Shannon Fay - Architectural Portfolio 2022 by Shannon Fay Student Architecture Portfolio

S.Fay Professional Work

ARCHITECTURE 1 - 260 EAST BROAD STREET Award Winning - Rochester AIA Mixed-Use, New Build Building Core & Shell 2 - BERGMANN ALBANY OFFICE Commercial Space Planning Revit Modeling PRESERVATION 3 - JOHNSON CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION GUIDELINES Preservation Planning Community Engagement Graphics/Diagramming 4 - PENFIELD CLARK HOUSE RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY Restoration Feasibility Existing Conditions Assessment Laser Scanning & Point Cloud PLANNING 5 - AMSTERDAM FORM BASED CODE/DESIGN GUIDELINES Community Engagement Downtown Revitalization Initiative Graphics/Diagramming 6 - NYS PARKS - NIAGARA RIVER SHORELINE TRAIL SYSTEM Landscape/Park Design Sketchup Renderings Wayfinding VISUALIZATION 7 - RENDERINGS Vestal Fire Station 4 Vestal EMS Facility

1 260 EAST BROAD ST

260 E. BROAD ST ROCHESTER, NY

AWARD WINNING ROCHESTER AIA MIXED USE, NEW BUILD CORE & SHELL REVIT SKETCHUP

OVERVIEW 260 E. Broad St is a 107,000 sf, five-story mixed use building in downtown Rochester. The designers were challenged to create solutions for a mixeduse project that would not only house the workspace for an anchor tenant but also promote their brand and commitment to Rochester. The facility provides retail, dining, and multiple residential units, supporting Rochester’s demand for urban living. It was important to recognize the location of the project being on a main entry road into downtown. The design makes literal and perceived connections to the immediately adjacent urban fabric of downtown as well as to the three-story parking garaged below. The design intentionally celebrates its programmatic elements - the residential units by punctuating the building’s facade with outdoor living spaces, the commercial spaces through expanses of glass and the retail spaces through a design that engages the public realm. The commitment to the creation of spaces for shared uses as well as the design’s flexibility for changing tenant needs in the future differentiates the project from neighboring renovations.

BUILDING PROGRAM: FLOORS 4 & 5 28 residential units (studio, 1- & 2-bedroom) with roof deck on level 4

FLOORS 2 & 3 Commercial workspace for anchor tenant with roof deck on level 2

CHALLENGES

SOLUTIONS

•

High profile site in middle of downtown Rochester

•

Integration into urban fabric via engaging retail level landscaping/hardscaping

•

Below-grade garage existing structural system including existing east/west expansion joint

•

Expansion joint integrated into design of facades; structurally separate “north” and “south” sections of the building

•

Loading area needed in busy urban area

•

Unique detail conditions due to varying exterior cladding materials, fenestration placement, and incorporation of balconies

Interior loading area, enclosed to promote safe walkability for public uninterrupted by truck traffic into loading area

•

Extensive plan and section detailing

•

Apartment space planning

•

Life safety & fire code compliance

Design Iterations for level 4 & 5 residential units to maximize rentable space

•

Extra fire protections and safety precautions on lower levels to comply with residential safety/fire code requirements.

DRAWING SET SAMPLE: https://issuu.com/shannonfayarchportfolio/docs/260_e_broad_st_-_4.16.2020_reduced_set

FLOOR 1 Public lobby, loading dock, retail space, & ground floor anchor tenant space for street-front presence

BELOW GRADE Connection to existing 3-story parking garage below grade Photos by Bergmann: Post-construction

2 BERGMANN ALBANY OFFICE DESIGN 2 WINNERS CIRCLE ALBANY, NY

COMMERCIAL SPACE PLANNING REVIT MODELING

REVIT RENDERINGS

Photos of completed project, featuring Paul & Websly

OVERVIEW Design of a new office space for the Albany location of the architecture & engineering firm Bergmann, now Colliers Engineering & Design. The design was for an empty tenant space within an existing building.

Assisted in the original design iterations for the office layout, created construction documents, & developed renderings.

EP1

S6 S6 S1

SMALL PAPER

S5 S6

TABLE

OCE PLOTTER

36"+ PAPER

PRINTER/ PLOTTER 12

XEROX PRINTER

C12

4' - 1"

T10

WS1

C12

RICOH PRINTER

WS1

EC1

PHONE BOOTH 10

EC1

COLLAB. F5

WS1

EC1

C2 F5

188 SF

C10 C10 C10

F3 3

EC3

C7 C7

EC3

EC2

WAITING

C16

EC2

8' - 0"

WS1

EC1

4' - 0"

EC1

WS1

EC2 EC2

EC2

MED. CONF. RM 3

COLLAB. 4

EC1

WS1

EC1

WS1

Cafeteria/Kitchen

F5 C8

T11a C8

EC1

F3 F3

EC4 ES1

EC4

WS1

EC1

WS1

F5 F5

EC1 WS1

CORRIDOR 2

EC1

WS1

WS1 4' - 6"

T18 C16

WS1

OPEN OFFICE SPACE 5

BRANDING WALL C16

C7 CONF/OFFICE 6

6' - 4"

T18

T12

EC2 EC2

EC4

LOBBY 1

ET1

EC2

C7 C7

150 SF

FROSTED GLASS/ BRANDING

RECEPTION

EC1

ET1

C7 C7

F3 3

ES1 C7

ET1

EC4

ET1

EC3

EC1

PIN UP W ALL

EC3 ET2

EC3

C7 C7

ET1

8' - 0"

OFFICE 7

REF.

ET2

BREAK RM 16

Collaboration Area

C2 F3

T11

F3 3

LARGE CONF. RM 17

C14 C14 C14

F5 COLLAB. SPACE

IT/SERVER F3 8

O4-8

EC3

SURVEY CLOSET 15

5' - 3"

WS1

EC1

WS1 F5

CORRIDOR 9

6' - 0"

STORAGE 14

EC1

WS1

C10 C16 MOTHER'S ROOM 13

EC1 WS1

EC1

C2 WS1 EC1

WS1

C12

EP5

EP4

RECYCLING BINS

HUDDLE/ C12 MATERIALS LIB. 11

EP2 CANON COLOR PLOTTER

4' - 0"

SUPPLIES STORAGE

Concept renderings / Open Office Area

DESIGN FEATURES: • •

FF&E PLAN SCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0"

•

Conference Room 1 adjacent to kitchen to hold large gatherings

•

Collaboration spaces of varying sizes and intimacy levels

•

Circular plan to promote circulation flow

•

Phone booth

•

Material Library - future conversion to conference room

Ample space for additional cubicles

•

Mother’s Room

•

Storage closets

Conference Room 3 - future conversion to office

•

Ceilings open to deck, recessed N strip lighting

FURNITURE IS NOT IN CONTRAC

HISTORIC PRESERVATION GUIDEBOOK

January 2021

JOHNSON CITY

JOHNSON CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION GUIDELINES JOHNSON CITY, NY

PRESERVATION PLANNING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DIAGRAMMING

INDESIGN ILLUSTRATOR

FULL GUIDEBOOK: https://www.gobroomecounty.com/ sites/default/files/dept/ planning/pdfs/VillageJCHistoricGuidebook2021.pdf

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE VILLAGE OF JOHNSON CITY

Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................1 Where Does it Apply? ............................................................................................................................................... 4 What is Historic Preservation? .......................................................................................................................... 8

CHAPTER 2. HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE

Historic Context of the Village .........................................................................................................................20 Significant Architectural Styles ......................................................................................................................26 Building Types ...............................................................................................................................................................29

CHAPTER 3. HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

OVERVIEW The Village of Johnson City, NY was an industrial city with its hay day in the late 1800s, early 1900s. It is known for the Endicott-Johnson Corporation, a shoe factory, headed by George F. Johnson. Johnson believed it was the responsibility of the modern, innovative employer to provide for the welfare of their workers. His progressive labor policies became known as the “Square Deal” for workers. Due to the decline of necessity for manual labor in production the village began to decline in the latter half of the 1900s. Bergmann was approached to create a user-friendly Historic Preservation Guidebook for the Village that highlights the benefits of preservation and best practices for building owners. These guidelines are intended to educate and assist owners with preserving and maintaining the remaining historic structures in the Village. Assisted in existing conditions site reconnaissance, developing the preservation guidelines as well as developing graphics to illustrate the guidebook.

Benefits of Historic Preservation ..................................................................................................................52 Economic Impacts of Historic Preservation .......................................................................................58 Funding Resources .................................................................................................................................................. 60

CHAPTER 4. THE PRINCIPLES OF PRESERVATION

Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties........... 68 Secretary of Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation......................................................................72 Common Preservation Issues in the Village of Johnson City .............................................74

CHAPTER 5. BEST PRACTICES IN PRESERVATION

Strategies for Compatible Modifications ..............................................................................................83 Where to Find Help.................................................................................................................................................130

APPENDIX APPENDIX A. Model Local Regulatory Procedure for Historic Preservation

BUILDING TYPES & STYLES

CHAPTER 2

BUILDING TYPES The Johnson City Historic District consists of a mixture of public, commercial, residential and industrial buildings that contribute to the historic district designation. A majority of the buildings were built between 1888 and 1966. Within these building types are various architectural styles popular during the time of construction as well as vernacular architecture that evolved during the Village’s growth and development. PUBLIC BUILDINGS The Village’s history is reflected in many of the historic district’s public buildings. Public buildings house public services such as churches, schools, government offices and transportation functions such as railroad stations. Many of these public amenities were established by George F. JOHNSON CITY POST OFFICE. Johnson for the good of the workers at 307 MAIN STREET the Endicott-Johnson Corporation as a part of his “Square Deal.” These buildings include the former company firehouse and municipal building (NW corner of Corliss St & Willow St), the former company medical building (NE corner of Corliss Street and Broad Street), and the company recreational hall (117/109 Main Street), the Goodwill Theater (36 Willow Street), two churches (on Main Street at FORMER FIRE HOUSE. 15 AVENUE B the east and west end of the district on prominent corners) and library (107 Main Street). Other buildings were built as part of the public works projects initiated by the federal government during the COMMERCIAL Great Depression like the Johnson VERNACULAR City Post Office (307 Main Street). The While some buildings can be identified as US Post Office, Goodwill Theater and a certain architectural style, or High Style, Your Home Library aremost all listed on the buildings are a mixture of elements National Register of Historic Places. styles mixed with vernacular from traditional architecture.

FORMER RECREATION HALL. 117 MAIN STREET

For early commercial buildings on Main Street in America, the brick-front store was the most popular Guidebook vernacular design for many years 26 Johnson City Historic Preservation which is evident in the west section of Main Street within the Village’s historic district. These buildings are composed of one to three stories and are usually in groups up to a block in length, sharing adjoining- or partywalls. Brick-front characteristics resulted from 250 MAIN STREET. the interaction of elements on the grid that emphasized the façade. Stores were narrow and deep, with single or double windows on the upper floors, panels of brickwork, brick friezes, decorative lintels or sills, and string courses or sections of belt courses that divided the wall laterally. Commercial façades were usually clad with brick as opposed to stone in order to create a more refined appearance. Display space was conventional, whether the entrance was on or off-center. Storefronts spanned the width of the first floor broken up by mullions, sitting on bulkheads and capped with a simple or small cornice on the façade, separating the commercial first floor from the upper stories which often housed offices or residential spaces. The level of transparency differs by floor; the ground floor is very transparent and open to passersby, whereas the upper floors are less transparent in the interest of privacy. Canted bay windows, which were built to allow a large amount light to enter the room, can be found in the district at the western end of Main Street on upper stories.

CONTRIBUTIONS:

All content development (writing & graphics) and formatting for sections:

Building Types

•

Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties

WEST END OF MAIN STREET.

CHAPTER 2

•

Common Preservation Issues

•

Strategies for Compatible Modification

38 Johnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook

CHAPTER 2

EAST END OF MAIN STREET.

B GABLE DORMER

C CHIMNEY

CORNICE A D CORNER BOARD

PARAPET E 6/1B DOUBLE HUNG

C ADJOINING PARTY WALL F VERANDA ACROSS

IN GABLE G CENTERED ENTRANCE

H COLUMNS

E DOUBLE WINDOWS

WINDOWS F BAY WINDOW

DETAILING H OFF-CENTER ENTRANCE

K BULKHEAD

N BRACKET Ornamental or structural/ GAMBREL MANSARD

material stretched on a frame, used to shelter storefront, window, or doorway.

C CHIMNEY

D CORNER BOARD

E 1/1 DOUBLE HUNG

F PORCH ACROSS

G OFF-CENTER, MULTI-

H COLUMNS

I BAY WINDOWS

PANELED FRONT DOOR

WINDOW

FRONT FACADE

J REAR PORCH

ENTRANCE TO ACCESS UPPER FLOORS

L MULLIONS A vertical bar between the panes of glass in a window.

Base of the storefront between the sidewalk and the window.

M AWNING SHED AFLAT sheet of canvas or other

B HIPPED ROOF

A window built to project outward from an outside wall.

K GABLE CLOSED BY

STOREFRONT

A DORMER, HIPPED ROOF

Larger, top of wall and smaller, WINDOW The uppermost part of a A wall between two adjoining FRONT FACADE AND simpler cornice separating wall that extends above the buildings that is shared by and WARPED first floor from upper stories. roof level and provides a integral to both buildings. degree of protection to roof. OFF-CENTER, MULTITWO STORY BAY

EJ WINDOW CENTERED

IDENTIFIABLE FEATURES

A GABLE ROOF

D SINGLE WINDOW

RESIDENTIAL VERNACULAR - AMERICAN FOURSQUARE.

IDENTIFIABLE FEATURES TYPICAL STOREFRONT FEATURES

PANELED FRONT DOOR

RESIDENTIAL VERNACULAR - GABLE ROOF COTTAGE.

IDENTIFIABLE FEATURES

F Johnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook 27

VISUAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN GROUND AND UPPER FLOORS

SOI Standards for Rehabilitation

Within each typology are several architectural styles indicative of the trends at the time of the village’s hay day. There are a handful of examples of high styles represented in the commercial and public/civic buildings. However, most of the buildings in the district are vernacular style residential and industrial buildings, a testament to the contributions of the working class to the village’s history. Descriptions of each typology as well as diagrams detailing significant features of architectural styles are presented to aid in identification of significance for historic buildings.

Significant Architectural Styles

•

Most of the commercial buildings in the Village were constructed in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The commercial district has two distinct textures: the denser west end and the less dense east end. The west section of Main Street (between Arch and Willow Streets) consists of structures with side walls that are often shared with or secured to those of the adjacent structure (e.g., party walls). Side walls that face a street or a yard echo the façade’s composition, while those that face alleys or service walks stand free. Most of this section is made up two- and three-story brick buildings with flat roofs and shallow setbacks from the sidewalk. The east end of Main Street (east of Willow Street) is less dense and consists of one- and two- story buildings separated by side yards, driveways and parking lots with larger setbacks from the public right of way.

ROOF TYPES

•

Within this Historic District several building typologies were identified: Public/Civic, Commercial, Residential & Industrial

COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS

GABLE

supportive element (such as to support a cornice); in this case, frames the facade of the commercial building.

HIP

46 Johnson City Historic Preservation GuidebookJohnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook 39

AMERICAN FOURSQUARE.

Johnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook 47

CHAPTER 3

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION

AFFORDABLE HOUSING The Village of Johnson City as a historic preservation community can address the issue of affordable housing with a policy agenda for older and historic neighborhoods that would include, but not be limited to the following:

Historic preservation has numerous community-based impacts, including the stabilization of property values, neighborhood protection from inappropriate changes to the public realm, and the promotion of civic pride. When investments are made in lower income neighborhoods, neighborhoods are revitalized and become attractive destinations for tourists, new residents and expanded economic activity.

Create more local historic districts to protect valuable cultural resources and preserve a rapidly vanishing inventory of affordable housing

2. Inaugurate a fast-track system for the acquisition and redevelopment of vacant, abandoned, and tax-foreclosed properties

The Village of Johnson City and the Town of Union Economic Development Department, which provides financial assistance to start-up and expanding businesses through the Local Development Corporation, has focused on the revitalization of the downtown core through incentive programs.

3. Give priority to older and historic neighborhoods for infrastructure improvements, police attention, recreation and park facilities, and especially schools

The Town of Union Business Assistance (TUBA) Program, Central Business District (CBD) Program, Commercial Facade Program, Emerging Enterprise/Emerging Market Entrepreneurial (E³), Microenterprise Program, Section 108 Program and Site Preparation Program Funding are several of the loan programs offered through the Local Development Corporation of the Town of Union. This assistance helps keep historic main streets and downtowns economically viable.

See the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s Historic Preservation and Affordable Housing: The Missed Connection for more information about how the revitalization of historic urban neighborhoods can improve the quality of life among disadvantaged households due to the prevalence of transportation options, walkability, and quick access to resources inherently present in historic urban neighborhoods.

56 Johnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook

SUCCESS STORIES The design team collaborated with building owners to find local success stories for rehabilitation. These owners provided their input as far as the preservation process and their projects are featured as positive examples in the guidebook (above), along with examples from other historic districts around the country (right).

SECRETARY OF INTERIOR’S STANDARDS

CASE STUDY: ADAPTIVE REUSE CENTURY SUNRISE The Apartments at Century Sunrise is located in the former EndicottJohnson Corporation’s Sunrise Group, which consists of the Sunrise Building (1929) and the South End Factory (1918). Both industrial buildings are clustered along the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western rail lines between Baldwin and Willow Streets in the location where the first industrial expansion took place in the Village. The buildings are contributing properties to the Johnson City National Register Historic District. They feature brick curtain walls and large, metal sash industrial windows with a flat roof. The five- and four-story buildings feature a central corridor, which was essential in the rehabilitation, with stair towers at each comer. A skyway at the third story used to connect the Sunrise Building with the Endicott-Johnson Jigger Factory (1926), a four-story brick industrial building located across the railroad tracks to the north. This building was demolished in February 2012 and is now used as a parking lot for Binghamton University’s School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. This mixed-use adaptive reuse project is the first project in the Johnson City iDistrict to provide modern housing within walking distance to Binghamton University’s Health Sciences Campus, which is the district’s economic driver and anchor institution. This new satellite campus consists of the School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Decker College of Nursing and Health Sciences.

Once the building’s style is identified the proper treatment can be selected, whether that be preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, or reconstruction. Since the most common treatment will most likely be rehabilitation the Standards of Rehabilitation are then explained and diagrammed. References are made to corresponding Preservation Briefs by the National Trust for Historic Preservation and where they can be found online for further information about specific issues. Other tips and tricks are highlighted in sidebars throughout the guidebook.

Century Sunrise features 105 apartments, some of which are affordable units, and 7,500 square feet of commercial space. The 33-million-dollar project was undertaken by Regan Development Corporation and utilized a mixture of financial incentives, including grant funding from Round 6 of the REDC’s URI, the Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery, Office for People With Developmental Disabilities (OPWDD) and the New York State Homes and Community Renewal (HCR) Homes for Working Families Program, as well as equity investment though the Federal/State Low Income Housing and Historic Preservation Tax Credit Programs. This project serves as a great example for how to leverage multiple funding sources successfully.

CHAPTER 5

Johnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook 57

Paint Color Paint analysis can reveal the storefront’s historic paint colors and may be worth undertaking if a careful restoration is desired. If not, the paint color should be, at a minimum, appropriate to the style and setting of the building. This means that if the building is located in a historic district, the color selection should complement not only the building but surrounding neighborhood. In general, color schemes for wall and major decorative trim or details should be kept simple; in most cases the color or colors chosen for a storefront should be used on other painted exterior detailing (windows, shutter, cornice, etc.) to unify upper and lower portions of the façade. Windows Glass windows are generally the most prominent features in historic storefronts, and care should be taken to ensure that they are properly maintained. Transparency of the first floor should be greater than that of the upper floors. First floor transparency allows for enhanced customer interaction between the street and the interior of the commercial space. Upper story transparencies maintain light into the residential or office spaces while also affording a level of privacy. Replacing windows with ones that do not reflect the original shape of the opening, especially if they are smaller, are not historically appropriate as they do not reflect the character of the building and reduce the amount of transparency of the façade. Garage Doors/Moveable Transparent Walls Transparency can also be incorporated into storefronts in more creative ways. Some adaptive reuse projects can utilize new storefront design for doors, transoms and display areas. For example, a storefront that has been so severely modified or altered that it no longer retains historic integrity can incorporate overhead doors within the new façade design in order to allow for visibility into and out of the store.

104 Johnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook

CLOSED

PAINT COLOR The paint color for this store front is not appropriate for the historic district. The rest of the district is filled with muted colors as well as natural earth tones. Additionally, the lack of transparency on the ground floor is inappropriate for the district. This is clearly not the original storefront and should be replaced with a more historically compatible one.

WINDOWS This is a good example of transparency in a historic commercial building. The first floor has full length windows that connect the store to the street. The upper floors have smaller windows which provide privacy to the residences or offices. The windows clearly fit in the openings in the facade indicating that they are the original windows or historically accurate replacements.

GARAGE DOORS This building is one of Denver’s first fire stations from the 1880s and therefore has historical significance to the city. However, it was no longer being used as a fire station and was deteriorating. The building underwent a full-scale restoration and reopened as a restaurant called Woodie Fisher, a seasonal and approachable eatery at the Hilton Garden Inn. The restoration entailed stabilizing the structure and preserving the arched windows, and maintaining the garage door openings.

OPEN

Johnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook 105

CHAPTER 5

The content from this guidebook was delivered to the town in PDF format as well as incorporated into an interactive website for all users to readily access. These resources are located at the following links:

MASONRY / STONE

Masonry and stone is found most often as exterior walls of public and commercial buildings as well as in architectural details. The term “masonry” includes all types of natural stone, brick, terra cotta and adobe, as well as concrete and other cementitious materials. Common conditions or issues to look for include spalling or crumbling mortar, which is often caused by ground moisture, leaking downspouts or natural freeze/thaw cycles. Additionally, masonry and stone are often covered with stucco, mastic or paint or show stains or graffiti.

TREATMENT

METHODOLOGY •

It is important to remember that many mid-nineteenth century brick buildings were painted immediately or soon after construction to protect poor quality brick or to imitate stone. Some historic masonry buildings not originally painted were painted at a later date to hide alterations or repairs, or to solve recurring maintenance or moisture problems. Thus, whether for reasons of historical tradition or practicality, it may be preferable to retain existing paint. TREATMENT •

CLEAN

Repointing - If mortar is missing, repoint using mortar of the same composition, color, texture, and hardness, as well as the joint size and profile of the original. If the mortar is harder than that stone/masonry around it then the stone/masonry will deteriorate faster.

•

DO NOT SAND BLAST or BLAST CLEAN. This leaves the masonry porous and more susceptible to water infiltration and damage, especially during freeze/thaw cycles. Historic masonry should be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove graffiti and stains using the gentlest means possible, such as water and a mild detergent using natural bristle brushes, and/or a nonharmful chemical solution, both followed by a low-pressure water rinse. If new paint cannot be removed without using abrasive methods, it is best to leave the masonry painted. Repainting in a compatible color may help visually, however.

Guidebook PDF: https://www.gobroomecounty.com/sites/default/files/dept/planning/ pdfs/VillageJCHistoricGuidebook2021.pdf

MISSING MORTAR UNTREATED

METHODOLOGY •

REPAIR

Similar guidelines apply to mastic. Its removal by mechanical means may result in abrading the masonry, and chemical and heat methods may prove ineffective—although solvents like acetone will aid in softening the hardened mastic. If the mastic has become brittle, a flat chisel may be used to pop it off. This technique, if not undertaken with care, may result in damaging the masonry. If complete removal is not possible, the mastic may have permanently stained the masonry. These damaged or stained masonry pieces can be replaced in-kind but replacement with an exact match is challenging. It is advised to paint over the masonry damage to maintain a uniform appearance.

DELIVERABLES

ADJACENT BUILDING AFTER REPOINTING

Online Interactive Guidebook: https://www.jcpreserves.com/

Spalling - Spalling is the erosion or breaking off of small pieces of brick or stone. Deteriorated stone may be replaced in-kind, or with a matching substitute material. In some cases where not visually prominent, the area may be covered with stucco and possibly scored to resemble blocks of stone. Replacement of a large area with new materials may not be acceptable as it may give the building an appearance that is inappropriate to the visual character of a building.

CHAPTER 5

TREATMENT

94 Johnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook

COMMON PRESERVATION ISSUES Common preservation issues prevalent within the Village are highlighted as well as possible solutions for said issues to give building owners a place to start with regard to rehabilitation. The most common issues within the Village are demolition by neglect, deferred maintenance, and inappropriate rehabilitation strategies. Windows boarded up, inappropriate signage, masonry spalling, covering original materials in more modern ones, and buildings abandoned altogether are prevalent among the Village’s building stock.

METHODOLOGY •

EVIDENCE OF BRICK Wood can be painted withSPALLING. sand-impregnated paint to imitate cut ashlar stone.

•

ScoringJohnson stucco into patterns was fairlyGuidebook common in colonial America 95 Cityblock Historic Preservation to imitate stone. This can be used to replace the look of natural stone.

•

Terra-cotta, a molded fired clay product, was itself a substitute material and was very popular in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It simulated the appearance of intricately carved stonework, which was expensive and time-consuming to produce. Terra cotta could be glazed to imitate a variety of natural stones, from brownstones to limestones, or could be colored for a polychrome effect.

REPLACE •

Dry-tamp cast stone or textured precast concrete may be a suitable substitute if care is taken to ensure that the detail, color and texture of the original stone are matched. It is used both for surface wall stones and for ornamental features such as window and door surrounds, voussoirs, brackets and hoods.

•

Cementitious patching can be used for sandstone repairs.

•

Plastic stone can be used for masonry repairs.

Refer to Preservation Brief 8: Aluminum and Vinyl Siding on Historic Buildings - The Appropriateness of Substitute Materials for Resurfacing Historic Wood Frame Buildings and Preservation Brief 16: The Use of Substitute Materials on Historic Building Exteriors for more information.

An example of how matching historic stone color and texture can be a challenge. Using substitute materials can be preferable due to its greater control of texture and color. Image Source: NPS Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation

STAMPED METAL PANEL

The stamped metal facade faces a parking lot. It can be assumed that there used to be a building here that was demolished. The building owner chose to use stamped, painted metal to represent the brick that would typically be on the exterior facade of a building of this style. The condition of the metal panels in this example is deteriorated and in need of refurbishment (see rippling and upturned corners of the paneling). However, if not maintained properly this can be an acceptable substitution for the expensive brick facade. The metal paneling is easier to clean, easier to replace & less cost prohibitive than brick. The condition of the wall beneath the paneling is unknown based on this photograph. Before using a solution like stamped metal paneling to replace masonry, the original facade should be evaluated for structural integrity as well as for any problems such as water damage/infiltration. These problems could be hidden by the metal paneling causing significant damage in the future and more costly repairs.

APPROPRIATE REPAIR In left image, the cornice and its stone detailing is deteriorating so instead of replacing the whole cornice with replacement stone of the same kind which may be hard to find, cast stone was used to imitate the historic stone in the right image.

STRATEGIES FOR COMPATIBLE MODIFICATION Proper rehabilitation strategies are thoroughly diagrammed and explained as well as where to find further information and/or professionals to contact for consultations or advice. This section also details how a building owner may approach the Village historic review committee to receive approval and/or funding for their rehabilitation projects.

INAPPROPRIATE REPAIR

96 Johnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook

source: Truliance Consulting

Johnson City Historic Preservation Guidebook 97

4 CLARK HOUSE RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY

RESTORATION LASER SCAN MODEL EXISTING CONDITIONS

CINTOO REVIT ILLUSTRATOR

OVERVIEW

Bergmann was hired to assess existing conditions of Clark House, a local historic landmark, with the ultimate goal of comparing renovation of the existing building against the options for demolishing the Clark House and constructing a replica, with the intent to accommodate a future tenant.

Park Trails

TOWN OF PENFIELD

BRIEF HISTORY:

CLARK HOUSE REHABILITATION

The Clark House at 600 Whalen Road in Penfield, NY, was constructed as a single-family residence in 1832, a two-story wood-framed Federal Style house of approximately 770 sf with 300 sf of covered porches. The house was remodeled and expanded several times. In the late 1920’s, the house was sold to the Dolomite Corporation, which founded the Shadow Pines Golf Club, and the house was converted into the clubhouse/restaurant and pro shop. Several additions were built over crawl spaces. A pole barn was constructed adjacent to the Clark House, intended to house the gold carts and grounds maintenance equipment. Though not conditioned the cart barn was designed in a similar style to the Clark House. The current footprint of the Clark House is approximately 6,400 sf and the cart barn is approximately 2,500 sf. It is understood that Clark House has long been listed on New York’s Historic Building Survey and was designated a Local Historic Landmark by the Town of Penfield in 2018.

PROJECT UPDATE 12.8.2021

The golf course was closed in 2016 and the Clark House restaurant closed at the same time. In 2018 the site and building were purchased by the Town of Penfield, with the intent to rehabilitate to accommodate a new restaurant-type tenant.

W h a le n R o a d

600 WHALEN RD PENFIELD, NY

Cart Barn

Clark House

Clark Road

PROCESS • • • • • • •

Laser scanning Visual inspection/photos Revit modeling Initial Town Board presentation Selective demolition investigation Cost estimations Town Board presentation

Revit model first floor plan with point cloud overlay

Cintoo, point cloud viewing software, 3D view

SURVEY & 3D LASER SCAN

09/08/21

Project Name TOWN OF PENFIELD CLARK REHABILITATION Project HOUSE Location

ARCH D 24x36

280 East Broad Street Suite 200 Rochester, NY 14604 www.bergmannpc.com

TOWN OF PENFIELD CLARK HOUSE REHAB

2ND FLOOR 9' - 0"

600 Whalen Rd. Penfield, NY 14526

Date Revised

1ST FLOOR 0"

Description

SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS: • Exterior material deterioration at grade • Wood porches deteriorating • West portico bowing • Roof not draining properly • Significant water damage in basements • Interior floors sloping • Water damage in bathroom ceiling • Bay window needs structural reinforcing • Window sill damage • Rusted basement columns

EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0"

2ND FLOOR 9' - 0"

Key Plan

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ____% SUBMISSION

Project Manager

Designer

Reviewer

Date Issued

Project Number

7/16/2021

015334.00

Sheet Name

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CLARK HOUSE

EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0"

Drawing Number

A202

GENERAL NOTES

ARCH D 24x36

REFER TO A002 FOR WALL TYPES, DETAILS, AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

REFER TO A120 SERIES DRAWINGS FOR REFLECTED CEILING PLANS AND DETAILS.

REFER TO A140 SERIES DRAWINGS FOR FINISH PLANS, SCHEDULES, AND DETAILS.

REFER TO A160 SERIES DRAWINGS FOR FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT PLANS AND SCHEDULES.

REFER TO A600 SERIES DRAWINGS FOR DOOR SCHEDULE, WINDOW SCHEDULE, DETAILS, AND BASIS OF DESIGN.

ALL DOORS TO BE LOCATED 4" FROM DRYWALL ADJACENT WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

ALIGN FACES OF MASONRY AND STUD WALLS INDICATED IN THE SAME PLANE ON PLANS, U.O.N.

KEYNOTES

280 East Broad Street Suite 200 Rochester, NY 14604 www.bergmannpc.com

TOWN OF PENFIELD

BUILT IN CABINETS

CLARK HOUSE REHAB

11a

600 Whalen Rd. Penfield, NY 14526

Date Revised

12 2

INVESTIGATION - WEST ELEVATION A202

Description

11b

A202

12/08/21

FIRE

PLACE

TOWN OF PENFIELD CLARK HOUSE REHABILITATION A

Key Plan

Slides from presentation to Town Board showing areas of issue 7/22/2021 10:48:28 AM

7/22/2021 9:55:25 AM

Discipline Lead

S KUSHNER

1ST FLOOR 0"

FIR

PL AC

FIRE PLACE

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ____% SUBMISSION

Project Manager

Discipline Lead

S KUSHNER

Designer

Reviewer

Date Issued

Project Number

7/16/2021

015334.00

Sheet Name

21 1

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

FIRST FLOOR PLAN - CLARK HOUSE Drawing Number

A101.1

A201

SCALE : 3/16" = 1'-0"

INVESTIGATION - FIRST FLOOR

25 12/08/21

TOWN OF PENFIELD CLARK HOUSE REHABILITATION

New Foundation

1983 Portion Rehab

New Foundation New Foundation

1983 Portion Rehab 1983 Portion Rehab

1939 Portion Rehab 1939 Portion Rehab

Option 1: Rehabilitation of the building as it exists, including: Option 1: Rehabilitation of the building as it exists, including: • Excavation and waterproofing of the foundation •• Excavation and waterproofing the foundation New foundation under the bayofwindow in the former pro shop •• New foundation under the bay window the former pro shop Replacement of deteriorated framing at in the base, walls, and soffit •• Replacement of exterior deteriorated framing at the walls, andwith soffit Removal of the clapboard siding andbase, replacement Hardi-plank •• Removal siding and replacement with Hardi-plank Removal of of the the exterior windowsclapboard and replacement with new •• Removal of the windows and replacement with new Roof replacement •• Roof replacement Gutting of the interior New Foundation • Gutting of the interior 1983 Portion Rehab 1939 Portion Rehab 1832 Portion Rehab

1832 Portion Rehab 1832 Portion Rehab

Option 1: Rehabilitation of the building as it exists, including:

• Excavation and waterproofing of the foundation • New foundation under the bay window in the former pro shop • Replacement of deteriorated framing at the base, walls, and soffit • Removal of the exterior clapboard siding and replacement with Hardi-plank • Removal of the windows and replacement with new • Roof replacement • Gutting of the interior COST ESTIMATE: COST ESTIMATE: Approximately $2,260,000 Approximately $2,260,000 New Basement *DETAILED ESTIMATE ON SLIDE 17 *DETAILED ESTIMATE ON SLIDE 17

Demolished

Option 1: Rehabilitation of the building as it exists, including: • • • • • • •

Excavation and waterproofing of the foundation New foundation under the bay window in the former pro shop Replacement of deteriorated framing at the base, walls, and soffit Removal of the exterior clapboard siding and replacement with Hardi-plank Removal of the windows and replacement with new Roof replacement Gutting of the interior

1939 Portion Rehab

TOWN OF PENFIELD

REHABILITATION - OPTI TheSTRATEGIES 1939 Replica

12/08/21 14entire REHABILITATION STRATEGIES - OPTION 1 2: Demolish Option building, including foundation. TOWN OF PENFIELD 12/08/21 14 CLARK HOUSE REHABILITATION REHABILITATION STRATEGIES - OPTION 1New Basement CLARK HOUSE REHABILITATION

Then:

A. • Build the shell of the two older portions of the building to appear the same existing The as 1939 Replica The 1832 Replica Demolished Approximately $2,260,000 New Basement • Except with a new basement to match the footprint New Basement *DETAILED ESTIMATE ON SLIDE 17 • Interior Option 2: Demolish entire building, including foundation. Then: would not include the second floor, only the ground floor space with 2-story vaultedReplica ceiling framing The 1939 Replica The 1832 Demolished A. TOWN OF PENFIELD • All interior to be omitted from the scope of work The 1939 Replica The finishes 1832 Replica Demolished 12/08/21 14 REHABILITATION STRATEGIES OPTION 1 • Build the shell of the two older of the building to appear the CLARKportions HOUSE REHABILITATION Option 2: Demolish entire building, including foundation. Then: OR same including as existingfoundation. Then: Option 2: Demolish entire building, • Except with a new basement to match the footprint A. B. COST ESTIMATE: A. • Interior would includetothe second floorversion space “A” • Build the shell of the two older portions of thenot building appear thefloor, only the ground • Build Newtwo Basement • Build shell of the olderwith portions of the building to framing appear the 2-story vaulted ceiling same the as existing • Include second floor of appropriate size and access per code 2A: existing interior to be omitted from the scope of work • same Exceptaswith a new basement•toAll match thefinishes footprint Approximately $1,500,000 COST ESTIMATE: a new to match the footprint The 1939 Replica The 1832 Replica Demolished•• Except Interiorwith would not basement include the COST ESTIMATE: ORsecond floor, only the ground floor space REHABILITATION STRATEGIES - OPTION • Interior would not include the second floor, only the ground floor space with 2-story vaulted ceiling framing 1983 Existing Foundation Option 2: Demolish entire building, including foundation. Then: 2B: 2A: B. with 2-story vaulted ceiling framing 1983 Existing Foundation • All interior finishes to be omitted from the scope of work 2A: Approximately $1,625,000 A. Approximately $1,500,000 •Foundation Build version “A” of work •portions All interior finishes to be omitted from the scope 1983 Existing New Basement *DETAILED ESTIMATE ON SLIDE 17 • Build the shell of the two older OR of the building to appear the Approximately $1,500,000 • Include second floor of appropriate size and access per code New Basement same as existing The 1983 Replica The 1939 Replica OR 2B: • Except with a new basement toB. match the footprint Thefloor 1983 Replica COST ESTIMATE: The 1939 Replica The$1,625,000 1832 Replica 2B: • Interior would not include the second floor, only the ground space Approximately TOWN OF PENFIELD B. The 1939 REHABILITATION Replica • Build version “A”The 1983 Replica 12/08/21 The$1,625,000 1832 Replica STRATEGIES - OPTION 2A & 2B *DETAILED ESTIMATE ON SLIDE15 17 with 2-story vaulted ceiling framing Approximately CLARK HOUSE REHABILITATION •• from Build “A”floor of appropriate size2A: Include second and access per code • All interior finishes to be omitted theversion scope of work *DETAILED ESTIMATE ON SLIDE 17 Approximately $1,500,000 • Include second floor of appropriate size and access per code OR Option 3: Demolish and replace entire building in kind TOWN OF PENFIELD 2B: B. 15 TOWN OF PENFIELD Option 3: Demolish and replace entireApproximately building in kind STRATEGIES - OPTION 2A & 2B 12/08/21 REHABILITATION $1,625,000 CLARK HOUSE REHABILITATION • Build version “A” Demolish the entire the foundations in the newer portion 15 building, retaining *DETAILED ESTIMATE ON SLIDE 17 REHABILITATION - OPTION 2A• & 2B 12/08/21 Option 3: Demolish and replace entire building in kind STRATEGIES • Include second floor of appropriate and access perentire code building, retaining the foundations in the newer portion • size Demolish the CLARK HOUSE REHABILITATION • Build new to replace the entire building in kind with a new basement in the Demolish entire building, foundations in the portion • Build new the to replace the entireretaining buildingthe in kind with a new basement in the TOWN OFnewer PENFIELD front and updated crawl space (or connecting corridor in the basement level 12/08/21 REHABILITATION STRATEGIES - OPTION 2A &in2Bkindcorridor • Build new updated to replace the space entire building with 15 a new basement in level the front and crawl (or connecting inCLARK the basement HOUSE REHABILITATION • All interior finishes to be omitted from the scope of work front and updated (orfrom connecting corridor in the basement level • All interior finishes crawl to be space omitted the scope of work COST ESTIMATE: • All interior finishes to be omitted from the scope of work COST ESTIMATE: 1983 Existing Foundation Approximately $2,900,000 New Basement Approximately $2,900,000 *DETAILED ESTIMATE ON SLIDE 17 The 1983 Replica The 1939 Replica The 1832 Replica COST ESTIMATE:

*DETAILED ESTIMATE ON SLIDE 17

Option 3: Demolish and replace entire building in kind

• Demolish the entire building, retaining the foundations in the newer portion

REHABILITATION STRATEGIES - OPTION 3 REHABILITATION STRATEGIES - OPTION 3

12/08/21 12/08/21

16 16

TOWN OF PENFIELD REHABILITATION STRATEGIES - OPTIO TOWN OF PENFIELD CLARK HOUSE REHABILITATION

CI T Y OF AMSTE RD A M, N Y • FO R M -BAS E D C OD E OVERVIEW

and streamline permitting and approval processes of future development in downtown Amsterdam by regulating the physical form of the built environment.

The regulations are broken down into building design/form such as facade transparency ratios, sign regulations such as placement and size, and site regulations such as set backs and rights of way. The regulations that apply to all areas of the DRI area make up Section 4. Any regulations that require more specification or are specific to a subarea are included in Sections 6, 7 & 8.

Assisted the lead planner by attending stakeholder meetings, facilitating public engagement/feedback, editing text/format, and developing graphics to improve understanding of the document by all parties.

This Form-Based Code builds upon the vision established in the City of Amsterdam’s Downtown Revitalization Initiative (DRI) Strategic and Investment Plan to establish a cohesive welcoming downtown environment. The code will improve physical character and aesthetics of the downtown, promote walkability and multi-modal access, protect historic resources,

SECTION 1

FBC CONTENT

AMSTERDAM FORM BASED CODE/DESIGN GUIDELINES

Section 1: Introduction

Section 2: Administration & Enforcement Section 3: Definitions And Measurements

Section 4: Regulations Applicable To All Areas

DOWNTOWN AMSTERDAM, NY

SECTION 1

C I TY O F A MSTE R D AM , NY • F ORM- B A S ED C OD E

Section

Section 6: North Amsterdam Subarea Regulations

5: Public Space Regulations

Section 7: South Amsterdam Subarea Regulations

Appendix A: Historic Context

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION DIAGRAMMING

INDESIGN ILLUSTRATOR

FORM-BASED CODE DISTRICT & SUBAREA BOUNDARIES

Form-Based Code District North Amsterdam Subarea

Waterfront Subarea

South Amsterdam Subarea

Section 8: Waterfront Subarea Regulations

SECTION 6

CITY O F AMST ER D AM, N Y • F O RM - B ASE D C O D E

6.2.

101

BUILDINGS

TRANSPARENCY ALONG PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STREETS (min.) Ground Floor

75%

Upper and Top Floors

25%

This section establishes building height, setback, transparency, and facade material and color requirements for all structures within the North Amsterdam Subarea.

BUILDING HEIGHT

UPPER FLOOR, 25% MIN. TRANSPARENCY calculated based on total facade area between surface of a given floor and the surface of the floor above B max. (10’)

GROUND FLOOR, 75% MIN. TRANSPARENCY calculated based on total facade area between 2 and 10 feet above the sidewalk or ground surface

B min. (0’)

CO ST N RE DA ET RY

REAR

OR ERI

E IN

SID

TOP FLOOR, 25% MIN. TRANSPARENCY calculated based on total facade area between surface of the top floor and top of the wall (not including parapets or other architectural projections)

C I (10’) TY A max.

PRIM

ARY

facade area used to calculate transparency

4 58CO D ESECTION SECTION 4C IT Y O OF AM ST ER D AM , NY • F O RM- BA S E D 59F A M ST E R D A M , N Y • F O R M - B AS E D C O D E

A min. (0’)

STRE

permitted height encroachments

transparent portions of the building

build-to-zone

property line

4.1.8. BUILDING-MOUNTED LIGHTING

BUILDING HEIGHT

4.1.7. AWNINGS

DIMENSIONAL & SITING REQUIREMENTS

BUILDING SETBACKS (min. / max.)

1. Building-mounted lighting shall complement the

Maximum

80’

architectural character of0’the principal building Street / 10’ A Primary

Minimum

25’

B Secondary Street

and the defined character of the Subarea in which its located. 0’ / 10’

2. Breaks in awnings shall coincide with breaks in facade openings.

2. Building-mounted lighting intended to illuminate

3. Awning construction and shape shall reflect the opening over which it is installed. B

0’ / no max. building entrances, utility and loading areas, and C Side Interior public and private right-of ways shall be fully

PERMITTED HEIGHT ENCROACHMENTS (max.) Chimney, flue, vent Elevator/stairway access to roof

12’

Mechanical Equipment

6’

Parapet Wall

4’

Vegetation on Green Roof

no max.

This requirement does not apply to buildingmounted lighting installed for the sole purpose of highlighting architectural details.

5. Awning materials shall be heavy-duty canvas or fabric. High-gloss or plasticized fabrics are prohibited.

LOT FRONTAGE (min.)

3. Building-mounted lighting shall reinforce, not replace, pole-mounted lighting along public and private right-of-ways and in parking lots. Primary Street 75% 4. Building-mounted lighting shall emit a light Secondary Street 50% of constant intensity and color and meet the required illumination levels specified in Table 4.1.1.

4. The color and pattern of an awning must be compatible with the style of the building to which A it is attached.

trespass and glare. 0’ / light no max. D Rear shielded and minimize

5’

AWNING DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS

1. Awnings shall be continuous above building entrances, doors, windows, or outdoor service areas.

A C

6. Awnings shall be self-supporting and shall not have any poles encroaching on the public rightof-way.

A HEIGHT:

7. Operable awnings aregrade permitted. Between 8 and 15 feet above when illuminating entrances, utility and loading areas, and 8. Awnings shall be lit from above with light fixtures rights-of-way

CLEAR HEIGHT ABOVE SIDEWALK (MIN.): 8 feet

DEPTH (MAX.): 6 feet

SETBACK FROM CURBLINE (MIN.): 2 feet

that comply with the Building-Mounted lighting

requirements in Section 4.1.8. SITING: Lighting shall be sited in to improve safety and 9. Backlighting orentrances internal and illumination security at all building utility and of awnings is areas. prohibited. loading 10. Text and/or graphics on awnings shall comply with Awning Sign requirements specified in Section 4.2.3.

TABLE 4.1.1.

REQUIRED ILLUMINATION LEVELS FOR

11. All applicants must provide an indemnity agreement, in a form acceptable to the City, holding harmless and indemnifying the City, its officers and employees, from and against BUILDING ENTRANCES any and all claims and liability resulting from

D VALENCE HEIGHT (MAX.): 8 inches

6 PLANNING/ LANDSCAPE design RENDERINGS VARIOUS LOCATIONS

LANDSCAPE DESIGN RENDERINGS WAYFINDING

SKETCHUP PHOTOSHOP ILLUSTRATOR

OVERVIEW This project proposed a trail system in Western New York connecting various small towns and cities to each other as well as to local ecological areas and parks. Gateways and trailheads contain wayfinding with information about the environment and trail system as well as amenities such as benches, bike racks, and garbage receptacles. Developed renderings of proposed streetscape upgrades, trail system gateways, parklets, and trails.

Streetscape Along Route 18F

Falkner Park - Proposed Gateway (just south of Fort Niagara State Park on map to left)

Fourmile Creek State Park Entrance Intersection

Fourmile Creek State Park - Proposed Gateway

7 VISUALIZATION PROJECTS FOR WHICH THE EXTENT OF ROLE WAS

VISUALIZATION/ RENDERINGS

VESTAL FIRE STATION 4 The town of Vestal contracted Bergmann to design a facility to replace the existing Fire Station 4. The new station design has three distinct program areas: the 5-bay apparatus bay, the entry/radio room, and the administration area which includes offices, locker room, a kitchen and rec area, large training room, small conference room, and a decontamination area. These three programs were translated into masses with the radio room prominent and central to the design. The aesthetic of the facility combines the traditional look of a fire station with more modern materials and detailing. The black & white image below is a concept sketch for the design, followed by the final proposal rendering presented to the town for approval. Programs used: •

Revit

•

Enscape

•

Photoshop

VESTAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES The town of Vestal retained Bergmann to design an EMS facility. The building is approximately 11,000 sf and includes 5 vehicle apparatus bays, office space, training areas, and a residential area for staff who temporarily live at the facility. This project was commissioned in 2018 and was completed in the summer of 2021. An exterior view rendering is shown above. To the left is an interior rendering of the day room/kitchen. Programs used: •

Revit

•

3DS Max

•

Photoshop