2014 Capital Markets Review Piper Jaffray Capital Markets
Piper Jaffray & Co., Member NYSE and SIPC
Table of Contents Section I
2014 Year in Review
Section II
IPO Market Review
Section III
Follow-on Offering Market Review
Section IV
Confidentially Marketed Follow-on (URD), Registered Direct & PIPE Market Review
Section V
Convertible Market Review
Appendix A
Piper Jaffray Credentials
1
Section I
2014 Year in Review
2014 Year in Review 2014 Global Index Performance
Prior Decade of Global Index Performance (2004 – 2013) 53%
China (Shanghai)
132%
Brazil (Bovespa)
13%
U.S. (Nasdaq)
154%
Russia (RTS)
30%
India (Sensex)
263%
India (Sensex)
U.S. (Russell 2000)
109%
8%
U.S. (Nasdaq)
108%
Canada (Toronto)
7%
Hong Kong (Hang Seng)
Japan (Nikkei)
7%
11%
U.S. (S&P 500) U.S. (Dow Jones)
4%
U.S. (Russell 2000) Hong Kong (Hang Seng)
1%
Australia (ASX)
1%
Australia (ASX)
61%
U.S. (Dow Jones)
59% 53%
-3%
U.K. (FTSE)
-45%
China (Shanghai)
Brazil (Bovespa) Russia (RTS) -20%
66%
51%
-3%
-40%
U.S. (S&P 500) Canada (Toronto)
Japan (Nikkei)
U.K. (FTSE)
-60%
85% 66%
0%
20%
40%
0%
60%
2014 S&P 500 Subsector Performance
41% 100%
200%
Prior Decade of S&P 500 Subsector Performance (2004 – 2013)
Utilities
Energy
24%
Health Care Info Tech
191%
Cons. Disc
23%
113%
Cons. Staples
18%
98%
Financials
13%
Health Care
84%
Cons. Staples
13%
Info Tech
81%
Industrials
81%
S&P 500
11%
Cons. Disc
0%
63%
Financials
-10% -5%
66%
Utilities
5%
Energy
76%
S&P 500
8%
Materials
-10%
Materials
8%
Industrials
5%
10%
300%
15%
20%
25%
30%
-50%
-22% 0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
Source: Capital IQ Returns stated in each country’s local currency
3
250%
2014 Year in Review U.S. Indices grew 9% on
U.S. Historical Index Performance by Year
average in 2014
50% 37%
40%
Over the last 5 years, major indices are up 89% on average led by the NASDAQ and Russell 2000, which are up 109% and 93%, respectively
Average % Return by Year of Major U.S. Indices
33% 28%
30% 20%
17%
14%
13%
9%
10%
9%
4%
2% 0%
0%
-10% -20%
-10% -15% -23%
-30% -40%
-37%
-50% 2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
(6%)
(7%)
(17%)
25%
3%
(1%)
16%
6%
(34%)
19%
11%
6%
7%
26%
8%
Nasdaq
(39%)
(21%)
(32%)
50%
9%
1%
10%
10%
(41%)
44%
17%
(2%)
16%
38%
13%
S&P 500
(10%)
(13%)
(23%)
26%
9%
3%
14%
4%
(38%)
23%
13%
(0%)
13%
30%
11%
Dow Jones
Russell 2000 Average
2005
(4%)
1%
(22%)
45%
17%
3%
17%
(3%)
(35%)
25%
25%
(5%)
15%
37%
4%
(15%)
(10%)
(23%)
37%
9%
2%
14%
4%
(37%)
28%
17%
(0%)
13%
33%
9%
Source: Capital IQ
4
2014 Year in Review The VIX is a measure of
CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX) since 1990
90
Russian Financial Crisis
9/11 Terrorist Attack
Iraq War
Arthur Andersen / WorldCom Accounting Scandals
2008 Global Financial Crisis
Flash Crash / U.S. & European Debt Concerns
2012
Asian Financial Crisis
First Gulf War
volatility within the S&P 100 500 over the next 30 days
2009
expectations for
80 VIX Averages:
70
2013 – 2014: ~14
60
2010 – 2012: ~22
50
2008 – 2009: ~32 2004 – 2007: ~15
40 30 20 10
Source: Capital IQ & Piper Jaffray ECM
5
2014
2013
2011
2010
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
0
2014 Year in Review Unemployment Rate
Since peaking in Q4 12%
2009, the unemployment rate has continued to 6% for the first time since 2008
Unemployment Rate
improve, falling below
10.0%
10%
9.6% 8.7%
Average = 7.5%
8%
7.8% 7.0%
7.0% 5.7%
6%
4.8%
4% 2% 0%
Consumer Confidence
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14
Consumer Confidence
ISM Manufacturing Index
120
65
100
60
continued its upward swing in 2014 on the heels of a strong 2013
Median = 56 55
80
Median = 65 50
60 45 40 40 20
0
35
Jan '07
Jul
Jan '08
Jul
Jan '09
Jul
Jan '10
Jul
Jan '11
Jul
Jan '12
Jul
Jan '13
Jul
Jan '14
Jul
30
Jan '07
Jul
Jan '08
Jul
Jan '09
Jul
Jan '10
Jul
Jan '11
Jul
Jan '12
Jul
Jan '13
Jul
Source: Thomson Baseline & Bloomberg
6
Jan '14
Jul
2014 Year in Review U.S. quarterly GDP continued its steady growth in 2014, realizing a 3.3% year-over-year growth rate, the highest
U.S. Real GDP YoY Growth 4% 2%
1.9%
3.3%
3.1%
2.7%
2.4%
1.7%
1.6%
2011
2012
0% (0.2%)
annual growth since 2003
-2%
Current forecasts are
-4%
(2.8%)
targeting a slower growth rate in 2015, +2.4%
-6% 2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
2014
2015
S&P 500 YoY Revenue Growth 40%
15%
but year-over-year revenue growth slowed versus 2013
9.0%
7.8% 5.0%
5%
20% 4.3%
4.7% 2.8%
2.0%
1.9%
0%
0% -20% -5% S&P 500 YoY Revenue Growth
-10%
S&P 500 YoY Index Return
-12.7%
-15% 2007
2008
2009
-40%
-60% 2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Source: Capital IQ & Bloomberg Denotes Forecast
7
S&P 500 Return
finished 2014 +11.4%
10%
S&P 500 Revenue Growth
The S&P 500 index
2014 Year in Review 2014 equity fund flows
Equity Fund Flows Since 2006
continued to build on
FY = $210B
$250
record 2013 inflows as investors maintained $200
confidence in the equity
FY = $143B
markets $150
FY = $116B
CY 2014: +$143 billion CY 2013: +$210 billion CY 2012: +$40 billion
($ in Billions)
Fund Flows: $100
FY = $58B
$50
FY = $40B
FY = $24B
FY = $5B
$0
FY = ($6B) -$50
1/4/06
1/4/07
2006
1/4/08
2007
1/4/09
2008
FY =1/4/10 ($3B) 2009
1/4/11
2010
1/4/12
2011
1/4/13
2012
1/4/14
2013
2014
Source: Thomson Reuters – Lipper U.S. Fund Flows
8
Section II
IPO Market Review
IPO Market Review There have been three
Historical Volume
up-cycles in the IPO
IPO Activity by Year Since 1995
market since 1995
600 531
1995-2000 Mean = 398
500
The 262 IPOs done in than the number priced
# of IPOs
2014 were 25% greater
400
453
409
372
372 2004-2007 Mean = 209
300
252
194
200
in 2013
262
233
80
100
70
197
213
2010-2013 Mean = 155
76 30
153
125
130
2010
2011
2012
210
58
0 1995
2014 saw the most IPO $100
56% increase from 2013
$90
Capital Raised ($B)
year with $93B priced, a
Alibaba IPO, the $68.4B
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2013
2014
IPO Capital Raised Year Since 1995
capital ever raised in a
Excluding the $25B
1996
$93.4
$80 $70 $60
$69.4
$30
raised would have been
$20
the most since 2000
$10
2004-2007 Mean = $47.8B
1995-2000 Mean = $50.4B $46.9 $34.6
$42.6
$37.8
$39.0
$59.9
$53.1
$51.5
$50 $40
$70.9
2010-2013 Mean = $46.7B $43.7 $40.7 $42.6
$46.4 $40.2
$24.8
$26.8 $17.7
$19.5
$0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs
10
IPO Market Review Pricing and aftermarket
Performance by Sector
performance were each
2014 IPO Activity Number 2 4 16 25 27 105 14 2 2 7 51 7 262
Capital Raised ($B) $1.1 $1.1 $3.3 $13.1 $15.4 $10.7 $3.4 $0.7 $0.2 $3.7 $39.3 $1.5 $93.4
% Chg Price File to Offer -6% -4% -2% 1% -7% -12% -16% -11% -8% -4% 2% -12% -7%
% Chg Offer / 1-Day 9% 16% 22% 11% 4% 15% 5% -1% 6% 0% 23% 7% 14%
% Chg Offer / 30-Day 24% 6% 34% 19% 6% 21% 11% 5% -3% 1% 19% 9% 18%
% Chg Offer / YE'14 38% 21% 39% -7% 12% 37% 10% 9% -9% -1% 23% -3% 23%
Number 4 3 16 25 28 54 13 2 3 14 43 5 210
Capital Raised ($B) $1.0 $0.2 $8.9 $12.4 $6.8 $10.2 $4.2 $0.6 $0.4 $4.9 $9.0 $1.2 $59.9
% Chg Price File to Offer -11% -20% 9% 0% -1% -9% -6% 2% -14% -5% 6% -4% -2%
% Chg Offer / 1-Day 13% 9% 44% 6% 6% 22% 7% -2% 12% 3% 32% 4% 18%
% Chg Offer / 30-Day 10% 3% 49% 10% 8% 33% 14% -15% 15% 4% 46% 13% 27%
% Chg Offer / YE'13 24% 16% 54% 30% 28% 51% 25% 3% 32% 7% 65% 25% 41%
softer in 2014 in comparison to 2013
On average, 2014 IPOs priced below the midpoint of the range, but traded up 23%
Sector Business Services Clean Technology Consumer Energy & Mining Financial Health Care Industrials Media Real Estate REIT Technology Transportation Total
2013 IPO Activity Sector Business Services Clean Technology Consumer Energy & Mining Financial Health Care Industrials Media Real Estate REIT Technology Transportation Total Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs
11
IPO Market Review Top Performing Growth IPOs Since 2012 – Through Year-End
10 of the top 20 growth since 2012 priced this year as the IPO market consistently outperformed
The average 1-day and
400% % Return Through Year-End of Pricing Year
sector IPO performers
384% 386%
2012
337%
2013
320%
2014
240%
160%
171% 172% 174% 154% 157% 159% 163% 164%
198% 204% 185% 191%
218% 218% 222%
236% 239%
80%
0%
Average Growth IPO Returns Returns by Year: & 30-Day Average IPO by1-Day Year: 1-Day & 30-Day
30-day returns for
45% 40%
growth IPOs were each
1-Day 30-Day
40%
35%
the 3rd highest since 2003 % Return
30%
25%
25% 20%
16%
20%
18% 13%
15%
14% 14% 13% 14%
16% 15% 12%
13%
14%
16%
27% 22%
19%
17%
17%
12%
10% 5%
-1%
0% -5%
2003
2004
2005
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size Includes Growth Sectors: Business Services, Clean Tech, Consumer, Health Care, TMT Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs
2006
2007
1%
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
12
IPO Market Review Only 46% of IPOs priced in 2014 priced at
Pricing & Aftermarket Performance IPO Pricing Performance - Pricing vs. Midpoint of the Range 60%
the midpoint of the
Below Midpoint
range, or above, versus
50%
60% in 2013
47%
Above Midpoint 39%
40%
% of IPOs
53%
At Midpoint 42%
40%
n = 140
n = 85 30%
n = 88
20%
n = 85
18% 15%
14%
10%
n = 37
n = 37
2013
2014
0%
68% of the IPOs priced in 2014 traded above
32%
2003-2012
IPO Aftermarket Performance - 1-Day Return vs. Offer Price 80%
offer price after 1-day,
Below Offer Price 70%
consistent with
66%
% of IPOs
68%
Above Offer Price
60%
historical norms
69%
Flat Offer Price
n = 144
n = 177
50% 40% 30%
26%
25%
24%
20% 10%
10%
0% 2003-2012
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs NOTE: Due to rounding, not all percentages add to exactly 100%
n = 52
n = 68 7%
6%
n = 14
n = 17
2013
2014
13
IPO Market Review Given the increase in IPO issuance versus
Pricing Pressure on IPOs Percentage of IPOs Priced Below the Range from 2003-2014 45%
enhanced pressure on
40%
price with nearly 40% pricing below the range
% IPOs Below Range
prior years, 2014 saw
41.8%
40.0% 35.6%
35%
34.5%
34.4%
31.4%
30%
39.3%
40.0%
27.6%
26.8%
27.1%
25% 20% 15%
10.5%
10% 5% 0% 2003
The discount from the
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
(26.6%)
(26.4%)
(26.7%)
FTO Discount of IPOs Priced Below the Range from 2003-2014 2003
midpoint for IPOs
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0%
priced below the range (5%)
recent years
% FTO Discount
remained consistent with
(10%) (15%) (18.6%)
(20%) (20.4%)
(22.9%)
(25%) (25.5%) (30%)
(24.7%)
(24.3%)
(25.8%)
(24.7%) (27.0%)
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs
14
IPO Market Review in 2014 raised between $50 and $200 million,
IPO Deal Value, Market Cap, and Financial Overview IPO Frequency by Deal Size 40%
consistent with 58% from 2010-13
involved issuers with
2010-2013 28%
30%
% of IPOs
53% of the IPO market
IPO Frequency by Market Cap
market caps less than
29%
14% 11%
11% 8%
6%
10% 5%
$50 million and 51%
$100200M
had negative operating,
5%
both greater than
0%
historical averages
17% 14%
15% 9%
4% 4%
$200$300- $500M$300M $500M $1B
$1B+
<$150M
16%
13%15%
13%
9%
$500$1B
$1B$5B
$5B+
2010-2013
51%
2014
40%
9%
8% 7%
% of IPOs
15%
$300500M
60%
2014
18% 16%16%
$150$300M
IPO Frequency by Operating Income (LTM)
50%
20%
15% 10%
23%
5%
4%
25%
25%
% of IPOs
LTM revenues less than
22% 20%
6%
2010-2013
20%
40% of 2014 IPOs had
$50$100M
30%
going public
21% 22% 20%
20%
10%
6%
IPO Frequency by Revenue (LTM)
of early-stage companies
2014
0%
<$50M
increase in the number
25%
25%
0%
2014 saw a steep
2010-2013
30%
20%
10%
$500 million in 2014
31% 30%
35%
2014
% of IPOs
60% of the IPOs issued
32% 30%
26%
20%
16%
14% 9%
10%
11% 12%
9% 8%
7% 6%
$100M$300M
$300M+
0%
Pre$0Revenue $50M
$50100M
$100- $200M- $500M$200M $500M $1B
$1B+
Negative
$0$10M
$1050M
$50$100M
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs
15
IPO Market Review Alongside the increase in issuance, 2014 also saw an uptick in the number
Current IPO Backlog 360-Day Backlog by Quarter 180
of IPOs filed publicly, signaling a strong
broader market
116
120
# of IPOs
tailwinds from the
152
147
139
140
outlook for the 2015 IPO market, assuming solid
162
160
160
106
107
100
113
111 92
120
136
123
118 107
98
95
96
80
88 81
74 66
73 60
60
52
103
48
53
60
59
36
40 20
84% of the IPOs priced
0
in 2014 were EGCâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s and approximately the same percentage of the yearend filed backlog are also EGC companies
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14
IPO Backlog by Sector (# of Deals) 40
35
30 20 10
34% of the IPOs in backlog at year-end were
0
13 8
12
11
Consumer
6
4
3 Clean Tech
11
Energy / Mining
Financial
Health Care
Industrials
REIT
TMT
Transports
in the health care space Source: Company Filings, Dealogic and Piper Jaffray ECM as of 12/31/14 Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs
16
Section III
Follow-on Offering Market Review
Follow-on Offering Market Review 2014 saw the second most follow-ons priced
Historical Volume Follow-on Activity by Year – Number of Deals
in 20 years
800
697
700
616
# of Follow-ons
600 500
632
Average = 500 491
488
603 542
460
469
458 395
400
536 463
368
477
531 442
436
300
645
251
200 100 0
However, the number of
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
follow-ons decreased by 8% from 2013, while
Follow-on Activity by Year – Capital Raised ($B) $240
by 17%
$200 Capital Raised ($B)
capital raised decreased
$222 $177
$194
$185 $166
$160
Average = $132B $116 $118
$120 $80
$69
$88
$93
$197 $169
$141 $136
$109 $101 $105 $104 $79
$75
$40 $0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size and CMFOs (URDs) Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs, PIPEs/RDs
18
Follow-on Offering Market Review Average follow-on performance through year-end fell when compared with 2013, driven largely by poor performance in the Energy & Mining sector
Performance by Sector 2014 Follow-on Activity Sector Business Services Clean Technology Consumer Energy & Mining Financial Health Care Industrials Media Real Estate REIT Technology Transportation Total
Number 13 17 43 101 100 146 38 3 2 77 75 30 645
Capital Raised ($B) $3.9 $1.0 $18.6 $39.6 $27.2 $21.0 $12.6 $0.3 $0.3 $18.7 $18.7 $7.0 $168.9
% Chg Price File to Offer -8.0% -15.0% -6.0% -4.0% -5.0% -8.0% -5.0% -3.0% -3.0% -4.0% -9.0% -4.0% -6.3%
% Chg Offer / 1-Day 0.0% 2.0% 2.0% 0.0% 1.0% 4.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 1.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.7%
% Chg Offer / 30-Day 2.0% 2.0% 1.0% -1.0% 1.0% 3.0% 1.0% 2.0% 5.0% 3.0% 1.0% 6.0% 1.7%
% Chg Offer / YE'14 13.0% -32.0% 8.0% -18.0% -4.0% 22.0% 5.0% 17.0% -2.0% 10.0% -3.0% -9.0% 2.3%
Capital Raised ($B) $12.3 $2.0 $16.6 $38.6 $24.4 $18.9 $20.3 $3.4 $4.4 $24.3 $24.8 $7.5 $197.5
% Chg Price File to Offer -4.7% 0.3% -3.6% -5.2% -3.6% -8.4% -4.4% -10.7% -3.5% -3.6% -7.5% -7.4% -5.5%
% Chg Offer / 1-Day 1.4% 5.8% 1.3% 0.6% 1.2% 3.4% 2.3% 1.8% 1.9% 1.1% 2.9% 0.4% 1.8%
% Chg Offer / 30-Day 4.8% 8.6% 2.9% 2.3% 3.0% 7.5% 5.5% 9.3% 3.1% 0.8% 5.6% 1.0% 4.3%
% Chg Offer / YE'13 18.8% 18.1% 9.3% 9.0% 13.8% 37.7% 23.3% 49.9% 26.1% -3.7% 29.3% 18.8% 18.5%
2013 Follow-on Activity Sector Business Services Clean Technology Consumer Energy & Mining Financial Health Care Industrials Media Real Estate REIT Technology Transportation Total
Number 28 12 43 115 109 125 47 14 9 87 73 35 697
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size and CMFOs (URDs) Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs, PIPEs/RDs
19
Follow-on Offering Market Review The follow-on pricing environment was slightly
Follow-on Pricing Performance â&#x20AC;&#x201C; File-to-Offer Discounts % Change File-to-Offer by Year
more challenging in 2014
0%
For the first time since 2009, follow-ons
% Chg File/Offer
than it was in 2013
registered a
-2% -4%
-2.7% -3.0%
-3.2% -4.3%
-3.3% -3.5% -4.0% -4.2%
-6%
-3.9% -5.3%
-4.0% -5.5% -5.9%
-4.0%
-6.1%
-5.5% -6.3%
-7.0%
-8% -8.3%
-10%
Mean
year-over-year increase
-3.9%
-4.9%
-8.4%
-7.8%
-9.9%
Median
-12%
in average FTO discount
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
% Change File-to-Offer by Month
Median % Change File/Offer
0% -2% -4%
-3.3% -3.8%
-2.8%
-3.0% -4.1%
-4.0%
-7.2%
-7.3%
-8%
-4.4%
-4.2%
-5.3%
-5.4%
-6%
-3.6%
-8.0%
-4.2% -4.5%
-5.2% -5.6% -5.4% -5.5%-5.7%-5.8%
-7.7%
-10% -12%
2013
2014
-12.2%
-14% Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size and CMFOs (URDs) Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs, PIPEs/RDs
20
Follow-on Offering Market Review Follow-on Offering Recap by Type, Market Value and Style Follow-on Type Breakdown (All)
significant execution
100%
vehicle in 2014, driven in part by first time (S-1) market post-IPO
15%
14%
26%
26%
80%
% of Offerings
filers coming back to
Follow-on Type Breakdown (Sub $2B Market Cap)
60% 13%
9%
9%
18%
23%
27%
24%
27%
19%
25%
40% 20%
Sub $2B follow-on
14%
46%
41%
42%
43%
40%
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Accelerated
declined of late as a
Bought
Marketed
Follow-on Activity by Market Cap (# of Offerings)
transactions
80%
73% 67%
66%
64% % of Offerings
21%
31%
32%
14%
14%
21%
29%
32%
20%
15%
10%
21%
80% 60% 40%
11%
13%
38%
35%
38%
42%
43%
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
20%
62%
60%
48% 32% 17%
19%
11%
15%
18% 16%
23% 14%
24% 17%
0% 2003-2010
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size and CMFOs (URDs) Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs, PIPEs/RDs Marketed Follow-ons defined as 2 or more days of public marketing
2011
2012
< $2B
$2B - $5B
Accelerated
CMFO (URD)
percentage of overall
16%
19%
0%
0%
issuance has steadily
100%
2013 > $5B
2014
Bought
Marketed
CMFO (URD)
Follow-ons w/ Selling Shareholders % Follow-ons w/ Selling Shareholders
continued to be a more
% of Offerings
Marketed follow-ons
100% 80%
31%
30%
29%
69%
70%
71%
36%
35%
64%
65%
60% 40% 20% 0% 2003-2010
2011
2012
No
2013
2014
Yes
21
Follow-on Offering Market Review Capital raised through
Growth Sector Marketed Follow-on Issuance: Capital Raised
significantly increased
$10
from 2012 to 2014 in Consumer and Health Care
Total Capital Raised ($B)
$12
50
$10.84
45
$8.92
40 $7.58
$8
$6.05
$6.47 $6
$5.42
$2 $0
$1.15 $0.47 n=11 n=5
$1.81 n=6
n=16 n=1
n=3
n=2
$0.23 $0.34 $0.07
$2.24
n=25
n=17
n=22
n=11
$1.96 n=13
$1.04
$2.40
$2.35
n=29
n=19
$1.44 $1.38
n=12
n=18
n=15
n=33
n=36 n=23
35 30 25
n=28
n=14
$4
$5.24
n=47
$4.84
$6.84 $6.64
$6.76
n=38
20 15 10 5
Number of Marketd Follow-ons
marketed follow-ons
0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Clean Tech
Consumer
Health Care
TMT/BS
Growth Sector Marketed Follow-on Issuance: Number of Transactions by Sector Health Care saw the
100%
marketed follow-ons in 2014 as the percentage of CMFOs (URDs) decreased
% of Growth Sector URDs
increase in number of
80% 60% 40% 20% 0%
36% 49%
41% $1,418
25%
$1,144
$1,043
18%
30%
16%
9% 2009
16% 2010 Clean Tech
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes fully marketed follow-ons greater than $20 million in deal size Excludes CEFs & BCC/SPACs Marketed Follow-ons defined as 2 or more days of public marketing
$1,952 43%
40% $1,215
28%
31%
26%
26%
9%
2%
3%
2011
2012
2013
26% 25%
Consumer
Health Care
$2,000
34%
TMT/BS
$1,500 44%
$1,000 $500
21% 2% 2014
$0
Avg Mkt Cap
22
Average Issuer Market Cap ($MM)
largest percentage
$2,500
$2,231
Follow-on Offering Market Review Growth Sector Marketed Follow-on Trends: Market Capitalization
In terms of average marketed follow-ons, the Consumer, Health Care, and TMT/BS sectors all gapped up in value
$4,200
$4,500
Average Issuer Mkt Cap ($MM)
issuer market cap for
$3,565
$3,600
$3,210
$2,700 $1,800 $900 $0
$1,549
$1,637
$1,921
$1,913
$1,861 $671
$1,153
$1,365 $788
$1,343
$2,217 $2,533 $1,541 $1,167
$422
$1,111
$557
$551
$411
2009
2010 Clean Tech
2011 Consumer
$453 2012 Health Care
2013
$142 2014
TMT/BS
Growth Sector Marketed Follow-on Trends: Deal Value Average deal sizes in Consumer and Health Care spiked in 2014
) M M $( e u la V la e D re u ss I eg ar ev A
$500 $400
$493
$462 $357
$339
$302
$300 $203 $200 $100
$151 $124
$285
$228
$241
$225
$183
$180 $113
$105
$95
$87
$80
$92
$83
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
$185 $161 $36
$0 Clean Tech Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes fully marketed follow-ons greater than $20 million in deal size Excludes CEFs & BCC/SPACs Marketed Follow-ons defined as 2 or more days of public marketing
Consumer
Health Care
2014
TMT/BS
23
Follow-on Offering Market Review Follow-ons continue to represent the majority of
Equity Issuance Breakdown Number of Deals by Type (IPOs & Follow-ons)
equity issuance activity
# IPOs
# of FOs
100%
% of Deals
80% 60%
70%
0%
last 12 years, due in large part to the $25 billion Alibaba IPO
89%
91%
11%
9%
2008
2009
78%
78%
80%
77%
71%
30%
30%
29%
33%
22%
22%
20%
23%
29%
2004
2005
2006
2007
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Capital Raised by Type (IPOs & Follow-ons) Capital Raised: IPOs
Capital Raised: FOs
100% Capital Raised
capital raised over the
67%
14%
2003
largest percentage of
71%
40% 20%
IPOs accounted for the
70%
86%
80%
81%
66%
72%
69%
67%
86%
92%
76%
77%
60%
81%
77%
19%
23%
2012
2013
64%
40% 20%
34%
28%
31%
33%
19%
14%
0% 2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
24%
23%
2010
2011
8%
2009
36%
2014
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size and CMFOs (URDs) Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs, PIPEs/RDs
24
Follow-on Offering Market Review Small cap issuers
Follow-on Deal Value and Market Cap Overview
typically approximately
Median Follow-on Raise (All Deals)
15% – 20% of their pre-
20%
% Deal Value / Pre-Deal Market Cap
deal market caps
Median Follow-on Raise (Sub $2B)
15%
18.2% 15.1%
14.5%
14.1%
14.1%
18.0%
18.1%
17.9%
2011
2012
2013
16.8%
12.8%
10%
5%
0% 2003-2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2003-2010
2014
Follow-on Frequency by Pre-Deal Market Cap 175
has been dominated by
150
issuers with market
125
values between $1 – $5B at the time of the offering
# of Follow-ons
Activity in recent years
124
100 75 50
88
74 53
56 38 42
45
65 64 50
59
66 59 71
73
152147
142
76
89
99
110
110 89 79
93
88
83
74 77 56
96 101
63
25 0 <$150M
$150-$300M
$300-$500M 2010
$500M-$1B 2011
2012
$1-$2B 2013
$2-$5B
$5B+
2014
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size and CMFOs (URDs) Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs, PIPEs/RDs
25
Follow-on Offering Market Review back to market for a first follow-on in 2014 more
IPOs Back-to-Market(1) # First Follow-ons
# of First Follow-ons
First follow-ons in 2014
80
52
49
50 40
32
30
22
18 9
26
20%
12%
16%
11%
8%
5% 2006 2007 100% Primary
200
74%
67% 47%
63%
63%
58%
60%
77%
51%
51%
40% 20% 0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $20 million in deal size (1) First follow-ons classified as those that returned to market within 365 days of IPO Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs, PIPEs/RDs
Median # Days from IPO to FO Filing
80%
Median % Return
months
27% 25%
34% 33% 33%
2008 2009 2010 2011 Primary / Secondary Mix
2012 2013 2014 100% Secondary
Days Back-to-Market from IPO
Assuming strong
to market within 4-7
32%
30%
100%
average IPO comes back
33%
48%
44% 41%38%
39%40%
40%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Performance from IPO to Follow-on Filing
performance, the
44%
0%
0
follow-on filing
54%
50%
10%
5
64%
60%
56% 55%
50%
60
10
63% from IPO to
60%
70
20
were up a median of
70%
85
90
times than any year on record
First Follow-on Primary / Secondary Mix
% of Offerings
Recent IPO issuers came
160
181
176
170
165 149
171
165
166
132 120 80 40 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
26
Follow-on Offering Market Review EDPs continue to be a popular capital raising method in 2014
Equity Distribution Programs (EDPs) Number of Announced EDPs since 2006
Total Value of EDPs Announced since 2006 ($MM)* 190
200
183
180 140
concentrated in the Health Care, REIT, and Energy & Mining sectors
106
$25,000
115
80
$15,000
57
60
$21,173
$12,380
20
15
2006
2007
$5,000
$14,812
$9,126
$10,000 $2,122 $2,052
$0
0 2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
88 of the 183 (48%) EDP
2006
2014
2014 EDPs by Sector
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014 EDPs by Market Capitalization 60
Health Care 30%
programs were for
50
issuers of less than
40 Real Estate / Property 30%
# of EDPs
$500MM of market
$22,715
$20,000
100
20
$28,711
$30,000
129
120
120
40
$35,407
$35,000
160
Activity was
$40,000
value
57
38 31
31
30
26
20 Energy & Mining 22% Other 4% TMT / BS 3%
10 0
Financial 11%
<$200
$200 - $500
$500 - $2B
$2B - $5B
>$5B
Source: Piper Jaffray ECM and Dealogic *Excludes Citigroup’s 2010 $37.4B EDP & Bank of America’s 2009 $16.9B Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs
27
2014
Section IV
Confidentially Marketed Follow-on (URD), Registered Direct & PIPE Market Review
Confidentially Marketed Follow-on (URD), Registered Direct & PIPE Market Review Historical Volume
PIPE/RD/CMFO (URD) historical
PIPE/RD/CMFO (URD) Number of Deals by Year
herein
600
$35
583
$29.6
$30
500
410
394
400
313
308
300
273
298
277
200 100
Capital Raised ($B)
700
# of PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs)
issuance is outlined
PIPE/RD/CMFO (URD) Capital Raised by Year
$25
$23.8
$22.9
$22.6
$20
$15.4
$15
$13.3
$15.4 $12.2
$10 $5
0 2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
$0 2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Quarterly PIPE/RD/CMFO (URD) Activity 250
$12.0 205
$8.0 $6.0
200 158 121 118
102 118 79
$4.0
103
99
150 113 112
77 54
110 110 105 75
56
96
73 46 47
68
66
66
77
63
79 79
100
80 52
49
$2.0 $0.0
$5.8 $8.1 $3.7 $5.3 $4.4 $5.0 $9.6$10.6$3.0$10.5$5.5 $4.8 $5.1 $5.8 $6.1 $5.6 $5.3 $5.4 $2.2 $2.4 $4.5 $2.8 $2.9 $3.1 $6.2 $2.6 $3.3 $3.3 $3.9 $3.6 $2.3 $2.4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 '07 '07 '07 '07 '08 '08 '08 '08 '09 '09 '09 '09 '10 '10 '10 '10 '11 '11 '11 '11 '12 '12 '12 '12 '13 '13 '13 '13 '14 '14 '14 '14 Capital Raised ($B)
# of PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs)
Source: PlacementTracker.com as of December 31, 2014. Includes all common stock, convertible preferred and convertible debt PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs) with proceeds greater than $10 million. Excludes strategic transactions over $200 million.
29
50 0
# of PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs)
Capital Raised ($B)
$10.0
Confidentially Marketed Follow-on (URD), Registered Direct & PIPE Market Review (Check Data With Tim) Registered shelf takedown offerings
Trends in Deal Size and Issuer Size Median PIPE Deal Size and Mkt Cap
Median RD/CMFO (URD) Deal Size and Mkt Cap
Deal Size Mkt Cap ($MM) ($MM) 100 $300 $262 $244 90 $250 $224 80 $215 $204 $197 $186 70 $185 $200 60 $150 $40 $40 $40 $40 $44 $45 50 $38 $39 40 $100 30 20 $50 10 $0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
continued to be a favored source of equity capital financing for small cap issuers
Mkt Cap ($MM) $400
Deal Size ($MM) 100 90 $319 $287 $291 $285 80 $256 $251 70 $238 60 $204 $44 $46 $46 $44 50 $40 $33 $34 40 $30 30 20 10 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
$350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0
Median Issuer Market Cap Median PIPE Deal Size
Median Issuer Market Cap Median RD/CMFO(URD) Deal Size
Number of PIPEs
Number of RDs/CMFOs (URDs) 150
# of PIPEs
223
200 147
127
110
100
88
79
81
72
0
# of RDs/CMFOs (URDs)
300
125
108
112 96
100
81
79
84
2013
2014
75 50
47
35
25 0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Source: PlacementTracker.com as of December 31, 2014. Includes all common stock, convertible preferred and convertible debt PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs) with proceeds greater than $10 million. Excludes strategic transactions over $200 million.
30
Confidentially Marketed Follow-on (URD), Registered Direct & PIPE Market Review Historical PIPE/RD/CMFO (URD) Volume by Piper Jaffray Covered Sector Health Care
Technology, Media & Telecom
150
131 131
125
113
100
103
82
116
90
75 50 25 0
$4.6
$2.1
$3.1
$3.2
$3.1
$5.3
$4.6
$4.0
175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
175 150 125 100 75 46 20
25 0
$4.6
$2.9
$2.0
48
47
48
42 24
$2.7
$1.7
$3.0
$0.6
$3.0
33 $0.8
Financial
200
50
32
$2.1
23 $3.1
11
$3.2
14 $0.7
15 $1.7
18 $0.5
21 $0.5
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
# of PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs)
# of PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs)
Consumer
93
# of PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs)
163
175 150 125
104
100 50
61
64
60
39
33
36
33
25 0
$2.9
$1.1
$7.0
70 48 $3.1
$2.4
39 $2.7
43
30 $1.4
$2.4
41 $2.2
China Growth
200
75
49
62
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
$2.0
$2.7
$1.7
$3.5
$1.4
$1.8
$1.5
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
# of PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs)
175
200
200 # of PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs)
# of PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs)
200
Clean Tech & Industrials
200 175 150 125 100 75 45
50 25 0
21 $1.1
44
25 $7.0
14 $3.1
$2.4
$0.6
5
2 $0.4
$3.2
2 $0.1
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Source: PlacementTracker.com as of December 31, 2014. Includes all common stock, convertible preferred and convertible debt PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs) with proceeds greater than $10 million. Excludes strategic transactions over $200 million.
31
Confidentially Marketed Follow-on (URD), Registered Direct & PIPE Market Review Issuers with market caps below $500MM accounted for 92% of
Historical Volume by Issuer Market Cap Capital Raised ($B) by Issuer Market Cap $9.0
PIPE/RD/CMFO (URD) transactions in
$8.0
$17.8
(a)
$7.0
Capital Raised ($B)
2014
$8.5
$6.0
$5.5
$5.4
$5.2
$4.8
$5.0 $4.4
$4.0
$6.6
$10.5
$3.7
$4.5
$4.3 $3.9
$3.9
$3.9 $3.5
$6.5
$3.5
$3.1
$3.0
$2.6
$2.8
$2.6
$2.6
$2.3
$3.3
$2.7 $2.3
$2.2 $1.8
$3.1
$2.9
$2.6
$2.6
$2.4
$2.0
$3.1
$1.8
$1.9
$1.7
$2.0
$1.4
$1.0 $0.0 2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Market Cap of PIPE/RD/CMFO (URD) Issuers Under $100MM
$100MM - $249MM
Source: PlacementTracker.com as of December 31, 2014. Includes all common stock, convertible preferred and convertible debt PIPEs/RDs/CMFOs (URDs) with proceeds greater than $10 million. Excludes strategic transactions over $200 million. (a) Percentage based on number of financings.
$250MM - $499MM
$500MM - $1B
Over $1B
32
Section V
Convertible Market Review
Convertible Market Review $51B of capital was
Capital Raised ($B) by Issuer Market Value
raised in the convertible
$51
$25
market in 2014
$23
representing a 3% increase vs. 2013
$49 $20
Historically, this
$19
$32
represents the highest convertible capital raised since 2008 Average annual issuance over the last 10 years was
Capital Raised ($B)
annual amount of
$27
$15
$15
$14
$22
$13
$12 $10
$10
$9
$9 $7
$7
$49.4B The convertible new
$15
$15
$5
$5
$5
issue market in 2014 was $0
overweight in large caps
$1
$0
$1
$1
$0
75% of 2014 new issue
2010
2011
market cap
2013
2014
Market Cap of Convertible Issuers
dollars came from issuers with $2B+
2012
Under $300MM
$300MM - $2B
$2B - $10B
Over $10B
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Excludes GMâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 2010 mandatory convertible issued concurrently with its IPO
34
Convertible Market Review: Sizing Trends Market Cap < $2B:
Trends in Deal Size and Issuer Size ($ in millions)
Deal Size as a Percent of Market Cap: • 2012: 22.7% • 2013: 21.2% • 2014: 19.7%
Market Cap < $2B: Median Convertible Deal Size and Issuer Market Cap $900
$7,000
$700
Deal Size as a Percent of
$818
$780
$800
Market Cap >$2B:
Market Cap >$2B: Median Convertible Deal Size and Issuer Market Cap
$662 $5,000
Market Cap:
$600
• 2012: 9.9%
$500
$5,957
$6,000 $5,098
$5,046
$4,000
• 2013: 7.8% • 2014: 8.5%
$400
$3,000
$300 $2,000 $200
$150
$165
$161 $1,000
$100 $0
$500
$400
$509
$0 2012
2013
2014
2012
2013
Median Issuer Market Cap
Median Issuer Market Cap
Median Convertible Deal Size
Median Convertible Deal Size
2014
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM
35
Convertible Market Review: PJC’s Target Market PJC’s target market is
Capital Raised by Sector ($B)
defined as those companies
Sector
2012
2013
2014
with < $2B of market
Health Care
$2.0
$2.5
$4.4
capitalization within the
TMT
$0.5
$3.1
$1.9
following key sectors:
Clean Tech
$0.7
$0.9
$1.0
• Health Care
PJC Addressable Market Overview ($B)
Consumer
$0.2
$1.1
$0.1
• TMT
Financial
$2.1
$4.1
$1.9
• Clean Technology
Real Estate
$0.8
$0.6
$1.0
Industrial
$0.7
$0.8
$0.5
Energy
$1.7
$2.0
$1.0
Other
$0.9
$0.6
$0.8
Total
$9.6
$15.8
$12.4
• Consumer Issuers meeting our target market cap raised $12.4B in 2014 versus $15.8B in 2013 (decrease of 22%)
2013 Convertible Issuance ($ Volume)
Average annual issuance
Energy & Mining 13%
over the last 10 years for <$2B market cap issuers was $12.3B PJC’s overall 2014 addressable target market
Other 4%
decreased about 3% to
PJC Addressable Market All Others
$15 $12.4 $12
$9.6
$8.2 $5.0
$9 $6
$6.2
$3
$7.6
$7.4
2013
2014
$3.4 $0 2012
Energy & Mining 8%
Health Care 16%
Other 6%
Industrials 4%
Health Care 35%
Real Estate 8% Technology 20%
$7.4B vs. $7.6B in 2013 Legend
$15.8
2014 Convertible Issuance ($ Volume)
Industrials 5% Real Estate 4%
$18
Financial 15% Financial 26%
Clean Tech 6% Consumer 7%
Consumer Clean Tech 1% 8%
Technology 15%
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM
36
Convertible Market Review: PJC’s Target Market Since 2013, the PJC
PJC Addressable Market
addressable market
$6.0
sectors have constituted more than 53% of all $5.1
sub-$2B issuance
sector as a percent of addressable market issuance is: • Health Care = 46% • TMT = 33%
Capital Raised ($B)
The breakdown of each
$5.0
$4.7
$4.0
$3.9 $2.7
$2.4
$3.4 $3.0
$3.0
$2.0 $2.6
• Clean Tech = 13% • Consumer = 8%
$3.5
$0.5
$1.8
$2.2
$2.1
$0.9
$2.0
$0.8 $2.4
$2.5
$2.3
$1.0
$1.7
$1.6
$1.9 $1.3
$1.2 Legend PJC Addressable Market All Others
$0.0 Q1 '13
Q2 '13
Q3 '13
Q4 '13
Q1 '14
Q2 '14
Q3 '14
Q4 '14
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM
37
Convertible Market Review: PJC’s Target Market convertible issuance in
Historical Convertible Volume Convertible Issues by Year
2014 was driven by large
160
cap issuers
140
Convertible Capital Raised by Year 128
25% ($12B) of volume was generated by issuers with a sub-$2B market cap compared with the
# of Convertibles
120 100
62 89
58
85
78
80 41
60
35
22 82
40
70
56
50
48
20
10 year average of 27%
$60
144
2012
2013
9 20
Sub-$2B Issuers All Others
21
32 17
33
29 11
18
28
14 13 28
15
22
19
21
15
24 9
Capital Raised ($B)
# of Convertibles Legend
25 30
$16
$12
2013
2014
$22
$23
$19
$12
$9
$8
$10
2010
2011
2012
$19
$20
43
10
$20
$27
$25
53
40
$38
$32
Convertible Capital Raised by Quarter
50
30
$30
2014
Convertible Issues by Quarter 60
$33
$40
$0 2011
$51
$10
0 2010
$49
$50 Capital Raised ($B)
Like previous years,
$16 $15 $11 $6
$8
$5
$12
$12
$3
$3
$11
$12
$7
$8
$9
$4 $5
$0 Q1 '13 Q2 '13 Q3 '13 Q4 '13 Q1 '14 Q2 '14 Q3 '14 Q4 '14
$15
$10
15
0
$11
$5
$3
$4
$3
$9 $2
Q1 '13 Q2 '13 Q3 '13 Q4 '13 Q1 '14 Q2 '14 Q3 '14 Q4 '14
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Excludes GM’s 2010 mandatory convertible issued concurrently with its IPO
38
Convertible Market Review: Sub-$2B Issuers decreased issuance
Historical Convertible Volume by Sector Consumer
volume by about 22%
Sectors strategic to Piper among sub-$2B issuers comprised 14% ($7.4B) of total issuance volume
# of Convertibles
versus 2013
TMT
15
50
12
40 $4.6
9 $1.7 6 3
by all issuers 0
$2.1 3
2 $0.9
7
# of Convertibles
Sub-$2B issuers
$0.7
1
1 1
1 1
2010
2011
2012
1 2013
Sub-$2B Issuers All Others
7
23 $3.3 5
11 2011
16
11
7 2012
2013
2014
14
$4.4
12 $5.7
20
$4.6 $5.3 6 6 6
8
9 $4.9 23
4 15
9
9
2011
2012
# of Convertibles
# of Convertibles Legend
9
2010
$7.9
25
5
11
0
30
10
20
$7.5
Clean Tech
35
15
27 $6.5
2014
Health Care
$17.4
30
10
4
$21.4
$2.1
10 8 6 4 2
0 4
0
0 2010
2013
2014
3
$0.9 $0.7
2010
5
$0.7 3
2 2011
0
7
6
3 2012
2013
2014
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Excludes GMâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 2010 mandatory convertible issued concurrently with its IPO Dollar amounts denote total capital raised in billions by all issuers
39
Appendix A
Piper Jaffray Credentials
Piper Jaffray U.S. Equity Capital Markets Review Piper Jaffray was a top sub $2B growth sector bookrunner in 2014,
Most Active Sub $2B Growth Sector Bookrunners in 2014 (# of Deals) IPOs & FOs/CMFOs – Sub $2B Growth
completing 40 bookrun IPOs & Followons/CMFOs, including 22 IPOs
Rank Manager
IPOs – Sub $2B Growth
Bookrun Bookrun Market Deal Value Number Share ($B) 67
Rank Manager
Bookrun Bookrun Market Deal Value ($B) Number Share
$7.0
1
Credit Suisse
17.4%
$8.7
2
Jefferies
31
19.7%
$3.7
16.0%
$8.0
3
JPMorgan
31
19.7%
$4.1
$8.9
4
Morgan Stanley
30
19.1%
$4.9
12.4%
$5.8
5
Goldman Sachs
26
16.6%
$3.9
11.8%
$7.5
6
Piper Jaffray & Co
22
14.0%
$2.6
11.8%
$6.6
7
Stifel Nicolaus & Co
18
11.5%
$3.7
11.0%
$6.2
8
Leerink Swann & Co
18
11.5%
$2.7
$5.1
9
Citigroup
18
11.5%
$2.4 $2.5
1
Jefferies
18.5%
2
JPMorgan
63
3
Credit Suisse
58
4
Morgan Stanley
58
16.0%
5
BofA Merrill Lynch
45
6
Cowen & Co
43
7
Goldman Sachs
43
8
Piper Jaffray & Co
40
9
Citigroup
37
10.2%
36
22.9%
$5.2
10
Deutsche Bank
35
9.6%
$5.7
10
BofA Merrill Lynch
18
11.5%
11
Leerink Swann & Co
33
9.1%
$4.8
11
Barclays Bank
17
10.8%
$2.3
12
Stifel Nicolaus & Co
32
8.8%
$6.9
12
Cowen & Co
15
9.6%
$2.6
13
Barclays Bank
32
8.8%
$4.2
13
RBC Capital Markets
15
9.6%
$2.3
14
William Blair & Co
23
6.3%
$8.0
14
Deutsche Bank
14
8.9%
$2.7
15
RBC Capital Markets
23
6.3%
$3.4
15
Wells Fargo Securities
12
7.6%
$2.4
16
Wells Fargo Securities
20
5.5%
$4.4
16
UBS Securities Inc
12
7.6%
$2.1
17
BMO Capital Markets
20
5.5%
$3.9
17
BMO Capital Markets
9
5.7%
$1.5
18
Robert W Baird & Co
15
4.1%
$3.7
18
William Blair & Co
8
5.1%
$4.4
19
UBS Securities Inc
15
4.1%
$2.3
19
Robert W Baird & Co
8
5.1%
$2.2
20
Raymond James & Associates Inc
14
3.9%
$3.7
20
JMP Securities LLC
6
3.8%
$2.4
21
Canaccord Genuity
10
2.8%
$4.6
21
Raymond James & Associates Inc
5
3.2%
$2.0
22
Roth Capital Partners
10
2.8%
$2.1
22
Roth Capital Partners
3
1.9%
$0.3
23
Needham & Co Inc
8
2.2%
$3.6
23
Guggenheim Securities LLC
3
1.9%
$0.7
24
JMP Securities LLC
7
1.9%
$4.6
24
Aegis Capital Corp
3
1.9%
$0.1
25
Guggenheim Securities LLC
7
1.9%
$1.5
25
Canaccord Genuity
2
1.3%
$2.7
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $10 million in deal size with sub $2B post-deal market value Growth Sectors Include: Business Services, Clean Tech, Consumer, Healthcare, TMT Excludes CEFs, BCC/SPACs, PIPE/RDs, EDPs, Block Trades & Reg D / Reg S
41
Piper Jaffray U.S. Equity Capital Markets Review 2014 Piper Jaffray Bookrun Offerings
Source: Dealogic & Piper Jaffray ECM Includes deals greater than $10 million in deal size Includes PIPEs; Excludes Block Trades
42
PJC Provides Unparalleled Aftermarket Support % of IPOs for which Bookrunner is a Top 3 Trader
Piper Jaffray provides unparalleled aftermarket support for its bookrun clients
100%
100%
97% 87%
86%
75%
85%
81% 65%
64%
63%
63%
56%
50%
52%
50% 39%
25%
0% Piper UBS / Jaffray Schwab
RBC
BAML Jefferies Morgan Goldman JP Deutsche Stanley Sachs Morgan Bank
Citi
Baird
Barclays Cowen
Wells Fargo
Supporting Our Clients in the Aftermarket Commitment to Aftermarket Trading Support
Corporate and Venture Services
Piper Jaffray Conferences and Corporate Events
Commitment to Research Coverage
Non-Deal Roadshows
Consistent Capital Markets Dialogue
M&A Idea Generation and Execution
Customer and Partner Introductions
International Support
Source: Autex Blockdata; Data as of December 31, 2014 Includes IPOs since 2006 Trading data is based on the first 12 months of trading Excludes passive bookrunner roles denoted by economics of less than 20% UBS/Schwab rankings included only on UBS bookrun transactions
43
Strong Track Record of Successful Bookrun IPOs Bookrun IPO Aftermarket Performance â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 30-Day(1)
Consistent Bookrun IPO Success $103,500,000
$92,000,000
$60,183,000
$63,250,000
Initial Public Offering
Initial Public Offering
Initial Public Offering
Initial Public Offering
PJC BAIRD WELLS
JPM
36% Cowen & Co
35%
Morgan Stanley
25%
November 19, 2014
Robert W Baird & Co
24%
Citigroup
24%
Leerink Swann & Co
24%
23%
Jefferies
23%
Raymond James & Associates Inc
PJC
October 29, 2014
STFL
JPM
PJC
July 25, 2014
July 23, 2014
$78,571,438
$86,250,000
$110,400,000
$147,375,000
Initial Public Offering
Initial Public Offering
Initial Public Offering
DB
JPM
PJC
PJC
PJC
CS
Initial Public Offering PJC
BARC WF
June 25, 2014
June 24, 2014
June 24, 2014
May 7, 2014
$100,624,980
$49,301,936
$73,968,000
$138,000,000
23%
JPMorgan
Credit Suisse
JEFF
25%
Stifel Nicolaus & Co
Goldman Sachs
PJC
22%
Initial Public Offering JEFF
PJC
BAIRD
Initial Public Offering CS
PJC
Initial Public Offering JPM
PJC
Initial Public Offering BAML
PJC
April 10, 2014
April 9, 2014
November 21, 2013
November 13, 2013
$97,180,000
$86,250,000
$41,400,000
$96,600,000
21%
BofA Merrill Lynch
20%
BMO Capital Markets
20%
Wells Fargo Securities
20%
Initial Public Offering PJC
CITI
October 17, 2013
Source: Piper Jaffray ECM & Dealogic Data is through 12/31/2014 (1) Includes IPOs greater than $20 million since 2013 (Excludes BCC/SPACs & CEFs); Includes managers with at least 15 bookrun IPOs since 2013
Initial Public Offering PJC
BLAIR WELLS
October 8, 2013
Initial Public Offering RAYJ
PJC
September 25, 2013
Initial Public Offering DB
PJC
April 11, 2013
44
2014 Financial Sponsor Equity Transactions $157,142,850
A portfolio company of Wayzata Investment Partners
$103,500,000
A portfolio company of KarpReilly
$893,593,125
$139,840,000
A portfolio company of Foxteq Holdings
A portfolio company of Brentwood Associates
A portfolio company of Capital Southwest Corporation
A portfolio company of Freeman Spogli & Co.
$85,166,230
$92,000,000
Initial Public Offering Bookrunner November 2014
Initial Public Offering Bookrunner November 2014
Follow On Offering Bookrunner November 2014
Follow On Offering Bookrunner November 2014
Follow On Offering Bookrunner November 2014
Initial Public Offering Bookrunner October 2014
$108,235,280
$366,850,000
$185,610,000
$156,543,750
$1,001,937,500
$109,900,560
A portfolio company of Great Hill Partners
A portfolio company of Ares Management
A portfolio company of Brentwood Associates
A portfolio company of The Blackstone Group
A portfolio company of The Goldman Sachs Group
Initial Public Offering
Initial Public Offering
Follow On Offering
Initial Public Offering Co-Manager
Follow On Offering
A portfolio company of Oak Hill Capital Partners Initial Public Offering Bookrunner October 2014
Co-Manager October 2014
Bookrunner September 2014
Co-Manager August 2014
$42,200,000
$89,125,000
$86,300,000
$472,222,226
A portfolio company of KPCB Holdings Initial Public Offering
A portfolio company of The Compass Group Follow On Offering Bookrunner July 2014
Bookrunner July 2014
A portfolio company of Clayton Dubilier & Rice Follow On Offering Bookrunner October 2013
July 2014 $491,280,000
$701,845,000
A portfolio company of The Blackstone Group
A portfolio company of Foxteq Holdings
A portfolio company of Clayton Dubilier & Rice
Initial Public Offering Co-Manager June 2014
Initial Public Offering Co-Manager June 2014
$123,970,000
$147,375,000
$111,913,599
$132,050,000
A portfolio company of Sterling Partners
A portfolio company of Welsh Carson Anderson & Stowe
A portfolio company of Austin Ventures
A portfolio company of Seidler Equity Partners
A portfolio company of Brentwood Associates
Initial Public Offering Co-Manager June 2014 $517,500,000
A portfolio company of The Blackstone Group
Follow On Offering Co-Manager April 2014
Co-Manager July 2014
$100,624,980
Initial Public Offering Co-Manager June 2014 $1,495,000,000
A portfolio company of TPG Capital
Follow-On Offering
Initial Public Offering
Initial Public Offering
Bookrunner May 2014
Bookrunner May 2014
Co-Manager April 2014
Bookrunner April 2014
Co-Manager April 2014
$495,500,000
$897,000,000
$964,562,500
$91,800,000
A portfolio company of Clayton Dubilier & Rice
A portfolio company of Forbion Capital Partners
Initial Public Offering
A portfolio company of Apax Partners
A portfolio company of 3i Group/TPG Capital
Initial Public Offering Co-Manager March 2014
Follow On Offering Co-Manager March 2014
$94,084,375
A portfolio company of Camden Partners Holdings Follow On Offering Bookrunner
February 2014
Follow On Offering Co-Manager February 2014
Initial Public Offering
Initial Public Offering Bookrunner February 2014
45