0 +65»; 302, ,=(5.,30:4 CO N FE S S I O N S O F AN EVA NGELISM P ROFESSO R— AN D T H E H O L I S T IC A P P R O AC H THAT MAKES “B E A R I N G WITNESS” BEA RA BLE
BY AL TIZON
I don’t like evangelism, at least as it is often understood and/ or executed. I cringe at tacky tracts and mechanical formulas and culturally insensitive strategies, even while I concede that God can and occasionally does use some of these things to draw people to himself. I was in Vietnam in the early ‘90s, a time when evangelism was being outlawed. Preaching the gospel was only permitted within the walls of a church. As much as I may dislike the idea of evangelism, this grated on me. Surely everyone has a right to hear the gospel, I reasoned. “Yes,” replied a Vietnamese brother, “but our government believes that everyone also has a right not to hear the gospel.” I don’t remember how I responded at the time, but the idea began to grow on me over the years: the right not to hear the
gospel. Interesting. Maybe that explains the violated feeling I get when missionaries at the door are applying some evangelistic formula on me. Maybe that right not to hear explains the sick feeling I get when I see a street evangelist using a megaphone to preach hellfire and brimstone … you know, the “good news.” Or the sicker feeling I get when I happen upon a channel with a slick, big-haired televangelist telling me that if I buy his book, God will bless me. When I think of these things, I say, “Evangelism illegal: I like it!” But here’s the thing: Jesus.The person of Jesus.When I finally work through my self-righteous cynicism toward evangelism, I see Jesus, and I believe once again in the telling of the good news concerning him.This Jesus, whom we can know in faith by the power of the Spirit, is truly good news. And this kind
PRISM 2010
8