Pawel Sapiecha Portfolio

Page 1

PAWEŁ SAPIECHA ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA Architect - Researcher - Programmer

PROFILE A young and dynamically developing architect with a BSc degree in Architecture, and Urban Design, and Master of Architecture degree completed in 2021. I am interested in innovative, digital technologies such as Machine Learning, Parametric Design or IoT (Internet of Things) in the context of optimization and the acceleration of the design process in architecture and urban planning.

EDUCATION MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Sept 2019 - June 2021 GPA 3.96

During my studies I focused on applications of computational design and robotic fabrication in solving architectural and urban design problems as well as improving current solutions. During my final semester I focused on ways to digitally twin Phoenix’s suburban sprawl areas, and lightweight carbon fiber structures weaved with the robotic arm. MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE

WARSAW UNI. OF TECH. Sept 2017 - July 2018

During my first year of the M.Arch program in Warsaw I started exploring possibilities of parametric design taking part in competitions and workshops. I transferred to UofA after the first year.

BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN

WARSAW UNI. OF TECH. Sept 2013 - July 2017

4 year program with a strong emphasis on engineering. A thesis design of the River Police Station in Warsaw needed a careful design answering multiple functional needs, the unique culture of the River Police unit, and a vulnerable site located on a river bank.

CONTACT email: pawelsapiecha1@gmail.com phone:(520)358-6068 www.linkedin.com/in/psapiecha/ www.pawelsapiecha.com

TECHNICAL SKILLS PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES Java [Processing] C# WEB DEVELOPMENT HTML & CSS Javascript [jQuery] GEO-SPATIAL ANALYTICS ArcGIS Pro 3D & BIM MODELING Rhino & GH Revit & Dynamo AutoCad ArchiCad Unreal Engine [Speckle] GRAPHIC DESIGN & VIDEO EDITING Adobe CC FABRICATION KukaPRC Slicer3D

LANGUAGES English Polish

AWARDS ALBERT H. DRACHMAN MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP UofArizona, 2020-2021 CARL RALD SCHOLARSHIP UofArizona, 2020-2021 M.ARCH TECH STREAM AWARD UofArizona, 2021


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

EXPERIENCE BUILDING PERFORMANCE INTERN Oct 2021 - Mar 2022 Olson Kundig

Performed building simulations to support design decisions on projects. Performed energy and solar radiation studies in the early schematic design phase to determine appropriate shading and orientation for projects. Produced daylight and embodied carbon simulations for project teams. Partnered with the Director of Building Performance to develop strategies to achieve net-zero energy and carbon for projects teams. Produceed written summary reports of completed studies to be shared with project teams.

RAPID PROTOTYPING LAB MANAGER Feb 2021 - June 2021 University of Arizona

Researched, prepared, and implemented tools like the KUKA robotic arm, 3D printers, and Arduino electronics to model architectural research models. Trained and worked with over 80-student class members on fabricating architectural prototypes.

TEACHING ASSISTANT Sept 2019 - June 2021 University of Arizona

Led lectures and workshops on the use of parametric techniques in architecture Advised over 210 students over three semesters about digital techniques. Handled class documentation and reorganized materials to teach remotely.

VISITING SCHOLAR April 2019 - Aug 2019 University of Arizona

Conducted a research on „Synthesis of SelfAdaptive Architects using Developmental Genetic Programing” at Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Arizona

INTERN ARCHITECT July 2018, Nov 2018 - March 2019 Kurylowicz & Associates, Warsaw

Developed a multi-industrial conceptual design (bim model building, design of the facade, and selection of materials). Prepared graphic and presentation materials. Supported modeling and technical work.

METHODICAL SKILLS GENERATIVE DESIGN

Data-driven urban and architectural design strategies with incorporation of evolutionary optimization components like Silvereye, Octopus or Wallecei.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Complex analysis of site forces gives and opportunity to design hi-performing sustainable building and cities.

BIM INTEGRATION

Bridging the gap between complex Rhino 3D+GH parametric geometries, and highly organized building information modeling in Revit.

RAPID PROTOTYPING

Performed complex material research as well as applying various fabrication technologies to model certain material or technical qualities within hours.

RECOMMENDATIONS Susannah Dickinson

Associate Professor of Architecture srd@email.arizona.edu

Aletheia Ida

Associate Professor of Architecture aida@email.arizona.edu

Paulus Musters

Laboratory Manager musters@email.arizona.edu

Chris Trumble

Associate Professor of Architecture ctrumble@email.arizona.edu

01


PERSONAL STATEMENT I’m passionate about developing as an architect and I believe that my skills can make the design process more valuable and effective. I look for solutions and inspirations in a variety of disciplines. Technology is today central to the architectural practice. My work goes beyond architecture. My interests are the use of VR, Augmented Reality, Internet of Things, computational techniques, rapid robot prototyping, artificial intelligence and other advanced tools to create more refined and better performing built environment design. Each of my designs puts a great attention on efficiency, reduction of material use, energy consumption and sustainability. With the use of big data I performed a city-wide simulation how my design will work as a part of an urban system. As a Techne class Graduate Teaching Assistant at the University of Arizona I share my experience, knowledge and skills with undergraduate students. Having those unique abilities I am also constantly looking for the possibilities to support traditional architectural research and design. After getting my Master’s degree I am going to continue my career in the United States as a computational designer. I want to work with architects to design Smart Cities, sustainable buildings and better built environment for the world of tomorrow.

PAWELSAPIECHA.COM PAWELSAPIECHA.COM PAWELSAPIECHA.COM


GANADO HIGH SCHOOL

07 >>>

LIQUID

09 >>> 11 >>> 14 >>> 20 >>> 21 >>>

Advanced Design Studio II | Sem II University of Arizona Professor: Laura Carr

PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

03 >>>

Design Communication III | Sem I University of Arizona Professor: Susannah Dickinson

RIVER POLICE STATION B.Arch Thesis Warsaw University of Technology Professor: Radoslaw Achramowicz

TUCSON URBAN GONDOLA Advanced Design Studio I | Sem I University of Arizona Professor: Bill Mackey

NATURIA APARTMENTS Internship Kurylowicz & Associates Supervisor: Maria Saloni-Sadowska

R&D WORKS SKILL MAP

02


GANADO HIGH SCHOOL

Food

Ba

nq

e St or ag

tc h Ki

ue tH

al l

Ganado High School is an important place for the local Navajo youth. The main goal of the school is to provide a safe and supportive learning environment for over 500 students. The program of the Celebrations school is focused on Career and Technical Education. Therefore it needs miscellaneous labs and workshops to recreate the real workplaces, where graduates will get the necessary skills. community - school relation

en

Advanced Design Studio II University of Arizona Professor: Laura Carr

Culinary A Program


Healthy Animals

Meat Products

Meat Lab Program

rg er y Su

Ca re

re na D

ir t

A

lo or ll F Ki

si Pr oc es

Market Revenue

ng

an

d

Pa c

ki

Fr ee ze rs

ar ke t M

Arts m

ng

Ill Animals

PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

Community

Vet Hospital Revenue Veterinary Program

Ganado High School

3


veterinary school

Visualizing

A variety of industrial a within the same buildin of the requirements of e diagrams in total were security, temperature a each of the three buildi requirements should be with different should be of the building. The les (or greater amplitude o challenging and risky d between spaces within

meat lab

P

G

Condemned Products Room

F S

Electrical /Mechanical culinary school

Holding Cooler

Hot Box (Chill Room)

4


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

Parameters

and educational functions ng requires special awareness each of the space. 9 generated each visualizing and hygiene requirements for ings. Spaces with the similar e placed close and those e placed in the further part ss regular diagram outline of rays length), the more design of the boundaries n a building.

Fabrication + Packaging Freezer Storage Classroom

Holding Cooler Hot Box (Chill Room) Offal

Show+Rest+Lock

Kill Floor Laundry + Storage Holding Pens Lab/ Quality Control Tannery

Electrical/Mech USDA Office

Break Room high

Condemned Products Room

medium Market

low Pit Roast + Gathering

Pit Roast + Gathering

Laundry + Storage

Self-organizing diagram Complex spatial relations and characteristics of industrial workflows, inspired the creation of a tool that uses force vectors to diagram preferable placement of spaces within a building. Based on the previous analysis, the relation between each room was scored from 1 (set far away) to 3 (set close to each other) and organized into a Excel chart that was used as an input for a diagram generator. The size of the circles represent the specified size of the room. The algorithm cannot be directly used as a room plan, however it’s a graphic representation of a complex dataset that makes design decisions more informed and minimize the building’s functional flaws.

Classroom Market

Restroom + Lockers

Fabrication + Freezer Packaging Storage Lab + Quality Control

Office

USDA

Break Room

Kill Floor

)

Tannery VET

Reception File Room

Reception

Holding Pens Offal

File Room Small Animal Exam Small

1 1

Small Animal Exam

Small Animal Surgery

Sterilizati on Room Recovery 2

2

3

1

3

3

3

4

4

4

3

4

4

1

1

1

2

3

3

1

1

2

3

3

1

1

4

3

1

1

2

1

1

1

3

2

4

1

Sterilizati on Room

2

4

1

1

3

4

1

1

1

1

3

2

2

1

1

3

4

3

3

4

1

Animal Holding

Outdoor Animal Dirt Arena Aren Holding (Indoor) (Outd

1

Animal Surgery

Recovery Large Animal Exam / Outdoor

Large Animal Exam /

1

1


B

A

C

D

E

174' - 2 3 21' - 1 23/32"

22' - 4 1/4"

22' - 4"

22' - 2"

9' - 2"

11.01

9' - 2"

32' - 3 15/16"

9' - 2"

135' - 0 11/32"

CW1

Banquet Hall

2

102

102A 2 11/32"

1

9' - 2"

14.01

UP 9' - 2"

31' - 8 1/16"

9' - 2"

9' - 2"

A201

102B

58' - 4 7/16"

3

5' - 6 1/2"

5' - 2"


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

ARC 541 SPRING 2

INSTRUCTOR

KEYNOTES

E

G

F

H

3.01 3.03 11.01 11.02 11.03 11.04 11.05 14.01

I

TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT TEXT

31/32" 22' - 5 3/4"

22' - 3 1/4"

22' - 3"

3 4' - 10 21/32"

19' - 3"

4' - 11 1/4" 4' - 7 3/32"

16' - 8 1/4"

8' - 1 13/32"

104B

155 1

104 11.04

Cooler

1

1

Kitchen

103

1

Freezer

106

106A 11.02

3"

1

7' - 2 7/16"

1"

Boiler Room

107

107A

1

Greenhouse

115 1 154A

168B 1

ø 5' - 0"

ø 5' - 0"

1

2

Lockers W

169

172B

Restroom W 172A

172

169A

1

2 171B

172C 1

154

1

7' - 2 7/16"

168

168A

3.03

Laundry

Storage

CW2

103A

7' - 2 7/16"

11.05

Lockers M

1

170

Restroom M

171

1

171A 170A

1 154A

89' - 3"

8' - 5 1/2"

4' - 3 3/16" 7' - 2 7/16" 2' - 11 1/4"

1

7' - 2 7/16"

105

105A

3.01

155A 7' - 2 7/16"

1

64' - 0"

104A

7' - 2 7/16"

11.03

1

7' - 2 7/16"

Receiving Electr / Mech

2

5

NOT FO


Culinary School

Meat Lab

Optimizing the Roof’s Shape The roofs follow the functional requirements and environmental conditions of the site. Glazing is designed to let the sunlight in during winter and shade it during summer. The optimization of caps decreased sun exposure of the banquet halls 10% and classroom’s in the meat lab by 33%. The BIM model was optimized in Grasshopper and imported to Revit as separate families through the Rhino.Inside.Revit.


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

Veterinary School

15’ - 6”

1

tension cable

ENLARGED BUILDING ELEVATION metal panel

glass panel

glazed panel tension cable

partition wall with acoustic insulation

vent panel

OFFICE CONDITION

IPE 100 supporting bar HVAC package unit

solid panel

16” plenum floor

4” composite metal panell vapor barrier membrane 4” trapezoidal profile sheeting

IPE 200 main structural rib

2

WALL/ROOF SECTION

PROCESS SPACE CONDITION

concrete floor with vinyl coating

concrete pile

6


LIQUID Design Communication III University of Arizona Professor: Susannah Dickinson

The Broad is a contemporary art museum in downtown Los Angeles designed by Diller Scofidio + Renfro. The first part of the study included analysis of the building’s facade geometric rules, modeling the single modules and a 3d model of the whole building’s exterior.

1.

avg.s.e. = 13.212

2.

avg.s.e. = 12.540

3.

avg.s.e. = 11.081

4.

(perforations) avg.s.e. = 11.081

Solar Optimization >>>

<<< North-East Module

<<< South-East Module

<<<South-West Module

<<< North-West Module


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

During the exercise the shape of the building’s front facade was optimized with the use of a genetic evolutionary algorithm, that decreased the sun exposure by 16% in comparison to the original facade. The perforation was adjusted to the radiation map of the facade. The final model - Liquid - is a research project, that combines rapid robot prototyping with modeling thermoplastics. The spikes of the final model follow the curvature of the optimized front facade.

7


Manipulation with material over two tools is an unusual setup and needed multiple geometric transformations to reverse the tool movement and translate it into movement of a robotic arm holding a frame with thermoplastic.


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

Transformation and division

Designing paths for the robot

8


RIVER POLICE STATION B.Arch Thesis Warsaw University of Technology Professor: Radoslaw Achramowicz

A new headquarters of the River Police is located in the heart of the revitalized port district of Warsaw. The idea of the project was a building that was a link between the river and a bank. The building was inspired by its users - enthusiasts of their work and people emotionally connected with the Vistula.


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

The interior of the building is designed to meet the needs of the work of the officers, who form a wellcoordinated team that need large open space, but also need place for individual work that preserves professional secrecy. The office part has sliding soundproofing walls of milk glass, that allow to adjust the space to the current case. In the stone block of the building there are secret rooms, archives, armory and technical rooms.

open space office

3 double offices

single office + open space

2 triple offices

1 double 4 single offices

1 triple 3 single offices

individual offices

9


top floor D' 6171.95

0.00

750.00

750.00

1194.34

K1

375.00

750.00

750.00

750.00

750.00

SW4

750.00

750.00

375.00

375.00

24 criminal dept. o. 28.20 terrazzo

25 city guard o. 57.50 terrazzo

375.00

375.0

26 office 28.20 terrazzo

27 deputy w 28.20 terrazzo

182.00

A'

A 870.50 761.11 + 0.15

367.00

+ 0.14

20 gym 87.00 rubber

1437.49

826.60

SW5

+ 0.14

21 hr office 28.20 terrazzo

K2

23 deputy office 57.50 terrazzo

22 preventive office 57.50 terrazzo 207.50

+ 0.14

19 corridor 108.0 terrazzo

204.50

210.00

05

cloakroom m. pcv

8.56

07

sauna wood

5.32

2.55

bathroom pcv

08

16.15

social room pcv

293.49

B

+ 0.11

11 archive 16.88 concrete secret office pcv

04

11.53

+ 0.5

cloakroom pcv

13 stairs 16.98 pcv

8.46

hvac concrete

7.35

+ 0.11

bathroom pcv

02

+ 0.11

12

11.36

wc pcv

01

362.49

03

5.28

10 armory 6.50 pcv

06

SZ2

13x19 26

546.99

9 utility room 5.00 pcv

SW3

+ 0.11

13x19 26

146.37

338.54

SZ1

44.91

183.67

418.00

295.49

390.16

750.00 87.00

250.59

550.58

181.63

750.00

172.89

224.13 750.00

750.00

289.00

573.11 750.00

50.00

120.00

750.00

6171.84 D

a-a’-b-b’-c-c’section D1

D1

+ 4.07

+ 3.85 20.00

20.00 27.50

327.50

298.00

SP1

75.00

334.00 277.00

SP3

SP2 + 0.14

+ 0.15

± 0.00

+ 0.11 30.00

26.00

50.00

50.00

498.00

494.00 418.00

750.00

SP5 750.00

345.00 - 4.83

240.00

418.00

405.00

750.00

345.00

405.00

42.00

42.00

6275.00 SP5 750.00

345.00

405.00

345.00

750.00 SZ10

405.00

- 4.83

750.00

345.00

405.00

345.00

42.00

42.00

85.00

- 4.83

29 hangar 93.50 concrete

31 hangar 93.50 concrete

30 hangar 93.50 concrete D1

+ 4.30 + 3.91

+ 3.85

A

87.05 50.00

50.00

30.00

27.00

547.00 300.00

276.00

± 0.00

298.00

hvac 27.45 concrete

+ 0.14

+ 0.11 30.00

27.00

30.00 50.00

SP2

468.00

0.00

750.00 750.00 468.00

SZ8

750.00 750.00

750.00 750.00

418.00

1194.34

K1

375.00

750.00

SP5

- 4.83 42.00

1 - flashing 2 - flashing support 3 - fixing the curtain wall frame 4 - Pilkington Planar curtain wall frame 5 - cantilever beam, T-section h = SW9 6cm SW8 6 - post, IPE I-section h = 8cm 7 - plastic cover 8 - bracket, IPE 37 I-section h = 10cm 38 9 - fixing the glass razor to the steel structure D' 10 - fixing the glass razor to the 6171.95 curtain wall 6275.00 750.00 750.00 Pilkington Planar 11 - Pilkington 750.00 Planar curtain wall 375.00 11b - retractable gutter 12 - Sarnafil Sarnaclad metal profile fastened to the formwork with nails 182.00 13 - Sarnafil sealing tape (heatsealed) 14 - glass blade reinforcing the

- 4.87 42.00

42.00

SW4

A'

A 870.50 761.11

SW5 + 0.15

+ 0.14

826.60

20.00

A'

+ 0.14

corridor 81.46 pcv

8.00

conf. prop. st. 10.43 concrete

server room 14.43 concrete

367.00

34 repair s 53.47 concre

761.55

curtain wall structure s = 1cm 15 - IPE pole h = 30cm 16 - IPE deck h = 20cm 17 - insulation from extruded polystyrene 8cm 18 - steel bracket h = 6cm, attached to210.00 the girder plate anchored48in the reinforced concrete ceiling 19 - ventilator 20292.00 - flashing 39 40 21 - ventilation duct pipe fi = 20 22 - roller handle for hangar gates 23 - roll of hangar gates 24 - tightening element 750.00 750.00 750.00 750.00 25 - roller rail for hangar gates 375.00 375.00 of the 375 27 - horizontal insulation extruded polystyrene foundation s = 15cm h = 100cm 28 - concrete blocks 29 - roller rubbing hangar gates 30 - rail of the roller rubbing hangar gates 13x19 26

d-d’ section 1431.60

33 garage 53.47 concrete

32 hangar 53.87 concrete

761.00

stairs 16.98 pcv

B

13x19 26

55.00


front wall details

5.00 10.00

20.00

D1

SZ10

750.00

00

750.00

375.00

375.00

40.00

22.00

852.60

8.008.00 13.60 7.50

13

29

2.00

28

5.50

17

12

20.00

7.25

30.00

867.60 761.11

923.28

+ 0.14

10.00

M20

M16

7 8

M16

14

1437.50

12.50

50.00

31

16

C

207.41

15.50

6.00

6 5 M16

20.00

29 conference room 82.90 terrazzo

8.00

4

10.00

27 28 accounting o. 28.20 terrazzo

1 2 3

M16

11

28

warden

PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

5.00 2.00 12.00

2.00 8.008.00

0

75.00 11

9

C'

4.00

19.00

40.00

8.00 18

9.37

17

16

15

dyzurka pcv

11.93

6,94

546.99

magazyn beton utw.

8.00

362.49

14

30.00 312.85

0

391.06

386.08

206.00

351.90 750.00

750.00

40.00

0

64.00 3.20

SP2 SP2

43.09

30.00

64.o0

M16

11

8.00 6.00

4

119.05

4 3

20.00

30.00

19 25.00

298.00

12.50

+ 0.14

31.00

+ 0.13

75.00

19.00

468.00

468.00

SP6 750.00

750.00

345.00

405.00

- 4.83

8.00

200.00

SG5

345.00

242.50

112.50

SZ10

85.00

42.00

42.00

K1

10 64.00

13.00

3.20

35 mechanical shop 53.47 concrete - 4.83

SP5 - 10cm hardened concrete screed waterproofing - bituminous roofing felt x2 42cm foundation slab - 4.83

social room pcv

electrical rm. 10.00 concrete

4.10

42

cloakroom pcv

SZ10 - 10cm precast concrete lined 45 43 44 41 with river pebbles 5cm air gap 20cm mineral wool 20cm silicate blocks 2cm air gap 750.00 5cm precast 750.00 concrete slabs 5.00 river pebbles 375.00 (gate) 375.00 = 8cm extruded polystyrene (gate) 8cm frame structure of the gate 2cm air gap 13cm aerated concrete r 7.82

13.00

36 paint shop 53.66 concrete

31 - compacted sand

wc 5.30 pcv

+ 0.11

± 0.00

22

8.00

shop ete

20

11

9

405.00

+ 3.91

25

23

30.00

6.00 21 8.00

21

SPZ4

SP2

14

30.00

00

11 18

+ 3.70 20.00

8

M16

12.50

+ 4.30

15.50

7

298.00

4

4.00 6.00

D1

6 5 M16

40.00

9

M30 1 2 3

3.20

24.00

15 8.008.00 13.60 7.50 17

K1

10

sw6

9.18

B'

11.56

15.00

niebieski pokój pcv

toaleta pcv

magazyn z. krym. pcv

15

12.00 2.00 5.00

2.00 8.008.00

5.00 2.00 12.00

20.00

10.00 5.00

20.00

5.00 10.00

761.00

K1 - double glazed curtain wall Pilkinton Planar 547.00

SP2 - 464cm terrazzo 47 6 cm concrete screed 20 cm monolithic reinforced concrete ceiling 5.70

750.00 750.00

utility rm. concrete

SZ10 2.00 10.00

29

30

5.50

28

7.25

batt. charge. 6.90 concrete

30.00

28

27

8.00 200.00

852.60

31

923.28

+ 0.14

8.008.00

D1 - Sika Sarnafil membrane 2cm formwork 20 cm mineral wool 1431.60 0-20 cm extruded polystyrene 10cm corrugated sheet

water con. rm. 10.00 concrete

- 4.83

2.00

867.60 761.11

SP5

15.00

10


TUCSON URBAN GONDOLA Advanced Design Studio I University of Arizona Professor: Bill Mackey

< RACQUET CLUB STATION kindergarden office retail restaurant fast food bank restaurant retail office sports center restaurant fast food park school park

3 pub

sports center school playground retail park

2 bank park doctor clinic

< UNIVERSITY STATION

sports center playground park

p p s p p c p r

CAMPBELL STATION >

Raquet Club site analysis

4

CATALINA FOOTHILLS STATION >

The gondola concept is an answer for the three main urban design problems in Tucson; the orthogonal system hinders the free exploration of the city, low visibility range, and homogeneous development disturbs the spatial orientation, the center is poorly connected with Catalina Foothills, making this picturesque district practically inaccessible to pedestrians. The gondola, which moves diagonally over the orthogonal grid, allows residents to rise above the suburbs, provides a different perspective on the city’s structure, and allows them to commute between the center, Foothills, and local mountain parks.

commercial fast food retail bank restaurant school

1


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO Catalina Foothills site analysis

A multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm was used to analyze thousands of possible routes and find the most accessible one. Route length and average distance from the stations to local focal points (shops, restaurants, schools etc.) designated as the objectives. In the local scale the same algorithm used the topology of the streets to designate the most accessible site for the gondola station.

park park school playground park commercial playground restaurant

n

mo

school commercial commercial restaurant

4.

.

Mt

m Le

s

ll

i th

o

Fo

3.

ub

t

Cl

ue

office office school park fast food retail retail bank

2. 1. A gondola + tram route

q Ra

e

iv

Un

n

ai

t un

Mo

ty

i rs

11


3.1 Foothills Station A public transportation hub needs a flawless circulation design to handle the flow of the passengers. Generative design was used to improve the layout of the building so the paths between the communication core and each of the main spaces are the shortest possible. Two additional criteria were the location of the library on the north side and the close placement of the sport spaces. The algorithm generated over 30,000 plans and marked the best solutions.

lockers

bowling

drop-Off zone

multi-fn studio

bus stop

gym

library

cafe concert hall

Program Definition >>>

communication core + gondola station platform

station gondola

communication core (fixed)

3D model of every building’s space

(fixed)

drop-off(1)

bus(1)

3 2 1

library(N)

bowling

Analyzing Pareto frontier solutions, creating graphic representation of data, manual adjustment of the most preferable model

squash courts

<<< Performance Criteria

Location of the fixed elements, defining which elements needs to stay on the ground level, multi-fn studio specifying the evaluation criteria gym(c) (communication, north library squash(c) placement, sport rooms close to lockers(c) together), modeling the local code lobby requirements, setbacks, max height cafe concert hall

Result Analysis >>>

lobby


12

PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO


+3 floor

front wall details open to below

gym +2

squash

+2 floor

library

concert

lobby

gym +1

gondola station

N 10ft 10ft

4 - auto-shading thermal bimetallic pieces mounted on steel-framed modular panels

skate park

playground

bowling

2aluminium cladding 4’ mineral fiber insulation gypsum board shearing, exterior rated with joints taped/sealed steel studs gypsum board

+1 floor

cafe

lockers

34’ gravel bed 4’ insulation XPS sealing, bitumen, two-ply 10’ steel reinforced concrete terrace

1antistatic laminate/PVC tiles G.I. stringer pedestal 4’ insulation XPS sealing, bitumen, two-ply 10’ steel reinforced concrete 4’ insulation XPS drop ceiling tiles

5ft

studio


13

PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO


NATURIA APARTMENTS Internship Kurylowicz & Associates Supervisor: Maria Saloni-Sadowska

The Naturia residential complex in Toruń consists of 13 low-rise residential buildings. When designing the layout of the buildings, the priority was to preserve as many trees as possible and maintain the forest character of this place. solar shading radiation simulations

No shading - 3.963 kWh

Simple shading - 2.922 kWh 1S

1R

Complex shading - 2.901 kWh

1P

1O

1N

1M

1L

1K

1J

E1.05 attyka +15.92 m

E1.05

51 301

122

22 65

230

265

87

370

80

267

310

80

230 80

230

310

310 230

230

310

310

80

80

230

274 22 14

80

80

22 14

80

103

22 14 274 22 14

310 310

22 14 310

80

1693

274

2.96

14

3.10

44 22

6.06

230

E1.01

+3.10 m

265

265 6.20

230

E1.02

+6.20 m

274

22 14 9.16

80

9.30

22 14

E1.03

+9.30 m

274

4 40 36 230

350

80 230

12.40

-4.26

-4.26

-4.53 -4.58

230

310

310 11.5 25 73

-1.30

-1.00

-1.30

260

248.5 60 6.5 15.5

-4.21

-0.75 -1.00

260

25 73

-3.61

5 61

-3.60

-4.21

40

-3.60 m

11.5

360 245

E1.U1

312.5

-1.12

68.93 m.n.p.W

232

232

274

-0.02 -0.36 -0.48

248.5

73.60 m.n.p.W

-0.14 -0.36

15.5

100

126

10

0.00

35

+0.00 m

11.5 22 14

E1.00

230

310

2.30

40

ZAKRES PROJEKTU BUDOWLANEGO - OBSZAR DO ZATWIERDZENIA

22

230

E1.04

+12.40 m

274

122

15.27

22 65

15.92

+15.41 m

70.00 m.n.p.W -4.42 -4.47

-1.00

-1.30


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO UWAGA:

1H

1G

1F

1E

1E

1D

1C

1B

Wszystkie prawa autorskie dotyczące tego rysunku są własnością Kuryłowicz & Associates Sp. z o.o. Niniejszy rysunek jest wydany pod warunkiem iż nie będzie kopiowany, ani udostępniany bez uzgodnienia z K&A Sp. z o.o. Nie nalezy odmierzać wymiarów z rysunku, ani używac go jako szablonu. Niniejsza dokumentacja stanowi część opracowania wielobranżowego. Dokumentację wielobranżową należy rozpatrywać jako całość. Powierzchnia użytkowa mieszkań uwzględnia tynki wewnętrzne gr 1,5cm. Wymiary i wysokości pomieszczeń nie uwzględniają tynków wewnętrznych, odnoszą się do ścian surowych.

1A

E1.05 attyka +15.92 m

Projekt

E1.05

ZESPÓŁ ZABUDOWY MIESZKANIOWEJ

+15.41 m

E1.04 attyka

W REJONIE UL.GRASERA W TORUNIU DZ. EW. 173/1(część), odręb 30, JED. EW. 046301_1

+13.00 m

22 74

103

274

267

E1.04

12.90

+12.40 m

L

B

+9.30 m

9.14

A

80

22 14

9.16

14 22

103 267

Schemat

E1.03

80

9.30

22 74

13.00 12.26

274 296

13.00

Inwestor

230

E1.02

GRANICA ZESPOŁU BUDYNKÓW ABL

274

Eco9 SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ 02-797 Warszawa, ul. Klimczaka 1

+6.20 m

6.04

1422

80

6.06

80

6.20

2214

230

274 310

8.83

-3.61

230 2.30

246.5

Brama garażowa 600 cm x 260 cm

E1.00

8 -3.60

10%

-3.35

15%

-2.92

10%

Generalny Projektant: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o. 02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Biuro Projektowe Branżowe: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o.

02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Nr upr. Podpis

PROJEKTANT

PROF. DR HAB. ARCH. EWA KURYŁOWICZ

WA-164/90

ZESPÓŁ PROJEKTOWY ARCH. MARIA SALONI-SADOWSKA

MA/KK/001/02

ARCH. ALEKSANDRA KURZĄTKOWSKA ARCH. WIKTOR GRUSZCZYŃSKI ARCH. KAROLINA MIKLASZEWSKA ARCH. WOJCIECH SZOPIŃSKI ARCH. KATARZYNA FLASIŃSKA-RUBIK ARCH. VLADYSLAV MARCHENKO ARCH. MARCIN SZUBSKI

-0.05

SPRAWDZAJĄCY

Odwodnienie liniowe rampy 20 cm x 20 cm x 600 cm

Odwodnienie liniowe rampy 20 cm x20 cm x 600 cm

312.5 -3.60

2.57

273

11.5 22 14

-0.44

360

-1.36

224.5

-1.24

2.96

+0.00 m

249.5

-1.30

-1.00

-0.36

+3.10 m

248.5

-1.00

-0.48

-0.14

98

99.5

100

0.00

15.5

235

227

274 310

339.5

E1.01

80

1422

2.96

80

3.10

17.5 22 14

230

274

274 310

5.73

260

1I

-2.67

-1.93

5%

-1.68

71.92 m.n.p.W

ARCH. PIOTR KUCZYŃSKI

Faza projektu

St-398/89

PB

15%

Branża

ARCHITEKTURA

E1.U1 -3.60 m

Tytuł rysunku

68.84 m.n.p.W

PRZEKRÓJ 1 PRZEZ BUDYNKI A i L

poziom wody gruntowej Numer rysunku

1803-PB-A-ABL-3-01 Skala 1 : 100

Data 2018.10.31

14

Rysował WS


Building Performance Analysis Computer simulations can be a valuable tool for architects. In the case of the Naturia estate in Torun, PL, the simulations helped to optimize the design of the courtyard between the buildings, as well as to design better apartment layouts, which brought profits for both the investor and the residents. Presented simulations were generated with Ladybug Tools in Rhino/Grasshopper. Top of the page: wind flow diagram


A

A

15 12.8 10.7 8.6 6.4 4.3 2.1 0

PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

L

L

B

CFD analysis - wind speed diagram (m/s)

24 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0

B

shadow study (hours of sunlight, June 21)

95 85 76 66 57 47 38 28 19 9 0

annual daylighting study (% of time with sufficient natural light exposure)

A series of simulations were carried out to illustrate the different wind circulation patterns in the square between buildings during different seasons (November - February simulation on diagrams). Shadow studies helped to understand how buildings will self-shade. Thanks to the annual daylighting analysis design team could take more conscious design decisions to improve the comfort of the future users.

15


HP

(105.03 MW13)

dz.nr 173/1

3

2

IVA

4

5

IV

LE.

POM. TE TECH.

+

HP +

IV 6

Ś 1

HP

HP


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

HP

LEGENDA granice działki nr.ewid. 173/1 1,2,3,4 zakres projektu budowlanego - obszar do zatwierdzenia

nieprzekraczalna linia zabudowy wg MPZP

(105.03 MW13) oznaczenie terenu wg MPZP

HP obrysy parterów nadwieszenia nad parterem antresole kondygnacje podziemne

III

ilość kondygnacji

F

oznaczenie budynków

Ś HP

śmietniki hydrant pożarowy zewnętrzny wjazd do garażu i na teren inwestycji wejścia do klatek drzewa do adaptacji 90 - kolejny nr inwentaryzacji drzewo do adaptacji warunkowej po wyznaczeniu poziomu terenu; 90 - kolejny nr inwentaryzacji drzewa wnioskowane do wycinki 251 - kolejny nr inwentaryzacji

SIECI I PRZYŁĄCZA WG ODRĘBNEGO OPRACOWANIA proj. przyłacze kanalizacji sanitarnej proj. przyłacze kanalizacji deszczowej

HP

proj. podłączenie wpustów projektowany wpust deszczowy proj. przyłącze wodociągowe proj. przyłącze sieci cieplnej proponowana lokalizacja złącz kablowych Kabel zasilający wg opracowania ENERGA Kabel oświetleniowy nn-0,4kV projektowana latarnia wys. 250 cm projektowany słupek oświetleniowy wys. 80 cm

1:500

2018.10.31 AK

16 .


1.02

1.03

1.04

2187 110

180

110

180

110

277

35

180

B22-OP-01 110x230

435.5

B22-OP-01 110x230

148

675 110

B22-OP-01 110x230

725 B22-OP-01 110x230

31

1E

374

8

244

A.01.M.03.04 POKÓJ 10.57 m²

8

80x200

80x200

12

356

626

A.01.M.0 GARDER 1.06

80x200

A.01.M.03.06 A.01.M.03.07 HOL 80x200 7.43 m² ŁAZIENKA 4.87 m²

112 8

12

80x200

90x200 BO

202

132 10x17.22x26

310

310

90x200 BO

A.01.M.02.05 HOL 8.67 m²

45

556

292

362

382

183

12

200

90x200

491

124

80x200 A.01.M.02.06 ŁAZIENKA 4.52 m²

A.01.K.01 KLATKA SCHODOWA

12

90x200 BO

12

286.5

32

90x200 BO

164

3.10

80x200

A.01.M.05.01 SALON Z ANEKSEM 18.46 m²

12

8x17.22x26 90x200 BO

24 320.5

8

110

725

288

160

110

288

160

110

336.5 12

155

675 2187

1.02

1.03

A.01.M. SALO 19.64

A.01.M.01.03 KUCHNIA 7.02 m²

411 24

80x200

8

80x200

244

171

A.01.M.01.06 HOL 4.62 m²

1.04

260.5 B22-OP-01 110x230

300

12

A.01.M.01.05 POKÓJ 10.81 m²

B22-OP-01 110x230

194 31

A.01.M.06.05 POKÓJ 12.24 m²

B22-OP-01 110x230

494

174

411

A.01.M.06.06 POKÓJ 10.45 m²

B22-OP-02 300x231

45 148

150

A.01.M.06.04 LOGGIA 6.81 m²

24

12

349 A.01.M.06.01 SALON 16.51 m²

174

178

102 12

288

288

8

411

110

B22-OP-01 110x230

29

90x200 BO

102

551

A.01.M.01.07 80x200 ŁAZIENKA 4.54 m²

B22-OP-01 110x230

134 8

A.01.M.06.08 ŁAZIENKA 4.54 m²

12

8

80x200

95

8

8

80x200

A.01.M.06.02 WC 1.67 m² 80x200

HOL 8.51 m²

385

125

94

A.01.M.06.07 80x200

31

1B

186

12

A.01.M.06.03 KUCHNIA 7.68 m²

178.5

735

A.01.M.06 - M3k POW. 61.61 m² POW. D. 6.81 m²

187 12

80x200

B22-OP-01 110x230

80

186

204

385

8

110

125.5

1C

24

19

285

304

148

174

A.01.M.04.07 80x200 ŁAZIENKA 4.14 m²

187

12 62

2137

A.01.M.05.02 LOGGIA 4.50 m²

B22-OP-03 285x230

24

8

386

124

A.01.M.05.04 80x200 HOL 10 4.25 m²

690

125.5

A.01.M.05.03 POKÓJ 11.28 m²

174

A.01.M.05.05 ŁAZIENKA 4.47 m²

296

B22-OP-01 110x230

12

12

A SALO

A.01.M.04.06 HOL 7.37 m²

24 388

110

364

A.01.M.04.02 PRALNIA 1.20 m²

309

124 80x200

A.01.M.04.01 SALON Z ANEKSEM 24.69 m²

8

A.01.M.03.05 POKÓJ 8.86 m²

80x200

8 B22-OP-01 110x230

112 8

110

486

195

A.01.M.05 - M2a 38.46 m² POW. 4.50 m² POW. D.

A.01.M.04.04 POKÓJ 10.49 m²

A.01.M.04.05 POKÓJ 8.94 m²

113 1D

288

626

681

8

374

244

124 8

8

B22-OP-03 285x230

125.5

A.01.M.04 - M3a POW. 56.83 m² 4.95 m² POW. D.

338

374

368

45

374

148

A.01.M.04.03 LOGGIA 4.95 m²

110

128.5


UWAGA:

1.06

725

31 148

31

475.5

343

45

1E

148

Projekt

ZESPÓŁ ZABUDOWY MIESZKANIOWEJ

368

B22-OP-03 285x230

650

370

A.01.M.03.03 LOGGIA 4.92 m²

L

B22-OP-01 110x230

256

235

24

B

1D

383

274

110 110 96.5

8

02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Nr upr. Podpis

PROJEKTANT

148

ARCH. MARIA SALONI-SADOWSKA ARCH. WIKTOR GRUSZCZYŃSKI ARCH. KAROLINA MIKLASZEWSKA

735

A.01.M.01 - M2k POW. 49.91 m² POW. D. 6.45 m²

240.5

372.5

110

ARCH. WOJCIECH SZOPIŃSKI ARCH. KATARZYNA FLASIŃSKA-RUBIK ARCH. VLADYSLAV MARCHENKO ARCH. MARCIN SZUBSKI

SPRAWDZAJĄCY ARCH. PIOTR KUCZYŃSKI

Faza projektu

St-398/89

45

PB

Branża

ARCHITEKTURA 31

148

A.01.M.01.04 LOGGIA 6.59 m² 178.5

148

B22-OP-02 300x231

MA/KK/001/02

ARCH. ALEKSANDRA KURZĄTKOWSKA

112 B22-OP-01 110x230

300

WA-164/90

ZESPÓŁ PROJEKTOWY

534.5

.01.01 ON 4 m²

02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Biuro Projektowe Branżowe: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o.

PROF. DR HAB. ARCH. EWA KURYŁOWICZ

24

45

1C

274

B22-OP-03 285x230

Generalny Projektant: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o.

A.01.M.02 - M2k POW. 51.34 m² POW. D. 4.01 m²

A.01.M.02.03 LOGGIA 4.01 m²

332

Eco9 SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ 02-797 Warszawa, ul. Klimczaka 1

111 B22-OP-01 110x230

A.01.M.02.02 KUCHNIA 8.17 m²

A.01.M.02.01 SALON 19.68 m²

Inwestor

690

383 228.5

8 80x200

A

B22-OP-01 110x230

12

A.01.M.02.04 80x200 POKÓJ 10.30 m²

2137

8

W REJONIE UL.GRASERA W TORUNIU DZ. EW. 173/1(część), odręb 30, JED. EW. 046301_1 Schemat

112

499

03.02 ROBA m²

A.01.M.03 - M3a 57.88 m² POW. 4.92 m² POW. D.

110

A.01.M.03.01 ON Z ANEKSEM 25.09 m²

Wszystkie prawa autorskie dotyczące tego rysunku są własnością Kuryłowicz & Associates Sp. z o.o. Niniejszy rysunek jest wydany pod warunkiem iż nie będzie kopiowany, ani udostępniany bez uzgodnienia z K&A Sp. z o.o. Nie nalezy odmierzać wymiarów z rysunku, ani używac go jako szablonu. Niniejsza dokumentacja stanowi część opracowania wielobranżowego. Dokumentację wielobranżową należy rozpatrywać jako całość. Powierzchnia użytkowa mieszkań uwzględnia tynki wewnętrzne gr 1,5cm. Wymiary i wysokości pomieszczeń nie uwzględniają tynków wewnętrznych, odnoszą się do ścian surowych.

PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

ABL-3-01

1B

Tytuł rysunku

BUDYNEK A, RZUT PIĘTRA +1, +2, +3

478.5 725

31

ABL-3-01

Numer rysunku

1803-PB-A-A-2-01 1.06

Skala 1 : 100

Data 2018.10.31

Rysował KM

17


1.02

1.03

1.04

1F

2187 675 248

817

-0.04

186

62 8 124 12 163

12

12

124

A.00.M.02.07 80x200 ŁAZIENKA 4.52 m²

8

80x200

90x200 BO

8

556 286

124 8

80x200

8 80x200

316

10%

24

A.00.M.03.05 POKÓJ 11.39 m²

160

110

160

110

15% 144

494.5

110

B22-OP-01 110x230

171 725

B22-OP-01 110x230

404

B22-OP-01 110x230

90 31

B22-OP-04 404x230

31

367

261 A.00.M.03.06 POKÓJ 9.39 m²

367

80x200

8

15%

12

40.5

186

8 124 261

A.00.M.03.07 POKÓJ 9.39 m²

A.00.M.03.01 SALON 23.23 m²

A.00.M.02.01 SALON 23.88 m²

A.00.M.03.09 ŁAZIENKA 5.57 m²

12

12

A.00.M.03.10 ŁAZIENKA 3.01 m²

A.00.M.03.08 HOL 15.99 m²

8 8

367

498

80x200

80x200

365

204

8 201

80x200

80x200

159

125

8

8

B22-OP-01 110x230

499

A.00.M.02.06 80x200 HOL 8.04 m²

90x200 BO

24

24 204

504

328.5

491

292

362

300 127.5 110

A.00.M.03.02 GARDEROBA 3.45 m²

A.00.M.03.03 KUCHNIA 9.20 m²

110

735

232.5

275.5 298.5 B10M

0.00

10x17.22x26

616

12 A.00.M.04.01 SALON Z ANEKSEM 23.75 m²

43

B22-OP-01 110x230

675

668

725

2187 ABL-4-04 (EL PD)

1.03

1.04

5%

1.02

500

1B

A.00.M.01.06 ŁAZIENKA 3.00 m²

A.00.M.02.02 SZAFA 1.33 m²

8x17.22x26

A.00.M.03 - M4k POW. 90.62 m² 109.64 POW. D. m²

80x200

8 80x200

95 12

90x200 BO

164

296

80x200 12

90x200 BO

690 2137

B22-OP-02 300x231

1C

363

sufit podwieszony h=235cm

1174

A.00.M.04.04 HOL 4.31 m²

A.00.M.01.05 HOL 5.70 m²

A.00.M.01.02 PRALNIA 2.09 m²

80x200A.00.M.05.09 ŁAZIENKA 4.14 m²

A.00.K.01 KLATKA SCHODOWA

8

8

80x200

90x200 BO

124

174

C21-GLN-01

8

186.5

24 112

24

195 110

12

24 68

114 8

A.00.M.04.05 ŁAZIENKA 4.47 m²

12

A.00.M.04.03 POKÓJ 11.28 m²

127.5

0.00

313

80x200

8 34 8

112

246

110

116

388

478

367

A.00.M.01.04 POKÓJ 8.98 m²

A.00.M.05.06 POKÓJ 10.49 m² 80x200

124 8

80x200

B22-OP-01 110x230

336

A.00.M.05.02 A.00.M.05.03 A.00.M.05.08 GARDEROBA PRALNIA HOL 1.23 m² 1.21 m² 8.79 m²

8 80x200

8

8

A.00.M.05.04 KUCHNIA 8.77 m²

288

A.00.M.05.07 POKÓJ 8.94 m²

650 125.5

364

8

201x284.5

244

A.00.M.05.01 SALON 18.01 m²

80x200

372

300

8

374

488

B22-OP-01 110x230

A.00.M.04 - M2a 43.81 m² POW. 34.50 m² POW. D.

725

138.5

68

B22-OP-01 110x230

110

B25-DK-01

B22-OP-02 300x231

1D

180

374

A.00.M.05 - M3k POW. 61.58 m² POW. D. 34.05 m²

110

B22-OP-01 110x230

1E

31

583.5

80x200

725 B22-OP-01 110x230

31

ABL


1.06 1F

ABL-3-01

31

B10M B21-OPC-02

354

300

1E

A.00.M.01 - M2a POW. 41.11 m² POW. D. 22.24 m²

112

650

620.5

A.00.M.01.01 SALON Z ANEKSEM 21.34 m²

B22-OP-01 110x230

274

227

1D

B22-OP-01 110x230

110

43 8

383

B22-OP-01 110x230

Projekt

ZESPÓŁ ZABUDOWY MIESZKANIOWEJ

103.5

A.00.M.02.03 KUCHNIA 8.17 m²

228.5

690

110

12

110

A.00.M.02.05 POKÓJ 10.30 m²

2136.5

383

B21-OPC-02

24

110

354

A.00.M.02 - M2k POW. 56.24 m² POW. D. 31.03 m²

Schemat

1C

278

332

B22-OP-05 278x230

W REJONIE UL.GRASERA W TORUNIU DZ. EW. 173/1(część), odręb 30, JED. EW. 046301_1

L

B

-2.92

735

A

608.5

Inwestor

Eco9 SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ 02-797 Warszawa, ul. Klimczaka 1

-2.67

31

Generalny Projektant: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o.

8

1B

60

25

L-3-01

B22-OP-02 300x231

Wg opisu konstrukcji Okładzina - plytki klinkierowe lub tynk cienkowarstwowy Drzwi wejsciowe Okladzina klatek schodowych - Lustro

B25-DK-01 C21-GLN-01

30.5

67.5

25

Wszystkie prawa autorskie dotyczące tego rysunku są własnością Kuryłowicz & Associates Sp. z o.o. Niniejszy rysunek jest wydany pod warunkiem iż nie będzie kopiowany, ani udostępniany bez uzgodnienia z K&A Sp. z o.o. Nie nalezy odmierzać wymiarów z rysunku, ani używac go jako szablonu. Niniejsza dokumentacja stanowi część opracowania wielobranżowego. Dokumentację wielobranżową należy rozpatrywać jako całość. Powierzchnia użytkowa mieszkań uwzględnia tynki wewnętrzne gr 1,5cm. Wymiary i wysokości pomieszczeń nie uwzględniają tynków wewnętrznych, odnoszą się do ścian surowych.

PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO

UWAGA:

02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Biuro Projektowe Branżowe: Kuryłowicz & Associates Engineering Sp. z o.o.

02-301 Warszawa, ul. Grójecka 22/24 lok. 5 tel.226163798 fax.226163799 Nr upr. Podpis

PROJEKTANT

31

PROF. DR HAB. ARCH. EWA KURYŁOWICZ

WA-164/90

ZESPÓŁ PROJEKTOWY ARCH. MARIA SALONI-SADOWSKA

-1.93

MA/KK/001/02

ARCH. ALEKSANDRA KURZĄTKOWSKA ARCH. WIKTOR GRUSZCZYŃSKI ARCH. KAROLINA MIKLASZEWSKA ARCH. WOJCIECH SZOPIŃSKI ARCH. KATARZYNA FLASIŃSKA-RUBIK

1.06

ARCH. VLADYSLAV MARCHENKO ARCH. MARCIN SZUBSKI

Odwodnienie liniowe rampy 20 cm x 20 cm x 600 cm

SPRAWDZAJĄCY ARCH. PIOTR KUCZYŃSKI

Faza projektu

St-398/89

PB -1.68

Branża

ARCHITEKTURA Tytuł rysunku

BUDYNEK A, RZUT PARTERU

Numer rysunku

1803-PB-A-A-2-00 Skala 1 : 100

Data 2018.10.31

Rysował KM

18


PRZEKR

PRZEKRÓJ A-A

RZUT


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO K

I J

A

RÓJ B-B

E

M

L

D

B C

BUDLEX JAR SP. Z O. O. Z SIEDZIBĄ W TORUNIU ul. Lubicka 54, 87-100 Toruń Generalny Projektant:

1803-PW-A_IJK-5-10 1 : 10

17/07/2019

JM

19


R&D WORKS


20

PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO


SKILL MAP

Re se a

Obs erv ati on Shop Drawings Pinterest

h rc

Handsketchi ng

Presentations for Clients

Archdaily

IN THE OFFICE

Budget Analysis

Graphic Design

Programming

Pre Co Do

Parking Design Zoning Review

lan eP Sit ry a n mi eli Pr

Scheduling

Infrastructu

Facades

Finishes, Fixtures

3D Massing Analyzing Local Laws

Ceilings Interiors

Choice of Doors/Windows

Consultants Coordination

Fire Safety Requirements Virtual/Augum ente r Re alit y 3D

Unity Unreal Engine

Octane

Lumion

Blender Microstation3D

SketchUp AutoCAD 3D

V-Ray

Microsoft

Cinema 4D

Adobe Photoshop Microsoft Word

Microsoft Excel

Grasshopper LadyBug Rhino 3D ETABS

Revit Architecture Google Earth

AutoCAD 2D

NES Specification Software

Specle Revit MEP

C#

Processing Python

Dynamo

ElumTools Dialux AGi132 Canutesoft - FHC

ASTA Power Project Amtech

ArchiCAD

Space Allowances Primavera P6

Revit Structure ArcGis

ion sit ui q Ac

Adobe Illustrator

Google Earth Studio

Navisworks

ta

SolidWorks

Microstation 2D

M BI

Google Street View

Java RunwayML

Coordin ation

NBS Create

Kuka PRC

n utatio Comp tric/ ame Par

Arduino

Adobe InDesign

Vector Graphics

Da

Documentation

Slicer

Adobe Premiere

Microsoft Outlook

AREA OF OP

Catia

3DS Max

SOFTWARE

Mo de lin g

n tio ica br Fa

Ra st er Gr ap hi cs

Keyshot Adobe After Effects

Outline Specs

g erin nd Re

Designing


PAWEŁ SAPIECHA PORTFOLIO Pictures

Consultation

Pra ct ice

ing Permit Build

reparing onstruction ocuments

Recording

Inspection

Open Workshops Supervision

Te ch nic a l Dr aw i

Community Meeting

Site Visit

ng

Lectures

Collecting Data in Terrain

ncy upa Occ stPo

ure Design

OUTSIDE THE OFFICE

Debates Associations Architectural Critique Exhibitions

PERATION

Architectural Education

De si g

Theory

ng ni Painting

Color Sampling

Fabrication

g kin Ma

Model Making

Detail Desing Material Selection

Mixing ingridients Routing 3D Printing

Testing Strength

Testing Various Finishes

MATERIALS Testing Radiance

Testing Durability

Testing Radiance

Testing

21




Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.