SITE ANALYSIS CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS TERMINOLOGY
DEFINATION
SURVEILLANCE
Children generally tend to feel much safe and secured when they familiar people around who keep a eye on them. This type of surveillance is known as natural/ public surveillance.
TERRITORIALITY
MOBILITY URBAN FORM ANALYSIS
OPEN SPACES
NETWORK
ACTIVITY ZONES
Maximum on street opening of windows
Cluster plan with inward looking open space
Common road for children with housing facing street provides more eyes
High activity nodes tends to gather more people which is not preferred by children.
Limited access to the surrounding urban environment reduces their reach.
Access to the surrounding urban environment enhances their movement.
Safe movement along the main street for children helps in traveling alone within the precinct
Active nodes within the area leads to formation of safe environment for children
The territoriality of children is directly linked with their public spaces of interaction, tends to set their territory.
50 M 100 M
200 M 500 M 750 M
PERMEABILITY
50 M
PERMEABILITY for children can be achieved by providing interactive spaces. Lack of permeability may lead to decline of curiosity and dead end routes which may cause bewilderment
100 M
CHILDREN MOVEMENT AND RANGE
200 M 500 M 750 M
Permeability within built form allows children to interact with the built form.
LEGIBILITY
Permeability within built form allows children to interact with the built form.
Permeability from the primary network to secondary leads to formation of inactive spaces.
Formation of inactive spaces lead to anti-social activities which inuence children.
Edge condition of open spaces doesn’t favor children activties.
No distinct character to built form and narrow lanes turn into dumping yard.
Narrow lanes create enclosure and also fear among children.
OPEN SPACE
LEGIBILITY is how children interact with both physical form and their activity. With high enclosure, no clear node and path develops fear within children cause the space to be unsafe for them.
No clear roadway and blurred edges due to onstreet parking
MAPPING OF SAFE AND UNSAFE AREAS CHOSEN BY CHILDREN SURVEILLANCE
TERRITORIALITY
PERMEABILITY
LEGIBILITY
ROUTE TAKEN BY CHILDREN TO SCHOOL
HOME
CHILDREN PREFERRED OPEN SPACE HIGHLY UNSAFE ASSEMBELING FOR SCHOOL
WALKING TOWARDS TO SCHOOL
DENSITY
JUNCTION CROSSING OPEN SPACE
UNSAFE
WELL
NALLAH CROSSING
SAFE URBAN FORM
OPEN SPACE
NETWORK ACTIVE & INACTIVE ZONES
SCHOOL
PREFERABLE SPOT FOR CHILDREN (AGE OF 5-17 YEAR)