12 minute read

PROFILE: Keith Rosser

Next Article
Tech & Tools

Tech & Tools

MAKING THE WORLD OF WORK SAFER

Keith Rosser, director at Reed Screening, believes Right to Work checks and hiring must become more digital to increase the safety for workers and jobseekers. Sue Weekes reports

When Recruiter caught up with Keith Rosser, group director of recruitment business, Reed, and director of Reed Screening, he had just fi nished speaking to MPs about the need for digital Right to Work checks to remain in place after the pandemic. Rosser played a decisive role in the campaign to get the digital checks extended until 1 September when, at the time of writing, the plan is for them to revert to physical checks.

“Right to Work is going backwards,” he says. “We’ve got this new-found fl exible or hybrid remote working model, which sees people in Cornwall working for an IT fi rm in Manchester, so it’s simply not practical to go back to physical checks.”

Rosser’s overarching mission is to make the world of work safer for workers, jobseekers and employers. To achieve this, he contends hiring must become more digital. And there is also an economic imperative for this to happen. “We’re about to embark on a post-lockdown labour market, and the things we need to underpin seamless recruitment aren’t in place yet,” he says.

Continuing, he says: “We need to be able to validate people’s credentials digitally whether that be via blockchain or some other method. We have an outdated way of supporting hiring and recruitment in the UK and we need to change that after Covid, which is why I’m pushing the digital hiring agenda.”

Rosser’s own credentials to lead such campaigns as well as defi ne and implement this digital future are top-class. Reed Screening, established in 2011, has grown into one of the UK’s largest screening organisations and runs as a separate business. It provides employment background checks on permanent and supply workers for a range of companies and sectors, as well as Reed clients. He is also responsible for Reed Group’s risk and corporate governance agenda, sitting on the audit and risk committee at board level.

While these are the day jobs, he wears a number of diff erent hats that help to further the cause, including being chair of the Better Hiring Institute (BHI). Set up as a partnership between the UK government and industry, the BHI aims to help modernise hiring, steer ethical hiring and develop digital pathways. Its advisory board includes the Disclosure & Barring Service (DBS) and Cifas, the non-profi t that aims to reduce and prevent fraud and fi nancial crime in the UK, of which Rosser is also an advisory board member.

He is also a council member of the European global pre-employment vetting trade association, the PBSA (Professional Background Screening Association), and chair of the

“We have an outdated way of supporting hiring and recruitment in the UK and we need to change that after Covid”

Criminal Records Trade Body (CRTB). In addition, he is chair of JobsAware, a charity founded by the Metropolitan Police that tackles labour market exploitation targeting vulnerable workers.

Supporting digital hiring

To push the digital hiring agenda, Rosser knows he is up against a chequered landscape when it comes to the use of digital tools that support hiring and screening. “As well as plans for Right to Work to go back to physical checks and the problems this brings, we’ve also got the issue of employment blackspots. So, people who live in areas where there’s low employment won’t have physical offi ces to go and get a job in. Th en you’ve got things like qualifi cation checks: you can’t really say it’s technology-driven if someone emails a certifi cate. Referencing is tech-enabled, in some cases, but you still have a lot of people doing it the old-fashioned way and phoning people up.”

Th ere are pockets of more progressive practices with Disclosure Scotland, at which Rosser has served fi ve years as a non-executive director, having gone digital but this is by no means the norm.

Unless the shift to more digital processes and mindsets is made, there is no doubt in Rosser’s mind that the UK is storing up serious labour market problems for the future. Employers will fi nd it faster, easier and cheaper to hire non-UK nationals, who are able to validate themselves to work digitally online. “So, you’ll have this imbalance in the labour market. In addition, we’ll have an even bigger problem with skills shortages because people can’t be recruited fast enough.”

Rosser has no shortage of ideas or projects in mind and underway to enable digital hiring. He advocates a Right to Work system that enables employers to validate whether a British or Irish passport is accurate with the Passport Offi ce. For education credentialling, he is involved in a project with the Open University and a tech start-up to explore the use of a system that educationalists can use for free to validate school, college and university qualifi cations, that private sector training providers could use for free to validate qualifi cations, while employers would pay a small transactional fee to use it. Another approach could involve a digital wallet that the employer pays to access.

“A lot of these people will have non-normalised CVs with gaps in them”

Two steps for change

Rosser reckons bringing about the required change will mean a two-step process. Step one is to realise “digital hiring lite” – so interviewing a person online, off ering them the job and screening them digitally before physically meeting them. Step two is taking this as a base and turning it into a fully eff ective digitised process using, perhaps, a distributed ledger technology such as blockchain or similar. Unless step one is achieved within a calendar year, he fears the UK will lose competitive edge. “If we are to build back better and compete internationally, we’ve got to be able to do this in a year,” he says. “We’ve heard from global employers who say that if they’re going to have to go back to physical documents, they’ll move the jobs out of the UK because it’s easier for them recruit from outside.”

He goes on to say: “Th e timeline for ambition two is more like fi ve years away because of the massive diff erent datasets and diff erent government departments involved to bring it altogether in a coherent process.”

Rosser acknowledges that the use of technology has potential downsides and stresses how ethical hiring priorities must be embedded into digital processes. Th is is particularly pertinent to any discussion on non-normalised careers and how these might be adversely impacted by any kind of fi ltering technology. Th is understanding stems from another role he holds – chair of Release Scotland, which works with the Scottish Government on criminal record reforms and helping those with convictions fi nd work.

“A lot of these people will have non-normalised CVs with gaps in them and what we worry about is that the rise of technology makes it even harder for them to enter the labour market,” he says, adding that he continues to be amazed that recruitment is still “clinging on to things like CVs”.

In his view, a job advert should present the set of skills, experience, competencies that the organisation

Making the world of work a safer place continues to drive Rosser

Rosser’s returnto-office model will be a flexible, hybrid one

70%

Fake job adverts increased by 70% during the pandemic needs and a job application should be a response to how the individual meets them. “A CV is pretty irrelevant now,” he says.

It isn’t just in the area of tools and processes that hiring needs to evolve but also the bigger picture, believes Rosser, highlighting how legislation related to recruitment agencies was fi rst written in 1973 at a time when the industry was more about cards in shop windows than what it is today. Th e regulatory position around ‘What is a recruiter?’ is another area of focus for him and, with the rise of technology, the questions of ‘What are an app and a platform?’ must be considered in a recruiting context.

He has been in discussion about what future recruitment agency legislation might look like with Labour Market Enforcement offi cials and the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, and warns that increased digitisation could fi nd a marketplace that is off shored, with recruitment operations eff ectively platforms. “So, what will they be regulating?” he asks.

“With my JobsAware hat on, I think the Employment Bill [Editor’s note: this Bill does not yet exist] is a big opportunity to make sure that we’re balancing the progress of technology without eroding worker rights. Th ere is a scenario in my mind that a recruitment app, for instance based in Germany, is operating in the UK and placing people into work with a disguised employment relationship, where it isn’t clear to the worker who their employer is or what their rights are. Th e legislation needs to be future-proofed.”

Like many, Rosser has fi rst-hand experience of living in the new world of work. He’s welcomed the additional quality time lockdown has given him with his three young children, although admits being on Microsoft Teams for a meeting while a home learning class is also taking place can have its challenges. He lives in Glasgow and with Reed Screening’s offi ce in Manchester, his return-to-offi ce model will be a fl exible, hybrid one.

As well as his various hats, he’s keen to highlight the rise of recruitment scams, ranging from fake job adverts (which increased by 70% during the pandemic) designed to extract personal information from jobseekers or in some cases money in exchange for a uniform or training. Also on the rise, he says, is fraud by contractors against recruitment agencies.

His motivation to make the world of work a safer place for everyone will continue to drive him – and the more hats he wears, he believes, the more likely he is to achieve his aims: “Could I achieve as much if I was only at Reed? I think it would be more diffi cult. Could I achieve as much without Reed? I also think it would be more diffi cult.” ●

Advertisement Feature

FCSA launches revised Codes of Compliance

What does that mean for agencies and contractors?

The UK’s leading membership organisation for compliant payroll intermediary providers, the Freelancer & Contractor Services Association (FCSA) has announced the launch of revised Codes of Compliance (the “Codes”), outlining the most rigorous industry standards expected from member firms.

This latest comprehensive review has made them tougher and even more transparent providing added assurance for agencies, end hirers, and contractors. Extending to over 540 areas of evidence-based assessment, the FCSA Codes continue to set the benchmark for best practice compliance and ethical standards in the industry.

“As market conditions change so too must our Codes. This is to ensure the highest standards of compliance are continued to be met by our member firms. Which is why now, we’re announcing the launch of our latest Code revisions,” said FCSA Chief Executive, Phil Pluck when commenting on this latest Code review.

The FCSA Codes – what’s changed?

The Codes now provide greater

transparency on the financial illustrations

that our member firms need to provide to contractors.

Member firms are required to provide greater transparency regarding holiday pay in every umbrella employment contract and payslip.

Members must also submit independently

audited accounts.

In addition, the FCSA has also introduced new pre-requisite and due diligence checks on all new applicants that they must pass before proceeding to the accreditation assessment stage.

“We are grateful to our independent assessors

Ernst & Young, Saffery Champness, BDO,

Brabners, and JMW who contributed to this review and provided the expert challenge that give the Codes the rigour they need. And, of course for the engagement we received from HMRC, BEIS, and industry-leading trade bodies who we consulted with during this process,” added Phil.

“The most comprehensive and compliant set of evidencebased standards now exist in our sector. No one else in the sector can give agencies, end hirers, or contractors this level of assurance.” What makes FCSA accreditation unique?

Members adhere to rigorous ethical standards assessed against published Codes Independently tested by regulated chartered accountants, tax specialists and solicitors with vast expertise in the sector Members are required to demonstrate compliance annually Commit to the FCSA Charter

Non-compliance by FCSA members will result in suspension or termination FCSA is a firmly established not-for-profit accreditation body CEO is appointed by the members and is independent, with no commercial conflict of interest

The only compliance standard to be recognised by the UK’s leading recruitment trade bodies REC, APSCo, and TEAM.

How this applies to new applicants and current members

The revised FCSA Codes will apply to all new applicants from the 26th May 2021 and to current FCSA members from the 1st October 2021. The latter is to enable our independent assessors to evidence test current members against the newly revised codes.

To view the FCSA’s latest set of Codes for umbrella employers, limited company advisors, and self-employed/CIS providers, please visit: www.fcsa.org.uk

This article is from: