PRO 01-05-2012_Layout 1 5/1/2012 12:33 AM Page 1
We’re wrapping our cars around astronomical price hikes Page 02
profit.com.pk
Skewed towards the big daddies g
Small, medium size firms lose interest in heavy weight-friendly stock market KARACHI
A
ISMAIL DILAWAR
t least 36 firms listed at country’s stocks market are facing the front and apex regulators’ action for not paying the annual listing fee and inducting their ordinary shares into the Central Depositary System (CDS). the regulatory action ranges from suspension of trading in the defaulting companies’ shares to their de-listing from the concerned exchange. In recent months, the front regulators from Karachi Stock exchange (KSe) have quite frequently been moving under Listing regulation No. 30(1)(2)(b)(c)(e) and (g) due to increasing defaults by the listed firms, specially the small and medium ones. “Majority of the defaulting companies are of small or medium size which have lost interest in the stocks market which offers little or not incentives to them in terms of present tax and regulatory regime,” said a KSe official, wanting not to be named. the official proposed that for such firms there should be a “small and medium division” wherein they would have facilities like low capital requirement etc. “the present reformed tax and regulatory framework though suits the big companies it offers little help to small and medium firms to carry huge costs,” the official added. Monday saw the KSe issuing warning notices to at least 36 companies for their failure to pay listing fee, join the CDS of Central Depository Company and hold the Annual General Meetings for last two consecutive years. Majority of the defaulting firms are
from the textile sector. the 19 firms put on notice for the nonpayment of listing fee and joining CDS include (Colony) Sarhad textile Mills, Annoor textile Mills, Asim textile Mills, Bela Automotives, Central forest Products, Dadabhoy Construction Industries, Globe textile Mills, Hamid textile Mills, Karim Cotton Mills, Khurshid Spinning Mills, Mehr Dastgir textile Mills, Morafco Industries, redco textiles, S.S.Oil Mill, Saleem Denim Industries, Service fabrics, Service textile Industries, Sind fine textile Mills and taj textile Mills. Some 16 firms facing the regulators’ ire for not paying the listing fee are: (Colony) thal textile Mills, Adil textile Mills, Brothers textile Mills, Dadabhoy Cement Industries, Dadabhoy Sack, Data textiles, elahi Cotton Mills, Genertech Pakistan, Hajra textile Mills, first IBL Modaraba, Kohinoor Industries, Kohinoor Power Mills, Mukhtar textile Mills, Nazir Cotton Mills, Pakistan PVC and Saritow
Spinning Mills. three of the above Adil textile, Dadabhoy Sack and Nazir Cotton are those whose CDS eligibility has been revoked by the CDC. the KSe official said the KSe’s listing fee was nominal ranging from rs 25,000 to rs 1 million for big companies like the OGDC and others. Saleem Sugar Mills is the firm which has got trading in its shares suspended for its failure to hold AGMs for last two consecutive years, pay the annual listing fee since July 1, 1997 and join the CDS. Having had a 90-day deadline, ending on July 30, theses firms are required to rectify the defaults or face the “necessary action” under the relevant regulations. “It is hereby informed to all concerned that the following companies as a consequence of defaults… have been advised to fulfill the requirements of the said regulations,” warned Muhammad Ghufran, deputy general manager companies affairs at KSe.
Tuesday, 01 May, 2012
BOI to sign Pak-US BIT during president’s US visit KARACHI
A
STAFF REPORT
fter a break of at least eight years Pakistan and United States of America would be signing a Bilateral Investment treaty (BIt) during President Asif Ali Zardari’s visit to the United States this year, said Saleem H. Mandviwala, Minister of State & Chairman Board of Investment while talking to Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Industry (KCCI) members here at Aiwan-etijarat on Monday. Pakistan was the first one to sign the bilateral investment treaty with Germany in 1959 and as of today 47 Bilateral Investment treaties had already been signed with different countries, BIt between Pakistan & the United States which dragged for eight years is resumed in 2012 for conclusion. He further said that the purpose of the bilateral investment agreements is to create a binding framework between the contracting states for protection and promotion of investments made in order to gain investor’s confidence. the host state take the responsibility for safety of the investor and their property in its territory under provisions of domestic and international Law. Our Investment Promotion and Protection Act of 1976 give protection to investor and their property in Pakistan. responding to reservations of the business community of Karachi, Saleem H. Mandviwala maintained that input of all stakeholders were taken in formulating BIt & termed it as a positive step taken by the two countries. Negating concerns that the treaty would reduce status of Pakistan, he reassured that (‘after change of BIt language by USA’) there was no negative aspect for
Pakistan anywhere in the treaty & both countries’ interest would be equally protected without any discrimination. He said that matters like ftA; travel advisory etc. could be discussed after signing of the treaty. President KCCI Mian Abrar Ahmad appreciated the stance of Minister of State/Chairman Board of Investment to take the KCCI into confidence being the largest Chamber in Pakistan & the 8th largest in the world. He said that breaking the stalemate that existed for over 5-years is a great achievement in the economic history of two countries. Chairman BMG Siraj Kassam teli emphasized on incorporating all other related matters in the treaty. former President KCCI Majyd Aziz urged to add mediation clauses in the treaty. Chairman Sindh Board of Investment Muhammud Zubair Motiwala insinuated that Pak-USA BIt was a positive step to bring closer both the countries and would also lead to ftA and MfN with US. He appreciated the efforts of Board of Investment to bring the consensus of all the stakeholders on the concerns related to the Pak-US BIt. He assured that the business community is satisfied because the mutual benefits of both the countries were taken into consideration before the final stepping towards the treaty. He also emphasized to discuss the matters of travel advisory, law & order, security issues and perception of Pakistan among the US investors. He also invited the US investors to invest in the coal infrastructure & other mining projects in Pakistan. In his concluding note he informed that the business community of Pakistan welcomed the signing of BIt with US and waiting for the market access to our products in the US through the MfN and ftA.
Commerce ministry has found a way to promote corruption…apparently g
REAP believes Quality Review Committee under MoC would promote corruption, mismanagement g Oh and they also want inspection of QRC accounts KARACHI
S
GHULAM ABBAS
HOwING serious concerns over the fresh decision of Ministry of Commerce to take the control of Quality review Committee (QrC) into its hand the memebrs of rice exporters Association of Pakistan (reAP) have said that the fresh move would promote corruption and mismanagement in the committee besides creating immense problems to them the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) vide a notification bearing number 4(10)/05-e superseded public notice dated March 3,1999 and taken fiscal and other control of the QrC and placed it under the control of Director General (DG) trade Development Authority of Pakistan (tDAP) as its chairman. However on the other hand the small exporters who had concerns about the earleir status of QrC under reAP, have welcomed the move while demanding that the ministry and tDAP should also ensure complete recovery of proceeds and correct transfer of accounts of QrC with inspection fees collected since 1999, correct expenditure figures and tax
liabilities from the reAP before issuing clearance certificate to them. Sources in reAP claimed saidthat the QrC under the ministry would provide oppertunities to the vested intererst group in ministry and tDAP to demand kick backs and bribes for getting the quality certificates. Besides the geniun exporters would also face delays in trade actvities due to the hectic and lenghty documentation and filing system in government offices. It was the reAP which has pushed the country’s exports from $ 400 million to over $ 2 billion since the association was controlling the QrC. Being private organization, the association was strictly monitoring the quality issue of rice for exports. the counter parts of the organization were also praising the role of reAP for maintaining standards and quality of the country’s rice, they claimed. However on the other hand the Union of Small and Medium enterprises (UNISAMe), in a statement has invited the attention of tariq Iqbal Puri, Chief executive Officer (CeO) trade Development Authority of Pakistan (tDAP) to ensure complete recovery of proceeds and correct transfer of accounts of QrC. According to President NISAMe it is very important to reconcile the accounts
of the QrC from 1999 onwards till date and secure the documents of property purchased with QrC funds before relieving the former management and invited the attention of the Auditor General of Pakistan to have the accounts checked. “Basically the collection of inspection fees by a body not qualified to inspect the rice consignments shipped to global destinations nor collect fees in this manner is beyond comprehension and in fact a mockery of the system of inspection, nevertheless due to patronage of the successive governments and the obstinacy of the ministers who were misguided by the big exporters who wanted to control the rice business they let the body exist despite court rulings and strong objections from Pakistan Standard Quality Control Authority (PSQCA)” it said. the Sindh High Court (SHC) had declared that no exporter will be compelled to become member of reAP but despite the order of the SHC no exporter can export rice without being a member of reAP which is truly contempt of court. It is pertinent to note that no body can carry out preshipment inspection (PSI) of cargo without permission from PSQCA who issues the license on the basis of qualification
compliance and the most important point is the fact that pre-shipment inspection (PSI) is always carried out by a third party and never by the parties involved. UNISAMe strongly objects to PSI by QrC and urges the MOC to discontinue the practice of PSI by QrC immediately. the MOC has reconstituted the composition of the QrC and the notification states the composition and scope but it is again based on defective perceptions as the body cannot comprise of anybody who is an exporter himself as it gives rise to conflict of interest. the big exporters get their cargo inspected very easily but the SMe rice exporters have to undergo the ordeal and their shipments are being delayed due to this exercise, the QrC will again play into the hands of the big boys as no SMe representative is on the body. the question is how can the PSQCA allows the QrC to function and how the MOC is promoting the PSI by a body which is unconstitutional in its character and the global buyers are making fun of the system by stating that this is self inspection by the shippers themselves. It said now that the notification has been issued for the transfer of funds to tDAP and onward inspection fees to be collected
by tDAP. It is desired that tDAP should waive the inspection fees,( if it wishes to continue with this so called PSI) as it is already recovering export development surcharge at the rate of quarter percent from every exporter and not offering anything in return. Under such circumstances it simply cannot be given the responsibility of managing the QrC which undertakes PSI of Basmati rice exports. the small and medium sized rice exporters have taken serious exception to PSI conducted by QrC, managed by reap, and have decided to take up the matter with the Ministry of Commerce (MOC), export Promotion Bureau (ePB), trading Corporation of Pakistan (tCP) and Ministry of food, Agriculture and Livestock (Minfal). the Ministry of Commerce, the stament further said, has almost realised the fact that PSI of Basmati rice conducted by QrC was unfair, unjust, and was giving rise to conflict of interest, and has sent a reference to ePB before dissolving the committee managed by reAP. the SMe rice exporters are eagerly awaiting the final action of dissolution of the troublesome committee and have appealed to the policy makers to act fast in the best interests of rice exporters.