Coventry Cathedral Conservation Management Plan

Page 107

CONSERVATION FRAMEWORK

5.2.6 PRINCIPLE 4: MANAGE COVENTRY CATHEDRAL IN A WAY THAT ADVOCATES SUSTAINABLE CHANGE AND IN COLLABORATION WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS. Management and use Coventry Cathedral is managed by a traditional structure of a Dean and Chapter supported by the Cathedral Administrator (Business Manager), Canons and a number of paid employees with different specialisms. The FAC and CFCE are statutory bodies that approve and advise on change. Those responsible for the care and management of Coventry Cathedral should work collaboratively to monitor and manage change in an informed way. This management will need to be timely and intelligent, using this CMP as a baseline. A holistic and longterm plan for the Cathedral, supported by informed managers, will be beneficial to avoid ad hoc change. Consultation with stakeholders Public and stakeholder consultation is also vital to understanding the needs of users; it helps to foster a sense of local ownership in the process of change. Consultation with interested parties, internal departments, experts and the general public provides an opportunity to inform audiences about what is happening and why. This is the only way in which proposals can adequately reflect the needs and desires of the building’s users within the parameters of sustainable conservation and care of the building.

The statutory approvals process Early and on-going consultation with the FAC and CFCE will be highly beneficial to successfully obtaining permission for the proposals. These and other bodies such as Historic England, and amenity societies (such as the SPAB, Victorian Society, Twentieth Century Society, Ancient Monuments Society and Council for British Archaeology) can offer a wealth of advice and information. Their advice will be invaluable in shaping proposals as they evolve and engaging early with statutory authorities will help ensure a smooth journey through the planning system. Assessment questions: • Do the necessary governance and management skills exist inhouse or does external expert advice need to be sought? •

Should the decision be subject to wider consultation and engagement? o

Should this be internal or external?

o

Will it have an impact on users?

o

What form will the engagement take?

Do proposals require statutory consent? o

Scheduled monument consent

o

FAC/CFCE consent

o

Listed building consent

o

Planning consent

o

Conservation Area consent

107

Compliance with policy and guidance Care of Cathedrals Measure 2011: Chapter must seek and obtain approval before implementing any works that would materially affect the architectural, archaeological, artistic or historic character of the Cathedral church, its immediate setting or any archaeological remains. NPPF paragraph 193: When considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should be given to the asset’s conservation (and the more important the asset, the greater the weight should be). Historic England Conservation Principle 4: Significant places should be managed to sustain their values ICOMOS, Approaches to the conservation of 20th century cultural heritage 2017: Article 6: Manage change sensitively. Article 10: Give consideration to environmental sustainability. Article 11: Promote and celebrate twentieth-century cultural heritage with the wider community.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

5.3.15 Summary of Policies

4hr
pages 152-370

5.3.14 Adoption, Advice and Approvals

9min
pages 143-148

5.3.12 Landscape and Setting

7min
pages 138-140

5.3.13 Research and Understanding

4min
pages 141-142

5.3.11 Environmental Sustainability

5min
pages 136-137

5.3.9 Visitor Facilities and Access

6min
pages 130-132

5.3.10 Interpretation

5min
pages 133-135

5.3.8 Operations, Management and Use

6min
pages 127-129

5.3.6 Repair, Maintenance and Conservation

8min
pages 121-124

5.3.7 Restoration and New Works

4min
pages 125-126

5.3.4 Ruined Cathedral

3min
pages 116-117

5.3.5 New Cathedral

6min
pages 118-120

5.3.3 Design Vision

3min
pages 114-115

Best Practice

5min
pages 110-112

Inform Future Proposals

2min
page 109

5.2.5 Relative Levels of Impact

1min
page 106

that Advocates Sustainable Change and in Collaboration with Key Stakeholders

3min
pages 107-108

Change to Understand the Benefits or Harm to Significance

4min
pages 104-105

Clear Understanding of the Need for Change

2min
page 103

5.1 How To Use This Framework

1min
page 100

Assessing Significance

4min
pages 96-98

3.6.3 City of Culture and Beyond

1min
pages 85-86

3.6.2 Visitors and Tourism

3min
page 84

3.5.2 Secular Legislation and National Planning Policy

3min
page 81

3.1.5 Wider Precinct and Surroundings

5min
pages 63-67

3.1.3 Cathedral Precinct

0
page 60

3.1.2 New Cathedral

1min
page 59

2.3.7 Old and New – The Cathedral of Addition

2min
page 53

2.3.4 Influence on Post-War Reconstruction

4min
page 51

2.3.3 International Context and Influences

3min
page 50

2.3.2 National Context and Influences

4min
pages 48-49

2.1.10 Consecration

1min
page 39

2.1.8 A Plain Jewel Casket

1min
page 37

2.1.9 The Jewel Casket Filled

1min
page 38

2.1.4 The Ruined City and the Site

6min
pages 23-24

2.1.3 St Michael’s – The Second Cathedral

2min
page 22

2.1.7 Construction – The Four Phases of the Design

10min
pages 30-36

1.1.1 Defining the Site

1min
page 9

HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT

3min
pages 16-18

1.1 Purpose of the Report

2min
page 8
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.