F RI DAY, J A N UA RY 31, 2014
Equality doesn’t mean sameness OPINIONS pages 4 & 5
VOLUME 55 NO. 4
TV: Modern escapism
Student snowboarder SPORTS pages 10 & 11
FEATURES pages 6 & 7
CEO goes to CES
The Prospector
CHSPROSPECTOR.ORG
Student Newspaper of Cupertino High School
MICHAEL LI news editor
BRIAN ZHONG sports assistant
In a now highly-publicized case of government surveillance ethics, the National Security Agency (NSA) is at the center of a controversy that demonstrates the difficulty in defining a balance between liberty and security in an increasingly tech-driven world. Reports released in June 2013 by former CIA employee Edward Snowden revealed the agency’s practices of collecting data from citizens’ emails and phone calls,
“
FLIPSIDE page 12
... Focus not on the acquisition of data but on [the usage] -Dharma Naidu, sophomore
spurring widespread disapproval of the Obama Administration’s security measures as well as calls for reformation. On Jan. 17, President Obama addressed the nation regarding the program and put forth a plan to quell fears. His proposal revolves around several key issues, including increased transparency and greater regard for the public’s
civil liberties. For one, third parties will have a say in the secret intelligence court — third parties that will intend to “fight” for the public’s privacy rights and ensure that no law has been violated. Obama, in addition, called for the NSA to allow tech companies to divulge more information about the agency’s surveillance operations. With these recommendations in place, companies such as Apple and Google can reveal more about the number of requests they receive from the NSA and the nature of those requests. Most significantly, Obama requested that the NSA hand over its bulk collection of phone records to a third-party entity, which would lower the chances of illegal government intrusion. Obama’s remarks, however, did not placate those already opposed to the agency’s collection program. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange deemed the 45-minute speech “mere window dressing,” while Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) labelled the reforms “the same unconstitutional program with a new configuration.” While many remain unsatisfied with these attempts to quell surveillance activities, some students
flip side assistant
Indian news channels have been buzzing about the “Indian diplomat situation” for the past three weeks. They all outline the same story: an Indian diplomat traveled to America with an assistant to help her. The assistant eventually ran away, and the U.S justice system brought a criminal lawsuit
The state of surveillance
SURVEILLANCE, CONTINUED ON PAGE 2
Indian diplomat ignites controversy NIKITA DEVDHAR
10100 FINCH AVENUE, CUPERTINO, CA 95014
against the diplomat for not paying the maid proper income, and then let the U.S law take its course with the diplomat, which included a strip-search and handcuffs. Many Indians took great offense to the treatment of the diplomat because they believed it violated unspoken respect between the two countries. Almost every news channel invited officials and important political figures to talk about their stance on the situation and almost everyone holds the same viewpoint — the assistant of the diplomat knew exactly what she was getting into. Unlike Americans, the Indian people believe that when the diplomat travelled to America, both the diplomat and her assistant were bound by Indian wage laws since they were both employees of the Indian government. Therefore, most Indian people believe the maid used the American laws to her advantage by saying that she “wasn’t being paid enough” and was “suppressed,” leading to the arrest of the Indian diplomat. Many Americans, on the other hand, have very different opinions on the situation, believing that when the diplomat and her assistant travelled to the United States, only the diplomat was bound to Indian wage laws, not the assistant. However, if the assistant were to be paid by American wage laws, she would be earning more than the diplomat herself. Therefore, the Americans believed that the maid was not being paid properly, so she had justification for running away. “Because America views everyone equal under the eyes of the law, they thought what she did under the DIPLOMACY, CONTINUED ON PAGE 2
Model UN at Tino KATIE MARTIN editor-in-chief
For the first time since its inception, the school’s United Nations Club has expanded to include Model UN as a subcategory of its program. The community service-oriented group has a long history of involvement in global events via fundraisers and projects, but before this year had never chosen to venture into the committee-style conferences that allow students to further examine these issues in a mock UN session. According to junior and Model UN Chair Amy Ran, garnering interest for Model UN among club members had never been difficult; however, what proved to be a challenge was finding an officer willing to become the leader. Ran ultimately took on the role of president of the newly-founded team, which boasts approximately 20 members in its inaugural year. Model UN functions as similarly as possible to a regular session
THU DAM
MODEL UN, CONTINUED ON PAGE 2