Feature
dialogue
arts
sports
postscript
Kingston Transit is looking to expand its routes through campus. Page 3
Letters to the editor on the suspension of Queen’s Bands. Page 9
Union Gallery presents The Sins of Our Fathers.
A morning with the Queen’s figure skating team. Page 15
Exploring the world of puppetry.
Page 11
Page 20
F r i d ay , N o v e m b e r 2 5 , 2 0 11 — I s s u e 2 2
the journal Queen’s University — Since 1873
Occupy Kingston
Eviction decision pending B y M eaghan Wray Assistant News Editor
year-long English course for first-year students. During the Sept. 27 Senate meeting, the task force was given approximately two months to present a finalized plan. “Realistically, they just ran out of time,” Morelli said. Morelli, an assistant professor in the department of physics, engineering physics and astronomy, drafted an amendment to the
Approximately 25 Occupy Kingston protesters gathered in Confederation Park on Wednesday to discuss possible eviction. On Dec. 6, Kingston city council members will put the eviction decision to a vote, which will determine Occupy Kingston’s next move. Protesters have occupied the park since Oct. 15. Fewer than five protesters have slept in the structure erected in the park since the movement began. According to a city bylaw, the current set-up in the park is illegal. Councillor for the Loyalist-Carataqui District Kevin George spearheaded the motion that will come to council. Part of the motion reads: “Be it resolved that the Occupy Kingston protesters be requested to cease camping and to remove all shelters, tents, equipment and debris from Confederation Park by no later than 12:01 a.m. on Thursday, December 8, 2011 and to refrain from carrying out any of those activities in other city parks and municipally owned public spaces.” “That does not mean that they cannot continue to protest by sitting in the park, holding up signs,” George said in an interview. “Constitutional rights allows for that.” City council is sympathetic to the issues being addressed by the Occupy movement, he said. “We, as a council, understand what it is that … many of the 99 per cent face,” he said. “We’ve all been there at one time or another.” Although Kingston bylaw officers have received negative phone calls regarding the protesters, George said, council has asked officials not to act yet. “We want this as peaceful as we possibly can, and that’s what we want to do,” he said. “The last thing that I would like to see is these individuals have their future records tarnished by being arrested.”
See Twenty-two on page 6
See Occupiers on page 5
Fine Arts students congregrate outside the Robert Sutherland building on Tuesday to protest the recent decision to suspend admissions to the Fine Arts program.
photo by Corey Lablans
fine arts
Senate stalls initiative on suspensions Motion looked to create guidelines on future academic program suspensions B y S avoula S tylianou Assistant News Editor
sure that in the future, there are specific guidelines for the process of suspending admissions to a program. “The motion we brought up was a Senate-specific issue. The suspension of the program, in our opinion, was a faculty board issue,” Francis, ArtSci ’13, said.
On Tuesday, Queen’s Senate tabled an initiative that called for guidelines for future program suspensions. The motion was tabled after a Senate vote. It was brought to Senate on the same day that 30 Fine Arts students protested the admissions suspension outside the Academics meeting. They held personal works of art to draw attention to the issue. On Nov. 9, Fine Arts students were told via email that admissions to the program were suspended. On Nov. 10, a motion passed at AMS Assembly that led to B y C atherine O wsik the creation of a committee that Assistant News Editor includes the AMS executive, the ASUS executive and the Queen’s The Academic Plan that will direct rector. This committee presented the University’s academic future the motion to Senate. was unanimously approved at The Senate motion called Tuesday’s Senate meeting. for a policy document outlining The current plan includes 22 formal procedures for suspending specific recommendations, eight academic programs or general university standards program admissions. and six guiding points for the Rector Nick Francis said the planning process. motion was written to make This is a significant reduction
Francis said the motion was tabled because senators felt there hadn’t been enough time to discuss the issue. “They said they needed to discuss it when there were non-reactive responses,” he said. A committee to discuss the future of the Fine Arts program
was created by the administration under the leadership of Associate Dean of Arts and Sciences Gordon Smith. Kaisa Moran, the Fine Arts departmental student council (DSC) chair, said the first meeting was held on Tuesday. See They on page 7
Academic Plan gets go-ahead
Unanimous Senate support for revised recommendations from the 89 recommendations that were initially presented to Senate by the Academic Planning Task Force (APTF) on Sept. 27. During the September meeting senators voiced concerns around the over-specificity and financial motives of the plan. “[The APTF] took anything objectionable out of the Academic Plan,” Senator Jordan Morelli said, referencing points included in the September plan like a mandatory