BUS 311 Business Law Complete Class To Purchase this Tutorial Copy And Paste Below Link In Your Browser http://www.homework-bank.com/downloads/bus-311-business-law-complete-class/ For Any Information or Any Class Which you Did not find on Our Website , Just Hit US Email On below address Email Address: hworkbank@gmail.com Visit Our Website : http://www.homework-bank.com/
BUS 311 Business Law Complete Class BUS 311 Week 1 DQ 1 Applying the Law to a Set of Facts Applying the Law to a Set of Facts. Read the Hypothetical Case Problem #1 at the end of Chapter 1 and respond to these questions 1. If Javier sued Energy-Auto Inc., identify who would be the plaintiff and the defendant. 2. In which state or states can the suit be brought? 3. Assume that Javier incurred $100,000 in damages. a) Analyze whether the suit can be brought in federal court b) Explain the advantages and disadvantages of federal versus state court for this type of suit. Guided Response: Analyze and respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings. Do you agree with their conclusions? Did the facts you considered important in determining jurisdiction differ from your classmates? Explain why or why not. BUS 311 Week 1 DQ 2 Tort or Crime Tort or Crime. In Chapter 1 of the text you read about the Bailey v. Eminem defamation case where the court held Eminem’s lyrics were protected by the First Amendment. Read the article and view the video (the links are listed under Week 1 Additional Learning Resources Required and Week 1 Multimedia Required) to the Pahler v. Slayer case. Respond to the following questions: 1. Did the Pahler court use the same reasoning as used in Bailey v. Eminem? 2. Should the court’s decision in Pahler be different because a young girl was murdered? 3. Recall the difference between a crime and a tort. Based on these two cases, analyze and discuss whether artists should be held liable for the actions of their fans. BUS 311 Week 1 Quiz BUS 311 Week 2 DQ 1 Elements of a Contract Elements of a Contract. Read the Case Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz in the text. Answer the following questions: 1. What were the terms of the contract between Campbell and the Wentzes? 2. Did the Wentzes perform under the contract? 3. Did the court find specific performance to be an adequate legal remedy in this case? 4. Why did the court refuse to help Campbell in enforcing its legal contract? 5. How could Campbell change its contract in the future so as to avoid the unconstitutionality problem?