Parish House (Honeycomb) by Povilas Mikuta

HONEYCOMB Jelling Sognehus

CONTENTS

SITE PLAN 1:200 3 GROUNDFLOOR PLAN 1:100 4 1st FLOOR PLAN 1:100 5 BASEMENT PLAN 1:100 6 SECTION A-A 1:100 7 SECTION B-B 1:100 8 EAST FACADE 1:100 9 WEST FACADE 1:100 10 NORTH FACADE 1:100 11 SOUTH FACADE 1:100 12 VENTILATION MODES 13 MATERIALS 14 STRUCTURE 15 COST ESTIMATION 17

ANALYSIS ROOM SCHEDULE 19 ROOM FUNCIONING 22 DAYLIGHT ANALYSIS 25 U-VALUE ANALYSIS 27 SOUND ANALYSIS 31 FIRE ANALYSIS 35 SERVICE ANALYSIS 39 STATICAL ANALYSIS 42

GORMSGADE

VESTERGADE

SITE PLAN 1:200 2

SECTION A-A

SECTION B-B

GROUNDFLOOR PLAN 1:100 3

SECTION A-A

SECTION B-B

1st FLOOR PLAN 1:100

SECTION A-A

SECTION B-B

BASEMENT PLAN 1:100 5

SECTION A-A 1:100

SECTION B-B 1:100

EAST FACADE 1:100

WEST FACADE 1:100

NORTH FACADE 1:100

SOUTH FACADE 1:100

VENTILATION MODES

Natural Ventilation Summer Mode

Combined Ventilation (Winter Mode) In order to minimize heat loss due to ventilation in winter time a mechanical air handling unit with heat recovery will be used. Fresh air taken from the outside will be heated up by warn stale air which is being extracted from the building. If for some reason mechanical ventilation is not enough, a natural ventilation can efficeintly supplement it, by providing additional fresh air intake and extraction due to stack effect. Although natural extraction will deny the benefit on saving energy on heat recovery.

Three different types of natural ventilation are combined in the project to ensure high quality natural ventilation. On the groundfloor single sided window configuration ensures natural ventilation up to 6m into the depth of the room. Specific window opening possibility creating vents at different levels (top and bottom of the widow) enables more efficient single sided window ventilation. Openings in partition wall with the corridor creates possibility for effective cross ventilation. On the first floor ventilation is mainly run by the natural stack effect. Fresh air flowing through windows on the facade, passing through the openings in the corridor walls and escaping near the ridge of the roof. This combination of natural ventilation principles will ensure energy free air flow throughout the building.

MATERIALS 



   

   

     

 

    

   Λ 

       

     13

STRUCTURE 



   





 

 14

COST ESTIMATION



 





 





















        

        

 

 

         

              

 

  

   



 







Project is scheduled to be finished by the end of 2014. With all design phases, gearing up and construction total project duration is 15 months. However since building will be built using CLT wooden elements which are key to fast construction we are hoping that in a later project phase more precise schedule will show that it is possible to complete project even faster.





In this project phase two steps of successive estimation was used to evaluate economy of the building. First step ended up with uncertainty of 6,6% therefore in next step we tried two provide more specific price of the project and uncertainty was reduced to around 3,1%.











        

        

        

        

        

        

        

        

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



















   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

      

       

       

       

 

   

 



October

November

December

January

 

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

   

October

November

December

Outline Scheme Design Detail 1 Detail 2 Calculation of tender bids Consideration of tender bids Preparation for the construction Construction

2013

2014

ANALYSIS

ROOM SCHEDULE

ROOM FUNCIONING

DAYLIGHT ANALYSIS

Efficient utilization of daylight can be on of the best ways to reduce energy use in buildings. Especially when it comes to office buildings where artificial lighting accounts for 25 -35 % of total energy use. By effectively utilizing daylight energy bill will be reduced considerably. In order to utitlize daylight without further compromising energy frame a number of windows were placed towards atrium and double height multiroom, dragging in considerable amount of daylight from these areas. Illustrations show daylight analysis made with Ecotect Analysis tool. Color gama shows daylight factor accross the building. Color gamma is showing a daylight factor [%] places in the range of 2 - 5% of daylight is considered well light and will need very little of artificial lighting. Places were daylight factor is less than 2% will be dimly lit and will definitely require sufficient artificial lighting. Here are some recomended values of daylight depending on the funtion of the area: Classroom / Conference area Office / Retail Walkways and Circulation areas

3% â&#x2030;Ľ2% 1%

Areas where daylight factor exceed value of 5 - 7% will suffer from glare and overheating due to the sun in the summer months and therefore some form of solar shading regulating amount of sunlight getting through to the building is necessary.

While renderings are often used to evaluate how successful design is lightwise, it is not completely right approach to measure light values, because human eye can adjust to a wide range of illumination levels. For example just try to look at any 3D rendering and tell if the wall gets 100 times more light than ceiling. Those renderings only show luminance (light reflected off the objects) which can be usefull while evaluating light distribution and glare it will not tell you if room has enough light for it’s intended use.

1.fig Cemenetry Office September 21st 12:00

3.fig Multiroom September 21st 12:00

2.fig Pastor’s Offvice September 21st 12:00

4.fig Hall Septemeber 21st 12:00

For this purpose we can employ direct illuminance renderings to show us how much light will be in defferent areas of the building. Amount of light available at a specific point is visulaized through color scale representing the amount of luminous flux, or the lux. This technique can be used for both daylight and artificial lighting, however since we are more interested in natural light levels daylight is our priority. Autumn equinox 21st of September 12:00 is often picked as a standard time to get average values of daylight throughout a year. Some typical recomendations from Illuminating Engineering Society for minimum illumination are: • Conference areas: 215-540 lux • Lobby and Reception: 0-215 lux • School reading areas: 215-1080 lux • Hotel corridors: 110-215 lux

5.fig Meeting room September 21st 9:00

6.fig Lobby September 21st 12:00

U-VALUE ANALYSIS

SOUND ANALYSIS

FIRE ANALYSIS

SERVICE ANALYSIS

STATICAL ANALYSIS