....
ill
i
VOLUME 1
AUGUST
1983
NO. 1
i
Editor's Note: The recent move to allow a relatively larger depreciation of the peso has sparked a lot of discussions on the state of the Philippine economy, Hence, our first issue is devoted to a discussion of research findings and recommendations on development finance, Contributions for the next issues of Development Research News are welcome, provided they are submitted typewritten and double-spaced on or before the 15th of every month, ........... EXCHANGE RATI'5 H.EXIBILITY AND INTERVENTION POLICY IN THE PHILIPPINES, 1973-1981
Prior to 1970, under the fixed exchange rate regime, there was a great tendency to consider the exchange rate as an objective rather than as an instrument of policy in the Philippines. Maintaining the existing exchange rate was a matter of national pride and prestige, and changing the rate, or even the prospect of doing so, was considered a critical political issue. Consequently, when the country went through a period of growing external imbalances in the 1950s and 1960s, the inevitable but delayed devaluation that ensued was such that the adjustment process became very costly and painful.
more
Project No. 83-01 hy Dr. Filologo Pante Jr.,
grow and became embedded in the economic system, adjustment's would have been far less disruptive.
President, BIDS A research study on exchange rate flexibility and intervention policy in the Philippines in the post-1970 period was conducted by Dr. Filologo Pante Jr., president of the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS). The study discusses in general the implications of exchange rate flexibility in less developed countries and in particular the exchange experience of the Philippines during the period of generalized floating of major currencies from 1973 to 1981.
Since 1970, the Philippines has adopted a flexible exchange rate system. This system, however, is characterized more by a limited rather than full flexibility and the domestic currency can be more appropriately described as "crawling" rather than floating vis-a-vis the U S dollar. This, the author says, is not unexpected in a developing country like the Philippines where certain structural characteristics preclude free floating as a feasible alternative. (Continued next page)
Had changes in the exchange rate been undertaken promptly, before relative price distortions could
MONETARY INDICATORS 1975-1982 (In million pesos) Item I. Total domestic liquidity A. Money supply B. Savings and time deposits C. Domestic substitutes I1. Domestic credits outstanding A. By end-user i. Public sector ii. Private sector B. By institutional i. Monetary
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
28,886 10, 315 8, 939 9,632
35,897 12,075 12,950 10,872
43,931 14,938 17,593 11,400
51,837 16,945 23,398 11,494
57,360 18,844 26,565 11,951
35,258
43,678
51,464
63,075
5,499 29,759
8,775 34,903
10,846 40,618
3,555
5,557
31,703
38,121
1_980
1981
1982
67,803 22,538 32,894 12,371
82,091 23,524 42,115 16,452
95,298 23,524 55,208 16,566
79,475
95,128
115,766
141,303
11,649 51,426
12,286 67,189
14,572 80,556
18,303 97,463
28,11.5 113,188
6,295
7,105
8,761
9;904
15,362
19,785
45,169
55,970
70,714
85,224
100,404
121,518
source
authorities
ii. Deposit monty banks
Source: Central Bank of the Philippines, The Philippine Economy, Policies and Developments 1975-1982.