30 minute read
Development of a remote-controlled rockbolting system for narrow-seam hard-rock mines
from Saimm 202001 jan
by SAIMM
D.M. O’Connor 1 and T. Sertic 2
Advertisement
Affiliation: 1 Minova, South Africa. 2 Dok-ing Africa (Pty) Ltd, South Africa.
Correspondence to: D.M. O’Connor
Email: donald.oconnor@minovaglobal. com
Dates: Received: 29 Jul. 2019 Revised: 28 Nov. 2019 Accepted: 29 Nov. 2019 Published: January 2020
How to cite: O’Connor, D.M. and Sertic, T. Development of a remotecontrolled rockbolting system for narrow-seam hard-rock mines. The Southern African Insitute of Mining and Metallurgy
DOI ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2411- 9717/851/2020
This paper was first presented at the Deep Mining 2019 Conference, 24–25 June 2019 Misty Hills Conference Centre, Muldersdrift, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Synopsis This development of a semi-automated, remotely-controlled rockbolting system for use in hard-rock mines with a mining height of between 0.9 m and 1.2 m is described. The rockbolting system required development of fully mechanized, remote-controlled rockbolting rig, novel rockbolts, and a pumpable, fast-acting resin grout to secure the bolts.
The rockbolter is one component of an equipment suite enabling full mechanization of rock-breaking by blasting, clearing of the broken rock and rock support. Development started in 2012 and the bolter has been operating on a platinum mine since 2017. Deployment of further equipment suites is planned for 2019.
Keywords rockbolting, mechanization, automation, narrow reef, pumpable resin.
Introduction An estimated 90% of South Africa’s gold-bearing reefs are less than 1 m thick (Joughin, 1976). A large mineral resource therefore lies in seams that are becoming increasingly uneconomic to extract because of the grade dilution caused by raising the mining height to suit currently available mechanized mining equipment (Harper, 2008). A similar situation applies to platinum resources.
Historically in South Africa, mining of these low seams has been carried out by labour-intensive methods, with little equipment beyond hand-operated rock drills. However, the arduous and hazardous work environment is becoming increasingly unattractive to both the workforce and to mine operators. Meanwhile, globally, major mining companies are striving to increase safety by removing people from the immediate vicinity of the operations, and to increase productivity by better integration of the phases of the regular mining cycle to reduce cycle times (Lynch and White, 2013). Attaining both objectives requires going beyond mechanization to high degrees of automation and/or remote control of equipment.
These factors present a challenge to South African mine operators and their equipment suppliers as mechanization of the low-seam, hard-rock mining environment has proven difficult and successes have been few (Pickering and Ebner, 2006; Harper, 2008).
This paper describes the development of a semi-automated, remotely-controlled rockbolting system for use in hard-rock mines with a mining height of between 0.9 m and 1.2 m. The rockbolting, system required development of fully mechanized, remote-controlled rockbolting rig, novel rockbolts and a pumpable, fast-acting resin grout to secure the bolts.
The introduction of systematic rockbolting has resulted in a decrease of rock-related accidents but the many manual operations required in drill-steel and bolt handling, in confined spaces and close proximity to high-powered equipment, has led to an increase in injuries (particularly hand injuries) to the rockbolting operators themselves (Makusha: 2015). The introduction of remote-controlled equipment has the potential to remedy this situation.
The rockbolter is one component of an equipment suite enabling full mechanization of rockbreaking by blasting, clearing of the broken rock, and rock support (the Ultra Low Profile Project – ULP). Development started in 2012 and the bolter has been operating on a platinum mine since 2017. Deployment of further equipment suites is planned for 2019.
User requirement specifications for the equipment To achieve the production targets of the fully mechanized mining operation, the key performance parameters for the bolting operation were set as follows.
➤ Nominal bolting speed of 8 minutes between collaring one hole and collaring of the following hole ➤ Total cycle time to drill 30 bolts (1.6 m drilling) shall not exceed 2 hours ➤ Two 30 m panels should be drilled in one production shift. In addition, there were comprehensive specifications regarding safety of operations and functionality in the envisaged low stope environment.
Performance and operational requirements for the rockbolts The standard support design for the stopes in the test area uses 1.6 m long deformed bar rockbolts, either 20 mm or 18 mm diameter. The bolts themselves have a nominal ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 170–200 kN (RSC Ekusasa, 2007) and must achieve a pull-out load of at least 100 kN on 250 mm of resin bond in the short encapsulation pull test (SEPT) method generally used in the South African platinum mining industry. Most rockbolts used in South Africa are made from steel with a UTS of 550–600 MPa, with steel up to 850 MPa for more advanced bolts.
Rockbolts to be used with the ULP project had to achieve at least the same performance as the conventional deformed bar rockbolts. Analysis of conventional rockbolting operations and rockbolts showed that the bolts were not well suited to the mechanized, automated bolting called for. ➤ The need to install 1.6 m long bolts in a mining height of <1.2 m indicated that the drill steels used would have to be coupled ➤ The rockbolts themselves would also have to be coupled or flexible (cable anchors) ➤ Extraction of the coupled drill steel segments after drilling each hole and storage so that they would be available for the next hole appeared to be a difficult process to mechanize and automate ➤ Installation of cable anchors is also a difficult process to fully mechanize and automate ➤ Handling of conventional resin or grout capsules is equally difficult to mechanize and automate because of their loss of rigidity. Although this is normally considered to be an ageing issue, O’Connor (2014) showed that resin capsules lose rigidity simply by being transported to a region of higher ambient pressure, such as in a deep mine ➤ The normal bolting cycle of drill – remove drill steels – insert grout capsules – insert bolt – spin bolt – tighten bolt is time-consuming and presents several situations (e.g. drill steels failing to extract), requiring human operator intervention. An alternative that presented itself was ‘self-drilling rockbolts’ (SDRs, also known as SDAs – ‘self-drilling anchors’). An SDR consists of a hollow steel rod (or coupled rods) with a sacrificial drill bit. The steel rod serves as the drill steel during the drilling phase. It is left in the drill-hole and the central flushing hole is used to inject cement or resin grout to fill the external annulus between the steel rod and the rock, so fixing the rod into the hole. The rod then functions as a rockbolt. The use of SDRs is well established in the mining and construction industries (Minova-MAI, 2017) for rockbolting in very unstable ground, where the drill-holes close or collapse between withdrawal of the drill rod and insertion of a rockbolt.
SDRs are made of high-grade steel as they need to withstand the stresses of drilling and the design loads in their service as rockbolts. Typical steel specification for an SDR is a UTS of 600–860 MPa (Minova-MAI, 2017). The external surface is deformed into a continuous coarse thread profile, for example a ‘rope’ thread with pitch of 12 mm and depth of 4.8 mm. The threaded profile increases axial shear resistance between the SDR and the surrounding grout, and is also used to attach accessories such as the sacrificial drill bit, centralizers, and couplings.
The use of commonly-available SDRs was considered but it became apparent that they were unsuitable. Conventional SDRs use external sleeve couplings to couple segments together. The sleeve couplings have a substantially larger diameter than the SDR itself, forcing the use of a larger bit and creating a large annulus around the bolt to be filled by the grout. Typical data for a 25 mm diameter SDR system is presented in Table I (MinovaMAI, 2017).
Sleeve couplings are also expensive. In the mainstream use of SDRs, the rods are typically 2–4 m long, so few couplings are needed to make up a drill string. However, in this project, the maximum length of the SDR segments was limited to 400 mm, so four couplings would be needed for a 1.6 m bolt.
An alternative type of SDR was sought. We found an unusual SDR rod manufactured in South Africa. Termed ‘NCA steel’ it is a 25 mm diameter drill steel with external rebar-type deformations. It had been manufactured on a small scale for specialized rehabilitation of concrete structures. The central flushing hole is only 11 mm in diameter, leaving a cross-sectional area of 396 mm 2 – greater than that of the 20 mm conventional solid rockbolt. NCA steel had not been coupled previously. NCA steel has a minimum tensile strength of 940 MPa (ArcelorMittal, 2017). The high strength combined with the larger cross-sectional area allowed design of a taper-threaded internal coupling (see Figure 1). This avoided the hole diameter increase associated with conventional sleeve couplings.
Prototype NCA rods with the internal taper-threaded couplings were made up and tensile strength tests were conducted at a SANAS-accredited test facility. Minimum breaking load was 176 KN. This qualified the coupled NCA steel as being strong enough for the SDR component of the rockbolting system.
Drilling method – percussion or rotary? Early in the project a decision had to be taken on the drilling method to use: percussion or rotary, as the choice was fundamental to the design and equipping of the rig as well as to configuration of the rockbolts/drill rods.
Table I 25 mm diameter grouted conventional SDR system
Figure 1—Cutaway view of taper-threaded internal coupling
Figure 2—General view of drilling test rig
Compressive strengths (UCS) of hangingwall rocks in South Africa’s gold and platinum mines are in the range of 120 MPa to over 250 MPa. Conventional production drilling in such rock is by percussion drills (Pickering and Ebner, 2001). There was limited data available on use of rotary drilling in hard rock. In 2003 one of the authors tested rotary drilling in the hangingwall at a platinum mine, using a hand-held bolter (‘Turbo-bolter’) and found that it was feasible.
Comparison of rotary and percussion drilling was carried out and the findings are summarized in Table II.
The comparison showed that rotary drilling was conceptually more suited to integration into the compact, low-height bolter rig but actual drilling capability and equipment specification were still unknown.
To confirm the feasibility of routine rotary drilling in hard rock and to gather data for equipment design, an instrumented drilling test rig was built (Figure 2).
The test rig enabled drilling with controllable thrust and rotation speed, while measuring instantaneous penetration rate and torque. Norite (UCS 200 MPa) was used for the drilling trials. NCA drill rods were made up with shaped heads, into which tungsten carbide (TC) inserts were brazed (Figure 3). The TC inserts were 30 mm wide, resulting in holes with a diameter 5 mm greater than the 25 mm diameter NCA drill rods, for flushing of the drill chippings. Water was used for flushing.
Using the test rig, 56 holes were drilled between February and April 2013. This demonstrated that: ➤ Rotary drilling of norite with standard TC borers is feasible. Penetration rates exceeding 1.5 m/min were consistently achieved and the TC inserts lasted the required 1.6 m of drilling depth (Figure 4) ➤ The NCA steel and the internal taper-threaded couplings were successful as drill rods.
Figure 3—Drill bit for rotary drilling
Figure 4—Enlarged view of drill bit after drilling a 1.6 m hole
Extensive data on the penetration rate versus thrust and torque was obtained for design of the drilling head on the bolter and setting operating parameters. The best results were obtained
Issue Drilling Technology Rotary Percussion
Technology risk High – limited experience and data available in hard rock Low: well established technology in hard rock Power source Electric: suitable for battery supply Hydraulic : large power pack required; Vibration levels and impact on surrounding equipment Low: low impact on surrounding equipment Very high; surrounding equipment must be rugged Sound level Lower – can be made < 85 dBa High to very high (>95 dBa) Drifter length Can be made compact Long – typically over 600 mm
at high rotation speed (700 r/min) and thrust in the range 40–50 kN (O’Connor, 2013). A bilinear regression calculation on drill penetration rate versus rotation speed and thrust in the ranges tested gave:
Penetration rate (mm/min) = 1.29 r/min + 4.44 thrust (kN) In 2018 a further series of drilling tests was carried out using an actual bolter, drilling into a large block of norite set up in a surface workshop. The results are reported in Appendix I.
Grouting of the self-drilling rockbolts The user requirement of short hole-to-hole cycle time required a fast-setting grout. The bolter rig needed to move on to the following hole within seconds of completing an installation and the grout had to build strength rapidly to provide effective support. Speed had to be balanced with a working time long enough for the grout to be pumped through the bolt and fill the hole before setting.
Conventional bolted stope support uses resin capsules with a 30 second or 60 second setting time (Maepa and Zvarivadza, 2017) and these times formed the benchmark for performance of the pumped grout system. At the time of development (2012–2104) there were no cement grouts available that met these requirements. A two-component resin grout had been developed (Richter, 2005) for use with SDRs and we decided to test this material. The resin grout is an organo-silicate system, supplied as two liquids with viscosities in the range 150–300 mPa.s (Minova Carbotech, 2017). When the two components are vigorously mixed, a two-stage chemical reaction takes place. In the first stage, the mixture thickens and becomes thixotropic, but is still pumpable. This prevents the material from flowing out of the hole and ensures that the annulus around the bolt is completely filled. In the second stage, polymerization of the organic phase and precipitation of solid silica take place, resulting in a solid grout. The resin grout first used had an initial hardening time (i.e. the time at which the bolter rig could release the bolt) of 60 seconds and reached full strength in 6 hours. Discussions with the manufacturer prompted further development and these times have now been shortened to 20 seconds and 60 minutes respectively. Variants of the same resin grout are being used in automated rockbolting developments elsewhere in the world (Bray and Johnsson, 2019).
The fast reaction time of the resin requires near in-situ mixing. For this, single-use static mixers are incorporated into the base of each bolt. Workshop trials carried out to determine the length of static mixer required to produce complete mixing showed that an ‘X’ type static mixer 100 mm in length was adequate (Figure 5).
The properties and performance of the resin grout used in 2018 are shown in Table III.
Testing and qualification
Field short encapsulation pull testing Individual segments of the SDRs were installed in 250 mm deep holes drilled in the hangingwall at a platinum mine near Rustenburg in July 2015. The holes were 30 mm diameter and were pre-drilled using a conventional roofbolter. After installation, the bolts were pulled with a hand-operated hydraulic ram at different times after installation. The results are shown in Table IV.
Salient outcomes from the tests were: ➤ There were many aspects of the installation and testing process that had to be learned and mastered before consistent results were achieved
Table III Resin grout properties (at 25°C)
Property Component A Component B Mixed grout
Major constituent Sodium Silicate Poly-isocyanate Viscosity (mPa-.s) 200–300 140–240 Relative density 1.43 1.16 Initial thickening (s) 3–10 Initial set (s) 20–100 Shore D hardness at 30 minutes 60
Table IV Underground SEPT results
Hole no. Cure time Max. load Notes (min) (KN)
3 90 120 1
3B 1440 150 2
4 1440 150 2
5 1440 125 2
6 1440 150 2
7 1440 150 2
7 1440 160 2
15 1440 150 2
16 1440 110
17 1440 100
18 1440 60
19 1440 75 1
20 1440 75 2
1A 56 40 2 2A 63 200 2
3A 76 170 2
4A 88 230 2
5A 92 160 2
6A 98 200 2
7A 102 200 2
8A 107 200 2
10A 51 110 3
11A 42 200 2
Notes: 1. Installation failure 2. Test stopped before failure 3. Rock failed
Both the resin bond and the bolts themselves achieved the design loads.
Proof-of-concept trials, 2015 The complete rockbolting system was subjected to a proof-ofconcept (POC) trial at the same platinum mine. After the initial development of operating procedures, measurements were made of cycle times. A typical cycle is shown in Table V.
The POC trial showed that the ULP bolting system was able to achieve close to the user specification of installing one SDR in 8 minutes or less.
Excluding downtime and externally-caused delays the drilling times achieved were between 06:49 and 07:22 minutes.
Current status The system has been in use at a platinum mine on the eastern limb of the Bushveld Complex since 2017. Since 2015 the bolter rig has undergone significant evolution on the basis of operational experience. Figure 6 and 7 show the 2014 and 2019 versions respectively – the later version is more compact, lighter, and provides easier access for maintenance. The two drilling booms each incorporate staking rods that stabilize the booms during drilling, ensuring consistent alignment between the SDR segments and between the base of the drill string and the drilling head/resin injection ports.
Table V Drilling and grouting cycle times
Activity Start time End time Total time
Move machine 0 0 00:00:00
Line up booms 11:33:55 11:34:49 00:00:54
SDR Rod Installation
Load 1st SDR 11:35:22 11:35:52 00:00:30
Drill 1st SDR 11:35:52 11:37:00 00:01:08
Load 2nd SDR 11:37:00 11:37:15 00:00:15
Drill 2nd SDR 11:37:15 11:38:57 00:01:42
Load 3rd SDR 11:38:57 11:39:15 00:00:18
Drill 3rd SDR 11:39:15 11:41:31 00:02:16
Load 4th SDR 11:41:31 11:41:48 00:00:17
Drill 4th SDR 11:41:48 11:43:34 00:01:46
Resin injection 11:43:34 11:43:44 00:00:10
Total time to install SDR 00:08:22
The Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Figure 7—2019 version of the bolter rig
As mentioned previously, the rockbolter is part of an equipment suite. The stope layout was re-designed for compatibility with the strengths and limitations of the equipment suite. The bolter is steered manually (using radio remote control) when moving between stope panels. The layout avoids the need to cross obstructions such as gullies.
Conclusions A multi-year development programme involving users and equipment suppliers has resulted in a working system for automated and remote-controlled rockbolting in hard-rock mines with tabular stopes less than 1 m high. The cycle times already achieved and the removal of the operators from the immediate vicinity of the operation have the potential to bring about improvements in the productivity and safety of existing operations, mainly located in South Africa. In the longer term, the suite of ultra-low-profile mining equipment may allow some narrow orebodies, currently considered as uneconomic to mine, to be re-classified as mineral reserves.
References Are or-mitt . 2017. Material test certificates. Vereeniging, South Africa. Br , P. and John on, A. 2019. Case study: LKAB Malmberget, self-drilling anchors and pumpable resin. Proceedings of DeepMine 2019. Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg H r er, G.S. 2008. Nederburg miner. Proceedings of the Narrow Vein and Reef Symposium. Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg. pp. 2–4. J ou hin, N.C. 1976. Potential for the mechanization of stoping in gold mines. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 76, no. 1. https:// www.saimm.co.za/journal/v076n06p285.pdf L n h, M. and White, B. 2013. Brave new world of autonomous mining systems. Proceedings of the World Gold Conference, Brisbane. Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne. pp. 157–166. M e , T. and Zv riv dz , T. 2017. Installation of resin-grouted rockbolts in hardrock mining: Challenges and solutions for improved safety. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 117, no. 4. pp. 329–336. https://www.saimm.co.za/journal/v117n04p329.pdf M ku h , G. 2015. Personal communication. Minov -M i. 2017. Self-drilling systems product catalogue. Feistritz/Drau, Austria. pp. 3–10, 16. Minov C r ote h. 2017. Carbothix 150709 technical data sheet. Essen Germany. O’ onnor, D. 2014. Effect of atmospheric pressure on resin capsule rigidity. Proceedings of the SANIRE Coalfields Branch Symposium, November 2014. South African National Institute of Rock Engineering O’ onnor, D. 2013. Interim report on rotary drilling trials in norite. Minova Africa (Pty) Ltd, Johannesburg. Pi kerin , R. and E ner, B. 2001. Hard rock cutting and development of a continuous mining machine for narrow platinum reefs. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Mine Mechanisation and Automation. Southern african institute of mining and metallurgy, Johannesburg. https://www.saimm.co.za/journal/ v102n01p019.pdf . Ri hter, A. 2005. A method for embedding rock anchors. Australian patent application 2005297473 b2, 2005. R eku . 2007. Product datasheet. Rsc Ekusasa Mining, Johannesburg.
Appendix I
Second series of rotary drilling trials In December 2018 a second programme of rotary drilling trials was carried out as part of ongoing system improvement. This programme used an actual bolter to carry out the drilling; the results could therefore be applied directly to optimize drilling parameters and practice.
The holes were drilled into a large block of quarried norite, supported on a frame to simulate the hangingwall of a stope (Figure I-1).
Two series of tests were carried out, one with ’soft collaring’ of the bit and one without. Soft collaring used a slow approach of the bit to the rock face and a gradual ramp-up of thrust and rotation speed. It was intended to reduce the likelihood of the bit shattering on contact with the rock. The tests measured drilling time against rotation speed at different thrust settings. Drill bit condition was recorded after each hole.
The results are summarized in Figures I-2 and I-3. Findings ➤ Increasing thrust force results in a reduction in drilling time, but when thrust exceeded 3 t (30 kN) there was a heightened risk of premature bit failure. ➤ For each thrust setting, there was an indication of an optimal rotation speed. When the rotation speed exceeded 600 r/min there was heightened risk of premature bit failure. ➤ There was no significant difference in time when drilling with soft collaring and not using soft collaring. ➤ The drill bits were capable of drilling at least 1.6 m in the hard norite, provided that the thrust was limited to 3 t (30 kN) and the rotation speed less than 600 r/min. u
Figure I-1—ULPSR 002 in drilling position
Figure I-2 –Average times with collaring
Date: 27-28 May 2020 Venue: Glenhove Events Hub Melrose Estate, Johannesburg
Exploration is a critical component of the development and sustainability of the minerals industry, in any resource endowed country. Southern Africa still has vast untapped mineral resources, yet the level of exploration is at an all-time low.
• Policies and Legal Issues • Brownfields/Greenfields Exploration • What are the potential successes • Strategic/Local Success • Technology • Data Modelling • Financing and Funding
Conference Coordinator: Camielah Jardine, Head of Conferencing E-mail: camielah@saimm.co.za Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7
NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES
2020 23–26 February — 2020 SME Annual Conference & Expo Phoenix, Arizona, USA Website: http://www.smeannualconference.com
1–4 March 2020 — PDAC 2020 Convention Metro Toronto Convention Centre, Toronto, Canada Contact: info@pdac.ca / convention@pdac.ca Website: https://www.pdac.ca/convention
8 March 2020 — International Womens Day Luncheon Series 2020 Sydney Australia Website: https://www.internationalwomensday.com
10–14 March 2020 — CONEXPO 2020 Las Vegas, NV Website: https://www.conexpoconagg.com
17–18 March 2020 — 5th Young Professionals Conference 2020 The Canvas, Riversands, Fourways Contact: Camielah Jardine Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: camielah@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
25–26 March 2020 — GMG Forum Glenhove Events Hub, Melrose Estate Contact: Gugu Charlie Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: gugu@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
25–27 March 2020 — Underground Operations 2020 Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre, Perth Western Australia Website: https://undergroundoperators.ausimm.com
1–2 April 2020 — Mines and Money Asia 2020 Hong Kong Convention & Exhibition Centre, Hong Kong E-mail: asia@minesandmoney.com Website: https://asia.minesandmoney.com
22 April 2020 — Reconnecting with the Future Workshop The Equinox Leadership and Innovation Centre, Sandhurst Contact: Camielah Jardine Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: camielah@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za 21–23 April 2020 — MiningWorld Russia 24th International exhibition of machines and equipment for mining, processing and transportation of minerals Crocus Expo, Moscow, Russia Website: https://www.miningworld.ru/en-GB/
3–6 May 2020 — CIM Convention and Expo Vancouver, Canada Website: https://convention.cim.org
10–13 May 2020 — Uranium 2020 Saskatoon, Canada Website: https://u2020.metsoc.org
10–13 May 2020 — 8th Annual Current Trends in Mining Finance (CTMF) Conference 2020 New York Website: https://community.smenet.org
12–13 May 2020 — Digitalization in Mining Conference 2020 The Canvas, Riversands, FourwaysContact: Gugu Charlie Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: gugu@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
23–30 May 2020 — ALTA 2020 Nickel-Cobalt-Copper, Uranium-REE, Gold-PM, In Situ Recovery, Lithium & Battery Technology Conference & Exhibition Perth, Australia Contact: Allison Taylor Tel: +61 411 692 442 E-mail: allisontaylor@altamet.com.au Website: https://www.altamet.com.au/conferences/alta2020/
25–29 May 2020 — The 11th International Conference on Molten Slags, Fluxes and Salts 2020 The Westin Chosun Seoul Hotel, Seoul, Korea Website: http://www.molten2020.org
27–28 May 2020 — Revitalising Exploration Activity in Southern Africa 2020 Glenhove Events Hub, Melrose Estate Contact: Camielah Jardine Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: camielah@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
3–5 June 2020 — ROLLS6 2020 London, UK, Website: http://www.rolls6.org/home
7–11 June 2020 — NAT2020 North American Tunneling Conference Nashville, Tennessee Website: http://www.natconference.com
NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES
9–11 June 2020 — Diamonds – Source to Use — 2020 Conference The Birchwood Hotel & OR Tambo Conference Centre Contact: Camielah Jardine Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: camielah@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
14–17 June 2020 — 2nd European Mineral Processing and Recycling Congress – EMPRC 2020 Aachen, Germany Contact: Jürgen Zuchowski, Email: gdmb@gdmb.de Website: https://emprc.gdmb.de
22–23 June 2020 — Renewable Solutions for an Energy Intensive Industry Colloquium Kathu, Northern Cape Contact: Camielah Jardine Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: camielah@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
24–25 June 2020 — 3rd School on Manganese Ferroalloy Production 2020 Kathu, Northern Cape Contact: Gugu Charlie Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: gugu@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
22–23 July 2020 — 5th Mineral Project Valuation Colloquium Glenhove Events Hub, Melrose Estate Contact: Gugu Charlie Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: gugu@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
18–19 August 2020 — SAMCODES Conference The Birchwood Hotel & OR Tambo Conference Centre Contact: Camielah Jardine Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: camielah@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
20–21 August 2020 — Mine Health and Safery Conference Misty Hills Country Hotel & Conference Centre Contact: Camielah Jardine Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: camielah@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
4–7 October 2020 — Massmin 2020 Eight International Conference on Mass Mining Santiago, Chile, Contact: J.O. Gutiérrez Tel: (56-2) 2978 4476 Website: www.minas.uchile.cl
18–22 October 2020 — IMPC XXX International Mineral Processing Congress 2020 Cape Town International Convention Centre, Cape Town Contact: Camielah Jardine Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: camielah@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
18–22 October 2020 — IMPC Congress Cape Town International Convention Centre, Cape Town Contact: Camielah Jardine Tel: +27 11 834-1273/7 Fax: +27 11 838-5923/833-8156 E-mail: camielah@saimm.co.za Website: http://www.saimm.co.za
3M South Africa (Pty) Limited AECOM SA (Pty) Ltd AEL Mining Services Limited Air Liquide (PTY) Ltd Alexander Proudfoot Africa (Pty) Ltd AMEC Foster Wheeler AMIRA International Africa (Pty) Ltd ANDRITZ Delkor (Pty) Ltd Anglo Operations Proprietary Limited Anglogold Ashanti Ltd Arcus Gibb (Pty) Ltd ASPASA Atlas Copco Holdings South Africa (Pty) Limited Aurecon South Africa (Pty) Ltd Aveng Engineering Aveng Mining Shafts and Underground Axiom Chemlab Supplies (Pty) Ltd Axis House Pty Ltd Bafokeng Rasimone Platinum Mine Barloworld Equipment -Mining BASF Holdings SA (Pty) Ltd BCL Limited Becker Mining (Pty) Ltd BedRock Mining Support Pty Ltd BHP Billiton Energy Coal SA Ltd Blue Cube Systems (Pty) Ltd Bluhm Burton Engineering Pty Ltd Bond Equipment (Pty) Ltd Bouygues Travaux Publics CDM Group CGG Services SA Coalmin Process Technologies CC Concor Opencast Mining Concor Technicrete Council for Geoscience Library CRONIMET Mining Processing SA Pty Ltd CSIR Natural Resources and the Environment (NRE) Data Mine SA Digby Wells and Associates DRA Mineral Projects (Pty) Ltd DTP Mining - Bouygues Construction Duraset Elbroc Mining Products (Pty) Ltd eThekwini Municipality Ex Mente Technologies (Pty) Ltd Expectra 2004 (Pty) Ltd Exxaro Coal (Pty) Ltd Exxaro Resources Limited Filtaquip (Pty) Ltd FLSmidth Minerals (Pty) Ltd Fluor Daniel SA ( Pty) Ltd Franki Africa (Pty) Ltd-JHB Fraser Alexander (Pty) Ltd G H H Mining Machines (Pty) Ltd Geobrugg Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd Glencore Hall Core Drilling (Pty) Ltd Hatch (Pty) Ltd Herrenknecht AG HPE Hydro Power Equipment (Pty) Ltd Immersive Technologies IMS Engineering (Pty) Ltd Ingwenya Mineral Processing (Pty) Ltd Ivanhoe Mines SA Joy Global Inc. (Africa) Kudumane Manganese Resources Leco Africa (Pty) Limited Leica Geosystems (Pty) Ltd Longyear South Africa (Pty) Ltd Lull Storm Trading (Pty) Ltd Maccaferri SA (Pty) Ltd Magnetech (Pty) Ltd Magotteaux (Pty) Ltd Malvern Panalytical (Pty) Ltd Maptek (Pty) Ltd Maxam Dantex (Pty) Ltd MBE Minerals SA Pty Ltd MCC Contracts (Pty) Ltd MD Mineral Technologies SA (Pty) Ltd MDM Technical Africa (Pty) Ltd Metalock Engineering RSA (Pty)Ltd Metorex Limited Metso Minerals (South Africa) Pty Ltd Micromine Africa (Pty) Ltd MineARC South Africa (Pty) Ltd Minerals Council of South Africa Minerals Operations Executive (Pty) Ltd MineRP Holding (Pty) Ltd Mintek MIP Process Technologies (Pty) Limited MLB Investment CC Modular Mining Systems Africa (Pty)Ltd MSA Group (Pty) Ltd Multotec (Pty) Ltd Murray and Roberts Cementation Nalco Africa (Pty) Ltd Namakwa Sands(Pty) Ltd Ncamiso Trading (Pty) Ltd New Concept Mining (Pty) Limited Northam Platinum Ltd - Zondereinde Opermin Operational Excellence Optron (Pty) Ltd Paterson & Cooke Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd Perkinelmer Polysius a Division of Thyssenkrupp Industrial Sol Precious Metals Refiners Ramika Projects (Pty) Ltd Rand Refinery Limited Redpath Mining (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd Rocbolt Technologies Rosond (Pty) Ltd Royal Bafokeng Platinum Roytec Global (Pty) Ltd RungePincockMinarco Limited Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited Salene Mining (Pty) Ltd Sandvik Mining and Construction Delmas (Pty) Ltd Sandvik Mining and Construction RSA (Pty) Ltd SANIRE Schauenburg (Pty) Ltd Sebilo Resources (Pty) Ltd SENET (Pty) Ltd Senmin International (Pty) Ltd Smec South Africa Sound Mining Solution (Pty) Ltd SRK Consulting SA (Pty) Ltd Time Mining and Processing (Pty) Ltd Timrite Pty Ltd Tomra (Pty) Ltd Ukwazi Mining Solutions (Pty) Ltd Umgeni Water Verni Speciality Construction Products (Pty) Ltd Webber Wentzel Weir Minerals Africa Welding Alloys South Africa Worley
5TH YOUNG PROFESSIONALS CONFERENCE A SHOWCASE OF EMERGING RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN THE MINERALS INDUSTRY
17-18 MARCH 2020 THE CANVAS, RIVERSANDS, FOURWAYS 2 CPD POINTS
Innovation and research into mining technology is necessary to position Africa as a world leader in minerals production and beneficiation. The Young Professionals Council is pleased to host a unique, two-day conference that will showcase a broad range of emerging research and innovation from young professionals in the metals and minerals industry. Presentations will focus on new technology, tools and techniques relevant to exploiting Africa’s mineral resources safely, competitively and sustainably.
OBJECTIVES • a broad range of topics covering the entire mining value-chain will give a quick sense of developments in the field of mining and metallurgy • a large body of research at Masters, PhD and Post-doctoral level will give insights into emerging themes and advances in the minerals and metals knowledge-areas • a focus on innovative practices, technological applications and case-studies from mining operations and research institutions will give the practicing professional an opportunity to learn about new tools and techniques relevant to their work • a gathering of diverse professionals within the metals and minerals community will give delegates an opportunity to obtain exposure, build reputations, further their careers and network with peers and leaders in the African Minerals Industry
WHO SHOULD ATTEND This conference should be of value to all professionals across the entire minerals industry value chain, including: • All metallurgical fields • Exploration • Geology • Geotechnical engineering • Leadership/management/government/ community • Mining • Occupational Hygiene and SHE practitioners • ICT experts • Mechanical, electrical/electronic engineers • Mineralogy
EXHIBITION/SPONSORSHIP Sponsorship opportunities are available. Companies wishing to sponsor or exhibit should contact the Conference Co-ordinator.
MINING STUDIES
SMME
CPR’S & OTHER PUBLIC REPORTS
CONTRACT MINING
ONSITE TECHNICA L S ERVICES
SYSTEM INTEGRATION
