Pain, 25 (1986) 165-170 Elsevier
165
PA1 00870
Iontophoresis of Vincristine versus Saline in Post-Herpetic Neuralgia. A Controlled Trial Paul R. Layman *. Eri Argyras ** and Christopher J. Glynn *** *Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford (U.K.), ** Oxfvrd Regional Pain Relief Unit, Abmgdon (U.K.). and Department of Anaesthetics, University of Athens, Athens (Greece). and *** Oxford Regional Pain Relief Unit, A hingdon, and .~uf~eld Department ofAnaesthetics. Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford ( U.K.) (Received
9 July 1985. revised received 30 September
1985, accepted
1 October
198.5)
Twenty patients with post-herpetic neuralgia (median duration 28.5 months) were randomly allocated to receive transdermal iontophoresis of either vincristine or saline. Although significant improvement in pain by word score and visual analogue scale (P = 0.05) was reported by 6 out of 10 of the vincristine group, none of the patients considered themselves ‘cured.’ There was no significant change in the saline group. No adverse haematological or neurological side effects were seen. but skin irritation and painless electrical burns were common in both groups. The dramatic relief of pain in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia of 3 months or less reported elsewhere was not seen in our group who had pain of a longer duration. This present trial does not confirm the value of vincristine iontophoresis in the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia of over 6 months duration.
Introduction
The Periwinkle or vinca alkaloids, vincristine and vinblastine, have been shown in vitro to block axon transport in peripheral nerves at a concentration that will allow nerve conduction to continue [4,8]. Such a highly selective block has not hitherto
Correspondence Derby. U.K.
0304-3959/86/$03.50
to: Dr. P.R. Layman,
Department
0 1986 Elsevier Science Publishers
of Anaesthetics,
Derbyshire
B.V. (Biomedical
Division)
Royal
Infirmary.