Saker Falcon research and Conservation in Mongolia

Page 1

Saker Falcon research and Conservation in Mongolia

Batbayar Galtbalt1, Nyambayar Batbayar1 Andrew Dixon2, Lutfor Rahman2, 1Wildlife Science & Conservation Center 2International Wildlife Consultants


Saker Conservation Status • Globally Endangered EN (IUCN/BirdLife) • Appendix II (CITES) • Appendix I (CMS; except Mongolia)


Population Trends REGION

POPULATION

% GLOBAL POP.

TREND

Europe & Middle East

825

8%

Increasing

Central Asia (ex. USSR)

1330

13%

Declining

Russia

1972

19%

Declining

Mongolia

3464

33%

Stable/Increasing*

China

2851

27%

(Declining)

Based on data used for 2012 IUCN listing MONGOLIA HOLDS 1 in 3 SAKERS IN THE WORLD


Causes of population declines Central Asia (ex. USSR) / Russia / China • • • • • • • •

Loss and degradation of steppes through agricultural intensification, abandonment, desertification (climate change) Forestry operations Decline in key prey species (through habitat change and direct eradication) Trapping adults and/or nest robbery for falconry Persecution Pesticides and pollution (direct poisoning) Electrocution Expansion of settlements and industrial operations (mineral extraction)

Importance of each threat can vary temporally and spatially Demographic mechanism driving declines poorly understood


Falconry: Arabic cultural heritage • • • • •

UAE Saudi Arabia Kuwait Qatar Bahrain


Trade Demand • Wild‐source (legal CITES trade) • Wild‐source (illegal, smuggling) • Captive‐bred

SAKER

GYRFALCON

PEREGRINE


Mongolian Saker Falcon exports Year

Saudi Arabia

Kuwait

Qatar

UAE

Syria

USA

Germany

Total

1997

116

29

0

5

0

0

0

150

1998

0

25

0

0

0

0

0

25

1999

0

40

0

21

0

0

0

61

2000

0

50

0

0

0

0

0

50

2001

0

102

0

75

10

0

0

187

2002

87

121

15

0

75

5

15

318

2003

85

171

82

10

54

0

0

402

2004

77

180

49

30

49

0

0

385

2005

151

131

5

0

73

0

0

360

2006

100

41

26

0

0

0

0

167

2007

60

141

40

0

0

0

0

241

2008

30

185

51

0

0

0

0

266

2009

25

151

81

35

0

0

0

292

2010

0

105

88

44

0

0

0

237

Total

731

1472

437

220

261

5

15

3141

Quota: No scientific basis Harvest: No regulation or reporting Cannot meet CITES “no detriment” criterion


Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 1. Sustainable use of wildlife resources 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

MONGOLIAN PROJECT Managed & monitored population (basis of harvest quota) Regulated & monitored harvest Equitable community benefits (income, employment, education) Conservation benefit (compensate off‐take, excess productivity) Sustainable (income from falcon trade)

2. Fair & equitable distribution of benefits 3. Conservation of biodiversity


SAKER FALCON Widespread in Mongolia • Desert • Desert‐steppe • Steppe • Forest steppe


Desert


Desert steppe


Forest steppe


Steppe



Calculating a harvest quota PRODUCTIVITY (Rahman et al., submitted) Number of nests (observation) Nesting success (86% ± 4% ; MARK nest survival model) 3.7 ± 0.2 chicks/successful nest Mean fledglings/successful nest

Mean fledglings per successful nest

• •

5.0 5

4.5

9

10 10

12

7 10

4.0

14 4

3.5 4

3.0 2.5 2.0 2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

Survival during post‐fledging dependence period 84% ± 10% Mean juveniles surviving to dispersal

Mean number of juveniles

3.5

3.35

3.0 2.69 2.5

2.35

2.0 1.76

2.02

1.5 1.0

1.18

Natural

Artificial

2011


Calculating a harvest quota SURVIVAL (on‐going research) • •

Annual adult survival (breeding turn‐over) Breeding dispersal (among artificial nest grids) Genetic database

• •

Juvenile survival (recruitment) Natal dispersal (among artificial nest grids) Genetic database

Mean number of juveniles

3.5

3.35

3.0 2.69 2.5

2.35

2.0 1.76

2.02

1.5 1.0

1.18

Natural

Artificial


Breeding pairs

Artificial nest monitoring 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

Falco cherrug Falco tinnunculus Buteo hemilasius Corvus corax

2011

2012

2013


Breeding pairs

Artificial nest monitoring 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

Falco cherrug Falco tinnunculus Buteo hemilasius Corvus corax

2011

2012

2013

2014

More than 2500 chicks have been ringed in 2014


Breeding pairs

Artificial nest monitoring 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

574

760

380

Falco tinnunculus Buteo hemilasius Corvus corax

200

2011

Falco cherrug

2012

2013

2014

More than 2500 chicks have been ringed in 2014


Saker ~760 Kestrel ~1122 Upland Buzzard ~422 Raven ~348 Occupied nests ~2653 (~75%)


Ring Recovery Fledged in Bayanmunkh 4955 13 May 2013

Bred in Uulbayan 3675 13 May 2014

Dispersal = East 190 km


Natal Philopatry/dipersal

Fledged in Khalzan 3300, 17 May 2013

Dispersal = NNW 35km

J34 Bred in Uulbayan 3748


Response to prey availability ?


Saker breeding pairs in 2011

200 BP


Saker breeding pairs in 2012

380 BP


Saker breeding pairs in 2013

574 BP


Saker breeding pairs in 2014

~

760 BP


2

Breeding pairs 2011 ‐ 177 2012 ‐ 298 2013 ‐ 383 2014 ‐ 422


Findings

Breeding pairs 2011 ‐ 83 2012 ‐ 905 2013 ‐ 1364 2014 ‐ 1122


Raven – Herder conflict XXXX breeding pairs

How important is livestock in ravens’ DIET ? Can we remove raven nests ?

Breeding pairs 2011 ‐ 171 2012 ‐ 269 2013 ‐ 386 2014 ‐ 348


Electrocution !!!


Electricity Network in Mongolia


15 kV ‘dangerous’ lines Line poles

Anchor poles


2009‐12 line surveys

12‐13 May 2009 7 September 2011 8 March 2012 Monkhkhaan‐Uulbayan 15 kV 56 km N poles: 493 line, 35 anchor 111 carcasses

Dixon et al. 2013. Bird Conservation International 23: 520‐529


2009‐12 line survey Line Pole

Line Pole (1‐2 spikes) Line Pole (3‐4 spikes)

7.7%

10.8% P = 0.16

2.7% P < 0.001

Dixon et al. 2013. Bird Conservation International 23: 520‐529


2009 line survey Anchor Pole

Anchor Pole

(jumpwire over crossarm on

(jumpwire over crossarm on

3 phases)

central phase)

22.0%

4.8%

P = 0.02

Dixon et al. 2013. Bird Conservation International 23: 520‐529


2012 line monitoring

11 May 25 May 04 June 16 June 01 July 20 July 101 Carcasses


Small mammal hole counts N active holes within 20 m radius

t = 15.61, df = 361.74, P <0.001 Break point analysis, package ‘segmented’


Mammal density & mitigation

Models Intercept + small mammals + N deflectors Intercept + N deflectors Intercept + small mammals Intercept

df 4 3 3 2

AICc 560.0 562.1 562.3 563.9

∆ AICc 0.00 2.09 2.30 3.90

wi 0.55 0.19 0.18 0.08

Electrocution events were most frequent where small mammal availability was high and the number of perch deflector spikes was lower


2013‐14 line monitoring

439 surveys 01 April 2013 to 14 August 2014 434 Carcasses



How widespread is Saker Falcon electrocution in Mongolia?


Preliminary Survey Results 2013

2014

27 lines (44% of 15 kV in Mongolia)

26 lines (42% of 15 kV in Mongolia)

277 carcasses

513 carcasses

50 Saker Falcons (18%)

342 Saker Falcons (67%)


14 identical lines

2013

2014

201 carcasses

214 carcasses

43 Saker Falcons (21%)

115 Saker Falcons (54%)


SAKER ELECTROCUTION IN MONGOLIA

Widespread Large numbers Prey abundance Prey distribution Spatial variation Temporal variation Predictive models – Prioritization


1‐year mitigation trial (21 Aug 2013‐15 Aug 2014) Line divided into 24 sections of 14‐18 poles Control Phase 1: Mount Phase 1: Insulation Phases 2 & 3: Brush deflector Phases 2 & 3: Mirror deflector Phases 2 & 3: Insulation


Phase 1 mitigation

Control

Insulation

Arch pin‐mount


Phases 2 & 3 mitigation Control

Insulation

Mirror deflectors

Brush deflectors







Efficacy & Cost

~ 40’000 MNT per pole Fixing single line (~500 poles) = 20 million MNT

Phase 1: New mounts (15000 MNT) Phases 2/3: Deflector spikes (20’000 MNT)


Reccomendation • Work together to solve the problem in different levels • To set criteria in EIA to implement safe design and mitigation measures in the project – for future or planned lines • Spend allocated annual maintenance and mitigation budget for EFFECTIVE MEASURES – for already erected lines • If there are luck of funding for this measures, look at alternative sources.,


Conservation

Sustainable Use

v.

Protection & Enforcement


Thank You


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.