Multipurpose Performing Art and Entertainment Center
October 16, 2018
Table of Contents I. Legal Update II. Project History III. Recording Our History IV.Next Steps V. Downtown – Quality of Life (future) VI. Economic Development (future) 2
Legal Update 3
MPC Related Lawsuits 1205 Lawsuit (filed May 2, 2017)
Antiquities Code Lawsuit (filed July 31, 2017)
Appeal – 1205 3COA (Austin) Pending Ruling
Appeal – Antiquities Code 2COA (Ft. Worth) Appeal Dismissed & Remanded to Trial Ct. 384th
Initiative Lawsuit (filed June 12,2018)
Writs of Mandamus TXSC – Denied. 4COA (San Antonio) – Denied. Trial Ct. 171st Pending
4
1205 Lawsuit – Recent Updates (1)September 12, 2018 - Oral Arguments: Wallace Jefferson presented arguments on behalf of the City. (2)October 2, 2018 – Cross-Appellants filed Post – Submission Brief: Cross-Appellants (Antonia Flores Morales, et. al.) filed a post-submission brief. (3)October 4, 2018 – City filed Motion for Leave to file a Post-Submission Brief : Brief addressed status of Antiquities Code Lawsuit. • Final opinion may take up to 6 months. After opinion is issued, either party may petition TSCS for review. 5
Antiquities Code Lawsuit - Recent Updates The 2COA dismissed the appeal and remanded to Trial Ct. Litigation resumes at the trial level, with Hon. Judge Patrick Garcia, of the 384th Dist. Ct. The City has filed the following motions:
Antiquities Code (1) September 27, 2018 - Status Report: Detailing City’s Lawsuit (El Paso) coordination and compliance with the THC. (2) September 27, 2018 - Motion to Dissolve Temporary Agreed Order. (3) October 4, 2018 – Plea to the Jurisdiction with Respect to Plaintiff’s Declaratory Judgment Cause of Action. 6
Two Writs of Mandamus (Initiative Petition) Original Mandamus Proceeding In Re Max Grossman (Case No. 04-18-00572-CV)
Original Mandamus Proceeding In Re Max Grossman (Cause No. 18-0774)
Originally Filed 08/10/18 – 8COA Transferred on 08/15/18- 4COA
Filed 08/20/18 - TXSC
COA4 Denied Writ on August 16, 2018
TXSC Denied Writ on August 27, 2018
Matter is now pending in the trial court, 171st Dist. Ct., Hon. Judge Rangel 7
Project History Purpose and need Alternatives Resources and Mitigating Impacts
8
Background Inclusion for over 17 years Site Assessment
2012 Quality of Life Bond
Multiple studies conducted Transparency to the community on the downtown location as the site 2001 CH Johnson Report “Arena and Sports Complex Feasibility� 2006 Community Meetings for El Paso Downtown 2015 Plan
72% voters in favor of Bond issuance Public outreach 2014 Campaign from February-July Ordinance sited downtown as the location for the center
9
Project Timeline
1996-2006
• “Arena and Sports Complex Feasibility” CH Johnson report 2001 • El Paso Downtown Plan 2006 • 4 Community meetings for El Paso Downtown 2015 Plan
El Paso Downtown 2015 Plan (2006) 10
Project Timeline
2006-2012
• Plan El Paso 2012 • May – action on proposed bond election. • June – Presentation of the Downtown Sports Complex Study • August – City Council approves ordinance calling for bond election • November – Quality of Life bond proposal approved
11
Project Timeline
2014-2016
• HKS engaged to initiate site selection • 9 community project briefings • City Council and BOAC presentations, CPC agenda, Executive Session at Council, HLC Briefing • Council selects Union Plaza as the site for the MPC
12
Sites and Property Costs 4 Sites Considered as options Union Plaza (Cultural), Initial Estimate: $13-21 M RR Property (Civic), Initial Estimate: $18M plus costs to relocate City 3/4 Total Cost for Acquisition to Date: $12M +/-
HKS Study
13
Property Costs Property
Acquisition cost
215 W Paisano
$
2,188,550.00
220 Overland
$
598,500.00
216 Overland 308 Chihuahua 312 Chihuahua
$
412,925.00
305 Chihuahua
$
315,000.00
309 Chihuahua
$
180,000.00
315 Chihuahua
$
315,000.00
321 Chihuahua
$
270,000.00
325 Chihuahua
$
160,000.00
301 W Paisano
$
1,067,850.00
224 Overland
$
262,900.00
212 Overland
$
855,000.00
307 Santa Fe
$
1,527,550.00
309 Santa Fe
$
832,000.00
325 Santa Fe
$
1,292,000.00
306 Overland**
$
462,000.00
Chihuahua Private alley
$
12,000.00
TOTAL
$
11,736,300.00
$
985,025.00
Note: Parcel purchase price only does not include: relocation for property owner, relocation of tenants, closing costs **311 Chihuahua parking and access easement included in purchase of 306 Overland
Owned by City of El Paso 14
Recording our History Union Plaza Historic American Building Surveys Existing Conditions
15
Required Treatments The MPC footprint is within the Union Plaza District (U-P), established by a zoning act – and requires administrative review for alterations and new construction There are no other requirements, for treatment of the MPC footprint buildings, imposed upon the City by any federal state or local regulations 16
Elective Treatment: Building Surveys The Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) was established to create a national archive of architectural heritage HABS work in the MPC is not required by local, state, or federal regulations, but the National Park Service welcomes records for any structures of historic interest as long as the documentation meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Architectural and Engineering Documentation HABS work is required when a property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, in order to mitigate for alterations or demolition 17
Elective Treatment: Building Surveys
18
Historic American Building Surveys Eight structures within the footprint are being surveyed for inclusion in the National Park Service’s HABS Archives:
212 and 306 Overland 300 and 305 Chihuahua 309 Chihuahua 315 Chihuahua 325 Chihuahua 215 Paisano
19
Historic American Building Surveys
20
Historic American Building Surveys
21
Historic American Building Surveys
Property Conditions 306 Overland “The Mansion�
Of 22 parcels in the MPC footprint, 18 are structures, most of these in demolition-byneglect after decades of vacancy and deferred maintenance.
Property Conditions 306 Overland “The Mansion”
Property Conditions 325 Santa Fe
Property Conditions 212 Overland “The Chinese Laundry”
Properties within the MPC Footprint 49% of the total footprint area is composed of open lots or parking surface
Proposed Entertainment District
28
Next Steps Archaeology Work
29
Archeology Secure the site with Permanent Fencing and Cameras Moore to conduct field investigations under Permit 8525 received 10-15-18 Phase I – Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Phase II – Mechanical Survey (excavation) of Footprint area
30
Phase 1: GPR Field Investigations will occur where the pavement surface is available initially and will be repeated as new areas are made accessible. This will continue until all areas that will be impacted by the MPC have been examined Interim Report Develop excavation locations
31
Phase 2: Mechanical - Excavation GPR Results will dictate Mechanical Survey Exploratory trenches Area excavations to identify features Map and assess features for research potential Manual Excavation Limited to those features determined significant Artifacts found will collected, cleaned, restored, modeled electronically in 3-d, made available for researchers, public and interested parties Preservation is achieved by displaying these artifacts in local museums or even within the gallery of the new MPC and through interpretive signage 32
Motion December 6, 2016: Following motion was taken regarding the MPC design: Motion made by Representative Svarzbein, seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Noe, and carried to DIRECT City staff to add urban design and historical preservation design elements into procurement review criteria for firm selection and design; after firm is selected, direct firm to incorporate new urban design as defined by residential, commercial, and small and ground floor retail uses and historical features and to DIRECT the City Manager to incorporate new urban design and historic preservation features in the ongoing design and procurement qualifications for the 2012 Signature ProjectMultipurpose Arena 33
Overlay
Pinnacle Bank Arena Lincoln, NE Opened August 2013
34
Summary I. Deliver the wishes of the Voters I. Archaeology II. Work with legal to establish a timeline for the Solicitations III. Time is of the Essence
35
Thank you 36