Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
Maastricht UAC Safety Management Work Programme 2010
Version 1.1
Page 1 of 26
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
CONTENTS 1. Mission, values and guiding principles .......................................................3 2. Introduction.....................................................................................................4 3. Major Deliverables Schedule.........................................................................5 4. SMWP 2010 Part 1 - Routine Activities........................................................6 5. SMWP 2010 Part 2 - Exceptional Activities...............................................13 5. APPROVAL, CHANGE RECORD AND PROGRESS COLOUR KEY.........21 Annex 1 – Resource Estimate........................................................................23 Annex 2 - Divisional Safety Staff....................................................................26
Version 1.1
Page 2 of 26
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
1.
MISSION, VALUES AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES The mission of the Maastricht UAC Safety Management Team is to improve safety levels, to decrease the risk of an aircraft accident, whilst accommodating traffic growth. This mission is supported by safety management through the following key principles: •
To monitor and improve our overall safety performance;
•
To ensure that any safety risks arising from changes to the ATM Functional System are acceptably mitigated;
•
To foster a positive safety culture across all Divisions;
•
To establish good relations with our adjacent ANSP’s, Safety partners and Safety Regulatory and Supervisory Authorities.
Safety Management Team Values
Version 1.1
•
Integrity;
•
Teamwork;
•
Independence;
•
Competence;
•
Customer Focus;
•
Objectivity.
Page 3 of 26
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
2.
INTRODUCTION The Safety Management Work Programme (SMWP) defines the required activities for the conduct of Safety Management at the Maastricht UAC including the definition of the work packages; objectives; planned deliverables; and derived benefits. The purpose of this document is to provide a consolidated plan of the safety activities that will be conducted during 2010 in order to achieve the MUAC business plan objectives. In addition to the ongoing tasks required to keep the Safety Management System running and ensure it is effective [Ref Work packages, 1, 2 and 4], several key strategic safety benefits are anticipated in 2010: 1.
Introduction of human factors methods into the SMS, which includes the introduction of the safety survey methodology in to the Operations room, and introduction of HF methods with in projects and changes [Ref Work packages 1 and 5] ;
2.
Improvements to the overall safety culture [Ref Work package 6];
3.
Refinements to the safety assessment methods and how these are organised, to realise both effectiveness and efficiency improvements [Ref Work packages 1, 3 and 5];
4.
Continued cooperation, preparation and integration of safety management to realise synergies with our FABEC partners [Ref Work package 7].
This SMWP for 2010 has been assembled based on the residual activities of the 2009 SMWP, input from the Safety Coordination Group (SCG) and from the Heads of Divisions. The plan is split into 2 distinct parts. Part 1 describes the ongoing routine safety activities that must be performed in order to monitor and improve the Centre’s safety performance. Part 2 of the plan describes those exceptional activities which are specifically triggered to occur during 2010. These activities are required either to enhance a particular part of the SMS, or to perform some status checks which have been requested. The plan contains seven work packages which are further broken down into supporting activities. The schedule of key deliverables is contained in Section 3 and the Work Packages are described in Sections 4 and 5. Annex 2 contains a list of Divisional Safety Experts. An estimate of the resources required to support the identified activities is provided in Annex 1. Progress against this plan will be monitored by the Safety Management Committee (SMC).
Version 1.1
Page 4 of 26
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
3.
MAJOR DELIVERABLES SCHEDULE
Version 1.1
Page 5 of 26
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
4.
SMWP 2010 PART 1 - ROUTINE ACTIVITIES
WP 1. Sustain the Safety Management System Procedures ongoing to: measure and improve the overall safety performance of the Centre; to ensure the processes are both effective and efficient; and to reflect all applicable regulations and best practices.
OBJECTIVES
PLANNED DELIVERABLES
Updated SMM
Proactively monitor safety performance to detect issues before they have an operational or technical safety impact;
Periodic Safety Performance Reports
Incident Investigation Reports
Report, assess and investigate separation infringements and technical problems, and implement recommendations;
Technical Problem Reports
Updated ESARR Compliance Matrix
Continuously monitor and improve the effectiveness of the Safety Management System.
Completed Changed Regulation Action Plans
Minimise risks of an aircraft accident or incident by;
Maastricht UAC Implementation Activities
Activity Manager
REQUIREMENTS
Internal Support
External Support
- Update safety monitoring processes to incorporate newly published EUROCONTROL safety KPIs;
T. Braspennincx
- Incorporate EUROSS (when established) in to SMS
T. Braspennincx
K Fricke-Ernst
- Finalise SAP predefined changes process & fine tune Ops change process
T. Braspennincx
Ops Change mgmt
- Revise interface procedure to include notification of Type B changes
T. Braspennincx
F Greven
K Cartmale
Safety Experts
T. Braspennincx
B Whitfield
- Update Safety Organisation Procedure - Update Plan Procedure, inc addition of reusable GSN model (SS-Rec 60) Version 1.1
BENEFITS
Progress
1. SMM Update
Page 6 of 26
Safety Experts
June 2010
R Hoelscher
Ops safety cords June 2010
M Sottile June 2010
21-01-2013
SES Req. Safety Management
Up to date information on safety performance Identification of Trends Positive & proactive safety management SMS reflects best practice and latest regulations Improvements identified and actively managed.
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010 - Revise Competence procedure for compliance with Royal Decree
T. Braspennincx
Ops trg & lic, IANS, ASRO
2. Safety Performance Monitoring and improvements
T. Braspennincx
P. Marien
June 2010
RISC Group Eng.Prob Man Ops.Occ Man
3. Update safety regulations compliance matrix
T. Braspennincx
As required
4. Development of Changed Regulation Action Plans
K Cartmale
T Braspennincx
5. Improve the processes for occurrence reporting and investigation to take account of higher priority needs, management briefings etc.
K Cartmale
Version 1.1
R Bartlett
Page 7 of 26
New – June 2010
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
WP 2. Type ‘A’ Safety Assessments All changes with safety significance must be introduced following the process as defined in the SMS, to produce the required assurance that the changes are acceptably safe to be used for operational purposes.
OBJECTIVES
To manage the safety risks of changes to ATM services.
To provide an interface with the Regulatory Authority to enable appropriate regulatory oversight of changes.
Maastricht UAC Implementation Activities
PLANNED DELIVERABLES
REQUIREMENTS
Safety Assurance for each Type A safety related change.
Notification to the NSA of Planned Safety Related Changes
Database containing up to date status of change acceptability
Safety Assurance verification reports
Activity Manager
Internal Support
External Support
BENEFITS
Progress
1. FDPS-211 - NFDPS - PA2
B. Whitfield
3. TMS-451 - Traffic Monitoring System – Level 1
R. Margauan
B. Whitfield
4. MODS-211 - Implementation of Mode S Elementary Surveillance (ELS) – placeholder for 2012.
N. de Lang
B. Whitfield
5. MODS-643 - Implementation of Mode S Enhanced Surveillance (EHS)
N. de Lang
B. Whitfield
G. Janssens
B. Whitfield
N. de Lang
B. Whitfield
G. Janssens
B. Whitfield
Should be closed end 2009
H. Koppe
T
March 2010
6. ECG-444 - EATMP Communications Gateway 7. SDFP-625 - Surveillance Data Front End Processor (SDFEP) 8. LINK-356 - Air/Ground Data link Implementation (P2L) 9. AMRUFRA – Reorganisation of the RKN – Version 1.1
Page 8 of 26
B. Whitfield
H. Baret C. Chevallier
2. EAD 847 - Connection to European AIS Database
SES 1315/2007
CSE
Part of PA2 for N-FDPS
21-01-2013
Management visibility of the acceptability of safety risk. Alignment of Safety Assurance and management of safety risks for changes. Providing a focal point for change notification and progress to the Regulatory Authority Coordination of cross divisional safety activities Reduce duplication of effort.
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010 ARKON Interface
Braspennincx
10. Handling Dutch Military Traffic during Weekends and nights
R. Hickson
Ops Saf Coord
11. New Voice Communications System
T Goossennaert
B Whitfield
12. CeNS
Kurt Debacker
T Braspennincx
13. Night manning
Robin Hickson
Ops Saf Coord
14. Contingency project
March 2010
E Van Releghem P Hendrickx
15. Use of MFS safety Report
Version 1.1
B Whitfield
Page 9 of 26
Type A update report
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
WP 3. Safety Training Continuous Safety Training is a fundamental building block in the development of safety competence and ensures that individuals have a clear understanding of how to discharge their safety responsibilities and understand the scope of the SMS.
OBJECTIVES
PLANNED DELIVERABLES
To continue to provide and develop safety training to support the development of Safety Competence
Maastricht UAC Implementation Activities
‘x’ Level One Introductory courses
‘x’ Level Two Courses
‘x’ Supervisory Course
‘x’ Safety Software Course
Ongoing Specialist Training
Activity Manager
Internal Support
External Support
REQUIREMENTS
1. Develop Operational Supervisory Safety course specification and training plan
R. Bartlett
2. Deliver ops supervisors safety training courses
R. Bartlett
M. Schneider
Luc Staudt
3. Develop Ops Safety Risk Management course spec and training plan (inc. handling Safety Regs & Recs)
R. Bartlett
M. Oliver
4. Deliver Ops Safety Risk Management courses
R. Bartlett
TBD
Legal Services
K. Scicluna Luc Staudt
5. Deliver Engineering Software Safety Modules
M. Khurana
M Hansen
6. Develop Just Culture Seminar/Module specification & delivery schedule
R. Bartlett
K. Scicluna
7. Deliver Just culture seminars
R. Bartlett
8. Level 3 Training
R. Bartlett
9. Deliver existing Level 2 training
R Bartlett
Legal Services
M Hansen
York Uni
M Oliver
Legal Services
B Whitfield Version 1.1
BENEFITS
Progress
Page 10 of 26
21-01-2013
04/2010
Supports the growth of a Safety Culture through improved competence Trained and informed staff Reduced Incidents Improved effectiveness of Risk Assessment mitigations.
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
WP 4. Internal & External Compliance/Regulatory Oversight The Regulator will define new rules and change existing rules. The MUAC must ensure it is able to consult and implement the required internal provisions to show compliance with these new rules and to adequately support NSA & ISO Audits.
OBJECTIVES
PLANNED DELIVERABLES
To ensure an efficient and effective regulatory interface.
To ensure compliance with all applicable Safety Regulations
To provide assurance that the safety processes are being applied effectively
REQUIREMENTS
Updated compliance matrix
EC 1315/2007
Full traceability of requirements to internal provisions
NSA Audit Manual
Corrective Action Plans for external Audis of SMS
NSA Audit Plan 2010
Inputs to USC
Safety Survey and Audit Reports, and associated CAPs
To identify improvement opportunities Maastricht UAC
Activity Manager
Implementation Activities
Internal Support
External Support
BENEFITS
Progress
NSA AUDIT PLAN - CST
CST
1.1. Safety requirements for changes (MUAC2010-A1)
As required
K Cartmale
1.2. ESARR6 Audit (MUAC-2010-A2)
K Cartmale
Q3 2010 Q3/4
Eng staff PMU safety expert 2. Internal Safety Audits and Surveys
K. Cartmale
1. Briefing Process (S) (OPS)
K. Cartmale
D. Martinez
2. Follow up audit to verify implementation of CAs from Capacity Management – Overloads (A) (OPS)
K. Cartmale
K. Scicluna
K. Cartmale
A. Collen
K. Cartmale
T Braspennincx
3. Follow up audit to verify implementation of CAs from Unit Competence Scheme (A) (OPS) 4. Post Incident Withdrawal from Duties (S) (OPS) Version 1.1
1 5
Page 11 of 26
21-01-2013
Independent verification of MUAC compliance with Safety Regulations Systematic checking of compliance with regulations and application of internal safety processes Transparency of the regulatory oversight roles and responsibilities Improve relationship with NSA/Regulatory Authorities.
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010 5. Follow up audit to verify implementation of CAs from Recommendations on followup from Safety Cases (A) (ALL)
K. Cartmale
M. Hansen
6. Survey into understanding of safety aspects of standard work activities (S) (Eng)
K. Cartmale
M Khurana
7. Follow up audit to verify implementation of CAs from comms function safety review (A) (ALL)
K Cartmale
8. Internal audit against ESARR6/EC482 (Eng)
K Cartmale
9. Survey into wearing headsets (Ops)
K Cartmale
R Bartlett
B Vandersmissen
K Cartmale
3. Compliance with ATS Engineering Personnel Common Core Content Specification
Version 1.1
M Hansen M Hansen T Braspennincx
Page 12 of 26
M Hansen
Prep started. Audit delayed till May
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
5.
SMWP 2010 PART 2 - EXCEPTIONAL ACTIVITIES
WP 5. Enhancement of the Safety Management System The SMS is in place and has been approved against applicable regulations. This work package defines the activities required to ensure that the SMS achieves “best practice” requirements and is truly effective and efficient, to ensure that the Maastricht UAC is positioned as a leading ANSP in safety activities. This work package also covers the actions required to meet the strategic principles and the objectives set out in the EUROCONTROL ATM 2000+ Strategy and the derived ESSIP 2009-2013 document as described in the Local Single Sky Implementations (LSSIP) plan for the Maastricht UAC.
OBJECTIVES
PLANNED DELIVERABLES
To enhance the SMS in line with best practice and emerging regulations.
To achieve better performance benefits in safety
Version 1.1
REQUIREMENTS
Unit Safety Case V2
Unit FHA
To meet USC roadmap Activity 2
Unit PSSA
ESARR 6 Compliance matrix
Plan of action to integrate Human Factors in to the MUAC Management System
Risk Management Model
Page 13 of 26
21-01-2013
Resolve USC Evidence Item E5.3
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
Maastricht UAC
Activity Manager
Internal Support
External Support
Implementation Activities
1. USC V2
4,5 ,8
M. Khurana
K. Cartmale
2. Human Factors Implementation Plan (LSSIP activity HUM02)
9
K. Cartmale
MMT, R Hoelscher
3. To develop a concept and plan to introduce into the Operations Room Team Safety Controllers/Focal Points.
13
L Staudt
R. Bartlett
09/2010
Safety Experts HQ HF Specialist
Needs a PM
R. Hoelscher
Ops Safety Experts
CF/HQ/NATS
02/2010
C Fricke Ernst
EGATS 5. Revamp of SMM
R. Bartlett 19
K. Cartmale
N. Shamsi
On Hold
M Sottile Divisional Safety & Quality Staff
7. Implement Supplier Software Safety Assurance Plan (imp success criteria for ANS S/W & H/W lifecycle reqs), and means to independently assess s/w from suppliers
H. Baret
8. Develop & trial the safety benefits process as part of MUAC safety strategy
K Cartmale
T. Braspennincx
9. Develop scheme to learn lessons from safety cases
K Cartmale
T. Braspennincx
10. Degraded Working Conditions SAF08
R Bartlett
Not required
11. Implement provisions of Air Ground Communications safety improvement plan (LSSIP activity SAF05)
R Bartlett
V. Stuhlsatz
K. Cartmale B. Vandersmissen B. Whitfield
ESSIP 2009 refers All actions now closed
Ops Staff as required
12. Generate and implement a local plan to reduce risks associated with Airspace Infringements (LSSIP activity Saf 10)_
Version 1.1
4. Evaluate Operations Room Survey Methodology (EUROSS)
6. Implement efficiency & effectiveness measures across Divisions and between Safety and Quality processes.
BENEFITS
Progress
No further MUAC work required
Page 14 of 26
21-01-2013
SMS can be operated effectively and efficiently. Proactive preparation for regulatory compliance for ESARR 6 related regulations. Enables Human Factor elements to be explicitly managed. Reduced Overhead for preparing safety assurance Adherence to common safety standards set for all ANSP’s.
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
WP 6. Enhance Safety Culture A Safety Culture is the product of individual and group values, attitudes, competencies and patterns of behaviour of all staff. It ensures that everyone is committed to safety in their work.
OBJECTIVES
PLANNED DELIVERABLES
Ensure adequate priority for safety;
Ensure that all staff are aware of and carry out their safety responsibilities.
To measure the Centre and Divisional Safety Cultures
To develop an action plan to improve safety culture
Version 1.1
Implemented Safety Culture Enhancement Plan
Page 15 of 26
21-01-2013
REQUIREMENTS
EEC Safety Culture Survey
USC ARG 1.1.6
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
Maastricht UAC Implementation Activities
Implement Safety Culture Action Plan Rec 1 – Safety Margins
Activity Coordinator
Internal Support
Deliverable
K. Cartmale R Hoelscher
MATCOM Update
10/2009
F Konnemann
Recs from Int comms rep implemented
12/2009
R Hoelscher
INREP includes incident bulletins
10/2009
Luc Staudt
Ops safety focal point in place + ToRs + Org set up and working
06/2010
R Hoelscher
Top ‘x’ safety issues comms method
10/2009
Luc Staudt
Improved comms of safety issues from sups to Mgmt
Closed
B Vandersmisse n
Procedure published in EQM
Closed
Luc Staudt
Incident briefings re-established + structured planning for 2011 onwards
Jan - 2011
B Vandersmisse n
Revised Inc reporting procedure published in EQM
Closed
Luc Staudt
Complement self briefings with supervisor support
06/2010
Roger Bartlett
Develop course specification for safety management training
01/2010
Roger Bartlett
Deliver supervisors safety training
06/2010
M Schneider
Introduce CBAS
Closed
Rec 7 – Tailored learning process
B Vandersmisse n
Replica of item 4b
Closed
Rec 8 – Social Areas
F Konnemann
Temporary building established which contains recreation areas
Closed
F Konnemann
Building extension planned for 2011
12/2011
Rec 2 - Top Down Comms Rec 3a – Transmission of safety concerns
Rec 3b – Extend INREP to Eng
Rec 4a – ATCO learning from Incidents Rec 4b – Eng learning from incidents
Rec 5 – Supervisor support
Rec 6 – OJTI Standards
Version 1.1
BENEFITS
Progress
Page 16 of 26
21-01-2013
Demonstrates management commitment to safety Helps reduce perception of mixed messages. Improves the effectiveness of the SMS
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010 Rec 9 – Reassess prevailing culture Rec 10a – Safety authority with respect to changes
Keith Cartmale
Introduce HF case as part of change development process
12/2010
R Hoelscher
Current CAB-O changes automatically take safety into account.
Closed
For current non CAB –O changes (e.g. Eng RfCs and PRBs that could change functionality) the following process improvements will be implemented: 1.
2.
OCPs will be raised in circumstances where RfCs can change Ops functionality; One OCP per AIRAC for ‘pure’ AIRAC changes;
3.
One OCP per AIRAC that contains adaptation data type changes;
4.
Each OCP will be safety assessed in Remedy by Ops safety coordinators;
5.
Systematic identification of affected documentation e.g. MATCOM;
6.
A validation process will be defined and implemented for operational changes which will check safety aspects have been implemented before approving the implementation
7.
Share point tool will help create improved visibility of the safety workflow for Type As and Bs and
Closed
Closed Closed
Closed
Closed 09/2010
Q2/2010
Version 1.1
Page 17 of 26
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
deliverables through improved accessibility to safety documents Rec 10b - Safety authority with respect to changes
B Vandersmisse n
Eng safety experts actively communicate with Ops safety experts. Update to CHM.10 process & CHM.03 procedure in EQM to reflect improved communications mechanisms
Closed
Rec 11 – Position of safety function
F Konnemann
1 page summary describing the safety organisation to be published on Safety Pages of Intranet.
09/2010
K Cartmale
Safety Strategy document to be published on Intranet
10/2009
L Staudt
Overload reporting and analysis to be added to Cap Mgmt scope of work.
06/2010
Rec 12 – Safety Strategy Rec 13 – Safety resources
E Eyres to be scheduled 2 office duties per week.
Rec 14 – cooperation with NSAs
M Sottile
Rec 15 – Sign off of safety responsibilities
K Cartmale
Additional resources to be recruited( 1 contract staff) to take into account additional workload and imminent retirements.
09/2010
Ongoing process – regular contact established.
Completed
Define the minimum review period for safety docs and update the SMM.
Closed
Review and shorten the req’d safety docs signatories.
06/2010
Increase information sessions to staff on liabilities for sign off of safety docs. Rec 16a – Safety training strategy
Version 1.1
K Cartmale
Page 18 of 26
Completed
A strategy paper explaining safety management training to be published on Intranet. 21-01-2013
06/2010 Closed
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010 Rec 16b – Gear Shift training
Version 1.1
M Schneider
Page 19 of 26
Deliverables in support of Rec 16 to be established
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
WP 7. Functional Airspace Block - Europe Central (FABEC) The MUAC will provide active support to help develop the processes required to deliver safety assurance for the various FABEC developments and changes.
OBJECTIVES
PLANNED DELIVERABLES
To provide MUAC contribution to FABEC Safety Standing Committee.
To ensure MUAC’s safety management requirements continue to be achieved in the FABEC context.
To obtain overall efficiencies in the management of safety within FABEC.
Maastricht UAC Implementation Activities
FABEC Safety Processes
FABEC Safety Assurance for changes.
Activity Manager
Internal Support
BENEFITS
Progress
1. Support to FABEC Safety Standing Committee activities.
K. Cartmale
T Braspennincx
2. Support the occurrence management subgroup
K Cartmale
T Braspennincx
3. Lead the development of the FABEC overall safety case
K Cartmale
Version 1.1
External Support
Safety Experts
Page 20 of 26
New – Target June 2011
21-01-2013
Enables the MUAC to contribute to the future direction of ATM in Europe Enable MUAC to prepare for the future development of ATM in Europe Enables internal MUAC expertise to grow in a wider European dimension. Enable networking and team working with adjacent ANSP’s.
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
5.
APPROVAL, CHANGE RECORD AND PROGRESS COLOUR KEY
5.1
Approval This document is approved by the Safety Management Committee.
5.2
5.3
Change Record
EDITION NUMBER
EDITION
REASON FOR CHANGE
PAGES
0.1
05.10.09
Safety Manager drafted plan following 3rd Safety Coordination workshop
All
0.2
09.12.09
Further development and to resolve comments made by Engineering
All
0.3
09.12.09
Update to WP6 recs 6 and 10a
1.0
17.12.09
Update to pages 3, 9 & 13. Up-issue to V1.0.
16 & 17 All
Progress Colour Coding
Not Started Ongoing Problematic Completed
Version 1.1
Page 21 of 26
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
Version 1.1
Page 22 of 26
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
ANNEX 1 – RESOURCE ESTIMATE Notes. 1.
Some activities are subject to more detailed planning. In such cases the resource estimates are supplied in the detailed plans (where available), and are summarised here.
2.
Safety Experts/staff colour code: - Dir Saf ; OPS; ENG; HRFGS; PMU.
3.
I/D WP1 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 1.1.5 1.1.6 1.1.7 1.2 1.3 1.4 WP2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 Version 1.1
= estimate for Non safety staff
Activity Sustain the SMS Saf mon processes update Incorporate EUROSS into SMS Finalise SAP predefined change process Type B change interface with NSA Update Safety Organisation Procedure Update Plan Procedure Revise Competence procedure Safety Performance Monitoring and improvements Update of compliance matrix Changed Regulation Action plans development Sub Total WP1 Type A safety assessments FDPS PA 2 EAD TMS Mode S ELS Mode S EHS ECG SDFEP AGDL (DL-FEP) AMRUFRA Dutch Mil Traffic Handling NVCS Page 23 of 26
Estimated Support Effort in man days
Schedule/Notes
5, 1, 1. 0 5, 5 , 0. 0 5, 5, 0. 0 5, 1 , 1, 0 2, 1, 1, 1 2, 0, 0, 2 5, 2 , 0, 0 50, 380, 20, 0 5, 0, 0. 0 6, 0, 0. 0 90, 399, 23, 3
Towards end 2010 Towards mid 2010 Towards mid 2010 Towards mid 2010 Towards end 2010 Towards end 2010 Towards mid 2010 Spread over year Towards end 2010 Spread over year
2, 0, 0, 20 2, 0, 0, 10 2, 0, 0, 2 0, 0, 0, 0 0, 0, 0, 2 6, 0, 0, 60 2, 0, 1, 5 2, 0, 0, 5 2, 6, 1, 0 2, 15, 1, 0 7, 0, 0, 40
Part of FDPS PA2 2012 Feb 2010 Starts in earnest in 2010 after contract signature Feb 2010 for closure Should be closed prior to 2010 Closed March 2010 40 man days in 2010, 40 in 2011. imp 2013. 21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
I/D 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 WP3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 WP4 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.5 4.2.6 4.2.7 4.2.8 4.2.9 WP5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.10 Version 1.1
Activity
Estimated Support Effort in man days
CeNS Night manning Contingency Project Use of MFS safety Report Sub Total WP2 Safety Training Operations Supervisors Course dev & plan Operations Supervisors Course delivery Ops Safety Risk Management course dev & plan Ops Safety Risk Management course(s) delivery Eng Level 2 course S/w safety mods delivery Just Culture modules dev & Plan Just Culture modules delivery Level 3 training Deliver Level 2 training Sub Total WP3 Internal & External Compliance/Reg Oversight Support ext audit – Saf Reqs for changes Support ext audit – ESARR6 Int Survey – briefing process Follow up audit Overloads Follow up audit UCS Survey – post incident withdrawals Follow up audit safety case recs Survey of understanding of eng safety roles and standard support processes Follow up audit comms function Internal audit against ESARR6/EC482 Survey Headsets Sub Total WP4 SMS Enhancement USC V2 HF imp plan Operations Room Team safety focal points Operations Room safety survey methodology SMM revamp Efficiency & effectiveness measures Software safety assurance improvements Safety benefits process Safety case lessons learnt scheme Activity deleted – no longer required by LSSIP Page 24 of 26
Schedule/Notes
2, 15, 1, 0 2, 15, 1, 0 2, 0, 20, 20 0, 0, 0, 1 33, 51, 25, 165
TBD Early 2010
10, 10, 0, 0 5, 36, 0, 0 10, 10, 0, 0 2, 15, 0, 0 1, 0, 10, 0 10, 0, 0, 0 4, 0, 0, 0 1, TBD, 15 0 2, 0, 4, 2 45, 71, 29, 2
Now urgent – needs to be in place 01/2010 To be completed by 06/2010 See Section 3 See Section 3 See Section 3 See Section 3 Throughout 2010 Eng, already scheduled. Ops may need to nominate new staff PMU 2 MDs per course
3, 3, 3, 3 3, 0, 3, 1 5, 2, 0, 0 1, 1, 0, 0 1, 1, 0, 0 5, 2, 0, 0 1, 1, 0, 0 5, 0, 5, 0
See Section 3 See Section 3 See Section 3 See Section 3 See Section 3 See Section 3 See Section 3 See Section 3
1, 0, 1, 0 10, 0, 10, 0 5, 1, 0, 0 40, 11, 22, 4
See Section 3 See Section 3 See Section 3
52, 10 , 23 , 9 TBD, TBD , TBD , TBD, TBD 1, 2, 0, 0 5, 5, 0, 0 ?, ?, ?, ? 5, 1, 1, 1 5, 0, 5, 20, 5, 0, 0, 0 5, 1, 1, 1
See Notes 2 & 3. Completion due Sep 2010. See Note 2 – will be developed in 2010 Early 2010 Mar-Apr Currently on-hold’ pending resource resolution Throughout 2010 Detailed plan to be assembled Early 2010 Mid 2010
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
I/D 5.11 5.12 WP6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.10 6.11 6.13 6.15 6.16 WP7 7.1 7.2
Activity AGA Saf Imp plan implementation Airspace infringement risk reduction Sub Total WP5 Enhance Safety Culture Rec 1 implementation Rec 2 implementation Rec 3 implementation Rec 4 implementation Rec 5 implementation Rec 6 implementation Rec 7 implementation Rec 8 implementation Rec 9 implementation Rec 10 implementation Rec 11 implementation Rec 13 implementation Rec 15 implementation Rec 16 implementation Sub Total WP6 FABEC FABEC safety standing Committee Occ management sub-group Sub Total WP7 OVERALL TOTAL
Version 1.1
Page 25 of 26
Estimated Support Effort in man days
Schedule/Notes
3, 3, 2, 0 0, 0, 0, 0 81, 22, 32, 30
Throughout 2010 No further MUAC action required.
0, 5 , 0, 0 See Note 2 0, 5 , 0, 0 0, 5, 0, 0 0, 2 , 0, 0 0, TBD, 0, 0 0, 0, 0, 0 See Note 2 10, 5, 2, 5 0, 10 , 0, 0 1, 0, 0, 0 0, 10 , 0, 0 5, 1, 1, 1 2, 10 , 0, 0 18, 48, 3, 6
See WP6 See WP6 See WP6 See WP6 Refer also to WP 3.1 & 3.2. See WP6 See WP6 Refer to WP 6.4 Building extension planned for 2011 Refer also to WP 5.2 See WP6 See WP6 See WP6 See WP6 See WP6
30, 0, 0, 0 20, 0, 0, 0 50, 0, 0, 0
Throughout 2010 Throughout 2010
357, 602, 134, 210
Note – excludes effort for safety assessment of minor changes
21-01-2013
Maastricht UAC – Safety Management Work Programme 2010
ANNEX 2 - DIVISIONAL SAFETY STAFF A2.1 Operations R. Hoelscher K. Scicluna D. Martinez C. Fricke-Ernst
P Marien (for activity 1.2 only) D Hoyng (for activity 1.2 only) E Eyres (for activity 1.2 only)
RISC Group Members (for activity 1.2 only) J Hendrickx (for activity 1.2 only)
A2.2 Engineering M. Hansen M. Khurana
N Trklja (for activity 1.2 only)
A2.3 PMU B. Whitfield
A2.4 Dir Safety R Bartlett T Braspennincx K Cartmale
Version 1.1
Page 26 of 26
21-01-2013