Evaluation PAHO 2011 (2)

Page 1

Evaluation of the PAHO/WHO Training Workshop on Guideline Development Methods, May 9, 10 2011 Coordination Public Policies and Research Team - Health Systems Based on Primary Health care (HSS)

Objectives The workshop was conducted by Dr. Holger J. Schünemann, Pablo Alonso, Reem Mustafa from the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics at McMaster University and Regina Kulier from the Secretariat of the Guideline Review Committee from WHO. The workshop responds to the findings of the evaluation of PAHO/WHO guidelines (presented at the Managers Meeting in Quito, at the Advisory Committee on Health Research, at the PAHO Meeting on Technical Guidelines in April 2009) as well as to the implementation of the WHO Guideline Review Committee strategy that aims to improve guidelines development.

Summary of commentaries and /questions about guideline development in PAHO: During the sessions, participants and facilitators raised and discussed a number of issues concerning the production of guidelines at PAHO:

-

Establishing guide to documents that are not considered “guidelines” by the GRC handbook 1 such as o

Documents containing standards for manufacturing health technologies such as pharmaceuticals and vaccines;

o

Operational manuals

o

Documents that describe standard operating procedures for organizations or systems

o

Documents that state establishes principles

o

Documents that provide information on different options for interventions without recommending any particular intervention

-

How will PAHO incorporates the Guideline Review Committee recommended processes?

-

How will PAHO develop and implement procedures for guideline development that ensure that guidelines are consistent with internationally accepted best practices?

-

Exploring ways to ensure that PAHO guideline proposals and final manuscripts could be evaluated whether by the WHO Guidelines Review Committee or by a PAHO Guidelines Review Committee.

-

How PAHO will coordinate and provide support to departments producing guidelines

-

Including speaking Spanish, Portuguese and French members as part of the WHO Guidelines Review Committee.

-

Ensuring that all guidelines prepared by PAHO staff comply with the WHO handbook for developing Guidelines

-

Developing and implementing a plan to ensure that the staff developing guidelines in PAHO have appropriate knowledge of the approved methods for guideline development.

1

Monitoring the quality of PAHO guidelines

World Health Organization. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development March 2010.


-

Creating a repository of PAHO guidelines as well as country developed guidelines in the region in the Virtual Health Library.

PAHO is currently updating its publishing policy. The publishing policy is structured into 16 chapters and there are 9 working groups. The Public Policies and Research Team is leading the guideline chapter.

Summary of the training course evaluation Twenty eight participants attended the two-day workshop on "Guideline Development Methods" held in May 9, 10, 2011 at the Washington DC PAHO Headquarters. The purpose of the workshop was to promote the implementation of recommended processes for technical documents and guidelines using scientific research evidence. 20 attendees filled an evaluation form. The results from the evaluation the PAHO/WHO Training Workshop on Guideline Development are presented. Overall, how would you rate this workshop? Only 35% of those attendees that filled the survey had prepared guidelines before attending the workshop. Overall, participants agreed that the objectives of the workshop were met. However, a lower proportion of attendees agreed that there was insufficient time allocated for interactive learning. A more detailed description of the results of the evaluation is reported in box 1: Box 1. Overall, how would you rate this workshop?

Disagree Agree Median.. Range [ ]

The objectives of the workshop were clear.

1

2

[3

4

5]

The content of the workshop met the objectives.

[1

2

3

4

5]

The length of the workshop was appropriate.

[1

2

3

4

5]

There was sufficient time allocated for interactive learning.

[1

2

3

4

5]

The workshop increased my knowledge of how to conduct a Cochrane review.

1

[2

3

4

5]

Usefulness of sessions Overall participants rated the usefulness of each session positively: How useful were the following sessions?

not useful very useful

Overview of guideline development and scoping the guideline

1

2

[3

4

5]

Guideline group: Function and composition Group Process and consensus methods, voting and how to present controversies

1

2

[3

4

5]

Conflict of Interest: What it is, why it is important and how to manage it

1

2

[3

4

5]

Formulating questions and choosing outcomes

1

2

[3

4

5]

Small group work and discussion – question and outcomes formulation

1

2

[3

4

5]

Evidence retrieval and synthesis: Systematic review basics and practicalities

1

[2

3

4

5]

Introduction to assessing the quality of evidence and grading recommendations

1

2

[3

4

5]

An introduction to evidence assessment (see note 1) Using and preparing GRADE tables

1

2

[3

4

5]

Small group work and discussion, then feedback.

1

2

[3

4

5]

Assessing resource use and costs for guidelines

1

2

[3

4

5]


Incorporating values and preferences

1

2

3

[4

5]

Formulating and grading recommendations

1

2

3

[4

5]

Small Group work and discussion: Developing Recommendations

1

2

[3

4

5]

Peer reviewing and publishing your guideline

1

2

[3

4

5]

Take home messages, wrap up

1

2

[3

4

5]

What did you like about this workshop? Response Teachers – top experts in the field The interactive learning Small groups and discussions Capacity building (Knowledge) Methodology of workshop GRADE-pro software

What could be improved about this workshop? Allocate more time for workshop More time for GRADEpro training More clarity on process of creating guidelines More technical support from WHO-PAHO in the countries to strengthen human resources in learning this methodology More clarity on the difference between creating guidelines and recommendations Continuous communications among countries Develop an online training Share more realistic examples in public health

List of participants


Participant

Country

Institution

Gustavo Vargas

Belize

Pan American Health Organization

Susana Hannover

Bolivia

Pan American Health Organization

Roxana Salamanca

Bolivia

Pan American Health Organization

Renato Garcia

Brazil

PAHO/WHO Collaborating center

Laura Ramirez

Ecuador

Pan American Health Organization

Gustavo Bretas

Ecuador

Pan American Health Organization

Guillermo Hegel

Guatemala

Pan American Health Organization

Juanita Rodriguez

Guatemala

Pan American Health Organization

Ana Treasure

Honduras

Pan American Health Organization

Karla Zepeda

Honduras

Pan American Health Organization

Ing Lourdes Ramirez

Honduras

Pan American Health Organization

Marilyn Entwistle

Jamaica

Pan American Health Organization

Roger Emilio Montes Flores

Nicaragua

Pan American Health Organization

Amaia Lopez

Panama

Pan American Health Organization

Giovanni Escalante

Peru

Pan American Health Organization

Eva De Weever

St. Maarten

Ministry of Public Health, Social Development & Labour, St. Maarten

Fleur Hermanides

St. Maarten

Senior Policy Worker. Ministry of Public Health, Social Development & Labour, St. Maarten

Guillermo Troya

Trinidad

Pan American Health Organization

Malhi Cho

USA (WDC)

Pan American Health Organization. Health Technologies for Quality of Care - Health Systems based on Primary Health Care

Dolors Monserrat-Capella

USA (WDC)

Pan American Health Organization. Health Technologies for Quality of Care - Health Systems based on Primary Health Care

Pamela Bravo

USA (WDC)

Pan American Health Organization. Family and Community Health.

Dra Elisa Prieto

USA (WDC)

Pan American Health Organization. Health Surveillance and Disease Prevention and Control

Luis Gabriel Cuervo

USA (WDC)

Pan American Health Organization. Public Policies and Research team Health Systems based on Primary Health Care

Evelina Chapman

USA (WDC)

Pan American Health Organization. Public Policies and Research team Health Systems based on Primary Health Care


Cristina Schneider

USA (WDC)

Pan American Health Organization. Health Surveillance and Disease Prevention and Control

Andrea Gerger

USA (WDC)

Pan American Health Organization. Health Surveillance and Disease Prevention and Control

Andrea Vicari

USA (WDC)

Pan American Health Organization. Family and Community Health

Ludovic Reveiz

USA (WDC)

Pan American Health Organization. Public Policies and Research team Health Systems based on Primary Health Care

Regina Kullier

Switzerland

World Health Organization. Guideline Review Committee Secretariat.

Holger Sch端nemann

Canada

McMaster University. Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics

Pablo Alonso

Canada

McMaster University. Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics

Reem Mustafa

Canada

McMaster University. Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.