OptometryTimes9-10

Page 1

44

InDispensable

SEPTEMBER 2010 / Optometry Times

New opportunities

The case for in-office finishing Optometrists should optimize the entire patient eye-care experience to maintain competitiveness By Steve Swalgen

T

oday’s general economic conditions and individual business owners’ needs to maximize profit models is one underlying rationale for in-office finishing (IOF). Most independent optometrists are seeking a way to grasp fully and use more efficiently the existing equipment and technologies in their offices and may be considering, perhaps for the first time, an IOF lab. The ability of ODs to compete and retain or gain better control over their businesses and financial destinies is no longer an outsource-versus-in-house balancing act. IOF has been a mainstay ainsta for a little more than 50% of optometric tric prac practices across the United ed Sta States for about out 20 years years. However, owe it’s been en mor more common mon in Easte Eastern and Midwestern rn states sta than n Western states states. Som Some of this varia variance nce ha has been directly irectly related to prior policy icy re requi requiring specific pecific tthirddparty payer work k to o be b sent from the optometric practice to a certified or wholly owned wholes wholesale lab for fulll accom accommodation ation of the pre prescription ion job b ((surfacing facing of le lens on throug through finish finished lens prod product). ). In som some cases, ases, polici policies have prevented either independent ODs from considering con consid sideri ng IOF at all all,, o orr practices p prac rac tices that ractic that do do finish fin ish from om upg upgrading rad ing their their exist existing ist ing edgin ed edging ging

Take-Home Message Today’s general economic con conditions and individual business owners’ needs ds to maximiz maxi maximize profit models is one underlying ng rationa rationale le for in-of in-office fice finis finishing (IOF). Optometrists trists need ne to maximize the entiree patie pa patient eye-care re experi experience from om exam th through gh dispen dispensing pensin to mainta maintain ntain via viability.

technology log y to more feature-ric feature-rich h sy systems. ste Vision Se Service rvice Plan (VSP), wit with h5 55 5m million covered lives ivess and a approximatel approximately tely y2 27,0 27,000 7,0 participating g independ independent dependent end ODs, ODs, recent recently began setting what hat is anticipated to be an encour-

aging national direction. The company will be rolling out a new policy that will allow independent ODs to perform IOF for their own VSP-covered work. Because this is a significant policy shift, the business opportunity aspects cannot be underestimated. By way of developing very competitive reimbursement for single-vision jobs, ODs can increase their revenue stream (based on lens material, coatings, and addons) via IOF. The long-standing return-oninvestment (ROI) models for edging onsite are inherently strengthened by this new, and likely to expand (beyond single-vision stock lenses), initiative and policy change. Caveats to this policy exist, however, inclu cluding sourcing ssingle-vision ingle- ion lenses dire directly fro from m a wholl wholly owned wned V VSP lab.. This course urse o of action ma may bee more relat related to aud auditing ng and mai maintaining inin initial nitial distribution stribution needs of the nat national al rol rollout. lout.

Pha Phased-in sed-in in app approach

Figure 2: Santinelli/Nidek LEX-V system with autoblocking ng and drilling. (Photo (Ph provided pr by Santinelli International.) Intern Int ernationa ern onal.) l.)

VSP reports that independent ODs have responde sponded favorably avo ly to the new w policy, and d that intere interest in the “program pilots” lots” ccontinues inues to gro grow. The program am is now being impleple mented in a phased regional approach, with an exp expectation expect ectation ation that that by by early early 2 2011 011 all al l U U.S. .S. inin dependent dep depend endent op optometric tometric tometr ic practi pra practices ctices th that at handle handle VSP patients tients will be able to participate ticipate in this economic game-changing event. The independent OD practice that already edges lenses in-house will have the opportunity to maximize opportunity further and, based on the volume of single-vision lenses, will likely position the practice to upgrade to greater technology or edging tabletop platform for the lab. ODs that have not done IOF before will now be in a position to change their business models and offer a single-day—or less— turnaround opportunity, based on the chosen stock lens inventory for the practice. Edging companies provide various ROI tables for a practice to input their own level of prescription work so a realistic investment versus payoff return for new technology is easily calculable.

User-friendly, feature-rich

Figure 1: Santinelli/Nidek LE-1000-S edger with auto-safety bevel, groove, and polish. (Photo provided by Santinelli International.)

magenta cyan yellow black

Further good news is that edging technology levels for the retail environment are now more user-friendly and feature-rich than ever before. A traditional solid, yet economic, plat-

op0910_044.pgs 09.07.2010 08:33

ADVANSTAR_PDF/X-1a


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
OptometryTimes9-10 by Santinelli International - Issuu