F r i d ay , F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 1 5 — I s s u e 2 2
j the ournal Queen’s University — Since 1873
Melody Torcolacci was absent from the first HLTH 102 lecture since slides emerged showing that she taught anti-vaccination material in the class.
ACADEMICS
Admin aware of Torcolacci problems in 2011 Former student says faculty and department “stonewalled” him B y C hloe S obel News Editor Though Principal Daniel Woolf was unaware of complaints against Melody Torcolacci’s teaching until Wednesday morning, a former student claims the University was made aware of the complaints he filed in 2011. Chao Gu told the Journal via email that he’d complained not only to Torcolacci but to many members of the faculty and administration: the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies (SKHS) Undergraduate Chair Kathy Jackson, SKHS Director Jean Côté, then-Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Science Alistair MacLean, Associate Dean Bob Lemieux, Associate Dean of Studies Hugh Horton, Acting Associate Dean of Studies David Pugh and then-Senior Associate to the Provost Charles Sumbler. He also said he lodged complaints with 2011-12 AMS Academic Affairs Commissioner Mira Dineen. “All of them had stonewalled my issues, and [had] done nothing to help me,” said Gu, ArtSci ’12.
Photos from ice level of hockey’s oldest rivalry page 14
“The claims that the administration was not aware of the issues are false and absurd.” Gu provided the Journal with various items of correspondence, including his first complaint, a Sept. 29, 2011 email to Jackson. His initial complaint regarded Health 230, “Basic Human Nutrition”. He listed five concerns: Torcolacci’s PowerPoints didn’t include citations; her notes cited secondary reference sources, including Wikipedia and Mercola; she misrepresented some of the studies cited; she showed the class a video that didn’t disclose conflicts of interest; and because she said she’d test the class on viewpoints that are sometimes contradictory, she might not be able to separate these effectively when marking tests. Gu told Jackson he’d spoken to Dineen, as well as “numerous” other students who shared his concerns, about Torcolacci’s performance. Gu spoke with Jackson and Côté on Oct. 3, 2011. They told him the first two issues would be resolved. After receiving a PowerPoint that See Harrison on page 5
DIVESTMENT
Queen’s looks at divestment Campus groups, student voters push to divest from fossil fuels B y J acob R osen Assistant News Editor Following a push from students and campus groups, the University has launched discussions on fossil fuel divestment. In last week’s AMS winter referendum, 4,127 students — or 73.5 per cent of voters — voted in favour of the AMS assessing the feasibility of divestment from fossil fuels from its Restricted Funds portfolio and the Queen’s University Pooled Endowment Fund. 1,488 students, or 26.5 per cent, voted against. “Because students have given us such a strong mandate, we will be definitely looking into feasibility of fossil fuel divestment,” said Tuba Chishti, the student representative
on the Board of Trustees Advisory Committee on Fossil Fuel Divestment. Chishti, ArtSci ’15, said she couldn’t discuss specifics about the committee because of the confidential nature of the University’s financial investments, but added that the committee has to consider various factors that would be affected by divestment before making any decisions. She said the committee will create a website within the next two weeks to keep the public informed on its progress. The committee, which was struck in late December, plans to present an official report to the University Board of Trustees by June in order for the Board to make a decision before the next
fiscal year. The referendum question also addressed the AMS Restricted Funds portfolio, which is a separate issue from the University’s Pooled Endowment Fund. Chishti, who chairs the AMS Board of Directors, said the Board has yet to hold a meeting discussing divestment. The push to divest from fossil fuels began before the referendum question was proposed to students, when Queen’s Backing Action on Climate Change (QBACC) presented a formal proposal to Principal Daniel Woolf and the University Board of Trustees. The proposal contained a petition of roughly 500 student, faculty and alumni signatures
QTV alumni talk Studio Q benefits and losses page 8 ReUnion in admin’s best interest page 7
See QBACC on page 6
ARTS: New beginnings for the Tett Centre
page 11