PAWEŁ SAPIECHA ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA Architect - Researcher - Programmer
PROFILE A young and dynamically developing architect with a BSc degree in Architecture, and Urban Design, and Master of Architecture degree completed in 2021. I am interested in innovative, digital technologies such as Machine Learning, Parametric Design or IoT (Internet of Things) in the context of optimization and the acceleration of the design process in architecture and urban planning.
EDUCATION MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Sept 2019 - June 2021 GPA 3.96
During my studies I focused on applications of computational design and robotic fabrication in solving architectural and urban design problems as well as improving current solutions. During my final semester I focused on ways to digitally twin Phoenix’s suburban sprawl areas, and lightweight carbon fiber structures weaved with the robotic arm. MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE
WARSAW UNI. OF TECH. Sept 2017 - July 2018
During my first year of the M.Arch program in Warsaw I started exploring possibilities of parametric design taking part in competitions and workshops. I transferred to UofA after the first year.
BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN
WARSAW UNI. OF TECH. Sept 2013 - July 2017
4 year program with a strong emphasis on engineering. A thesis design of the River Police Station in Warsaw needed a careful design answering multiple functional needs, the unique culture of the River Police unit, and a vulnerable site located on a river bank.
CONTACT email: pawelsapiecha1@gmail.com phone:(520)358-6068 www.linkedin.com/in/psapiecha/ www.pawelsapiecha.com
TECHNICAL SKILLS PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES Java [Processing] C# WEB DEVELOPMENT HTML & CSS Javascript [jQuery] GEO-SPATIAL ANALYTICS ArcGIS Pro 3D & BIM MODELING Rhino & GH Revit & Dynamo AutoCad ArchiCad Unreal Engine [Speckle] GRAPHIC DESIGN & VIDEO EDITING Adobe CC FABRICATION KukaPRC Slicer3D
LANGUAGES English Polish
AWARDS ALBERT H. DRACHMAN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP UofArizona, 2020-2021 CARL RALD SCHOLARSHIP UofArizona, 2020-2021 M.ARCH TECH STREAM AWARD UofArizona, 2021
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
EXPERIENCE BUILDING PERFORMANCE INTERN Oct 2021 - Mar 2022 Olson Kundig
Performed building simulations to support design decisions on projects. Performed energy and solar radiation studies in the early schematic design phase to determine appropriate shading and orientation for projects. Produced daylight and embodied carbon simulations for project teams. Partnered with the Director of Building Performance to develop strategies to achieve net-zero energy and carbon for projects teams. Produceed written summary reports of completed studies to be shared with project teams.
RAPID PROTOTYPING LAB MANAGER Feb 2021 - June 2021 University of Arizona
Researched, prepared, and implemented tools like the KUKA robotic arm, 3D printers, and Arduino electronics to model architectural research models. Trained and worked with over 80-student class members on fabricating architectural prototypes.
TEACHING ASSISTANT Sept 2019 - June 2021 University of Arizona
Led lectures and workshops on the use of parametric techniques in architecture Advised over 210 students over three semesters about digital techniques. Handled class documentation and reorganized materials to teach remotely.
VISITING SCHOLAR April 2019 - Aug 2019 University of Arizona
Conducted a research on „Synthesis of SelfAdaptive Architects using Developmental Genetic Programing” at Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Arizona
INTERN ARCHITECT July 2018, Nov 2018 - March 2019 Kurylowicz & Associates, Warsaw
Developed a multi-industrial conceptual design (bim model building, design of the facade, and selection of materials). Prepared graphic and presentation materials. Supported modeling and technical work.
METHODICAL SKILLS GENERATIVE DESIGN
Data-driven urban and architectural design strategies with incorporation of evolutionary optimization components like Silvereye, Octopus or Wallecei.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Complex analysis of site forces gives and opportunity to design hi-performing sustainable building and cities.
BIM INTEGRATION
Bridging the gap between complex Rhino 3D+GH parametric geometries, and highly organized building information modeling in Revit.
RAPID PROTOTYPING
Performed complex material research as well as applying various fabrication technologies to model certain material or technical qualities within hours.
RECOMMENDATIONS Susannah Dickinson
Associate Professor of Architecture srd@email.arizona.edu
Aletheia Ida
Associate Professor of Architecture aida@email.arizona.edu
Paulus Musters
Laboratory Manager musters@email.arizona.edu
Chris Trumble
Associate Professor of Architecture ctrumble@email.arizona.edu
01
PERSONAL STATEMENT I’m passionate about developing as an architect and I believe that my skills can make the design process more valuable and effective. I look for solutions and inspirations in a variety of disciplines. Technology is today central to the architectural practice. My work goes beyond architecture. My interests are the use of VR, Augmented Reality, Internet of Things, computational techniques, rapid robot prototyping, artificial intelligence and other advanced tools to create more refined and better performing built environment design. Each of my designs puts a great attention on efficiency, reduction of material use, energy consumption and sustainability. With the use of big data I performed a city-wide simulation how my design will work as a part of an urban system. As a Techne class Graduate Teaching Assistant at the University of Arizona I share my experience, knowledge and skills with undergraduate students. Having those unique abilities I am also constantly looking for the possibilities to support traditional architectural research and design. After getting my Master’s degree I am going to continue my career in the United States as a computational designer. I want to work with architects to design Smart Cities, sustainable buildings and better built environment for the world of tomorrow.
PAWELSAPIECHA.COM PAWELSAPIECHA.COM PAWELSAPIECHA.COM
GANADO HIGH SCHOOL
07 >>>
LIQUID
09 >>> 11 >>> 14 >>> 20 >>> 21 >>>
Advanced Design Studio II | Sem II University of Arizona Professor: Laura Carr
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
03 >>>
Design Communication III | Sem I University of Arizona Professor: Susannah Dickinson
RIVER POLICE STATION B.Arch Thesis Warsaw University of Technology Professor: Radoslaw Achramowicz
TUCSON URBAN GONDOLA Advanced Design Studio I | Sem I University of Arizona Professor: Bill Mackey
NATURIA APARTMENTS Internship Kurylowicz & Associates Supervisor: Maria Saloni-Sadowska
R&D WORKS SKILL MAP
02
GANADO HIGH SCHOOL
Food
Ba
nq
e St or ag
tc h Ki
ue tH
al l
Ganado High School is an important place for the local Navajo youth. The main goal of the school is to provide a safe and supportive learning environment for over 500 students. The program of the Celebrations school is focused on Career and Technical Education. Therefore it needs miscellaneous labs and workshops to recreate the real workplaces, where graduates will get the necessary skills. community - school relation
en
Advanced Design Studio II University of Arizona Professor: Laura Carr
Culinary A Program
Healthy Animals
Meat Products
Meat Lab Program
rg er y Su
Ca re
re na D
ir t
A
lo or ll F Ki
si Pr oc es
Market Revenue
ng
an
d
Pa c
ki
Fr ee ze rs
ar ke t M
Arts m
ng
Ill Animals
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
Community
Vet Hospital Revenue Veterinary Program
Ganado High School
3
veterinary school
Visualizing
A variety of industrial a within the same buildin of the requirements of e diagrams in total were security, temperature a each of the three buildi requirements should be with different should be of the building. The les (or greater amplitude o challenging and risky d between spaces within
meat lab
P
G
Condemned Products Room
F S
Electrical /Mechanical culinary school
Holding Cooler
Hot Box (Chill Room)
4
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
Parameters
and educational functions ng requires special awareness each of the space. 9 generated each visualizing and hygiene requirements for ings. Spaces with the similar e placed close and those e placed in the further part ss regular diagram outline of rays length), the more design of the boundaries n a building.
Fabrication + Packaging Freezer Storage Classroom
Holding Cooler Hot Box (Chill Room) Offal
Show+Rest+Lock
Kill Floor Laundry + Storage Holding Pens Lab/ Quality Control Tannery
Electrical/Mech USDA Office
Break Room high
Condemned Products Room
medium Market
low Pit Roast + Gathering
Pit Roast + Gathering
Laundry + Storage
Self-organizing diagram Complex spatial relations and characteristics of industrial workflows, inspired the creation of a tool that uses force vectors to diagram preferable placement of spaces within a building. Based on the previous analysis, the relation between each room was scored from 1 (set far away) to 3 (set close to each other) and organized into a Excel chart that was used as an input for a diagram generator. The size of the circles represent the specified size of the room. The algorithm cannot be directly used as a room plan, however it’s a graphic representation of a complex dataset that makes design decisions more informed and minimize the building’s functional flaws.
Classroom Market
Restroom + Lockers
Fabrication + Freezer Packaging Storage Lab + Quality Control
Office
USDA
Break Room
Kill Floor
)
Tannery VET
Reception File Room
Reception
Holding Pens Offal
File Room Small Animal Exam Small
1 1
Small Animal Exam
Small Animal Surgery
Sterilizati on Room Recovery 2
2
3
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
1
1
1
2
3
3
1
1
2
3
3
1
1
4
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
2
4
1
Sterilizati on Room
2
4
1
1
3
4
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
1
1
3
4
3
3
4
1
Animal Holding
Outdoor Animal Dirt Arena Aren Holding (Indoor) (Outd
1
Animal Surgery
Recovery Large Animal Exam / Outdoor
Large Animal Exam /
1
1
B
A
C
D
E
174' - 2 3 21' - 1 23/32"
22' - 4 1/4"
22' - 4"
22' - 2"
9' - 2"
11.01
9' - 2"
32' - 3 15/16"
9' - 2"
135' - 0 11/32"
CW1
Banquet Hall
2
102
102A 2 11/32"
1
9' - 2"
14.01
UP 9' - 2"
31' - 8 1/16"
9' - 2"
9' - 2"
A201
102B
58' - 4 7/16"
3
5' - 6 1/2"
5' - 2"
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
ARC 541 SPRING 2
INSTRUCTOR
KEYNOTES
E
G
F
H
3.01 3.03 11.01 11.02 11.03 11.04 11.05 14.01
I
TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT
31/32" 22' - 5 3/4"
22' - 3 1/4"
22' - 3"
3 4' - 10 21/32"
19' - 3"
4' - 11 1/4" 4' - 7 3/32"
16' - 8 1/4"
8' - 1 13/32"
104B
155 1
104 11.04
Cooler
1
1
Kitchen
103
1
Freezer
106
106A 11.02
3"
1
7' - 2 7/16"
1"
Boiler Room
107
107A
1
Greenhouse
115 1 154A
168B 1
ø 5' - 0"
ø 5' - 0"
1
2
Lockers W
169
172B
Restroom W 172A
172
169A
1
2 171B
172C 1
154
1
7' - 2 7/16"
168
168A
3.03
Laundry
Storage
CW2
103A
7' - 2 7/16"
11.05
Lockers M
1
170
Restroom M
171
1
171A 170A
1 154A
89' - 3"
8' - 5 1/2"
4' - 3 3/16" 7' - 2 7/16" 2' - 11 1/4"
1
7' - 2 7/16"
105
105A
3.01
155A 7' - 2 7/16"
1
64' - 0"
104A
7' - 2 7/16"
11.03
1
7' - 2 7/16"
Receiving Electr / Mech
2
5
NOT FO
Culinary School
Meat Lab
Optimizing the Roof’s Shape The roofs follow the functional requirements and environmental conditions of the site. Glazing is designed to let the sunlight in during winter and shade it during summer. The optimization of caps decreased sun exposure of the banquet halls 10% and classroom’s in the meat lab by 33%. The BIM model was optimized in Grasshopper and imported to Revit as separate families through the Rhino.Inside.Revit.
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
Veterinary School
15’ - 6”
1
tension cable
ENLARGED BUILDING ELEVATION metal panel
glass panel
glazed panel tension cable
partition wall with acoustic insulation
vent panel
OFFICE CONDITION
IPE 100 supporting bar HVAC package unit
solid panel
16” plenum floor
4” composite metal panell vapor barrier membrane 4” trapezoidal profile sheeting
IPE 200 main structural rib
2
WALL/ROOF SECTION
PROCESS SPACE CONDITION
concrete floor with vinyl coating
concrete pile
6
LIQUID Design Communication III University of Arizona Professor: Susannah Dickinson
The Broad is a contemporary art museum in downtown Los Angeles designed by Diller Scofidio + Renfro. The first part of the study included analysis of the building’s facade geometric rules, modeling the single modules and a 3d model of the whole building’s exterior.
1.
avg.s.e. = 13.212
2.
avg.s.e. = 12.540
3.
avg.s.e. = 11.081
4.
(perforations) avg.s.e. = 11.081
Solar Optimization >>>
<<< North-East Module
<<< South-East Module
<<<South-West Module
<<< North-West Module
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
During the exercise the shape of the building’s front facade was optimized with the use of a genetic evolutionary algorithm, that decreased the sun exposure by 16% in comparison to the original facade. The perforation was adjusted to the radiation map of the facade. The final model - Liquid - is a research project, that combines rapid robot prototyping with modeling thermoplastics. The spikes of the final model follow the curvature of the optimized front facade.
7
Manipulation with material over two tools is an unusual setup and needed multiple geometric transformations to reverse the tool movement and translate it into movement of a robotic arm holding a frame with thermoplastic.
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
Transformation and division
Designing paths for the robot
8
RIVER POLICE STATION B.Arch Thesis Warsaw University of Technology Professor: Radoslaw Achramowicz
A new headquarters of the River Police is located in the heart of the revitalized port district of Warsaw. The idea of the project was a building that was a link between the river and a bank. The building was inspired by its users - enthusiasts of their work and people emotionally connected with the Vistula.
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
The interior of the building is designed to meet the needs of the work of the officers, who form a wellcoordinated team that need large open space, but also need place for individual work that preserves professional secrecy. The office part has sliding soundproofing walls of milk glass, that allow to adjust the space to the current case. In the stone block of the building there are secret rooms, archives, armory and technical rooms.
open space office
3 double offices
single office + open space
2 triple offices
1 double 4 single offices
1 triple 3 single offices
individual offices
9
top floor D' 6171.95
0.00
750.00
750.00
1194.34
K1
375.00
750.00
750.00
750.00
750.00
SW4
750.00
750.00
375.00
375.00
24 criminal dept. o. 28.20 terrazzo
25 city guard o. 57.50 terrazzo
375.00
375.0
26 office 28.20 terrazzo
27 deputy w 28.20 terrazzo
182.00
A'
A 870.50 761.11 + 0.15
367.00
+ 0.14
20 gym 87.00 rubber
1437.49
826.60
SW5
+ 0.14
21 hr office 28.20 terrazzo
K2
23 deputy office 57.50 terrazzo
22 preventive office 57.50 terrazzo 207.50
+ 0.14
19 corridor 108.0 terrazzo
204.50
210.00
05
cloakroom m. pcv
8.56
07
sauna wood
5.32
2.55
bathroom pcv
08
16.15
social room pcv
293.49
B
+ 0.11
11 archive 16.88 concrete secret office pcv
04
11.53
+ 0.5
cloakroom pcv
13 stairs 16.98 pcv
8.46
hvac concrete
7.35
+ 0.11
bathroom pcv
02
+ 0.11
12
11.36
wc pcv
01
362.49
03
5.28
10 armory 6.50 pcv
06
SZ2
13x19 26
546.99
9 utility room 5.00 pcv
SW3
+ 0.11
13x19 26
146.37
338.54
SZ1
44.91
183.67
418.00
295.49
390.16
750.00 87.00
250.59
550.58
181.63
750.00
172.89
224.13 750.00
750.00
289.00
573.11 750.00
50.00
120.00
750.00
6171.84 D
a-a’-b-b’-c-c’section D1
D1
+ 4.07
+ 3.85 20.00
20.00 27.50
327.50
298.00
SP1
75.00
334.00 277.00
SP3
SP2 + 0.14
+ 0.15
± 0.00
+ 0.11 30.00
26.00
50.00
50.00
498.00
494.00 418.00
750.00
SP5 750.00
345.00 - 4.83
240.00
418.00
405.00
750.00
345.00
405.00
42.00
42.00
6275.00 SP5 750.00
345.00
405.00
345.00
750.00 SZ10
405.00
- 4.83
750.00
345.00
405.00
345.00
42.00
42.00
85.00
- 4.83
29 hangar 93.50 concrete
31 hangar 93.50 concrete
30 hangar 93.50 concrete D1
+ 4.30 + 3.91
+ 3.85
A
87.05 50.00
50.00
30.00
27.00
547.00 300.00
276.00
± 0.00
298.00
hvac 27.45 concrete
+ 0.14
+ 0.11 30.00
27.00
30.00 50.00
SP2
468.00
0.00
750.00 750.00 468.00
SZ8
750.00 750.00
750.00 750.00
418.00
1194.34
K1
375.00
750.00
SP5
- 4.83 42.00
1 - flashing 2 - flashing support 3 - fixing the curtain wall frame 4 - Pilkington Planar curtain wall frame 5 - cantilever beam, T-section h = SW9 6cm SW8 6 - post, IPE I-section h = 8cm 7 - plastic cover 8 - bracket, IPE 37 I-section h = 10cm 38 9 - fixing the glass razor to the steel structure D' 10 - fixing the glass razor to the 6171.95 curtain wall 6275.00 750.00 750.00 Pilkington Planar 11 - Pilkington 750.00 Planar curtain wall 375.00 11b - retractable gutter 12 - Sarnafil Sarnaclad metal profile fastened to the formwork with nails 182.00 13 - Sarnafil sealing tape (heatsealed) 14 - glass blade reinforcing the
- 4.87 42.00
42.00
SW4
A'
A 870.50 761.11
SW5 + 0.15
+ 0.14
826.60
20.00
A'
+ 0.14
corridor 81.46 pcv
8.00
conf. prop. st. 10.43 concrete
server room 14.43 concrete
367.00
34 repair s 53.47 concre
761.55
curtain wall structure s = 1cm 15 - IPE pole h = 30cm 16 - IPE deck h = 20cm 17 - insulation from extruded polystyrene 8cm 18 - steel bracket h = 6cm, attached to210.00 the girder plate anchored48in the reinforced concrete ceiling 19 - ventilator 20292.00 - flashing 39 40 21 - ventilation duct pipe fi = 20 22 - roller handle for hangar gates 23 - roll of hangar gates 24 - tightening element 750.00 750.00 750.00 750.00 25 - roller rail for hangar gates 375.00 375.00 of the 375 27 - horizontal insulation extruded polystyrene foundation s = 15cm h = 100cm 28 - concrete blocks 29 - roller rubbing hangar gates 30 - rail of the roller rubbing hangar gates 13x19 26
d-d’ section 1431.60
33 garage 53.47 concrete
32 hangar 53.87 concrete
761.00
stairs 16.98 pcv
B
13x19 26
55.00
front wall details
5.00 10.00
20.00
D1
SZ10
750.00
00
750.00
375.00
375.00
40.00
22.00
852.60
8.008.00 13.60 7.50
13
29
2.00
28
5.50
17
12
20.00
7.25
30.00
867.60 761.11
923.28
+ 0.14
10.00
M20
M16
7 8
M16
14
1437.50
12.50
50.00
31
16
C
207.41
15.50
6.00
6 5 M16
20.00
29 conference room 82.90 terrazzo
8.00
4
10.00
27 28 accounting o. 28.20 terrazzo
1 2 3
M16
11
28
warden
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
5.00 2.00 12.00
2.00 8.008.00
0
75.00 11
9
C'
4.00
19.00
40.00
8.00 18
9.37
17
16
15
dyzurka pcv
11.93
6,94
546.99
magazyn beton utw.
8.00
362.49
14
30.00 312.85
0
391.06
386.08
206.00
351.90 750.00
750.00
40.00
0
64.00 3.20
SP2 SP2
43.09
30.00
64.o0
M16
11
8.00 6.00
4
119.05
4 3
20.00
30.00
19 25.00
298.00
12.50
+ 0.14
31.00
+ 0.13
75.00
19.00
468.00
468.00
SP6 750.00
750.00
345.00
405.00
- 4.83
8.00
200.00
SG5
345.00
242.50
112.50
SZ10
85.00
42.00
42.00
K1
10 64.00
13.00
3.20
35 mechanical shop 53.47 concrete - 4.83
SP5 - 10cm hardened concrete screed waterproofing - bituminous roofing felt x2 42cm foundation slab - 4.83
social room pcv
electrical rm. 10.00 concrete
4.10
42
cloakroom pcv
SZ10 - 10cm precast concrete lined 45 43 44 41 with river pebbles 5cm air gap 20cm mineral wool 20cm silicate blocks 2cm air gap 750.00 5cm precast 750.00 concrete slabs 5.00 river pebbles 375.00 (gate) 375.00 = 8cm extruded polystyrene (gate) 8cm frame structure of the gate 2cm air gap 13cm aerated concrete r 7.82
13.00
36 paint shop 53.66 concrete
31 - compacted sand
wc 5.30 pcv
+ 0.11
± 0.00
22
8.00
shop ete
20
11
9
405.00
+ 3.91
25
23
30.00
6.00 21 8.00
21
SPZ4
SP2
14
30.00
00
11 18
+ 3.70 20.00
8
M16
12.50
+ 4.30
15.50
7
298.00
4
4.00 6.00
D1
6 5 M16
40.00
9
M30 1 2 3
3.20
24.00
15 8.008.00 13.60 7.50 17
K1
10
sw6
9.18
B'
11.56
15.00
niebieski pokój pcv
toaleta pcv
magazyn z. krym. pcv
15
12.00 2.00 5.00
2.00 8.008.00
5.00 2.00 12.00
20.00
10.00 5.00
20.00
5.00 10.00
761.00
K1 - double glazed curtain wall Pilkinton Planar 547.00
SP2 - 464cm terrazzo 47 6 cm concrete screed 20 cm monolithic reinforced concrete ceiling 5.70
750.00 750.00
utility rm. concrete
SZ10 2.00 10.00
29
30
5.50
28
7.25
batt. charge. 6.90 concrete
30.00
28
27
8.00 200.00
852.60
31
923.28
+ 0.14
8.008.00
D1 - Sika Sarnafil membrane 2cm formwork 20 cm mineral wool 1431.60 0-20 cm extruded polystyrene 10cm corrugated sheet
water con. rm. 10.00 concrete
- 4.83
2.00
867.60 761.11
SP5
15.00
10
TUCSON URBAN GONDOLA Advanced Design Studio I University of Arizona Professor: Bill Mackey
< RACQUET CLUB STATION kindergarden office retail restaurant fast food bank restaurant retail office sports center restaurant fast food park school park
3 pub
sports center school playground retail park
2 bank park doctor clinic
< UNIVERSITY STATION
sports center playground park
p p s p p c p r
CAMPBELL STATION >
Raquet Club site analysis
4
CATALINA FOOTHILLS STATION >
The gondola concept is an answer for the three main urban design problems in Tucson; the orthogonal system hinders the free exploration of the city, low visibility range, and homogeneous development disturbs the spatial orientation, the center is poorly connected with Catalina Foothills, making this picturesque district practically inaccessible to pedestrians. The gondola, which moves diagonally over the orthogonal grid, allows residents to rise above the suburbs, provides a different perspective on the city’s structure, and allows them to commute between the center, Foothills, and local mountain parks.
commercial fast food retail bank restaurant school
1
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO Catalina Foothills site analysis
A multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm was used to analyze thousands of possible routes and find the most accessible one. Route length and average distance from the stations to local focal points (shops, restaurants, schools etc.) designated as the objectives. In the local scale the same algorithm used the topology of the streets to designate the most accessible site for the gondola station.
park park school playground park commercial playground restaurant
n
mo
school commercial commercial restaurant
4.
.
Mt
m Le
s
ll
i th
o
Fo
3.
ub
t
Cl
ue
office office school park fast food retail retail bank
2. 1. A gondola + tram route
q Ra
e
iv
Un
n
ai
t un
Mo
ty
i rs
11
3.1 Foothills Station A public transportation hub needs a flawless circulation design to handle the flow of the passengers. Generative design was used to improve the layout of the building so the paths between the communication core and each of the main spaces are the shortest possible. Two additional criteria were the location of the library on the north side and the close placement of the sport spaces. The algorithm generated over 30,000 plans and marked the best solutions.
lockers
bowling
drop-Off zone
multi-fn studio
bus stop
gym
library
cafe concert hall
Program Definition >>>
communication core + gondola station platform
station gondola
communication core (fixed)
3D model of every building’s space
(fixed)
drop-off(1)
bus(1)
3 2 1
library(N)
bowling
Analyzing Pareto frontier solutions, creating graphic representation of data, manual adjustment of the most preferable model
squash courts
<<< Performance Criteria
Location of the fixed elements, defining which elements needs to stay on the ground level, multi-fn studio specifying the evaluation criteria gym(c) (communication, north library squash(c) placement, sport rooms close to lockers(c) together), modeling the local code lobby requirements, setbacks, max height cafe concert hall
Result Analysis >>>
lobby
12
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
+3 floor
front wall details open to below
gym +2
squash
+2 floor
library
concert
lobby
gym +1
gondola station
N 10ft 10ft
4 - auto-shading thermal bimetallic pieces mounted on steel-framed modular panels
skate park
playground
bowling
2aluminium cladding 4’ mineral fiber insulation gypsum board shearing, exterior rated with joints taped/sealed steel studs gypsum board
+1 floor
cafe
lockers
34’ gravel bed 4’ insulation XPS sealing, bitumen, two-ply 10’ steel reinforced concrete terrace
1antistatic laminate/PVC tiles G.I. stringer pedestal 4’ insulation XPS sealing, bitumen, two-ply 10’ steel reinforced concrete 4’ insulation XPS drop ceiling tiles
5ft
studio
13
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
NATURIA APARTMENTS Internship Kurylowicz & Associates Supervisor: Maria Saloni-Sadowska
The Naturia residential complex in Toruń consists of 13 low-rise residential buildings. When designing the layout of the buildings, the priority was to preserve as many trees as possible and maintain the forest character of this place. solar shading radiation simulations
No shading - 3.963 kWh
Simple shading - 2.922 kWh 1S
1R
Complex shading - 2.901 kWh
1P
1O
1N
1M
1L
1K
1J
E1.05 attyka +15.92 m
E1.05
51 301
122
22 65
230
265
87
370
80
267
310
80
230 80
230
310
310 230
230
310
310
80
80
230
274 22 14
80
80
22 14
80
103
22 14 274 22 14
310 310
22 14 310
80
1693
274
2.96
14
3.10
44 22
6.06
230
E1.01
+3.10 m
265
265 6.20
230
E1.02
+6.20 m
274
22 14 9.16
80
9.30
22 14
E1.03
+9.30 m
274
4 40 36 230
350
80 230
12.40
-4.26
-4.26
-4.53 -4.58
230
310
310 11.5 25 73
-1.30
-1.00
-1.30
260
248.5 60 6.5 15.5
-4.21
-0.75 -1.00
260
25 73
-3.61
5 61
-3.60
-4.21
40
-3.60 m
11.5
360 245
E1.U1
312.5
-1.12
68.93 m.n.p.W
232
232
274
-0.02 -0.36 -0.48
248.5
73.60 m.n.p.W
-0.14 -0.36
15.5
100
126
10
0.00
35
+0.00 m
11.5 22 14
E1.00
230
310
2.30
40
ZAKRES PROJEKTU BUDOWLANEGO - OBSZAR DO ZATWIERDZENIA
22
230
E1.04
+12.40 m
274
122
15.27
22 65
15.92
+15.41 m
70.00 m.n.p.W -4.42 -4.47
-1.00
-1.30
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO UWAGA:
1H
1G
1F
1E
1E
1D
1C
1B
Wszystkie prawa autorskie dotyczące tego rysunku są własnością Kuryłowicz & Associates Sp. z o.o. Niniejszy rysunek jest wydany pod warunkiem iż nie będzie kopiowany, ani udostępniany bez uzgodnienia z K&A Sp. z o.o. Nie nalezy odmierzać wymiarów z rysunku, ani używac go jako szablonu. Niniejsza dokumentacja stanowi część opracowania wielobranżowego. Dokumentację wielobranżową należy rozpatrywać jako całość. Powierzchnia użytkowa mieszkań uwzględnia tynki wewnętrzne gr 1,5cm. Wymiary i wysokości pomieszczeń nie uwzględniają tynków wewnętrznych, odnoszą się do ścian surowych.
1A
E1.05 attyka +15.92 m
Projekt
E1.05
ZESPÓŁ ZABUDOWY MIESZKANIOWEJ
+15.41 m
E1.04 attyka
W REJONIE UL.GRASERA W TORUNIU DZ. EW. 173/1(część), odręb 30, JED. EW. 046301_1
+13.00 m
22 74
103
274
267
E1.04
12.90
+12.40 m
L
B
+9.30 m
9.14
A
80
22 14
9.16
14 22
103 267
Schemat
E1.03
80
9.30
22 74
13.00 12.26
274 296
13.00
Inwestor
230
E1.02
GRANICA ZESPOŁU BUDYNKÓW ABL
274
Eco9 SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ 02-797 Warszawa, ul. Klimczaka 1
+6.20 m
6.04
1422
80
6.06
80
6.20
2214
230
274 310
8.83
-3.61
230 2.30
246.5
Brama garażowa 600 cm x 260 cm
E1.00
8 -3.60
10%
-3.35
15%
-2.92
10%
Generalny Projektant: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o. 02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Biuro Projektowe Branżowe: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o.
02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Nr upr. Podpis
PROJEKTANT
PROF. DR HAB. ARCH. EWA KURYŁOWICZ
WA-164/90
ZESPÓŁ PROJEKTOWY ARCH. MARIA SALONI-SADOWSKA
MA/KK/001/02
ARCH. ALEKSANDRA KURZĄTKOWSKA ARCH. WIKTOR GRUSZCZYŃSKI ARCH. KAROLINA MIKLASZEWSKA ARCH. WOJCIECH SZOPIŃSKI ARCH. KATARZYNA FLASIŃSKA-RUBIK ARCH. VLADYSLAV MARCHENKO ARCH. MARCIN SZUBSKI
-0.05
SPRAWDZAJĄCY
Odwodnienie liniowe rampy 20 cm x 20 cm x 600 cm
Odwodnienie liniowe rampy 20 cm x20 cm x 600 cm
312.5 -3.60
2.57
273
11.5 22 14
-0.44
360
-1.36
224.5
-1.24
2.96
+0.00 m
249.5
-1.30
-1.00
-0.36
+3.10 m
248.5
-1.00
-0.48
-0.14
98
99.5
100
0.00
15.5
235
227
274 310
339.5
E1.01
80
1422
2.96
80
3.10
17.5 22 14
230
274
274 310
5.73
260
1I
-2.67
-1.93
5%
-1.68
71.92 m.n.p.W
ARCH. PIOTR KUCZYŃSKI
Faza projektu
St-398/89
PB
15%
Branża
ARCHITEKTURA
E1.U1 -3.60 m
Tytuł rysunku
68.84 m.n.p.W
PRZEKRÓJ 1 PRZEZ BUDYNKI A i L
poziom wody gruntowej Numer rysunku
1803-PB-A-ABL-3-01 Skala 1 : 100
Data 2018.10.31
14
Rysował WS
Building Performance Analysis Computer simulations can be a valuable tool for architects. In the case of the Naturia estate in Torun, PL, the simulations helped to optimize the design of the courtyard between the buildings, as well as to design better apartment layouts, which brought profits for both the investor and the residents. Presented simulations were generated with Ladybug Tools in Rhino/Grasshopper. Top of the page: wind flow diagram
A
A
15 12.8 10.7 8.6 6.4 4.3 2.1 0
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
L
L
B
CFD analysis - wind speed diagram (m/s)
24 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0
B
shadow study (hours of sunlight, June 21)
95 85 76 66 57 47 38 28 19 9 0
annual daylighting study (% of time with sufficient natural light exposure)
A series of simulations were carried out to illustrate the different wind circulation patterns in the square between buildings during different seasons (November - February simulation on diagrams). Shadow studies helped to understand how buildings will self-shade. Thanks to the annual daylighting analysis design team could take more conscious design decisions to improve the comfort of the future users.
15
HP
(105.03 MW13)
dz.nr 173/1
3
2
IVA
4
5
IV
LE.
POM. TE TECH.
+
HP +
IV 6
Ś 1
HP
HP
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
HP
LEGENDA granice działki nr.ewid. 173/1 1,2,3,4 zakres projektu budowlanego - obszar do zatwierdzenia
nieprzekraczalna linia zabudowy wg MPZP
(105.03 MW13) oznaczenie terenu wg MPZP
HP obrysy parterów nadwieszenia nad parterem antresole kondygnacje podziemne
III
ilość kondygnacji
F
oznaczenie budynków
Ś HP
śmietniki hydrant pożarowy zewnętrzny wjazd do garażu i na teren inwestycji wejścia do klatek drzewa do adaptacji 90 - kolejny nr inwentaryzacji drzewo do adaptacji warunkowej po wyznaczeniu poziomu terenu; 90 - kolejny nr inwentaryzacji drzewa wnioskowane do wycinki 251 - kolejny nr inwentaryzacji
SIECI I PRZYŁĄCZA WG ODRĘBNEGO OPRACOWANIA proj. przyłacze kanalizacji sanitarnej proj. przyłacze kanalizacji deszczowej
HP
proj. podłączenie wpustów projektowany wpust deszczowy proj. przyłącze wodociągowe proj. przyłącze sieci cieplnej proponowana lokalizacja złącz kablowych Kabel zasilający wg opracowania ENERGA Kabel oświetleniowy nn-0,4kV projektowana latarnia wys. 250 cm projektowany słupek oświetleniowy wys. 80 cm
1:500
2018.10.31 AK
16 .
1.02
1.03
1.04
2187 110
180
110
180
110
277
35
180
B22-OP-01 110x230
435.5
B22-OP-01 110x230
148
675 110
B22-OP-01 110x230
725 B22-OP-01 110x230
31
1E
374
8
244
A.01.M.03.04 POKÓJ 10.57 m²
8
80x200
80x200
12
356
626
A.01.M.0 GARDER 1.06
80x200
A.01.M.03.06 A.01.M.03.07 HOL 80x200 7.43 m² ŁAZIENKA 4.87 m²
112 8
12
80x200
90x200 BO
202
132 10x17.22x26
310
310
90x200 BO
A.01.M.02.05 HOL 8.67 m²
45
556
292
362
382
183
12
200
90x200
491
124
80x200 A.01.M.02.06 ŁAZIENKA 4.52 m²
A.01.K.01 KLATKA SCHODOWA
12
90x200 BO
12
286.5
32
90x200 BO
164
3.10
80x200
A.01.M.05.01 SALON Z ANEKSEM 18.46 m²
12
8x17.22x26 90x200 BO
24 320.5
8
110
725
288
160
110
288
160
110
336.5 12
155
675 2187
1.02
1.03
A.01.M. SALO 19.64
A.01.M.01.03 KUCHNIA 7.02 m²
411 24
80x200
8
80x200
244
171
A.01.M.01.06 HOL 4.62 m²
1.04
260.5 B22-OP-01 110x230
300
12
A.01.M.01.05 POKÓJ 10.81 m²
B22-OP-01 110x230
194 31
A.01.M.06.05 POKÓJ 12.24 m²
B22-OP-01 110x230
494
174
411
A.01.M.06.06 POKÓJ 10.45 m²
B22-OP-02 300x231
45 148
150
A.01.M.06.04 LOGGIA 6.81 m²
24
12
349 A.01.M.06.01 SALON 16.51 m²
174
178
102 12
288
288
8
411
110
B22-OP-01 110x230
29
90x200 BO
102
551
A.01.M.01.07 80x200 ŁAZIENKA 4.54 m²
B22-OP-01 110x230
134 8
A.01.M.06.08 ŁAZIENKA 4.54 m²
12
8
80x200
95
8
8
80x200
A.01.M.06.02 WC 1.67 m² 80x200
HOL 8.51 m²
385
125
94
A.01.M.06.07 80x200
31
1B
186
12
A.01.M.06.03 KUCHNIA 7.68 m²
178.5
735
A.01.M.06 - M3k POW. 61.61 m² POW. D. 6.81 m²
187 12
80x200
B22-OP-01 110x230
80
186
204
385
8
110
125.5
1C
24
19
285
304
148
174
A.01.M.04.07 80x200 ŁAZIENKA 4.14 m²
187
12 62
2137
A.01.M.05.02 LOGGIA 4.50 m²
B22-OP-03 285x230
24
8
386
124
A.01.M.05.04 80x200 HOL 10 4.25 m²
690
125.5
A.01.M.05.03 POKÓJ 11.28 m²
174
A.01.M.05.05 ŁAZIENKA 4.47 m²
296
B22-OP-01 110x230
12
12
A SALO
A.01.M.04.06 HOL 7.37 m²
24 388
110
364
A.01.M.04.02 PRALNIA 1.20 m²
309
124 80x200
A.01.M.04.01 SALON Z ANEKSEM 24.69 m²
8
A.01.M.03.05 POKÓJ 8.86 m²
80x200
8 B22-OP-01 110x230
112 8
110
486
195
A.01.M.05 - M2a 38.46 m² POW. 4.50 m² POW. D.
A.01.M.04.04 POKÓJ 10.49 m²
A.01.M.04.05 POKÓJ 8.94 m²
113 1D
288
626
681
8
374
244
124 8
8
B22-OP-03 285x230
125.5
A.01.M.04 - M3a POW. 56.83 m² 4.95 m² POW. D.
338
374
368
45
374
148
A.01.M.04.03 LOGGIA 4.95 m²
110
128.5
UWAGA:
1.06
725
31 148
31
475.5
343
45
1E
148
Projekt
ZESPÓŁ ZABUDOWY MIESZKANIOWEJ
368
B22-OP-03 285x230
650
370
A.01.M.03.03 LOGGIA 4.92 m²
L
B22-OP-01 110x230
256
235
24
B
1D
383
274
110 110 96.5
8
02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Nr upr. Podpis
PROJEKTANT
148
ARCH. MARIA SALONI-SADOWSKA ARCH. WIKTOR GRUSZCZYŃSKI ARCH. KAROLINA MIKLASZEWSKA
735
A.01.M.01 - M2k POW. 49.91 m² POW. D. 6.45 m²
240.5
372.5
110
ARCH. WOJCIECH SZOPIŃSKI ARCH. KATARZYNA FLASIŃSKA-RUBIK ARCH. VLADYSLAV MARCHENKO ARCH. MARCIN SZUBSKI
SPRAWDZAJĄCY ARCH. PIOTR KUCZYŃSKI
Faza projektu
St-398/89
45
PB
Branża
ARCHITEKTURA 31
148
A.01.M.01.04 LOGGIA 6.59 m² 178.5
148
B22-OP-02 300x231
MA/KK/001/02
ARCH. ALEKSANDRA KURZĄTKOWSKA
112 B22-OP-01 110x230
300
WA-164/90
ZESPÓŁ PROJEKTOWY
534.5
.01.01 ON 4 m²
02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Biuro Projektowe Branżowe: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o.
PROF. DR HAB. ARCH. EWA KURYŁOWICZ
24
45
1C
274
B22-OP-03 285x230
Generalny Projektant: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o.
A.01.M.02 - M2k POW. 51.34 m² POW. D. 4.01 m²
A.01.M.02.03 LOGGIA 4.01 m²
332
Eco9 SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ 02-797 Warszawa, ul. Klimczaka 1
111 B22-OP-01 110x230
A.01.M.02.02 KUCHNIA 8.17 m²
A.01.M.02.01 SALON 19.68 m²
Inwestor
690
383 228.5
8 80x200
A
B22-OP-01 110x230
12
A.01.M.02.04 80x200 POKÓJ 10.30 m²
2137
8
W REJONIE UL.GRASERA W TORUNIU DZ. EW. 173/1(część), odręb 30, JED. EW. 046301_1 Schemat
112
499
03.02 ROBA m²
A.01.M.03 - M3a 57.88 m² POW. 4.92 m² POW. D.
110
A.01.M.03.01 ON Z ANEKSEM 25.09 m²
Wszystkie prawa autorskie dotyczące tego rysunku są własnością Kuryłowicz & Associates Sp. z o.o. Niniejszy rysunek jest wydany pod warunkiem iż nie będzie kopiowany, ani udostępniany bez uzgodnienia z K&A Sp. z o.o. Nie nalezy odmierzać wymiarów z rysunku, ani używac go jako szablonu. Niniejsza dokumentacja stanowi część opracowania wielobranżowego. Dokumentację wielobranżową należy rozpatrywać jako całość. Powierzchnia użytkowa mieszkań uwzględnia tynki wewnętrzne gr 1,5cm. Wymiary i wysokości pomieszczeń nie uwzględniają tynków wewnętrznych, odnoszą się do ścian surowych.
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
ABL-3-01
1B
Tytuł rysunku
BUDYNEK A, RZUT PIĘTRA +1, +2, +3
478.5 725
31
ABL-3-01
Numer rysunku
1803-PB-A-A-2-01 1.06
Skala 1 : 100
Data 2018.10.31
Rysował KM
17
1.02
1.03
1.04
1F
2187 675 248
817
-0.04
186
62 8 124 12 163
12
12
124
A.00.M.02.07 80x200 ŁAZIENKA 4.52 m²
8
80x200
90x200 BO
8
556 286
124 8
80x200
8 80x200
316
10%
24
A.00.M.03.05 POKÓJ 11.39 m²
160
110
160
110
15% 144
494.5
110
B22-OP-01 110x230
171 725
B22-OP-01 110x230
404
B22-OP-01 110x230
90 31
B22-OP-04 404x230
31
367
261 A.00.M.03.06 POKÓJ 9.39 m²
367
80x200
8
15%
12
40.5
186
8 124 261
A.00.M.03.07 POKÓJ 9.39 m²
A.00.M.03.01 SALON 23.23 m²
A.00.M.02.01 SALON 23.88 m²
A.00.M.03.09 ŁAZIENKA 5.57 m²
12
12
A.00.M.03.10 ŁAZIENKA 3.01 m²
A.00.M.03.08 HOL 15.99 m²
8 8
367
498
80x200
80x200
365
204
8 201
80x200
80x200
159
125
8
8
B22-OP-01 110x230
499
A.00.M.02.06 80x200 HOL 8.04 m²
90x200 BO
24
24 204
504
328.5
491
292
362
300 127.5 110
A.00.M.03.02 GARDEROBA 3.45 m²
A.00.M.03.03 KUCHNIA 9.20 m²
110
735
232.5
275.5 298.5 B10M
0.00
10x17.22x26
616
12 A.00.M.04.01 SALON Z ANEKSEM 23.75 m²
43
B22-OP-01 110x230
675
668
725
2187 ABL-4-04 (EL PD)
1.03
1.04
5%
1.02
500
1B
A.00.M.01.06 ŁAZIENKA 3.00 m²
A.00.M.02.02 SZAFA 1.33 m²
8x17.22x26
A.00.M.03 - M4k POW. 90.62 m² 109.64 POW. D. m²
80x200
8 80x200
95 12
90x200 BO
164
296
80x200 12
90x200 BO
690 2137
B22-OP-02 300x231
1C
363
sufit podwieszony h=235cm
1174
A.00.M.04.04 HOL 4.31 m²
A.00.M.01.05 HOL 5.70 m²
A.00.M.01.02 PRALNIA 2.09 m²
80x200A.00.M.05.09 ŁAZIENKA 4.14 m²
A.00.K.01 KLATKA SCHODOWA
8
8
80x200
90x200 BO
124
174
C21-GLN-01
8
186.5
24 112
24
195 110
12
24 68
114 8
A.00.M.04.05 ŁAZIENKA 4.47 m²
12
A.00.M.04.03 POKÓJ 11.28 m²
127.5
0.00
313
80x200
8 34 8
112
246
110
116
388
478
367
A.00.M.01.04 POKÓJ 8.98 m²
A.00.M.05.06 POKÓJ 10.49 m² 80x200
124 8
80x200
B22-OP-01 110x230
336
A.00.M.05.02 A.00.M.05.03 A.00.M.05.08 GARDEROBA PRALNIA HOL 1.23 m² 1.21 m² 8.79 m²
8 80x200
8
8
A.00.M.05.04 KUCHNIA 8.77 m²
288
A.00.M.05.07 POKÓJ 8.94 m²
650 125.5
364
8
201x284.5
244
A.00.M.05.01 SALON 18.01 m²
80x200
372
300
8
374
488
B22-OP-01 110x230
A.00.M.04 - M2a 43.81 m² POW. 34.50 m² POW. D.
725
138.5
68
B22-OP-01 110x230
110
B25-DK-01
B22-OP-02 300x231
1D
180
374
A.00.M.05 - M3k POW. 61.58 m² POW. D. 34.05 m²
110
B22-OP-01 110x230
1E
31
583.5
80x200
725 B22-OP-01 110x230
31
ABL
1.06 1F
ABL-3-01
31
B10M B21-OPC-02
354
300
1E
A.00.M.01 - M2a POW. 41.11 m² POW. D. 22.24 m²
112
650
620.5
A.00.M.01.01 SALON Z ANEKSEM 21.34 m²
B22-OP-01 110x230
274
227
1D
B22-OP-01 110x230
110
43 8
383
B22-OP-01 110x230
Projekt
ZESPÓŁ ZABUDOWY MIESZKANIOWEJ
103.5
A.00.M.02.03 KUCHNIA 8.17 m²
228.5
690
110
12
110
A.00.M.02.05 POKÓJ 10.30 m²
2136.5
383
B21-OPC-02
24
110
354
A.00.M.02 - M2k POW. 56.24 m² POW. D. 31.03 m²
Schemat
1C
278
332
B22-OP-05 278x230
W REJONIE UL.GRASERA W TORUNIU DZ. EW. 173/1(część), odręb 30, JED. EW. 046301_1
L
B
-2.92
735
A
608.5
Inwestor
Eco9 SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ 02-797 Warszawa, ul. Klimczaka 1
-2.67
31
Generalny Projektant: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o.
8
1B
60
25
L-3-01
B22-OP-02 300x231
Wg opisu konstrukcji Okładzina - plytki klinkierowe lub tynk cienkowarstwowy Drzwi wejsciowe Okladzina klatek schodowych - Lustro
B25-DK-01 C21-GLN-01
30.5
67.5
25
Wszystkie prawa autorskie dotyczące tego rysunku są własnością Kuryłowicz & Associates Sp. z o.o. Niniejszy rysunek jest wydany pod warunkiem iż nie będzie kopiowany, ani udostępniany bez uzgodnienia z K&A Sp. z o.o. Nie nalezy odmierzać wymiarów z rysunku, ani używac go jako szablonu. Niniejsza dokumentacja stanowi część opracowania wielobranżowego. Dokumentację wielobranżową należy rozpatrywać jako całość. Powierzchnia użytkowa mieszkań uwzględnia tynki wewnętrzne gr 1,5cm. Wymiary i wysokości pomieszczeń nie uwzględniają tynków wewnętrznych, odnoszą się do ścian surowych.
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
UWAGA:
02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Biuro Projektowe Branżowe: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o.
02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Nr upr. Podpis
PROJEKTANT
31
PROF. DR HAB. ARCH. EWA KURYŁOWICZ
WA-164/90
ZESPÓŁ PROJEKTOWY ARCH. MARIA SALONI-SADOWSKA
-1.93
MA/KK/001/02
ARCH. ALEKSANDRA KURZĄTKOWSKA ARCH. WIKTOR GRUSZCZYŃSKI ARCH. KAROLINA MIKLASZEWSKA ARCH. WOJCIECH SZOPIŃSKI ARCH. KATARZYNA FLASIŃSKA-RUBIK
1.06
ARCH. VLADYSLAV MARCHENKO ARCH. MARCIN SZUBSKI
Odwodnienie liniowe rampy 20 cm x 20 cm x 600 cm
SPRAWDZAJĄCY ARCH. PIOTR KUCZYŃSKI
Faza projektu
St-398/89
PB -1.68
Branża
ARCHITEKTURA Tytuł rysunku
BUDYNEK A, RZUT PARTERU
Numer rysunku
1803-PB-A-A-2-00 Skala 1 : 100
Data 2018.10.31
Rysował KM
18
PRZEKR
PRZEKRÓJ A-A
RZUT
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO K
I J
A
RÓJ B-B
E
M
L
D
B C
BUDLEX JAR SP. Z O. O. Z SIEDZIBĄ W TORUNIU ul. Lubicka 54, 87-100 Toruń Generalny Projektant:
1803-PW-A_IJK-5-10 1 : 10
17/07/2019
JM
19
R&D WORKS
20
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO
SKILL MAP
Re se a
Obs erv ati on Shop Drawings Pinterest
h rc
Handsketchi ng
Presentations for Clients
Archdaily
IN THE OFFICE
Budget Analysis
Graphic Design
Programming
Pre Co Do
Parking Design Zoning Review
lan eP Sit ry a n mi eli Pr
Scheduling
Infrastructu
Facades
Finishes, Fixtures
3D Massing Analyzing Local Laws
Ceilings Interiors
Choice of Doors/Windows
Consultants Coordination
Fire Safety Requirements Virtual/Augum ente r Re alit y 3D
Unity Unreal Engine
Octane
Lumion
Blender Microstation3D
SketchUp AutoCAD 3D
V-Ray
Microsoft
Cinema 4D
Adobe Photoshop Microsoft Word
Microsoft Excel
Grasshopper LadyBug Rhino 3D ETABS
Revit Architecture Google Earth
AutoCAD 2D
NES Specification Software
Specle Revit MEP
C#
Processing Python
Dynamo
ElumTools Dialux AGi132 Canutesoft - FHC
ASTA Power Project Amtech
ArchiCAD
Space Allowances Primavera P6
Revit Structure ArcGis
ion sit ui q Ac
Adobe Illustrator
Google Earth Studio
Navisworks
ta
SolidWorks
Microstation 2D
M BI
Google Street View
Java RunwayML
Coordin ation
NBS Create
Kuka PRC
n utatio Comp tric/ ame Par
Arduino
Adobe InDesign
Vector Graphics
Da
Documentation
Slicer
Adobe Premiere
Microsoft Outlook
AREA OF OP
Catia
3DS Max
SOFTWARE
Mo de lin g
n tio ica br Fa
Ra st er Gr ap hi cs
Keyshot Adobe After Effects
Outline Specs
g erin nd Re
Designing
PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO Pictures
Consultation
Pra ct ice
ing Permit Build
reparing onstruction ocuments
Recording
Inspection
Open Workshops Supervision
Te ch nic a l Dr aw i
Community Meeting
Site Visit
ng
Lectures
Collecting Data in Terrain
ncy upa Occ stPo
ure Design
OUTSIDE THE OFFICE
Debates Associations Architectural Critique Exhibitions
PERATION
Architectural Education
De si g
Theory
ng ni Painting
Color Sampling
Fabrication
g kin Ma
Model Making
Detail Desing Material Selection
Mixing ingridients Routing 3D Printing
Testing Strength
Testing Various Finishes
MATERIALS Testing Radiance
Testing Durability
Testing Radiance
Testing
21