La energía en América Latina y el Caribe: acceso, renovabilidad y eficiencia

Page 1

ISSN: 2788-5836 ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

ECLAC Statistical Briefings No. 5 May 2022

Energy in Latin America and the Caribbean: access, renewability and efficiency Contents 1. Despite major improvements in recent decades, certain social groups and certain areas still lack access to electricity. . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Despite a sharp increase in the supply of non-combustible renewable primary energy, the share of fossil fuels in the energy mix is still very high. . . . . 5 3. The energy intensity of GDP is decreasing in the region, which means that efficiency is improving. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4. The energy sector is estimated to account for 55% of greenhouse gas emissions in Latin America and the Caribbean. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Energy is central to addressing almost every major challenge and opportunity in the region, whether it be reducing poverty, producing and cooking food, boosting employment, improving security, using digital services or raising incomes. However, the current energy model with its heavy use of fossil fuels jeopardizes environmental equilibrium, as it is a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7 seeks to ensure access to affordable, secure, sustainable and modern energy. To this end it sets three targets, the first concerning access to energy, the second energy renewability and the third energy efficiency. In what follows, these three aspects will be analysed from a statistical point of view, while the contribution of energy to GHG emissions will be dealt with separately in view of its great relevance to what Alicia Bárcena, the former Executive Secretary of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), has described as the biggest market failure in history.

5. Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

1


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

1. Despite major improvements in recent decades, certain social groups and certain areas still lack access to electricity Latin America and the Caribbean has seen substantial improvements in electricity access since 2000, with the proportion of households that have access to electricity rising from 87% in 2001 to 95.1% in 2019.1 Progress has been particularly strong for households in rural areas, where the proportion with access increased by more than 20 percentage points (from 65.3% to 87.5%). However, as the graphs below show, these very positive figures may mask highly significant differences in access between subregions, countries and social groups.

1. Latin America (16 countries): proportions of the population without access to » Figure electricity, latest year available (Percentages)

25

22.1

20 14.3

15 11.1

Country average

Guatemala

Colombia

Nicaragua

1.5

7.4

El Salvador

1.4

6.1

Panama

0.9

Bolivia (Plur. State of)

0.8

Ecuador

Uruguay

0.7

Mexico

Paraguay

0.4

Chile

0.3

Dominican Rep.

0.3

Costa Rica

0.2 Brazil

0

Peru

4.0

5

4.9

Honduras

10

Latin America (simple average): 4.8%]

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of Household Survey Data Bank (BADEHOG). Note: The Latin American average is calculated from the household surveys conducted by the countries in the year concerned; where there is no information for that year, the most recent previous year is taken.

Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Costa Rica are the countries with the least deprivation in electricity access, with rates of between 0.2% and 0.4%. The situation is much less encouraging in four Central American countries, with 22.1% of the population lacking access to electricity in Guatemala, 14.3% in Nicaragua, 11.1% in El Salvador and 7.4% in Honduras. Besides country of residence, other key factors of inequality for electricity access are geographical area and ethnicity.

1

2

See Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), CEPALSTAT, “Households with availability of basic facilities in the dwelling, by urban and rural areas” [online] https://cepalstat-prod.cepal.org/cepalstat/tabulador/ConsultaIntegrada. asp?idIndicador=260&idioma=s [accessed on 24 July 2020].


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

2. Latin America: proportion of the population without access to electricity, by » Figure income quintile, 2019 (Percentages) 20 17.2

18 16

13.4

14 12

11.6 9.9

10

8.0

8

5.9

6 4

5.2 3.6

3.3 1.8

2

2.0

1.1

0.8

0.9

0.3

0 Quintile 1

Quintile 2

Quintile 3 National

Urban

Quintile 4

Quintile 5

Rural

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of Household Survey Data Bank (BADEHOG). Note: The Latin American averages are calculated from the household surveys conducted by the countries in the year concerned; where there is no information for that year, the most recent previous year is taken.

With respect to inequalities by geographical area, figure 2 shows that it is the inhabitants of rural areas who have the least access to electricity in all income quintiles. It can be seen that rates of non-access to the service are 2% and 0.9% for the highest-income households, i.e., those in quintiles 4 and 5, while the lowest-income quintiles, namely 1 and 2, have averages of 12% and 6%. When it comes to inequalities in access by ethnic group, figure 3 shows that 13% of those identifying as indigenous have no access to electricity, versus 4% for those who do not identify as indigenous or Afrodescendent. It should be stressed that only 10 countries in the region have included a question on ethnicity in their household surveys, which are the data source for this indicator.

3


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

3. Latin America: proportion of the indigenous population, Afrodescendent » Figure population and rest of the population without electricity, 2019 (Percentages) 16 14

13.4

12 10 8 6 3.8

4 1.6

2 0

Indigenous

Afrodescendent

Neither indigenous nor Afrodescendent

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of Household Survey Data Bank (BADEHOG). Note: The Latin American averages are calculated from the household surveys conducted by the countries in the year concerned; where there is no information for that year, the most recent previous year is taken.

Apart from access to electricity, another important aspect of energy inequality concerns the type of fuel used for cooking. The use of certain fuels, such as wood, charcoal, paraffin and oil, can have negative impacts not only on people’s health (especially women’s) because of smoke emissions in particular,2 but also on the environment because of the pressure on natural resources, including forests. The Dominican Republic, Uruguay and Brazil are the countries in the region where the highest proportions of households use gas for cooking, with rates of 95%, 94.3% and 94.3% respectively. In Honduras, 76.9% of households use firewood, charcoal, paraffin or oil for cooking. Costa Rica presents an atypical situation, as it has the highest proportion of households cooking with electricity in the region (48.7%), followed by Paraguay with 13.6%. Paraguay is also an exception in South America in that 32.8% of households still cook with wood, charcoal, paraffin or oil.

2

4

See World Health Organization (WHO), WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: household fuel combustion, Geneva, 2014 [online] https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/141496/9789241548885_eng.pdf.


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

» Figure 4. Latin America (15 countries): cooking fuels, latest year available (Percentages) 100 90

0.1 12.9

4.9

1.9 6.6

2.2 5.5

1.6 12.1

80

0.7 8.3

10.0

0.9

0.2 9.8

13.6

0.7

3.5

4.2 1.4

6.1 18.6

17.6

48.7

70

0.4

17.0 54.5

32.8

60 50 84.3

94.3

91.2

85.1

30

4.3

92.0

90.0

76.9

46.8

20

94.3 74.1

73.5 52.9

44.8

10

95.0

89.7

81.9

Firewood or derivatives, charcoal, paraffin, oil

Electricity

Latin America (simple average)

Uruguay

Dominican Rep.

Peru

Paraguay

Panama

Nicaragua

El Salvador

Ecuador

Costa Rica

Colombia

Chile

Brazil

Bolivia (Plur. State of)

Gas

Mexico

12.0

0

Honduras

40

Other

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of Household Survey Data Bank (BADEHOG).

2. Despite a sharp increase in the supply of noncombustible renewable primary energy, the share of fossil fuels in the energy mix is still very high As figure 5 shows, the non-renewable primary energy supply increased by a factor of 2.3 between 1970 and 2019, from 1.703 billion barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) to 3.990 billion BOE. Over the same period, the renewable primary energy supply increased by a factor of 2.87 from 0.584 billion BOE to 1.679 billion BOE. The decrease in the non-renewable primary supply from 2013 might be explained by the 52% decrease in the primary supply of oil from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which fell from 63 million BOE to 30 million BOE.

5


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

5. Latin America and the Caribbean: renewable primary energy supply » Figure (combustible and non-combustible) and non-renewable primary energy supply, 1970–2019

(Million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e)) 7 000 6 000 5 000 4 000 3 000 2 000 1 000

1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0

Non-combustible renewable primary energy

Combustible renewable primary energy

Non-renewable primary energy

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2021 (LC/PUB.2021/20-P), Santiago, 2021.

By 2019, the primary energy supply derived from fossil fuels (oil, gas and coal) was 70% of the total in Latin America and the Caribbean, close to the global average of 75.19%,3 with oil accounting for 32%, natural gas for 33% and coal for just 5%. The high shares of oil and natural gas and the smaller one of coal relative to the global percentages can be attributed to the character of the region’s industrial and services infrastructure and to its levels of oil, natural gas and coal reserves. It is important to note that the share of fossil fuels varies greatly by sector. In the transport sector, it is 99%, while in the electricity generation sector it is estimated at 55%.4 According to the Latin American Energy Organization (OLADE), and as figure 6 shows, the total share of the renewable primary energy supply in Latin America and the Caribbean is 29.6%. The distribution of the renewable primary energy supply by energy source can be grouped into two main categories according to their environmental impact. Combustible energy sources represent 16.6% of the primary energy supply, divided between sugar cane and derivatives (8.4%) and firewood (8.2%), while non-combustible energy sources (i.e., sources that do not emit pollutants into the air people breathe when energy is produced) account for 13%.

3

4

6

See L. Rivera Albarracín, “El cambio climático y el desarrollo energético sostenible en América Latina y el Caribe al amparo del Acuerdo de París y de la Agenda 2030”, Documentos de Trabajo, No. 15, Madrid, Fundación Carolina, 2019. See Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) and others, “Policy Brief 11: SDG 7 in Latin America and the Caribbean region”, Accelerating SDG 7 Achievement: SDG 7 Policy Briefs in Support of the High-Level Political Forum 2019, United Nations, 2019.


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

6. Latin America and the Caribbean: renewable primary energy supply by energy » Figure type, 2019 (Percentages)

Hydroenergy 8.2 Geothermal 0.5 Other 4.2

Non-combustible

Firewood 8.1

13.0

29.6

16.6

Sugar cane and derivatives 8.4

Renewable proportion of the primary energy supply

Combustible

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2021 (LC/PUB.2021/20-P), Santiago, 2021.

The 8.2% share of hydroenergy reflects its historical importance in the region as a power source. Figure 7 shows how the distribution of sources in the renewable primary energy supply has evolved over time and reveals significant changes between 2000 and 2019, with a decrease in the share of firewood from 39% to 27.5% and of hydroenergy from 35% to 28%. Conversely, the share of wind and solar energy in particular was up,5 rising from 4.1% to 14.4%, while that of sugar cane also increased, from 19.5% to 28.4%.

5

This also includes other non-combustible renewable energy sources such as tidal energy. For more information, see Latin American Energy Organization (OLADE), Panorama Energético de América Latina y el Caribe 2019, Quito, 2019 [online] http://biblioteca.olade.org/ opac-tmpl/Documentos/old0434b.pdf.

7


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

7. Latin America and the Caribbean: renewable primary energy supply » Figure (combustible and non-combustible), by source, 2000–2019 (Percentages)

100 90 80 70 60 50

Firewood Cane sugar and derivatives Geothermal Hydroenergy Other primary

40 30 20 10 0

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2021 (LC/PUB.2021/20-P), Santiago, 2021.

3. The energy intensity of GDP is decreasing in the region, which means that efficiency is improving The energy intensity of GDP is an indicator of how much in the way of energy resources a country needs to generate one unit of gross domestic product (GDP). A low ratio indicates that less energy is used to produce each monetary unit of economic output, and a higher ratio that more energy is required. While the ratio can indicate the level of efficiency with which an economy uses energy resources, there are also other factors that influence this indicator and that are not necessarily related to efficiency, such as climate or changes in the sectoral composition of GDP. Figure 8 shows two energy intensities: one calculated in relation to the primary energy supply and one calculated in relation to final energy consumption. Although there are variations between years, Latin America and the Caribbean emerges as one of the world regions that are least intensive in final energy consumption, with intensity declining by 13% over the last 30 years from 900 BOE per million dollars of GDP (at constant 2010 prices) in 1990 to 780 BOE per million dollars of GDP in 2019.

8


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

8: Latin America and the Caribbean: energy intensity of gross domestic product » Figure (GDP), 1990–2019 (Latin America and the Caribbean: energy intensity of gross domestic product (GDP), 1990–2019) 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4

Primary energy supply

0.3

Final energy consumption

0.2 0.0

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0.1

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2021 (LC/PUB.2021/20-P), Santiago, 2021.

Although there are variations between years, Latin America and the Caribbean emerges as one of the world regions that are least intensive in final energy consumption, with intensity declining by 13% over the last 30 years from 900 BOE per million dollars of GDP (at constant 2010 prices) in 1990 to 780 BOE per million dollars of GDP in 2019. A second key indicator for measuring energy efficiency is the ratio of electricity losses to electricity supply. Electricity losses, whether technical or non-technical, represent the amount of electricity that is lost as it moves through the energy chain, from origin to final consumption. Losses occur in storage, transformation, transmission and distribution. Among the reasons for technical losses are wastage due to natural heating of the transformers and conductors that transport the electricity from the power plants to where it is consumed. Non-technical losses include losses due to administrative errors, metering anomalies, self-connecting users and energy theft.6

6

For more information, see Latin American Energy Organization (OLADE), Panorama Energético de América Latina y el Caribe 2019, Quito, 2019 [online] http://biblioteca.olade.org/opac-tmpl/Documentos/old0434b.pdf.

9


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

9: Latin America and the Caribbean: electricity sector losses as a proportion of » Figure the total electricity supply, 1970–2019 (Percentages)

18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2

1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2021 (LC/PUB.2021/20-P), Santiago, 2021.

Despite the efforts made by governments and energy companies, it can be seen in figure 9 that the proportion of electricity lost increased from 12% to 16% between 1970 and 1994. This level remained stable as of 2019, although a slight decrease to 14.6% can be observed in 2016. This means that 16% of the electricity generated by the region’s energy system is wasted, a high level compared to that in the OECD countries (6%). It should be stressed that there are significant differences between countries and subregions, with upward of 20% of electricity being lost in the Caribbean and some Central American countries.

4. The energy sector is estimated to account for 55% of greenhouse gas emissions in Latin America and the Caribbean The availability of basic energy statistics and appropriate, reliable and timely energy accounts is essential for estimating GHG emissions and designing public policies to mitigate climate change. Energy statistics are the main source of data for calculating energy-related GHG emissions.7 Figure 10 shows that the structural trend of the data indicates an increase in total GHG emissions in Latin America and the Caribbean. From the historical data for the period 1990–2018, it can be affirmed that total GHG emissions in the region increased by 80% over that time. It should be noted that emissions from land use change and boiler fuels are not included.

7

10

See L. Rivera Albarracín, “El cambio climático y el desarrollo energético sostenible en América Latina y el Caribe al amparo del Acuerdo de París y de la Agenda 2030”, Documentos de Trabajo, No. 15, Madrid, Fundación Carolina, 2019.


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

10. Latin America and the Caribbean: greenhouse gas emissions, by sector, » Figure 1990–2018 (Millions of tons of carbon dioxide equivalent)

3 500 3 000 2 500 2 000 1 500

Industrial processes Waste

1 000

Agriculture Energy

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

0

1990

500

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2021 (LC/PUB.2021/20-P), Santiago, 2021.

Figure 11 shows how specific the region’s behaviour is compared to that of the world, where 78% of global GHG emissions are attributed to the energy sector, 23 percentage points more than in Latin America and the Caribbean (55%). It is important to note that Latin America and the Caribbean contributes a small share of the global total. In 2018, the region contributed 3.179 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2eq), which represented approximately 7% of total global GHG emissions.

11. Latin America and the Caribbean and rest of the world: greenhouse gas » Figure emissions, by sector, 2018 (Percentages)

Latin America and the Caribbean

8

World

5

4

6

12 55 32 78

Energy

Agriculture

Waste

Industrial processes

Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2021 (LC/PUB.2021/20-P), Santiago, 2021.

11


ECLAC STATISTICAL BRIEFINGS

5.

Conclusions:

While the region has made great progress towards SDG 7 in respect of access, renewability and efficiency alike, there are still critical challenges requiring very substantial investment. The recommendations formulated by ECLAC8 for the next steps can be summarized as follows: a.

Target access efforts on informal settlements and remote areas;

b.

Reduce electricity bills for poor households;

c.

Pursue convergence between electricity prices and the cost of electricity production;

d.

Establish public policies to promote renewable energies as policies of State;

e.

Promote the use of clean ovens in countries where wood-burning will continue to be widespread in the coming years;

f.

Establish regulatory frameworks for energy efficiency and national energy efficiency policies;

g.

Invest in the production, use and dissemination of high-quality energy statistics;

h.

Promote the use of low-energy equipment.

See Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) and others, “Policy Brief 11: SDG 7 in Latin America and the Caribbean region”, Accelerating SDG 7 Achievement: SDG 7 Policy Briefs in Support of the High-Level Political Forum 2019, United Nations, 2019..

8

This publication, which is issued bimonthly, is prepared by the Statistics Division of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). This issue was prepared by Alberto Malmierca, Camila Quiróz and Pauline Leonard, under the overall supervision of Rolando Ocampo, Chief of the Division. The views expressed in this document, a translation of a Spanish original which did not undergo formal editing, are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Organization or the countries it represents. https://www.cepal.org/en/work-areas/statistics

12


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.