Portfolio 2022 by renarama

P O RT F O L I O 2 0 2 2 Renata Ramazanova

E D UCATI ON

résumé

Bachelor of Architecture, 2019-July 2022 Politecnico di Milano

One year of bachelor course in architecture, 2018-2019 State University of Land use Planning, Moscow W OR KS H OP S

“Critical Infrastructure and digitalisation” 2022, Berlin, Germany Simulating Urban Stormwater Systems and Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) and test various BGI measures to reduce stormwater runoff using SWMM and Python

“Student-tutor” within the festival of young architects, 2021, Ufa,

Russia

In a role of tutor helped a team to develop the project of preservation and renovation of historical street in Ufa

R E N ATA R A M A ZA N O VA

CORTONAOPEN3D, 2020, Cortona, Italy

A 10 days workshop held online, where our team developed a project of the new use of old castles backyard

architecture student graduate in July 2022 Russian citizen living in Milan, Russian citizen ramazanova.renata.v@gmail.com +393515995253

P UB L I CATI ON

“Problems of large cities,” 2019, Moscow Collection of scientific researches and developments of young scientists for the development of agro-industrial complex Document in Russian: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TMHBnLHlWL8m7Qg8SVd-4I1z4hejer2AfRhizPGEg5g/edit?usp=sharing

COM P E TI TI ON

L A N G UAG E S S KI L LS

Redesigning the Carlo Orsini Primary school, 2022, Valenza, Italy The results of the competition have not been yet pu-

English: C1 (IELTS 7.0) Russian: Native Artistic:

Italian: A2

Hand drawing, Graphic, Watercolor, Maquette-making, Leader skills, Strong

Personal:

team work skills Strong team working skills, Research and concept design, learning and adaptation, dedication to work, leadership skills

S OF TWA R E

P E R S ON A L I N E R E STS

Expert:

AutoCAD, Adobe Illustrator, Photoshop, Microsoft office, Twinmotion

Advanced:

ArchiCAD, Revit, Rhinoceros, Grasshopper, Qgis, Adobe Indesign

Basic:

V-Ray, Blender

Hike, literature, travel, ski, swim, watercolor

contents

01.

02. / CON N ECTI N G A M B I E N T ACTI ON S

/ B AC K TO N ATUR E

03. /ALPINE RESIDENCE

/ OLY M P I C V I L L AG E

04.

05. a.8

/ UN D E R STA N D I N G CA’G RA N DA

Sections 1:100

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021 / Architectural Design Studio 2 prof. Mauro Marinelli / prof. Giulia Fava Stefano Banﬁ / Kevin Santus / Gerardo Semprebon

Group n. 6

Neighborhood development, Final Design Studio 2022

p.4

Schoold design, Architectural design Studio 3, 2021

p.9

ISTANBUL - Turkey

MILAN - Italy

Mixed-use design, Architectural design Studio 2, 2020-

p.18

Housing, Building Design Studio, 2020-2021

p.24

Restorer’s research, Heritage Preservation studio, 2021

p.31

MALE, TRENTINO - Italy

MILAN - Itay

Diana Nakhodkina Renata Ramazanova Sofia Rostilova

01.

/ CON N ECT I N G A M B I E N T ACT I ONS 2022 Info: PoliMi, Final Design Studio, 3rd year of Bsc Location: Golden Horn, Istanbul, Turkey Program: Big-scale urban redevelopment project

Professors: Edward Duncan Wall, Antonella Contin, Paolo Scrivano Team: Renata Ramazanova, Diana Nakhodkina, Sofia Rostilova The project area is concentrated in the waterfront, where historically was located one of the most ancient ports of Istanbul - Halicport. I the 19th century the place was abandoned and closed from the public. The approach for the development of the area concentrated on identifying the main problems from a large-scale point of view and further, to identify the smaller-scale solutions that would respond and positively influence the city and area regeneration. The main objective of the project was to deal with the social and physical segregation of the surrounding neighbourhoods, that occurs due to the metropolitan dynamics. The project is focused on creation of the linkage between disconnected areas that surround the project site and the inclusion of the industrial heritage preserved from the port operating times. The research work was an essential part of the project development, since we operate in the city with a rich and complex past. Our historical study was focused on the relationship between large-scale urban regeneration projects and the heritage that was included or excluded from it. Through the case-study analysis we identified the strong and weak approaches use in the neighbourhood of Beyoglu, where our proposed project is located. You can familiarize with the full research paper by scanning the QRcode or clicking on the link

https://issuu.com/renarama/docs/group_2_research_paper

green public spaces. In result, the social segregation is progressing and it causes social inequality that affect the issues of integration of migrants and identity problems of locals.

Through the big-scale analysis we identified that fragmentation of the Istanbul area is derived from the topographical condition of the city and the muscular infrastructure growth that anticipated the diverse character of urban footprint together with lack of green public spaces. In result, the social segregation is progressing and it causes social inequality that affect the issues of integration of migrants and identity problems of locals.

Muscular infrastructure

Context built up area

Secondary access point

Social hub

Main movement

Proposed built up areas

Secondary movement

Green open space

Fences Industrialisation

chaotic expansion not fixable

Luxury real estate

Urban footprint Low quality housing

Sprawl fabric

Social segregation Lack of the public spaces

While the major project concept of connecting ambient plays a role of the basis, the whole project is multi-purpose and attempt to solve not only the disease, but also the causes of it: preserve the identity of the place (industrial heritage, link with surroundings), deal with the flooding problems, connect the green infrastructure (create the green belt with the existing coastal parks) . Main access point

Roads/highways

Traditional urban fabric Industrialisation

Belonging

Public

Mixed

Population boom

Intensification

Topography

set of hills and valleys

Social inequality Private

Geography

Climate change

Rising of the Flooding Overheating sea level

Massive housing production

Poor green network

Government policies

Heritage

The project is in essence an “organised chaos” which is inherent to Istanbul.

Identity

Citizenship / rights

Migration

Story-board of the disease-cause analysis T T T

Major problems Preconditions Subproblems Reasons Processes Connections Process

Residential blocks Offices Commercial Public buildings Heritage

Strategic diagram: connection of surrounding neighbourhoods

Program of the strategy Main access point

Context built up area

Secondary access point

Social hub

Main movement

Proposed built up areas

Secondary movement

Green open space

Main access point

Context built up area

Secondary access point

Social hub

Main movement

Proposed built up areas

Secondary movement

Green open space

The proposed configuration of functions on the site

Master-plan

To link the waterfront and surrounding areas, the project proposes to increase the density slowly towards the waterfront: starting from the 2-3 apartments houses 2 , as typical in the neighbourhood, on the top part and coming to the active and diverse waterfront, where the little port, residential and mixed activities are in place. Following the dense waterfront the sponge parks are placed to create a continuity front the urban fabric, artificial coast and the bay. The five islands are a calm and silent parks, the haven for those who want to take a rest from a dynamic and energetic city. Their main function is to preserve the green belt even during flooding and in the future when the sea level will rise.

Photo-survey of the neighborhood 2

1 2

Low-dense residential zone collage Main entrance zone 3

Axonometry of the proposal

RAINWATER FROM ROOF

STORM WATER PIPE

POROUS PAVEMENT BIO-SWALE

MAX WL

SECTION AA 25

Detailed section with water circulation systems In order to deal with flooding the water-circulation system was implemented with usage of the channel between islands and the waterfront and the water tower in the middle of the site. The water tower not only helps to reuse and supply the rain water, but also preserves the memory of the ancient port, where water towers were very common

Urban section along the main axis of the project

Amphitheatre and of mineral space with natural park

Elevation: view from the sea

Night mode

02 .

/ B ACK TO N AT U R E 2021

Info: PoliMi,Architectural Design studio 3, 3rd year of Bsc Location: Milan, Italy Program: School

Professors: Camillo Magni, Andrea De Matteis Team: Renata Ramazanova, Diana Nakhodkina, Sofia Rostilova The project was created as an exception from the urban rules. In a mineral and story contest we entered a timber building that shorter than other. However, this school is not a part of a strict street front and do work as an exclusion, exposing an innovative building techniques in school, creating a friendly natural environment for kids. Be creating different open-space atmospheres inside the school, we attempt to make the school life entertaining, but at the same time focusing and calm, promoting children to learn more about nature.

Physical model (Concrete+polyplate)

The area contains a large amount of green territory. To use it in the most efficient way we decided to divided it in a different atmospheres. Neighbourhood-opened active area, private school active area and private school calm area inside the school block Axonometry

NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1:200

Elevation 1 - main entrance

ORTH ELEVATION SOUTH SCALE ELEVATION 1:200 SCALE 1:200

SECTION B-B’ SCALE 1:200

Section A-A’ Corridor-Classroom-Garden relations

SECTION A-A’ SCALE 1:200

ORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1:200

Section B-B’Auditorium-Sport Hall relations

OUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1:200

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2021/2022 / Architectural Design Studio 3 prof. Camillo Magni prof. Andrea De Matteis assistant Bogdan Peric

Group 2

Diana Nakhodkina Renata Ramazanova Sofia Rostilova Vasileios Marlantis

SECTION B-B’ SCALE 1:200

One of the goal which we followed, choosing the wood is to create the tactility which gives to children feeling of being home. We kept the structure exposed to exterior to give a curtain rhythm to the facade. The slab and beams are hanging above the perimeter of the building. This allows us to have 2 horizontal offsets of the volume, which refine the structure and could work as horizontal shadowing system. Fro the envelope and slabs of the building CLT panels were applied, as they it has sound, thermal insulation and fire protection. As well as clt is a natural renewable material, it enhance healthy breathing inside the building.

OUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1:200

Elevation 2 - from the backyard

olitecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2021/2022 / Architectural Design Studio 3 of. Camillo Magni of. Andrea De Matteis ssistant Bogdan Peric

SECTION A-A’ SCALE 1:200

11 Group 2

Diana Nakhodkina SECTION B-B’ SCALE 1:200 Renata Ramazanova Sofia Rostilova Vasileios Marlantis

The building is divided in two blocks by function: sport hall and auditorium are opened to the neighbourhood and so located on the western side in the small volume.

The eastern block contains private school functions like classrooms, professors room, library and canteen. Each classroom has a window facing calm gardens. Wide corridors allow the creation of activity spaces along the perimeter of the block

GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1:200 FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1:200

FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1:200

STRUCTURAL GRID FIRST FLOOR SCALE 1:500

Ground floor plan

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2021/2022 / Architectural Design Studio 3 prof. Camillo Magni prof. Andrea De Matteis assistant Bogdan Peric

First floor plan

Group 2

Diana Nakhodkina Renata Ramazanova Sofia Rostilova Vasileios Marlantis

STRUCTURAL GRID FIRST FLOOR SCALE 1:500 Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2021/2022 / Architectural Design Studio 3 prof. Camillo Magni prof. Andrea De Matteis assistant Bogdan Peric

Group 2

Diana Nakhodkina Renata Ramazanova Sofia Rostilova Vasileios Marlantis

STRUCTURAL GRID FIRST FLOOR SCALE 1:500 Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2021/2022 / Architectural Design Studio 3 prof. Camillo Magni prof. Andrea De Matteis assistant Bogdan Peric

Group 2

Diana Nakhodkina Renata Ramazanova Sofia Rostilova Vasileios Marlantis

Typical classroom - maximum flexibility

Classroom arramgments - physical model

Exploded axonometry

Green relations

Classroom elevation

GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1:200

SCALE 1:20

Detailed structure and materials

Structural grid

Cos t va l ue a nd Ma r ke t va l u e e s t imat ion For this project we also calculated the cost and market value in order to check the feasibility of the project and compare with a typical Italian concrete-made school. As a result of the analysis we consider the final market value as 7 404 583 Euro and Cost value as 5 928 161 Euro. Of course, as for the public building this number is unrealistically high, but if we consider the global goal of creating the innovative school, it should be considered that the price will be excessive. All the intangible values of the project should also be taken into account. To see the estimation and the approach for it you can click the link or scan the QR-code

https://issuu.com/renarama/docs/group_6_exam_31.05.2022

Atmosphere through the physical models - concrete

Atmosphere through the physical models - plywood

03 .

/ A L PI N E R E S I DE N C E 2020-2021

Info: PoliMi,Architectural Design studio 2, 2nd year of Bsc Location: Male, Trentino, Italy Program: Mixed-use building

Professors: Mauro Marinelli, Giulia Fava Team: Renata Ramazanova, Diana Nakhodkina, Sofia Rostilova The concept of the project was based on the experience the existing town creates for its inhabitants. Tiny streets between massive volumes, dark tunnels and vast landscapes, massive stone buildings and the fragile wooden. In our project we attempted to recreate all these contrasting experiences. The goal was to create the building that would be modern, but at the same time will fit into the context of traditional alpine houses surrounding it. The BB new building with contemporary facilities can attract city people to move closer to nature. Especially it is relevant in the post-covid era when a lot of people started to work in online-mode and started to appreciate all the benefits that life in the village can give. By doing that, slowly disappearing villages can get the second wind. The project is located in a hamlet in Alpine mountains. It has around 21 residents and a long-lasting history. It makes the context extremely fragile and sensible, but at the same time full of traditional building techniques, that influenced our proposal.

The public areas are placed on the ground floor of the building around the circular courtyard-hall. Garage, kindergarten and the co-working space have separate entrances from the outside. The private apartments of the building complex have their own separate entrances from the courtyard. All of the apartments are

two-story height, with staircases, storages and toilets placed on the ground and middle-ground On the first floor 3 apartments around 140 sqm each are placed. They provide all the benefits country life can give: big terraces, spaciousness, privacy and beautiful outlook.

+0.000

+0.800

Ground floor plan

First floor plan

axonometry

On the façades it was quite challenging to place the windows. Here it follows the logic that bigger windows are placed in the day zones and smaller in the bedrooms and toilets. We wanted to have a grid but at the same time keep the chaos that is present in the buildings around. Also to have a harmony between big openings of balconies and smaller for windows. On sections you can see how is the idea of light going inside the steps of Oculus and the how the stairs connect the entrance and the apartment on the first floor.

Sections

Elevations: front (upper), rare (bottom)

a.8

Sections 1:100

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021 / Architectural Design Studio 2 prof. Mauro Marinelli / prof. Giulia Fava Stefano Banﬁ / Kevin Santus / Gerardo Semprebon

Group n. 6

Diana Nakhodkina Renata Ramazanova Sofia Rostilova

0.048 qs

Thickness [m] qp(PART.INT.)

Plaster Insula�on

0.02 qp(PART.INT.) 0.3

Altezza ne�a interpiano [m] qk 1.74

Facade detail: elevation and section

1.2

Bracers

Weight per area [kN/m2] 20 Plaster 2 Insula�on

2.9 Altezza ne�a interpiano [m] qk 1.74

0.048

8.2

1.2 8.2

Slab Weight Thickness [kN/m2] [m] 0.4 0.02 0.6 0.3

Weight per area [kN/m2]

Slab Weight [kN/m2]

20 2

0.4 0.6

Calculation of the structure

2.9

1.00

CONCRETE STRUCTURE

Beam Analysis Thickness [m]

qp(ﬂoor)

Floor (Parquet) Screed Insula�on Plaster Par��ons

Weight per area [kN/m2]

0.013 10 Floor (Parquet) 0.065 10 Screed 0.025 2 qp(ﬂoor) Insula�on 0.02 20 Plaster Par��ons

Residen�al use

Slab Weight Thickness Weight per area Slab Weight [kN/m2] 2 2 concrete [m] [kN/m ]Cast in-situ[kN/m ] 0.13 0.013qs 10 Bracers 0.13 0.65 0.065 10 0.65 0.05 0.025 2 0.05 0.4 0.02 20 0.4 1.0 1.0 2.23 2.23

2 Residen�al use

qp(PART.INT.)

2 17.005

Plaster

2Insula�on 2

Altezza ne�a interpiano [m] qu 17.005 qk 1.74

Thickness

Weight per area

[m]

[kN/m3]

0.28

0.048

Beam Analysis 5.30 Distance 1 [m] 5.20 Span [m] 6.35 Distance 3 [m] 30.29 Inﬂuence Area [m2] 99.05 Weight per unit lenght q=[kN/m]

Slab Weight Distance 1 [m] 2 Span [m] [kN/m ]

Distance 3 [m] 7 2 Inﬂuence Area [m ] 1.2 Weight per unit lenght q=[kN/m]

8.2

Simply supported beam

Thickness [m]

Weight per area [kN/m2]

0.02 0.3

20 2

Mmax [kN*m] Slab Weight [kN/m2]

334.803

2.9

1.00 fck [N/mm2]

qp(ROOF)

Concrete cover Insula�on Screed Plaster

Weight per area [kN/m2]

0.28 25 Concrete cover 0.2 2 Insula�on 10 qp(ROOF) 0 Screed 0.01 20 Plaster

1. Alluminium pro

Slab Weight Thickness Weight per area Slab Weight Floor (Parquet) [kN/m2] [m] [kN/m2] [kN/m2] Screed 0.5 0.28 25 0.5 qp(ﬂoor) Insula�on 0.4 0.2 2 0.4 Plaster 0 0 10 0 0.2 Par��ons20 0.01 0.2 1.10 1.10

2. Plas Z-sec

3 2

Mmax [kN*m]

334.803

60 34

21 Ec [N/mm2] 210 Es [N/mm2]

Slab Weight 2 r [kN/m ]

10 10 2 20

450 391.3

0.46492 0.39287

21 210 0.46492 0.39287

0.13

Beam 0.65

b[mm] h[mm] Beam 387 360

0.05 0.4 1.0

H [mm] 410

[mm]

L/H b[mm] 12.69 387

h[mm] 360

[

2.23

Residen�al use

3. Tongue and groove board screws

Weight per area 2 [kN/m ]

0.013 0.065 0.025 0.02

Simply supported beam

60 fck [N/mm2] 34 fcd [N/mm2]

Ec [N/mm2] Es [N/mm2]

Thickness [m]

6.35 30.29 99.05

Material Proper�es 450 fyk [N/mm2] 391.3 fyd [N/mm2]

fyd [N/mm2]

Thickness [m]

5.30 5.20

0.4

Material 0.6 Proper�es fyk [N/mm2]

2 fcd [N/mm ]

2 17.005

4. Thermal insula

a.11

Structure

GSEducationalVersion

WINDOW DEATIL 1:10

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021 / Architectural Design Studio 2 di Milano / AU prof. Mauro Marinelli / prof.Politecnico Giulia Fava Stefano Banfi / Kevin Santus / Gerardo Semprebon Gro Ste

Structure

1. Alluminium pro

GSEducationalVersion

Thickness [m]

2. Plas Z-sec 4 3 2

3. Tongue and groove board screws 4. Thermal insula

qp(ROOF)

Concrete cover Insula�on Screed Plaster

0.28 0.2 0 0.01

Weight per area [kN/m2]

Slab Weight [kN/m2]

25 2 10 20

0.5 0.4 0 0.2 1.10

WINDOW DEATIL 1:10

1. Alluminium pro

2. Plas Z-sec 4 3

4 21 3 2 WINDOW DEATIL 1:10

[kN/m ] 7

1. Structural concrete

4. PEX

As the most suitable structure option we decided to use reinforced concrete with combination of load bearing walls and pillars that are following the complex grid since all of are walls are not parallel.

3. Polythene barrier 4. PEX 5. Screed: sand and

4. Thermal insula FLOOR SLAB 1:10

5. Screed: sand cement with and Parquet cement6.with 6. Parquet

a.11

Structure

CONCRETE STRUCTURE

GSEducationalVersion

1. Structural concrete

Slab Weight

2. Floor insula 3. Polythene barrier

3. Tongue and groove board screws

FLOOR SLAB 1:10

1. Structural concrete

4. Thermal insula

STRUCTURAL PLAN 1:200

2. Floor insula

2. Plas Z-sec

3. Tongue and groove board screws

Structural details

DOW DEATIL 1:10

Bracers

2. Floor insula

Thickness

Weight per area

Slab Weight

[m]

[kN/m3]

[kN/m2]

Cast in-situ concrete

0.28

Bracers

0.048

1.2 8.2

3. Polythene barrier 4. PEX

5. Screed: sand and cement with 6. Parquet

1.2 8.2

qp(PART.INT.) Slab Weight 2

Plaster Insula�on

Altezza ne�a interpiano [m]

Thickness [m]

Weight per area [kN/m2]

Slab Weight [kN/m2]

0.02 0.3

20 2

0.4 0.6

2.9

Physical model: clay

04 .

NEAREST BANKS

/ OLY M PIC V I LLAGE 2021

Info: PoliMi, Building design studio, 2nd year of Bsc Location: Milan, Italy Program: Housing (for Athletes/Students)

Professors: Andrea Tartaglia, Giovanni Castaldo Team: Renata Ramazanova, Costanza Franco, Diana Nakhodkina This project was developed within the framework of the forthcoming Olympic games in Milan. The proposal’s main function is to serve as an athlete’s accommodation and to provide all the necessary facilities. After the Olympics this building will be used as a student dormitory. 0m

200m

The main objectiveTRANSPORT of the studio was to focus more on structure and systems SYSTEM ANALYSIS implemented, then on the design. However, we still paid necessary attention to the project design, layouts of the floors and the image of the building in the context.

URBAN ANALYSIS - MASTERPLAN scale 1:500

The main concept was based on the typical courtyard building blocks that are very common in Milan. We decided to break the unite building into 4 independent blocks, each of which would have a different rooms configurations to accommodate different types people. While the rooms and common spaces are located from the first till the fifth floors, the ground floor consists of restaurants, Gym, storages and other neighborhod-open facilities.

0m tram line 24

tram stop

vehicular circulation

bus line 65, 77, 90, 91, 92, NM3

metro stop

pedestrian circulation

metro line M3

bus stop

bycicle circulation

NEAREST BANKS

200m

URBAN ANALYSIS - MASTERPLAN scale 1:500 0m

Master plan

NEAREST BANKS

BUILDING TECHNOLOGY STUDIO

GROUP 04

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021

Costanza Benedetta Franco

prof. Andrea Tartaglia / prof. Giovanni Castaldo

Diana Nakhodkina

Andrea Fossati / Silvia Moretti

Renata Ramazanova

50m

200m

100m

TRANSPORT SYSTEM ANALYSIS

TABLE 01

Transportation analysis TRANSPORT SYSTEM ANALYSIS

200m

0m tram line 24

tram stop

vehicular circulation

bus line 65, 77, 90, 91, 92, NM3

metro stop

pedestrian circulation

metro line M3

bus stop

bycicle circulation

200m

OUND LEVEL scale 1:200

GROUND LEVEL scale 1:200 GROUND LEVEL scale 1:200 REQUIREMENTS GROUND LEVEL

MASTER PLAN INDECES

OT REQUIREMENTS DIMENSION: 8000 sqm PLOT REQUIREMENTS

MASTER PLAN INDECES TOT.MASTER GROSSPLAN FLOOR AREA: 6923 sqm INDECES

OT DIMENSION: 8000 sqm PLOTAREA: DIMENSION: 8000 sqm 20% of filtering surface DABLE 4500 sqm - min.

TOT. GROSS FLOOR AREA: 6923 sqm TOT. GROSS FLOOR sqm surface FOOTPRINT: 1247 sqm AREA: - 72% 6923 of filtering

MASTER PLAN INDECES

Tot. Gross floor area: 6923 sqm

FOOTPRINT: 1247 sqm - 72% of filtering surface UILDABLE AREA: 4500 sqm - min. 20% of filtering surface FOOTPRINT: 1247 sqm - 72% of of the filtering BUILDABLE AREA: 4500 sqm - min. 20% of surface Footprint: 1247 sqm - 72% offiltering filtering surface MAX. HEIGHT: 20.40 m (pitch roof)surface

Max. Height: 20 m (pitch of the roof)

RAL INFORMATIONS

MAX. HEIGHT: 20.40 m (pitch of the roof) MAX. HEIGHT: 20.40 m (pitch of the roof)

NERAL INFORMATIONS PLOT REQUIREMENTS GENERAL INFORMATIONS

N. OF ATHLETS/STUDENTS : 255 (270 if accesible rooms are used as double rooms)

T. N. OF ATHLETS/STUDENTS : 255 (270 if accesible rooms are used as double rooms) TOT. N. OF ATHLETS/STUDENTS : 255 (270 if accesible rooms are used as double rooms)

Plot 102 dimension: 8000 sqm N. OF ROOMS: single rooms - 76 double rooms - 15 accessible rooms

Buildable area:rooms 4500- sqm - min. 20%- 15ofaccessible filtering rooms surface T. N. OF ROOMS: 102 single 76 double rooms TOT. N. OF ROOMS: 102 single rooms - 76 double rooms - 15 accessible rooms

KS LAYOUT (excluding ground floor):

OCKS LAYOUT (excluding ground floor): GENERAL INFORMATIONS BLOCKS LAYOUT (excluding ground floor):

st block: 8 double (apartement) and 3 accessible (apartement) - 5 floors - 1stblock: block:98double and 3 accessible (apartement) - 5 floors 2nd -(apartement) 4athlets/students floors Tot.double N. Of (270 if(apartement) accesible -rooms - 1st block: 8 double (apartement) and :3 255 accessible 5 floorsare used as double rooms) - 2nd block: 9 double - 4 floors 3rd block: 16 single - 3 rooms: floors - 2ndTot. block: 9 Of double - 4 floors N. 102 single rooms 76 double rooms - 15 accessible rooms - 3rd block: 16 single - 3 floors 4th block: single with kitchen 4 floors - 3rd10 block: 16 single 3 floors Blocks layout (excluding ground floor): - 4th block: 10 single with kitchen - 4 floors - 4th block: 10 single with kitchen - 4 floors

- 1st block: 8 double (apartement) and 3 accessible (apartement) - 5 floors - 4 floors - 3rd block: 16 single - 3 floors DENTIAL: rooms, residential facilities SIDENTIAL: rooms, residential facilities RESIDENTIAL: rooms, residential - 4th block: 10 singlefacilities with kitchen - 4 floors

DING’S FUNCTIONS

UILDING’S -FUNCTIONS 2ndFUNCTIONS block: 9 double BUILDING’S

URAL SERVICES: common spacewith withlibrary library ULTURAL SERVICES: commonstudy studyspaces, spaces, coworking coworking space CULTURAL SERVICES: common study spaces, coworking space with library

BUILDING’S FUNCTIONS

EATIONAL SERVICES: commonspaces, spaces,cinema cinemaroom, room, roof terrace CREATIONAL SERVICES:café, café,gym, gym,lounges lounges and and common roof terrace RECREATIONAL SERVICES: café, gym, lounges and common spaces, cinema room, roof terrace

Residential: rooms, residential facilities

UPPORT SERVICES: laundry/ironing areas, bycicle bycicle parking, stock area, security center, garbage disposal rooms, reception PORT SERVICES: laundry/ironing areas, parking, stock area,kitchens, kitchens, security center, garbage disposal rooms, reception Cultural services: common study spaces, coworking with library SUPPORT SERVICES: laundry/ironing areas, bycicle parking, stock area, space kitchens, security center, garbage disposal rooms, reception

Recreational services: café, gym, lounges and common spaces, cinema room, roof terrace laundry/ironing areas, bycicle parking, stock area, kitchens, security center, garbage disposal rooms, reception VIRONMENTAL SECTION(North (North- -South) South) scale scale 1:200 1:200 RONMENTAL SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL SECTION bank (North - South) scale 1:200 Public services:

UBLIC SERVICES: bank ICPUBLIC SERVICES: bank SERVICES: bank Support services:

The ground floor, as the building in general, is divided by 4 blocks, each of which has it’s own entrance. Each pair of blocks shares bike parking, garbage storage and laundry. All public spaces are located in the Northern part facing Viale Isonzo (main circulation artery), while the functions for inhabitants such as coworking and gym are located in the Southern part and can serve as gathering places. The passage, that crosses the building diagonally connects Viale Isonzo with the inner street of the village area.

Urban section

0m BUILDING TECHNOLOGY STUDIO BUILDING TECHNOLOGY STUDIO Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021 Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021 prof. Andrea Tartaglia / prof. Giovanni Castaldo

GROUP 04 GROUP 04 Costanza Benedetta Franco Costanza Benedetta Franco Diana Nakhodkina

20m

Ground floor

20m

TABLE 02 TABLE 02

20m

ELEVATIONS scale 1:100 North elevation NORTH ELEVATION +19.40 m roof

+16.40 m fifth floor

+13.40 fourth floor - roof terrace

+10.40 m third floor

+7.40 m second floor

+4.40 m first floor

±0.00 m ground floor

10m

EAST ELEVATION East elevation +19.40 m roof (pitch +20.40 m)

+16.40 m fifth floor

+13.40 fourth floor - roof terrace

+10.40 m third floor

+7.40 m second floor

+4.40 m first floor

±0.00 m ground floor 0m

BUILDING TECHNOLOGY STUDIO

GROUP 04

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021

Costanza Benedetta Franco

prof. Andrea Tartaglia / prof. Giovanni Castaldo

Diana Nakhodkina

Andrea Fossati / Silvia Moretti

Renata Ramazanova

10m

TABLE 03.10

SECTIONS scale 1:100 +19.40 m roof (pitch +20.40 m)

+16.40 m fifth floor

+13.40 m fourth floor

+10.40 m third floor

+7.40 m second floor

+4.40 m first floor

±0.00 m ground floor

10m

+19.40 m roof

+16.40 m fifth floor

+13.40 m fourth floor

+10.40 m third floor

+7.40 m second floor

+4.40 m first floor

±0.00 m ground floor

-3.40 m underground floor

Axonometric sketch

Sections

BUILDING TECHNOLOGY STUDIO

GROUP 04

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021

Costanza Benedetta Franco

prof. Andrea Tartaglia / prof. Giovanni Castaldo

Diana Nakhodkina

Andrea Fossati / Silvia Moretti

Renata Ramazanova

10m

TABLE 03.9

37.9

SINGLE ROOM WITH KITCHEN

Single room with kitchen

SINGLE ROOM

ROOMS’ SQM INCLUDING THE BATHROOM

DOUBLE ROOM

Double room

Single room

29.3

4.8 4.0

0.9

1.9

0.9

1.3 2.0 1.3

4.1

3.2 63.0

2.0

1.5

SINGLE ROOM - living space 9.37 sqm Regulation: >1/8 Proposal: 2.3 sqm - window+door transparent area Ratio: 2.45/8

SMALL APART Regulation: >1 Proposal: 6.4 Ratio: 3.22/8

1.3

1.0

4.2

SMALL APART Regulation: >1 Proposal: 4.18 Ratio: 2.26/8

DOUBLE ROOM - living space 15.1 sqm Regulation: >1/8 Proposal: 4.3 sqm - 2 windows+2 doors transparent area Ratio: 2.84/8

0.9

SINGLE ROOM WITH KITCHEN - living space 9.62 sqm Regulation: >1/8 Proposal: 237 sqm - window+door transparent area Ratio: 2.47/8

1.3

1.0

RAI VERIFICATION - LIGHTING RATIO (living space excluding the bathroom

52.8

1.3

1.5 5.4

3.2

Small apartment - accesible SMALL APARTMENT - ACCESSIBLE

1.1

4.2

.5 10

4.1

1.9

1.3

4.0

2.1

5.4

SMALL APARTEMENT - ACCE Regulation: +10% per occupa Proposal: 26.4 sqm

DOUBLE ROOM Regulation: 9.5 sqm per occupant Proposal: 19.2 sqm – 9.5 sqm per occupant

2.0

3.1

Renata Ramazanova

SmallAPARTMENT apartment SMALL

1.0

1.3

GROUP 04

SINGLE ROOM Regulation: ≥ 12.5 sqm Proposal: 12.5 sqm

0.9

3.0

SMALL APARTEMENT Regulation: 9.5 sqm per occu Proposal: 22.7 sqm – 11.35 sq 2.9

0.8

0.9

1.9

6.1

Costanza Benedetta Franco

BUILDING TECHNOLOGY STUDIO

0.8

Diana Nakhodkina

0.7

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021

0.7

prof. Andrea Tartaglia / prof. Giovanni Castaldo

0.7

Andrea Fossati / Silvia Moretti

0.7

8.3

SINGLE ROOM WITH KITCHEN Regulation: ≥ 12.5 sqm Proposal: 12.75 sqm

1.2

0.7

PLANS scale 1:100 - typical floor

ROOMS LAYOUTS

4.7

4.4

3.8

Section A-A A-A’single single room room SECTION

Section B-B’ double room SECTION B-B double room

RAI VERIFICATION - VENTILATION RATIO 2.3

SINGLE ROOM WITH KITCHEN - living space 9.62 sqm Regulation: >1/10 Proposal: 2.73 sqm - openable window+glass door Ratio: 2.83/10

0.7 1.3

2.7

2.4

1.5 2.7 2.1

4.5

2.4

5.1

SMALL APART Regulation: >1 Proposal: 5.0 Ratio: 2.72/10 2.5

0.7 0.9

12.6

0.5

26.5

3.9

43.8

1. kitchens 2. common space (cultural and educational servic

3. technical slots

The typical floor i divided into 4 bloc with 4 types of ro

TABLE 03

The blocks are connected with each other trhoug emergency doors

Typical floor plan

SMALL APART Regulation: >1 28 Proposal: 7.5 Ratio: 3.75/10

Legend

SINGLE ROOM - living space 9.37 sqm Regulation: >1/10 Proposal: 2.61 sqm - openable window+glass door Ratio: 2.78/10

0.0

1.2

1.2 0.0

PLAN AND SECTION scale 1:50

2.7

0.2

3.0

0.0

+19.40 m roof (pitch +20.40m)

.5 10

+16.40 m fifth floor

+13.40 m

1.9

2.9

fourth floor

1.2 1.2

+10.40 m

3.0

third floor

8.3

+7.40 m second floor

1.0

3.0

1.1

4.1

+4.40 m first floor

1.9

±0.00 m ground floor

Detailed plan and section BUILDING TECHNOLOGY STUDIO

GROUP 04

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021

Costanza Benedetta Franco

prof. Andrea Tartaglia / prof. Giovanni Castaldo

Diana Nakhodkina

Andrea Fossati / Silvia Moretti

Renata Ramazanova

TABLE 04 GSEducationalVersion

SECTION, ELEVATION AND PLAN scale 1:20

STRUCTURAL DETAILS

The building will be supported by a frame structure made of pillars (30x30cm) and beams in reinforced concrete. The slabs adopted are hollow core slabs (Quad Deck technology) to hollow the integration of systems and to have a lighter structure. The elevators shafts and the stairwells will be en30 closed in a technical compartment in reinforced concrete. BUILDING TECHNOLOGY STUDIO

GROUP 04

Politecnico di Milano / AUIC / 2020/2021

Costanza Benedetta Franco

prof. Andrea Tartaglia / prof. Giovanni Castaldo

Diana Nakhodkina

TABLE 05.1

05.

/ UN D ER STA N DI N G CA’GRAN DA 2021

Info: PoliMi, Historical Building Preservation Studio, 3rd year of Bsc Location: Milan, Italy Program: Heritage analysis

Professors: Alessandra Kluzer, Sara Goidanich Team: Renata Ramazanova, Tamar Tavadze, Mehmet Emin Ege, Ziwen Wei, Ayessa Marie Villamin The work was focused on the analysis and research of the 15th century Hospital, iconic for Milan, that serves right now partially as the university campus and partially as the restorers site. Our task was to evaluate the state of one of the internal façades through the measurement of all the details, mapping of the masonry patterns and all the decays. We’ve estimated the main deterioration patterns and the causes of them. To read the full report, please, scan the QR-code or click on the link

https://issuu.com/renarama/docs/final_report_froup_4_new_

Thank you for considering my application

P O RT FO L I O 2 0 2 2 R e n a t a R a m a z a n o v a32