Signal Tribune
This Long Beach ceramic artist made her mark in the city one tiny pot at a time
Your Weekly Community Newspaper
VOL. XLIV NO. 6 HOUSING
Emma DiMaggio | Signal Tribune
Long Beach looks to make more space for tiny homes, assist those experiencing homelessness
see page 4
Serving Bixby Knolls, California Heights, Los Cerritos, Wrigley and Signal Hill
SIGNAL HILL
HOUSING
PLAN FOR CANNABIS VOTE GOES UP IN SMOKE
Emma DiMaggio Managing d E itor
Thanks to Long Beach Recovery Act funds, the City is creating 20 to 25 tiny home shelters at the Multi-Service Center for people experiencing homelessness, but they donât plan to stop there. At its Tuesday, Feb. 8 meeting, the Long Beach City Council directed staff to look for funding opportunities and potential partnerships to create additional tiny home shelters in the city. âObviously this is not the panacea, this is not the only answer to deal with our homeless crisis,â said Councilmember Al Austin, who authored the item. âBut itâs the most immediate solution we have at our disposal, and itâs not as expensive with the government structure.â Tiny home shelters are small, equally sized dwellings that provide basic amenities to the unhoused. They offer residents a bed, storage space, and privacy not found in congregate shelters. In January, the Health Department presented its plan to build tiny home shelters outside the Multi-Service Centerâa hub for many of the Cityâs case management and homeless outreach activities. The $1.2 million project, funded by the Long Beach Recovery Act, will give residents in need close access to case management services and other Continuum of Care services at the center. During Long Beachâs January 2020 Point-In-Time Count, the City identified 2,034 individuals experiencing homelessness. Of see TINY SHELTERS page 3
Councilmembers cite strain on resources and time given affordable housing deadlines
T Anita W. Harris Senior rW iter
he Signal Hill City Council decided on Tuesday, Feb. 8, not to move forward with a ballot measure allowing voters to decide whether cannabis businesses can operate in the cityâreversing a decision it made on Jan. 25. The council agreed on Jan. 25 to allow Signal Hill voters the opportunity to approve or deny a resolution allowing up to two cannabis businesses and taxing them to provide revenue to the City. On Tuesday, however, in reviewing a âcannabis roadmapâ with steps for getting the resolution onto the November 2022 ballot, the council voted 3-2 in favor of a motion by Vice Mayor Tina Hansen not to proceed forward. Councilmember Lori Woods seconded the motion, with Hansen, Woods and Mayor Keir Jones voting in favor of tabling the ballot measure. Councilmembers Robert Copeland and Edward Wilson voted against the motion. At the Jan. 25 meeting, however, Jones voted with Copeland and Wilson to move forward with a ballot measure while Han-
Friday, February 11, 2022
sen and Woods voted against. Jones confirmed with the Signal Tribune after Tuesdayâs meeting that the City will not proceed with placing a cannabis resolution on the November 2022 ballot and explained changing the direction of his vote between Jan. 25 and Feb. 8. âWhen it became apparent to me that there was not enough council support to get a 4 out of 5 vote on the roadmapâ which is what is needed to put a revenue measure on the ballotâI decided staff time would be better served for our residents by working on more pressing priorities,â Jones told the Signal Tribune. COUNCIL VOTES IN FAVOR OF DRAFTING CANNABIS MEASURE FOR NOVEMBER BALLOT Tina Hansen Lori Woods Keir Jones Robert Copeland Edward Wilson
Jan. 25 Feb. 8 No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
*A supermajority would have been required in July to add the cannabis measure to the ballot.
Per City Manager Hannah Shin-Heydornâs âcannabis roadmapâ report, since the cannabis resolution would include taxation, the council could only legally approve it for the ballot with a âsupermajorityâ vote of four out of five council members in favor instead of the usual three out of five approving. The City would also have to pay see CANNABIS VOTE page 2
Richard H. Grant | Signal Tribune
Tenant organizer Maria Lopez makes a speech outside of the Aqua Victory apartment Complex during a car caravan calling for substantial rehabilitation to be removed as a just cause for eviction in Long Beach on May 22, 2021.
LB Council moves forward motion to make substantial remodel evictions more difficult, expensive Emma DiMaggio Managing d E itor
Evictions for substantial remodels will soon be more difficult and more expensive for landlords under a new ordinance moved forward by the Long Beach City Council Tuesday, Feb. 8. If approved at next weekâs council meeting, landlords who want to evict their tenants to substantially remodel their units will be required to pay relocation assistance to tenants (at least $4,500). They could also face civil fines of up to $15,000 if they illegally evict their tenants. The ordinance also has a data-collection component, as Long Beach currently has no concrete data on such evictions in the city. In order to receive permits (a local requirement for substantial remodel evictions), landlords will be required to provide a complete list of tenants who will be evicted in relation to the permitted work. âWhat we have here today are concrete actions that will make a difference to our renters at a lower cost to both our city and landlords,â Councilmember Cindy Allen said, noting that the changes would see REMODEL EVICTIONS page 2