Ravi Thakker_Urban Design Portfolio 2024

Page 1

RAVI THAKKER

// URBAN DESIGNER

// PLANNER

// ARCHITECT

PORTFOLIO

SELECTED WORKS 2017-2024

PROJECTS PROLOGUE

Urban state of mind

This portfolio delves into the captivating relationship between People, Spaces, and Design. Through a curated selection of projects, it explores the interconnectedness of urban design, planning, architecture, and landscape design, with a focus on specific thematic elements in each project. These works showcase a blend of analytical and professional skills, coupled with design thinking approaches and conceptualization. The overarching aim is to view these projects in a larger context, as they connect spatial, social, and sustainable approaches for the built environment. With a strong emphasis on urban design, urban research, and architectural design, this portfolio encapsulates the essence of these themes in a comprehensive and compelling manner.

OUR 35TH

An Urban Design Plan For 35th Street, McKinley Park Chicago, Illinois

URBAN DESIGN URBAN DESIGN/ PLANNING ECOLOGICAL DESIGN COMMUNITY DESIGN ENGAGEMENT URBAN RESEARCH PUBLICATION 06 Research and documentation of mumbai streets and build typologies Mumbai, Maharastra [RE] CODING MUMBAI 04 Blurring Edges Chicago, Illinois MADISON FOR EVERYONE 02
odd compromise between human and nature Chicago, Illinois CHICAGO’S NEW NATURE 01 Professional urban design projects Chicago, Illinois URBAN WORKS URBAN ANALYSIS 05 Urban Tissue analysis Chicago, Illinois 20 MIN DOWNTOWN
The
03

01

URBAN WORKS

PROFESSIONAL URBAN DESIGN PROJECTS

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS PROJECT LOCATION :

ROLE : WORK :

CITY OF CHICAGO, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

URBAN DESIGNER - RESEACH, CONCEPT, DESIGN, DRAWINGS, RENDERS, GRAPHICS

As an Urban Designer in Chicago’s Central Region, I seamlessly align planning policies with urban design, meticulously reviewing and analyzing varied plan development projects. Proficient in compliance evaluation, I contribute to the city’s vision, crafting guidelines for projects spanning parks, open spaces, infrastructure, special districts, and masterplans. My work integrates sustainable urban strategies, ensuring compliance with building and planning codes. Through studies and developments, I strive for a harmonious urban environment that reflects innovation while upholding regulatory standards for a vibrant cityscape.

GIS, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop, SketchUp, Vray

Explore the evolution of Fulton Market, Chicago’s historic meat-packing district, into a dynamic live-work-play neighborhood. The City of Chicago’s ongoing planning ensures economic vitality and functionality while preserving historic charm. This tour covers the area’s history, development initiatives, design guidelines, landmark regulations, and infrastructure studies. Learn about zoning changes, density bonuses, and the Fulton Market Innovation District Plan, aiming to offer more affordable housing options for a sustainable urban future.

Crafted compelling graphic content and engagement boards for public communication. Played a role in shaping vision statements and contributed to the pivotal Central Area Plan (CAP) Update, integrating community feedback for Phases 1 & 2. Conducted meticulous analysis for the CAP report, transforming data points into insightful maps and illustrated diagrams.

Online Survey Participation Pop-up Event Participation UPTOWN FARMERS MARKET TASTE OF CHICAGO HUMBOLDT PARK AUSTIN TOWN HALL CITY MARKET 27TH WARD STAY IN SCHOOL EVENT SUNDAYS ON STATE CHINATOWN SUMMER FAIR A B C D 26-50 76-100 51-75 126-150 101-125 151+ 0-25 Range indicates number of responses by Zipcode Regional Pop-up Event Locations: Two Online Surveys Conducted: General Survey (2,741 total responses) Youth Survey (1,554 analyzed responses) 21-80 201-300+ 81-200 0-20 Range indicates number of participants by Zipcode H G Online Survey Participation Pop-up Event Participation UPTOWN FARMERS MARKET TASTE OF CHICAGO HUMBOLDT PARK AUSTIN TOWN HALL CITY MARKET 27TH WARD STAY IN SCHOOL EVENT SUNDAYS ON STATE CHINATOWN SUMMER FAIR A B C D 26-50 76-100 51-75 126-150 101-125 151+ 0-25 Range indicates number of responses by Zipcode Regional Pop-up Event Locations: Two Online Surveys Conducted: General Survey (2,741 total responses) Youth Survey (1,554 analyzed responses) 21-80 201-300+ 81-200 0-20 Range indicates number of participants by Zipcode H F D C
“ ” 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 New Construction Rehab/ Adaptive re-use Both 110 N. Carpenter 122 N. Aberdeen 210 N. Aberdeen 1000 W. Fulton Market Morgan St. Sta�on 185 N. Morgan 160 N. Morgan 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 932 W. Fulton 939 W. Fulton 905 W. Fulton 832 W. Fulton 311 N. Morgan 375 N. Morgan & 901 W. Kinzie 360 N. Green 330 N. Green 333 N. Green 357 N. Green 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 800 W. Fulton Market 801 W. Fulton Market 200 N. Green 167 N. Green 170 N. Green 848-856 W. Randolph 900 W. Randolph Soho House: 113 N. Green 21 22 23 24 25 START END F MI D TOUR Points of Interest DP D FULTON MARKET INNOVATION DISTRICT TOUR Discover how Fulton Market, Chicago’s historic meat-packing and warehouse district, has become the premier live-work-play neighborhood. Ongoing planning ensures it remains vital economic engine and desirable, functional, mixed-use, mixed-income neighborhood while preserving the historic and urban character the community. Attendees will learn how the City of Chicago has planned and responded to an area that has evolved from land-use perspective and is experiencing rapid expansion. The tour will cover the history of the area and the plans and initiatives that facilitated and guided development in the area, including the West Loop Design Guidelines and the Fulton-Randolph Market Landmark District regulations used to guide the design of future development and preservation of historic buildings; the Kinzie Framework plan that identified employment trends and land use changes over time; the Kinzie Industrial Corridor Infrastructure study commissioned to understand infrastructure issues and priorities for the area; the zoning changes adopted to accommodate greater mix of uses; the density bonus system allowing for additional density in projects, while funding local public improvements and development in the city’s underserved neighborhoods; and the Fulton Market Innovation District Plan that among other goals seeks to provide more affordable housing options. N Aberdeen St N Carpenter St N Morgan St N Halsted St N Sangamon St N Peoria St N Green St N May St W Hubbard St W Kinzie St W Fulton St W Lake St W Randolph St W Washington Blvd W Carroll Ave Landmark Historic District Landmark Historic District Route START END N 25 04 05 375 N. Morgan & 901 W. Kinzie 12 900 W. Randolph Soho House: 113 N. Green 24 25 END F MI D TOUR DP D W Washington Blvd Landmark / Historic District Landmark Historic District Route END N

Research and Studies

Conducted comprehensive research for the Equitable Transit-Oriented Development (ETOD) site, specifically for the upcoming railway station in the city. This involved surveying zoning amendments, identifying potential plan developments, and evaluating TIFs and other special zone regulations. Integrated elements of Urban Design standards to ensure a holistic approach to the development process.

Conducted research on city bus-station infrastructure, exploring options for multimodal and multiusable spaces. Explored the viability of public development or public-private development partnerships, envisioning the city’s first bus-station with mixed-use possibilities— residential, commercial, and small business ventures. Compared global options to create a blueprint, leading to re-zoning and re-coding of development standards. Applied urban design solutions to address transit, economic, and housing challenges.

Test Fits and Exploration

Conducted a thorough survey, iterated options considering diverse zoning and planning regulations for a site with a complex context. The objective was to explore combinations of land parcels and potential development types within city regulations and existing permits.

Performed comprehensive research on modular designs approved under the city’s plans for field house developments. The objective was to identify potential sites in the neighborhood that align with community expectations. This involved navigating through zoning changes, transferring developments, and upgrading structures to meet code requirements. The urban planning and design process focused on understanding community needs and tailoring the area to accommodate the desired facilities

02

CHICAGO’S NEW NATURE

THE ODD COMPROMISE BETWEEN HUMAN AND NATURE

ACADEMIC (GROUP)

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS PROJECT LOCATION : SEMESTER : ROLE : WORK : GUIDE :

RESEACH, CONCEPT, DESIGN, DRAWINGS, RENDERS, GRAPHICS

MCD - SPRING SEMESTER 23’

AR.PHIL ENQUIST (SOM)

DR.SEVIN YILDIZ

“The New Nature” is a conceptual framework plan for the Override Studio (MCD) that acknowledges the existing systems and redefines the region’s ecological framework strategies through a systems thinking approach. Chicagoland, being a complex and layered urban landscape, encompasses not only humanmade infrastructure but also natural systems. The studio’s aim is to map these relationships in order to explore new typological arrangements for Override confluences. The framework emphasizes an adaptive repurposing approach to urban design and planning that is climate-responsive.

GIS, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop, SketchUp, Vray

// Green Infrastructure // Form Based Coding // Planning // Resilience // Place- making // Sustainability // Urban Design // Prototyping // Research // Landscape
ECOLOGICAL DESIGN

This studio we are expanding from one connection to address a larger conjunction of ecosystems and its impact on urban fabric, Situating chicago’s location in the larger canvas we see lake michigan (part of great lake) connecting mississippi through, chicago river, des plains and illinois.

The series of locks and dams that exist along the Chicago and Illinois Rivers reveals the past and present use of these rivers as engineered systems operational for the shipping and transportation of goods and people.

CHICAGO’S TIMELINE

The Sanitary District of Chicago (now The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District) was created by the Illinois legislature

Permanent reversal of the Chicago River was attained

The first lands were obtained—500 acres

The Lakefront Protection Ordinance Tthe Forest Preserves help found Chicago Wilderness

The Illinois and Michigan Canal completed Construction of the 28-mile Sanitary and Ship Canal

The Forest Preserve District of Cook County was established

The 16-mile Cal-Sag Channel was constructed Chicago Adopts the TARP (Tunner and reservoir Plan)

The Sanitary District of Chicago was renamed the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago

The Forest Preserves release the Next Century Conservation Plan (NCCP)

ECOLOGICAL ABUNDANCE
Urban Sprawl OVERVIEW
IDENTITIES AND ISSUES 1848 1889 1892 1900 1914 1916 1922 1972 1973 1989 1996 2014
ENGINEERED SYSTEMS URBAN SPRAWL FLOOD ZONE
WETLAND TO AGRICULTURAL NPK RUNOFF
QUARRY FIELDS
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE INDUSTRIAL GROWTH FREIGHT LINES FRAGMENTED NATURE
WATERWAYS PROFILE Early 1800’s original river flow Engineered Systems to reverse the flow The island created due to system ‘C’ shaped imapcet zone

The mapping of Green and blue infrastructure indicate the major confluence points, fragmented and degradation of natural systems, the dispersing urban sprawl. The primary goal is to connected the broken links, allow the natural system to thrive and diffuse into the urban core.

Above map helps us analyze the topography of Chicagoland that shows how Chicago’s terrain shapes ecological systems in the region. Valleys cutting through ridges create a unique geomorphology of streams and gullies that eventually connect to the larger watersheds.

Wildlife move between aquatic, riparian and upland habitats making encroachment a pressing issue as habitat connectivity is lost. Mapping mammal richness along the river and open space networks give us a scope to create spaces that alow biodiversity to thrive by connecting the broken islands of habitat and migration.

This map details the areas where watersheds, rivers, wetlands, and flood prone zones are located. Understanding the flow between watersheds, rivers, and tributaries is vital to understanding where and what interventions should be pursued since these sites act as a funnel into bigger watersheds and ecosystems

The network of utilities that stretch across the city and connect the dense urban fabric to sub-urban and rural communities. these utility corridors allows us to understand how engineered and human made systems are layered on top of natural systems.

This map highlights the economic North- South divide in the Chicago region which shows a legacy of disinvestment on the south and west side. A high rate of housing vacancy is coupled with lower median household incomes between the two rivers (Chicago river and Cal-Sag river)

GREEN AND BLUE INFRASTRUCTURE ECOLOGICAL OVERLAPS UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE GEOMORPHOLOGY WATERSHED AND FLOOD PRONE ZONE ECONOMIC DEMOGRAPHICS

PLACETYPES

Natural

Built

Where

Ecological Corridor

VISION

Fragmented natural systems need to be restitched to restore the Chicago region’s legacy of rich natural systems, promote coexistence between humans and nature, and catalyze Chicago’s New Nature - an ecology that responds to historical degradation and is innovatively positioned for urban use and resilient climate adaptation - through design, planning, and governance.

CONNECT ADAPT RESTORE

Connect islanded communities to nature and fragmented natural systems to each other.

Adapt the built environment to be multipurpose, meeting the needs of people, wildlife, and natural systems.

Green Roof Masterplan

Opportunity areas for green roof development and financial and tax incentive recommendations.

Restore natural edges and remove physical barriers to improve and conserve natural functions

Guiding Principles and Place-types Connection

GOALS

REGIONAL STRATERGIES

Reimagined Infrastructure Waterway Adjacencies

Re-imagined infrastrucure connections along abandoned and exisitng railway corridors and utility lines.

Opportunities and challenges along the river corridor.

Proposed landscapes and design recommendations.

corridors
nearby
and built systems that disrupt the city grid. Utility and industrial
shaping
land uses.
and natural systems in proximity to each other which influence one another and trigger
ripple
Natural areas that are cut off from their ecological point of origin but retain similar characteristics.
a
effect.
natural systems have been engineered resulting in changed functionality.
natural systems have been engineered resulting in changed functionality.
Where
Grid Disruptors Shifting Greys Dynamoscapes Engineered Landscapes Eco-Remnants Natural Spine Connect Adapt Restore

Reimagined Infrastructure

Our waterways connectivity plan repurposes the region’s waterways, including rivers, streams, and wetlands, into ecological hotspots that connect and protect wildlife and people. It also provides increased community access to these spaces, promoting a reconnection to the region’s nature. Using placetype-based prototypes, the plan addresses current challenges and creates a climate adaptation strategy for a stronger and more flexible Chicago region.

Continuous trail connection along the river corridor

Powerline right-of-ways repurposed as trail connections

Ecological restoration + conservation

Economic development: bluegreen industries + mixed-use development

Increased crossings for pedestrians + bikes

Climate mitigation zones

Green Roof Network

Our ecological green roof plan focuses on identifying suitable areas, such as industrial, institutional, and commercial buildings, for green roof installations. To maximize coverage, we set targets for the percentage of eligible roofs that should be covered by green roofs, considering their potential benefits such as reducing the urban heat island effect, improving air quality, and managing stormwater runoff.

Chicago’s industrial legacy has left behind a landscape with broken natural systems that were manipulated for industrial purposes. Infrastructure, particularly railways, divides both open spaces and neighborhoods. However, the interlaced systems of railways and power lines present an opportunity to create a 35-foot-wide green buffer that can be rewilded to connect wildlife and humans. This would utilize underutilized space within the right of ways and provide corridors of connectivity for both.

Waterway Adjacencies
Farming
Bio-diversity Recreational
Urban
Sponge

A vision for a resilient and vibrant chicago

The legacy of the Great Lakes Region is one of ecological abundance which has been challenged and disrupted by industrial and urban primacy. Fragmented natural systems need to be restitched to restore Chicago region’s legacy of rich natural systems, promote coexistence between humans and nature, and catalyze Chicago’s New Nature - an ecology that responds to historical degradation and is innovatively positioned for urban use and resilient climate adaptation - through design, planning, and governance.

Ecologically fragmented chicago

Chicago’s New Nature

Rewilding Nature

Improving Waterways

Restoring Wetlands

1.28 million people living in the ‘C’ impacted by Chicago’s New Nature

14,000+ acres

of new green space across the Green Roof Network

Building Green Industries

Connecting Trails

Increasing commumnity access

12,500+ acres

of remediated and rewilded land

2,000 miles

of newly connected ecological corridors

COMMUNITY DESIGN ENGAGEMENT

Urban Design

03

OUR 35TH

AN URBAN DESIGN PLAN FOR 35TH STREET, MCKINLEY PARK

MCKINLEY, ILLINOIS PROJECT LOCATION : SEMESTER : ROLE : WORK : GUIDE : DR. SEVIN YILDIZ

ACADEMIC (GROUP)

RESEARCH, CONCEPT, DESIGN, DRAWINGS, RENDERS, GRAPHICS

MCD - SUMMER SEMESTER 23’

DR.APRIL JACKSON

MERAV ARGOV

The 35th Street corridor is foundational to McKinley Park’s identity of community, culture, and resiliency. This project builds upon these values and fits within a larger, coordinated effort to make 35th Street better for all McKinley Park residents. In partnership with the McKinley Park Development Council (MPDC), Bridgeport Alliance, Coalition For A Better Chinese American Community (CBCAC), and international consulting firm Design Workshop, the UIC College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs Master of City Design program facilitated a community-led design process for a comprehensive corridor plan for 35th Street between Leavitt and Ashland.

GIS, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop, SketchUp, Vray

//
//
//
//
//
//
//
// Community
Planning
Mixed-use
Sustainability
Street Redesign
Prototyping // Research
Landscape

PROJECT PRINCIPLES

INCLUSIVITY:

Respect the neighborhood’s heritage and cultural identity

OUR 35TH

ENHANCED COMMUNITY INTERACTION and ENGAGEMENT:

Engage and collaborate with the local community

IMPROVED MOBILITY FOR WALKERS AND BIKERS:

Prioritize pedestrian and bikers safety through protected bike lanes, proper street lighting and active storefronts

LOCAL ENTERPRISE PROMOTION:

Create opportunities for diverse small businesses, local entrepreneurship, and cultural amenities

PROCESS

Through past planning efforts, the 35th Street corridor has been identified as a catalytic site for community and small business growth. In addition to conducting preliminary research on the corridor, our team organized engagement events at different neighborhood sites where community members gather, play, and work. These events led up to a design charrette, which brought together diverse community members to co-create ideas for improving the corridor. As the culmination of our research and community engagement, this project leverages existing assets, celebrates the neighborhood’s cultural diversity, and furthers connectivity and inclusivity.

CONCEPT

35th as a Neighborhood Main Street

The design concept conceptualizes 35th Street as McKinley Park’s bustling street with concentrations of activity at certain intersections from Archer to Ashland. Based on community feedback, the concept integrates elements of artactivated alleyways, a linear park, extended sidewalks, community spaces, pedestrian crossings, and food trucks. These strategic additions can help promote small business development and community well-being.

The 35th street will transform into the “Neighborhood Main Street”, becoming the go-to-destination for McKinley Park. The new street design promotes accessible and safe pedestrian mobility for pedestrians and cyclists. It expands dining and shopping options, as well as comfortable, outdoor spaces for people to gather and celebrate their community.

OUR VISION

The 35th Street corridor is McKinley Park’s vibrant, community-oriented main street anchored by strong local businesses, multimodal connectivity, and resilient infrastructure.

Pop-Up Event in McKinley Park (Front of Field House) Pop-Up Event in Playgarden Pop-Up Event On Memorial Day Parade (35th Street) Visioning Workshop

‘The Portal’

35th and Archer

The 35th and Archer intersection connects McKinley Park to the city through the CTA Orange Line and other transit options. Based on community feedback, this transit oriented development is a potential portal into and out of the neighborhood. The view shows a part of the parking lot being repurposed into a linear park to improve walking and biking connectivity surrounded by grab-and-go businesses. The sidewalks at the junction are extended, and the paving is modified to facilitate traffic calming. These interventions also respond to safety concerns related to road accidents, improving mobility around the L station.

‘Social Hub’

35th and Wolcott Ave

Housing the McKinley Park Library and the Walgreens store, this intersection is frequently visited by community members. The junction is envisioned as a “Social Hub” with multiple small businesses and flexible gathering spaces.

It repurposes the Walgreens parking lot as a station for food trucks with an extension into the library’s landscaped space. Wolcott Avenue is utilized as the Festival Street, which can host small street markets and block parties spanning 2 blocks in either direction from the McKinley Community Play Garden.

‘The Heart’

35th and Wood St

Adjacent to the Nathanael Greene Elementary School, the 35th and Wood intersection becomes an essential community space hosting a seasonal pop-up playground for all ages and a temporary performance area. Displaying the neighborhood’s diversity through public art on empty facades and providing space for cultural celebrations, the intersection embodies the heart of McKinley Park. Also, the bike lane on 35th Street links to the proposed bike network on Wood St, which stretches to the large park through 37th St. This redesign encourages casual meet-ups and community connections, while becoming a platform for cultural expression.

URBAN DESIGN

04

MADISON FOR EVERYONE

BLURRING EDGES

OAK PARK, ILLINOIS PROJECT LOCATION :

SEMESTER : ROLE : WORK : GUIDE :

ACADEMIC (GROUP)

RESEARCH, CONCEPT, DESIGN, DRAWINGS, RENDERS, GRAPHICS

MCD - FALL SEMESTER 22’

Prof. SANJEEV VIDYARTHI

Prof. VINAYAK BHARNE

This design project aims to propose solutions for revitalizing the commercial corridor of Madison Street in Oak Park, characterized by high vacancy rates and a drive-thru economy. The focus is on a 1.5mile stretch of the street between Harlem and Austin in a metropolitan region with diverse urban edges and socio-economic disparities.The goal is to blur the hard edge between Oak Park and Austin and activate the street’s commercial activities and character. Madison presents a unique opportunity to serve as a “community connector” between neighboring communities and within Oak Park itself. The project explores creating new identities for Madison, such as Madison-Med, Mix, and Made.

// Community // Form Based Coding // Planning // Mixed-use // Sustainability // Urban Design // Prototyping // Research // Landscape
GIS, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop, SketchUp, Vray

The approach involved a research-informed methodology, with community input informing the direction of the project. Statistical data was utilized to support tangible design approaches, while experts in specialized fields were consulted to gain a better understanding of the area

Initial Insights 01

Data gathered through a self-guided tour of the communinty, helped us guide investigations into local histories and people that animate madison.

Community Profile 02

It revealed the development trends, housing patterns, and transportation connections for considerations on Madison

Spatial Analysis 03

A closer look at Madison revealed additional asserts, opportunites and spatial charateristics to be addresses on the corridor.

Concepts, Criteria, and Constraints 04

By defining the problem, identifying opportunities for design repairs and setting a scope of work, the studio laid the groundwork for a comprehensive design

Design Proposal 05

Work for the design proposalbegan by establishing collective design values and vision. “Madison for Everyone Else” came together.

MADISONSTREET

Community Profile

An analysis of the census tracts surrounding Madison reveals that they have the lowest median household incomes, highest poverty rates, and highest unemployment rates in the community. Additionally, the western end of Madison is characterized by the lowest housing values, moderate rents, and high residential density.

Oak Park is headed towards a lack of affordability shown through high property taxes and increasing rents.

Lack of concentration of retail on Madison Street contributes to its status as a stagnant economy.

Oak Park is headed towards a lack of affordability shown through high property taxes and increasing rents.

OAKPARKAVENUE

Key Takeaways

The absence of a historic district and preservation sites along Madison Street results in a lack of identity for the corridor

MADISONSTREET

MADISONSTREET

MADISONSTREET

Transect Analysis

Zooming out from Oak Park, the transect analysis shows how the Madison corridor transforms from a downtown urban artery (and the start of Chicago’s North/South numbering system), to a newly developed commercial and office strip in the West Loop, and eventually transitioning into a neighborhood corridor.

Lack of concentration of retail on Madison Street contributes to its status as a stagnant economy.

Vision: Madison for Everyone else

Madison Street has a lack of pedestrian infastructure, the streetscape doesn't as to support community building.

Oak Park is headed towards a lack of affordability shown through high property taxes and increasing rents.

The absence of a historic district and preservation sites along Madison Street results in a lack of identity for the corridor

Lack of concentration of retail on Madison Street contributes to its status as a stagnant economy.

Madison Street has a lack of pedestrian infastructure, the streetscape doesn't as to support community building.

Oak Park is headed towards a lack of affordability shown through high property taxes and increasing rents.

The absence

STREET
OAKPARKAVENUE
of a historic district
OAKPARKAVENUE
OAK Planning Making Process and Methord
Context

Macro Planning

Madison Street differs from Oak Park in terms of racial and economic demographics, architecture, housing patterns, and retail options. Instead of presenting Madison as a problem that needs fixing, the ideas proposed in this report aim to celebrate and cherish the unique and diverse mix of people, places, and properties that already exist within the corridor. If Oak Park is for “everyone,” then Madison can be for “everyone else.”

What are we designing

In examining Madison Street within a broader context, we have identified its relationships with the surrounding urban realm. The diagrams specifically highlight the existing downtowns and open space systems that shape the edges of Forest Park and Austin, as well as the impact of Madison’s distance from the CTA Green and Blue Line stations. Additionally, we have identified specific notable assets on the corridor, such as blockchain retail, public institutions, and senior living facilities.

Intersections

Building Typologies- Form Based Codes

These proposed building typologies respond to different parcel sizes and building heights, in line with the project goals. Each proposal is based on an average of three parcel sizes commonly found on Madison: 50’x120’, 120’x100’, and 200’x120’. The northern and southern blocks adjacent to Madison have distinct building characteristics, with 45’ multifamily housing zoned to the north and 30’ single-family homes zoned directly to the south.

MADISONST MADISONST

ALLEY <15 ft

ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY <15 ft 30 ft 50 ft

MADISONST MADISONST

<25 ft 30 ft

80 ft 20 ft ~60% ~60% ~60%

ALLEY ALLEY

ALLEY ALLEY

MADISONST MADISONST

<25 ft 30 ft

<15 ft

<15 ft 50 ft <15 ft 30 ft 50 ft

<15 ft 50 ft

~25% ~20% ~20% ~15% ~15% ~10%

80 ft 20 ft ~60% ~60% ~60%

~25% ~20% ~20% ~15% ~15% ~10%

Med draws inspiration from the RUSH Oak Park hospital, on the western edge.

On Madison Med, design interventions like public handrails, tactile crosswalks, outdoor fitness equipment, and information kiosks serve aging residents and pedestrians with specific mobility and safety needs.

Mix is in reference to the wide range of parcel sizes, land uses, and building types in the center of the corridor.

On Madison Mix, design interventions like group seating, playful social spaces, waiting spaces for school children, and patterned crosswalks help bring a diverse range of people and activities together to strengthen community and infuse a sense of dynamism into the corridor.

Made honors the significant number of small, historically Black-owned businesses on the eastern edge.

On Madison Made, expanded sidewalk space for outdoor retail amenities, parking spots at bus bulbs, popup market spaces along buffer zones, color-coded signage, and patterned crosswalks that bridge north and south sides of the street invite foot traffic to promote local businesses.

MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. Residential Parcel Commercial Parking MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. Residential Parcel Commercial Parking MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. Residential Parcel Commercial Parking 100ft 120 120 200 ft 50ft 120 50*120 Parcel MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. 100*120 Parcel 200*120 Parcel 100ft 120 ft 120 ft 200 50ft 120 ft 100ft 120 120 200 ft 50ft 120 Residential Parcel Commercial Parking 100ft 120 ft 120 ft 200 50ft 120 ft 50*120 Parcel MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. 100*120 Parcel 200*120 Parcel 100ft 120 120 200 ft 50ft 120 100ft 120 ft 120 ft 200 50ft 120 ft Residential Parcel Commercial Parking 100ft 120 120 200 50ft 120 50*120 Parcel MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. MadisonSt. 100*120 Parcel 200*120 Parcel 100ft 120 ft 120 ft 200 50ft 120 ft 100ft 120 120 200 50ft 120 Residential Parcel Commercial Parking Common Space Common Space Common Space MADISONST MADISONST MADISONST MADISONST ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY Building Typology Setback North Side South Side Intersection 100ft 120 ft 120 200 50ft 120 ft 50*120 Parcel 100*120 Parcel 200*120 Parcel 0' offset is not allowed unless granted special privilege • Minimum 5' offset on the front, right and left side of the parcel Minimum 10' offset on the back of the parcel • 0' offset is not allowed unless granted special privilege • Minimum 10' offset on the front, right and left side of the parcel • Minimum 15' offset on the back of the parcel • 0' offset is not allowed unless granted special privilege • Minimum 15' offset on the front, right and left side of the parcel • Minimum 20' offset on the back of the parcel • Maximum building height is 50' and minimum to be maintained is 30'. Building mass above 30' is to be pulled back 15' minimum from the back of the parcel line. Maximum building height is 50' and minimum to be maintained is 30'. • Building mass above 20' is to be pulled back 15' minimum from North Side South Side North Side South Side Residential % of Built up area % of Built up area % of Built up area Commercial Parking Residential Commercial Parking Residential Commercial Parking Maximum building height is 80' • Building mass above 30' is to be pulled back 15' from the back of the parcel line Building mass above 50' is to be pulled back 25' from the back of the parcel line 100ft 120 ft 120 200 50ft 120 ft 100ft 120 ft 120 200 50ft 120 ft MADISONST MADISONST MADISONST MADISONST ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY MADISONST MADISONST MADISONST MADISONST ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY <15 ft 30 ft 50 ft <15 ft <25 ft 30 ft 80 ft 20 ft ~60% ~60% ~60% ~25% ~20% ~20% ~15% ~15% ~10% <15 ft 50 ft <15 ft 30 ft 50 ft <15 ft <25 ft 30 ft 80 ft 20 ft ~60% ~60% ~60% ~25% ~20% ~20% ~15% ~15% ~10% <15 ft 50 ft <15 ft 30 ft 50 ft <15 ft <25 ft 30 ft 80 ft 20 ft ~60% ~60% ~60% ~25% ~20% ~20% ~15% ~15% ~10% <15 ft 50 ft <15 ft 30 ft 50 ft <15 ft <25 ft 30 ft 80 ft 20 ft ~60% ~60% ~60% ~25% ~20% ~20% ~15% ~15% ~10% <15 ft 50 ft
MADISONST MADISONST

URBAN ANALYSIS

05

20 MIN DOWNTOWN

URBAN TISSUE ANALYSIS

PROJECT TYPE :

PROJECT LOCATION : SEMESTER : DATE :

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

ROLE : WORK : GUIDE :

Urban Analysis

Research

RESEARCH, DOCUMENTATION AND ANALYSIS

ACADEMIC (INDIVIDUAL)

RESEACH,CONCEPT,DESIGN,DOCUMENTATION, GRAPHICS

MCD - FALL SEMESTER 22’

DEC, 2022

DR. SEVIN YILDIZ

This analysis focuses on the ‘20 MIN DOWNTOWN’ concept as a way to evaluate the livability and accessibility of a city’s downtown core. The study aims to determine if the core has been designed to be a successful model of livability and if it enables pedestrians to access all the amenities and activities of the dense urban fabric. Through a three-level analysis (macro, meso, and micro), the investigation found that Chicago’s downtown core, ‘The LOOP,’ is accessible in under 20 minutes and offers a diverse range of experiences. The analysis used visual guidance for walking exploration, creating a layout that can be applied to any downtown area in any city.

GIS, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop, Lightroom

//
//
// Planning
// Prototyping

METHOD 1

INTRODUCTION

Cities are dynamic systems made for people to inhabit and generate unique experiences. Walking is the most common and accessible mode of experiencing a city. We focus on Downtown and its core to analyze livability through walking.

METHOD 1

METHOD 2

METHOD 3

We shall look at the whole site that is the ‘LOOP’ and create a matrix for all the major type of activites that are present and the rate them on the basic of how accessible they are from this area and how much footfall does each section experience.

We shall look at the Streets individually. Here we will mark the type of path and analyis the charater of the street North- South and East-West Streets will be analyzed differently.

We shall look at the street level visual guidance for the pedestrian that helps them to navigate and walk toward the desired destination or activity, adding to the Walkability aspect of the space.

The major types of activities in the downtown area are divided into seven zones, and their percentage impact is represented in a radial graph by the area they occupy, corresponding to their actual percentage area in the downtown.

ACCESSIBILITY LINK

Direct

The direct link examines the immediate or neighboring use spaces that are associated with one another, revealing how their movement patterns affect the use of the space and how different zones connect to one another.

- Level of the Street

- Movement pattern - Time to travel

- Street Edge Condition - Vibe

- Crosswalk - Signals - Signages - Sidewalks

TOOLS
Condition scale Condition scale
of Activity
- Footfall
- Type
- Accessiblity
SITE
S Wells St. S La Salle St. S Clark St. S Dearborn St. S State St. S Wabash St. S Michigan Ave. DOWNTOWN DOWNTOWN-CORE W Lake St. W Randolph St. W Washington St. W Madison St. W Monroe St. W Adams St. W Jackson St. W VanBuren St. Chicago, Illinois THE LOOP
The impact on all seven zones is measured by their visual presence and the activities they host. This rating system allows us to identify the most active areas and the zones with the highest footfall. By analyzing this data, we can determine which zones are most impactful for a user within a 20-minute walk. IMPACT SCALE Low Moderate High 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TRANSPORT LAKEFRONT ZONES PERCENTAGE 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % ENTERTAINMENT SHOPPING BUSINESS RECREATIONAL RETAIL % % % % % % % LAKE FRONT ENTERTAINMENT SHOPPING BUSINESS RECREATIONAL RETAIL BUSES TRAINS BICYCLES TAXIS 20 MIN 3 6 8 9 9 7 6 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
IMPACT Low Moderate High 0-10 % % % 10-30 % 30% or higher %
PERCENTAGE

The Street Character Analysis examines the relationship between building edges and streets/sidewalks to provide insight into the walkability of the area.

Matrix Indicator

- Linear - Non-linear

Level of the Street - Underground - On ground - Above ground - Good - Average - Poor

Chicago has multiple levels in the city and downtown you can only expect it to be more layered. So indicating the layer of street interacted is important.

Movement pattern

Chicago downtow is layed out in grid so there is no much non-linear movement. One can still move diagonally is the subject of intrest is such.

Condition Vibe P A G 9

Chicago’s conditions are measured on the basis of the porosity,materiality and the offset spaces created on the building edgeline where the space is being used for public

The vibe of the street is a intangible but its measure in relation to Street Condition, Time and Legibility of the space.

of the Street On ground

W

WEST - EAST direction streets in downtown core area for walkability measurement of 20 min and activities.

METHOD

2 3

Street Walkability Element Analysis

The Street Walkability Element Analysis focuses on the streets and sidewalks in terms of the placement of elements that guide pedestrians visually and aid in their navigation from one location to another. This analysis is crucial for forming a comprehensive understanding of the streets and their legibility for the purpose of walkability.

Departments

Crosswalk Signal Signages

All Rating in each department

Low

Moderate Moderate

High High

9

9

A

9 9 9 4

Blue Line- Inclusion of Transit facilities onto the sidewalk and merging the on-ground and underground levels of the city.

8 5 6
7 Crosswalk Signal Signages Sidewalk
street
Sidewalk hear creates a good buffer zone and all the other elements for the walkablility aspect are visible but could have been enhanced to cater better to the pedestrians visting here for first time. S Dearborn
junction on the West - East axis,
St.
METHOD
Linear
9 Distance
Vibe
S Dearborn St. Level
0.68 Miles
17 Mins
Movement pattern Time to Travel Street Edge Condition
G
Street Charater Analysis
8
5
6 6 2 2 7 7
3
10
Street
Edge
8
5
1 1
3
4 4
10
Low
A public seating space Included just next to the side walk, keeping in mind the activities of the surrounding spaces and building
opening up to create a
in-between spaces.
Sidewalk CTA
Plaza.
edge
good
A green buffer spaces included in-between and on the edges of the side adds to the visual beautification and also contributes enviornmentally. The streets feel much more lively and vibe is overall enhanced.
Monroe St.
of the Street Distance Movement pattern
Travel
Edge Condition Vibe 6
ground 0.48
13
St. KEY MAP
Dearborn St.
A service infrastructure incorporated onto the sidewalk near the junction area, narrow downs the walkable area and cause a hindrance visually, physically and add to the congestion of the space.
Level
Time to
Street
On
Miles Linear
Mins A W Monroe
S
NORTH- SOUTH direction streets in downtown core area for walkability measurement of 20 min and activities.

URBAN RESEARCH PUBLICATION

06

(RE) CODING MUMBAI

RESEARCH AND DOCUMENTATION OF MUMBAI STREETS AND BUILD TYPOLOGIES

PROJECT TYPE :

ROLE :

PROJECT LOCATION : DATE :

MUMBAI, INDIA

RESEARCH AND DOCUMENTATION

MEMBER : FIRM :

RAVI, NIRAV, SHAIBA. RAHUL, RIKUNJ

RESEACH, DOCUNEMTATION, GRAPHICS.

MAY-JUNE, 2017.

sPare. (Sameep Padora and associates).

The research and documention was done at firm sP+A under the research wing sPare for publication.

The DCR (Development Control Regulations) primarily prioritizes road widening codes and overlooks pedestrian needs. While automobiles are important, we cannot overlook the importance of pedestrians. Instead we should reconsider their potential and create some space within the DCR to facilitate their revival where necessary. We need to make room for streets once again, giving equal consideration to pedestrians and automobiles, in order to ensure a balanced and sustainable urban development.

// Community // Planning // Adaptive reuse // Mixed-use // Urban Analysis // Prototyping // Research // Documentation // Publication
Autocad, Revit, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop

I participated in a research and documentation project with sPare, which divided volunteers into teams to document different types of structures and roads in Mumbai that have unique typologies and reflect the city’s urbanization. These structures and roads serve as markers in time and space, recording anomalies and slippages in the general set of logics operating within the urban field. They also present potential ideas or types that can be deployed within contemporary urban contexts.

These five streets were surrounded by different neighborhoods and cultural contexts, yet they were part of the same area. Therefore, the complexity of the streets’ nature was key to making further analysis possible. Each street already had a unique established character in the urban fabric, combined with its neighborhood. My role in this project was to document these relationships and different types of streets in Bandra, Mumbai. This documentation involved representing them with different styles of drawing such as plans, sections, isometric sections, and creating a comparative analysis between them to understand and enhance their characteristics.

STREET DOCUMENTATION ANALYSIS

Photodocumentation higlighting street infrastructures and areas of concern, regarding re-planning and arrangements.

1. Informal shops on footpath

2. Under utilized edge condition

3. Absence of footpath

4. Absence of zebra crossing

5. Degenerated median condition

6. Reduced effective street width due to encroachment, hawkers and parking

STREETS DOCUMENTATION TYPOLOGY DOCUMENTATION
Dinanath Mangesh Hall, Vile Parle Candies, Bandra STATION ROAD LINKING ROAD CARTER ROAD CHIMBAI ROAD PALI VILLAGE Isometric View of the streets
1 2 3 5 Near the Junction of Linking Road and Secondary Road 4 5 6 Linking Road middle plaza node 1 2 4 5 Near the Linking Road Market signal

The

The

The street is characterised by the commercial shops which are present on the edge of the road

The street is a two way vehicular road with heavy traffic as it recieves traffic from adjacent collector road

LIKNKING

EDGE CONDITIONS BUILT FORM AND ADJACENT TYPOLOGIES SPACE UTILIZATION STREET ELEMENTS STREET WIDTH VEHICULAR TRAFFIC MORNING MORNING EVENING EVENING NOON NOON PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC TRAFFIC PATTERN TIME
pedestrian traffic is predominantly high durning the evening due to the roadside eateries and shopping programs. It is a high traffic zone as the vehicular traffic is high almost throughout the day. XX vehicles/m2 XX vehicles/m2 XX vehicles/m2 XX persons/m2 XX persons/m2 XX persons/m2 - XX min TIME FROM A to B : - XX mins MIXED USE COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL EATERIES SHOPS PARK NG SPACE MOVEMENT 183M
120 M A B ARTERIAL ROAD COLLECTOR ROAD COLLECTORROAD TWO WAY ROAD TWO WAY ROAD TWOWAYROAD
The
177M
street is
arterial road
the edges of the street are defined by the collector roads which branch out from the street.
an
and
width of the street varies at different sections of the street but is approximately 18m wide and carries heavy traffic. Out of the total street space, 60% is used for movement of vehicles. 30% is used by shops and eateries. 10 % is used by the pedestrians.
ANALYSIS o 2.5M 5M 10M SCALE 1:200
PROMENADE
BUILDING Isometric View KEY PLAN CARTER ROAD, BANDRA o 2.5M 5M 10M SCALE 1:200
ROAD, BANDRA FOOTPATH
COMPLEX Isometric View
PLAN
STREET
FOOTPATH
RESIDENTIAL
LINKING
COMMERCIAL
KEY
ROAD,
ROAD,
BANDRA LINKING
BANDRA
docs/ravi_thakker_portfolio_2022
Portfolio https://issuu.com/ravithakker/docs/ ravi_thakker_graphic_design_portfolio Graphic Design Portfolio https://www.instagram. com/artyst.studio/ Product Design Studio University of Illinois, Chicago - Master of City Design ’23 Aditya College of Architecture - Bachelor Of Architecture ‘19 ar.ravithakker@gmail.com rthakk23@uic.edu
https://issuu.com/ravithakker/
Architectural

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.