On a Smarandache Partial Perfect Additive Sequence
Beary Ibstedt Abstract: The sequence defined through a2t+l=a~wl, a2t+2~I+I for ~l with al=a2=1 is studied in detail. It is proved that the sequence is neither convergent nor periodic - questions which have recently been posed. It is shown that the sequence has an amusing oscillating behavior and that there are terms that approach ± co for a certain type of large indices.
Definition of Smarandache perfect ; sequence: If; is a p-ary relation on{ ah a2. a3 • .... } and ;(3i, 3i+t, 3i+2, ... 3i+p-I)= ;(8;. 8;+1, 8;+2, .... 8;+p-I) for all 3i. 8; and all p> 1. then {3n} is called a Smarandache perfect; sequence. If the defining relation is not satisfied for all 3i.8; or all p then {3n} may qualifY as a Smarandache partial perfect; sequence. The purpose of this note is to answer some questions posed in an article in the Smarandache Notions Journal, vol 11 [1] on a particular Smarandache partial perfect sequence defined in the following way: al=a2=1 a2k+l=lik+I-l, ~1
(1) (2)
a2k+2=~+1+1, ~l
Adding both sides of the defining equations results in a2k+2+a2k+I=2a.:+1 which gives
(3) Let n be of the form n=k·2 1e·2'"
m •
The summation formula now takes the form
Ie m
La; =2 La; i=1
(4)
;
4
From this we note the special cases
La i=1
8
i
=
2m
4 ,L a i = 8, .... La; i=l
=2m •
i=1
The author of the article under reference poses the questions: "Can you, readers, find a general expression of3n (as a function ofn)? Is the sequence periodical, or convergent or bounded?" The first 25 terms of this sequence are k ak
1 1
1 The
2 1
3 0
4 5 6 2 -1 1
7 1
1 :
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 -2 0 0 2 0 2 2 4 -3 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 3-1
sequence as quoted in the article under reference is erroneous as from the thirteenth tenn.
103