A Collection of Undergraduate Projects + Competitions
02
03
04
05
http://archinect.com/rpeer http://lnkd.in/-zZaBm http://www.facebook.com/rpeer
01
Roy Peer, Resume + Portfolio 2013 works from 2011-2013
Education College of Architecture Fall 2009- Spring 2014
University of Arizona Tucson, AZ Bachelors in Architecture College GPA (3.5) Dean’s List 2012, 2011 Academic Year Academic Distinction Leadership Institute Program: AIA National Convention Speaker Mentorship Program 2012-13: Mentor Certified Laser Technician Awards AIA Design Excellence Student Traveling Exhibition: MOCA, several architectural firms, Development Services office, etc. Manuel A. Pombo Scholarship 2012 AIA Design Excellence Fall 2011 Winner: One of eight chosen in whole studio (60) to present design proposal to actual clients Arizona Excellence Award Fall/Spring 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009
Certificate of Achievement International Youth Sketch Design Competition: Shortlist: Summer 2011
Professional Experience
Project Designer 01/2013-present Sustainable City Project Tucson, AZ
Skills Personal Outlook Autodesk: Revit, Auto CAD, 3Ds Max, I believe that architecture Maya, Ecotect Analysis, Map 3D
Revit Instructor 09/2012-present Treehouse Design Group
Adobe: Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Premiere, Audition, Acrobat
Revit Technician + Graphic Presentation Drawings 08/2012-present Treehouse Design Group
Other: Rhino, Grasshopper, Sketch Up, Kerkythea 2008, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, Adforce, Classforce
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Designer 08/2012-present The Daily Wildcat
Miscellaneous AIAS: 2012-2013 Languages: English & Hebrew
Project Designer 05/2012-08/2012 & 05/2011-08/2011 Quality Assurance 05/2010-08/2010 Data Entry for Amoeba Music Project 05/2009-09/2009 Casamba Inc.
References Susannah Dickinson
Tucson, AZ
Los Angeles, CA
Laboratory Manager 08/2010-05/2011 University of Arizona Tucson, AZ
President of Pledge Class 08/2010-01/2011 Beta Theta Pi Tucson, AZ
Studio Professor
srd@email.arizona.edu
should be a reflection of our zeitgeist.
It
should
reflect
today’s status quo in the cultural, social, economic, and political realms.
Our work, our manifestations, should be the artifacts that respond to these realms and seek to solve today’s issues.
Paul Reimer
preimer@email.arizona.edu
Let these issues not be viewed
Cynthia Callahan
as problematic, but as an
cynthiac@email.arizona.edu
Curt Enrich
Treehouse Design Group Principle
curt@treehousedesigngroup.com
(818) 585-5781 royepeer@gmail.com age:21 hometown: LA
Studio Professor
The Daily Wildcat Design Coordinator
RÉSUMÉ
websites: http://archinect.com/rpeer
opportunity for progress and
http://lnkd.in/-zZaBm
innovation.
http://www.facebook.com/rpeer
ROY E PEER
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
02
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
03
2009-present
Years of Creative Events
A Collection of Undergraduate Projects + Competitions Roy E Peer cell: (818) 585-5781 email: royepeer@gmail.com http://archinect.com/rpeer http://lnkd.in/-zZaBm http://www.facebook.com/rpeer ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
04
01 ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
05
INFORMATION + COLLABORATION CENTER ARC 401 2012
02
AECOM URBAN SOS SUMMER 2012
03
DOWNTOWN MARKET PLACE ARC 302 2012
04
THE WAITING ROOM ARC 302 2012
05
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALISTS CAMPUS ARC 301 2011
Site: Tucson, AZ
Site: Manhattan, NY
Site: Tucson, AZ
Site: Catalina Foothills, AZ
Site: Tucson, AZ
Program: Library
Program: City Bridge
Program: Mix Use
Program: Viewport
Program: Sanctuary
Scale: L
Scale: XL
Scale: L
Scale: S
Scale: M
[STARTS ON PAGE 06]
[STARTS ON PAGE 14]
[STARTS ON PAGE 018]
[STARTS ON PAGE 22]
[STARTS ON PAGE 24]
01
INFORMATION + COLLABORATION CENTER ARC 401 2012
With the site located in Tucson, AZ. This information + collaboration center lies in a campus full of a variety + culture. Tucson's is not as mixed + it's climate features harsh rays all year long.
When thinking of the mixture of ideas, talents, + thought I studied the insect, who in the need to collect pollen, cross pollinates the flowers it visits.
The symbolic relationship between pollinator + pollen benefits both parties. In search of creating cross pollination in architecture, I studied the "chance like" city Rem describes in Delirious New York, + Tschumis's cross pollination principles. ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
From these precedents the program
PAGE
06
begins to intersect, collect, + even avoid each other in hopes of creating not an organized program but spontaneous events.
This is human entomophily.
2013
ELLER
Undergraduates:
5,476
Public Stair 300X4=1,200 Public Rest rooms 300X2X4=2,400 Cafe Deliveries 200 General Loading Area 200 1 1 200 Mechanical 2,000 1 4 8,000 Janitorial Storage 500 1 4 2,000 Elevators 100 2 4 800 Exit Stairs 300 2 4 2,400 17,200
0101010010001111010110 1010100100011110101101 0101001000111101011010 1010010001111010110101 0100100011110101101010 1001000111101011010101 0010001111010110101010 0100011110101101010100 1000111101011010101001 0001111010110101010010 0011110101101010100100
is a form of pollination whereby pollen or spores are distributed by insects. ENTOMOPHILY IN NATURE
Graduate:
Large Work Room 400 Medium Work Room 250 Large Study Room (8-10) 200X11=2,200 Small Study Room (4-5) 75X16=1,200 Conference Room 200X2=400 Visiting Faculty Office 100X8=800 Audio Visual Lab 100X2=200 Music Rehearsal Room 100X4=400
service
Entomophily:
collaboration
POLLINATORS
POLLEN/INFORMATION
90,193
117
Total:
549
OTHER VEHICULAR
609
Total:
2,875
SOCIAL COMMUNITIES
COMPUTER ENGINEERS
609
URBAN SPACE
HUMAN ENTOMOPHILY (A CROSS POLLINATION OF DISCIPLINES)
awareness
CENTRAL HUB
STUDENT UNION
Total:
Graduate:
2,875
CALA
663
Undergraduates:
432
Total:
Daily Visitors:
Graduate:
117
6,139
SITE
Total:
549
ARTS
18,800
FUNCTIONALITY ARCHITECTURE
ART UNION GOERS
2,266
Graduate:
5,476
public
visibility
FORCE INTEREST
BICYCLISTS
Engineering
Undergraduates:
Undergraduates:
Gallery 1,500 Gallery Private Collections 4,000 Auditorium 6,000 1 Library Collections 7,000 1 Community Meeting Room 300
exterior 5,000 public
Lobby + Reception 3,000 Café 500 Library Reference 1,500
events in space
CALA
2,266
Graduate:
3,560
ELLER
Open Study Area 9,000 1 Study Carrels 70X60=4,200
13,200
432
Graduate:
Engineering Undergraduates:
22,000
Breakout 120 Coffee 200 IT 220 Storage 120 Servers 900 Administration Offices 2,000
admin
82,693
sf TOTAL w EXTERIOR
CALA
Undergraduates:
SITE
Daily Visitors:
BGSF TOTAL based on 30% Multiplier
7,500
6,139
352
Total:
1,946
63,610
ext.
Total:
1,594
Graduate:
STUDENT UNION
5,850
NASF TOTAL Outdoor Café 1,500 Exterior Terrace 6,000
663
ARTS
Undergraduates:
collaboration
22,000
Undergraduates:
1,594
Graduate:
352
Total:
1,946
COLLABORATION CENTER + SITE FORCES
points
lines
planes
solids
changes in sensory experience:
movement and path:
space definers:
program:
entrance
stairs
opaque walls
library
exits
hallways
translucent walls
art gallery
thresholds
walkways
ceilings
auditorium
interactions
elevators
floors
reception
events
areas of rotation
negative space by-product
study rooms
moments
areas for movement
material
bathrooms
points help dictate changes in space
lines are the movement between dif-
Before solids come planes, and ulti-
solids, or pieces of program, can be
along paths or changes in sensory
ferent experiences.
mately
the
negative
designed in the same fashion as lines
solids
and
adjacent
intake. if the user experiences a
space
between
spatially
to
threshold this is considered a point.
when designing with lines and points
if a user is exposed to a new smell
we deconstruct common notions about
or change in air pressure, this is
circulation and begin to integrate it
What
considered a point. Whether or not
more closely to the program.
building and the surrounding site?
people
naturally
travel
between
point. hence the saying, “from point in
experience
there
movement of the user, or of the surroundings perceived.
spaces
between
your
tion you will find a space that defines its overall composition.
building exposed, hidden, or focused?
interesting events occur when whole
tunities and events that can result
Planes can be made of any material
pieces of program begin to build
from line and point design.
but
relationships.
the
importance
is
the
formal
space it creates. library [target] point b
when the standard line is modified the user can be exposed to different points along the path. this gives the architect more control, and allows the user to experience new events in space.
PAGE
With planes one can manipulate the experience by concentrating on how the spaces and points are created
study
gallery
through the movement of lines around
[origin] point a
07
the
must
almost always be movement whether the
PORTFOLIO
within ever line and point configuraare
diagrammed below are different oppor-
a to point b.” but for there to be a change
and points.
points and lines.
What is seen, is it a treat or is your
the change was consciously observed.
ROY PEER
N
space.
[target] point b
user b
library
systems/circulation
study
y
ext. auditorium
information
auditorium
admin
collaboration
er
systems/circulation plan parti
section parti
study parking
program diagram
gallery library
ll
cross of paths: event created
user a
ga
when the paths cross between two different used the opprotunity for an event, or meeting, or change in awareness of the other can occur.
[origin] point a
cafe
gallery
library
study
lobby
parking
parking
N
Interior View of Library, Art Gallery, Study Carrels
A
20
19
A
11
10
B
B
3 15
2
8
15
A
6
15
2
9
5
B
modular components
module in plan
15
1 3
legend 1
lobby
2
study carrel
3
gallery
4 5 6 15
7
15
16
10
19
17
LEVEL 2
18
SCALE 1/16”=1’0”
NORTH:
level 1-2 stair
level 1-2 stair
19
5
auditorium insulation
library libary reference meeting room
8
s study room
9
m study room
10
l study room
11
conference
12
admin
14
exterior steel
15
mullion
16
4
13
servers
15 14
it
15
stair
16
elevator
17
loading area
20
module assembly
15
19
19
19
18
mechanical
19
bathroom
20
storage
21
cafe seating
20
18 2
15
SCALE 1/16”=1’0”
LEVEL 4
19
NORTH:
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
modules in elevation
level 5
level 4
15
6
15
1
cafe 5 2
8
gallery
gallery
15
15
16
rendering view point
library 16
exterior auditorium 19
13 12
18 14
LEVEL 1
point + line principles applied
SCALE 1/16”=1’0”
higher speed circulation
15
15
SCALE 1/16”=1’0”
NORTH:
cross programming principles applied 15
15
LEVEL 3
NORTH:
15
ROY PEER
15
19
19
19
PORTFOLIO
modules in response to site
20
19
PAGE
08
21
15
15
19
15
19
19
7
19
15
15
6
5
6
6
21
4
1
5
5
2
3
15
4
9 1
2
2
2
5
8
15
8
21
8
3
4
16
2 15 16
1
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
10 20
1 lobby 19
19
13
13
14
14
2 study carrel
19
3 study room 12
4 library
12
5 art gallery 6 cafe
ON PARKING 1 18RAMP ONLY 18
18
7 exterior auditiorium
N
8 auditiorium LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1
S-N SECTION
SCALESCALE 1/16”=1’0” 1/16”=1’0”
SCALE 1/16”=1’0”
15
15
NORTH: NORTH:
NORTH:
LEVEL LEVEL 3 LEVEL 3 -1/2
SCALE 1/16”=1’0” SCALE SCALE 1/16”=1’0” 1/16”=1’0”
NORTH: NORTH: NORTH:
LEVEL 5
SCALE 1/16”=1’0”
9 admin NORTH: 10 parking
PERSPECTIVE LOOKING SOUTH
15
Skin System
15
20
20
Exterior View
7
8
5
6
5
4
9
4
3
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
09
2 1
10
1 lobby 2 study carrel 3 study room 4 library 5 art gallery 6 cafe 7 exterior auditiorium 8 auditiorium 9 admin 10 parking
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
10
Circulation space leading to the library. Note, the systems are visible below ones feet, allowing one to learn and visually see how and where they lead. Low opacity is vital in creating awareness. When you see the pieces of program and the activity that happens within them, curiosity is bound to emerge.
ROOF SYSTEM/MODULE
glazing
solar panels
solar panels
N
glazing
floor structure
structure structure
water proofing water proofing
floor glazing
cable track
hot/cold water supply
hvac
concrete
steel panels insulation
structural glass
truss mullion
supply fans
ROY PEER
cable track
PORTFOLIO
PAGE
11
hot/cold water supply
floor glazing
floor structure
concrete
Exploded Bay
FIRST FLOOR STAIR LOOKING NORTH
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
12
1/16” Structural Model
1/4” Section Model
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
13
1/16� Model with Site
Site Model Completed by members of Brad Lang Studio Fall 2012
02
AECOM URBAN SOS COMPETITION SUMMER 2012
Let's cross a frontier; one that has been unsuccessfully attempted, and not widely applied. Bridge cities. Living on a bridge brings great value to many fields related and adjacent to architecture. Architecturally living over a river is a first pass to a new kind of excitement. From a developer's point of view, you have the height of a high-rise, and you are exposed to the water. But how come this idea has not been exploited all over the globe? The biggest issue with this scale is the lack of urban outdoor green space. And after analyzing the past, it can help better design the future. The answer to creating a better city ROY PEER
bridge is the combination of commercial,
PORTFOLIO
PAGE
14
residential, and urban space all within a functional infrastructure. Instead of creating more conventional bridges, we can use the structure of the bridge to facilitate a city. In a city that already so dense, the transition from bridge to city can be seamless, bringing the rest of NYC and the NJ area closer.
2013
Site
Precedent
The Ponte Vecchio
Where: Florence, Italy When: 996-1345 Who: Taddeo Gaddi
Many of the precedents that have been executed lack a great urban space. The Pointe Vecchio in Florence creates a great
London Bridge
human condition along the bridge. Some may even forget they are traveling
Where: London, England When: 1176-1209
across a bridge due to the markets and street life that exists on the bridge. But the scale is not appropriate for span of the Hudson. The Skyscraper Bridge by
Chateau Chenonceau
Raymond Hood was never brought to fruition. The
Where: Loire Valley, France When: 1515-1521 Who: Thomas Bohier
biggest issue with this scale is the lack of urban outdoor green space. After analyzing the past, it can help better design the future.
Pulteney Bridge
Where: Bath, England When: 1773
The site lies over the Hudson River between Upper West Side Manhattan, NY, and North Bergen, NJ. These cites both have existing parks and have a relationship that, although
Skyscraper Bridges
physically divided by the Hudson, is extremely strong, not only with view but with hu-
Who: Raymond Hood
man activity. Everyday millions of people travel to Manhattan for work and pleasure. Many different types of transportation are currently being used, such as ferries, subways, trains, automobile, buses, and certain types of aircraft.
Bridge of Houses
A connection between these two cities will break the frontier that the Hudson has
Where: New York City When: 1981 Who: Steven Holl
physically created and bring the communities closer together. Images: The Bay Line Case Study Submission #: P1140 http://sf.streetsblog.org/wp-content/upload1/TheBayLineWPA2.O.PDF
Concept
Program Instead of creating more
1
conventional bridges, we can use the structure of the bridge to facilitate a city. In a city that is already so dense, the transition from bridge to city can be
2
seamless, bringing the rest of NYC and the NJ area closer. 3
4
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
15
5
6
7
New York City is one of the most expensive dollars/sqft2 areas in the United States. Everyday millions of people travel through and to the Manhattan area. And as we escalate up from the street level the price of real estate increases. The same can be said as we get closer to the waterfront. Theoretically the highest floor on the waterfront holds the most value.
$$ $$$$ $ $$$ $ $ $$ $ $
Why build only on the available land? Why not build on the water? Why not connect the millions of people who travel from and to Manhattan and create a beautiful place to live. The proposal is briefly explored, and the numbers are staggering. Let’s create a new urban area, while bringing the Manhattan area, and the burros and states around it closer. Bridge cities in the past have created an inhabitable connection of two different areas of interest. Let’s take a look at how it has been done before.
$ $$ $$ $ $$ $$ Existing Building Conditions
Dollar/Square Foot
$$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$ $$
Building Diagram for most desired real estate
$ $$ $$ $ $$$$
What if you building on the water?
LEGEND 1
Urban Park
2
Residential Units
3
Commercial/Civil Units
4
Bridge Highway
5
Bridge Structure
6
Elevators to/from Beaches
7
Public Beaches
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
16
Residential Units & Park
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
17
Beach Landing
03
DOWNTOWN MARKET PLACE ARC 302 2012
The third year studio was asked to design a mixed use market place with a site that existed on the border of a dense downtown, and a quiet neighborhood. The initial response was in hope of creating balance, and creating a place where the synergy of the two opposite neighborhoods could merge in harmony.
From Broadway
The north, downtown edge, featured heavy traffic (public transportation, automobiles, bicycles, and pedestrians) in which the design proposed a public orchard. If one was to walk from this public orchard which functioned as a park as well, they would progressively make their way into the market, or the center of the sites differences. Once continuing past the market one would find themselves in a green scape that encourages community based activities (soccer fields, storytelling areas, and places of private relaxation.
Lower Market
When one travels vertically you pass the more public areas on the ground floor and make your way to the private dwellings above; arranged in response to the solar conditions of the harsh Tucson sun.
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
18
The market itself served two primary purposes; a day-to-day interior market and a weekly exterior farmers market in which the neighborhood could engage in. To achieve a more synthesized relationship between the permanent market spaces and the weekly farmers the faรงade of the markets were operable. When raised there was no longer a distinction between interior or exterior, or, permanent or temporary. The marketplace could be one.
2nd Floor Cafe
Site Plan
2013
7 6
6
1
3
1
1
3
4
8
1
4
5 6
7
6
1
Market
2 Cafe 3 Condo 4 Suite
6
5 Bike Parking 6 Parking 7 Greenscape 8 Offices
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
19
Public Park
Neighborhood Greenscape
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
20
Outdoor Market Area
Shaded Public Space
Circulation to 2nd Floor
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
21
Residential Units
04
THE WAITING ROOM ARC 302 2012
The city of Tucson lies in a vast valley surrounded by beautiful mountains. Naturally the city's fabric is constructed within the valley but begins to fade away as the topography becomes less forgiving. Only the wealthy live in the private homes, although even those diminish after one enters the mountain's canyon. The Waiting Room, a small-scale rest space amongst the mountain trail is designed to create awareness. Siting on the edge of the mountain it waits to be understood. The chosen site reveals three different types of human inhabitance, almost a gradient change from human to natural habitat. The waiting room consists of a central room with three openings. The central room shares no relationship ROY PEER
with the sun or views, leaving the
PORTFOLIO
PAGE
22
inhabitant disoriented. Only through double shelled roofing and angles walls can light enter. Each opening points the user to a different condition of the city: the valley, the mountain side, the canyon. Will the waiting room ever create awareness by a passing hiker? Will this inspire thoughts of our inhabit-
“Building transcends physical and functional requirements by fusing with a place, by gathering the meaning of a situation. Architecture does not so much intrude on a landscape as it serves to explain it.� (Steven Holl, Anchoring)
ance in cities? Should we live in a manmade valley or amongst dense nature and can a room help to explain this?
2013
LOCATION ON TRAIL
SITE PHOTOS
SITE PANORAMA
ENTRANCE/EXIT
CANYON/CITY/MOUNTAIN
Visual views through room exits.
REARRANGED
HUMAN INHABITANT GRADIENT
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
23
ROOM DISORIENTATION
A panorama that places the room’s location into perspective.
The user centered within the waiting room. Visual allowance is represented through shading opacity.
05
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALISTS CAMPUS ARC 301 2011
The Unitarian Universalists have an unique goal within their religious endeavours. They are open to all kinds of religious practice. In an architectural sense the response must accommodate all types of religious rituals. The campus called for a sanctuary, a chapel, a school, an administration office, and a social gathering place. When designing the sanctuary the objective was not set a hierarchy between religions but to break all hierarchy in order to respect all UU goes. The floor plan is made of alternating slabs, all at different heights but easily walkable, just like any stair. Each block left room for a number of activities including: preachable area, choir space, praying plinths, processions, audience seating, etc. This allowed the space to never be defined by form, but defined by its inhabitants. The rest of the campus held close to a system of roof structure. One for the land, which was designed to allow the earth to cover the program below. One for humans, which allowed teachers to have a bird's eye view of the students playing below, or turning a outdoor space into an outdoor auditorium. The last is for spiritual experience, designed in such a way that when the south sun struck its reflective metal it would bounce onto a opaque lightly colored panel which was offset to allow ambient light to enter the spaces, instead of the harsh direct rays of the sun. Through these systems the campus seeks to acknowledge the user and land we intrude on.
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
24
The path leading to the UU sanctuary entrance.
2013
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST
TAKEN GIVEN TAKEN GIVEN TAKEN GIVEN GIVEN
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
25
TAKEN
CAMPUS CONCEPT
GIVEN
The site features programs such as a multifunctional parking lot, a school, administration building, social hall, exterior coffee room, a chapel, and the sanctuary. Hierarchically the sanctuary holds the most value to the clients; respecting this the other pieces of program are assembled to reveal and hide the sanctuary [or treat.] Before one makes their way to the sanctuary they must pass through the other pieces of program. Each space before controls the visibility of the treat, some whose relationship focuses and others whose deny view according to program necessity. Subsequently each “given� moment reveals different levels or details and perspective of the sanctuary. Essentially this began as an investigation of the use of planes and controlling user experience and later developed into the forms shown in the animation frames above.
Exterior Block Space
Storage WC
Conditional Block Space
Coffee Area Exterior Sitting
Kitchen
Chapel
Exterior Sitting
WC Coffee Area
Exterior Sitting
Kitchen
Exterior Sitting
WC Activity Area
Exterior Sitting
Kitchen
Exterior Sitting
WC
Play Area Sandbox
Teachers Lounge
Confrence
Classroom
Offices
Information Center & Waiting Area
Classroom Classroom
Classroom
Parking Lot / Market Area / Wedding Space
Parking Lot / Market Area / Wedding Space
ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
26
This section perspective displays the activity around and within the different building systems. The interior serves the many rituals of the UU, the stair roof serves as an auditorium for the arts and lectures, and the double skin system (to the left) creates an area to admire the nature that surrounds the site.
Building Systems
To Distort Hierarchy The module varies in height giving the floor plan a distorted hierarchy. Due to the multiple religions with different rituals the floor plan serves all religions by not serving one specifically. ROY PEER PORTFOLIO
PAGE
27
The space between the floor slab and the seated area houses the mechanical systems and lighting, creating the affect of lightness in the space.
To Control Light This double skin system filters the harsh sun and allows a minimal amount of light to enter the space. Light is important in most religious spaces, and the skin aims to create moments where light can penetrate through, and others where the light hold ambient qualities. The reflectivity of the concrete and the mirror (which exists on the other side) reflects whatever light that isn’t absorbed by the concrete to enter the space in an ambient fashion.
Light Studies Module Detailed Section
To Accommodate Us This system has bifunctional attributes as a roof and as auditorium seating. The risers of the steps function as a series of windows and allows another opportunity for ambient light to enter the space. The variance of three different stair sets allows for the void spaces that they create to change the openness of the space below.
Light Studies
Roy Peer, Resume + Portfolio
2013