Thursday, February 23, 2017 Volume 126, No. 92
NEWS
A holocaust survivor’s story PAGE 4
Clark update not a priority despite University concern Clark has become a topic of concern on campus after Rams for Representation released a video calling for amdinistrative action to renovate the building due to concerns of asbestos as well as campus aestetic. PHOTO BY NATALIE DYER COLLEGIAN
By Stuart Smith @notstuartsmith
After a student group released a video about the state of the Andrew G. Clark building last week, Colorado State University officials have responded with the stance that while CSU recognizes the need for a Clark building update, it is not a priority. The video was released by Rams for Representation, a student advocacy group at CSU, and called on the administration to consider prioritizing an update to the building. The video quickly went viral in the Fort Collins area, and currently has 32,000 views on Facebook. One concern of the student group was the amount of asbestos in the building. Clark does have several instances of asbestos at the moment, according to Shelly
Carroll, the Head of Program Approvals at CSU. According to Carroll, asbestos was removed from the A and B-wings, but it is still present in the C wing. The C-wing has floor tiles that contain asbestos, which have been mostly covered up with carpets, Carroll said. Pipes in mechanical rooms and the plenum areas, or open areas above ceilings and behind walls that contain cables and other appliances, also contain asbestos in the C-wing. Around 50 percent of the ceiling tiles in the C wing contain asbestos, according to research done by Eric March, safety and industrial hygiene manager for CSU. However, Carroll said March assured her that the building is safe as long as the asbestos-containing areas are not disturbed.
Though the student group is calling for a renovation with the claim that the building is in major need of repairs due to its age, Clark went through a series of updates from 2006 until 2010, especially from 2008 to 2010. During that time, major work was done on classrooms in the A and C-wings of Clark. According to a document provided to the Collegian, the project “updated lighting, seating, finishes, acoustics and audiovisual equipment in all eleven A-wing auditoriums and all C-wing general education classrooms.” Also updated were the fire alarm systems in the A and B wings and all three building elevators. The A and B wings were given new ceiling tiles, flooring and paint. In total, those upgrades cost
CSU $6 million with $4 million of that coming from the state, and the other $2 million from the student facility fee. The exterior of Clark was repainted in the summer of 2006, costing the university around $95,000. Despite all of this, there are currently no plans by CSU to renovate Clark. According to Fred Haberecht, assistant director of CSU facilities management, there are several reasons for this. The first reason, Haberecht said, is that Clark is one of a number of what he calls “sixties legacy buildings,” or buildings that were constructed in the 1960’s. According to him, 40 percent of the buildings on campus were built in that era. He also said that CSU has a disproportionately see CLARK on page 4 >>
OPINION
Celebs should get political PAGE 8
SPORTS
Rams capture fourth MW title PAGE 14