FIGURE 4 — IMAGINARY TREND CHANNEL A hypothetical 45-degree downtrend channel projects the possibility of the EUR/USD pair challenging the October 2008 low, or even a run below 1.2000 by this time next year.

Source: data — eSignal and Reuters Online; charts — MetaStock

16

comfortable making such an assertion only if price now surpasses the previous intermediate high (upper horizontal gold line) at 1.4867, a level that occurred right after the Lehman Shock. If the Euro fails to match and surpass that level, it might test the previous low (bottom horizontal gold line) at 1.1815 from November 2005. In other words, there may be a new probable range forming.

We can try to measure the new range by drawing a new trend channel (Figure 3). In this scenario, the recent EUR/USD high is a breakout, as yet untested, above the upper boundary of a new downtrend channel. Let’s say the Euro falls by 50 percent of the original down move, or to about 1.3650. That would put it back at the channel top and, as we know, a 50-percent move is an important benchmark. Together with the failure to test and surpass the old intermediate high, it might mean the down-sloping channel is the right one.

The problem with this channel is it’s a work in progress — and it’s too steep.

So let’s invent a new more probable trendline channel at about a 45 degree angle, which is the slope of the up move from 2006 to the high in 2008 (Figure 4). It’s fairly crazy to construct linear regression channels out of thin air, but let’s add another assumption: high volatility and choppiness characterize the first phase of a crisis, and January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

FIGURE 5 — BIG PICTURE FIBONACCI RETRACEMENT A 62-percent retracement of the move from 0.8229 in October 2000 to 1.6038 in July 2008 would put price at 1.1214.

as players become familiar with the new environment, increasingly stable prices will emerge. In fact, currencies sometimes have prolonged periods of sideways price action with little or no trend. This makes a trendline’s slope less steep.

If this scenario is true and useful, the EUR/USD pair could not only challenge the October 2008 low around 1.2329, but also make a run below 1.2000 by this time next year— perhaps as far as 1.1000. In fact, 1.1214 is a 62-percent retracement of the bigpicture move from the low of 0.8229 in October 2000 to the high in July 2008 at 1.6038, as shown in Figure 5.

Fibonacci numbers are an unfounded superstition, but enough traders like continued on p. 18

Source: data — eSignal and Reuters Online; charts — MetaStock

ON THE MONEY continued

them that we ignore them at our peril.

If the imaginary trend channel is the correct scenario, why would the price development proceed that way? For once we have an easy answer. The European Central Bank (ECB) has been in denial, stating that inflation is still a worry and they need to see more data before they can cut rates further.

Now that the Fed has effectively cut to zero, the Bank of Japan has cut to nearly zero, and the Bank of England is widely expected to follow suit in early January, the ECB is the only major central bank that is out of line. The yield differential favors the Euro right now, with the overnight repo rate at 2.5 percent.

Evidently the ECB is not impressed

by French wholesale inflation falling from 4.3 percent year-over-year in October to 1.9 percent in November, or other indicators of severe contraction.

The German Kiel Institute says German GDP will fall 2.7 percent in 2009, to be followed by a pathetic 0.3 percent in 2010. One ECB policy mem-

Other Barbara Rockefeller articles: “The six Ds of depression” Currency Trader, December 2008.

The buck has gotten a bounce from the recent financial panic, but the longer-term picture isn’t quite as bullish.

“Euro and dollar at parity?”

Currency Trader, November 2008.

A few short months ago the world was contemplating Euro $2. Now, the talk is all about Euro $1. What are the odds it will happen?

“Crisis of confidence” Currency Trader, October 2008.

As Wall Street and Washington prove themselves equally inept, the dollar suffers.

“The dollar-oil connection” Currency Trader, September 2008.

As oil broke, so did the Euro/dollar pair. What can we learn from analyzing bursting bubbles?

“Horizontal patterns in foreign exchange” Currency Trader, August 2008.

The Euro’s price action lends itself well to dissection with the Darvas Box. “Are the summer doldrums here?”

Currency Trader, July 2008.

If market myth is true, the season will bring a sideways market. But the myth warrants some analysis.

“Manias and crashes: Where will oil lead the dollar?”

Currency Trader, June 2008.

Although some analysts argue a falling dollar is helping to push up oil prices, it might be the other way around. The question is, when will the bubble-go-round stop?

“Is the Euro going to the moon?”

Currency Trader, May 2008.

A look at the Euro’s recent gravity-defying performance.

“What’s really driving the dollar?”

Currency Trader, April 2008.

Signs of a potential turnaround in the buck can be found in an unexpected place.

“Why is the yen trending higher?”

Currency Trader, March 2008.

The yen’s rise seems to defy logic. Find out what’s behind it.

“Fundamentals lead the charts” Currency Trader, February 2008.

The recent global market turmoil and banking crises have the financial world on edge, but their impact on the dollar might not be what most people expect.

“A fistful of dollars, a bundle of contradictions” Currency Trader, December 2007.

The U.S. currency must resolve several paradoxes to emerge from its funk. One overlooked positive of the current situation may offer the depressed buck a way out of its bind.

“The road to 1.5” Currency Trader, November 2007.

The dollar appears to be under siege, but perhaps the situation isn’t as grim as popularly believed.

“Helicopter Ben and the Japanese yen” Currency Trader, October 2007.

The American and Japanese economies, and the fate of the confounding yen.

“The dollar’s ‘sub-prime’ future” Currency Trader, September 2007.

The fallout from the U.S. housing and mortgage meltdown may be far from over, and how things unfold will have a big impact on the forex market.

“The rising yen — here we go again” Currency Trader, August 2007.

The yen has been on the rise vs. the dollar. Find out if it’s a reversal or just a correction.

You can purchase and download past articles at http://store.activetradermag.com.

18

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

ber said in December it would be logical for the bank to cut rates once it sees inflation expectations dropping under 2 percent.

But the ECB is not entirely asleep at the switch. On Dec. 19 the ECB acted to remove some of the carry-trade charm of the Euro and halt a flood of incoming deposits from the dollar and the British pound by cutting the official deposit rate by 50 basis points to 1 percent below the key repo rate of 2.5 percent, and raising the lending rate by 50 basis points to 1 percent above the key rate. This created a wider rate spread “corridor.” It still leaves the Euro with a rate advantage for deposits, but a much smaller one, and it has the side effect of raising the cost of borrowing for European firms.

You’d think that’s the last thing a central bank would want to do in the current economic environment, although it has the bonus of raising bank profitability.

The effect of the Dec. 19 announcement was immediate and huge — the Euro swooned more than 500 points in a few hours. We must expect the same response if and when the ECB cuts the repo rate itself, possibly at its Jan. 8 policy meeting. The market expects the ECB to ultimately cut rates to 0.50 percent, a total of 200 basis points. If the ECB were to cut by 25-bp increments, it would have many months to go to get to 0-0.25 percent, like the Fed. In fact, it would take to Sept 2010.

This seems improbable on the face of it. The ECB may be stubborn but it also values its reputation as a responsive institution, even if it values more highly its reputation for inflationfighting. So let’s assume the ECB cuts by 50-bp increments, getting to 0.025 percent or 0.50 percent by June. The expectation of these cuts is Euro-negative.

CURRENCY TRADER • January 2009

Finally, we all know by now that monetary policy alone cannot carry the weight of fixing a Great Depression II. That’s why the Fed followed the Bank of Japan and instituted a policy of “quantitative easing,” which in practice means buying just about any assets not on life-support from the banks and giving them cash.

So far the banks are hoarding cash and refusing to lend it out, but Fed chairman Ben Bernanke has hope the banks will eventually find the confidence to start lending again.

The ECB has already bought much in the way of unconventional collateralized assets, ballooning its balance sheet by roughly a third, but it does not have the ability to mandate stimulative fiscal policies. Together the EU countries will be spending €200 billion, but this is independent of the ECB. Europe lacks pan-EU fiscal institutions to boost every nation across the board. The collaboration of the U.S. Fed and the U.S. Treasury, together with an activist Executive, hold out more recovery hope than Europe can dream of — probably a total of $2 or even $3 trillion. In fact, we might say the one thing the ECB lacks above all else is President-elect Barack Obama, although French President Nicolas Sarkozy has the same “whatever it takes” stance.

Advantage, dollar?

Last fall some clever analyst came up with the “FIFO” scenario — the U.S. was the first in to financial institution crisis and recession, so it would also be the first out. Judging from the robustness of the U.S. government response, this is probably a good bet. June could arrive with the ECB still cutting rates and European governments squabbling over additional fiscal stimulus while the U.S. begins to show signs of 19

recovery and talk swirls around regarding when the Fed should start raising rates to offset all that inflationinducing new money supply.

In short, an ECB being out of sync with the Fed has only a temporary Euro-favorable effect. Financial crisis has already morphed into an economic crisis, and the ECB lacks sufficient tools to deal with it.

To be fair, it’s not certain the U.S. action will suffice to pull the country out of Great Depression II. But sitting on your hands and letting the generals fight the last war (inflation) sure won’t do it, either.

For information on the author see p. 6.

TRADING STRATEGIES

Inside-day setups Fading the direction of inside days in the Euro/U.S. dollar pair shows promise, but trend direction makes a big difference in the results.

BY CURRENCY TRADER STAFF

T

he November and December 2008 issues of Currency Trader featured articles examining the short-term behavior of major currency pairs after inside days.

The original analysis covered seven currency pairs: U.S. dollar/Canadian dollar (USD/CAD), Euro/U.S. dollar (EUR/USD), British pound/U.S. dollar (GBP/USD), U.S. dollar/Japanese yen (USD/JPY), U.S. dollar/Swiss franc (USD/CHF), Australian dollar/U.S. dollar (AUD/USD), and New Zealand dollar/U.S. dollar (NZD/USD). The results showed inside days — overall, in all currency pairs

— were more often than not followed by bullish price action during the analysis period, but there was another, more interesting, tendency that appeared tradable in some situations: Inside days were often followed by “inverted” price action relative to the inside day’s close. Inside days that closed higher preceded short-term down moves, and vice versa.

The following analysis shows how specific inside-day signals reflecting these tendencies performed over a 10-year period and offers insight on how to construct useful trade setups. The signals are applied to the EUR/USD pair because previous testing showed the basic pattern TABLE 1 — FADING UP- AND DOWN-CLOSING INSIDE DAYS tendencies were more consistent and profitable in With the addition of a very simple filter, taking trades in the opposite direction of an inside this market. day’s close proved to be profitable on both the long and short sides of the market. Better performance in different categories is highlighted.

Net profit Profit factor Number of trades Winning percentage Avg. trade net profit Avg. winning trade Avg. losing trade Avg. win/avg. loss Longest winning streak Longest losing streak

All trades no filter filter $11,647 $28,369 1.11 1.6 340 168 45.29% 54.76% $34 $169 $790 $823 -$591 -$623 1.34 1.32 9 7 9 5

Long trades no filter filter $13,799 $17,406 1.28 1.76 178 92 46.63% 54.35% $78 $189 $767 $809 -$525 -$548 1.46 1.47 5 4 9 5

Short trades no filter filter -$2,152 $10,963 0.96 1.45 162 76 43.83% 55.26% -$13 $144 $817 $840 -$661 -$715 1.24 1.17 7 5 7 5

Total commission Return on initial capital % time in market (exposure) Longest flat period

$6,800 46.59% 21.69% 57 days

$3,560

$3,240

Max. drawdown % of initial capital Net profit as % of drawdown

-$18,052 -$6,190 -72.21% -24.76% 64.52% 458.30%

Source: TradeStation

20

$3,360 113.48% 11.42% 127 days

$1,840

The first pattern The first pattern tests the two-day move following inside days that close higher or lower than the previous day’s close. The trade rules for long trades are: Enter long at today’s close if: 1. Today’s low is above yesterday’s low.

2. Today’s high is below yesterday’s high.

3. Today’s close is below yesterday’s close.

Exit position at the close two days after entry.

$1,520

As formulas, these rules are: -$12,762 -51.05% 108.13%

-$4,958 -19.83% 351.09%

-$16,616 -66.46% -12.95%

-$4,750 -19.00% 230.80%

1. If High < High[1]; 2. Low > Low[1]; 3. If Close < Close[1]

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

Strategy code The following TradeStation code is for the long-side version of the second entry signal. The code allows for customization of the strength or weakness of the day’s close (closethresh) and the look-back period for the trend filter (trendlength).

The rules for short trades are: Enter short at today’s close if: 1. Today’s low is above yesterday’s low.

2. Today’s high is below yesterday’s high.

3. Today’s close is above yesterday’s close.

Exit position at the close two days after entry.

inputs: trendlength(40), closethresh(.35); if High < High[1] and Low > Low[1] and (Close-Low)/(High-Low) <= closethresh and close > close[trendlength] then Buy this bar on close;

All trades were exited on the close two days after entry because initial pattern testing showed the early riskadjusted return was highest on that day: Further gains were probable with longer holding periods, but risk increased at a slightly faster pace.

The setup was tested on daily data in the EUR/USD pair from Dec. 31, 1998 to Dec. 30, 2008. A nominal initial account value of $25,000 was used and $10 was assessed per trade for commission and slippage.

Also, to see whether a trend filter might improve performance, the pattern was tested taking long trades only when the inside day’s close was above the close 40 days ago and taking short trades only when the close was below the close 40 days ago. This rule was not optimized in any way — 40 days was simply a representative intermediate-term look-back period.

1. Execute long trade signals only if today’s close is above the close 40 days ago (Close > Close[40]).

2. Execute short trade signals only if today’s close is below the close 40 days ago (Close < Close[40]).

The signals were tested with the filter because preliminary analysis indicated performance could be enhanced by accounting for trend direction — an important factor, considering the uptrend that has dominated the EUR/USD pair for much of its existence.

Table 1 compares the results of the signals with and without the filter.

The no-filter results were profitable continued on p. 22

CURRENCY TRADER • January 2009

21

TRADING STRATEGIES continued FIGURE 1 — INSIDE OUT These signals go long when an inside day closes in the lower portion of the day's range and go short when an inside day closes in the upper portion of the range.

overall, thanks to the long trades; short trades actually lost money.

Adding the filter made a dramatic difference: Despite cutting the number of trades in half, profitability more than doubled, the maximum drawdown was reduced by nearly twothirds, short trades became profitable, and the overall winning percentage increased by nearly 10 percentage points.

The results were profitable, but only mildly so. But they support the earlier analysis that suggested there was potential in fading the direction of an inside day’s close in the EUR/USD pair — as long as the trade is not fading the prevailing intermediate-term market direction.

Now let’s look at a parallel setup that defines up-closing and downclosing days a bit differently.

Source: TradeStation

The second pattern

TABLE 2 — FADING STRONG- AND WEAK-CLOSING INSIDE DAYS The basic (unfiltered) version of this pattern performed much better than the first pattern and, again, the filter enhanced most performance measures.

Net profit Profit factor Number of trades Winning percentage

All trades no filter filter $22,905.00 $24,718.00 1.31 1.87 254 112 49.61% 59.82%

Long trades no filter filter $12,643.00 $13,546.00 1.34 2.03 130 56 47.69% 58.93%

Short trades no filter filter $10,262.00 $11,172.00 1.29 1.74 124 56 51.61% 60.71%

Avg. trade net profit Avg. winning trade Avg. losing trade Avg. win/avg. loss Longest winning streak Longest losing streak

$90.18 $762.33 -$571.48 1.33 7 10

$220.70 $791.39 -$629.00 1.26 9 5

$97.25 $803.23 -$546.43 1.47 6 6

$82.76 $722.72 -$599.87 1.2 9 9

$199.50 $773.97 -$688.32 1.12 8 3

Total commission Return on initial capital % time in market (exposure) Longest flat period

$5,080.00 91.62% 15.68% 81 Days

$2,240.00 $2,600.00 $1,120.00 98.87% 7.87% 146 Days

$2,480.00

$1,120.00

$241.89 $809.33 -$572.26 1.41 5 4

Max. drawdown -$8,430.00 -$5,000.00 -$7,291.00 -$4,115.00 -$6,900.00 % of initial capital 33.72% 20.00% 29.16% 16.46% 27.60% Net profit as % of drawdown 271.71% 494.36% 173.41% 329.19% 148.72% Source: TradeStation

22

-$4,570.00 18.28% 244.46%

This signal is based on whether the inside bar closes high or low relative to the day’s range, rather than above or below the previous day’s close. A close in the upper 35 percent of the day’s range qualifies as a strong close and triggers a short trade, while a close in the lower 35 percent of the day’s range qualifies as a weak close and triggers a long trade.

The rules are: Enter long on today’s close if: 1. If today’s high is below yesterday’s high.

2. If today’s low is above yesterday’s low.

3. If today’s close is in the bottom 35 percent of the day’s range.

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

analysis window: Dec. 28, 1998 through Dec. 28, 2001; Dec. 29, 2001 through Dec. 29, 2004; Dec. 30, 2004 through Dec. 29, 2008. In terms of the number of trades and winning percentage, the results were fairly consistent from period to period, with the exception of the negative return for long

As formulas, these rules are: 1. If High < High[1]; 2. Low > Low[1]; 3. (Close-Low)/(High-Low) <= .35;

continued on p. 24

The rules are inverted for short trades. Figure 1 shows some recent signals.

The setup was tested on daily data in the EUR/USD pair from Dec. 28, 1998 to Dec. 29, 2008, with the same account size and trade fees as the first test. Again, trades were exited after two days and the pattern was tested with and without the 40-day trend filter.

Table 2 shows the results. The pattern’s unfiltered results are better than the first pattern’s, and in almost every aspect, the filter version again performed better, especially on a riskadjusted basis. The filter cut the number of trades in half (and halved commissions and market exposure) while net profit increased slightly. Also, the balance between the maximum number of consecutive winning trades and the maximum number of consecutive losing trades tilted toward the latter without the filter; the longest winning streak far outpaced the longest losing streak with the filter.

In short, the pattern’s basic tendencies appear to be enhanced when long signals are traded when the market is up and short signals are traded when the market is down. Other methods of identifying the trend or immediate trade context have the potential to produce better results than the rudimentary rule used in this test.

One interesting detail in both patterns’ tests is the filtered versions produced slightly larger average losing trades than the unfiltered versions.

But the filtered versions’ much higher winning percentages and slightly larger winning trade values more than made up for this deficit.

Table 3 compares a few key statistics for the filtered version of the second setup in different portions of the CURRENCY TRADER • January 2009

23

TRADING STRATEGIES continued

TABLE 3 — PERIOD COMPARISON Results were relatively consistent from period to period.

All trades Long trades Short trades 12/9812/0112/0412/9812/0112/042/9812/0112/04Period 12/01 12/04 12/08 12/01 12/04 12/08 112/01 12/04 12/08 Net profit $2,500.00 $12,270.00 $11,318.00 ($1,430.00) $9,350.00 $6,196.00 $3,930.00 $2,920.00 $5,122.00 Profit factor 1.2 3.16 2.36 0.58 3.73 2.08 1.45 2.3 2.99 Number of trades 37 30 41 7 23 25 30 7 16 Winning % 54.05% 60.00% 65.85% 42.86% 60.87% 64.00% 56.67% 57.14% 68.75% Longest winning streak 9 5 5 2 5 5 8 3 5 Longest losing streak 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 Source: TradeStation

TABLE 4 — COMBINED SIGNALS

trades from the December 1998 – December 2001 window.

Short trades outperformed long trades — in terms of consistency and reliability, not net profit — in two of the three periods. This is a good thing, as it indicates the setup is not merely hitching a ride on the back of the EUR/USD’s upside bias during the majority of the analysis period. Also, the table makes clear the most recent four-year period (December 2004 – December 2008) was not the best period for the setup, although it was very positive.

For such a simple, robust setup, the results aren’t bad, and there’s plenty of room to extract more value from the pattern. First, losses were not controlled — all trades were exited after two days, win or lose. Testing indicated additional profit potential existed beyond this time horizon, but the probabilities of success decreased as time passed — i.e., winning percentages and reward-risk ratios declined, although they remained favorable.

However, taking partial profits at the two-day point (or at a price level corresponding to a high-probability profit target in the first days of the trade) and protecting the remainder of the position with a stop-loss could allow for additional profits with minimal risk.

Table 4 shows the results of combining the two filtered versions of the patterns. The results are — predictably — something of a compromise.

24

Combining the signals produced a higher net profit, but most of the reward/risk measures were not as good as the second pattern’s statistics.

Net profit Profit factor Number of trades Winning percentage

All trades $51,427.50 1.69 280 55.71%

Long trades $29,292.50 1.84 148 54.05%

Short trades $22,135.00 1.56 132 57.58%

Avg. trade net profit Avg. winning trade Avg. losing trade Avg. win/avg. loss Longest winning streak Longest losing streak

$183.67 $805.38 -$598.48 1.35 10 9

$197.92 $800.67 -$511.19 1.57 7 9

$167.69 $810.33 -$704.46 1.15 8 7

Total commission Return on initial capital % time in market (exposure) Longest flat period

$5,600.00 205.71% 12.11% 99 Days

$2,960.00

$2,640.00

Max. drawdown % of initial capital Net profit as % of drawdown

-$8,960.00 35.84% 573.97%

-$8,230.00 32.92% 355.92%

-$9,140.00 36.56% 242.18%

Source: TradeStation

Related reading “Inside days in the major currency pairs” Currency Trader, November 2008.

Analysis of inside days that occur after short-term price thrusts.

“Inside days: Part 2” Currency Trader, December 2008.

This follow-up study digs deeper into inside days and focuses on the U.S. dollar/Canadian dollar and the Euro/U.S. dollar pairs.

You can purchase and download past articles at http://store.activetradermag.com.

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

ADVANCED STRATEGIES

Let the trend be your friend: The majors Analyzing trends in the majors suggests winning trend followers must be quick on their feet to reap their rewards.

BY HOWARD L. SIMONS TABLE 1 — MAJOR CURRENCIES' SUMMARY TREND STATISTICS Two supposedly commodity-linked currencies stand out: The Canadian dollar has spent the most time trending since 1999, and the Aussie dollar has had the least excess volatility.

EUR CHF JPY GBP AUD CAD

Percent in trending state 60.2% 61.0% 64.0% 65.2% 67.6% 67.9%

Average absolute trend oscillator 0.1702 0.1659 0.1639 0.1717 0.1672 0.1545

Average excess volatility 0.0751 0.0281 0.0547 0.0867 0.0190 0.0474

FIGURE 1 — AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR During the AUD’s pronounced uptrends, the trend oscillator not only turned negative but occasionally fell into oversold territory.

26

C

urrencies long have enjoyed a reputation for trending, and with good fundamental reasons. Not only do currencies reflect longterm national policies and tendencies that are slow, if not impossible, to change (really, should we expect Switzerland and Argentina to be confused at any point?), they reflect relative monetary policies that also tend to persist.

Two cases in point: The U.S. dollar strengthened for almost five years in the first half of the 1980s after Paul Volcker instituted his policy of high interest rates. The greenback fell just as spectacularly, and for an even longer period of time, after May 2002 under the weight of a deliberate policy by the Federal Reserve to solve all economic problems with easy credit.

We can throw darts at a world map, start narrating the history of the country hit, and arrive at pretty much the same conclusion: Currencies are capable of posting massive long-term trends. And as any position trader understands intuitively, almost any trading system or set of indicators works in a trend. Markets make indicators work, not vice-versa.

Two questions arise, then. First, if this is the case then why do self-described trend-followers in currencies tend to have such mediocre performance (see “Why currency traders should be humbler,” May 2007 or “Currencies and commitments,” June 2008)? Second, which currencies are in fact trendiest?

The first question will be dismissed curtly with this bit of doggerel: “The trend is your friend, except for the bend in the end.”

Everyone can see the same trend, the trade gets crowded, and then it reverses in an execution vacuum capable of vaporizing — in a matter of hours — weeks of hard-won gains. Such is the life of a trend-follower.

The second question will be addressed for a set of six major currencies: the Canadian and Australian dollars (CAD and AUD), the Japanese yen (JPY), the Swiss franc (CHF), the January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

FIGURE 2 — CANADIAN DOLLAR Once the CAD’s bull run began, excess volatility dropped during nearly all periods of positive trend.

British pound (GBP), and the Euro (EUR). We will visit a set of minor currencies next month.

Trendiness Trends are like Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s famous definition of obscenity (“I know it when I see it”). If a market is moving in a straight line with few retracements, we all can spot the trend. But defining it is difficult. Two accepted methods of defining when a market has serial correlation of returns, or a lowerthan-expected number of day-to-day sign changes in returns, are the Durbin-Watson and Wald-Wolfowitz tests, which indicate the markets are close to being random in distribution.

This is visually counterintuitive, but just as hikers get lost when they stop trusting their compasses, traders can get lost when their lying

Almost any trading system or set of indicators works in a trend. Markets make indicators work, not vice-versa.

FIGURE 3 — BRITISH POUND The GBP’s excess volatility tends to surge much higher above 0.00 than it falls below it, and it also has the highest average level of any of the major currencies.

eyes get in the way of reality.

Other venerated technical indicators of trendiness, such as Welles Wilder’s directional movement index (DMI) and its associated average directional movement index (ADX) do a good job confirming when you are in a trend, but they tend to be slow to capture excessive movements and abrupt but significant trend changes. Moreover, the commonly used 14-day DMI period is a parameterized time period.

(Not that this does not work: I learned a good deal of technical analysis from a bombast who insisted on measuring every indicator against a simple 14-day moving average, and who took great glee when one complex tool after another failed to pass the test. There is a powerful lesson here.)

The trend oscillator For consistency, we will return to the measure used in June 2008, the adaptive moving average (AMA) system. An optimal trend speed is derived by the number of days between 4 and continued on p. 28

CURRENCY TRADER • January 2009

27

ADVANCED STRATEGIES continued FIGURE 4 — JAPANESE YEN Moves in the trend oscillator above 0.40 and below -0.40 have tended to produce fairly symmetric, mean-reverting responses in the JPY.

lator (red bars) only for trending days. The stronger the volatility-adjusted trend, the further away from zero the trend oscillator will be.

In general, trend oscillator readings greater than 0.40 or less than -0.40, marked on the trend charts with grey lines, indicate a market is becoming overbought or oversold, respectively.

The bottom charts in each figure depict the excess volatility (green bars) of each market for those days when the market is in a trending state. Excess volatility is the ratio of the implied volatility for three-month non-deliverable forwards to the high-low-close volatility. (In a small twist from past practice, we subtracted 1.00 from this ratio to depict it more intuitively as an oscillator around zero.) Excess volatility indicates the market is uncomfortable with the existing trend and is buying insurance in the form of options against its reversal. The more negative this measure is, the more the market is comfortable with the trend, and vice-versa.

Ranking the majors

29 that minimizes the function:

Where Vol is the N-day high/low/close volatility, defined as:

where H, L, and C are high, low, and close, respectively.

Once the MA is calculated, the trend is defined as the volatility-adjusted oscillator around this central tendency.

In the construction of the index, the trend’s “zero point” occurs when price and AMA are equal:

Values of N in excess of 20 define a trending market, while those less than 11 define a sideways market and those from 11 through 20 define markets in transition.

Figures 1-6 depict the daily high-low range for each of the six major currencies over all days, but show the trend oscil28

First, let’s take a look at the summary rankings in Table 1. The Canadian dollar (see “Remember the forgotten currency,” February 2006) has spent the most time in a trending state since the Jan. 4, 1999 advent of the Euro. The Australian dollar (see “What’s down with the Australian dollar?” March 2008) has the lowest average excess volatility. Both are considered to be commodity-linked currencies (see “Of commodities and currencies,” July 2006).

The AUD had two rather lengthy uptrends, one between summer 2001 and spring 2004 and another from fall 2006 through July 2008, at which point it broke sharply (Figure 1).

What is surprising is how often during its rather pronounced uptrends the oscillator not only turned negative but several times fell into oversold conditions. Visual inspection turns up nothing unusual in any of these downdrafts; in each and every case they were sharp and shortlived sell-offs within a broad uptrend. While some could (and indeed will) argue these represent buying opportunities, they also represent real loss of equity for those with long positions.

The excess volatility chart (bottom) is more interesting in many ways. During the first broad uptrend, excess volatility remained high as the AUD had been under severe downward pressure in the late 1990s. The situation reversed during the second uptrend — the currency market was very comfortable with a long AUD position. Excess volatility collapsed during the sell-off in September-October 2008, which indicated the actual severity of the AUD’s move was left uninsured by options traders.

The Canadian dollar (Figure 2) is the market most currency traders would assume was the trendiest. The CAD January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

FIGURE 5 — SWISS FRANC The Swiss franc’s reputation for long-running, pronounced trends changed after the advent of the Euro and the realignment of global currency trading into dollar bloc and Euro blocs.

had a long and powerful uptrend between the beginning of 2003 and the end of 2007, but as was the case with the AUD, it had a large number of short-lived bona fide downturns. A trendfollowing trader could — and by evidence did — get knocked out of long positions numerous times during this trend. The CAD, like the AUD, broke sharply during the SeptemberOctober 2008 credit crunch. Its break was swift and severe enough to be done without any trend reversals.

The excess volatility chart tells the real story, though. It remained quite high for the CAD during the tail end of its long bear market (extending through 2001), but once its bull run began, excess volatility dropped during nearly all periods of positive trend. Also like the AUD, its excess volatility fell sharply in the September-October 2008 sell-off.

There must be something about speaking English that is related to currency trends, as the third trendiest currency amongst the majors is the British pound (Figure 3). This is a little surprising given the GBP’s primary trade is not against the USD but rather against the Euro.

And visually the price chart is far noisier than that of either the AUD or the CAD. But let’s remember that point about hikers and their compasses and accept the data for what it is.

The most interesting aspect of the British pound here is, like the Canadian dollar, how high the excess volatility was in 1999-2002 and then how it switched to a pattern where volatility spikes tended to mark tops in price. A data-mining trading system designer (which may be a redundancy) could back-fit a trading system to sell the GBP on these volatility spikes. In addition, the GBP’s excess volatility is both highly asymmetric — it tends to surge much higher over 0.00 than it falls below it — and has the highest average level of any of the major currencies by far.

Few of us would expect the Japanese yen (Figure 4) to rank very high on any measure of trendiness, and we are not disappointed in that regard. The JPY has remained in a fairly narrow trading range since 1999, but within that range we have seen several substantial trending moves tied to global financial crises and developments in the yen carry trade (see “A closer look at the carry trade,” July 2007).

Moves in the trend oscillator outside of ±0.40 tend to produce mean-reverting responses, and as befits a long-term trading range, these moves have been fairly symmetric.

The excess volatility measure for the JPY was quite high in 2000-2001 as the Bank of Japan contemplated quantitative easing, which at the time was regarded as improbable. Once they went to the policy, excess volatility fell and remained in a narrow range until the credit crunch emerged in mid2007. When traders unwound yen carry trades in response, excess volatility fell and remained low except for a brief period in early September 2008. The market knew what it CURRENCY TRADER • January 2009

wanted to do with the yen, which was to repurchase what it had borrowed, and proceeded to do so without further ado.

The Swiss franc (see “The Swiss franc’s commodity connection,” October 2008) used to, along with the old Deutsche mark, have a reputation for long-running, pronounced trends. This changed after the advent of the Euro and the realignment of global currency trading into two broad currency blocs — the dollar bloc and the Euro bloc (see “The dollar index and ‘firm’ exchange rates,” December 2005).

Even so, the CHF remained in a broad uptrend against the USD from mid-2001 until the September-October 2008 credit crunch (Figure 5). This is evidenced by a very large number of overbought spikes on the trend oscillator against but one oversold spike in mid-2005. Also, the CHF appeared to be very comfortable within its uptrend judging by its low excess volatility measure after the Swiss National Bank ceased cutting its LIBOR target rate in mid-2003. And like other currencies, its excess volatility broke after September 2008 as the USD strengthened.

We finally come to the least trendy currency amongst the majors: the Euro. Even though it spent the first two-and-ahalf years of its history declining against the dollar and the next six years rallying — before breaking severely during the September-October 2008 credit crunch — it has had sufficient backing and filling to spend almost 40 percent of its life outside of a trending state. As the deepest and most liquid currency market in the world, the Euro tends to get very continued on p. 30

29

ADVANCED STRATEGIES continued crowded at the end of a trend and reverses suddenly. This explains why trend-followers in currencies have such a poor track record.

The excess volatility spikes since 2003 have provided clear signs as to when these reversals are coming. The market senses it has moved to an extreme, but instead of reducing trend positions, it seems content to buy option protection. We can revisit the one article on trading psychology that’s ever been written as to why this is: Greed overtakes fear when a trend gets strong.

FIGURE 6 — EURO Because it tends to get very crowded at the end of a trend, the Euro can reverse suddenly (which is why trend-followers in currencies have such a poor track record). The excess volatility spikes since 2003 have signaled when these reversals are coming.

If you’re going to follow trends, be quick about it If there is one conclusion we can take away from this study on the majors and their trends, it is the winners must be those who exit too soon. This was Bernard Baruch’s famous maxim, pre-decimalization — that he was willing to let the other fellow have the first eighth and the last eighth.

This is more important than ever now that we are in a world of one gigantic trade, with a small number of large players, the dollar-Euro, and a set of various managed floats and pegs around this central rate. Next month we will visit several minor currencies to see whether this lesson holds there, as well.

For information on the author see p. 6.

Related reading:

Other Howard Simons articles

“The rupee and emerging markets” Currency Trader, December 2008.

Analysis suggests India’s status as a global economic power is no accident.

“Getting carried away with the kiwi” Currency Trader, July 2008.

What’s driving the New Zealand dollar, and how long is it likely to last?

“Nordic currency confusion” Currency Trader, November 2008.

Get a handle on the dynamics of the Northern European currencies.

“Currencies and stock index performance” Currency Trader, April 2008.

Find out how stock indices relate to the performance of their currencies.

“The Swiss franc’s commodity connection” Currency Trader, October 2008.

How can the Swiss currency be, of all things, a commodity currency?

“What’s down with the Australian dollar?”

Currency Trader, March 2008.

Traders have many assumptions about the nature of the Australian dollar, but only one of these preconceptions appears to have any impact on the currency.

“Franc-ly, my dear, I don’t give a carry” Currency Trader, September 2008.

Investigating the Swiss franc carry trade, and what might change its dynamics.

“The short, awful life of the dollar carry trade” Currency Trader, August 2008.

The implications of the weak-dollar policy and the dollar’s roles as a funding currency.

“Currencies and commitments” Currency Trader, June 2008.

Find out what COT data conveys about forex price action.

“Currencies and U.S. stock-sector returns” Currency Trader, January 2008.

This exhaustive analysis challenges some common assumptions about the relationship between currency moves and stocks.

“Interest-rate shocks and currency moves” Currency Trader, October 2007.

Short-term interest rates are typically cited as the prime catalyst of currency moves. This study puts that idea to the test.

“Howard Simons: Advanced Currency Concepts, Vol. 1” A discounted collection that includes many of the articles listed here.

You can purchase and download past articles at http://store.activetradermag.com 30

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

SPOT CHECK

Euro relative performance The Euro story is really the dollar story…or maybe the yen story.

BY CURRENCY TRADER STAFF

T

historic global economic crisis that drove money into the U.S. dollar as a safe haven.

Figure 1 is a daily chart of the EUR/USD pair. After reaching a closing high of 1.5990 on April 22, the pair moved mostly sideways before the midJuly breakdown (it eclipsed 1.600 intraTABLE 1 — EURO VS. THE DOLLAR: ANALYZING THE OTHER PLAYERS day on three occasions during this period). The pair had shed more than 22 perIn the depths of the 2008 financial panic, the Euro lost significant ground vs. cent by the time it closed at 1.2453 on the U.S. dollar. However, it mostly gained ground vs. other major currencies Nov. 20 — a sell-off that might seem dra(except the yen): Through Dec. 17, it had double-digit gains vs. the other majors (ex-yen) — not too far behind the dollar’s performance. matic were it not for the fact that the Euro lost nearly 30 percent vs. the Japanese Apr. 22-Nov. 20 Nov. 20-Dec. 17 Apr. 22-Dec. 17 yen (JPY) during the same period (Figure Euro/dollar -22.12% 15.80% -9.82% 2).

Table 1 compares the percentage moves in the Euro and the U.S. dollar vs.

Euro vs. yen -29.03% 8.42% -23.05% the other major currencies (yen, British Euro vs. pound 5.50% 9.75% 15.78% pound, Swiss franc, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, and New Zealand dolEuro/Swiss -4.92% 1.34% -3.65% lar) during the EUR/USD’s AprilEuro vs. Canada 0.17% 7.56% 7.74% November down move and subsequent Euro vs. Aussie 20.34% 0.56% 21.02% November-December rebound.

Euro vs. kiwi 18.98% 1.96% 21.31% The overarching and intertwined themes during the fall financial panic Average: 1.84% 4.93% 6.53% were liquidation and repatriation: money o some observers, the Euro’s sharp decline vs. the dollar from July through November was a sea change — the end of the Euro’s bull run — despite the fact the move was triggered by a

Median:

2.84%

4.76%

11.76%

Avg. (ex-yen)

8.01%

4.23%

12.44%

Med. (ex-yen)

5.50%

1.96%

15.78%

Dollar vs. yen

-9.04%

-6.92%

-15.33%

Pound vs. dollar

26.19%

-5.47%

22.15%

Dollar vs. Swiss

22.08%

-12.49%

6.84%

Dollar vs. Canada

28.63%

-8.12%

18.19%

Dollar vs. Aussie

35.34%

-15.19%

25.51%

Dollar vs. kiwi

34.58%

-13.55%

25.71%

Average:

22.96%

-10.29%

13.84%

Median:

27.41%

-10.30%

20.17%

Avg. (ex-yen)

29.36%

-10.97%

19.68%

Med. (ex-yen)

28.63%

-12.49%

22.15%

32

“Euro story” has really been the “Dollar story,” or even the “Dollar/yen” story. managers and investors got out of all kinds of assets and reverted money to home-country currencies. The Japanese yen — a short-side favorite in forex carry trades because of Japan’s perennial lowinterest-rate environment — was boosted dramatically. Not only did the yen skyrocket vs. the Euro, it was also the only major currency the buck lost ground January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

FIGURE 1 — EURO/DOLLAR SEESAW The EUR/USD pair collapsed as money flooded into the “safe-haven” dollar during the fall financial panic, then rebounded sharply in late November.

against between April 20 and Nov. 20 (-9.04).

Further inspection of Table 1 suggests the “Euro story” has really been the “Dollar story,” or even the “Dollar/yen” story: The Euro was battered much more vs. the yen than the greenback, and the EUR/USD pair’s specific decline was driven by a singular economic event.

In fact, the Euro gained ground against the Australian dollar, New Zealand dollar, and British pound, held its own against the Canadian dollar, and dropped moderately vs. the Swissie. These gains overall did not compare to the U.S. dollar’s huge surges against these currencies, but they do highlight the unique dynamic that was pitting the Euro vs. the dollar in a battle it could not win.

The EUR/USD pair rebounded to the tune of nearly 16 percent from Nov. 20 to Dec. 17 on a closing basis, cutting the Euro’s total loss since Source: TradeStation April 22 to a little less than 10 percent.

Also, during this NovemberFIGURE 2 — THE YEN WILD CARD December rally, the Euro gained The EUR/JPY (top) and USD/JPY pairs both dropped as money managers ground vs. all the other major currenshort the yen had to cover their positions. The Euro lost nearly 30 percent vs. cies while the U.S. dollar gave back the yen between April and November, while the dollar — which was itself much more (a median loss of 10.30 perhurtling to the upside vs. most currencies — lost 9.04 percent. cent).

Overall, the Euro and the U.S. dollar are not too far apart when assessing the entire April 22 to Dec. 17 period, especially when the yen wild card is removed from the picture. The Euro gained an average 12.44 percent vs. the five remaining currencies (median 15.78), while the dollar gained an average 19.68 percent (median 22.15 percent).

In short, the performance underscores the EUR/USD move is about the dollar more than the Euro. But it raises the question of the importance of European Central Bank (ECB) interest-rate policy as the new year begins.

The ECB has lagged other central banks in cutting interest rates in the face of the global economic slowdown.

If it is forced to compensate, it could put a lid on the Euro’s strong rebound vs. the dollar, even if the dollar’s safeSource: TradeStation haven pop is over and done with.

CURRENCY TRADER • January 2009

33

INTERNATIONAL MARKETS CURRENCIES (vs. U.S. DOLLAR)

Currency

Current price vs.

U.S. dollar

1-month gain/loss

3-month gain/loss

6-month gain/loss

52-week high

52-week low

Previous rank

1

Swiss franc

0.93593

13.26%

4.85%

-4.60%

1.0375

0.813

15

2

Euro

1.39782

10.39%

-0.80%

-11.35%

1.6038

1.2329

5

3

Australian dollar

0.70465

8.99%

-11.33%

-26.30%

0.9849

0.6005

3

4

New Zealand dollar

0.58127

7.74%

-13.62%

-23.53%

0.8214

0.519

16

5

South African rand

0.10538

7.02%

-12.95%

-17.12%

0.1489

0.0841

1

6

Singapore dollar

0.69863

6.40%

0.24%

-4.93%

0.7434

0.6512

10

7

Swedish krona

0.12921

6.15%

-10.69%

-22.56%

0.1718

0.1152

13

8

Japanese yen

0.01103

4.35%

16.94%

16.78%

0.01148

0.00891

12

9

Thai baht

0.02923

3.25%

-1.52%

-3.08%

0.03396

0.0262

9

10

Indian rupee

0.02037

2.16%

-3.73%

-11.74%

0.03974

0.01843

2

11

Canadian dollar

0.81999

1.75%

-12.99%

-16.41%

1.0297

0.768

4

12

Taiwanese dollar

0.03044

1.57%

-2.44%

-7.48%

0.03335

0.02969

6

13

Chinese yuan

0.14677

0.87%

0.32%

0.49%

0.14677

0.1367

7

14

Hong Kong dollar

0.12904

0.02%

0.23%

0.62%

0.12904

0.1279

8

15

Brazilian real

0.42653

-0.26%

-18.25%

-31.62%

0.6414

0.3751

14

16

British pound

1.46317

-3.51%

-17.78%

-26.62%

2.0397

1.4351

17

17

Russian ruble

0.03431

-4.05%

-11.96%

-19.55%

0.04334

0.03267

11

Rank*

Country

As of Jan. 2 *based on one-month gain/loss

ACCOUNT BALANCE Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 34

Country Singapore Switzerland China Hong Kong Netherlands Taiwan Sweden Russia Germany Japan Canada Brazil

2007 41.395 65.534 379.162 22.796 55.891 25.402 25.903 72.543 175.371 195.904 25.603 10.253

Ratio* 27 15.8 11.7 11.2 7.4 6.8 6 5.9 5.4 4.5 1.8 0.8

2006 36.288 58.708 249.866 20.586 8.6 24.661 27.707 95.322 147.134 170.437 20.792 13.276

2008+

Rank

42.208 64.106 453.146 20.456 6.7 28.365 25.584 49.181 174.137 195.145 17.909 4.299

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Country Mexico France India UK Australia U.S. South Africa Spain

2007

Ratio*

2006

2008+

-6.368 -39.363 -23.131 -96.687 -50.816 -784.341 -18.495 -138.916

-0.7 -1.6 -2.1 -3.5 -5.7 -5.7 -6.7 -9.8

-2.425 -27.712 -9.503 -77.236 -41.49 -811.483 -16.608 -106.399

-10.588 -48.885 -32.301 -105.144 -52.988 -788.293 -19.237 -154.849

Totals in billions of U.S. dollars *Account balance in percent of GDP +Estimate Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, October 2008 January 2009 â&#x20AC;˘ CURRENCY TRADER

NON-U.S. DOLLAR FOREX CROSS RATES Rank

Currency pair

1 Franc / Pound 2 Aussie $ / Pound 3 Franc / Canada $ 4 Franc / Yen 5 Aussie $ / Canada $ 6 Euro / Yen 7 Canada $ / Pound 8 Aussie $ / Yen 9 Franc / Euro 10 Aussie $ / Euro 11 Real / Canada $ 12 Canada $ / Yen 13 Real / Pound 14 Aussie $ / Franc 15 Real / Yen 16 Pound / Yen 17 Canada $ / Euro 18 Real / Aussie $ 19 Real / Euro 20 Pound / Euro

Symbol

Jan. 2

1-month gain/loss

3-month gain/loss

6-month gain/loss

52-week high

52-week low

Previous

CHF/GBP AUD/GBP CHF/CAD CHF/JPY AUD/CAD EUR/JPY CAD/GBP AUD/JPY CHF/EUR AUD/EUR BRL/CAD CAD/JPY BRL/GBP AUD/CHF BRL/JPY GBP/JPY CAD/EUR BRL/AUD BRL/EUR GBP/EUR

0.64025 0.48224 1.14413 85.05881 0.86141 126.772 0.56117 63.84087 0.66983 0.50347 0.52142 74.39076 0.2919 0.75374 38.69557 132.729 0.58704 0.60659 0.30536 1.04714

17.46% 13.07% 11.50% 8.78% 7.30% 5.80% 5.56% 4.36% 2.62% -1.40% -1.81% -2.45% 3.47% -3.70% -4.38% -7.51% -7.78% -8.36% -9.60% -12.57%

27.61% 7.96% 20.75% -10.14% 2.12% -15.16% 5.93% -24.24% 5.74% -10.73% -5.85% -25.57% -0.47% -15.36% -30.06% -29.66% -12.24% -7.64% -17.54% -17.09%

30.11% 0.56% 14.36% -18.12% -11.65% -24.07% 14.05% -36.94% 7.66% -16.98% -18.02% -28.39% -6.70% -22.67% -41.41% -37.14% -5.64% -7.04% -22.81% -17.20%

0.661 0.4895 1.1583 105.071 0.9833 169.958 0.5663 104.448 0.6992 0.6278 0.6719 112.316 0.339 1.0095 69.3981 222.668 0.6907 0.7391 0.4197 1.3618

0.4434 0.3786 0.8796 74.698 0.7568 113.614 0.4874 55.1876 0.6038 0.4725 0.4726 71.9892 0.2441 0.712 36.0109 129.816 0.5799 0.5991 0.2941 1.0195

9 1 18 13 10 6 2 4 17 8 16 5 7 3 12 14 11 19 15 20

GLOBAL STOCK INDICES Rank

Country

Index

1 Mexico IPC 2 Brazil Bovespa 3 India BSE 30 4 Japan Nikkei 225 5 Hong Kong Hang Seng 6 Singapore Straits Times 7 UK FTSE 100 8 South Africa FTSE/JSE All Share 9 U.S. S&P 500 10 Germany Xetra Dax 11 Canada S&P/TSX composite 12 France CAC 40 13 Italy MIBTel 14 Switzerland Swiss Market 15 Australia All ordinaries

Jan. 2

1-month gain/loss

3-month gain/loss

6-month gain/loss

52-week high

52-week low

Previous

23,250.96 40,244.00 9,958.22 8,859.56 15,042.81 1,829.71 4,561.80 21,764.90 931.80 4,973.07 8,987.70 3,349.69 15,096.00 5,533.60 3,201.50

17.42% 14.98% 13.95% 12.66% 12.21% 11.62% 10.65% 10.40% 9.78% 9.74% 7.92% 6.24% 1.01% -0.07% -7.83%

-3.23% -12.79% -20.50% -20.58% -17.40% -22.59% -6.33% -3.53% -16.38% -12.15% -17.55% -15.48% -21.54% -17.79% -32.94%

-18.93% -34.14% -27.12% -33.32% -30.69% -37.04% -15.93% -25.73% -26.14% -21.13% -35.96% -22.04% -32.62% -19.14% -38.57%

32,292.90 73,920.00 21,206.80 15,156.70 27,637.60 3,437.79 6,534.70 33,323.89 1,444.01 7,923.44 15,154.80 5,567.09 29,143.00 8,385.40 6,421.20

16,480.00 29,435.00 7,697.39 6,994.90 10,676.30 1,473.77 3,665.20 17,814.42 741.02 4,014.60 7,647.11 2,838.50 14,029.00 5,034.40 3,201.50

10 13 12 15 14 11 2 3 6 9 8 5 7 1 4

GLOBAL SHORT-TERM INTEREST RATES Country U.S. Japan Eurozone UK Canada Switzerland Australia New Zealand Brazil Korea Taiwan India South Africa

Interest rate Fed funds rate Overnight call rate Refi rate Repo rate Overnight funding rate 3-month Swiss Libor Cash rate Cash rate Selic rate Overnight call rate Discount rate Repo rate Repurchase rate

Rate (%) 0-0.25 0.1 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 4.25 5 13.75 3 2 5.5 11.5

Last change 0.5 (Dec. 08) 0.2 (Dec. 08) 0.75 (Dec. 08) 1.00 (Dec. 08) 0.75 (Dec. 08) 0.5 (Dec. 08) 1.00 (Dec. 08) 1.50 (Dec. 08) 0.75 (Sept. 08) 1.00 (Dec. 08) 0.75 (Dec. 08) 1.00 (Jan. 09) 0.5 (Dec. 08)

July 08 2 0.5 4.25 5 3 2.75 7.25 8 13 5 3.625 9 12

Jan. 08 3 0.5 4 5.5 4 2.75 6.75 8.25 11.25 5 3.375 7.75 11

GLOBAL BOND RATES Rank 1 2 3 4 5

Country Germany UK U.S. Australia Japan

Rate BUND Short sterling 10-year T-note 10-year bonds Government Bond

CURRENCY TRADER â&#x20AC;˘ January 2009

Jan. 2

125.28 98.28 124.3 96.04 139.75

1-month 1.47% 1.42% 1.24% 0.40% -0.15%

3-month 8.26% 3.99% 7.62% 1.47% 1.67%

6-month 13.76% 4.60% 8.83% 2.79% 3.85%

High 125.56 98.32 128.65 96.05 141.9

Low 109.65 93.595 111.15 93.18 132.09

Previous 1 5 2 4 3

35

INTERNATIONAL MARKETS continued Gross Domestic Product*

AMERICAS Argentina Brazil Canada EUROPE France Germany UK

Period

Release date

Change

1-year change

Next release

Q3 Q3 Q3

12/18 12/9 12/1

-5.1% 1.8% 1.2%

19.1% 6.8% 6.3%

3/18 3/10 3/2

Q3 Q3 Q3

11/14 11/13 12/23

0.5% 0.0% -0.3%

2.6% 2.2% 2.3%

2/13 2/13 3/27

AFRICA S. Africa

Period

Release date

Change

1-year change

Next release

Q3

11/25

4.1%

15.5%

2/24

12/3 11/14 11/28 11/17 11/21

0.1% 6.3% 1.2% -0.5% 0.9%

1.9% 3.8% 18.7% -2.1% 1.7%

3/4 2/25 2/27 NLT 2/17 NLT 2/27

ASIA AND SOUTH PACIFIC Australia Q3 Hong Kong Q3 India Q3 Japan Q3 Singapore Q3

* Final estimates, at current prices, seasonally adjusted

Unemployment

AMERICAS Argentina Brazil Canada EUROPE France Germany UK

Period

Release date

Rate

1-year Change change

Next release

Q3 Nov. Nov.

12/22 12/19 12/5

7.8% 7.6% 6.3%

-0.2% 0.1% 0.1%

-0.3% -0.6% 0.4%

2/25 1/22 1/9

Q3 12/4 Oct. 11/27 Aug.-Oct. 12/17

7.7% 7.1% 6.0%

0.1% 0.0% 0.2%

-0.5% -1.0% 0.7%

3/5 1/7 1/21

Period

Release date

ASIA AND SOUTH PACIFIC Australia Nov. 12/6 Hong Kong Sept.-Nov 12/18 Japan Nov. 12/26 Singapore Q3 10/31

Rate

1-year Next Change change release

4.3% 3.8% 3.9% 2.2%

0.0% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0%

0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.5%

1/15 1/19 1/30 1/30

CPI

AMERICAS Argentina Brazil Canada EUROPE France Germany UK

Period

Release date

Change

1-year change

Next release

Nov. Nov. Nov.

12/10 12/5 12/19

0.4% 0.4% -0.3%

7.9% 6.4% 2.0%

1/13 1/9 1/23

Nov. Nov. Nov.

12/16 12/17 12/16

-0.5% -0.5% -0.1%

1.6% 1.4% 4.1%

1/14 1/15 1/20

AFRICA S. Africa

Period

Release date

Change

1-year change

Next release

Nov.

12/17

0.1%

11.8%

1/28

10/22 12/22 12/31 12/26 12/23

1.2% 1.8% 0.0% -0.9% -0.3%

5.0% 3.1% 10.4% 1.0% 5.5%

1/28 1/22 1/30 1/30 1/23

Period

Release date

Change

1-year change

Next release

Nov.

12/18

-1.3%

12.6%

1/29

10/20 12/12 12/12 12/10 12/30

2.0% -1.2% -1.8% -1.9% -10.2%

5.6% 5.5% 8.6% 2.8% -12.8%

1/27 3/13 1/9 1/15 1/30

ASIA AND SOUTH PACIFIC Australia Q3 Hong Kong Nov. India Nov. Japan Nov. Singapore Nov.

PPI

AMERICAS Argentina Brazil Canada EUROPE France Germany UK

Period

Release date

Change

1-year change

Next release

Nov. Nov. Oct.

12/10 12/8 11/28

-0.3% -0.2% -12.5%

9.8% 12.9% -0.2%

1/13 1/7 1/6

Nov. Nov. Nov.

12/22 12/19 12/8

-1.9% -1.5% -0.7%

1.6% 5.3% 5.1%

1/30 1/21 1/9

AFRICA S. Africa

ASIA AND SOUTH PACIFIC Australia Q3 Hong Kong Q3 India Nov. Japan Nov. Singapore Nov.

LEGEND: Change: Change from previous report release. NLT: No later than. Rate: Unemployment rate.

As of Dec. 31 36

January 2009 â&#x20AC;˘ CURRENCY TRADER

ads0908

7/15/08

1:28 PM

Page 39

FOREX NEWS

Rate cuts fuel deflation fears The Fed lowered its target rate to a historic low as consumer prices plummet — along with the U.S. dollar.

T

he Fed cut its target federal funds rate on Dec. 16 to a range from 0 percent to 0.25 percent.

“They’re acknowledging reality,” says Joseph Trevisani, chief market analyst for New Jersey-based forex broker FX Solutions. “Everybody knows the effective rate has been there for some time.”

The historic low came at a time when inflation was decreasing at record levels, bringing on new worries about the risk of deflation. November Consumer Price Index (CPI) data, also released on Dec. 16, showed a 1.7-percent drop. This drop was preceded by a 1.0-percent drop in October.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) attributes much of this drop to the

decline in energy prices. In November alone the BLS’s energy index fell 17 percent, capping four months of decreases and doubling the October drop. The next-largest declines occurred in transportation, which fell 9.8 percent in November, and housing, which fell 0.1 percent.

Nonetheless, the November CPI was 1.1 percent higher than the November 2007 reading. However, the 12-month change in July was at 5.6 percent, when crude oil prices were at their peak.

Looking beyond the energy factor, Trevisani says the real type of deflation the Fed should be fearful of is the “feedback loop.”

“Prices fall and then people expect them to fall so they hold off purchas-

ing. This drops consumption, which drops employment,” Trevisani says.

Companies try to combat muted consumption by lowering prices and employing fewer workers.

Unemployment in turn perpetuates less consumption, further fueling the

FIGURE 1 — USD/JPY USD fell to a 13-year low vs. JPY the day after the Fed cut rates to its lowest level ever.

Managed money: Barclay Trading Group’s currency trader rankings for November 2008 Top 10 currency traders managing more than $10 million as of Nov. 30, ranked by November 2008 return.

Rank Trading advisor 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Auriel Currency 2X Fund Plimsoll Capital (Headwind) Goldman Sachs (Fund. Currency) John W. Henry & Co. (Int'l. FX) Sunrise Cap'l Partners (Currency Fund) Hathersage (Long Term Currency) Geo Economic Mgmt. System Ltd Spot Forex Mgmt. (Geneva) Capricorn Advisory Mgmt (fxST Aggres.) arsago Premium Currencies

November return

2008 YTD return

$ Under mgmt. (millions)

5.76% 5.30% 4.65% 4.17% 2.57% 2.50% 2.29% 2.12% 2.05% 1.84%

-15.56% 15.14% 20.67% 76.09% 16.35% 8.99% 16.37% 9.97% 5.88% 2.57%

433.1 22.1 310.0 29.1 29.2 362.1 43.1 12.0 62.0 181.2

Top 10 currency traders managing less than $10 million and more than $1 million as of Nov. 30, ranked by November 2008 return.

1. Wallwood Consultants (Forex) 13.66% -42.66% 2. Spot Forex Mgmt. (Lausanne) 8.83% 46.81% 3. Spot Forex Mgmt. (Zurich) 4.36% 21.64% 4. Zone Cap'l FX Managed Account 4.18% 16.35% 5. Aspect Capital (Gl. Currency) 3.10% -4.26% 6. Swing Capital (FX) 2.03% 25.68% 7. Capricorn Advisory Mgmt (fxMT Growth) 1.62% 4.65% 8. Ketch Capital Management (Tack Fund) 1.54% 0.25% 9. Coe Capital Advisors (FX) 1.02% 5.53% 10. Quiddity (FX) 0.92% -6.99%

FIGURE 2 — EUR/USD The Euro rose significantly against the dollar in the days surrounding the December Fed rate cut.

2.0 4.0 6.5 1.2 5.0 6.5 1.0 4.0 4.3 7.0

Source: BarclayHedge (http://www.barclayhedge.com). Based on estimates of the composite of all accounts or the fully funded subset method. Does not reflect the performance of any single account.

PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE. 38

Source: eSignal

Source: eSignal

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

CURRENCY FUTURES SNAPSHOT

The information does NOT constitute trade signals. It is intended only to provide a brief synopsis of each market’s liquidity, direction, and levels of momentum and volatility. See the legend for explanations of the different fields.

as of Jan. 2

Market

Symbol Exchange Volume

OI

10-day move/% rank

20-day move/% rank

60-day move/% rank

Volatility ratio/rank

Eurocurrency EC CME 153.0 124.9 -3.42% / 100% 9.27% / 62% 1.25% / 63% .16 / 43% Japanese yen JY CME 77.2 112.1 -4.58% / 100% 1.02% / 3% 9.60% / 37% .14 / 0% British pound BP CME 54.4 85.9 -6.44% / 100% -1.86% / 6% -17.45% / 78% .13 / 8% Swiss franc SF CME 27.8 30.6 -0.29% / 0% 12.54% / 71% 5.05% / 82% .37 / 77% Canadian dollar CD CME 26.1 60.1 -1.24% / 50% 3.87% / 67% -9.16% / 49% .08 / 0% Australian dollar AD CME 23.5 47.2 1.55% / 16% 10.03% / 83% -1.24% / 2% .16 / 58% Mexican peso MP CME 4.2 26.7 -4.30% / 92% -2.50% / 27% -12.17% / 27% .14 / 48% U.S. dollar index DX ICE 4.1 23.3 2.72% / 100% -4.32% / 43% 1.77% / 12% .09 / 0% New Zealand dollar NE CME 1.2 14.0 -0.80% / 50% 10.43% / 100% -7.24% / 16% .12 / 2% E-Mini eurocurrency ZE CME 2.4 1.8 -3.42% / 100% 9.27% / 62% 1.25% / 50% .16 / 43% Note: Average volume and open interest data includes both pit and side-by-side electronic contracts (where applicable). Price activity is based on pit-traded contracts.

LEGEND: Volume: 30-day average daily volume, in thousands.

OI: 30-day open interest, in thousands.

10-day move: The percentage price move from the close 10 days ago to today’s close.

20-day move: The percentage price move from the close 20 days ago to today’s close.

60-day move: The percentage price move from the close 60 days ago to today’s close.

The “% rank” fields for each time window (10-day moves, 20-day moves, etc.) show the percentile rank of the most recent move to a certain number of the

downward spiral.

“But for the moment, I don’t see that happening,” he says.

A down dollar Both the Euro and the Japanese yen rallied for five straight days surrounding the Fed rate cut. From Dec. 11 through Dec. 17 the U.S. dollar (Figure 1) fell 5.9 percent against the yen, hitting a 13-year low on Dec. 17.

On Dec. 19 the Bank of Japan lowered its interest rate to 0.1 percent, its lowest point since the country ended

previous moves of the same size and in the same direction. For example, the % rank for 10-day move shows how the most recent 10-day move compares to the past twenty 10-day moves; for the 20-day move, the % rank field shows how the most recent 20-day move compares to the past sixty 20-day moves; for the 60-day move, the % rank field shows how the most recent 60-day move compares to the past onehundred-twenty 60-day moves. A reading of 100% means the current reading is larger than all the past readings, while a reading of 0% means the current reading is lower than the previous readings.

Volatility ratio/% rank: The ratio is the short-term

its five-year zero-rate policy in 2006.

December capped a year in which the U.S. dollar/Japanese yen (USD/JPY) fell 19 percent, the pair’s largest annual drop in more than 20 years.

The Euro (Figure 2) gained 10.7 percent against the dollar during the same time period, rallying 10 percent in December, the Euro/U.S. dollar’s (EUR/USD) largest monthly gain in 30 years. The December gain occurred after the Euro lost more than 20 percent against the dollar from July through November.

Outrageous predictions

O

n Dec. 17, London-based Saxo Bank released their annual “outrageous claims” for the year ahead, an attempt to predict rare but high-impact events that could occur in the year to come.

Among the predictions for 2009 were that the EUR/USD pair could fall to 0.95 and then go as high as 1.30 as the European Central Bank CURRENCY TRADER • January 2009

attempts to deal with the economic troubles of its member states.

Saxo also predicts 2009 could see the first Asian currencies pegged to the Chinese yuan, and that Asian economies will “look toward China to find new trade partners and scale down their hitherto U.S.-centric agenda.”

39

volatility (10-day standard deviation of prices) divided by the long-term volatility (100-day standard deviation of prices). The % rank is the percentile rank of the volatility ratio over the past 60 days.

This information is for educational purposes only.

Currency Trader provides this data in good faith, but assumes no responsibility for the use of this information. Currency Trader does not recommend buying or selling any market, nor does it solicit orders to buy or sell any market. There is a high level of risk in trading, especially for traders who use leverage.

The reader assumes all responsibility for his or her actions in the market.

NEW PRODUCTS & SERVICES

Tradingpatterns.com

released version 7 of Automatic Pattern Search (APS), which has a redesigned search engine and results displays that include additional performance parameters. APS discovers trading systems based on price patterns that fulfill user-defined performance statistics and risk/reward parameters by searching historical data. Technical traders can use APS to develop and analyze stock, futures, and forex trading systems based on price patterns. APS generates code for implementing the price patterns it discovers in other popular programs, such as Metastock, Tradestation, Wealth-Lab, and TeleChart.

ICAP, an interdealer broker, and Prism Valuation, a

provider of mark-to-market and valuations services, final-

ized an agreement to allow Prism Valuation to use ICAP data as the main underlying source of OTC information for its services. The agreement covers a broad range of OTC data generated from ICAP’s interdealer broker activities and will be used to assist in the valuation of complex structured products. Prism Valuation provides transparent valuations for complex OTC derivatives and structured products including interest rates, forex, inflation, equities, credit, commodities, and hybrids.

Note: New Products and Services is a forum for industry businesses to announce new products and upgrades. Listings are adapted from press releases and are not endorsements or recommendations from the Active Trader Magazine Group. E-mail press releases to editorial@currencytradermag.com.

Publication is not guaranteed.

EVENTS Event: The World Money Show

Event: Second Annual Conference on Institutional

Date: Feb. 4-7 Location: Orlando

Options Trading

Date: March 17-19 Location: Hong Kong

Date: March 10

Date: May 11-14 Location: Las Vegas

Location: New York City

For more information: Go to

For more information: http://www.fmwonline.com

http://www.moneyshow.com and click on “Events” Event: Live Trading Software and Trading Expos Event: International Trader’s Expo

Date: April 5-7 Location: Miami

Date: Feb. 21-24

Date: June 7-9 Location: Houston

Location: New York, New York

For more information: http://livetradingexpo.com

For more information: http://www.tradersexpo.com Event: The 15th Forbes Cruise for Investors Event: Securities Operations World 2009

Date: June 2-14

Date: Feb. 24

Location: Lisbon to Venice

Location: New York City

For more information: Go to

For more information: http://www.fmwonline.com

http://www.moneyshow.com and click on “Events”

Event: 25th Annual Risk Management Conference

Event: International Trader’s Expo

Date: March 8-10

Date: June 3-6

Location: The Ritz-Carlton, Laguna Niguel,

Location: Los Angeles

Dana Point, Calif.

For more information: http://www.tradersexpo.com

For more information: http://www.cboermc.com

40

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

GLOBAL ECONOMIC CALENDAR

JANUARY/FEBRUARY

Legend LTD (last trading day): The final day trading can take place in a futures or options contract.

January

FDD (first delivery day): The first day on which delivery of a commodity in fulfillment of a futures contract can take place.

21

policy announcement

1 2

Germany: December PPI U.S.: December ISM report

3

FND (first notice day): Also known as first intent day, this is the first day on which a clearinghouse can give notice to a buyer of a futures contract that it intends to deliver a commodity in fulfillment of a futures contract.

The clearinghouse also informs the seller.

4

CPI: Consumer price index

7

Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil monetary

UK: Sept.-Nov. employment report

22

U.S.: December housing starts Brazil: December employment report Japan: Bank of Japan monetary

5 6

policy announcement U.S.: December ISM non-manufacturing

Hong Kong: December CPI

report and FOMC minutes

Mexico: Jan. 15 CPI

Canada: November PPI

23

Brazil: December PPI

24

Germany: November employment report

ECB: European Central Bank FOMC: Federal Open Market Committee

8

Mexico: Dec. 31 CPI and December PPI

GDP: Gross domestic product

9

U.S.: December employment report

Canada: December CPI

25 26

U.S.: December leading indicators

Brazil: December CPI

27

Australia: Q4 PPI

PMI: Purchasing managers index

Canada: December employment report

28

Australia: Q4 CPI

PPI: Producer price index

UK: December PPI

Economic Release time release (U.S.) (ET) GDP 8:30 a.m.

CPI 8:30 a.m.

ECI 8:30 a.m.

PPI 8:30 a.m.

ISM 10:00 a.m.

Unemployment 8:30 a.m.

Personal income 8:30 a.m.

Durable goods 8:30 a.m.

Retail sales 8:30 a.m.

Trade balance 8:30 a.m.

Leading indicators 10 a.m.

LTD: January currency options (CME);

ISM: Institute for supply management

India: December PPI

1

2

4

8

9 10

7

11

South Africa: December PPI

30

12

U.S.: Q4 GDP (adv.) and ECI France: December PPI

13

U.S.: November trade balance

India: December CPI

14

U.S.: December retail sales

Japan: December employment report

France: December CPI

and CPI

15

U.S.: December PPI ECB: Monetary policy announcement Germany: December CPI

16

25 26 27 28 29 30 31

31

FEBRUARY 2009

1

U.S.: December CPI

2

U.S.: December personal income

3

Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia

Mexico: Bank of Mexico monetary policy

17

1

2

3

7

8

9

10 11 12 13 14

18

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

19

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

January 2009 â&#x20AC;˘ CURRENCY TRADER

U.S.: January ISM report

5 Hong Kong: Oct.-Dec. employment Mexico: December employment report

The information on this page is subject to change. Currency Trader is not responsible for the accuracy of calendar dates beyond press time.

monetary policy announcement

4

report

20

February

Japan: December PPI

announcement

6

Canada: December PPI Germany: December employment report

3

18 19 20 21 22 23 2 4

5

and December durable goods

10

11 12 13 14 15 16 1 7

4

U.S.: FOMC monetary policy statement

Australia: December employment report

28 29 30 31 6

29

U.S. Dollar Index futures (ICE)

January 2009 5

South Africa: December CPI

6

U.S.: January employment report Brazil: January CPI Canada: January employment report

Canada: Bank of Canada monetary

UK: January PPI

policy announcement

LTD: February currency options (CME);

UK: December CPI

February U.S. Dollar Index futures

41

KEY CONCEPTS

Average and median: The mean (or average) of a set of

The squared differences are used (instead of just the dif-

values is the sum of the values divided by the number of

ferences) because some differences are negative (for points

values in the set. If a set consists of 10 numbers, add them

below the line) and others are positive (for points above the

and divide by 10 to get the mean.

line). Squaring all the differences creates all-positive values

A statistical weakness of the mean is that it can be dis-

and allows you to calculate a formula for the straight line.

torted by exceptionally large or small values. For example,

The “best-fit” line is the line for which the sum of the

the mean of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 200 is 28.5 (228/8). Take

squared differences between each price and the straight line

away 200, and the mean of the remaining seven numbers is

are minimized.

4, which is much more representative of the numbers in this set than 28.5.

The median can help gauge how representative a mean

The formula for a straight line (y) is: y = a + b*t

where,

really is. The median of a data set is its middle value (when

t = time

the set has an odd number of elements) or the mean of the

a = the initial value of the line when “t” is equal to zero

middle two elements (when the set has an even number of

(sometimes called the “intercept” value — i.e., the

elements). The median is less susceptible than the mean to

point at which the line intercepts the vertical y-axis)

distortion from extreme, non-representative values. The

or the point at which a specific line begins

median of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 200 is 4.5 ((4+5)/2), which is much more in line with the majority of numbers in the set.

Carry trades involve buying (or lending) a currency with a high interest rate and selling (or borrowing) a cur-

b = the slope of the line, which is the rate at which the line rises or falls (e.g., 0.75 points per day).

When fitting a straight line to N data points, the “best-fit” coefficients a and b can be solved for by:

rency with a low interest rate. Traders looking to “earn carry” will buy a high-yielding currency while simultane-

N

N

N

t=1

t=1

b = [12/N(N2 –1)] ∑t*p(t) - [6/N(N-1)]∑p(t)

than the preceding bar. By definition, an inside bar represents a volatility contraction from the preceding bar.

t=1

t=1

ously selling a low-yielding currency.

Inside bar: A price bar with a lower high and higher low

N

a = [2(2N+1)/N(N-1)] ∑p(t) + [6/(N(N-1)] ∑t*p(t)

where, p(t) = the price at point t

Linear regression (“best-fit”) line: A way to calculate a straight line that best fits a set of data (such as closing

N = the number of prices we are using to calculate the coefficients.

prices over a certain period) — that is, a line that most accurately reflects the slope, or trend, of the data.

Volatility: The level of price movement in a market.

A regression line is calculated using the “least squares”

Historical (“statistical”) volatility measures the price fluctu-

method, which refers to finding the minimum squared (x*x,

ations (usually calculated as the standard deviation of clos-

x 2)

differences between price points and a straight line.

ing prices) over a certain time period — e.g., the past 20

For example, if two closing prices are 2 and 3 points away

days. Implied volatility is the current market estimate of

(the distance being calculated vertically) from a straight

future volatility as reflected in the level of option premi-

line, the squared differences between the points and the line

ums. The higher the implied volatility, the higher the option

are 4 and 9, respectively.

premium.

or

42

January 2009 • CURRENCY TRADER

FOREX TRADE JOURNAL One big loser wipes out two winners.

TRADE Date: Nov. 25, Nov. 26, and Dec. 11, 2008.

Short the Euro/U.S. dollar (EUR/USD) at 1.2954, 1.3064, and 1.3022.

Entry:

pair

Reason(s) for trade/setup: These signals were

the most recent results of the strategy based on the setup described in “Short-term momentum signals in the Euro” (Currency Trader, May 2008), “Euro momentum system, interrupted” (Currency Trader, June 2008), and “Euro momentum signal, tweaked” (Currency Trader, July 2008). The system goes short when a short-term momentum calculation is strong relative to a bullish longer-term momentum calculation. In this case, the 10-day momentum indicator (ranging from -1.00 to +1.00) had to be greater than or equal to 0.80 while the 62day momentum was below -0.6.

Note: These signals were not actually executed in the market, so the results are shown for the following parameters: a 0.0240-point profit target (a representative value found in testing) and a move above the high of the entry bar as the stop-loss. In both cases, the exits are executed on the close of the bar that the condition is triggered on.

Initial stop: A close above the high of the entry bar, estimated as 1.3081 (for the first two entries) and 1.3406 (for the third entry) in the Trade Summary table.

Initial target: The first close 0.0240 or more below the entry price (estimated as 1.2754, 1.2864, and 1.2822 in the table).

RESULT Exit: 1.2689 (first trade and second trades); 1.3721 (third

trade).

Profit/loss: +0.0265 (first trade); +0.0375 (second trade); -0.0699 (third trade).

Trade executed according to plan? Yes. Outcome: The first two trades were exited on Nov. 28 at a

Source: TradeStation

better-than-estimated price, thanks to the relatively big down move and low close on that day.

The third trade wiped out the accumulated profit — and then some — as the Euro began what turned out to be a very strong upside reaction that peaked in mid-December.

While the approach of exiting on the close helped performance on the winning trades, it was disastrous in the case of the losing trade.

Despite the two profitable trades, these results underscore a previously discussed weakness: The signals often come early and executing trades based on the opens and closes of the bars (rather than specific intrabar price levels) can put trades at a disadvantage. Past trades based on these signals from previous Trade Journals have used discretion to counter these problems. Further research should be conducted to see if these modifications can be applied systematically for future use.

Also, like any signal of this type, the system is vulnerable to bad signals when a market transitions from uptrend to downtrend, or makes an outsized move in either direction.

Note: Initial trade targets are typically based on things such as the historical performance of a price pattern or a trading system signal. However, because individual trades are dictated by immediate circumstances, price targets are flexible and are often used as points at which to liquidate a portion of a trade to reduce exposure. As a result, initial (pre-trade) rewardrisk ratios are conjectural by nature.

TRADE SUMMARY Date

Contract

11/25/08 EUR/USD 11/26/08 12/11/08

Entry

Initial stop

Initial target

IRR

Exit

1.2954 1.3064 1.3022

1.3081 1.3081 1.3406

1.2754 1.2864 1.2822

1.18 11.76 0.52

1.2689 1.2689 1.3721

Date

P/L

11/28/08 +0.0265 (2%) 11/28/08 +0.0375 (2.9%) 12/15/08 -0.0699 (-5.4%)

LOP

LOL

Trade length

0.0393 0.0503 —

-0.0126 -0.0006 -0.0699

3 days 2 days 2 days

Legend: IRR — initial reward/risk ratio (initial target amount/initial stop amount); LOP — largest open profit (maximum available profit during lifetime of trade); LOL — largest open loss (maximum potential loss during life of trade).

CURRENCY TRADER • January 2009

43

THIS MONTH’S ADVERTISERS

Click on these boxes to link directly to these advertisers’ Web sites