Vat 2020 article

S H O U L D VAT B E INCLUDED IN REBUILD COSTS?

INTRODUCTION One of life’s great unanswered questions: Should VAT be included in rebuild costs?

Are we alone in the universe? Who shot JFK? Is time travel possible?

Why do flammable and inflammable mean the same thing? And how come you never see the headline ‘Psychic Wins Lottery’?

These are just some of life’s great unanswered questions, and in the insurance world there is another. That question is: Should VAT be included when calculating the rebuild cost of a property?

It is an important question. After all, the consequences of inaccurate sums insured can be significant for policyholders, brokers and insurers.

Like most unanswered questions, it can also be a complicated one. In fact, the best answer to ‘Should VAT be included when calculating the rebuild cost of a property?’ is… well it depends!

Unfortunately, VAT on rebuild costs is one of those where either “yes you should” or “no you shouldn’t” simply does not apply. It depends entirely on the situation and circumstances.

Within this White Paper we present a short series of examples, which we hope will help you gain some understanding of VAT on rebuild costs...

EXAMPLE ONE Commercial Property Description: A commercial property owned by a business, which is VAT registered and the business uses the entire property to generate taxable income i.e. income subject to one of the three rates of VAT - the standard rate of 20%, the reduced rate of 5% or the zero rate.

The property has a rebuild value of: £1,000,000 excluding VAT and £1,200,000 including VAT Recommendation: If the property is partially or completely destroyed and has to be rebuilt, the property should be insured for £1,000,000 as the business will be able to reclaim the £200,000 VAT on top of the £1,000,000.

In circumstances where a VAT registered business uses, or will use, the property partially to generate taxable income, for example one floor of a 2 storey building, the other storey being rented out without exercising the option to tax (making the rents exempt from VAT, the VAT on the rebuild cost would only be partially recoverable.

In this example, it would probably be fair to claim 50% of the VAT and, therefore, the building should be insured for £1,100,000.

EXAMPLE TWO Commercial Property (Private Capacity Description: A commercial property owned in a private capacity (for example by an individual, director, pension fund or trustee who is not VAT registered. The property has a rebuild value of: £1,000,000 excluding VAT and £1,200,000 including VAT Recommendation: If the property is partially or completely destroyed and has to be rebuilt, the property should be insured for £1,200,000 as the owner will be unable to reclaim the VAT.

EXAMPLE THREE Commercial Property (Landlord Description: A commercial property owned by a ‘landlord’ who is VAT registered and has opted to tax the building, meaning he must add VAT at 20% to the rent.

The property has a rebuild value of: £1,000,000 excluding VAT and £1,200,000 including VAT Recommendation: If the property is partially or completely destroyed and has to be rebuilt, the property should be insured for £1,000,000 as the landlord will be able to reclaim the VAT. Note: Some landlords can still be VAT registered, but may NOT opt to tax the building or buildings they rent out. In such cases, the rents will be exempt from VAT and therefore the VAT on associated costs would not be reclaimable. In this scenario the property should be insured for £1,200,000.

EXAMPLE FOUR Household Property In general, when it comes to residential properties, VAT is not applied to a new build property or to a 100% rebuild of a property, as they are zero-rated.

However, if the property is only partially destroyed, VAT would normally be charged on the rebuild and, therefore, consideration of this needs to be taken into account when deciding how much to insure a property for.

On the basis that no one can predict a full or partial loss of a building, it may be prudent to consider including the VAT element within the building sums in insured.

Additionally, if the residential property has outbuildings, swimming pools, etc., these can also be subject to VAT for rebuilding purposes and, therefore, it is normally recommended to include the VAT element for all outbuildings of this nature.

EXAMPLE FIVE Blocks of Flats If an insured would be able to reclaim the VAT portion of invoices incurred as part of the claim settlement then: • they do not need to include VAT within the sum insured If an insured would be unable to reclaim the VAT portion of invoices incurred as part of the claim settlement then: • they should include VAT within the sum insured to avoid potential under-insurance There are also complexities which mean that even a VAT registered organisation may not be able to reclaim VAT in all circumstances. For example: • Where a VAT registered organisation uses only part of a property to generate taxable income they will only be able to reclaim VAT on the portion that generates taxable income. This means that VAT would be partially recoverable on reinstatement of the building.

• Where a VAT registered property owner opts not to tax rents on a particular property no VAT would be recoverable on reinstatement of that building.

A VAT registered organisation may benefit from certain exemptions, the reduced rate of VAT in certain circumstances, or specific VAT rules may apply to their trade. Only the insured and their accountant or other financial or tax advisor will be able to assess whether this applies and the impact it may have.

Confusion often occurs when considering residential buildings. New build residential buildings and 100% re-build of residential buildings are zero rated for VAT purposes; that is to say that no VAT is charged. However, this requires that reinstatement of the building is considered to be 100% re-build.

Often, foundations remain intact and that could be sufficient for the building not to be considered as 100% re-build for VAT purposes. In addition, VAT does apply to demolition work and professional fees, and outbuildings may be subject to VAT even where the main building is residential.

In reality, the majority of losses that we see are partial losses, where the claim relates to repairs to the building. These partial losses will all attract VAT, even for residential buildings.

In summary, if the insured is unsure whether they would be able to reclaim the VAT portion of invoices incurred as part of a claim settlement then they should seek specialist advice.

Failing that, they should include VAT within the sum insured to ensure they are not underinsured in the event of a loss, especially as VAT will apply to partial losses.

An insured may exclude VAT from the sum insured where they are confident that in the event of a loss of any type / nature they will be able to fully recover all VAT.