Railway-News Magazine Issue 1 / 2016 by a2b Global Media

Crossing London An in-depth look at the capitalâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Crossrail project

The latest news & reviews from the industry

How Resilient are Our Railways to Climate Change?Â

ISSUE ONE 2016

Letter from the Editor Welcome to the ﬁrst magazine issue of 2016 for Railway-News. Many changes have been afoot here at the Railway-News office. I have taken on the position of editor-inchief, a challenge and opportunity I’m very much looking forward to. Our editorial department has expanded and many exciting things lie in store.

obviously good news for the rail sector and investment is pushing forward new projects. So for this issue we’ll be looking at Crossrail and what it will do for London.

Zetica looks at trackbed inspection and how it enhances track safety, This issue has an emphasis on safety while Parker Hannifin discusses and security in the rail industry. As pneumatic solutions for extreme such, we look at how resilient our operating conditions, a timely piece to railways are to climate change. We complement our look at climate have an article examining ENISA’s change. Goldschmidt Thermit looks at report on cyber security and Luke how the life cycle of rails can be Upton from SmartRail World writes improved and Wayside Inspection about how different countries are Devices write about tracking position. responding to the terrorist threat in Monitoring this is a key safety feature the rail and metro sector. A second as issues with tracking position could contribution by Luke Upton looks at ultimately lead to derailment. Finally, the NTSB’s Most Wanted List for safety BT Cables introduces itself to our improvements. Finally, we have an readers. overview of what the Internet of Things means to the rail sector. All of us here at Railway-News hope We are also introducing regular features to our magazine. Every issue will feature an article with a European focus as well as one on a major infrastructure project. This issue’s European feature is Copped Out, which takes a look how the COP21 climate change negotiations that took place in December 2015 completely failed to give any consideration to public transport and the contributions it could make to reducing its environmental impact. Happily, the railways have been receiving massive investment of late and we believe they are the choice of the future as they are the most environmentally friendly form of public transport. Therefore the opportunities are huge. This is

you enjoy this issue as much as the last. If you have any questions or suggestions, please don’t hesitate to get in touch. Meanwhile, enjoy the read and we will be back again in March.

ANDREW LUSH Director al@railway-news.com

JOSEPHINE CORDERO SAPIÉN Editor-in-chief jcs@railway-news.com

NICOLA BROWN Head of Sales nb@railway-news.com

NAOMI THOMPSON Contributing Editor nt@railway-news.com

AMBER GUY-KEMP Head of Client Content agk@railway-news.com A2B Global Media Third Floor 11–15 Dix’s Field Exeter EX1 1QA United Kingdom Office: +44 (0)1392 580002 Mobile: +44 (0)7432 725001 Email: info@railway-news.com Website: www.railway-news.com If you would like to submit editorial content, or you are interested in giving an interview for the magazine, please contact Josephine Cordero Sapién. If you would like your company to join Railway-News’s online platform, please contact Andrew Lush. To subscribe to our newsletter, visit www.railway-news.com.

Josephine Cordero Sapién, editor-in-chief

COVER: Courtesy of Bombardier

Protecting your depot’s most valuable assets

Zonegreen’s SMART DPPS™ Give your rail depot workforce the confidence to work safely & effectively. Even with all of the expensive infrastructure and equipment present in modern railway

advanced, high-quality, reliable, proven and widely-installed product of its kind, with

depots, the most valuable element of any rail facility will always be its workforce. Zonegreen’s SMART Depot Personnel

installations both across the UK and around the world. The company boasts unparalleled expertise and experience in depot protection

Protection System (DPPS™) protects workers by safely and efficiently controlling train movements within depots.

systems and employs an array of highly-skilled specialist engineering staff. Zonegreen is also an experienced and

By far the market leader, Zonegreen’s DPPS™

trusted provider of depot interlocking

has an unrivalled reputation as the most

solutions.

Zonegreen contact: E-mail: info@zonegreen.co.uk Tel: +44 (0)114 230 0822 Fax: +44 (0)871 872 0349

www.zonegreen.co.uk 4

Contents EDITORIAL FEATURES p.6

How Resilient are Our Railways to Climate Change? Our railways are green and therefore a perfect transport choice for the future, but can they withstand the challenges put upon them by our climate?

p.20

‘New efforts are essential…’ – Rail, Metro and the Terrorist Threat A look at responses to security threats around the world in the wake of the Paris attacks.

p.22

Cyber Security Threats to Public Transport A closer look at ENISA’s Cyber Security and Resilience of Intelligent Public Transport report.

p.35

The Internet of Things and the Railway Industry With machine-to-machine connectivity now commonplace, how is the Internet of Things impacting our railways?

p.44

NTSB’s Most-Wanted List – A ‘Road Map from Lessons Learned to Lives Saved’ Puts Focus on Rail Technology What’s on the 2016 Most-Wanted List for the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board?

REGULAR FEATURES p.10

Europe COP21 – Copped Out on Transport Why did the final agreement of the climate change negotiations of December 2015 make no mention of transport?

p.30

Major Infrastructure Projects in the Rail Industry Crossing London A detailed look at the Crossrail project being built in and under London right now.

p.48

Upcoming Events February – April 2016

SUPPLIER FEATURES p.13

Goldschmidt Thermit: Lengthening the Rail Life Cycle Given the immense stresses rails are put under constantly in all weathers, what can be done to improve their life cycle?

p.17

Parker Hannifin: 3 Ways to Achieve Reliable Pneumatic Performance in Extreme Operating Conditions Dave Walker outlines some key considerations when selecting pneumatic solutions for extreme environments.

p.25

Zetica: The RASC® Pod – Rethinking Trackbed Inspection Part 1 of this two-part feature looks at the improved return on investment for inspection and enhanced track safety.

p.28

Multi-Contact Invests in a Modern Testing Laboratory for Railway Technology Components Find out more about the new laboratory at the company’s centre for railway technology in France.

p.38

Wayside Inspection Devices: Tracking Position: Wearing Out the Wheel-Rail Interface With wayside inspection becoming much more sophisticated, how can it be used to improve the safety of rail infrastructure and rolling stock?

p.43

BT Cables BT Cables discusses its growth, performance and social responsibility commitments.

p.46

Windhoff Will Deliver 35 Self-Propelled On-Track Machines to Swiss Federal Railways SBB German company Windhoff win their largest individual contract in their history.

How Resilient are Our Railways to Climate Change? Our railways are green and therefore a perfect transport choice for the future, but can they withstand the challenges put By Josephine Cordero Sapién upon them by our climate? Our transport network has always been impacted by our climate and natural events. This is true for air, sea, road and rail transport. Storms and high winds will stop ferries from sailing and snow and ice regularly cause chaos on the roads. Other more one-off events, such as the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull in Iceland in April 2010 caused huge disruption to air

travel, with up to 19,000 flights per day being cancelled1, with the resulting economic impact. So how about the railways? In January, icy rain in Germany stopped an Intercity Express train carrying 600 passengers in its tracks for more than 22 hours. This was because the overhead lines were frozen, preventing the

electrified train from onward travel. On the same journey, there was another unintended stop due to frozen points. Some of the passengers spent the freezing cold night on the train, others on makeshift beds in a waiting room, with blankets and food supplied by the German Red Cross2. On 4/5 February and 14 February 2014, the constant barrage of low-pressure weather systems hitting Britain from the Atlantic caused the railway line at Dawlish on the main line between Plymouth and London to close after 100 metres of sea wall washed away, causing substantial stretches of track to fall into the sea. The only rail connection to the Southwest of England was closed for 2 months as a result3. In the UK, where tracks are laid on sleepers and ballast, hot weather can put tracks at risk of buckling, because the steel expands in the

Tracks washed away at Dawlish © Network Rail

month’s rainfall to parts of Cumbria. Further heavy rainfall throughout the month caused major flooding in the North of England, affecting tracks, bridges and viaducts and causing multiple railway lines to close7. In the United States meanwhile, rail services on the east coast were closed during the weekend of 23/24 January 2016 because of near record amounts of snowfall. The tracks had to be de-iced and ploughed before service could resume8. Climate change has been a growing concern for some time. Our climate will see more temperature extremes, increased flooding, sea level rises, increased amounts of rain and snow and more frequent, severe storms. This will put added pressure on our transport system that is already susceptible to being impacted by the weather. It is likely that these impacts will only become more plentiful and severe9.

Flooding at Bridgwater © Network Rail

heat. Measures are undertaken to prevent this, such as including extension joints to allow this process to happen safely. Simple measures such as painting track white also help and fitting track sensors is vital to alert railway staff of such expansion. Trains are either cancelled or slowed as a result, as occurred frequently over the summer of 20154. Indeed, 2015 was the hottest year on record, beating the previous record just a year earlier in 2014. The UK Met Office has estimated 2016 will be at least as warm, if not warmer5. We are therefore set

to see an increase in such delays and economic losses, as well as a need for more investment to prevent catastrophic outcomes such as derailments. Hotter countries with railway lines have to use slab track, for example, where the tracks are laid on to reinforced concrete. This construction measure is four times as expensive6. December 2015 was the wettest on record. In fact, it was the wettest calendar month since records began in 1910. Storm Desmond brought more than a 7

December 2015 saw COP21 – the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change being held in Paris. Its goal was to obtain international agreement to keep global warming to below 2ºC10 and to minimize the extent of climate change. The message here is clear: climate change is happening and our weather patterns will become increasingly erratic and all we can do now is to keep these effects to a minimum by cutting down drastically on greenhouse gases. It was widely recognized that rail travel is the most environmentally friendly form of (powered) transport we have, which is why world leaders from as far away as Mongolia chose to attend the

Snowy tracks in Scotland © Network Rail

conference by train11. As a result, rail travel plays a vital role in our transport needs for the future, moving passengers and freight across the world sustainably. A quarter of the world’s CO2 emissions come from transport, with railways being the lowestemitting form. It is therefore clear that shifting to rail from other forms of transport such as shipping, aviation and road traffic will help with the climate change goals set out by COP21.

However, our railways will have to adapt and become more resilient. Obtaining more and accurate data is a clear factor in successful management. Citing the Climate Change Act, Defra, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, requested reports from key infrastructure providers, including the railways, to assess the risks and solutions posed by climate change. As the examples above suggested, the focus for the rail sector here will

be on flooding of tracks, stations and depots, track bucking and train failure in heat, coastal vulnerabilities and maintenance challenges in ongoing poor weather12. The Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB) has overseen a project entitled Tomorrow’s Railway and Climate Change Adaptation, which looks at how our changing weather patterns will affect British railways, how they can be made safer and more reliable and provide value for money in light of our changing climate. Phase 1 of the project was published in June 2015. Phase 2 of this project will look at how the British rail industry can adapt to more extreme weather and will be published in the spring of 201613. John Dora, Network Rail’s Principal Engineer on Climate Change, said about the study: “Britain’s railway today is resilient to adverse weather but to

Storm damage in Dawlish © Network Rail

safeguard its future we must continue to stay prepared in managing the impact from a changing climate. At Network Rail, we are ahead of the game with a clear climate change adaptation strategy. We are currently working with RSSB in pioneering an impact analysis study and a modelling tool to understand the impact of climate change on the railway. This also means that we are able to start early dialogues and debates with key stakeholders, including the Environment Agency and the Department for Transport, to influence changes that are vital to protect our railway.”14 In October 2015, Transport for London (TfL) issued its second round report on climate change adaptation. It demonstrates that sensible, tangible measures can be taken to allow our railway system to function reliably in the face of extreme weather. For instance, with the increased likelihood of flooding, new flood risk studies need to be conducted and adhered to for new construction projects. Flooding response strategies need to be in place and second nature for when these events strike existing infrastructure. Air-conditioning in the Underground trains can help with heat. Communication with passengers about when to travel is vital. The UK also stands to learn a lot from adopting construction methods and materials used in countries that already experience the weather phenomena the UK is set to experience with greater frequency15. In some cases, more drastic action might have to be taken. In the case of the Dawlish railway line for example, Network Rail has received government backing to look at abandoning the route and moving to an alternative one, after

repair works cost £35m16 and the line remains as vulnerable as ever due to its location. In conclusion, climate change is happening and we need to adapt the way we travel to minimize the effects. Rail travel for both passengers and cargo is the most environmentally-friendly form of transport and its use should be increased. Weather affects the railways in very different ways, 1

requiring individualized responses, big and small. Being able to make intelligent decisions thanks to the availability of data and having the right technology available to prevent problems will allow the railways to adapt from their once Victorian industrial past to the green, sustainable transport option of the future and to cope with the challenges presented to them by a changing climate.

https://www.iata.org/whatwedo/Documents/economics/Volcanic-Ash-Plume-May2010.pdf http://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article150591791/Nach-20-Stunden-im-Intercity-kippt-die-St immung.html 3 http://www.networkrail.co.uk/timetables-and-travel/storm-damage/dawlish/ 4 http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/technology/uk-weather-trains-cancelled-theres-5982432 5 http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2015/global-temperature 6 http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/technology/uk-weather-trains-cancelled-theres-5982432 7 http://www.itv.com/news/2015-12-27/flooding-compounds-travel-woes-across-north-englan d-and-wales/ 8 https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/metro-to-announce-sunday-aft ernoon-whether-it-will-reopen-monday/2016/01/24/76422a4a-c2ab-11e5-a4aa-f25866ba0dc6_story.html 9 http://www.ecy.wa.gov/climatechange/extremeweather_more.htm 10 http://www.cop21.gouv.fr/en/learn/what-is-cop21/the-phenomenon-of-climate-disruption/ 11 http://www.traintoparis.eu/en/ 12 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/changing-climate-changing-infrastructure 13 http://www.rssb.co.uk/Library/about-rssb/2015-06-30-press-release-climate-change.pdf 14 See note 12. 15 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/466603/climate-adrep-tfl-appendix.pdf 16 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-30292756 2

Buckling © Network Rail

COP21 – Copped Out on Transport Why did the ﬁnal agreement of the climate change negotiations of December 2015 make no mention of transport? By Naomi Thompson

While the COP21 Agreement, which was signed on 12 December 2015, has been hailed as a (not very French) revolution against the tyranny of climate change, one glaring issue turned out to be the elephant in the room: transportation.

Train to Paris When world leaders arrived in Paris in trains for COP21 as part of the Train To Paris initiative, it looked like this was going to be a big moment for the railways. All the indicators pointed to it. The industry and stakeholder groups were geared up; UNIFE was on fire, Shift2Rail were out in force, UTIP were on form, Lima-Paris were excited about trains, operators and industry stakeholders were on Twitter to plug their sustainable innovations and the rail industry media was ready to report. Prior to the Summit, dozens of

countries pledged their commitment to focus on lowcarbon modes of urban land transport, with many such as Benin, Turkey, Azerbaijan and UAE delivering detailed plans to develop and promote urban rail infrastructure. Much of South America pledged to develop public transport, while others such as Canada, Guinea, Morocco, New Zealand, South Korea and Bangladesh released plans to improve the energy efficiency of existing fleets.

Transport’s Lack of Prominence In the early days of the Summit, it seemed promising. Transport got a press conference to itself, but the rail industry had to share it with shipping and aviation, the big emitters of the transport industry (3% and 2% of total international carbon emissions respectively).

The press conference on transport was very specifically on modes of transport that need to change, The statistics backed up the expectation that rail would play a and the rail industry is already on significant role in COP21; rail, in its the right track (pun intended), many forms, is the most meaning that commuters and rail environmentally friendly form of freight companies are already transport after canal barges. It was using sustainable technologies to logical – it was expected that travel. So because there was no world leaders would formally need for the rail industry to agree to assist a modal shift towards rail as a primary source of change so much as keep doing transportation for passengers and what it was doing, it didn’t get much of a mention. land freight. 10

The Agreement was signed on Saturday night, and in it there was no mention of transportation. Transportation, which contributes 22.7% of global carbon emissions, which is more than the United States and Russia combined, is not mentioned anywhere in the Agreement. Even electric cars, which received a press conference to themselves, were not mentioned.

long enough. So both industries are looking at innovations to make fossil-fuels more economical, reducing carbon emissions by single-digit percentage points once every five years.

Aviation and Shipping Carbon Emissions

colloquially speaking, no one owns it. If it was acknowledged in the final agreement it might have to belong to nations, and national quotas would rise, making them all the more difficult to reduce in line with the two degrees Celsius ambition.

The other likely reason it wasn’t included in the final Agreement was equally as pragmatic, and equally as political. While the The aviation industry is under the Europeans like trains and invest spotlight for its carbon emissions, heavily in innovations and and has been accordingly technology to make public reducing them with innovations transport an attractive and that reduce their quotas by single sustainable form of transport, as percentage points every five years. does South East Asia and Transportation can be divided into This is, in part, because they are increasingly, Africa, America does four principal forms: automotive, seen flying over the skies of not. rail, shipping and aviation. The civilised countries, they are visible automotive industry is already and ordinary people use them, So many concessions had to be frantically moving away from its and so they are in our made to the U.S. Republican reliance on fossil fuels, with consciousness. But the COP21 innovations in fuel economy and Agreement has not bound them to Senate in this Agreement, some of whom criticised President Barack electric and hybrid cars coming do so. Obama for having travelled all the out all the time, which are promised to be affordable to 30% Shipping, on the other hand, is not way to France to have a chat about the weather, and it seems of road users within the next 15 in the public consciousness and likely that transport was one of years. The rail industry is also therefore has little incentive to them. They trade with Europe, leading the way in reduce its carbon emissions. It Asia and Africa and that means environmentally sustainable happens out at sea where most shipping and aviation are innovations. people never see it. Despite it necessary evils, and in order to being a relatively low-carbon (by avoid mentioning them, electric The aviation and shipping weight of goods per kilometre) industries, however, are yet to form of transport, it still accounts cars and high-speed rail, those potentially planet-saving modes of catch up. Biofuel is the only for around 3% of global realistic alternative to fossil fuels greenhouse gas emissions, which transportation, were also left out of the final draft. for both, but biofuels come with have increased by 70% in the last their own set of problems – in a 25 years and will rise by a world where a billion people face projected 50–250% by 2055 if left In 2008, Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, food insecurity every day, giving unchecked. This will account for a Chair of the UN’s over fertile land to grow biofuels Intergovernmental Panel on 5% share of global emissions. could create further food Climate Change, said: shortages, and create a brand new “The shipping industry has so far kind of localised ecological escaped publicity. It has been left instability. out of the climate change discussion. I hope [shipping The other alternatives are nuclear emissions] will be included in the power and electric batteries, but next UN agreement. It would be a However, because shipping and the former is unpopular with cop-out if it was not. It tells me aviation occur offshore, they passengers and could potentially that we have been ineffective at aren’t included in any national fall into the wrong hands at sea. The latter are heavy and don’t last quotas of emissions. Therefore, tackling climate change so far.”

Transportation – Aviation and Shipping

Aviation and Shipping Do Not Belong

neutral of any form of transportation. As such, the rail Freight transport is soon to freight industry is concentrating overtake passenger transport. It on improving the cost currently makes up 40% of global competitiveness and the reliability transportation with that set to rise of freight services. While it can in the near future. Innovations in compete with road freight, and is telecommunications mean there is doing so with European freight less need to transport people; stakeholders pledging to shift 30% video conferencing and of road freight to rail by 2030, and instantaneous communication of 50% by 2050, it cannot ship items information and bulky paperwork over water. via the internet mean that there are not many occasions when anyone has to actually attend in person. The mood of the COP21 was Freight is therefore key, and rail is optimistic, and remains so. World a powerful player in the freight and industry leaders are now solutions-orientated, looking at industry, and closest to carbon

Freight Emissions

COP21 Solutions

what can be done to meet the new targets. Of course, rail will play a huge part in the future of transportation precisely because it is environmentally friendly and getting more so every day. Modal shifts will be encouraged by signatories of the Agreement as lines are electrified and innovations make it on to the tracks. But it seems unfair that this wasnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t explicitly said in the Agreement. It could have championed rail as an ideal alternative to aviation and shipping, and yet it did not. While world leaders might have taken the train to Paris, it looks like they all flew home.

! ! "#$%"& #'#()*( "+*, "#$%"& #'#()*( "+*, -,'* -".'/ -,'* -".'/ &(+*0( &(+*0(

! " ! # ! $ !! " ! # ! $ % % & & ' $ ' $ ( % ( % %) % ) * * + # # , $ + # # , $ % - ) ! . / # % - )

! . / # ' # ' # 0 0 0 0 # $ # $ 1 " # 2 1 " # 2 # # ' 3 ' 3

Lengthening the Rail Life Cycle Given the immense stresses rails are put under constantly in all weathers, what can be done to improve their life cycle? An immense amount of pressure, often every few minutes and in all weathers: rails have to withstand a lot. Reliable and perfectly coordinated maintenance and repair measures enable greater Safety comes first on the tracks. economy, travel comfort, safety This necessitates the thorough and a longer life cycle for rails. removal of any damage to switches caused during operation on underground networks, tramways, light rail and mainline networks. The switches and especially the frogs are reliably reconditioned using the proven process of arc welding in connection with specially developed materials, whereby repeated reconditioning is possible.

Welding to recondition switches

The timely use of welding to recondition switches makes it possible to increase operational safety, lengthen the service life of the switches and wheels, reduce the life cycle costs of the switch, avoid operational disruptions and simultaneously reduce side wear of the rails, noise emissions and rail corrugation. 13

Thermit速 Head Repair In order to ensure the operational track is in the best-possible condition, preventive maintenance according to the condition of the track is absolutely essential. This leads to a reduction in life cycle costs and guarantees safety. Locally limited rail defects such as head checks, squats or breaks are individual defects in the rail head which do not extend over a long section of track. Depending on the form of the defect, it may be necessary to cut out the affected

Thermit速 Head Repair

sections and fit replacement rails. In many cases, however, welding can also be used to carry out the repair without the more expensive solution of replacing rails. Our aluminothermic repair welding process Thermit® Head Repair (THR) provides a highquality, economical alternative to conventional arc welding. THR draws on more than one hundred years of proven Thermit® technology, which has been successfully implemented for many decades for the continuous welding of rails. In comparison to arc welding, the decisive advantages of the Thermit® Head Repair are its easy application, which enables repair welds with a high process reliability and excellent quality. The Thermit® Head Repair process can be used with different rail profiles and is suitable for use with new and worn rails.

sections of track. Mobile work units carry out welding work on laid track and switches. The area of arc welding includes the maintenance of curved stretches of track and wheel-bearing track sections subject to heavy wear. This requires a considerable amount of welding work to recondition the switches, and the frogs in particular, and also to repair operationally-related rail damage. Afterwards, special machines are used to process the welded rails and recreate their original profile or wear profile according to customer requirements.

Conditioning of new rails

prevent corrugation in the longterm and avoid noise, whereby the running surface and gauge corner are milled out and welded on fixed installations. A filler metal is used here which is largely resistant to deformation caused by the wheel. The special material ETEKA5 is characterized by a strength of 480 HB and despite this has an extremely low surface roughness of less than 6 μm. A wear test with Public transportation networks have over 40,000 rolling actions at the special requirements regarding system engineering centre of the railway infrastructure. Tight curves German railways at Kirchmöser (in with a radius of, at times, Germany) confirmed that the considerably less than 80 m cause solution reduces rail wear by 85% heavy wear on rail running edges and reduces wheel wear by 95% and wheels. Screeching on curves is compared to rails with the quality annoying for local residents and The maintenance of rails and classification R200. requires appropriate measures to switches is one of the most reduce the noise level. Heavy wear Conditioned rails which are important preventive measures on grooved rail switches (flat against heavy wear caused by simultaneously welded on the grooves, gauge face, gauge corner) running surface and side to prevent permanent strain. Professional leads to increased maintenance maintenance sustainably rail wear have a longer life cycle, lengthens the life cycle of rails and costs. Replacing rails is much more lower maintenance costs and lower expensive than conditioning the switches and lowers noise noise emissions. And last but not open superstructure. emissions from wheel-to-rail least they make rail travel more New rails are conditioned to contact, especially on curved comfortable and safer overall.

Conditioning of new rails

Track maintenance

CONTACT: Goldschmidt Thermit GmbH Finance and Management Holding of Goldschmidt Thermit Group Hugo-Licht-Strasse 3 04109 Leipzig, Germany Phone: +49 (0)341 355918-0 Fax: +49 (0)341 355918-99 info@goldschmidt-thermit.com www.goldschmidt-thermit.com

Track maintenance

INNOVATION THROUGH TRADITION In 1895 Prof. Goldschmidt invented the Thermit® process for the continuous welding of railway tracks and today we continue to remain committed to this spirit of innovation and develop products and services to make railway tracks as comfortable and safe as possible for your customers. We oﬀer a unique range of services for the construction, repair, maintenance and renovation of track systems. You beneﬁt from the power of our global group with more than 20 companies and numerous partners around the world.

Reliable, on track performance in extreme environments

Solutions engineered for extreme conditions, that meet industry & international standards

Parker’s P arker’s Xtreme Xtreme solutions solutions enable enable its its rail rail industry industr y partners par tners to to reduce reduce maintenance maintenance ccosts osts a nd enhance enhance the the life life cycles cycles of of both both equipment equipment and and vehicles...even vehicles...even in in the the most most and ex treme environments. environments. extreme C ould you you beneﬁt beneﬁt ffrom rom w orking w ith P arker’s dedicated dedicated ttransportation ranspor tation team; team; ready ready Could working with Parker’s tto o rrespond espond tto o yyour our p erformance, a pplication, ccost, ost, w eight a nd sspace pace cchallenges? hallenges? performance, application, weight and

rrail@parker.com ail@parkerr.c . om

3 Ways to Achieve Reliable Pneumatic Performance in Extreme Operating Conditions Dave Walker outlines some key considerations when selecting pneumatic solutions for extreme environments. Extreme operating conditions bring a varied range of challenges for rail operators when keeping their components and systems active. Selecting components designed to

deliver in difficult conditions can maximize productivity. Dave Walker, Parker Hannifinâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Market Development Manager for the rail industry, outlines some key

considerations when selecting pneumatic solutions for extreme environments. Railway vehicles are expected to operate constantly and reliably whilst fulfilling the high demands for minimal life cycle costs, often in some of the most challenging conditions. It is crucial that these vehicles withstand extreme temperatures and attacks from aggressive contaminants as well as endure severe shock and vibration. It is a fundamental design prerequisite to ensure the engineering technology selected is robust and dependable and delivers long lasting reliability. With extremes of weather come extreme challenges, from ice forming on rail vehicles to equipment contamination from dirt; all of which contribute to unnecessary friction and an increase in the power required to deliver motion control. The correct selection of pneumatic equipment by vehicle manufacturers can significantly improve performance.

1. Sealing technology specified to extreme temperatures The specification of products designed especially for use in extreme environments is key, particularly as these products feature seal technology that can withstand temperature extremes whilst retaining operational performance. The ability of seal materials to recover and maintain material characteristics, allowing them to provide effective sealing over a wide temperature range, and ensuring that all elements in the construction of the product can achieve ultimate performance should be key considerations during the product design process. An excellent example of this is the Parker Xtreme range of body ported valves: a standard product range that can still deliver results in temperatures from +60°C down as low as -40°C. These hard-wearing valves have also successfully passed in-service “winterisation” tests, which demonstrated the valves’ effective operation when rapid temperature changes were applied in order to simulate the kind of thermal shocks that occur upon entering and leaving tunnels in cold environments. The valve design of the Xtreme range features an over-moulded single piece spool, resulting in fewer moving parts and, with a short spool movement, provides outstanding extreme temperature performance with high reliability. Complementing the Viking Xtreme valves, Parker offers the P1DXtreme range of cylinders which, along with adhering to ISO15552,

demonstrate a proven capability from -40°C up to +150°C. Combining the most sought-after features of seal technology, these low-temperature pneumatic cylinders deliver high reliability, low leakage and long service life. The seals are specifically engineered for low temperatures and designed for optimal performance when operating at -40°C to +80°C as the material retains its elastic properties even at extremely low temperatures. Available as standard production units, these extreme cylinders and valves are suitable for various applications and are readily available for maintenance or for direct replacement of existing components. With the population of skilled maintenance technicians declining, those remaining need componentry that is easy to understand and readily available. Having straightforward and modular solenoid valves and air 18

cylinders helps make replacements an easy plug-in process.

2. Operating performance matched to extreme environment requirements Temperature may be one of the most recognized and talked about issues when considering extreme operating conditions. However there are other factors in the operating environment that can have devastating effects on performance and reliability and, if not considered and acted upon, can severely compromise life cycle cost. Spikes in power supply Solenoids such as Parker’s Xtreme valves have a wide voltage tolerance to provide continued

reliable performance across typically +/- 30% of nominal voltage. This negates the need (and costs) for protected power supplies. Attacks from the environment Valve bodies need to be anodized and have passed aggressive salt spray testing. Parker’s Viking valves are made entirely of anodized aluminium for good corrosion resistance. The smooth design, with no dirt-collecting pockets, makes the valve suitable for most environments. The valve has stainless steel fixing screws for the end covers to withstand aggressive environments. Shock and vibration due to vehicle dynamic movements Parker’s Viking Xtreme valves are tested and approved to meet the required standards for shock and vibration: IEC6173: 1999 Cat 1 Class B

3. Specify components and systems approved for use in the rail industry

with the capability to provide air to NF F11-100 Air Quality Standards.

In conclusion, the selection of the most appropriate pneumatic components contributes to a reduction in required maintenance activity and enhances the life cycle costs of both equipment and There are many components vehicles. When considering the available in the global marketplace. best solution, utilising a complete However, it is important to ensure system approach – from air that they are suitable for the rigors treatment through to components of the rail industry as opposed to designed for extreme environments general industrial use and that have – promotes long and reliable been subjected to approval to the performance from each of the required industry standards. system elements. Choosing from the Parker range offers the Of course pneumatic product additional significant benefits of the performance in extreme availability of standard component environmental conditions is also ranges that can be integrated into dependent on the quality of air existing systems and, of course, the being supplied. It should come as peace of mind that comes from no surprise then that Parker also partnering with a reputable supplies class leading air filtration, company with a proven track as well as complete filtration and dryer packages for the rail industry, record. 19

Parker Hannifin is a global manufacturer offering an extensive range of robust and durable pneumatic, fluidic and electromechanical motion control solutions. With proven expertise, and more than 40 years’ experience supplying solutions to the railway industry, Parker provides customers with a wealth of product and application knowledge. Could you benefit from working with Parker’s dedicated transportation team that is ready to respond to your performance, application, cost, weight and space challenges? Contact us to discuss your solution needs on rail@parker.com.

“New efforts are essential…” – Rail, Metro and the Terrorist Threat and airlines), limiting access to platforms for ticket holders only and employing security checks similar to those employed at major public venues or events.

allows anyone to capture suspicious activity as a photo or written note and send the information to the New York State Intelligence Center. From there, the tip will be reviewed and, if On 23 November, New York relevant, sent to the appropriate Governor Andrew M. Cuomo law enforcement agency. By using announced two new efforts to the app, which can be enhance the New York State's downloaded for free for iPhone ability to fight terrorism. ‘These and Android phone users, there is new efforts are essential pieces in no worry about who to send the our fight against terrorism,’ tip to or what phone number to Governor Cuomo said, stating that call – users can simply send a ‘We have stepped up our photo of the suspicious activity preparedness in the aftermath of using their device’s camera, by the Paris attacks, and we continue choosing a photo from its library, to remain vigilant against those or sending a written note. It also who seek to spread fear and includes information on what to violence…’ look for and when to report suspicious activity. The service is In France, which saw in August a The new 'See Something, Send already available in Colorado, failed attack on the AmsterdamSomething' campaign encourages Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Brussels-Paris Thalys train, and the New Yorkers to report suspicious Virginia. horrific events in Paris of 13 activity through a simple mobile November, a number of measures app on their smart phone. And the The 46 new MTA police officers have been outlined to improve Metropolitan Transportation will staff counterterrorism surge security at stations. New Authority will hire 46 more police assignments at Grand Central and equipment to enable passengers officers to increase Penn Station, as well as other and their luggage to be scanned counterterrorism capabilities at deployments to ensure the prior to boarding Thalys services Grand Central Terminal, Penn traveling public is protected in the in Paris and Lille have been Station and throughout the MTA network. The officers are installed. Other measures mooted Metro-North Railroad, Long Island included in the MTA's 2016 Final by Minister Ségolène, whose Proposed Budget and will have an Rail Road and Staten Island portfolio includes transport, could Railway systems. impact of approximately $3 include the introduction of named million. All members of the MTA tickets (as required by Eurostar 'See Something, Send Something' Police Department have been If further proof was even needed, the past year, and its wave of succession of terrorist incidents have brought security on our transport networks into sharp focus. Following each attack there have been calls for changes to the existing security practices. But realistically, a railway or metro system could not deploy airportstyle security checks without causing huge changes to both station usage and passenger behaviour, to make no mention of the costs. Instead, a number of other changes are being made around the world. This article takes a look at some of the global rail and metro responses to the increased security challenge.

trained in techniques to counter active shooters, such as those who have been implicated in recent terrorist attacks elsewhere in the world. Rather than wait for heavily armed Emergency Service Unit teams to arrive, officers are taught to immediately engage, pin down and neutralize any potential threat in order to minimize casualties. In Washington, the Metro Transit Police Department announced that it continues to co-ordinate with its federal law enforcement partners and has taken the following steps in response to the Paris attacks: increased patrols across the network, additional canine sweeps, the MTPD has more than 20 canine teams in service conducting security sweeps in and around rail stations and other critical infrastructure and expanded random explosives screening at station entrances. Any bag or package carried on to the system may be subject to screening by MTPD officers. Although the MTPD is keen to stress that the screening process is ‘non-invasive,’ meaning the bag or package is not opened unless follow-up investigation is required.

the chief of the subway security said that the intelligence has compelled the Metro to strengthen security measures and to work on transport security and anti-terrorist protection. Security personnel numbers have been increased as have the number of passenger inspections. Earlier in 2015 the Russian Ministry of Transport announced that all the stations of the Moscow Metro should be equipped with the passenger inspection zones by 2017. The first security apparatus has already been deployed at Dobryninskaya Station and includes metal detectors, and Xrays for screening passengers and baggage. Sensors to detect radioactive and other hazardous substances will also be mounted in the entrance doors of stations.

Eurostar’s London to Paris employs airport-style checks and always has, a line that cuts through multiple countries and stations would find this more difficult. Would every station from which an international journey can begin need a security check and passport control? And if security checks began on international journeys, would that make national trips without such measures more vulnerable?

Industry View: No public place can ever be 100% secure and a fine balance has to be employed that can increase security, but not add onerous levels of time-consuming and obstructive security checks. People are used to arriving two hours early for a flight, but people don’t fly twice a day, five days a week, which is how they use rail. The terrorist acts in Europe, That’s simply a non-starter. So it occurring at a time when might fall to technology to offer increasing numbers of refugees solutions – facial recognition from the Middle East and Africa software for CCTV already exists are seeking safety in the EU, have and cameras can also detect reignited a debate in the 24 ‘suspicious activity’ such as European countries that make up unattended bags. But there are no the Schengen Area, where there is easy answers and hard choices no passport control at the remain ahead in increasing borders, and it seems likely that security within rail and metro border checks will soon be infrastructure as well as in our reinstated. This is likely to hamper wider world. plans to develop further EuropeThe Moscow Metro has also strengthened security measure as wide rail transport and a single rail By Luke Upton Russia has become more actively market. Whilst a direct Printed with permission from Global Transport Forum. involved in Syria. Vladimir Muratov, international line, like the

“

Christian Schang, Director of Projects, SNCF: The merging of the former Infrastructure manager and SNCF Infra last year offers a huge change for the national network. The adding and sharing of tools creates huge potential. But we always have to consider that innovation is required everywhere within a railway system to achieve our future targets.” 21

Cyber Security Threats to Public Transport A closer look at ENISA’s Cyber Security and Resilience of Intelligent Public Transport report. By Josephine Cordero Sapién Since the creation of the internet in the late 20th century and the availability of this technology on portable platforms, it has entered virtually all aspects of our lives, informing us at home, at work and on the go, entertaining us, making our lives easier and more convenient and introducing us to whole new ways of communicating and behaving. However, this technology also leaves us vulnerable to threats, on the smaller scale, such as identity theft and online fraud to largescale cyber-attacks. We now live in a world where security hacks have become so large-scale, they are being termed ‘megabreaches’, with the average cost of a data breach now at US$3.79million, according to the MIT Technology Review1. And these attacks are not just carried out by individuals, but also by countries. Individuals, companies and countries are all on the victim list.

JP Morgan Chase was hacked by individuals in July 2014, while North Korea hacked Sony Pictures Entertainment in November 2014. In June 2015 the U.S. Office of Personnel Management was breached by individuals in China suspected of being affiliated with the government2. These breaches all involved the theft of things like names, emails, addresses and phone numbers and the costs to combat these attacks are astronomical. But what if the costs are much more serious than money? The ability to undermine another country’s critical infrastructure is a massive threat. We are already well aware of terrorist attacks on our transport systems. The July 2005 bombings on the London Underground and the 2004 Madrid train bombings are just two examples. As we have embraced Intelligent Public Transport, our transport 22

infrastructure has an additional area of vulnerability. It is therefore vital that we learn how we can be as resilient to such cyber-attacks as possible. Imperial College London has just announced that two research teams will collaborate with colleagues from Singapore on a three-year project to research the resilience of the UK’s infrastructure from cyber-attacks and how data can be shared safely3. The European Union Agency for Network and Information Security, ENISA, published a report entitled Cyber Security and Resilience of Intelligent Public Transport in January 20164. This article will look at that study in more detail. Intelligent Public Transport integrates ICT systems to optimise transport services. This opens public transport to cyber threats. As the authors of the study, Dr.

system is open to attack in both established and new ways and that this poses real risks to society. There are, furthermore, barriers in place that impede advancement in protecting against these threats. As part of the report, the authors However, they have identified undertook a survey, during which • Unintentional damage seven threat categories6: they found that “transport organisations still do not grant the • Physical and large-scale attacks, • Insider threats necessary importance to cyber “which aim to achieve The authors note that these security within their company. maximum distraction, threats open up intelligent public Spending on cyber security also disruption, destruction, transport to vulnerabilities that all appears to be inadequate in exposure, alteration, theft or IT systems share. The scale and response to the range of unauthorised accessing of complexity of our public transport 7 multifaceted cyber threats assets” . The threats in this system is immense, making it affecting IPT”12. category come from terrorism, difficult to manage these threats. violence, shootings, IPT has to cope with multiple They found that only 20% of unauthorized access and the interdependent systems and is theft of data and/or dependent on access to real-time operators spend money on cyber security and of those 20%, half infrastructure and can affect data10. It is this combination of transportation safety and spent less than 2% of their budget threats and vulnerabilities that security as well as traffic and on this area, while the other half produces risks for our public vehicle management8. did not know13. transport system. On a societal level, if these threats are carried • Acts of nature and/or Dr. Lévy-Bencheton and Ms. Darra out, it could mean the Intelligent environmental incidents Public Transport services become put forward recommendations for • Accidental errors, malfunctions, unavailable, which in turn leads to operators. Operators should conduct risk assessment that failures a disruption of society. looks at cyber and information Alternatively, passengers’ health • Disruption and/or outages security on a regular basis. The and safety are put at risk and appropriate physical security members of society see their • Nefarious activities and/or measures, such as locks and CCTV privacy being eroded, as more abuse (cyber attacks): data systems, should be installed. At tracking and real-time behaviour breaches, identity theft, the same time operators must evaluation come into play11. malware and viruses, falsification of records, It is clear that our public transport keep their digital access to networks and data secure, by means of firewall, passwords etc. Operators further need to use encryption and create private communication networks. It is vital that operators can deactivate their assets remotely, in the event of stolen assets for example. Finally, it is important for operators to allow their systems to continue functioning at a minimal but critical level14. Cédric Lévy-Bencheton and Ms. Eleni Darra, note there is not yet an EU policy on cyber security for transport and it is difficult for operators to allocate budgets to address this threat5.

wiretapping / eavesdropping, abuse of information leakages and the hacking of wireless, connected assets, which again impacts transportation safety and security as well as traffic and vehicle management9.

The authors put forward several recommendations for both decision makers and transport operators.

All images courtesy of Christiaan Colen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

Decision makers15:

Transport operators16:

• “EC and MS institutions should promote public/private collaboration on IPT cyber security at national level and EU-wide

• “IPT operators should integrate cyber security in their corporate governance

• EC institutions and agencies should promote and facilitate the development of a common EU approach to IPT security • EC institutions and agencies should develop a comprehensive EU strategy and framework for cyber security in IPT

• IPT operators should develop and implement an integrated corporate strategy addressing holistically cyber security and safety risks • IPT operators should implement risk management for cyber security in multistakeholder environments including external contractors and dependencies

• EC and MS should integrate and • IPT operators should clearly converge security efforts made and routinely specify their in other sectors of activity cyber security requirements • EC and MS should foster the development of harmonised cyber security standards for IPT”

• IPT operators should annually review organisational cyber security processes, practices and infrastructures”

We are all aware of the traditional threats to our transport system and the huge impacts such events have on our citizens and our infrastructure. And we have seen the vast impact cyber attacks can have on corporations and nations. When these two threats are combined, the potential for harm is momentous. This article is intended to raise awareness of this threat to our public transport system in general as well as our railways more specifically. Operators can learn what measures to take before, during and after an attack to minimize the risk of one occurring or the impact of one in the event of an attack taking place. In addition, governmental guidelines and policies would send a strong message that the cyber security of our public transport infrastructure is of fundamental importance in our increasingly digital world.

If you are interested in further reading about cyber security and the threats, vulnerabilities and good practices to our transport infrastructure, we suggest: • The Future of Smart Cities: Cyber-Physical Infrastructure Risk, published by the U.S. Department for Homeland Security in August 2015: https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/documents/OCIA%20%20The%20Future%20of%20Smart%20Cities%20-%20Cyber-Physical%20Infrastructure%20Risk.pdf • Cyber Security for Smart Cities – an Architecture Model for Public Transport, published by ENISA in December 2015, link available here: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/Resilience-andCIIP/smart-infrastructures/intelligent-public-transport/smart-cities-architecture-model cert.gov/sites/default/files/documents/OCIA%20-%20The%20Future%20of%20Smart%20Cities%20%20Cyber-Physical%20Infrastructure%20Risk.pdf • Cyber Security for Smart Cities – an Architecture Model for Public Transport, published by ENISA in December 2015, link available here: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/Resilience-andCIIP/smart-infrastructures/intelligent-public-transport/smart-cities-architecture-model 1

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/545616/cybersecurity-the-age-of-the-megabreach/ See note 1. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/newssummary/news_27-1-2016-12-47-46 4 https://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/Resilience-and-CIIP/smart-infrastructures/intelligent-public-transport/good-practices-recommendations 5 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, Cyber Security and Resilience of Intelligent Public Transport, published by ENISA, December 2015, p.7. Available from: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/Resilience-and-CIIP/smart-infrastructures/intelligent-public-transport/good-practices-recommendations 6 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, p22 7 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, p22 8 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, p24 9 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, p24 10 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, p27 11 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, pp30–31 12 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, p31 13 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, p31 14 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, pp35–36 15 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, pp44–45 16 C. Lévy-Bencheton and E. Darra, op. cit. 5, pp45–46 2 3

Zetica: The RASC Pod – Rethinking Trackbed Inspection Part 1 of this two-part feature looks at the improved return on investment for inspection and enhanced track safety. Traditional approaches to track inspection focus on track geometry measurements carried out on dedicated inspection trains or hy-rail vehicles. Track geometry measurements can detect unstable track and prompt slow orders to mitigate the risk of a derailment. However, track geometry measurements in themselves cannot determine the root cause of unstable track, so the time to fix problem track may be delayed while this is investigated. Derailments can also occur on track without a measureable track geometry fault.

Specialist measurement trains are expensive and require a dedicated path to be assigned on revenueearning lines. The cost of planning a survey, occupying track and manning the train is high. The RASC® Pod is an innovative trackbed inspection solution that has the potential to improve: • the return on investment in data capture systems • track safety • the cost-effectiveness of follow-on maintenance

The system illustrated below is a versatile platform that can be mounted on a wagon in conjunction with a revenueearning train (above left) or on the chassis of a hy-rail (above right). The RASC® Pod offers exceptional flexibility with a range of above and below-ground measurement systems linked to a core of onboard power, data management, accurate location and climate control systems. The pod is deployable wirelessly; data is captured autonomously and can be monitored remotely.

The unified data stream allows integration of above and belowground information to determine the root cause of problem track (fix problems first time), flag derailment risk areas and reduce the cost of maintenance. This article describes the potential improvement in return on investment (ROI) for inspection and enhanced track safety.

The RASC® Pods are distributed across 3 routes and are controlled centrally with a schedule to repeat scan each route during periods 1–3 whilst mounted in conjunction with in-service trains. Multiple RASC® Pods can be deployed for the cost of a single inspection train so the improved ROI for inspection is in better coverage, less impact on revenue-earning traffic and less manpower. The RASC® Pod weighs less than three tons and can easily be deployed where it is needed on any flat bed. This is beneficial where sections of track require a survey, for example, following heavy rain (to identify the risk of washouts) or after maintenance (quality control).

A future article will cover the use of the combined data for improved trackbed maintenance planning.

Improvement in the ROI for inspection The RASC® Pod can simultaneously collect data from track geometry, rail profile, linescan imaging, 2D and 3D highspeed lasers, accelerometers, video, 2D and 3D groundpenetrating radar (GPR), thermal imaging and catenary inspection systems.

Enhancing track safety Track geometry measures changes in the relative position of running rails, which can be affected by above and below-ground influences. Values in excess of predetermined safety margins are flagged for maintenance and, depending on the severity, could result in slow orders, which limit the speed of revenue-earning traffic over unstable track.

The illustration below depicts the deployment of a dedicated Track geometry in itself cannot verify the root cause of unstable track inspection train (left) and 3no. so the time to fix problem track can be delayed. RASC Pods (right) on a hypothetical network consisting of The RASC® Pod has autonomous solutions for extracting above and 3 routes. below-ground data streams targeted on track geometry exceptions. Combining these measurements speeds up the determination of the The inspection train has a 5-man root cause of track geometry faults and can lead to the problem being crew and a schedule to survey repaired correctly first time. The benefits are reduced delay times and each one of the 3 routes once a decrease in costly revisits, which translate into improved train between periods 1–3. The speeds. inspection train requires forward planning to determine a path and minimise the impact on revenue- A useful analogy for this collective approach is an iceberg where track earning trains. geometry and visual measurements represent just the top of the 26

trackbed structure (below left) and combined above and belowground measurements more fully describe the whole trackbed (below right).

Profile: Zetica Ltd is an experienced service provider offering an integrated above and belowground measurement solution for trackbed inspection that offers the following benefits:

• Identification of subgrade erosion as well as drainage and ballast fouling issues which could affect track stability and explain track geometry Derailments can occur on track without a measureable track geometry fault or where incorrect maintenance was applied due to incomplete exceptions knowledge of the cause. • Provision of a system to target trackbed maintenance Examples are provided below where prior knowledge of the beloweffectively using evidenceground condition of the track could have helped prevent a derailment based information, thus event. reducing wasted time and resources unnecessarily maintaining track where this is not needed • Reduction of material costs by optimising ballast cleaning and trackbed rehabilitation programmes

UK: Cause of cyclic top condition which caused derailment (shallow formation) was not addressed.

USA: Failed formation at a road crossing shown by GPR measurement. There were no recorded track geometry exceptions leading up to the derailment event (broken rails).

• Provision of an effective means of quality controlling newbuild trackbed or recently maintained trackbed to verify the work carried out • Update of above-ground asset mapping information

Australia: Undetected weakness in the track formation. Dip in track and adverse twist caused bogie to derail.

In 2015 the RASC® Pod received vehicle acceptance certification for carrying out work on the UK rail network.

Measurement of both above and below-ground trackbed attributes using the RASC® Pod can help to better characterise irregular trackbed that may require closer inspection and enhance track safety. Part 2 will deal with integrating data for improved maintenance planning.

More details are available at www.zeticarail.com 27

Multi-Contact Invests in a Modern Testing Laboratory for Railway Technology Components In 2015, the connector manufacturer Multi-Contact opened the doors to its new testing laboratory at the company’s centre for railway technology in Hésingue, France. The highlight of the modern laboratory, which covers an area of 800 square metres, is a test bench for testing shock and vibration in combination with thermal stress. In addition, the laboratory is also equipped with a salt spray chamber, which allows Multi-Contact to simulate the effects of the environment on exposed connectors that are installed in railway rolling stock systems in a realistic manner. The electrical testing equipment makes it possible for MultiContact to perform tests in-house with an applied current of up to 3000 A, or for partial discharges, of up to 100 kV. “This investment allows us to subject our products to a wide range of tests, many that even exceed the requirements laid out in testing standards,” explains Michel Schmitt, head of the Railway Technology Market at Multi-Contact. “The goal of all of this testing is to develop products that are even more compact, more powerful and more durable.” With over 40 years’ experience in

the railway technology sector, Multi-Contact places its focus squarely on its modular connector systems. “In carriages and locomotives, we need solutions to reduce the time required for maintenance and repair work. Interfaces must be able to be connected and disconnected extremely quickly in order to prevent extended downtimes or train cancellation, for example,” Schmitt continued. Multi-Contact sees itself as a development partner for the industry. Its expertise in a wide range of areas is also tied in with the railway industry and allows the company to develop interface solutions that are perfectly

tailored to the application in question. The patented MULTILAM is at the heart of the MC product range. This contact technology ensures efficient energy transfer with low performance loss and thus a long product service life. Thanks to their compact, modular design, the power connectors from the MPC series are ideal for creating solutions for railway rolling stock. Modular Power Connectors allow engineers to create connections easily and safely for inter-car couplings, traction converters, inverters and batteries on the roof and under carriages, as well as to traction motors.

Crossing London A detailed look at the Crossrail project being built in and under London right now.

By Naomi Thompson

The project will connect Shenfield in Essex with Reading in Berkshire. Construction began in 2008, and is scheduled to be fully operational in 2019. In November 2015, it was announced that the The figures alone are staggering – surface works were half-way completed, on schedule, £14.8billion budget; 117km of track; 42km of tunnels up to 40m preparing the existing rail network below ground; 30 refitted stations for Crossrail’s opening. and 10 new ones; 200–240m trains; 10,000 employees (5,000 of whom have received their training at the Tunnelling and Underground Construction Academy, a college purpose-built London is one of the busiest cities especially for this project); 8 in Europe – its transport tunnelling machines boring an infrastructure is of vital average 38m a day. importance to the UK economy, The largest infrastructure project in Europe is taking place beneath the streets of London, while above ground it is barely noticed but hotly anticipated.

The Necessity of Crossrail

Final Crossrail TBM tunnelling progress map June 2015 © Crossrail

and trains are the arteries of that infrastructure. Of the 1.17 million people who travel in London in the morning rush hour, 526,000 use trains, and 246,000 of them transferred to the London Underground or DLR services (light rail). The population of the city is expected to reach 10 million by 2030, by which time the transport infrastructure, without Crossrail, would be woefully inadequate. Crossrail will increase the city’s rail transport capacity by up to 10% and bring an additional 1.5 million people within commuting distance to Central London. This

Multi-purpose gantry lifting sleepers into place in Thames Tunnel © Crossrail

in turn will allow up to 30,000 new jobs in the capital within a decade of opening, sustaining the growth of the UK economy.

Tunnelling The logistics of the project have been impressive. Five Atkinsdesigned twin bore tunnels, each 6m in diameter required eight 1,000-tonne tunnelling machines, the last of which, Victoria, was dismantled beneath the surface in August 2015 to be removed and recycled. The tunnelling itself began in the summer of 2012 and was completed in June 2015. This would have been impressive in any environment, but was more so because the ground beneath London is not empty space; it is a hive of underground lines and stations, catacombs, sewers, rivers

and even a few deep air raid shelters. At Tottenham Court Road there is a point known as “the eye of the needle” – a 7m space between the Northern Line tunnel and an escalator, which had to be navigated.

Track Construction Much of Crossrail’s track will be built especially for it, with tracks running in parallel to existing mainline lines. Balfour Beatty were contracted to construct sections of the track, the most notable of which runs from Abbey Wood to the Plumstead portal, providing access to the new tunnels. The tracks themselves will be 1.435mm standard gauge so that they are compatible with the existing mainline tracks. They will have a 25kV 50Hz AC overhead 31

power line, some of which will be installed on to the mainline, e.g. sections between Reading and Heathrow, as part of the project. The trains will run at up to 160km/h overland, and 100km/h underground.

Responsible and Sustainable Construction The tunnelling process uncovered significant archaeological finds dating back 2000 years, the most notable of which was the excavation of 3,000 skeletons from beneath Liverpool Street Station dating from the Great Plague in 1665. The 10,000 artefacts unearthed by the works will be provided to the Museum of London for archive and display. With 4,500 buildings potentially

Crossrail Liverpool Street archaeology © Crossrai

affected by the tunnelling (of which 250 are historically listed), it was often delicate work, but required the demolition of only one listed building. Even the earth removed from the tunnelling

works was transported to Wallasea Island which will become a new wildlife sanctuary. Every effort was made to ensure that the project was and is as sustainable as possible.

Rolling Stock The rolling stock for Crossrail, the bespoke designed Bombardier 345s, will have capacity for 1,500 passengers. The trains will be 200m long and will sport wide, interconnecting gangways with three double doors on each side of every carriage. Cutting-edge technology will deliver on-board passenger information systems and real-time travel information. The trains will have on-train energy management systems, which will control air-conditioning and lighting, and will re-generate energy back into the supply during braking. They will be lightweight and constructed using cuttingedge, energy-efficient methods.

Suspected 1665 Great Plague pit unearthed at Crossrail Liverpool Street site © Crossrail

The trains, made in conjunction with TfL in the final design phase, 32

will be manufactured at Bombardier’s UK plant at Derby. The first trains will be delivered in May 2017. The manufacture and delivery will sustain 760 UK manufacturing jobs and 80 apprenticeships. Approximately three quarters of the contract spend will remain in the UK. The construction of the trains hit an important milestone in November 2015 with the completion of the first test carriage, which will be used to perfect the final design and manufacturing technique. 66 Crossrail trains will be delivered in total, which translates to a total of 594 carriages. The roll-out will begin in 2017 at London Liverpool Street, and by 2019 will run full services.

Signalling The signalling will be supplied by Signalling Solutions Ltd (SSL), Alstom's UK signalling joint venture with Balfour Beatty, now solely owned by Alstom, which was awarded a €54 million contract in March 2015 to design, manufacture, supply, install, test and commission the signalling control system for the line. The

Final Crossrail TBM Victoria's cutterhead dismantled © Crossrail

signalling system will use Alstom's Smartlock interlocking technology and ECTS 2, with cab-based display and information management systems.

platforms to accommodate the long trains. Notable works on stations include Paddington, Bond Street, Tottenham Court Road, Farringdon, Liverpool Street, Whitechapel, Canary Wharf, The bulk of the signalling work will Custom House, Woolwich and Abbey Wood. One of the design take place between Pudding Mill requirements for the news stations Lane Junction on the Great is that they last a century. Eastern Main Line in the East of London through to Shenfield in The design teams for the stations Essex, with expected delivery to were comprised of world-class take place in August 2018. engineers and architects such as WSP, Arup, Atkins, Burns & Nice, Weston Williamson and BDP. The stations will be as deep as 40m The 40 stations that Crossrail will below the surface, with many of call at each require 250m the mainline, London Underground and DLR stations enjoying a facelift as part of the works.

Stations

In order to ensure the final dimensions of the stations, a perfect mockup of the platform was constructed from foam and plywood, experimenting with various materials and finishes for both an aesthetic and practical effect. Crossrail will also learn from the experiences of TfL in terms of signage, lighting, layout and cladding systems. Farringdon Station SCL works © Crossrail

The flagship station will be

Paddington, which receives passengers from Heathrow airport and therefore needs to impress international visitors. Because the building is Grade I Listed, meaning that it cannot be altered either internally or externally without consultation and permission from Historic England, the new design will be sympathetic to Isambard Kingdom Brunel’s original designs dating back to the 1850s.

Road station, buildings in the surrounding area have been demolished to make way for an impressive new station. Crossrail is changing the face of London.

sections of the route.

The service will operate 24 trains per hour at peak times in each direction from Paddington to Whitechapel, taking twenty minutes off the travel time from Heathrow to Central London. It is MTR will operate Crossrail estimated by Crossrail that services, following a competitive approximately 200 million procurement process for the passengers will use the service £1.4billion contract, which will last annually. for a duration of eight years with an option to extend for a further As part of the upgrade to ten. MTR began operating services Paddington, the taxi rank will be in May 2015 between Liverpool London is an unusual city, with an moved, a new Hammersmith and Street and Shenfield, using existing ever-changing identity it evolves City Line station will be built to operating stock until the more than grows, dynamic in both ease over-crowding, and there will Bombardier 345s are rolled out. its form and function. Crossrail is be improved pedestrian access another evolution in its history, an and provision for future MTR’s appointment as operator addition to the web of history development above the new line will require that they liaise with beneath the ground. It will enable alongside the canal. TfL, Bombardier and Crossrail Ltd economic expansion in the short(the corporation overseeing the term, it will transport a generation, Bond Street is less hindered by construction of the project), as and has created iconic buildings historical sensibilities, and will well as Network Rail, from whom which will stand for a century. And therefore benefit from a brand they will require track access that is quite a thing. new, sleek and modern ticketing agreements to run trains on All images are copyright of Crossrail hall. For the new Tottenham Court Network Rail lines for some

Operation

Crossing London

TBM Elizabeth breaks through into Stepney Green cavern © Crossrail

The Internet of Things and the Railway Industry With machine-to-machine connectivity now commonplace, how is the Internet of Things impacting our railways? By Naomi Thompson The interconnectivity of devices, from phones to homes, or tracks to wheels, has brought us into an age where science fiction is a mundane reality. The novelty of communication and transfers of data between people and people, people and objects and now objects and objects, has worn off. And the latter, which is arguably the most extraordinary development in the last twenty years of technological evolution, has been reduced to the nebulous phrase, the “internet of things”.

The Railway of the Future

Safety

The first rule of train operation is “don’t crash”. However, trains, The railway of the future is being large, heavy and typically predicted to be many things: fast moving, have a stopping ergonomic, seamless, integrated, distance usually measured in efficient, safe. And busy. Global kilometres, which means that lastpassenger traffic is expected to second responses do not usually double in the next five years, stop accidents. Systems which creating a hive of underground, enable data transfer between overground, light rail, high speed, trains, control centres and other trains can very accurately predict urban and intercity trains all train movements and are travelling on to-the-second schedules that allow for no margin therefore most effective at preventing accidents. of error – because a single error The internet of things, which is to could result in human tragedy. The various systems which say, the capacity for transference contribute towards operating a of data between objects, is So to avoid that human tragedy, train are subject to SIL transforming our world. The the human element must be assessments and given an SIL capacity to bring objects into the removed as far as possible. rating, defined by looking at the communication network will allow Indeed, safety integrity levels (SIL) probability of an incident, the for the creation of applications are generally higher the less severity and the environmental, that improve safety, efficiency and human involvement a system material and human factors. This ease of use. Machine to machine makes train management systems (M2M) communication as part of a requires. The greater the interconnectivity between track (TMS) a key priority in improving cloud-based, centrally managed monitoring, train, and signalling SIL ratings in the rail industry. system, will enable safe and efficient use of existing and future systems, the safer, more efficient and, ironically, more ergonomic A TMS turns a train into a assets and transform the railway than they are. industry. communication hub, connected 35

to other trains and control centres so that all elements (train, track, signal, interlocking and station) know where everything else is and will be. This not only makes trains safer, but means they can operate in closer proximity and therefore on tighter and more efficient schedules.

Cologne, has to be equipped with seven different train control systems. The changing systems mean that sometimes locomotives and often drivers have to switch at national borders to ensure compatibility and competence with a foreign ATP.

Most high-speed routes in Europe are now built with ETCS Level 2, which delivers constant The next-generation signalling communication between the train system is the European Railway and the group using GSM-R, a Traffic Management System wireless communication platform (ERTMS), currently being rolled which delivers voice and data out across Europe. The project is communication between the track being developed by Alstom, and train, providing data to Ansaldo STS, AZD Praha, control centres. This means that Bombardier Transportation, CAF, the movement of any train, in Mermec, Siemens Mobility and relation to all other trains, is Thales, working with the European closely monitored and controlled Union and GSM-R (Global System by software systems, which then for Mobile Communication â&#x20AC;&#x201C; communicate with interlocking Railway) and other industry systems in order to avoid stakeholders to create an adaptive collisions at junctions, using and intelligent system with realcomplex software. time traffic management and decision support systems. However, the replacement of traditional signalling systems with It is intended that ERTMS will ERTMS is not simple, easy or develop existing technologies and cheap. The rollout of ERTMS new innovations, such as GPS, throughout Europe is delayed in high-speed, high-capacity data several countries. Most recently, transfer and voice communication the Netherlands put ERTMS rollout systems, as well as automation on hold pending a review of technology and innovations in management, spending and other real-time data collection, priorities. France and Germany processing and communication have also encountered difficulties systems. All of these elements can then be brought together within a single TMS to make it a holistic entity which can consolidate and efficiently organise a railway network.

Signalling

As part of the project, a single automatic train protection system (ATP) will replace existing national systems (of which there are more than 20) to create a uniform network in all member states as part of the creation of a Single Railway Area. Currently, the Thalys train, which runs from Paris to

Image courtesy of Bombardier

adapting their railways, forcing the European deadline for mainline rollout to 2030. Should ERTMS work as it is envisioned and be developed into a holistic information management system, it will firmly establish itself as a world-standard signalling system.

Rolling Stock and Track Maintenance Onboard and trackside sensors constantly monitoring equipment and components mean that predictive maintenance can be undertaken at the right time, thereby reducing the costs of asset management. From sensors which monitor track vibration, inground sensors which measure water table levels and potential landslide spots, to software which calculates distance travelled plus weight of cargo mean that maintenance and replacement works can be carried out before they fail but not so early that it becomes economically unviable to run a network. By developing high-performance technologies for traction and critical structural components, command control and cabin environment applications, the lifecycle of rolling stock is extended

and their energy efficiency improved, which in turn makes railway networks safer, reduces costs and increases the attractiveness and competitiveness of rail over other modes of transport, thus encouraging further investment to improve further.

experience. This experience is enhanced further by analytics of passenger behaviour, looking at patterns of seating choice and crowd movements, systems can be put in place, and advice sent directly to passengers via smartphones, which will in turn make journeys smoother.

It also eliminates the need for engineers and technicians to carry out maintenance checks on site, thus it avoids disrupting services, saving time and money that these checks require, as well as ensuring the safety of staff. Track-to-train communication also means that obstacles or faults can be immediately spotted, crews can be dispatched immediately, services diverted accordingly and passengers informed within seconds.

Automated Trains

Passenger Information With the Internet of Things, passenger information is transformed. Without the need for human input, travel information can be relayed directly trains, tracks to control centres and then directly to passenger information boards, mobile phone apps and websites delivering real-time data.

Automatic train operation is increasingly becoming the norm on metro networks internationally, from Budapest to London, Singapore and New York. Although some still employ drivers as a last-resort failsafe, driverless automated trains are increasingly successful, with everything up to the doors opening and closing carried out without human involvement. As such, fully automated trains are discussed now as a safety feature, and an inevitability that they will become standard on all metros in the near future, and mainline services not long after that.

Security

Because of the rigorous testing that each system undergoes, they are effectively failsafe. Therefore, and bringing us full-circle, the greatest threat to a fully automated railway network is With the development of human beings – which is to say – technology, rail transport can be cybersecurity. Previously, a seamlessly integrated into terrorist actually had to show up in passengers’ devices to fulfill their order to derail a train; now it can transportation needs by improving be done from the comfort of his IT, management and crossown bunker. industry collaboration to integrate rail into other forms of transport. Cybersecurity, protecting against not only threats of violence, but Using linked data, innovations in also industrial espionage and theft connectivity, the internet and of passenger information, is an social media, rail operators can ongoing battle. Not long after a communicate with passengers system is fully protected is it and receive information in return breached again as hackers find to improve customer services and new ways to circumvent security create a more cohesive passenger measures. 37

Risk management systems have to account for broadening boundaries around networks, which, in the railway industry, is an almost countless number of sensors, control rooms, cloudbased architecture systems and personnel, right down to the smartphones held by passengers, which are all constantly uploading and downloading data, which at any point could be intercepted. Early warning systems are crucial to the security of networks, with a well-designed and implemented cyber threat intelligence strategy that evolves as fast as the threats they manage. Incidence reporting and detection is equally as important in order to ensure a rapid response. Co-operation with other stakeholders, from international to local authorities and partners, also minimises risk.

The Internet of Things The rail industry is a sector of innovation like few others. It has become the greenest, safest form of mass transport in the world precisely because it has taken advantage of new technologies; from innovations which harness breaking energy to entirely automated metro networks. Most passengers do not realise that they are travelling in a partially self-powered vehicle, driven by a computer, communicating with other self-powered, computerdriven vehicles in a tight and highly orchestrated formation while it transports a population. And that is science fiction, reduced to the banal, nebulous phrase, “the Internet of Things”.

Tracking Position: Wearing Out the Wheel-Rail Interface With wayside inspection becoming much more sophisticated, how can it be used to improve the safety of rail infrastructure and rolling stock?

By Paul Bladon

Wayside condition monitoring of rolling stock is becoming increasingly advanced, and the last 20 years in particular have seen large leaps in technology, from simple wheel sensors in the 1970s to the modern-day implementations of complex sites with multiple instruments. Wayside monitoring the condition of rolling stock requires monitoring several key aspects of bogies. The wheel-rail interface is a relatively closed system; suboptimal bogie condition will be reflected in the rail, and viceversa. It also means that different aspects of bogies, such as flange wear, side bearings, springs, steering performance and lateral stability are all interrelated.

developed to evaluate the condition of specific bogie components such as wheel profiles, journal bearings, wheel surface, brake blocks, springs, etc. All this data is useful, but how does it translate to what is being experienced at the wheel-rail interface? In other words, how is the bogie performing? Angle of Attack (AOA) is a key parameter used to characterise the wheel-rail interface. Tracking

Wayside systems employing noncontact measurement technologies have been 38

Position (TP) is an equally important parameter, but is not as well known. A wheelsetâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s AOA is defined as the angle between the centreline of the wheelset axle and the radial line of the curve, which would be a line perpendicular to the rails for straight (tangent) track. Tracking Position is defined as the lateral displacement of a wheelset between the middle of the wheelset and the track centreline.

The wheelsets of a bogie on tangent track should have an AOA of zero and a TP of zero, i.e. the wheelsets should be centred between the rails, and the axle centreline of the wheelsets should be perpendicular to the rails. A deviation from this condition would be detrimental to the wheel-rail interface.

elemental patterns (IAM, ROT, TE, SHIFT) as well as instability (HUNTING) â&#x20AC;&#x201C; see Figure 2. Each of these combinations is observed on wagons in revenue service and point to specific root causes.

This is the purpose of the TBOGI (Truck Bogie Optical Geometry Deviations from the ideal wheelset Inspection) wayside system, which measures these defects on TP and AOA values may manifest Example Extreme Tracking Error (42.3 mm) tangent track at line speed. themselves in one or both wheelsets of a bogie, and in different combinations. The different combinations result in specific wear to the bogieâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s wheels and components, and similarly inflict specific wear Tracking Position defects have regimes on the rail. specific sets of common root causes, and the stresses cause All of these combinations can interrelated wear/damage ultimately result in derailment. between these components.

Where do Tracking Position defects come from?

The TBOGI System

If the root cause(s) are identified, the sequence of wear can be broken and both wheels and the rail enjoy significantly longer lifespans as a result. Derailments are also reduced. The various combinations of AOA and TP manifested on two-axle bogies can be classified into four

This article will examine Tracking Position errors specifically, and how they manifest in bogies as either Tracking Error or Shift. Once TE begins to manifest, it typically degrades quickly, leading to severe wear of the wheels and rail, and ultimately derailment.

A single axle with a Tracking Position defect will develop asymmetrical wear, until one flange is thin, and the mate wheel experiences hollowing. The most common causes are mismatched wheel diameters, or uneven brake beam movement, applying excess brake shoe pressure on one side.

What does this mean for rail infrastructure and rolling stock? Rail Infrastructure: defective tracking behaviour is a primary cause of accelerated rail wear throughout a rail network. Each type of defect manifests as specific types of rail wear: Tracking Position Defects

Angle-of-Attacks Defects

(a) Head checking / gauge corner cracking (b) Shelling (c) Longitudinal fatigue cracking (d) Flow of flash-butt material on the gauge corner of the rail (e) Greater derailment risk

(a) Intermittent crown wear as lateral material flows, particularly in curves (b) Deformation discontinuities form as corrugations or material flow (c) Lateral fatigue cracking and that can lead to rail breaks (d) Surface breaking cracks which develop into rail squats (e) Greater derailment risk

When the bogie itself experiences a Tracking Position defect – either as TE or Shift – both wheelsets are experiencing misalignment. Therefore, fixing one thin flange will most likely not fix the issue and the bogie will continue to wear out wheels (and other bogie components) at an accelerated rate. Depending on whether the defect is TE or Shift, there are common underlying cause(s) that are well understood – such as bearing adaptors, springs, wedges etc. – and railways are directed to these specific components to improve efficiency and reduce costs. Tracking Error falls under the category of a Tracking Position Defect, so is primarily responsible for longitudinal fatiguing on the rail as well as gauge corner wear. Rolling Stock: by monitoring tracking behaviour, rolling stock operators are able to identify whether a wheelset or bogie is compromised. For example, repairing individual defective components without knowing the underlying cause(s) is analogous

to attempting to fix a car’s suspension by watching the tyre’s tread wear: it cannot be known why the wear is actually there, and components can be fixed and released but it will not be known if that has been successful or not until the wear re-emerges, by which stage the damage/wear has been re-done and the costs reincurred. Wheelsets can be swapped out with newly profiled wheels, but if the bogie still has a severe TE (for example) upon release, then it should be identified immediately (well before the wheels have worn out again) and maintenance directed at the root causes of the issue.

Hunting (Instability) Defects (a) A combination of wear patterns (b) Repeated flange impacts (c) Spin creep and ‘scrubbing’ action against the rail (d) Greater derailment risk

components such bearings and springs, and ultimately reaches the point where the wheelsets of the bogie will have thin flanges and hollowing/heat checking – typically on opposite sides of each wheelset. Individual components/wheelsets can be swapped out, but unless the TE is addressed it will simply wear out those components repeatedly until the fundamental issue is addressed. TE can also be a common cause of derailments.

Strain gauges are useful for load imbalance detection, but are not suited to monitoring these defects. A strain gauge may give a high force reading, but what does that mean? Forces are highly variable depending on speed, loaded condition, direction, rail Alerts can be set up before the most costly wear has occurred (or friction coefficient, and track curvature. TBOGI is largely derailments have occurred) – along with actions to address why immune to all of these variables. Also, strain gauges measure lateral it has occurred so issues can be prevented from happening again, and vertical forces but have not simply caught once they have limited visibility of longitudinal forces, and are therefore limited in happened again. knowing how the data translates For TE specifically, as it degrades it to the bogie. Strain gauges do not measure hunting directly – rather, puts more wear/stress on 40

54% LOSS relative to Normal Wear Index

New Wheels (Grey) vs Tracking Error (Green + Red)

NORMALIZED WEAR INDEX

1.8

1.4

Normal Wear Index

1 3 0.6

0.2 0 .2

0 .3

0 .4

0 .5

FRICTION IN CONTACT ZONE

TE through RH Curve

TE through LH Curve

27% GAIN relative to Normal Wear Index

New Wheels through RH/LH Curves

they infer it as a factor score. derailments from 7 per annum TBOGI measures bogie geometry in 2010, down to 2 per annum and tracking behaviour on tangent in 2013. track where the bogies are in a free rolling condition un-coerced • By using a wayside super-site to identify bogies presenting by curving forces. TBOGI’s optical derailment risks from poor TE, data is more dependable, more ArcelorMittal Infrastructure meaningful, more repeatable and Canada has not had a related can be accurately trended. derailment since 2003, and has experienced huge Bogies exhibiting TE will steer improvements in reduced rail favorably through a specific curve wear, and increased wheel orientation, but extremely poorly lifespan. through curves of the opposite orientation. Such performance • BNSF was able to reduce the reinforces the degenerative and most costly and dangerous TE accelerated diagonal wheel wear defects from 51.6/100,000 in pattern on the bogie. Illustrated on 2009, down to 3.9/100,000 in following page1: 2014.

What results are achievable by monitoring Tracking Error?

• CSX was able to reduce the most costly and dangerous TE defects from 6.9/100,000 in 2009, down to 0.8/100,000 in 2014.

The following are some example results of monitoring and The tracking behaviour of addressing Tracking Error2: wheelsets and bogies are crucial • By reducing bogies with to an optimal wheel-rail interface. extreme TE, BNSF has been Railways that monitor and address able to reduce TE related these defects have proven

histories of improved safety and reduced costs. Of these behaviours, Tracking Position is an important defect to monitor in order to manage derailment risk, wheel wear, rail wear, and maintenance cost. The defect corresponds to specific damages to the rail and to the bogie wheels/components. The TBOGI system monitors these parameters, and provides railways with easy ways to manage the data. 1 Excerpt from: Izbinsky G., Sirois G., Liu Y., D’Aoust D., “Monitoring Bogie Performance on Straight Track. Part 1. Wheel set tracking position”. The 7th World Congress on Railway Research, Montreal, June 2006 2 Excerpts from: Bladon, P., K. Bowling, H. Braren, J. Deslauriers and D. D’Aoust 2015 “The Challenges of Integrating Novel Wayside Rolling Stock Monitoring Technologies, A Case Study.” In, Proceedings of 2015 International Heavy Haul Conference, Perth. International Heavy Haul Association (IHHA), 417-426.

Conclusion

www.wid.ca

BT Cables BT Cables discusses its growth, performance and social responsibility commitments. BT Group plc acquired the business in July 2012, launching BT Cables and providing financial stability. Significant investment in the Manchester manufacturing plant has followed and we have embarked on a strategy to build a profitable growth business. Since acquisition, BT Cables has grown to annual sales of £75m, with 130+ customers across Europe and the Middle East. The product range has extended to include cable solutions for buildings and infrastructure, as well as optical fibre. Key customers include Network Rail, Openreach, Telefonica, Virgin Media and Cyta (Cyprus Telecom).

network spares, 60 cable compounds and in-house transport operation of 200+ vehicles. Other in-house capabilities include broadband hub tests and refurbishments, network and end-user technology staging / configuration, and safety testing and repair for field engineer equipment.

BT is committed to the BT Cables copper manufacturing base in Manchester, and is in the business for the long-term. Optical fibre cables are manufactured at a state-of-theart plant that has a successful track record in supplying fibre cables to blue chip companies such as Telefonica and ADIF.

We deliver quality products, competitive pricing and additional value to our customers that stand apart from the offerings our competitors can provide. We are passionate about our business.

We continue to seek to add value to the products we supply through our wealth of technical expertise in cable design and supply chain processes.

BT Supply Chain Standing alongside BT Cables is BT Supply Chain (BTSC), an emerging player in the supply chain and logistics sector for businesses with a large engineering field force. BTSC undertakes around 50,000 unique orders daily across varied B2B and B2C channels, including cable supply and contingency cable solutions. We have two national distribution centres, 98 forward stock locations, 38 managed kit rooms supporting

We believe that this provides unique opportunities for us to provide E2E cable management solutions that simplify the supply chain, minimise inventory holdings and working capital, and importantly provide operational cost savings.

Recycling BT Cables has a recycling operation on site in Manchester that manages surplus cable, damaged cable and scrap. We have carried out recycling and/or re-use programmes for customers in the past, and this is an aspect that helps our customers minimise waste.

Quality Assurance BT Cables is accredited to ISO9001, ISO14001 and OHSAS18001. We also run a Kaizen Continuous Improvement Programme that is at the heart of everything we do. The programme has been running continuously since 1999 and in that time has transformed the business.

Business continuity management BCM is a significant part of risk management and we have a comprehensive BCM plan. This plan covers: • Disaster recovery plan for the factory and logistics hub • Alternative supply arrangements for finished goods from approved sources in the event of a disaster at the factory • Risk mitigation in our inbound supply chain through multiple sourcing arrangements

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) BT has a vested interest in maintaining the reputation of its brand identity, and as an organisation we have a commitment to ethical trading. For this reason we have a rigorous CSR programme which has been running for over a decade. Our standards are based on: • Applicable labour, safety and environmental laws within the country of manufacture • The principles captured in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights • The core and non-core conventions of the International Labour Organisation

BT Cables – trust in our experience

NTSB’s Most-Wanted List A ‘Road Map from Lessons Learned to Lives Saved’ Puts Focus on Rail Technology

implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC) , which first appeared on the list in 1990 and whose deadline was pushed back to 2018 from 2015. Congress The National Transportation Safety changed the law and Board, the US government agency implementation deadline late last responsible for civil transportation year to avoid a possible rail transportation shut-down. accident investigation, including those involving railroads, has NTSB Chairman Christopher Hart unveiled its 2016 Most-Wanted List of safety improvements calling cited PTC implementation as an example of why a sense of it a ‘road map from lessons urgency is needed in learned to lives saved’. The list implementing the Most-Wanted focuses on 10 broad safety improvements on which the NTSB List improvements. ‘Every PTCpreventable accident, death and has made recommendations and injury on tracks and trains affected that have not yet been implemented. This year’s list has a by the law will be a direct result of the missed 2015 deadline and the major focus on technology in saving lives, preventing accidents delayed implementation of this life-saving technology,’ Hart said. and lessening the number and severity of injuries from accidents. The NTSB’s push to improve rail This article takes a look at the list transit safety oversight was in part in further detail. a result of the agency’s investigation into a deadly smoke The NTSB list called for completion of rail safety initiatives, event last January near including once again the Washington’s L’Enfant Plaza Metro NTSB’s Most-Wanted List – A ‘Road Map from Lessons Learned to Lives Saved’ Puts Focus on Rail Technology

station. The accident exposed many safety issues, some of which resulted from shortcomings in the safety oversight of WMATA (Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority). This year, the NTSB will continue to examine the way that the Federal Transit Administration is implementing such oversight – not only in Washington, but nationwide. Improving rail tank car safety by phasing out the use of DOT-111 rail tank cars to transport flammable liquids, such as crude oil and ethanol, is another improvement addressed in the 2016 Most-Wanted List. The deadline for implementing such tank rules is 2025. Until these tank cars are removed from service, people, their towns and the environment surrounding the rail system remain at risk the NTSB argues. Chairman Hart invoked the memory of the accident at LacMégantic, Canada, in 2013, which

killed 47 people and burned down more than 30 buildings, in a Washington Post report of the launch: ‘We’ve been lucky thus far that derailments involving flammable liquids in America have not yet occurred in a populated area,’ Hart said. ‘But an American version of Lac-Mégantic could happen at any time. Instead of happening out in the middle of a wheat field it could happen in the middle of a big city.’ Distraction (especially from portable electronic devices) and fatigue continue to be serious safety issues in all modes of

“

Chairman Christopher A. Hart of the NTSB is a lead speaker at the upcoming SafeRail (incorporating the PTC World Congress) taking place in Washington D.C. 22–23 March 2016. Chairman Hart will be joined by Yves Desjardins-Siciliano (CEO, VIA Rail Canada), Mike Marino, Director/General Manager The most-wanted transportation (Port Authority of NY & NJ (PATH)), safety improvements are the result Jeff Moller (AVP Safety, AAR) and of the NTSB's accident many more experts in rail safety investigations. And the NTSB and PTC. reiterated that their most powerful tool to learn safety lessons from By Luke Upton accidents is data recorders. Thus, the list calls for their increased use Printed with permission from Global Transport Forum. in all modes of transportation. transportation, and the NTSB’s 2016 Most-Wanted List addresses them all. The list also notes that undiagnosed and untreated medical conditions have caused or contributed to accidents and calls for operators and regulators to require medical fitness for duty.

Vincent Weeda, Traffic Analyst at ProRail: In 2016 ProRail will address the impact of disruptions (by prevention, fast fault repair, and optimal traffic management around the problem). After improving punctuality in regular operations to a fairly high level, the focus of our Performance Analysis Group will now shift to limiting cancellations as a result of disruptions.” 45

Windhoff will deliver... 35 self-propelled On-Track Machines to Swiss Federal Railways SBB crane. For improved access from the track bed the loading platform is partly lowered to a height of only 1.000 mm above rail-level. The high diesel engine output and the optimum applicable and efficient distribution of the driving torque onto both axles enable maximum traction forces for all upcoming vehicle applications. Even fully loaded (total weight 40 tons) a maximum travel speed of 100 km/h can be realized. Thanks to performance reserves gradients can be passed without loss of speed. Windhoff Bahn- und Anlagentechnik GmbH, Germany has obtained a contract for the design, production and delivery of 35 self-propelled On-Track Machines from SBB in Switzerland. This is the largest individual contract in the company`s history.

The new machines will be used for scheduled maintenance of the infrastructure as well as troubleshouting in case of urgent repair works. SBB had put the contract out to public tender; the final decision in favor of Windhoff is based on the fulfillment of the criteria “Quality” and “Efficiency”. Contributing to this decision – From spring 2017 onwards the among other things – is the new vehicles will be delivered innovative design of the running successively to SBB and gear: it combines low wear and according to the current high tractive effort with scheduling - the last OTMs will be extraordinary curve negotiating rolled out in 2021. During this time characteristics. SBB is entitled to opt for the additional delivery of further Each vehicle will be equipped with vehicles of the same type. a loading platform and a loading 46

The vehicle layout features two independent driver’s positions which allow for both a seated and standing position of the operator to enable safe vehicle movements when running in open line and in

possession respectively during shunting. Visibility was permanently tested during the tendering phase and optimized for the current solution. Initially a number of 5 vehicles will undergo a 6 months testing period in full operation and all gained experiences herein will be transferred into serial production before final takeover. Apart of minimized life cycle costs SBB emphasizes low fuel consumption for the new OTM fleet. This will be achieved by a twin-engine power installation with energy-saving automatic start-stop function. For the first time these new OTMs will be equipped with â&#x20AC;&#x153;ETCS-onlyâ&#x20AC;&#x153; as the standard cab signaling equipment in Switzerland. The challenge to meet the requirements of this technical novelty was successfully implemented by the Windhoff engineers. Again the Windhoff team was able to provide the best technical and economical solution for a tailored system.

Upcoming Events February – April 2016 International Railway Summit 17–19 February 2016 Vienna, Austria February’s railway events kick off with the International Railway Summit, featuring exciting talks about Shift2Rail, a look at European railways and big data in the railway context, the 4th railway package and urban rail, with Supeo as the headline sponsor. More info: www.irits.org/index.html

Rail Business Awards 2015 25 February London, UK Hosted by Nick Hewem, of The Apprentice fame, categories for the 2015 awards include Rail Business of the Year, Train Operator, Women in Rail Award, Young Professional, Train Operator and Rail Engineer of the Future. More info: www.railbusinessawards.com/

12th UIC World ERTMS Conference 29 February – 2 March

IT Trans 1–3 March

Karlsruhe, Germany Organized by UITP, March starts Brussels, Belgium with this conference that looks at IT Hosted by the International Union solutions for public transport. There of Railways (UIC) and INFRABEL, this will be a conference and an conference, “ERTMS – Managing exhibition. The exhibition will see long term safety investment in a rapidly changing world” will feature businesses and associations of the public transport industry present six main topics: long term and developments and innovations, future vision safety, migration, while the conference will provide a global challenges, financing and discussion platform to come up asset management, operation, evolution. with IT solutions to support public More info: www.uic.org and sustainable urban transport. More info: www.it-trans.org

4th Railway Forum Berlin 2016 29 February – 1 March

Eurasia Rail 2016

Berlin, Germany Deutsche Bahn AG and the Institute for Production Management organize this annual supply chain conference as a management platform in the railway industry. It will feature 500 conference participants, 70 decision makers from Deutsche Bahn AG, 50 exhibitors as well as partners and sponsors. More info: www.railwayforumberlin.com

Istanbul, Turkey Organized by ITE Turkey, the 6th International Rolling Stock, Infrastructure & Logistics Exhibition will feature conferences and seminars with an expected 300 exhibitors and 10,000 visitors. Topics will include urban railway issues, railway legislation, railway safety management systems and special issues for railways. More info: www.eurasiarail.eu

3–5 March

Middle East Rail 2016

Intermodal Asia 2016

8–9 March

22–24 March

Dubai, United Arab Emirates A great place to buy and demo new technology and learn about future projects, exhibitors come from the fields of engineering & construction, signalling, communication & IT, rolling stock, tunnelling, safety & security and consultants, lawyers & banks amongst others. More info: www.terrapinn.com/exhibition /middle-east-rail/index.stm

Shanghai, China This 3-day container, transport and logistics event will take place in China, one of the world’s most important logistics markets, allowing attendees to discover innovative products and meet suppliers to help their businesses. The conference will focus on strategy, innovation and technology. More info: www.intermodalasia.com

American Passenger Rolling Stock 2016 16–17 March Washington D.C., USA The two-day event will host highlevel executives and engineers from all sectors of the rail industry with a vested interest in the longevity and cost-reduction in operating passenger rolling stock. More info: www.passenger-rollingstock-maintenance.com

SafeRail Congress 22–23 March

Short Line & Regional Conference 3–6 April Washington D.C., USA This event will feature committee meetings on safety & training, railroad police & security, finance & administration, human resources, technology, veterans recruitment and legislative policy as well as a young professionals gathering. More info:www.aslrra.org/aslrra 2016connections

EXPO Ferroviaria 2016 5–7 April

Turin, Italy Washington D.C., USA Italy’s leading rail event is a Hosted by the Global Transport showcase for the latest railway Forum, our featured event of this equipment, products and services. The show will be attended by issue, this conference is all about suppliers and manufacturers from ensuring safety, security and many sectors, including vehicle operational efficiency on North maintenance, security systems, American rail networks. Topics communications technology and include positive train control, IT and freight terminal equipment. homeland security in rail More info: transportation and cybersecurity. www.expoferroviaria.com More info: /eng/page.cfm/Link=1/t=m/go Section=1 www.SafeRailCongress.com

Infrarail 2016 12–14 April London, UK An exhibition devoted to railway infrastructure and the feature event of the second issue of our magazine in 2016. Taking place every two years, railway infrastructure is currently seeing huge investment in the UK – HS2 and Crossrail are examples of that. With that in mind, people from the industry can do business, find out about trends in technology and network in this field that is receiving massive investment. More info: www.infrarail.com

SmartRail Europe 19–20 April Amsterdam, Netherlands This event features four congresses, smart signalling & telecoms, smart IT networks, smart train, and smart passenger in one show. A wide variety of topics will be covered, from maximising capacity and performance with ERTMS, what big data can do for rail, meeting performance objectives for rolling stock and optimising operations to meet customer expectations of service. More info: www.SmartRailEurope.com

MENA Transport Congress & Exhibition 24–27 April Dubai, United Arab Emirates Hosted by UITP, the International Association of Public Transport, this congress and exhibition features categories such as signalling and traffic control tunnelling, electrification equipment, components for rolling stock, track building and maintenance and many more. The slogan of this year’s event is “Urban Mobility – Think Big”. The goal is to liberate the cities of the future from the environmental, social and economic consequences of traffic congestion. More info: www.uitp-mena.com/

COMMERCIAL COMPANIES: CLAIM YOUR 10% DISCOUNT BY QUOTING TAUT10 WHEN REGISTERING

FREE to attend for Rail Operators, Metros & Government

HOST RAILWAY SUPPORTER

19-20 APRIL 2016

PASSENGER TERMINAL AMSTERDAM AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS

IMPROVING OPERATIONS, REDUCING COSTS AND ENHANCING EXPERIENCE THROUGH TECHNOLOGY

SmartRail provided me with a valuable overview of the innovation challenges ahead and good opportunities to

ARJEN ZOETEMAN, SENIOR POLICY ADVISOR, DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, PRORAIL

4 C O N G R E SSE S , 1 DE F I N I TI VE S H OW

Hear international ERTMS best practice to address todays technical issues

Reduce cost, improve service and maintenance, and reach operational excellence with integrated IT

Improve rolling stock ROI and meet customer expectations with big data analysis and design innovation

Satisfy customer expectations of on-board services, train comfort, service performance and connectivity

K E Y SP E A KE R S I N CLU DE :

Gottfried Eymer CEO DB Schenker Rail Scandinavia

LEAD SPONSOR

Bjorn Westerberg CEO, Association of Swedish Train Operating Companies

Carsten Carstensen CEO Hamburg Koln Express

Teemu Rintala Head of Data Analytics, VR Finnish Railways

ASSOCIATE SPONSORS

Stefan Engdahl Executive Director Market and Planning TraďŹ kverket

GLOBAL RAIL ENGINEERING SPONSOR

Visit www.SmartRailEurope.com

CYBERSECURITY PARTNER

MĂĄrton Feldmann Deputy CEO, Business Affairs MĂ V

WORKSHOP SPONSORS

Sverre Kjenne Director of Signalling and Telecommunications Jernbaneverket

ROUNDTABLE SPONSOR

ORGANISED BY

MEDIA PARTNER

We hope you have enjoyed our latest Railway-News magazine. Be sure to look out for our next issue. We are now producing a magazine on a quarterly basis so please do not hesitate to contact us at al@railway-news.com if you would like to feature your latest technology in an upcoming issue. Please also take a look at www.railway-news.com for all the latest rail news, events and technology.

Office Tel: +44 (0) 1392 580002 A2B Global Media

Third Floor

| |

Mob: +44 (0) 7432 725001

11-15 Dix's Field

| EX1 1QA

Exeter

email: al@railway-news.com | United Kingdom