The Gadfly, Vol. XXXIV, Issue 4

!"#

$%&'()

-#./)*%01"2*#(%3%45 6"789%6"789%6"78:::%3%4; %<1"$=(=%>'(+&(18%3%4?% @(A*($,'()*&'+,"-.)$-%'(/)*01%3%4B

!"#$%&'()!$*&++,-,$.$/0$*&++,-,$12,3$1((14&+5!3$67$89:09$.$!,4"#$9;3$8098$.$2&+#$<<<52$.$5!!=,$0:

!"##"$%&'(%!"#$%&%")#*)(%+&, photo by Reza Djalal

The Gadfly

60 College Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21401 sjca.gadfly@gmail.com www.issuu.com/sjcgadfly www.facebook.com/sjcagadfly Founded in 1980, the Gadfly is the student newsmagazine distributed to over 600 students, faculty, and staff of the Annapolis campus.

!"#$%!"#$%& <<

The student newspaper of St. John’s College

02

'(!#!)*+,-$(.$./!0-*1+.-

D

ear student interested in sociology, “mass psychology,” and its “experiments”:

The Gadfly meets in the Hodson House.

Please use the front door.

I spoke to you unjustly in the Question Period Friday night, and I’m sorry. It was wrong of me to cut off as I did the presentation you wanted to make of the social science experiments that inform your perspective on the issues being explored. A speaker who makes much of the rules of fair debate should play by his own rules. In the enthusiasm of my own opinions, I failed to do this, and that set a bad example, which was not only wrong but also embarrassing to me.

I take this means of trying to right my wrong, and of asking you to seek me out so that we can continue our conversation on a more equal footing. I think we both could learn from doing so.

Articles should be submitted by Friday at 11:59 PM to sjca.gadfly@gmail.com.

Sincerely,

Staff Nathan Goldman • Editor-in-Chief Ian Tuttle • Editor-in-Chief Hayden Pendergrass • Layout Editor Reza Djalal • Photographer Sasha Welm • Cartoonist Will Brown • Staff Andrew Kriehn • Staff Sarah Meggison • Staff Kevin Morris • Staff Charles Zug • Staff Jonathan Barone • Intern Contributors William Braithwaite Robert Malka Connor Callahan Bryce Northington Alvaro Duran Joseph Vallely

!"#$%&'(%)*+&#",-

T

wo notes for our faithful Gadfly readers: 1) Because of Mr. Duran’s and Mr. Malka’s sterling political commentary in this week’s pages, “Bursting the Johnnie Bubble” is taking a week off. But fear not—it will return next week.

2) We are hard at work preparing a special issue of the Gadfly to appear the weekend of Homecoming. This year’s program will include several events open to students, so make sure to take a glance at the Homecoming schedule, to be published in next week’s issue.

William Braithwaite Tutor

<<

Opinions expressed within are the sole responsibility of the author(s). The Gadfly reserves the right to accept, reject, and edit submissions in any way necessary to publish a professional, informative, and thought-provoking newsmagazine.

2!3+4*+,-

D

ear sneezy, drippy, hacking student:

While the campus’s population of firstborn appears to remain intact, you have no doubt realized that the first wave of Johnnie Plague has struck. With vengeance.

For the sake of the general welfare (and common defense) of the Polity, this concerned student politely requests that, as you grapple with this contagion, you kindly realize the benefits of Germ-X. Should that remain ineffective, feel free to boil your hands. In tutorials, please place a chair, or a sheet of Plexiglass, between us; in seminar, take to the corners or the back wall. Or sit in the hallway. We’ll speak up.

I really do hope you feel better.

But in the meantime, please do not take offense if I flee from your presence in a Hazmat suit.

Sincerely, Genial Germaphobe

The Gadfly

03

!"#$%&'()*+",-

!"##$%&"'()*%+,-.

As the Albany Bureau Chief of the New York Times, Danny Hakim has used the skill of considered questioning for many years as a journalist.

In this profile, he outlines a few paths that future Johnnie journalists can take to enter the field.

Danny Hakim, A’93, Albany Bureau Chief of the NYT.

What is your current job?

I’m the Albany Bureau Chief of the New York Times.

reporting at a top newspaper, and then also experienced shoe leather reporting on a much more intimate and intense scale.

Did you attend other schools after St. John’s?

Other than two weeks at art school, no.

Any general advice, especially for an upperclassman who is interested in this field but is not quite sure what to do?

Try to do some freelancing and build up a clip file. Even if you can’t get a job in the industry after you graduate, getting freelance work is a lot easier than finding a job. Be prepared to be frustrated in your job search, but also be persistent. If you don’t get an answer from an editor you send an email to, call them, follow up, try to find a balance between being persistent and being a pest. But remember that reporters are supposed to be pesky, so don’t be afraid to be.

Did you know what you wanted to do while attending St. John’s?

Yes, I wanted to be a painter, but I got the bug for journalism not long after I graduated.

Did St. John’s help prepare you for work in the field?

Absolutely. St. John’s taught me how to think, which helps in just about any field. As a journalist, you obviously always want to be asking questions, searching for answers and trying to see things in different ways, and those are all skills you spend a lot of time learning at St. John’s.

Any specific disadvantages to a St. John’s background?

Obviously, there are some specialized skills you don’t pick up at St. John’s. In my field, for instance, students who study at formal journalism programs can learn skills like computer assisted reporting—the growing field of mining and analyzing government databases for stories. But those are specific skills you can learn along the way.

How did you feel you compared, in graduate school or early jobs, to people from different educational backgrounds, particularly those with field-related degrees?

I don’t think it really made a big difference—most of journalism is learning on the job.

Can you describe a general track someone from St. John’s might take to get into a career in this field?

There are a number of avenues to take, though the economic climate isn’t all that encouraging for starting out in journalism.

If I was starting out today, I’d apply to small newspapers around the country, in out of the way places, and see if I could find some work. Sometimes you need to do an internship or work as a clerk at a larger paper to build up some credentials to get a full-time reporting job at a smaller paper. But it’s worth it. The advantage of working at a smaller paper is that you get to do a lot of different things, cover a range of different beats at once, and learn a lot of different skills. Those are lessons you can build on the rest of your career. I started out as a clerk at the Washington Post—it took me four interviews over six months just to get a job in the mailroom. A couple years later, I got a job at a paper in the Bible Belt covering crime. Both experiences helped me tremendously. I got a taste for national

How did you market yourself with a St. John’s degree?

I can’t say I really did—I tried to let my work speak for itself.

More people than I expected knew about St. John’s, though, and for those who did it was always a conversation point.

How would you characterize your field as a whole? Is it accessible to newcomers or difficult to enter? Stable or fluid? Etc. Journalism is going through a rough transformation period, so I wouldn’t call it stable. It’s not particularly accessible to newcomers, but people who are really interesting in journalism always find a way to make a go of it. But it’s competitive.

What was your senior essay topic?

My senior essay was about the meaning of the Mona Lisa. If I remembered more about it I’d tell you. I didn’t really learn how to write well until I was paid for it, but it was fun spending a lot of time deconstructing Da Vinci’s approach to painting.

What is your favorite book on the Program?

I think the Greeks had the greatest impact on me—Plato, the Iliad, Aristotle, etc.—perhaps because they were the first things I read as a Johnnie and freshman year was such an eye opener for me. I went to a traditional Southern private school where I was lectured at most of the time, so I was never really excited by learning in high school. Debating the Greeks that first year was shocking and exciting.

Do you find that you lead a philosophical life?

Definitely not as much as I’d like to. I’m best known in journalism circles for being one of the lead reporters on the Times team that broke the Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal, so my job is less about philosophy and more about the here and now. !

The Gadfly

04

!"#$%&!"#$%&!"#$'''&

Robert Malka

A

!"#$#%&$#%'()*

A’15

week and a half ago, the Democratic/Republican Na- quite the flat world Friedman, a modern economist, predicted, tional Conventions ended, after much unnecessary pomp but countries are nevertheless competing with each other on and a shrieking news cycle, for an audience that digests these the world stage as they try to improve their and their citizens’ scripted soap operas to reassure themselves that only their livelihoods. This is manifestly not the solution. Let compapeople have the right solutions for America. Sadly, neither nies compete! Let the market regulate itself to give us the best have it, especially when it comes to the one issue that every products and services. But let us not put our livelihoods on the poll states is the nation’s supreme prerogative: jobs. We lack table—no country should have to risk its children in the fight jobs in this country, and everybody knows it. People live their to make itself relevant. lives around this daunting fact, and the conventions built So where is this middle ground of which I speak? The late themselves around it. So for all that political theater, what did Sir James Goldsmith, a business tycoon, not only predicted the conventions have to offer the American today’s conflict, but proposed that if counpeople?

Let companies compete! tries implemented tariffs, it would make Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Romney Let the market regulate economics regional, forcing companies to preached about his business acumen, and itself to give us the best care about where they are and what they even policy wonk President Bill Clinton do to their consumers and workers. In othproducts and services. just kept score: “In the last fifty-four years… er words, we would sell products and serRepublicans [have created] twenty-four vices made and facilitated by Americans to million [ jobs]. Democrats: forty-two [million].” And so on. Americans. Yes, prices would go up, but so would wages, and Distinctly lacking was an honest explanation of the unprec- who knows? We might even be able to have jobs. And with taredented economic times we’re in. Distinctly wanting is an au- iffs set at a proper rate, it wouldn’t exclude international trade. dience willing to listen.

The economy exists to serve us. It is not our God. And if we So why are these economic times unprecedented? Let us be- don’t do something soon to put our economy on a leash, we gin with the transnational corporation (TNC). Never has the might as well embrace now what Steve Jobs said to President company, in any period in history, been so disconnected from Obama just before his death: “Those jobs aren’t coming back.” the areas in which it operates. When a TNC finds cheaper And neither is the America we grew up in. Maybe we should wages anywhere in the world, it races there to set up shop, of- tell those people running for president. ! ten making workers put up with very extreme working conditions. And as wages, prices, and quality of living in that country rise, and the people begin to ask for more, they scramble to yet another country, to indulge in the same process all over ! Painter Bob again. First it was Mexico, then China, and now Vietnam. This !"#$%&'()&%$%'$*+,%-.$%&-$/'-0$'1$2,1is a race to the bottom, a futile digging of holes in search of '+$3-%%-+$4-%.$'1$#-5%& water, oil, and gold, from which we may never be able to get '+.$'6-$'1$)'#.$%'$%-22$&,7$*,22 ourselves out. '+$3-7%$'1$522.$*&5%"7$2'8-9 Already we begin to see the very alarming effects of this pro3(%.$*&5%$!$+-5224$1--2$%'#54 gression: The CEO of a mining company in Australia insisted 5+-$:(+,'(7$6'%,'67$'1$%&-$0,6# that Australians should get used to working for under $2/day ,6$0-.$*&'"7$'11$(/'6$%&,7$#54 to keep up with the Africans. Indeed, if this keeps up, we’ll get /-+&5/7.$7'0-*&-+-$%'$;6# our “jobs” eventually, and they’ll be McJobs.

5$1+,-6#24$8',:-$'(%$%&-+But the TNC is a symptom. Corporations have the right to *&'"22$7&5+-$5$%&,6)$'+$%*' profit from their endeavors, and employees of the company *,%&$56'%&-+$+,)&%$'##$/-+7'6.$*&' have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders. The more 0,)&%$-8-6.$<(7%$3-$4'( fundamental structural issue is globalization. True, it’s not

“

!"#$%&'&()$#)(

The Gadfly

!"#$%&%'()&*+&", Alvaro Duran

T

05

GI

he only thing that needs to be known about the boring, need for the government to apologize for the legal acts of its camp movie trailer, Innocence of Muslims, is that the en- citizens. Even before the Islamist flag was unfurled over our tire production is rife with cowardice. The pseudonym of its embassy grounds, the cowering inhabitants within were alcreator, “Sam Bacile,” the attribution of the film to a shadowy ready condemning “the continuing efforts by misguided indicabal of Jews, the incessant overdubbing in the dialogue—the viduals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims,” as well as entire movie is a heap of spineless strata, all piled in an art- the “efforts to offend believers of all religions.” This condemless mess. Let us not, then, compare it to the Jyllands-Posten nation, which came a bit late (the film has been up since early Muhammad cartoons, which were satiric, openly published, July), apparently did not have the effect its besieged authors properly attributed, and part of a societal discussion on the anticipated. The grounds were stormed shortly after. After the intolerances of Islam. Artistry aside, however, the film is prob- mayhem, the embassy once again reaffirmed its criticism of ably the least important issue regarding the storming of our American citizens before removing the posts completely. embassies and consulates in the Middle East.

President Obama correctly disavowed the Egyptian emAs many news sources have reported, most “protesters” bassy messages, saying they had not been cleared by him and have never seen the film and are, instead, fomented to action did not “reflect the views of the United States government.” by religious zeal and a crude desire for self-expression and The commander-in-chief, however, must have lost control of self-determination. Jihadist groups that had been forced to his subordinates afterwards. General Martin Dempsey, chairtread in the shadows under dictatorships are now free to vio- man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called the odious pastor, Terry late diplomatic immunities at will—many Jones, to convince him to step away from doubtlessly encouraged by the impotence In addition, this sad episode the film. What business does a ranking of local police and the half-hearted disgovernment official have trying to comhas shown the complete couragements of political leaders. In adpel the choices of one if its citizens? To ineptitude of the Obama dition, this sad episode has shown the try and save lives, you say? It didn’t matadministration, as well as complete ineptitude of the Obama adminter a whit, as I showed above, that the istration, as well as the sinister uselessEgyptian embassy openly condemned the the sinister uselessness of ness of religion. filmmakers. The grounds were still overreligion.

Coming on the eleventh anniversary run and desecrated. And now there are of al-Qaeda’s greatest victory in the West, why Obama chose rumors that Obama himself called YouTube up to try and presto man a consulate in a newly liberated nation known to be sure them to take the video down. A cosmopolitan president populated with jihadists with little security is something ev- like Obama should have realized that once something goes ery citizen should be demanding to know. Likewise, we should viral no one can “take it down.” More chillingly, what is the be demanding to know why the Egyptian embassy rolled over president doing trying to personally lean on a company that and allowed American soil (which is what an embassy is) to be hasn’t done anything illegal? What in the world could he have overflown by an Islamist flag. Should we not have a company been thinking that would have let him believe that was a good of Marines in every embassy and consulate in the Middle East idea? Any fool who thinks that by silencing citizens at home liberally armed with rubber bullets to prevent such a gross hu- they can save some abroad has been asleep for at least the last miliation? And just as liberally armed with live ammunition to eleven years. prevent the lynchings of our ambassadors?

Mitt Romney shows no more promise in being a compeAnd what of the politicians that have permitted these at- tent war-fighter than Obama, either. While the smoke was tacks to take place? Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi—a still rising in Cairo and the blood was still fresh on the paveweird and sinister man who has said the U.S. “has never pre- ment in Benghazi, the “caring and compassionate” man we sented any evidences on the identity of those who committed kept hearing about during the RNC decided this would be the [9/11]”—made his first remarks on the storming of our embas- perfect time to score some political points. Standing at the sy not by denouncing the assaults, but instead calling for the podium, he extended his condolences and then proceeded to prosecution of the filmmakers responsible and directing the smirk through a cheap and ultimately inaccurate attack on a Egyptian embassy in the U.S. to initiate “all possible legal ac- supposed apology from Obama. He correctly noted that the tion” against the producers. Morsi received his doctorate de- president is ultimately responsible for the messages that his gree from the University of Southern California, so he is famil- ambassadors give out, but Romney equated the mistaken coniar with American safeguards on freedom of expression. This demnation by the government of a legal action by a citizen to cheap demagoguery, therefore, is only to appeal to the most “apologizing for the right of free speech.” This was a twistprovincial and twisted louts in the electorate—many of whom ed overreach—an opportunistic grab for poll numbers—and were gleefully torching our flag. it showed, all too painfully, what a charmless Machiavellian But the most depressing aspect of this tragedy has been the looks like. spinelessness and opportunistic quality of our current and Continued On Pg. 06 prospective leaders. First is the constant (almost compulsive)

“

The Gadfly

06

!"#$%&'()#*#$+,-"'.$/0'("&12#.$

A Review of Two Heavy-Hitters: Part I Charles Zug

S

A’15

ocial justice. Racial sensitivity. Gender equality. These more dramatic and blended interpretation of the first symissues matter. But there is another we often forget, that phony as being most convincing. However, I think Dohnanyi should have a regular presence in our daily lives. deserves much listening to: Because he calls for more separaThe choice between recordings of Brahms symphonies tion between orchestral sections, he brings to the surface nucan appear daunting. Occupying a “salt of merous counter-melodies and motifs that the earth” position within Romantic music, could easily, in Karajan’s interpretation, go The choice between these symphonies have been, and are reguunheard. recordings of Brahms larly, recorded by the best orchestras and the In the second part of this series, I will symphonies can appear review the second and fourth movements best conductors. For this reason I have selected two well-known complete recordings of the second symphony in D major, as well daunting. as the subjects of my comparative review.* as the first movement of the third symphony From the first bar of the first symphony in F major. ! and onward, the differences that characterize the styles of Dohnanyi and Karajan are loud and apparent. Dohnanyi treats *Reviewed: every section of the orchestra as an individual part: because > Brahms: Symphonies, Overtures, and Violin Concerto, by of this, the carefully punctuated timpani-strokes dominate the Christoph von Dohnanyi and the Cleveland Orchestra introduction of the first symphony. Karajan, in classic form, > Brahms: The Complete Symphonies, by Herbert von Karablends the timpani with the rest of the ensemble, and with jan and the Berlin Philharmonic the help of the first violins, makes the tutti sound like a single menacing instrument. Interestingly, even though Karajan calls for more blended orchestration, he generally pays much Continued From Pg. 05 more attention to individual moments in the piece; that is, he undertakes a more dramatic reading of the score. So, whereas It’s disheartening to see the level of stupidity, confusion, Dohnanyi maintains a solid tempo throughout the introducand ignorance regarding free speech—and I mean in the tion, Karajan willingly relaxes or exaggerates the tempo acU.S. Hack writers and scholars of all stripes emerged to cording to the drama of each moment, with mixed results. His argue about the filmmakers “abusing” the rights of free handling of the introduction is superb; his handling of the bespeech. This, by the way, is weak, veiled language that ginning of the exposition is not. The first theme sounds scatinsinuates that the producers exceeded some predetertered and chaotic as it bursts forth from the slow, brooding mined boundary that lies outside of the protections of the introduction. Dohnanyi lessens the change in in tempo, and government. It’s a way to nudge forward the idea of prostherein renders a much more convincing exposition. ecuting them without going right out and saying it. (Talk However, Dohnanyi orchestrates the development section about abusing free speech.) Everywhere, “shouting ‘fire’ much more effectively, by drawing-out and making more apin a crowded theater” was becoming the slogan of the ofparent the dialogue between the strings and the brass: in dofended. This stupid phrase, by the way, was coined by the ing this, he both heightens the drama, and exposes several overrated, over-quoted Oliver Wendell Holmes in a Susignificant reoccurring rhythmic and melodic motives that are preme Court case that upheld the censoring of someone otherwise indistinguishable in Karajan’s interpretation. Unprotesting the drafting of men for a nationalist war. (Why, fortunately, Dohnanyi does not maintain his poise throughout I wonder, do we not marvel over the supposed genius of the recapitulation: there is one short, yet infinitely important Holmes when he writes that “it is better for all the world series of horn calls that he entirely disregards. Here the score if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for clearly calls for fortissimo: crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can

“

But Dohnanyi blows it, offering a stifled mezzo forte at best.

Karajan, in allowing the horns their proper loudness, clearly understands the significance this fanfare-like moment that so obviously foreshadows the mood of the fourth movement.

Because of these as well as other examples, I view Karajan’s

prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind”?) Either way, the usually competent Christiane Amanpour cited the “crowded theater” ruling. The absurd Stephen Prothero, professor of religion at Boston University, did as well. Anthea Butler, another (surprise) professor of religion from the University of Pennsylvania, wrote that it is “important to remember that other countries and cultures do not have to understand or respect our right.”

If there is a crowded theater we’re all in, I would consider these comments to be a certain smoldering. !

The Gadfly

07

A Review of Tiny Beautiful Things Nathan Goldman

T

!""#$%#% ! Connor Callahan, A’14 & Bryce Northington

Today

I dreamt I filed my nails down to the quick they bled until the sun turned orange warm colors burned my brain while the soft summer rain came tumbling down and we drowned and we were buried in the sea of forgotten dreams Cigarettes burned bright and our nails still bloody were mirror images mere images of our souls Tried and tired beyond all belief we strove to grow our garden trimming it with more delicacy than we chewed on our nails It bloomed in the spring and died in the fall as all things must Quickly we harvested what was left and quietly we let the garden go to seed allowed it to fallow for the year our hearts were buried in the mud rich dark full of power And yet so inconsequential it’s just dirt ashes dust All becomes one with the sea

A’14

he first Dear Sugar column I read two strangers (most of the letter writwas “How You Get Unstuck,” in ers are, like Sugar, pseudonymous) but which Sugar consoles a woman devas- in fact shared with anyone with Intertated by a miscarriage. Those who ex- net access—and now anyone with this pect her to move on gracefully from the book. That Strayed has now gone pubtrauma, Sugar tells her, “live on Planet lic alters but does not diminish this.

Earth. You live on Planet My Baby So Strayed’s take on the form is inDied.” I was 18 and in my senior year ventive. But her patience and tenderof high school, and I must have read ness distinguish her, too. She is direct the column three times in fewer days. and sometimes severe, but she never Overnight I joined the huge following condemns. Her empathy is infectious, devoted to this then-anonymous advice and it’s needed. Many if not all of us columnist redefining the form. are gossips, hungering for others’ stoTiny Beautiful Things: Advice on Love ries and secrets. One of the advice coland Life from Dear Sugar collects more umn’s appeals is the promise of nosing than 50 columns by Sugar, aka novelist/ into someone else’s business, often to memoirist Cheryl Strayed. It includes gawk and mock and judge. Rather than a well-curated selection of the pieces nourish that prurient want, Strayed’s originally published on The Rumpus columns transform it. Removed leering and a handful of colbecomes involved lisumns, some very brief, tening. Judgment gives not previously pubway to compassion. lished. Steve Almond, Tiny Beautiful Things who originally had the is a collection of these Sugar gig, contributes columns and it is more a tender, exultant forethan that. As a work it word, and micro interhas an integrity all its views with Strayed inown. Though organized troduce each of the five thematically rather themed sections. than chronologically, These columns are the book has the feel unusual because many of an epistolary novel, are as much about the or, more appropriately, adviser as the advisee. an epistolary memoir.

They’re part advice, It is a fractured look at part personal essay. But Strayed’s life as filtered Tiny Beautiful Things: it is not simply Strayed’s through others’ lives, Advice on Love and Life inclusion of her own so it’s a kind of collabfrom Dear Sugar stories that makes her orative memoir, too.

by Cheryl Strayed singular in her field.

In terms of the advice Vintage, 2012 Rather, it’s the delicate itself, though Strayed 368 pages, $14.95 way she interweaves never exactly repeats these stories into the herself, the more you pieces. She makes it clear not only that read the columns, the more you can advice and anecdote are not discrete anticipate what she’ll advise. Ethical components of each column, but also principles emerge as themes reoccur: that all advice bears in it one’s own sto- Strayed emphasizes honesty (with oneries. When we ask someone, stranger self and others), gratitude, boundary or friend, “What are my options? What setting, humility, and unreserved emshould I do?”, implicit in the question is pathy. Nothing revolutionary, but much another: “What has your life taught you that is vital. about living that might help you to adTiny Beautiful Things ends up being vise me?” Our lives inform our choices something less systematic and rigorous and thus our counsel. By writing about than an ethical treatise but far more herself, Strayed imbues her advice with lyrical than a typical self-help book. It a rare transparency and an authentic is practical but also meditative, a salve credibility. as well as a call to self-examination. It Strayed’s openness also fosters a po- is an elegant ode to the troubles we face tent intimacy, if a strange one. It’s an and our luck at not having to face them intimacy in one sense shared between alone. !

The Gadfly

08

!"#$%&'() *+*',-

photo courtesy of Janette Beckman

!"#$%&'()*+, !"#$%&"'()*+%$,(-$."/(0"'' 11234(5!( ( 678"%(9+::.$( 3(;!

-#%.#$%&'()*+) 5'&.<$"(=>"? !.''+8(@ABC@AD E(;!

F'/%?"/.(G$%H<..

-(IHJ(0,(@234(;!

K(IHJ(L,(3(;!

9/J(M+*8NH()*+$7H,(-$."/(0"'' E(;! /01%&'()*2+ )+8:.$/2(;"$O.$(9/$%8&(P7"$/./( G96(57#%/+$%7?

D214(;!

3&4"0%&'()*22 F'/%?"/.(G$%H<..

L(IHJ(9,(12QA(;!

0(IHJ(K,(12QA(;! )*%8.H.(R."(0+7H. 9S.:/+$(1H/ Q2QA(;!

3".%&'()*25 9+::.$ (-(I(K,(12QA(;!

(9(I(0,(Q2AA(;! !"#$%(!../%8&,( T+U.$('.I.'(+V(/*.(WW) E(;!

XV(Y+7(U+7'#('%O.(/+(H..(Y+7$( .I.8/(+8(/*.(U..O'Y(H:*.#7'.,( S'."H.(.?"%'(HZ:"J&"#[Y\ &?"%'J:+?J

!"#$%&'(#'$)*'+,-$./&'*#* !"#$%&$'(%)&$%*('##+%,-'(./-011012% 3'(4$(%5)(012%67'()$)8% 9(0.'+:%5$;)$#<$(%=> ?8>@%3A 95B%,7.0)"(07#C% D&$%5)C%E"&1FG%H'I"(0)$G%-0JJ%;J'+%G$J$K/ )0"1G%H("#%5K&7<$():%L(0))$1:%'1.%3M()C