Guidelines Update eBook by Physician's Weekly

A collection of articles based on recently released guidelines and recommendations.

News By Topic:

Guidelines Update

Read some of our coverage on new guidelines and recommendations online or download this eBook today! visit www.physweekly.com/guidelines

eBook Instructions The Basics Use these arrows to navigate backward and forward through the eBook. Email this link to a friend.

Move the mouse over the left or right edge of the eBook image to turn the page. A gray bar will appear with an arrow indicating the direction you will flip.

Type in a page number to navigate directly to that page. Print options: left page, right page, or current page spread. Download a PDF of this eBook.

You can also click on the thumbnail pages at the bottom to nagivate directly to a specific page.

‘Read View’ Options Clicking anywhere on the page will take you to the ‘Read View,’ and the menu items to the left will appear. Simply moving the mouse will change the area of the page that is legible. At any time you can hit the ESC key to return you to the page flip view.

From left to right: (-) to (+) slider bar adjusts the zoom level. The eye icon changes the viewing mode. The envelope icon enables the ‘share’ email function. And the (x) icon returns you to the page flip view. Use the left and right arrows to navigate through the eBrochure in the ‘Read View.’

Other Options Enter Fullscreen mode. Hit the ESC key to return to the normal view of your browser window. Additional viewing options. “Magazine View” recommended. Index. Click to view a thumbnail version of the eBook.

Link to HTML code to embed this eBook on your site.

View more information about this particular eBook, as well as company information. Search for a specific word or term. Use either of these icons to let us know what you think about this publication.

Table of Contents 14

Getting a Grip on Asthma Control, Severity, & Exacerbations — Paul Enright, MD

New Treatment Guidelines for ED — Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, FACP

110 Guidelines for Use of Antiretroviral Therapies — Paul E. Sax, MD

114 Strategies to Improve Medication Adherence — Walid F. Gellad, MD

118 Helpful Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare — Maryanne McGuckin, ScEd, MT

122 N ew Recommendations Managing Depression During Pregnancy — Kimberly A. Yonkers, MD

A Message From the Editor We at Physician’s Weekly are excited to present you with an eBook dedicated to coverage of recently released guidelines, position statements, and recommendations from various distinguished and reputable healthcare organizations nationwide. In recent months, our publication has featured a variety of these types of news items, focusing on clinical and evidence-based research. The content in these articles relies on the expertise of our contributing physician authors. We anticipate that Physician’s Weekly will continue to feature news in this field of medicine in the coming months. We hope that you find this information useful in your practice. Please let us know your thoughts by contacting us at editor@physweekly.com. Sincerely,

Keith D’Oria Managing Editor, Physician’s Weekly

Management:

Sales:

Editorial:

Senior Vice President Clay Romweber

Business Development Managers Dave Dempsey Elaine Musco Dennis Turner Luke Williams

Managing Editor Keith M. D’Oria

Production Manager George Camba

Vice President Denise Halverson

Project Administrator Lauri Hutchinson

Senior Editor Janine E. Anthes

Administrative Assistant Erika Kaufman

Institutional Relations Amy Johnson Michelle McKenna Sadie Steib Judy Wengryn

Mngr Hospital Relations Jacquie Jacovino

Senior Director of Marketing Tom Richards

Art Director Jonathan M. Nichol Associate Art Director Timothy B. Hodges

Customer Service:

Director of Operations Derek Mirdala Interactive Marketing Specialist Sally Ladd

Physician’s Weekly™ (ISSN 1047-3793) is published by Physician’s Weekly, LLC, a News Partner of Pri-Med, and a division of M/C Holding Corp. The service is free for qualifying institutions. Please contact us at editor@physweekly.com for more information. Offices: Physician’s Weekly, LLC, 490 State Route 33, Millstone Township, NJ 08535; and 180 Mount Airy Rd, Suite 102, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920. Reproduction without written permission from the publisher is prohibited. Copyright 2010, Physician’s Weekly, LLC.

Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in Physician’s Weekly should not be construed as an endorsement of the product or the manufacturer’s claims. The appearance of or reference to any person or entity in this publication (including images) does not constitute an expressed or implied endorsement of the product mentioned. The reader is advised to consult appropriate medical literature and the product information currently provided by the manufacturer of each drug to verify indications, dosage, method, duration of administration, and contraindications.

visit www.physweekly.com

April 26, 2010 â&#x20AC;˘ Issue No. 16 Click here to view this article online.

Paul Enright, MD Research Professor of Medicine The University of Arizona

Getting a Grip on

Asthma Control, Severity, & Exacerbations The American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society recently released recommendations to help standardize the measure ment of improved asthma outcomes after changes in therapy.

working group of experts from the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) recently published recommendations for the standardized definition and data collection for assessing asthma severity, asthma control, and asthma exacerbations in clinical trials and clinical practice (www.thoracic.org). “The FDA has traditionally required that increases in lung function (FEV1) be the primary outcome in clinical trials of new asthma therapy, but clinicians realize that the primary goals of patients are to minimize symptoms and prevent asthma attacks or exacerbations,” says Paul Enright, MD, a member of the working group. “Improved lung function is an easily available objective measure of pre-therapy asthma severity and the best test of bronchodilator therapy, but good, longterm asthma control on therapy is an even more important patient-oriented outcome.”

Asthma Exacerbations According to Dr. Enright, emergency room visits for asthma indicate a failure of the healthcare system to help patients control their asthma. Asthma exacerbations occur across the spectrum of asthma severity, risk death, and cause considerable anxiety to patients and their families. They are also expensive and associated with significant loss of school days or work. Only in the past decade, however, have exacerbations been used as a primary outcome variable in research into the efficacy of drug treatment in asthma. Exacerbations should prompt changes in treatment, according to the ATS/ERS guidelines. Episodes vary considerably in speed of onset and in time to resolution, ranging from a few minutes to several weeks. They also vary in their absolute severity, both between and within individual patients. Clinical charvisit www.physweekly.com

Improved lung function is an easily available objective measure of pre-therapy asthma severity and the best test of bronchodilator therapy, but good, long-term asthma control on therapy is an even more important patient-oriented outcome. —Paul Enright, MD acteristics that cause acute distress and impairment in one patient may represent another patient’s usual status. As such, the guidelines recommend that exacerbation frequency be determined as part of routine asthma assessments (Table 1). Information about the onset and course of previous exacerbations should be used to refine and customize written asthma action plans for each patient.

Asthma Control “Asthma comprises four domains,” says Dr. Enright, “including symptoms, variable airway obstruction, twitchy airways (airway hyperresponsiveness, or AHR), and airway inflammation.” The ATS/ERS guidelines note that asthma severity should be determined before treatment is started, while asthma con-

Table 1

Managing Exacerbations

• The severity of exacerbations varies considerably from patient to patient and over time. • Asthma exacerbations should be identified by worsening symptoms, the need for rescue inhalers, or reduced lung function (FEV1 or peak expiratory flow). • I nformation about the probable cause and the subsequent course of exacerbations should be used to refine and customize the “action points’’ in written asthma action plans. • E xacerbation frequency should be evaluated as part of routine asthma assessment. • A standardized definition of asthma exacerbations is needed for clinical practice, but is not yet available. - I t will differ from the definition used for clinical trials. Source: Adapted from: Paul Enright, MD; and Reddel HK, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:59-99.

trol is the extent to which the various manifestations of the disease are reduced or removed by treatment. Although severe exacerbations are more common in patients with poorly-controlled asthma, they may also occur in patients with mild asthma. For example, an influenza infection often overwhelms the otherwise good control achieved by use of combination asthma inhalers. The FDA warns that although bronchodilators may control symptoms and lung function in the short term, use of long-acting bronchodilators without the concurrent use of an inhaled corticosteroid is dangerous because bronchodilators do not reduce airway inflammation or AHR. Considering these facts, the concept of asthma control should encompass patients’ recent clinical state as well as their future risk for experiencing adverse outcomes.

Asthma Daily Diaries Since asthma symptoms vary widely from week to week, questionnaires administered only at clinic visits are limited by patient recall and often do not capture the overall morbidity experienced by patients. Therefore, the ATS/ERS guidelines recommend patient diaries to measure symptoms, the use of albuterol rescue inhalers, and peak flow or FEV1 for all asthma clinical trials. Dr. Enright says “asthma diaries are very helpful to confirm improved asthma control when medications have been changed, but they are no longer considered a practical tool for helping make the initial diagnosis of asthma.”

Lung Function & Airway Responsiveness According to the ATS/ERS guidelines, it is essential to perform good quality spirometry tests before and after patients inhale albuterol when making a diag-

nosis of asthma and estimating its severity. When the FEV1 is low during clinic visits, it should be measured during follow-up visits to verify that lung function has improved as a result of therapeutic interventions. However, normal lung function does not exclude an asthma diagnosis because patients with mild, intermittent asthma usually have normal spirometry results between exacerbations. Biomarkers of airway inflammation, such as exhaled nitric oxide and inhalation challenge tests (to measure AHR) are safe and becoming more widely available in clinical settings. They should be considered when the differential diagnosis of asthma is difficult. They also provide objective measurements for asthma clinical trials.

Healthcare Utilization When asthma is poorly controlled, patients often require unscheduled use of healthcare, lose work and school productivity, and need more expensive medications. These consequences have significant implications for asthma sufferers and healthcare providers. Measures of healthcare utilization and health-related quality of life provide indirect measures of asthma

Indirect Measures of Asthma Control

Table 2

• Indicate whether primary care consultations were scheduled or unscheduled. • Record all hospital referrals and the outcome. - Patients should be prompted to follow-up with their primary care providers. • The need for prednisone for asthma exacerbations should be recorded. • Record medical certificates issued for absence from work due to asthma. • Clinicians should endeavor to evaluate quality-oflife issues relating to asthma from the perspective of the patient. • Quality-of-life assessments may help uncover unmet needs of patients. Source: Adapted from: Paul Enright, MD; and Reddel HK, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:59-99.

control (Table 2). Dr. Enright notes that “clinicians should also consider these patient-oriented factors when treating patients with asthma.”

Paul Enright, MD, has reported to Physician’s Weekly that he has worked as a consultant for Pfizer on spirometry quality for a smoking cessation study and Gilead for a study of interstitial lung disease. His comments to Physician’s Weekly are his own beliefs and he is not speaking on behalf of the ATS, the ERS, or any other organization.

References Reddel HK, Taylor DR, Bateman ED, et al for the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Task Force on Asthma Control and Exacerbations. Asthma control and exacerbations: standardizing endpoints for clinical asthma trials and clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:59-99. Available at: www.thoracic.org/statements/resources/respiratory-disease-adults/ats-ers-asthma-control-andexacerbations.pdf Bateman ED, Boushey HA, Bousquet J, et al. Can guideline-defined asthma control be achieved? The Gaining Optimal Asthma ControL study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:836-844. Taylor DR, Bateman ED, Boulet LP, et al. A new perspective on concepts of asthma severity and control. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:545-554. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. 2007. Available from: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.htm Lane S, Molina J, Plusa T. An international observational prospective study to determine the cost of asthma exacerbations (COAX). Respir Med. 2006;100:434-450.

visit www.physweekly.com

April 5, 2010 â&#x20AC;˘ Issue No. 13 Click here to view this article online.

New Treatment Guidelines for ED Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, FACP Senior Medical Associate Clinical Programs and Quality of Care Department American College of Physicians

rectile dysfunction (ED) is a common disorder of male sexual function that affects all age groups, especially older people and those with diabetes, vascular diseases, psychiatric disorders, and possibly hypogonadism. The general population continues to age and life expectancy is expected to increase. When combined with the high prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, the healthcare burden and quality-of-life issues associated with ED may be substantial. Current pharmacologic therapies for ED include phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors and hormonal treatment. On November 3, 2009, the American College of Physicians (ACP) published a guideline in the Annals of Internal Medicine based on systematic reviews and current evidence, which presents recommendations on hormonal testing and pharmacologic management for ED.

Initiating & Selecting Therapy The ACP strongly recommends that therapy with a PDE-5 inhibitor be initiated in men who seek treat8

ment for ED and who do not have a contraindication for using these drugs (Table). Oral PDE-5 inhibitors have demonstrated statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in sexual intercourse and erectile function. Overall, PDE-5 inhibitors were well tolerated and were associated with mild or moderate adverse events. The incidence of adverse events did not significantly differ among the available PDE-5 inhibitors. Nitrate therapy, however, is a contraindication for therapy with oral PDE-5 inhibitors. The ACP also recommends that clinicians base their choices of a specific PDE-5 inhibitor on the individual preferences of men with ED. Evidence is insufficient to compare efficacy and adverse effects of different PDE-5 inhibitors, so clinicians should consider individual preferences such as ease of use, cost of medication, and adverse effects profiles.

Some Questions Remain The ACP does not recommend for or against the routine use of hormonal blood tests or hormonal treatment when managing ED because there is inconclusive evidence to determine the net benefits and harms. In studies of men with ED, the prevalence of low testos-

terone varies widely, ranging from 12.5% to 36.0%. The evidence is inconclusive about the effectiveness of hormonal treatment, even in patients with low testosterone. Trials comparing testosterone (delivered in various forms) with placebo in hypogonadal men with ED were small, had low quality, or reported inconsistent effects on erectile function. Considering these lingering questions, clinicians should individualize decisions to measure hormone levels. When deciding whether or not to measure hormone levels, consider the presence or absence of clinical symptoms of hormonal dysfunction (eg, decreased libido, premature ejaculation, or fatigue) and of physical findings (eg, testicular or muscle atrophy). In addition to researching more deeply into hormonal tests and treatments, it’s also paramount that future research endeavors improve upon the quality of reporting. Some studies have evaluated the dose-

Table

Recommendations

The American College of Physicians (ACP) recommends that clinicians initiate therapy with a PDE-5 inhibitor in men who seek treatment for erectile dysfunction and who do not have a contraindication to PDE-5 inhibitor use. The ACP recommends that clinicians base the choice of a specific PDE-5 inhibitor on the individual preferences of men with erectile dysfunction, including ease of use, cost of medication, and adverse effects profile. The ACP does not recommend for or against routine use of hormonal blood tests or hormonal treatment in the management of patients with erectile dysfunction. Source: Adapted from: Qaseem A, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2009;639-649.

response effect of PDE-5 inhibitors with respect to efficacy and harms, but more high-quality studies would be beneficial.

Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, FACP, has indicated to Physician’s Weekly that he is a principal investigator on unrestricted educational grants awarded to the American College of Physicians from the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Atlantic Philanthropies, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Wellpojnt, Inc.

References Qaseem A, Snow V, Denberg TD, et al; for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians. Hormonal testing and pharmacologic treatment of erectile dysfunction: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 20;151 [Epub ahead of print]. Available at: www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/0000605-200911030-00151v1 Tsertsvadze A, Yazdi F, Fink HA, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction. AHRQ Evidence Report/Technology Assessment no. 171. Bethesda, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; May 2009. AHRQ publication no. 08(09)-E016. Available at www.ahrq.gov/downloads/ pub/evidence/pdf/erectiledys/erecdys.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2009. Tsertsvadze A, Fink HA, Yazdi F, MacDonald R, Bella AJ, Ansari MT, et al. Oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and hormonal treatments for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis prepared for an American College of Physicians’ clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:650-661. Wessells H, Joyce GF, Wise M, Wilt TJ. Erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2007;177:1675-1681. Acar D, Cayan S, Bozlu M, Akbay E. Is routine hormonal measurement necessary in initial evaluation of men with erectile dysfunction? Arch Androl. 2004;50:247-253. Earle CM, Stuckey BG. Biochemical screening in the assessment of erectile dysfunction: what tests decide future therapy? Urology. 2003;62:727-731.

visit www.physweekly.com

March 22, 2010 • Issue No. 12 Click here to view this article online.

Paul E. Sax, MD Clinical Director, HIV Program Division of Infectious Diseases Brigham and Women’s Hospital Associate Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School

Guidelines for Use of

Antiretroviral Therapies

Revised guidelines have been issued for the use of antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV. Important changes have been made in the initiation of therapy and determining which regimens are most appropriate when starting treatment.

he Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents issued new guidelines December 1, 2009 for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. The revised recommendations update the November 3, 2008 version of the guidelines. “The guidelines serve as a living document and are updated regularly using electronic distribution channels,” says Paul E. Sax, MD, who is on the DHHS panel. In the guidelines, recommendations are based on the best evidence from prospective trials in HIV therapy with defined endpoints.

When to Start There are several key changes from the November 3, 2008 DHHS guidelines, and one of the most important, in Dr. Sax’s opinion, addresses when to start antiretroviral therapy (ART). “In recent cohort studies, findings support that starting therapy in patients with a higher CD4 cell count is associated with improved outcomes,” he says. “Most of the available evidence recommends starting ART earlier, with specific consider-

ations [Table 1]. For example, one study suggested that treatment be started before the CD4 cell count falls below 350 cells/mm3 while another found that 500 cells/mm3 should be the threshold. Considering data from observational studies and data from prospective clinical trials, the panel decided that the threshold for starting ART should be increased to between 350 cells/mm3 and 500 cells/mm3.” While there is clearly a movement in the updated DHHS guidelines to begin treatment earlier, Dr. Sax says this strategy does not apply to everyone. “Some patients are clearly not ready to start therapy because they can’t commit to lifelong medication adherence. Providers and patients must work together to develop individualized treatment plans, especially in cases where patients have higher CD4 cell counts but are not initiating ART.” The DHHS update continues to recommend that ART be started in all patients who have a history of an AIDS-defining illness or in whom CD4 counts are less than 350 cells/mm3. Regardless of CD4 count, ART should also be started in women who are pregvisit www.physweekly.com

nant or in those who have HIV-associated nephropathy or hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection for which treatment of HBV is indicated.

What to Start The December 1, 2009 DHHS guidelines also provide an update on what specific drug regimens should be started in patients with HIV (Table 2). “There have been many prospective comparative trials of regimens—not just components of regimens—and the panel now offers recommendations for ‘preferred’

Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy Table 1

Earlier initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is recommended with the following specific considerations:

“The reason preferred regimens were chosen is that direct head-to-head, randomized clinical trials have been published,” says Dr. Sax. “These trials offer the highest level of evidence that exists in clinical research. When selecting preferred regimens, clinicians need to

What to Start in ART-Naïve Patients

Table 2

Regimens now have new classifications:

• ART should be initiated in all patients with a history of an AIDS-defining illness or with CD4 count <350 cells/mm3.

• “Preferred.”

• ART should be initiated, regardless of CD4 count, in patients with the following conditions:

• “Acceptable.”

• “Alternative.”

- Pregnancy.

• “Regimens that may be acceptable but more definitive data are needed.”

- H IV-associated nephropathy.

• “Regimens to be used with caution.”

- H epatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection when treatment of HBV is indicated. • ART is recommended for patients with CD4 counts between 350 cells/mm3 and 500 cells/mm3. The Panel was divided on the strength of this recom mendation: 55% wanted a strong recommendation and 45% wanted a moderate recommendation. • F or patients with CD4 counts >500 cells/mm3, 50% of Panel members favored starting ART; the other half viewed treatment as optional in this setting. • P atients initiating ART should be willing and able to commit to lifelong treatment and should understand the benefits and risks of therapy and the importance of adherence. Patients may choose to postpone therapy, and providers, on a case-by-case basis, may elect to defer therapy based on clinical and/or psychosocial factors. Included in the guidelines is a statement of benefits of reduction in HIV-associated inflammation and its associated complications and reduction in HIV transmission and a recognition of risks of short- or long-term drug-related complications, non-adherence to lifelong therapy in asymptomatic patients, and potential for development of drug resistance may offset possible benefits of earlier initiation. Source: Adapted from: Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. December 1, 2009;1-161. Available at www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf.

regimens,” explains Dr. Sax. “Preferred regimens were defined as having the most effective virologic efficacy and tolerability and being the easiest for patients to use.” The guidelines also have “alternative” regimens, which have shown good virologic efficacy and tolerability but have some disadvantages when compared with preferred regimens.

The following changes were made in the recommendations: • “Raltegravir + tenofovir/emtricitabine” has been added as a “Preferred” regimen based on the results of a Phase III randomized controlled trial. • Fosamprenavir/ritonavir is now “Alternate.” Four regimens are now listed as “Preferred” regimens for treatment-naïve patients: • Efavirenz/tenofovir/emtricitabine. • Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir + tenofovir/emtricitabine. • Ritonavir-boosted darunavir + tenofovir/emtricitabine. • Raltegravir + tenofovir/emtricitabine. Lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens are now listed as “Alternative” regimens instead of “Preferred” regimens, except in pregnant women • For pregnant women, twice-daily lopinavir/ ritonavir + zidovudine/lamivudine remains a “Preferred” regimen. Source: Adapted from: Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. December 1, 2009;1-161. Available at www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf.

consider pill burden, adverse event profiles, effects on pregnancy, and other complications of treatment. It’s also important to analyze long-term data when selecting regimens to ensure that HIV patients are directed to the most appropriate ART depending on each person’s individual characteristics. Clinicians should recognize that some patients will be better treated using alternative regimens based on their preexisting conditions. The guidelines can help steer these treatment decisions for providers.”

Other Updates The updated DHHS guidelines added a new section that reviews current knowledge on the epidemiology and diagnosis of HIV-2 infection, and the role of ART in the treatment of these patients. “HIV-2 infection is most prevalent in Western Africa,” says Dr. Sax. “There also appears to be a higher rate in countries with strong socioeconomic ties to West Africa, such as France, Spain, Portugal, and former Portuguese colonies such as Brazil, Angola, Mozambique and parts of India, near Goa. This can affect U.S. clinicians too because immigrants from these regions may enter the

country. Unfortunately, we still lack data on the optimal treatment of HIV-2 infection. The limited available evidence indicates that non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors do not appear to have activity in these patients. For now, a regimen containing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus a boosted protease inhibitor is probably the best approach.” More specific recommendations are provided con cerning when genotypic and phenotypic testing should be used to guide management in both newly-diagnosed patients and in treatment-experienced patients when viremia develops during treatment. The guidelines have updated information on drugresistance testing, regimens that should not be used, the management of treatment-experienced patients, treatment simplification, and hepatitis C coinfection. Sections on antiretroviral-associated adverse effects, antiretroviral drug interactions, and the prevention of secondary transmission of HIV have also been updated. Dr. Sax says “these guidelines can provide helpful advice for clinicians managing patients with HIV and will continue to be updated as more evidence emerges in the future.”

Paul E. Sax, MD, has disclosed to Physician’s Weekly that he has served as an advisor or consultant to, and has received grants for educational activities from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Tibotec, and Pfizer. He has also received grants for clinical research and educational activities and served as an advisor or consultant to Merck and GlaxoSmithKline.

References Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. December 1, 2009;1-161. Available at www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/Adultand AdolescentGL.pdf Matheron S, Pueyo S, Damond F, et al. Factors associated with clinical progression in HIV-2 infected-patients: the French ANRS cohort. AIDS. 2003;17:2593-2601. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-14):1-17. Stone VE, Jordan J, Tolson J, et al. Perspectives on adherence and simplicity for HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy: self-report of the relative importance of multiple attributes of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in predicting adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;36:808-816. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service Task Force recommendations for use of antiretroviral drugs in pregnant HIV-1-infected women for maternal health and interventions to reduce perinatal HIV-1 transmission in the United States. Available at: aidsinfo. nih.gov/contentfiles/PerinatalGL.pdf Gulick RM, Ribaudo HJ, Shikuma CM, et al. Three- vs four-drug antiretroviral regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;296:769-781 Kitahata MM, Gange SJ, Abraham AG, et al; NA-ACCORD Investigators. Effect of early versus deferred antiretroviral therapy for HIV on survival. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1815-1826.

visit www.physweekly.com

February 15, 2010 â&#x20AC;˘ Issue No. 7 Click here to view this article online.

Contributing to this article:

Walid F. Gellad, MD

Associate Scientist and Policy Researcher RAND Corporation Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of General Medicine University of Pittsburgh Staff Physician VA Pittsburgh Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion

Strategies to Improve

Medication Adherence A diverse group of healthcare and consumer organizations have released recommendations to promote better adherence to medication use and improve health outcomes for patients.

ccording to recent estimates, about a third to a half of all patients in the United States fail to comply with their prescribed pharmacotherapy regimens. Failure to adhere to medications can reduce quality of care and increase medical expenses. Costs attributable to non-adherence are about $290 billion each year, and much of this spending stems from complications that result from not taking medications appropriately. “Patients fail to take their medications for many reasons, including difficulty with dosing regimens, costs, side effects, or concerns about drugs in general,” says Walid F. Gellad, MD. “Providers need different strategies and interventions to improve adherence.” To achieve optimal medication adherence, considerations must be made with regard to effective patientprovider communication, coordination among care providers, and active engagement and participation by patients. “All too often, patients are lacking important information or there are gaps in their com-

munication with providers,” Dr. Gellad says. “For these reasons, it’s critical to identify any opportunities to remove barriers that keep patients from adhering to their medications.”

New Policy Recommendations On July 15, 2009, several organizations convened more than 40 experts to discuss poor medication adherence in the United States, including Glaxo SmithKline, the National Association of Chain Drug Stores Foundation, the National Consumers League, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and the American College of Cardiology. As a result of this meeting, consensus policy recommendations to reduce barriers to adherence were released on October 14, 2009. Using themes that emerged from the July 15, 2009 conference and considering the proposed policies under review by Congress, the resulting recommendations focus on the following key areas: quality improvement stratvisit www.physweekly.com

egies, care coordination, use of health information technology (IT), and patient and provider education and engagement (Table 1).

must also improve, and physicians should recognize the importance of medications in settings where care is coordinated for multiple providers and patients.

Quality Improvement & Coordination of Care

Technology to the Rescue

Despite the U.S. having an advanced healthcare system, further improvements in quality can and must be achieved. “Given the role that medications play in treating diseases—particularly chronic ones—we must implement strategies to recognize medication adherence and appropriate drug use as critical components of improving outcomes and quality,” explains Dr. Gellad. He adds that care coordination Table 1

Congress invested over $19 billion in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to help accelerate the development of a nationwide interoperable health IT infrastructure. Policies have been initiated to encourage physicians to use electronic prescribing. Other policy makers are considering different strategies that build upon these reforms and utilize health IT to improve patient care and measure adherence. This information may ultimately help to

Key Recommendations

Coordinate Care:

Quality Improvement:

• D evelop specified criteria for qualification as a medical home, including care teams consisting of a broad range of providers involved in patient care (eg, pharmacists) and active involvement of patients and caregivers in developing and implementing care plans. • Establish care plans for use in a range of care coordination models that include initial medication review of all prescription and OTC medications and supplements.

• Create validated consensus-based metrics and public reporting tools to help establish a baseline and to set goals. • Establish suitable provider incentives. • Utilize prevention initiatives. Patient/Provider Education and Engagement: • Support public education campaigns regarding compliance with chronic disease management.

- U se information from reviews to establish and reach clinical goals.

• Use electronic and telephonic reminders, packaging features, and other tools.

- A dopt medication reconciliation processes across healthcare providers during transitions in care.

• Utilize case management and other services designed to help patients take their medications correctly.

• Use suitable incentives to support care coordination activities; deliver to pharmacists, physicians, and other providers.

• Give provider education and training on shared decision-making and other patient communication techniques. • Promote health plan and payor strategies to design benefits that:

Health IT: • Develop EHR standards that support consistent data collection, ease of use, and provider access to comprehensive electronic medication use information for patients.

- Encourage better access to recommended treatments.

• Create incentives for providers to use health IT to identify patients at risk for poor medication adherence.

- Foster coordination of existing community-based services.

• Enable for patient-provider and provider-provider sharing of EHRs while ensuring patient privacy.

- Promote providers use of screening tools to identify patients at risk for poor medication adherence.

• Use electronic reminders and personal health records; optimize use by consumers.

- Increase patient awareness of tools to improve adherence.

- Disseminate best practices and interventions.

Abbreviations: OTC, over-the-counter; IT, information technology; EHR, electronic health record.

Source: Adapted from: Prescription for Healthier Patients: Real Solutions for Better Medication Adherence. Better Medication Adherence is Essential to Improve Health Care Quality, Outcomes and Value. Diverse Group of Key Stakeholders Develop Consensus Policy Recommendations. October 14, 2009. Available at www.nacds.org/user-assets/pdfs/2009/pharmacy/Policy_Recommendations_091014.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2009.

improve healthcare quality. “The potential for health IT is enormous,” says Dr. Gellad. “It can be used to improve the flow of medication use information between patients and providers at the point of care and during transitions of care. Importantly, health IT can assist in identifying and addressing gaps about patients’ medication use.”

Priority Areas for Future Research

Table 2

Additional research on medication adherence is needed. This should include: • Carefully designed studies of a wide range of interventions to improve medication adherence. • Assessments of:

Educating & Engaging Providers & Patients Patients’ beliefs and expectations about their medi cations and the availability of social supports can affect patients’ ability to adhere to treatment regimens. Good patient-provider communication is also necessary. “Physicians need to encourage patientcentered care that is designed to help patients better understand their conditions and recommended treatments, including medications,” says Dr. Gellad. “Providers need to establish clear lines of communication about medication adherence with their patients at every encounter. Efforts should support providers in effectively communicating the importance of following treatment plans to patients and their caregivers.” Education, counseling, reconciliation, and other activities that fully engage patients may further improve adherence.

More to Come Although much is known about the impact of poor medication adherence, more research is necessary to achieve better medication use and improve clinical outcomes (Table 2). “We have a good understanding of the barriers that patients face in taking their

- The relationship between non-health related factors (eg, language, literacy, economic status) and medication adherence. - Less studied aspects of medication adherence (eg, factors that lead to failure to first fill a prescription). • The impact of setting and type of provider on effectiveness of alternative interventions in addressing patient barriers and barriers faced by different patient groups. • Collection of additional information on patient medication use. • Continued evaluation of the economic and clinical impact of improved medication adherence on healthcare system costs and health status. Source: Adapted from: Prescription for Healthier Patients: Real Solutions for Better Medication Adherence. Better Medication Adherence is Essential to Improve Health Care Quality, Outcomes and Value. Diverse Group of Key Stakeholders Develop Consensus Policy Recommendations. October 14, 2009. Available at www.nacds.org/user-assets/pdfs/2009/pharmacy/Policy_ Recommendations_091014.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2009.

medications appropriately,” says Dr. Gellad, “but we need more research that assesses the effectiveness of interventions to improve adherence. Interventions to reduce barriers to adherence will hopefully help patients and providers achieve better medication use and health outcomes.”

Walid F. Gellad, MD, has indicated to Physician’s Weekly that he has or has had no financial interests to report. He notes that he was a participant in the July 2009 expert panel discussed in the article, but is not an author of the ensuing policy recommendations.

References Prescription for Healthier Patients: Real Solutions for Better Medication Adherence. Better Medication Adherence is Essential to Improve Health Care Quality, Outcomes and Value. Diverse Group of Key Stakeholders Develop Consensus Policy Recommendations. October 14, 2009. Available at www.nacds.org/user-assets/pdfs/2009/pharmacy/Policy_Recommendations_091014.pdf Accessed October 29, 2009. Osterberg L., Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005:353:487-497. Gellad WF, Haas JS, Safran DG. Race/ethnicity and nonadherence to prescription medications among seniors: results of a national study. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1572-1578. Gellad WF, Huskamp HA, Phillips KA, Haas JS. How the new medicare drug benefit could affect vulnerable populations. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25:248-255.

visit www.physweekly.com

February 8, 2010 â&#x20AC;˘ Issue No. 6 Click here to view this article online.

Maryanne McGuckin, ScEd, MT President and Founder McGuckin Methods International, Inc. Senior Scholar, Department of Health Policy Thomas Jefferson University

Helpful Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare The World Health Organization has issued guidelines to improve hand hygiene practices and reduce the transmission of pathogenic microorganisms.

hroughout the world, surveillance and prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) have become a greater priority for institutions committed to making healthcare safer. These infections have been associated with prolonged hospital stays, long-term disability, increased resistance of microorganisms to antimicrobials, massive financial burdens, high costs for patients and their families, and excess deaths. One prominent reason for the spread of HCAIs has been poor hand hygiene. In an effort to address this issue, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued guidelines on hand hygiene in healthcare in May 2009. Available at www.who.int, the guidelines offer a thorough review of evidence as well as specific recommendations to improve hand hygiene practices and reduce transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to patients and healthcare workers (HCWs). “The new WHO guidelines are an extension to recommendations issued by the CDC in 2002,” explains Maryanne McGuckin, ScEd, MT, who was on

the task force that created both the WHO and CDC guidelines. “They provide an extensive literature review and inform clinicians on strategies for improvement that have tested successfully.” The WHO guidelines are designed to be used in any setting in which healthcare is delivered. Individual adaptation of the recommendations is encouraged, based on local regulations, settings, needs, and resources.

Assessing Practices & Adherence According to the WHO guidelines, understanding hand hygiene practices among HCWs is essential to planning interventions. Adherence by HCWs to recommended procedures has been reported with significant variation, reaching unacceptably poor levels in some cases. Risk factors for poor adherence to hand hygiene recommendations have been well-documented, and there appears to be an inverse relationship between intensity of patient care and adherence to hand hygiene.

visit www.physweekly.com

Perceived barriers to hand hygiene adherence recommendations include skin irritation caused by hand hygiene agents, inaccessible hand hygiene supplies, interference with HCW-patient relationships, and the perception that patient needs take priority over hand hygiene. Wearing of gloves, forgetfulness, lack of knowledge of guidelines, insufficient time for hand hygiene, and high workload and understaffing are other perceived barriers. Furthermore, some HCWs have reported believing that they washed their hands when necessary even when observations indicated that they did not.

Enacting Real Change The WHO guidelines provide many important recommendations, spanning the domains of indications for hand hygiene; hand hygiene technique; surgical hand preparation; selection and handling of hand hygiene agents; skin care; use of gloves; and other aspects of hand hygiene. Dr. McGuckin says that most HCWs are aware of practices that correlate with good hand hygiene, but she notes that—despite this fact—rates of adherence are still low. “The key for clinicians is to understand that good hand hygiene practices are encouraged at each and every patient

Table Programs for HCWs: Strive to Educate & Motivate • In hand hygiene promotion programs for healthcare workers (HCWs), focus specifically on factors currently found to have a significant influence on behavior and not solely on the type of hand hygiene products. - Strategies should be multifaceted and multimodal and include education and senior executive support for implementation. • Educate HCWs about the type of patient-care activities that can result in hand contamination. - Provide information about the advantages and disadvantages of various methods used to clean hands. •M onitor HCWs’ adherence to recommended hand hygiene practices. - Provide HCWs with performance feedback. • E ncourage partnerships between patients, their families, and HCWs to promote hand hygiene in healthcare settings. Source: Adapted from: World Health Organization. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597906_eng.pdf.

encounter. Clinicians must understand when and how to use specific techniques. To enact real change, multimodal approaches and complete collaboration among all constituents are imperative. Guidelines must be disseminated, multidisciplinary efforts aimed at improving hand hygiene must be fostered, and explicit administrative support must be gained and maintained.” The guidelines outline several strategies to implement improvement efforts for hand hygiene. “Some strategies include posting hand hygiene policies near the point of care, conducting education and training programs regularly, and ensuring that facilities are equipped properly to encourage good hand hygiene,” says Dr. McGuckin. “A helpful example is the ‘My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene’ tool, which serves as a reminder for clinicians on when to practice hand hygiene [Figure]. This tool and others outlined in the WHO guidelines should be disseminated throughout healthcare settings.”

Empowering Patients & HCWs There has been increasing interest in establishing interventions to promote hand hygiene, including (but not limited to) HCW education, performance feedback, reminders, use of automated sinks, and the introduction of alcohol-based handrubs. Dr. McGuckin says that education of HCWs and patients alike is one of the cornerstones of improvement in hand hygiene practices (Table). “It’s especially critical that patients be empowered to ask their HCWs questions about hand hygiene. Likewise, providers need to be proactive and inform patients that they’re practicing good hand hygiene to protect them. Fostering and encouraging this communication is critical, and the issue must be brought to the forefront.”

Sustaining Efforts Regular hand hygiene monitoring and feedback on adherence by HCWs are imperative to sustaining hand hygiene improvements. “The ultimate goal is to lower the rate of HCAIs,” says Dr. McGuckin. “To do that, the impact of hand hygiene interventions and promotion programs for HCWs must be measured. The clinical focus should be on specific factors that influence behavior. Strategies should be multifaceted and multimodal, and include consistent education and senior executive support.”

Figure

My 5

Before Before touching touching a patient Before a patient Moments touching for Hand a patient Before Before clean/antiseptic touching procedure a patient

After touching patient

Hygiene

Before Before clean/antiseptic procedure clean/antiseptic Before procedure clean/antiseptic procedure

After After touching touching patient patient After touching patient After

Before After body clean/antiseptic fluid exposure procedure risk

After touching patient surroundings touching patient

After After touching patient surroundings touching patient surroundings After touching patient surroundings

Source: Adapted from: World Health Organization. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597906_eng.pdf.

After touching patient After body surroundings fluid exposureAfter body fluid exposure risk After body risk fluid exposure Maryanne McGuckin, ScEd,risk MT, has indicated to Physician’s Weekly that she has no financial disclosures to report. After body fluid exposure risk References

World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care, 2009. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/ 9789241597906_eng.pdf Accessed October 22, 2009. McGuckin Methods International, Inc. Available at: www.hhreports.com Accessed October 28, 2009. Boyce JM. Hand hygiene compliance monitoring: current perspectives from the USA. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70(Suppl 1):2-7. Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Boyce J; World Health Organization World Alliance for Patient Safety First Global Patient Safety Challenge Core Group of Experts. The World Health Organization Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care and their consensus recommendations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:611-622. Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uçkay I, Larson E, Boyce J, Pittet D. ‘My five moments for hand hygiene’: a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect. 2007;67:9-21. Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Sax H, et al; WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge, World Alliance for Patient Safety. Evidence-based model for hand transmission during patient care and the role of improved practices. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:641-652. McGuckin M, Waterman R, Shubin A. Consumer attitudes about healthcare-acquired infections and hand hygiene. Am J Med Qual. 2006;21:342-346. McGuckin M, Waterman R, Govednik J. Hand hygiene compliance in the U.S: a multicenter evaluation using product volume measurement and feedback. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24:205-213.

visit www.physweekly.com

January 11, 2010 â&#x20AC;˘ Issue No. 2 Click here to view this article online.

Kimberly A. Yonkers, MD Professor of Psychiatry Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences Director, PMS & Perinatal Research Program Yale University School of Medicine

New Recommendations Managing Depression

During Pregnancy

New recommendations have been unveiled to help physicians and patients weigh the risks and benefits of various treatment interventions for depression during pregnancy.

t has been estimated that between 14% and 23% of pregnant women will experience depressive symptoms during their pregnancy. An investigation published in 2003 reported that about 13% of women take an antidepressant at some time during their pregnancy. “Depression in pregnant women frequently goes unrecognized and untreated for a host of reasons, including concerns about the safety of some treatments for pregnant patients and their offspring,” says Kimberly A. Yonkers, MD. “There may be risks associated with both untreated depression and the use of antidepressants that can complicate treatment decisions.”

A New Review An evidence-based report from the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has been published to assist clinicians and patients as they weigh the risks and benefits of various treatment op-

tions for depression during pregnancy. The APA and ACOG convened a work group consisting of clinical research experts within the fields of obstetrics and gynecology, psychiatry, and pediatrics, which critically evaluated and summarized information about risks associated with depression and the use of antidepressants during pregnancy. The resulting recommendations were published jointly in the September 2009 issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology and the September/ October 2009 issue of General Hospital Psychiatry. “Typically, OB-GYNs, nurse practitioners, and nurse midwives are the clinicians who most often see women who are pregnant,” says Dr. Yonkers. “They can be the first clinician to make a diagnosis of depression in some cases. Other times, they may be the first to observe depressive symptoms that are worsening. In the past, reproductive health practitioners have reported feeling ill-prepared to treat these patients because of the lack of evidence-based guidance. With the publication of these recommendations, our hope visit www.physweekly.com

Table

An Overview of Recommendations

For Women Considering Pregnancy: • For women on medication with mild or no symptoms for 6 months or longer, it may be appropriate to taper and discontinue medication before becoming pregnant. • Medication discontinuation may not be appropriate in women with: - A history of severe, recurrent depression. - Psychosis.

- B ipolar disorder.

- Other psychiatric illness requiring medication. - A history of suicide attempts. • Women with suicidal or acute psychotic symptoms should be referred to a psychiatrist for aggressive treatment. For Pregnant Women Currently on Depression Medication: • Psychiatrically stable women who prefer to stay on medication may be able to do so after consultation between their psychiatrist and OB-GYN to discuss risks and benefits. • Women who would like to discontinue medication may attempt medication tapering and discontinuation if they are not experiencing symptoms, depending on their psychiatric history. - Women with a history of recurrent depression are at a high risk of relapse if medication is discontinued. • Women with recurrent depression or who have symptoms despite their medication may benefit from psychotherapy to replace or augment medication. • Women with severe depression (with suicide attempts, functional incapacitation, or weight loss) should remain on medication. - If a patient refuses medication, alternative treatment and monitoring should be in place, preferably before discontinuation. For Pregnant Women Not Currently on Depression Medication: • Psychotherapy may be beneficial in women who prefer to avoid antidepressant medication. • For women who prefer taking medication, risks and benefits of treatment choices should be evaluated and discussed, including factors such as: - Stage of gestation.

- Symptoms.

- History of depression. - Other conditions and circumstances (eg, a smoker, difficulty gaining weight).

is that we’ll better inform providers about current research on various depression treatment methods and improve clinicians’ understanding and ability to help with decision making.”

Diagnostic Challenges & Consequences Identifying depression in pregnant women can be difficult because depressive symptoms often mimic usual experiences of pregnancy. “Some symptoms of depression, including changes in mood, energy level, appetite, and cognition, are normative in pregnancy,” explains Dr. Yonkers. “When these symptoms present, clinicians should view them as a cue to ask additional questions. We must also consider the likelihood that patients may be reluctant to admit feelings of depression. There is a belief that women are supposed to be happy when they’re pregnant, so they may be embarrassed to admit that they aren’t. Other women may view their depressed feelings as a character flaw rather than an illness, or they may believe that depression will reflect negatively on their capability of being a good mother.” Research has shown that depressive symptoms and use of antidepressant medications during pregnancy have been associated with negative consequences for newborns. Infants born to women with depression are at greater risk for irritability, less activity and attentiveness, and fewer facial expressions when compared with those born to mothers without depression. Depression during pregnancy is also associated with fetal growth changes and shorter gestation periods. Dr. Yonkers adds that some studies have linked fetal malformations, cardiac defects, pulmonary hypertension, and reduced birth weight to antidepressant use during pregnancy. “Furthermore, depressed women are more likely to have poor prenatal care and pregnancy complications (eg, nausea, vomiting, and preeclampsia) and to use drugs, alcohol, and nicotine,” she says.

For All Pregnant Women: • Regardless of circumstances, a woman with suicidal or psychotic symptoms should immediately see a psychiatrist for treatment. Source: Adapted from: Yonkers KA, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:703-713.

Highlighting Key Recommendations According to the APA/ACOG report, some patients with mild-to-moderate depression can be treated with psychotherapy alone or in combi-

nation with medication. “There is no one-size-fitsall approach for managing depression during pregnancy,” Dr. Yonkers says. “Management approaches should depend on specific scenarios, patient characteristics, and severity of depression. The APA/ ACOG report provides algorithms to help clinicians during their care of these women. It should be noted that there are more ways to intervene than to simply medicate or do nothing. Pregnant women with severe recurrent depression should be considered for some sort of treatment, be it psychological, medical, or both.” One of the key recommendations of the APA/ACOG report is that there needs to be ongoing consultation between OB-GYNs, psychiatrists, and other healthcare providers during pregnancy (Table). “A collaborative approach is paramount,” says Dr. Yonkers. “The more communication there is within this triad of providers, the better. We should seek to form a united front when dealing with a severe depressive disorder in this patient group.” Physicians and providers should remember that women taking antidepressants prior to pregnancy

received these medications for good reason, says Dr. Yonkers. “As providers, we can’t only look at one part of the picture in isolation and simply take all patients off antidepressants. We need to recognize that our treatment strategies and decisions may have profound effects during pregnancy.”

More Data Needed Dr. Yonkers says that there is some existing research relating to antidepressant use in pregnancy, but more data are needed. “We have yet to adequately control for other factors that may influence birth outcomes, including maternal illness or health behaviors that can adversely affect pregnancy,” she says. “Few studies of antidepressants and birth outcomes assessed the mothers’ psychiatric condition. Confounding factors that influence birth outcomes— poor prenatal care and drug, alcohol, and nicotine use—are often not controlled in studies. Our recommendations may be utilized as a guide to foster more in-depth research. In the meantime, our hope is that they are used as a resource when caring for pregnant women who have or are at risk of developing major depressive disorder.”

Kimberly A. Yonkers, MD, has indicated to Physician’s Weekly that in the past year she has received an investigator initiated trial funded by Eli Lilly and has received study medication from Pfizer for an NIMH funded trial.

References Yonkers KA, Wisner KL, Stewart DE, et al. The management of depression during pregnancy: a report from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:703-713. Available at: http://journals.lww.com/ greenjournal/Citation/2009/09000/The_Management_ of_Depression_During_Pregnancy__A.44.aspx Smith MV, Shao L, Howell H, Wang H, Poschman K, Yonkers KA. Success of mental health referral among pregnant and postpartum women with psychiatric distress. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009;31:155-162. Yonkers KA. Parsing risk for the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:268-270. Yonkers KA, Smith MV, Lin H, Howell HB, Shao L, Rosenheck RA. Depression screening of perinatal women: an evaluation of the healthy start depression initiative. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:322-328. Spoozak L, Gotman N, Smith MV, Belanger K, Yonkers KA. Evaluation of a social support measure that may indicate risk of depression during pregnancy. J Affect Disord. 2009;114:216-223. Yonkers KA. The treatment of women suffering from depression who are either pregnant or breastfeeding. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:1457-1459.

visit www.physweekly.com