the journal Vol. 145, Issue 19
Queen’s University
F r i d ay J a n u a r y 2 6 , 2 0 1 8
Our AMS
Endorsement Page 7
since
Controversy surrounds ASUS election with two disqualifications Teams reinstated, accusations of conflicts of interest among candidates cause discrepancies Ejaz Thawer and Maureen O’Reilly Journal Staff This story first appeared online on Jan. 25. At approximately 6 p.m. on Jan. 22, two of three teams running for ASUS executive were notified of their disqualification for campaigning outside the designated period. After unsuccessfully appealing their disqualification to ASUS Policy and Elections Review Committee (PERC), the teams brought their cases to the AMS Judicial Committee. The committee then reinstated both teams, replacing their disqualification with temporary campaign blackouts. The disqualification
What’s Inside?
1873
Only 18 hours after the campaigning period had begun, Teams Harmony & Gurjot and Sagal & Alissa were notified via email that they were disqualified from ASUS elections. The disqualification was based on ASUS Policy Manual 2, Section C-3.08, which reads: “Any instances of campaigning outside of the campaign period will result in immediate disqualification.” According to current ASUS President Jasmine Lagundzija, one of the teams was caught with a volunteer Facebook group that encouraged students to vote for them prior to the campaign period beginning on Jan. 22 at midnight. Meanwhile, the other team had posted an Instagram on one of their
personal accounts announcing their candidacy approximately one hour before the campaigning period began. According to Team Sagal & Alissa, their volunteer Facebook group wasn’t made with the intent to campaign. “We know the ASUS rules on campaigning before the campaign period has started,” the team said. “We were simply building our team of volunteers and supporters, as almost every ASUS and AMS executive team has done. We were following precedent … We didn’t actually even post any campaign material in the group until 12:03 p.m., which was a full 12 hours into the campaign period.” The team said the ruling stemmed from anonymous complaints from people that were added to the group without consenting. However, Team Sagal & Alissa claim they didn’t add any non-consenting volunteers. “We know that creating a team’s volunteer group before the start of campaigning is not only common practice, but it’s also essential for communicating any logistical information [with our volunteers] before the campaign period begins,” the team said. Team Harmony & Gurjot told The Journal the private account photo linked to their disqualification had “an innocuous caption that had nothing to do with [their] campaign.” The team took issue with the ruling and connected it to the “archaic practices” that restrict student participation in ASUS. Appeal to ASUS Policy and Elections Review Committee
After the ASUS elections team determined that both teams had violated policy, they provided instructions to each team on how to appeal to the ASUS Policy and Elections Review Committee (PERC). Although both teams went
See ASUS on page 5
PHOTO ILLUSTRATION BY JUSTICE KING
NEWS
FEATURE
OPINIONS
SPORTS
SGPS loses $120,000 in new PSAC 901 agreement
House on Earl has a
When can we forgive
history of its own
politicans for past mistakes?
Kevin Bailie wins 50th game Our experience at a Psychic as member of Gaels
page 3
page 6
page 8
page 11
queensjournal.ca
@queensjournal
@queensjournal
@queensjournal
LIFESTYLE
page 16 @thequeensjournal