Stage 3 Masterplan Ideas Report

Regeneration Masterplan Sligo East City Cranmore and Environs Stage 3 Overview Report Ideas for Masterplan Proposals and Actions Building on our past‌looking to our future

February 2014

Masterplan Team: DMOD Metropolitan Workshop Stephen Little & Associates Arup Mitchell + Associates Ann Irwin & Niall Crowley Ciaran Murray Bernard Williams and Associates Mulcahy McDonagh & Partners

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Contents

Page

Introduction

3

Executive Summary

5

Overview of the Physical, Social and Economic Plans

8

Photographs of Exhibition

15

Photographs of Walkabout

16

Exhibition of Regeneration Ideas

17

Feedback from Public Exhibition

38

Appendix A Full List of Comments

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

88

Page 2

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Introduction

Model of Regeneration Area, view looking south west

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 3

M

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Introduction

Overview of the Masterplan Process so far Stages 1 - 3, 2013 - 2014

The core objective for the Regeneration of Cranmore and Sligo East City is to build a sustainable community through a combination of social, economic and physical initiatives.

‘Developing a long term vision for the Regeneration of the area is important both for the communities who live in the area, and strategically for the whole of Sligo and the North West’.* The Regeneration Masterplan process is made up of 5 stages (see process timeline below).

In Stage 1 the Design Team developed a socio-economic profile of the East City Area.

Recommendations for the extent of the boundary area for regeneration were made, based on the levels of disadvantage found in the area. Results from the 2011 census were key to this socio-economic assessment.

The Stage 1 Report was also informed by consultations with agencies and community groups working in the area, and their experiences in working with residents.

In Stage 2 the Design Team built on the Stage 1 socioeconomic baseline, and provided an assessment of the physical environment, its strengths, weaknesses and opportunities.

In Stage 3 the Design Team provided Masterplan ideas for the physical, social and economic regeneration of Cranmore and Sligo East City. Following workshops and a public exhibition of the preliminary Masterplan ideas, the feedback from the communities and various stakeholder agencies was collated and analysed by the Masterplan Team. The levels of support for the various Masterplan ideas for the physical, social and economic regeneration is indicated in this report. All of this information will inform the work of the Design Team in Stage 4. Successful realisation of the Masterplan will depend on the long-term engagement and ‘buy-in’ of a number of key stakeholders.

Social

Economic

Physical

Next Steps : Stage 4 : 2015

The Design Team will develop and refine the Masterplan ideas to respond to commentary identified from the public exhibition during Stage 3.

A framework of principals and key priorities will be developed. The Stage 4 report will include budget costings and cost benefit appraisal with a phasing strategy for delivery of the Masterplan ideas over a period of ten years. Stage 4 will include workshops and an open day, providing opportunities for final refinement of strategies. Stage 5 will see the production of the finalised Masterplan.

The Regeneration Project was tasked with addressing the needs of communities in Sligo East City who are ‘experiencing significant social and economic disadvantage, living in areas of poor quality housing and infrastructure’ **. This was a key factor influencing the development of proposals for the Regeneration Masterplan.

In detailed consultation with residents and stakeholders in the area, the Design team identified areas of need (and opportunity) that the Regeneration Project could address.

Public Exhibition of Masterplan Ideas July 2014

Reports were compiled on the movement framework in the area, on housing condition and housing needs, on the potential for a sustainable energy strategy, on the open spaces and ecology of the area, the public utilities and on planning policy.

A detailed urban design analysis drawing on the various assessments, examined the East City neighbourhood and the important factors that affect people’s perceptions and enjoyment of the area was compiled.

Public Exhibition of Masterplan Ideas July 2014

All of these elements informed ideas for Stage 3.

Public Exhibition of Masterplan Ideas July 2014 *SBC Masterplan brief for the Design Team ** Letter from DoECLG regarding Stage 1 Report to SBC: 24th May 2013 Public Exhibition of Masterplan Ideas July 2014

Masterplan Timeline: Consultations

Consultations

STAGE 2 : 12 weeks A

M

J

J

A

STAGE 3 : 24 weeks S

O

N

D

J 2013

Date issued: February 2015

Consultations

F

M

A

M

J

Exhibition

Exhibition

STAGE 5 : 10 weeks

STAGE 4 : 14 weeks J

A

S

O

N

D

J

F

M

A

M

2014

Stage 3

Page 4

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Executive Summary

Model of Regeneration Area, view looking south east

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 5

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Executive Summary : Stage 3 Overview Report Stage 3 builds on the information gathered during workshops, consultations and research in Stages 1 and 2. The process of developing a Stage 3 Masterplan for Cranmore and Sligo East City has been a holistic one reviewing the social, economic and physical needs through detailed consultation. These three elements must be interlinked. In response, a vision outlined for Regeneration has been proposed by the Design Team:

The Vision for the Regeneration of the East City Area • • •

To make the East City area and Cranmore a more attractive place to live with better, more convenient connections to existing and new facilities, locally and in the rest of Sligo.

To enable individuals and communities of the area to avail of opportunities, with good access to employment, education, health and family support services.

To see the East City area become the location of choice for future generations to live, work and visit.

How do we achieve this vision?

Social and Economic Initiatives will focus on the needs of people and identify the strengths of the East City area.

Physical interventions will address needs and make the most of the area through: • • • • • • • •

Improving access to quality amenities and open spaces Promoting historical and landscape assets in the area Providing quality spaces for community facilities Improving quality of the roads, streets and urban spaces Improving access and links Getting the most potential out of the vacant and potential sites in the area Exploring options for sustainable energy to reduce energy costs Improving housing quality and opportunity in the area

Public Exhibition

Stage 3 must be seen as part of a 5 stage Masterplan process where strategies and recommendations will be further developed and refined following consultations with all of the stakeholders and the Department of Environment, Community and Local Government.

The Stage 3 process is documented in three draft reports. This document provides an overview but should be read in conjunction with the full Draft Social and Economic Plans.

Public Exhibition

Model of Regeneration Area, view looking north east

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 6

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Stage 3 : Exhibition of Masterplan Ideas In Stage 3 a series of ideas and urban design strategies were generated by the multi-disciplinary Design team. A public exhibition of these proposals was designed to gather responses from local communities and stakeholders on the masterplan strategies.

The exhibition consisted of a series of display panels which outlined the social and economic plans and ideas for physical regeneration: looking at the potential opportunities within the area, identifying key sites and historical assets, developing options for improving quality of housing, roads and open spaces, access and links, and sustainable energy options.

A3 versions of the exhibition panels are included in Section 2 of this report for reference. Also on display in the exhibition was a large central map of the whole regeneration area, with flags indicating the location of all the Design Team ideas. In addition there were animated videos of key sites in the area to allow people to experience what it would be like to move through these proposals. 335 people attended the exhibition, 205 questionnaires were returned and 3 letters received in response to the exhibition material.

Section 3 of this report contains the Masterplan Team’s analysis of feedback from the Exhibition of ideas.

The questionnaires asked for feedback on the Key Themes for Regeneration and Ideas on display: people were asked in questionnaires to indicate if they would or would not support the proposals, with space for comments and ideas. The feedback has been analysed in detail. In summary there is a high level of support for all of the ideas and many of the ideas were widely supported within the community. In some cases specific questions have been raised and alternatives or modifications suggested. The list below provides an overview of the levels of support indicated by the questionnaires returned:

Economic Plan workshop September 2014

Questions A-D: Vision for Regeneration, Social, Economic and Physical (71-75% support for proposals) Questions 1-5: improving access to quality amenities and open spaces (71-79% support for various ideas) Questions 6-7: promoting historical assets in the area (71-80% support for various ideas) Questions 8-10: providing quality spaces for community facilities (43-77% support for various ideas) Questions 11-14: improving quality of the roads, streets and urban spaces (74-81% support for various ideas) Questions 15-20: improving access and links (61-75% support for various ideas) Questions 21-27: making the most of the vacant sites in the area (59-70% support for various ideas) Question 28: exploring options for sustainable energy (67% support for various ideas) Questions 29-31: improving housing quality and opportunity in the area (62-74% support for various ideas) Section 3 also looks in detail at the feedback for each of the specific ideas. We have analysed all of the comments received and we believe they have provided a very good insight into the reasons why people supported or had reservations about some of the proposals.

In our analysis of the Questionnaire feedback for each idea, we have charted the specific levels of support for the public record. We have assessed the comments and included an overview of the sentiments expressed. We have also provided a description of what we believe the Design Team has learnt from the feedback and comments, and we have identified a sample of the comments relating to each idea. The full set of comments and letters received in respect of the exhibition is included in the appendix.

The Masterplan Team wish to thank so many people who took the time to come to the public exhibition in such great numbers and who engaged with various members of the Regeneration Team during what was an exceptional week of public consultation and feedback. The team learnt so much from this engagement and many different insights were gained. We wish the community to know that we have listened to their specific suggestions and general comments and all of this communication has been fully documented and acknowledged in this Stage 3 report. We sincerely hope that this engagement will continue into Stage 4 as this will be critical in developing a successful Masterplan.

Walkabout

Aerial photograph looking south west

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 7

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Overview of the Physical, Social and Economic Plans

Model of Regeneration Area, view looking west

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 8

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Background to Stage 3

A Holistic Approach to Regeneration The process of developing a Masterplan for the Cranmore Sligo East City has been a holistic one looking at social, economic and physical needs simultaneously and only developing proposals and recommendations following detailed consultations with all the stakeholders and local communities.

Previous stage reports have concluded that a strategic integrated approach to the physical, social and economic planning is required to ensure that a focussed, multi disciplinary and inter-agency approach can be developed in the search for appropriate solutions.

The Stage 1 and 2 reports have clearly identified that the scale and physical layout of Cranmore, combined with a lack of investment in maintenance and with a concentration of high levels of socio economic disadvantage that this has resulted in a poor urban environment and a significantly disadvantaged community.

Unemployment and the low levels of education and skills combined with the stigma that this area has historically experienced has consistently been identified as major negative issue for this community. An analysis of all the key data available indicates clearly that Cranmore and East Sligo are areas of significant socio economic disadvantage.

The HP Pobal Depreciation Index for example indicates that the majority of those living in the regeneration area are either very disadvantaged or disadvantaged with scores significantly below those of the State and County Sligo.

Stage 1 and 2 reports acknowledges all of these facts but notes that a considerable amount of work has already taken place since 2004 as part of the Cranmore Regeneration Project resulting in some improvement for resident’s lives. However unfortunately as later surveys and more recent consultations indicate, significant challenges still remain for this Regeneration process as it moves to the next phases.

The social, economic and physical elements of the Masterplan proposals must be interlinked, complimentary and comprehensive. Stage 3 has focused on developing the ideas and recommendations that have emerged from the Stage 1 and 2 process through consultation, research and design development. These ideas are in response to the physical, social and economic needs identified by the Regeneration Team, statutory agencies and the community themselves.

The Stage 3 public exhibition illustrated ideas that have been explored and allowed a considerable public response to be harvested from that overall process. This consultation process has been extremely helpful in targeting ideas for considered responses. The issues are complex requiring all of the skills within the Masterplan Team to focus on how best to create opportunities for this community over the next ten years.

The Stage 3 Social Plan report states that education, training and economic development will be fundamental to making transformational and sustainable changes for this community. The Masterplan Team have adopted a lifecycle approach to resolving these problems to ensure that the strategies proposed adequately address the challenges for children, teenagers, people of working age and older people. This framework approach enables the Regeneration Team to address the cumulative and interlinked disadvantages expressed by the community in these consultations.

This will ultimately deliver a better physical, safer environment and produce a more sustainable community for people of all ages. While the physical ideas seem to be what many focus on there is also an understanding that this is only part of the solution.

Public Exhibition

Public Exhibition

Aerial photograph looking north east

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 9

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Interplay between Social, Economic and Physical Ideas The potential of the physical elements proposed in Stage 3 to contribute to the economic development of the regeneration area could be very significant. These Stage 3 proposals indicate considerable investment in housing, community facilities and infrastructure development in the area. The proposals in the Stage 3 Social Plan (particularly in the areas of education, health, unemployment and training) seek to create the conditions for the successful economic regeneration. Some of these proposals will require a physical infrastructural response.

The enormous feedback from the community following the public exhibition has now been reviewed. Many of the ideas proposed were widely supported, in some cases questions have been raised by the public and alternatives suggested. All of these issues are documented and analysed.

This regeneration process is designed as a 10 year plan. In that context the ideas proposed in Stage 3 have been identified for further detailed review and consideration in the next stages where a phasing strategy will also be proposed.

It has to be acknowledged that some of these proposals may not proceed or maybe phased or are likely to evolve throughout the lifetime of the regeneration project as both internal and external circumstances change. Funding sources must be identified for each project and perhaps priorities created to deal with the most serious deficiencies within the community. These plans therefore need to be flexible and be able to adapt and respond to the community needs over time. These strategies and actions are not designed to replace existing work rather they are designed to build on and consolidate strategies that are currently ongoing. This integrated Masterplan must also be capable of developing new strategies where a specific need has been identified as a result of the analysis produced.

The work of Stage 3 is now documented in three reports; the Draft Social and Economic Plan and this report, which contains all the Stage 3 exhibition materials and an analysis of the feedback in the questionnaires.

These proposals represent strategic recommendations in key areas and an integrated approach to the physical, social and economic planning of the area. The Masterplan Team wanted to ensure that the community is primed to take maximum advantage of the opportunities presented. These proposals can create the appropriate environment for the successful physical, social and economic regeneration of this community.

Aerial photograph looking east

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 10

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Overview Stage 3 : Developing Ideas for Regeneration Overview of the Stage 3 process: Developing Ideas for Regeneration Social Plan -

ideas and strategies generated through workshops and feedback from community representatives and agencies. This is documented in the Stage 3 Draft Social Plan.

Economic Plan -

ideas and strategies generated through workshops and feedback from community representatives and agencies. This is documented in the Stage 3 Draft Economic Plan.

Physical Plan -

a series of physical ideas and urban design strategies with the overview of Social and Economic Plan which were displayed in Stage 3 exhibition for feedback from the community through questionnaires.

Social

Economic

Physical

Purpose of Stage 3 Exhibition of Masterplan Ideas To display ideas for the Regeneration in the areas of physical social and economic environment. To gather responses to these ideas from local communities and stakeholders.

On display for week:

Monday 14th July - Saturday 19th July inclusive 10am - 7pm Monday 21st July 2pm - 5pm

How was the Exhibition Publicised?

• • • • • • • •

Newsletters, radio advertisements, newspaper advertisements Articles and photographs in local newspaper Radio interviews Sligo County Council website Use of social media: through ICLO and Co-Op facebook pages Invitations by email - community representatives and agency stakeholders Posters at key sites and venues, street banner at exhibition Flyers to individual houses in the area

Public Exhibition

What was on Display in the Exhibition?

•

• •

Panels illustrating the social economic plans and the physical ideas for regeneration. These are included in the following pages. These looked at potential of the area, key sites and historical assets, options for improving the quality of housing, roads and open spaces, links and sustainable energy options. We have attached A3 versions of the exhibition panels in section 2 of this report for reference. Also on display was a large central map of the whole regeneration area with flags indicated on the locations of all of the Design Team ideas.

Three short animations: showing walk through views for the key sites - Browns Field, Mercy / Geldof for proposals and Centre Block.

On the opening day of the exhibition a walkabout tour of the physical ideas presented in the exhibition was led by the Design Team.

Everyone who attended was asked to sign in and handed a feedback questionnaire to gather responses to the ideas.

A deadline for return of questionnaires was set for Friday 25th July 2014.

Public Exhibition

The exhibition was staffed by the Regeneration Team who were available to explain and answer questions. The exhibition was also attended by the ICLO (Independent Community Liaison Officer).

The exhibition material was put online on the County Council website after the close of the exhibition.

Who Attended the Exhibition?

335 people, mostly from the immediate surrounding community signed in 205 questionnaires were returned and three letters were received in respect of the exhibition The feedback from these questionnaires is included in Appendix A of this report.

Walkabout

Thanks to all who came The Masterplan Team wish to thank so many people who took the time to come to the public exhibition in such great numbers and who engaged with various members of the Regeneration Team during what was an exceptional week of public consultation and feedback. The team learnt so much from this engagement and many different insights were gained. We wish the community to know that we have listened to their specific suggestions and general comments and all of this communication has been fully documented and acknowledged in this Stage 3 report. We sincerely hope that this engagement will continue into Stage 4 as this will be critical in developing a successful Masterplan.

Walkabout

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 11

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Overview of the Draft Physical Plan for Regeneration The Physical Plan for the East Sligo project is a crucial element of the Regeneration Masterplan but it is also designed to work in conjunction with the Social and Economic elements of the Masterplan. The physical plan has emerged from extensive consultations undertaken in Stage 2. These identified needs in terms of housing, facilities, socio economic issues, traffic and streets. The urban design analysis by the Masterplan Team also identified issues and opportunities to be explored in the Masterplan.

Social

Physical interventions must address the needs of the area and maximise the potential of East Sligo • Improve access to quality amenities and open spaces • Promote historical and landscape assets in the area • Provide quality spaces for community facilities • Improve the quality of the roads, streets and urban spaces • Improve access and links to surrounding areas • Achieving the greatest potential out of the vacant sites in the area • Explore options for sustainable energy to reduce energy costs • Improve housing quality

Economic

Physical

These are the themes under which a series of ideas were developed by the Masterplan Team and presented in the Exhibition of Ideas.

The aim of the Physical Plan is to make East City a more attractive place to live and work, to eliminate dereliction, to create convenient connections to existing and new facilities locally and in the rest of Sligo. The Urban Design Assessment identified a number of specific issues for further analysis which the team felt could lead to great improvements.

The overriding impression of the team following the urban analysis are of a conveniently located district close to the heart of Sligo City and to considerable natural assets such as the Garavogue River, Cleveragh Regional Park and the spectacular views of surrounding mountains that really should be a very desirable place to live.

Each of the ideas identified in the Physical Plan will be reviewed again in Stage 4 informed by the feedback received.

Potential projects will be costed and a source of potential funding identified. Successful implementation of the Physical Plan will require an interdepartmental approach to regeneration at Government level. This should also include funding of the Social and Economic regeneration strategies identified by the Masterplan Team and a mandate from parent departments to agencies to prioritise projects in the regeneration areas at a local level.

The masterplan strategies must be approved by the stakeholder reference groups and reflect emerging national and local strategies specifically targeting the physical, social and economic disadvantages within this community.

There are significant challenges ahead • • •

The time frames for Regeneration are long term and maintaining the support of the community is critical while also managing expectations.

There is no guarantee of funding for any specific projects at present.

While there has been an improvement in public finances over the past number of months there is still uncertainty in the national and local economic recovery.

Having a clear vision for the Regeneration of this area which can be promoted will be an important first step in realising the potential for the area.

Public Exhibition

Public Exhibition

Model of Regeneration Area, view looking north

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 12

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Overview of the Draft Social Plan for Regeneration Overview of the Social Plan for Regeneration

The Social Plan for the East Sligo Regeneration Project is a crucial element of the Regeneration Masterplan and is designed to work closely with the physical and economic elements of the Masterplan. The vision that shapes the Social Plan is one of a community that is resilient and that is primed to seize opportunities as they arise. The overarching goals are to: • Enable resilience within the communities of the regeneration area such that local people are better able to manage and respond to issues in their own local area whether economic, social or environmental.

• Resource the communities of the regeneration area such that local people can avail of these opportunities that arise as part of the regeneration process in the changing economic context at a national level; • Stimulate the communities of the regeneration area such that local people have the capabilities to lead the sort of lives that they value and enjoy.

The Social Plan builds on the Stage 1 report, Building on our past....looking to our future and seeks to identify ways to address the issues highlighted. The development of the Social Plan was informed by eleven workshops that examined and made proposals in relation to each of the key strategic areas that make up the plan. The workshops were attended by over 150 representatives of statutory and community agencies and organisations and community representatives.

The first draft social plan strategies and actions were reviewed by the Social Plan Reference Group and subsequently revised. The reference group brought together representatives of key statutory and voluntary agencies and local community organisations to assess the proposals and to make recommendations for their further development as necessary. Submissions on the draft plan were also received and incorporated where appropriate. This provided an important endorsement for the strategies and actions set out below.

The Social Plan sets out strategies, objectives and action in seven thematic intervention areas and is supported by three underpinning strategies: The seven thematic interventions are:

The three underpinning strategies are:

• • • • • • • •

• • •

Education and Learning Unemployment, Training & the Social Economy Health & Wellbeing Family Support Community Safety and Housing Management Sport and Recreation Income Adequacy

Community Development and Youth Work Inter-Agency Collaboration and Engagement Arts and Culture

The Social Plan is underpinned by a section on implementation, as well as monitoring and review. Implementation of the Social Plan will take a combination of interagency structures, including the establishment of an Oversight Committee at the highest level, and will involve the key agencies and organisations in Sligo, including the regeneration community representative organisations.

The draft Social Plan is outlined in full in a separate report.

Public Exhibition

Public Exhibition

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 13

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Overview of the Draft Economic Plan for Regeneration Overview of the Economic Plan for Regeneration

The Economic Plan for the East Sligo Regeneration Project is a crucial element of the Regeneration Masterplan and is designed to work closely with the physical and social elements of the Masterplan.

The aim of the Economic Plan is to enhance employment and economic development in the regeneration area.

In developing the Economic Plan, the Design Team initially undertook a review of relevant literature and other regeneration projects. A series of bi-lateral meetings were conducted with a range of agencies, culminating in a Consultation Roundtable for the relevant agencies and community representatives.

The Economic Plan sets out a series of strategies, objectives and actions in the following areas: • • •

Private Sector Employment Local Enterprise Development Incentivising Investment in the Area

• •

Public Procurement & Social Benefit Perception

The Economic Plan is underpinned by a section on implementation, as well as monitoring and review. Implementation of the Economic Plan will take a combination of interagency structures, including the establishment of an Oversight Committee at the highest level, and will involve the key agencies and organisations in Sligo, including the regeneration community representative organisations.

Economic Plan workshop September 2014

Successful implementation of the Social and Economic Plans requires an interdepartmental approach to regeneration at government level, including the funding of social, economic and physical regeneration strategies, identified by the Masterplan Team and the mandate from parent departments to agencies to prioritise strategies in regeneration areas at local level.

At local level it will require: • Investment – this needs to add value to interventions that are already targeted at the area; • Flexibility – in the ways that agencies deliver programmes and in the way that agencies work together; • Prioritisation – areas of regeneration that have significant levels of disadvantage must be given priority when it comes to interventions; • Responsiveness – in order to ensure community buy-in strategies and interventions need to respond to the community identified need; The draft Economic Plan is outlined in full in a separate report.

Economic Plan workshop September 2014

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 14

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Photographs of Exhibition 14th July - 21st July 2014 : Sligo Project School

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 15

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Photographs of Walkabout 14th July 2014

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 16

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition of Regeneration Ideas Presented Between 14th and 21st July 2014

Model of Regeneration Area, view looking north east

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 17

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 18

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 19

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 20

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Regeneration Social Plan Why Regeneration?

The regeneration area is now of significant disadvantage: • Education levels are poor • The unemployment rate is over twice the national average; • Where people are in employment, it tends to be in low-­‐skilled areas; • The number of lone parent households is 40% compared to 18% in the State.

Why Regeneration?

• The proportion of those unable to work due to permanent sickness of disability is 8% in the The regeneration is now of significant disadvantage: Source 2011 Census area regeneration area, double that of the State (4%).

• Education levels are poor • The unemployment rate is over twice the national average; • Where people are in employment, it tends to be in low-­‐skilled areas; • The number of lone parent households is 40% compared to 18% in the State.

EducaKon • The proportion of those unable to work due to permanent sickness of disability is 8% in the 35.0% regeneration area, double that of the State (4%).

30.0%

Why Regeneration?

The regeneration area is an area of significant disadvantage. The 2011 census showed that: • Education levels are poor • The unemployment rate is over twice the national average • Where people are in employment, it tends to be in low-skilled areas • The number of lone parent households is 40% compared to 18% in the State • The proportion of those unable to work due to permanent sickness of disability is 8% in the regeneration area, double that of the State (4%)

25.0% 20.0%

EducaKon

15.0%

35.0% 10.0% 30.0% 5.0% 0.0% 25.0%

20.0% RegeneraKon Area 15.0% Sligo Borough 10.0% Co Sligo 5.0% State 0.0% RegeneraKon Area

High EducaKon

29.2%

14.1%

17.7%

29.5%

16.6%

30.0%

16.0%

30.6%

Low educaKon

High EducaKon

29.2%

14.1%

Labour Force 17.7%

Sligo Borough Co Sligo

70

State

Low educaKon

60

30.0%

16.0%

30.6%

20 70 10 60 0 50 RegeneraKon A40 rea

The Social Plan element of the Regeneration Masterplan sets out a number of strategies to address the needs identified in the Stage 1

report, Building on our past… ‘Looking to our future’

Labour Force ParKcipaKon Rate (%)

Unemployment Rate (%)

59.2

37.6

Sligo Borough 30

54.6

23.6

Co Sligo

20

59.4

18.1

State

10

61.9

19

0

Labour Force

30

What is a Social Plan?

29.5%

16.6%

50 40

Labour Force ParKcipaKon Rate (%)

Unemployment Rate (%)

RegeneraKon Area

59.2

37.6

Sligo Borough

54.6

23.6

Co Sligo

59.4

18.1

State

61.9

19

Children & Children & Young PYoiung eople People

Lifecycle Approach, Themes & Underpinning Strategies

Communi7es

This plan is based on a lifecycle approach. Its implementation involves a focus on children/young people, people of working age and older people. This framework enables an integration of initiative !to address disadvantages experienced by the people in the regeneration area.

The plan has seven themes and three underpinning strategies.

Communi7es

!

Lone Parent Families

RegeneraKon Area

40.1

Sligo Borough

25.3

Co Sligo

17.4

State

18.3

What is a Social Plan?

The Social Plan element of the Regeneration Masterplan sets out a number of strategies to address the needs identified in the Stage 1 report, Building on our past…Looking to our future.

What are we trying to achieve?

The vision that shapes this social regeneration plan is one of a community that is resilient, that is primed to seize opportunities as they arise and that is flourishing: • Enable resilience within the communities of the regeneration area such that local people are better able to manage and respond to external shocks to their local area whether economic, social or environmental.

• Resource the communities of the regeneration area such that local people can avail of opportunities that arise as part of the regeneration process, that emerge with the implementation of this plan, and that develop due to the changing economic context at a national level.

• Stimulate a flourishing within the communities of the regeneration area such that local people have the capabilities to lead the sort of lives that they have reason to value.

Older People

Lifecycle Approach

Vision—what are we trying to achieve?

Lone Parents

Working Ag

Older People

!

45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

People of People of Working Age

The vision that shapes this social regeneration plan is one of a community that is resilient, that is primed to seize opportunities as they arise and that is flourishing: • Enable resilience within the communities of the regeneration area such that local people are better able to manage and respond to issues in their local area whether economic, social or environmental • Resource the communities of the regeneration area such that local people can avail of opportunities that arise as part of the regeneration process in the changing economic context at a national level • Stimulate a flourishing within the communities of the regeneration area such that local people have the capabilities to lead the sort of lives that they value and enjoy

Vision

Factors for Success

The Social Regeneration Plan requires commitment from public agencies and other relevant agencies if it is to be successful. This commitment needs to encompass:

Investment – The state, public and other relevant agencies will need to channel resources into the regeneration area and its communities in order to add value to interventions that are already targeted at the area and to ensure the goals of the social regeneration plan can be met Flexibility – The state, public and other relevant agencies need to introduce flexibilities in the ways that they design and deliver programmes and in the way that they work together if the complex needs of the regeneration area are to be effectively addressed Prioritisation – Public and other relevant agencies need to prioritise the regeneration area with interventions given the significant levels of disadvantage in the area Responsiveness – Public and other relevant agencies need to visibly respond to community identified needs with relevant strategies and interventions in order to ensure community buy-in to the regeneration

DMOD

Arup

Ciaran Murray

Date issued: February 2015

Mulcahy McDonagh & Partners

Metropolitan Workshop

Mitchell + Associates

Stage 3

Stephen Little & Associates

Ann Irwin & Niall Crowley

Bernard Williams and Associates

Page 21

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Regeneration Social Plan Themes and Key Actions Education & Learning

• • •

• • •

•

Unemployment, Training & the Social Economy

Supporting learning and socialisation in the very early years Supporting children in primary school Retaining children in school by addressing issues that lead to early school leaving Supporting parents as primary educators Improve access to higher and further education Develop and implement a series of lifelong learning, adult education and training initiatives Ensure that the physical requirements for education and learning are addressed

•

•

•

•

•

Establish foundations for the Unemployment, Training, and Social Economy Strategy Secure employment opportunities for local people in the work of physical regeneration within the area Develop and secure routes to employment for people in the regeneration area – Activation Develop and secure routes to employment for people in the regeneration area – Training Develop and secure routes to employment for people in the regeneration area – Social Economy

Health & Wellbeing

• •

•

•

Family Support

Improve the health and wellbeing of residents in the regeneration area.

Improve mental health outcomes across the lifecycle for people in the regeneration area Improve access to appropriate services and early intervention for those in the regeneration area currently experiencing health related difficulties Improve the range and availability of primary health care services in the regeneration area

•

• •

Improve the prospects for families at risk in the regeneration area, with an emphasis on improving outcomes for children Maintaining and expanding current family support services Ensure that the needs of particularly vulnerable sections of the community are met

Community Safety & Housing Management • • • •

•

•

Sport & Recreation

Address anti-social and illegal behaviour Prevent illegal and antisocial behaviour Ensure that the current Housing Management team remains in place Implement initiatives so that there is a faster turn-around of vacant properties and so that the community has an appropriate involvement Support the development of initiatives to facilitate downsizing of properties by tenants Support for residents’ associations to develop and to participate in housing management

•

•

•

Maintain and further develop opportunities for participation in regular exercise for all members of the community Support and expand a local capacity in relation to the provision of sports and recreation Maintain and further develop new and existing local facilities, amenities, clubs and school links to provide an adequate infrastructure for sports and recreation in the area

Income Adequacy

•

•

•

Support the take-up of welfare payments and ensure that people in the regeneration area are aware of and avail of their entitlements Review and develop flexibilities and income disregards in social welfare payments Develop initiatives to combat illegal money lending, support households in debt and provide alternative access to credit and to budgetary advice

Underpinning Strategies Community Development & Youth Work • • • • • • •

Inter-Agency Collaboration & Partnership

Embed and build on the conditions for effective community development in the regeneration area Ensure an active, engaged and empowered community in the regeneration area Ensure that all communities in the regeneration area are organised and represented Ensure that communities are engaged in decisions that affect their lives Embed and build on the conditions for effective youth work in the regeneration area Develop and implement effective and innovative responses to the needs of young people in the regeneration area Ensure the voice of young people is heard and to ensure the participation of young people in the regeneration project

• • •

Arts & Culture

Secure long-term commitment to and engagement with the regeneration process from key public sector bodies and other agencies Find ways for better cooperation between agencies involved in regeneration and the community Develop ways to mainstream a focus on the regeneration area within public sector bodies and other agencies, for effective targeting of the regeneration area by these organisations, supporting adaptability, innovation and flexibility in the provision of services and programmes in the regeneration area

• • • • •

Build foundations for a long-term Arts and Culture Strategy in the regeneration area Develop diverse experiential forms of arts education through all sectors of the community Provide opportunities for local people to access arts and culture provision in Sligo city and county Develop and implement a programme of community arts provision and practice Integrate an arts and culture dimension into all elements of the social regeneration plan

Key Actions Education & Learning

Unemployment, Training & the Social Economy

• Sligo Regeneration Education & Learning Project will be established • Homework support • Improved childcare • Literacy & numeracy programmes • Anti-bullying programmes • Access to higher & further education • Space for play and learning

• An Employment & Enterprise Support Officer will be employed • Enterprise facility established • Develop skills the community to take advantage of job opportunities • Develop social economy enterprises

DMOD

Arup

Ciaran Murray

Date issued: February 2015

Health & Wellbeing

• Supports to improve health • Improved health services in the community

Mulcahy McDonagh & Partners

Family Support

• Focus on families with complex needs • Parenting support – particularly very young parents • Supports for older people and carers • Supports for asylum seekers

Metropolitan Workshop

Community Safety & Housing Management • Maintain • Community Gardaí • and Community • Wardens • Reporting illegal activity • Address illegal activity • Support for tenants • Support for residents associations • Sport & recreation • Sports & recreation for all ages • Facilities expanded and developed

Mitchell + Associates

Stage 3

Income Adequacy

Community Development & Youth Work

Welfare rights Address illegal moneylending Support for budgeting

•

• •

Community Workers and Youth Workers working with the community and young people A youth café Capacity building for local groups

Stephen Little & Associates

Arts & Culture

• •

Developing a sense of place through arts Arts & cultural activities embedded in the regeneration area

Ann Irwin & Niall Crowley

Interagency Collaboration & Engagement

•

Agencies working together to prioritise the regeneration area

Bernard Williams and Associates

Page 22

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Regeneration Economic Plan The aim of the Economic Plan is to enhance employment and economic development in the regeneration area.

It will interact with the Social and Physical elements of the Regeneration Masterplan.

Economic development in the regeneration area is an integral part of the economic development of Sligo

Text for see saws: We will be working from the perspectives:

We will be working from the perspectives:

The Economic Plan will initiate and strengthen measures to: • Develop the local economy including micro enterprise, social enterprise and community enterprise.

• Change external perceptions of the Regeneration Area and perceptions about entrepreneurship within the Regeneration Area.

• Enhance the employability of people in the regeneration area.

• Stimulate inward investment into the regeneration area.

• Engage the private sector in providing employment for people in the regeneration area.

• Stimulate a package of Corporate Social Responsibility measures within the private sector that support employment and economic development in the regeneration area.

• Develop social objectives within public procurement strategies that target employment and economic development in the regeneration area.

Economic Development

Ideas for enhancing employment and economic development Local Economy

Private Sector

• Develop supports, including training, mentoring and funding for micro enterprise start-ups and self-employment.

• Take steps to enable people from the regeneration area to compete for new jobs in new developments in precision engineering and tourism in and beyond the regeneration area.

• Spin off opportunities from tourism development in Boathouse Quay and the Lodge could be considered.

• Assess and develop community enterprise and social enterprise to respond to local needs and opportunities.

Opportunities in an urban farm, community gardens, and a laundrette could be considered.

• Providing training linked to potential enterprise development in or outside the regeneration area.

Employability

Inward Investment

• Develop training workshop space in the regeneration area.

• Marketing & packaging of available sites in the regeneration area.

• Training to support skills acquisition with a model that focuses on linking training to potential enterprise development in or outside the regeneration area.

• Development of incentives (low rent & rates) to attract commercial interests.

• Look at ways to help promote existing local businesses in the area.

Perceptions

Corporate Social Responsibility

Public Procurement

• Challenge perceptions of the regeneration area.

• Develop Corporate Social Responsibility projects to support employment and economic development in the regeneration and work with private sector companies to focus their CSR on the regeneration area.

• Explore ways that the social clauses within public procurement processes can be maximised to benefit the regeneration area and support appropriate procurement strategies in this regard.

• Promote the regeneration area as a creative hub to agencies supporting economic development.

• Promote potential in entrepreneurship and the supports for entrepreneurship to people in the regeneration area.

If you have any ideas, we would like to hear them too ........

DMOD

Arup

Ciaran Murray

Date issued: February 2015

Mulcahy McDonagh & Partners

Metropolitan Workshop

Mitchell + Associates

Stage 3

Stephen Little & Associates

Ann Irwin & Niall Crowley

Bernard Williams and Associates

Page 23

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 24

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 25

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 26

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 27

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 28

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Cranmore Masterplan | Transport and Mobility Key Principles Increase the Permeability of Cranmore for Pedestrians and Cyclists Enhance the Accessibility to Education, Health, Employment, Shopping and Leisure Raise the Visibility of Cranmore by encouraging multi-modal movement through the estate.

Improve the Quality of Public Spaces, such as streets.

The traffic flows, especially within Cranmore, are not significant. Localised congestion problems are likely to be a result of the capacity of specific arms at key junctions and occur for short periods of time. All roads to the east of Pearse Road and St. Anne’s have less than 500 two-way hourly vehicles recorded on both peak periods. The percentage of HGVs along the roads is what would be expected at less than 5% of total traffic volumes during the peak hours. There are a number of barriers to pedestrian movements in the area such as the Garvoge River to the north, the racecourse to the east, the cemetery and the general urban layout in the area.

St. Anne’s Tce.

St. Anne’s Tce.

Existing Situation Cranmore Drive (near Lidl) 3% HGVs

Devins Drive 1% HGVs

Cleveragh Drive 4% HGVs Pearse Road

Pearse Road

ing Peak Traffic Volumes (2-way) Less than 200 (less than 4 per minute)

Main barriers to pedestrian movements Pedestrian connectivity (along vehicular routes)

Pearse Road 2% HGVs

Pedestrianonly links)

Between 200 and 500

Cemetery Road 3% HGVs

Between 500 and 1,000

The mode share for each of the modes may be slightly higher as 14% of respondents didn’t state their means of travel.

The high walk mode share can be seen as a positive, sustainable outcome of the proximity of Cranmore to the city centre and the compact nature of the Sligo urban area.

However, the poor bus service and the low car ownership are also elements that limit mode choice, and in some way, can be seen as negative from a social viewpoint.

Car Passenger 15%

Other 3%

Not Stated 14%

Junctions surveyed

Pedestrian Barriers

Existing Traffic Volumes

Car Driver 27%

Walk 36%

More than 1,000

– Present Traffic Context (Morning Peak)

The modal splits for the Cranmore area have been analysed from the 2011 Census. Walking has the highest mode share with 35% followed by car driver (26%) and car passenger (15%). Both cycling (3%) and bus use (2%) are very low.

Bus, minibus or coach 2%

Bicycle 3%

Mode Split

1

Masterplan Proposal Walk Distance from Abbey Quarter Centre

Legend

30 mins

Existing links

15 mins

New or improved links Sligo Harbour

Potential new links

Town Centre

Sligo Institute of Technology

Finisklin Business Park

Hospital Civic Offices Cleveragh Business Park

Schools

Cranmore Road Carraroe Retail Park

1

N

ESB

Cran

more

Lane

Government Offices s Driv

e

Cranmore Place

It is suggested that the junction of Devins Drive and Cranmore Road is treated as a gateway to Cranmore, and through careful redesign, provides a more attractive environment for pedestrians and cyclists.

The concept is based on the acknowledgement that this is an important node within the wider area, and that it vulnerable roads users are presently poorly catered for.

The uncertainty regarding the impact that the bridge will have on this particular junction has lead us to illustrate two concepts for this junction: One that improves the junction by reallocating road space to pedestrians and is based on the present traffic volumes; and another that takes account of an increase in traffic volumes as a result of the new bridge.

The Masterplan proposals related to road and traffic management take cognisance of the need to open Cranmore to the wider Sligo, and also accommodating the vehicular movement patterns changes likely to arise from the new bridge. The most relevant changes to the road network are proposed through the implementation of new road links between Cranmore and Chapel Hill, as well as by the new road network associated with the development of Browns Field that will connect Cranmore Road in the north to the eastern side of Cranmore estate, and to Cleveragh Road, via Devins Drive.

New Bridge

Legend Existing links Upgraded links New links

Proposed Road Network

Accessibility toFuture Employment Opportunities Pedestrian Accessibility

McSharry Park Sports Ground

City Centre

N

McSharry Park Sports Ground

The former remains a priority junction, albeit with improved pedestrian facilities, and the latter is proposed as a signalised junction with rightturning pockets to ensure adequate junction operations.

ESB Cran

more

Lane

Government Offices s Driv e

Proposed Pedestrian/ Cycle Network

(Dunnes, Aldi, Lidl, Exchange Hall)

The focus of the Masterplan on improving the pedestrian connectivity of Cranmore is clearly reflected on the wider reach of the 5, 10 and 15 minute walk catchments. Of particular relevance is the proposed bridge, which will open and new connection to the north side of Sligo, clearly illustrated in the contours. In addition to the bridge, the most relevant pedestrian infrastructure improvements are related to the new and improved links to the west at Mercy Green and at between Joe McDonnell Drive and Chapel Hill. The latter is a key component of the newly enhanced pedestrian axis that will lead from the city centre to the east, via the new development at the centre of Cranmore, and improved pedestrian routes through the racecourse as far as the Leisure Centre and Cleveragh Park. The Lough Gill proposes creating Masterplan also new local connections between Cranmore Place and Cranmore Road, as well as through Browns Field as part of new development.

Cranmore Place

Devins Dr/Cranmore Rd Junction (signalised junction)

Devin

Devin

Devins Dr/Cranmore Rd Junction (priority junction)

Football Pitch

Football Pitch Lidl Priority Junction Layout Scale: 1:500 @ A4

a

b d

c

e f

g

h

The masterplan proposals for Cranmore will be reflected on a significantly improved movement network, with a strong focus on pedestrian and cycle linkages. The diagram opposite concentrates on the proposals for the central Cranmore area and its linkages with Sligo city centre.

The main interventions area as follows: a) A new movement node around the proposed Mercy Green, providing a gateway to Cranmore from the west, as well as enhancing the connectivity and attractiveness of the top of Chapel Hill and Mercy School. b) A new connection between Devins Drive and the Mercy Green achieved through the extension of Geldof Drive. This is proposed to be a traffic calmed environment to discourage unnecessary car movements, while providing an attractive environment for pedestrians and cyclists along this key new link to the school and the city centre. c) An improved connection between Joe McDonnell Drive and the Mercy Green, further enhancing the openness of this new urban space. For the reasons described above, this will be a traffic calmed link, with priority given to pedestrians and cyclists. d) Improvements to the existing Devins Drive, especially through landscaping and provision of pedestrian crossing facilities at key locations. The nature of these pedestrian crossing facilities can range from zebra crossings to signalised pedestrian-activated facilities (push-button), and will need to be assessed in light of the impact of the new bridge. e) Improved pedestrian facilities along McNeill Drive, associated with the new neighbourhood proposals for the central cleared site. f) New linkages associated with the proposals for the central cleared site, which will include a new street between Langan Drive and Devins Drive. This will form part of a key pedestrian and cycle connection between the city centre and Cleveragh Park, via the racecourse. g) New improved pedestrian facilities to the racecourse and to the proposed neighbourhood on Browns Field. h) New pedestrian and cycle connection between the top of Devins Drive and Langan Drive. This facility will be integrated with the active open space proposals for this area, and will play an important role on the attractiveness and active usage of this area by all.

Mercy Green Proposals DMOD

Date issued: February 2015

Lidl The suite of schemes proposed will be influential in opening Cranmore to the rest of Sligo, which is considered to be of great benefit to the population as it will reduce travel distances to education, health, employment, retail and leisure. The main new or improved connections will be those to:

Signal Junction Layout Scale: 1:500 @ A4

City Centre

- The city centre and schools to the west; - Cleveragh Park and the leisure centre to the east; and - Hospital, Sligo IT to the north.

CRANMORE

Leisure Centre Cleveragh Park

Main Connectivity Arup

Ciaran Murray

Mulcahy McDonagh & Partnetrs

Metropolitan Workshop

Stage 3

Michetll + Associates

Stephen Little & Associates

Ann Irwin & Niall Crowley

Bernard Williams and Associates

Page 29

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Cranmore Masterplan | Sustainable Energy What is Sustainable Energy?

We all know what energy is; it’s the electricity in our sockets, warmth in our radiators and fuel that makes our cars able to take us from one place to another. But what is sustainability?

Sustainability simply means ensuring our children and grandchildren can enjoy the same energy without damaging their environment. Instead of being dependant on lots of coal and oil (fossil fuels), we can create a new system that can keep homes warm using less or no fossil fuels.

Sustainability also means keeping the air we breathe clean, to make sure we don’t get ill from burning fossil fuels our homes. It is making sure that we think about what is best both now and in the future when making decisions.

What have we looked at?

To improve the homes in Cranmore, both now and in the future, we have looked at different technologies that can provide hot water for our taps and showers as well as heat for the radiators, in a way that makes us all less dependent on fossil fuels which are likely to increase in price in years to come.

Similar to the way we heat our homes from different fuel sources, be it from electricity, coal or oil, a district heating system at Cranmore could be powered from different sources and technologies. Therefore we have also looked at different ways we can make hot water in the heating plant to be sent out in the pipes.

Individual Household Sustainable Energy Solutions 1

Install a solar panel to heat water Along with an oil boiler we could install a solar panel on the roof to heat the water in your homes. On the negative side we would still have to get oil for the boiler if there is not enough sun.

On the positive side we would need less oil than normal.

2

Install a pump that can create heat from the air outside The pump is a machine that uses electricity to take the air from outside your house and make it warmer to provide heating and hot water for the house, like a refrigerator working backwards. This will make sure that we do not need fossil fuels, but it can sometimes be a bit noisy.

Install a biomass boiler in each home We could put in a new boiler that uses wood often pressed into pellets. This would be good as we would not need fossil fuels, but the boilers are bigger and we need space to keep the wood.

1

Install an engine that can create electricity and heat This is known as a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) engine. It uses the heat that is normally wasted when electricity is made, to heat the water in the water pipes delivering the heat to our homes. It can use different fuels such as biomass, oil, coal, gas or even rubbish from our bins. This is good because it’s a 2-in-1 technology using 1 unit of fuel to make both heat and electricity. It may be more expensive to build, but cheaper to run than a normal oil boiler, when thinking of all the costs that you would normally have over 10-15 years.

2

Install a large pump to create heat at the plant This is very similar to that explained earlier, where we can use the outside air to create heat for our homes. This time it is a much bigger machine that can create enough heat for the whole area, using the heat from the ground we walk on or even the water in the Garvonge River. This alsomay be more expensive to build, but cheaper to run than a normal oil boiler, when thinking of all the costs that you would normally have over 10-15 years.

http://energyshare.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/biomass-heating-diagram.png

http://www.viridiansolar.co.uk/Products_Solar_for_Housing.htm

3

Neighbournood Network Sustainable Energy Solutions

4

Instead of having a boiler or pump in each house in Cranmore we have thought about building a system where the heat is made in a central location on the estate and then transported to every house by putting hot water pipes in the ground. This is called a district heating network.

http://www.biomassinnovation.ca/CombinedHeatAndPower.html

3

http://www.local.gov.uk/climate-change/-/journal_content/56/10180/3510396/ARTICLE

Install a large biomass boiler This is the same technology as with the smaller boilers for each home, just with a bigger boiler to create enough heat for everyone. It is practical as this means that each house does not need the space to store the woodchips to be burned in the boiler. Also this means that we would not need oil or coal, but small wood pieces that can be collected from around Ireland.

http://www.linn-energy.co.uk/district-energy/how-district-energy-works.html

http://www.willmarkenergy.co.uk/heat-pumps.html

Recommendations

http://www.local.gov.uk/climate-change/-/journal_content/56/10180/3510396/ARTICLE

All the above technologies look at improving the supply of energy to Cranmore, this is something that takes some years to develop and design as funding is not freely available at the moment.

While further developing and designing the possibilities for delivering heat, we can still look at ensuring the need for energy is decreased by making small changes to our homes. By improving insulation of the walls and ceilings and putting in new double glazed windows, we can reduce the need for heating.

DMOD

Date issued: February 2015

Arup

Ciaran Murray

Mulcahy McDonagh & Partnetrs

Metropolitan Workshop

Stage 3

Michetll + Associates

Stephen Little & Associates

Ann Irwin & Niall Crowley

Bernard Williams and Associates

Page 30

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 31

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 32

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 33

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: On display 14th - 21st July : Sligo School Project

Next Steps Next Steps Your feedback and comments will be incorporated in the Stage 3 Report, which will be submitted to the DoECLG. There are challenges going forward: •

There is no guarantee of funding, finding sources of funding may be a challenge, funding for complex projects may require interdepartmental funding.

•

Uncertainty in relation to public finance

•

Time frames for regeneration are long term - maintaining the support of the community whilst also managing expectations.

These will be some of the challenges ahead.

In Stage 4 the Plan will be refined to produce a long term vision for the area. This will be put on public display. We will be working on an implementation strategy to make the Regeneration Masterplan happen.

Thank you for visiting the Exhibition Consultations

Consultations

STAGE 3 : 12 weeks A

M

J

J

DMOD

Ciaran Murray

Date issued: February 2015

Exhibition

STAGE 4 : 14 weeks A

S

O

N

Mulcahy McDonagh & Partners

Metropolitan Workshop

Mitchell + Associates

Stage 3

STAGE 5 : 10 weeks

D

J 2014

WE ARE HERE Arup

Exhibition

F

M

A

M

J

2015 Stephen Little & Associates

Ann Irwin & Niall Crowley

Bernard Williams and Associates

Page 34

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Material: Central Map

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 35

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

KEY TO CENTRAL MAP: Regeneration Masterplan Ideas Each idea was numbered and marked with a flag on the Table Map Improving Access To Quality Amenities And Open Spaces UD 01 Play Areas: Several sites are identified: Why? Residents identified absence of structured play space for all ages.

UD 02 Easy Access to Regional Sports Centre and Cleveragh: Racecourse Cross Route: gated access to new path to Sports Centre and Regional Park.

Why? Residents suggested a formal gate. The Plan proposes a safe and more direct pedestrian and cycle access to Sports Centre and the pitches in Regional Park.

UD 03 Create quality open spaces within Cranmore area.

• Linking Green space with Yeats Drive Mound and Part of Carroll Drive. Extinguished: New all weather pitch and outdoor play spaces (overlooked by a new Abbeyquarter building) will create a series of quality open spaces.

• Reducing mound to John Fallon/Joe Mc Donnell Drive: will provide quality passive open space.

Why? Residents expressed need for new play spaces for all ages. The mounds create a negative impression of the area.

UD 04 Exercise Trail: extend the existing Doorly Park trail through the Racecourse, New Avenue, Mercy Green and Chapel Hill.

Why? Makes a good exercise trail loop and brings new profile to Cranmore.

UD 05 River Front Jetty and Pavilion:

At Doorly Park and at Boat House Quay, used by rowers.

Why? Encourages more people to enjoy the River and provides changing facilities for water sports.

Promoting Historical Assets In The Area UD 06 Brown’s Field Developments: new mixed use sites with vehicle link from Cranmore Road to Racecourse View:

Woodlands and walls of Carnsfoot House would be preserved.

Why? It is a hidden asset to be enjoyed, reflecting history of the area.

UD 07 The Gaol: is a Conservation Asset and could become an Art/Visitor Centre.

Why? It is a hidden asset and potentially a visitor destination attraction.

Providing Quality Spaces For Community Facilities UD 08 Medical Facility: suggested location is Central Cleared Site.

Why? Much needed facility identified by residents as a priority to serve Sligo East City.. Devins Drive location gives it a good profile and walkable for residents.

UD 09a New Abbey Quarter Centre: replacement proposed on Central Cleared site.( Upgrade of existing Abbey Quarter Centre would require extensive work and disrupt use of the centre and be a short term fix ) New all weather pitch with new Abbey Quarter Centre community building to oversee the outdoor play spaces creating a series of quality open spaces Why? Residents identified need for new space for clubs, training, and family support. Proposal illustrates combining those uses with outdoor spaces so all can be managed as one facility.

UD 09b Abbey Quarter Centre Site: If new facility is built, site will liberated for housing Why? Residents emphasise the existing Centre is outdated, needs a lift and access to appropriate outdoor spaces and parking is inadequate. Need identified for new rooms for clubs, training, and family support. Sale of site helps fund new Centre and delivers more diverse housing mix.

UD 10 Lodge: Public owned building could be used as community/information centre/cafe.

Why? It is on the river front trail at a good stopping point; could complement a pleasure boat jetty. Awaits a viable use, needs to be pursued with a management group to lead its development. Community has identified the need for a community room.

Improving Quality Of The Roads, Streets And Urban Spaces UD 11 St Anne’s Place Landscape: new tree planting here and along Cranmore Road.

Why? To make this place and link to the East more attractive without losing much parking.

UD 12 Devins Drive Improvements: landscaped as an Avenue and new traffic light controlled crossing.

Why? Residents suggested tree planting to reduce bleakness of street and asked for safer and easier places to cross.

UD 13 Cranmore Road Improved ESB Frontage Enhanced: new planting and pavement treatment.

Why? Residents wanted pavement to be wider and more attractive to use.

Ray McSharry Park Boundary Wall: replace with railings and widen pavement.

Why? Residents requested a better safer footpath. This is a hidden open space so railings would make walking past pleasurable rather than alienating.

UD 14 Cemetery Car Park: access off lay-by to small car park on pitch area so cemetery expansion is possible also.

Why? Mourners parking causes traffic congestion and parking on busy road for funerals is undignified.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 36

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving access and links UD 15 New Link via Mercy lands to Chapel Hill and town: New link from Devins and Geldof Drive to Chapel Hill. This

requires a land swap with the School and replacement of Sean Fallon pitch (as already planned) on Cleveragh Regional Park site with new changing rooms. The existing school boundary wall would be replaced with more attractive railings.

School drop and collect arrangements will be made easier.

Why? Residents identified need for better access to the School and Gym. The Plan shows a safe route for children and direct access to the School and to the City beyond. The new connections to Chapel Hill will provide pedestrian, cycle and one-way vehicle access.

UD 16 New Road Link: Joe Mc Donnell to Chapel Hill and Town. New wide cycle/path street from Joe McDonnell Drive to Chapel Hill. To achieve this Link would require acquisition and removal of 4 houses.

Why? To make better connections between Joe Mc Donnell Drive and town, providing a safe direct route.

UD 17 New link through Browns Field, providing good access to facilities such as Sligo I.T., Regional Hospital via future new bridge. Opening up lands within Browns Field area and providing good connections to facilities.

Why? To provide better connections between Cranmore and facilities such as the IT and Hospital.

UD 18 New Avenue Link, through the Centre Block site linking Devins Drive to Brown’s Field via Racecourse View.

Why? To make better connections for the whole area.

UD 19 Gaol to Cranmore Road Link: a missing connection that if overlooked would be a safe and useful pedestrian link to the River.

Why? New connection, like the Aldi link, would attract footfall especially if Gaol becomes a visitor attraction.

UD 20 Garavogue Villas Access: restriction signs.

Why? Residents asked for ways to keep out misrouted trucks.

Getting The Most Potential Out Of The Vacant And Potential Sites In The Area UD 21 Redeveloping Mercy Lands: a new green space with play area at the top of Chapel Hill, opportunity for new

housing site.

Why? Makes an attractive urban place for existing and new residents and provide better spaces for school drop and facilities. Would help to change perceptions of the area.

UD 22 Cranmore Road Cleared Site: new residential (apartments) with open space, overlooking pedestrian link to Cranmore Place.

Why? Convenient central city site with good access to amenities, ideal for small apartments.

UD 23 Brown’s Field Developments: new mixed use sites with vehicle link from Cranmore Road to Racecourse View.

Woodlands and walls of Carnsfoot House would be preserved. Copse could provide a space for adventure play. Mixed uses could include employment, civic facilities, education and residential.

Why? Publicly owned land asset that needs market interest to fund development. New links created to Racecourse and to future developments behind Aldi and on Business Park Sites, including Site at back of Lidl: mixed use potential.

Why? To provide opportunities and good connections for residents in the area.

UD 24 Former Maisonettes Site: this is zoned as Existing Residential , we are suggesting that this is the best use of this site.

Why? Centrally located publicly owned residential land is a long term asset for the City and community, provides a great location for residential use, with easy access to quality facilities such as Doorly Park, and Garavogue river.

UD 25 Centre Block Site: a new location for residential, community and medical facilities, and with quality open space. Carroll Drive Extinguished: surface removed so amenity space of Cleared Site and East Mound make one quality open space.

Why? Residents spoke of need for a new centre, for medical facilities and for new play spaces for all ages. New all weather pitch works well on corner with Devins Drive and mounds provide banked seating. A good location for a community resource. New Abbeyquarter location oversees the outdoor play spaces. Housing need is documented also in the Stage 2 Report.

UD 26 Development Site East of Globe House: could be useful for Mercy School expansion.

Why? If Mercy Link Rd went ahead School facilities will need to expand so additional land could be acquired.

UD 27 Cleveragh Drive Re-Zoning: proposed that next Development Plan rezones these sites to

Residential .

Why? With Racecourse and Doorly and Cleveragh Regional Park now attractive destinations, the lands lend themselves to Residential Use (R2 Low/Medium Density) and should be developed in preference to out-of-town commercial sites.

Exploring Options For Sustainable Energy UD 28 Racecourse - Central Site: a recreation use and/or energy farm.

Why? Vacant land publicly owned and with new links it is more accessible. Potential for Ground Source Heat Pump scheme to provide a sustainable energy resource.

Improving Housing Quality And Opportunity In The Area UD 29 Collery Alley: Close Collery alley with new housing. Has an impact for existing elderly residents: would need new sheltered housing opportunities, possibly in redevelopment of centre block site.

Why? To extinguish a difficult to manage alley and to provide new housing to meet needs.

UD 30 Housing improvements : focusing on energy efficiency for Cranmore Estate: see Stage 3 Housing Report.

UD 31 Housing environmental improvements : focusing on Cranmore Estate: see Stage 3 Urban Design Report.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 37

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback from Public Exhibition

Model of Regeneration Area, view looking north east

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 38

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exhibition Signed in Attendance and Public Questionnaire Responses by Area

335 people attended 205 questionnaires were returned, over 660 comments made

No of Attendees 18 No of Questionnaires 9 No of Comments 28 No of Attendees 36 No of Questionnaires 30 No of Comments 57

No of Attendees 128 No of Questionnaires 84 No of Comments 264

No of Attendees 135 No of Questionnaires 75 No of Comments 278

Date issued: February 2015

No of Attendees 18 No of Questionnaires 7 No of Comments 37

Stage 3

Page 39

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Questionnaire Feedback Regeneration Masterplan Ideas Format of Questionnaire

STAGE 3 MASTERPLAN IDEAS: EXHIBITION SLIGO SCHOOL PROJECT th th JULY 14 -­‐19 2014

Everyone who attended the Exhibition of Regeneration Masterplan Ideas was handed a feedback Questionnaire to gather responses to the Ideas on Display. Each question described the idea, and the reason why it was being proposed. Over 35 questions were asked, under the nine theme headings below

Are you a resident?

Park

Cranmore Garavogue V Gillas aravogue Doorly Doorly Park Cranmore Martin Savage

Trce

Tonaphubble

Tonaphubble other Other

YOUR FEEDBACK on the Regeneration Masterplan Ideas:

We want to know your thoughts and feedback

SUPPORT

THE VISION FOR REGENERATION of the East City Area and Cranmore

Q A-D

Improving access to quality amenities and open spaces

Q 1-5

Promoting historical assets in the area

Q 6-7

Providing quality spaces for community facilities

Q 8-10

Improving quality of the roads, streets and urban spaces

Q 11-14

Improving access and links

Q 15-20

Exploring options for sustainable energy

Q28

Improving housing quality and opportunity in the area

Q29-31

River Front Jetty and Pavilion:

5

improving access to quality amenities and open spaces promoting historical assets in the area providing quality spaces for community facilities improving quality of the roads, streets and urban spaces improving access and links making the most of the vacant sites in the area exploring options for sustainable energy improving housing quality and opportunity in the area

At Doorly Park and at Boat House Quay, used by rowers.

Why? Encourages more people to enjoy the River and provides changing facilities for water sports.

Comments on amenities and open spaces ideas?

Are there any gaps or any other projects you would like to see included?

.....................................................................................................................................................................................

...................................................................................................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................................................................

....................................................................................................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................................................................

.....................................................................................................................................................................................

....................................................................................................................................................................................

..................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................................................................

STAGE 3 MASTERPLAN IDEAS: QUESTIONAIRE EXHIBITION SLIGO SCHOOL PROJECT th th JULY 14 -­‐20 2014

Promoting historical assets in the area 6.

STAGE 3 MASTERPLAN IDEAS: QUESTIONAIRE EXHIBITION SLIGO SCHOOL PROJECT th th JULY 14 -­‐20 2014

We want to know your thoughts and feedback SUPPORT WOULD NOT SUPPORT

Brown's Field Developments: Conservation of remains of Carnsfort House:

The Gaol: is a Conservation Asset and could become an Art/Visitor Centre.

Masterplan Urban Design Ideas 8-­‐10

11. St Anne's Place Landscape: new tree planting here and along Cranmore Road.

Why? To make this place and link to the East City Area more attractive, without losing much parking.

12. Devins Drive Improvements: landscaped as an Avenue and new traffic light

controlled crossing.

Why? Residents suggested tree planting to reduce bleakness of street and asked for safer and easier crossing points.

13. Cranmore Road Improvements:

ESB Frontage Enhanced: new planting and pavement treatment.

Why? Residents wanted pavement to be wider and more attractive to use.

Ray McSharry Park Boundary Wall: replace with railings and widen pavement.

Why? Residents requested a better safer footpath. This is a hidden open space so railings would make walking past pleasurable rather than alienating.

14. Cemetery Car Park: access off lay-­‐by to small car park on existing pitch area,

cemetery expansion is possible as well.

Why? Mourners parking causes traffic congestion and parking on busy road for funerals is undignified.

Comments on quality street/urban spaces ideas?

Are there any gaps or any other projects you would like to see included?

...............................................................................................................................................................................

Providing quality spaces for community facilities

9.

Analysing the Questionnaire Feedback

b. Re-­‐Use of existing Abbey Quarter Centre Site: If new facility is built, site could be liberated for new housing.

Why? Residents emphasise the existing Centre is outdated, lacks a lift and access to appropriate outdoor spaces and parking is inadequate. Sale of site helps fund new Centre and delivers more diverse housing mix.

Medical Facility: suggested location is Central Cleared Site in Cranmore Why? Much needed facility identified by residents as a priority to could serve Sligo East City. Devins Drive location would give it a good profile and is walkable for residents. a. New Abbey Quarter Centre: Replacement proposed on Central Cleared site.

Upgrade of existing Abbey Quarter centre would require extensive work, disrupt the use of the Centre and would be a short term fix Why? Residents identified need for new spaces for meetings, clubs, training, and family support. Proposal illustrates combining those uses with quality outdoor spaces so all can be managed as one facility.

We want to know your thoughts and feedback SUPPORT WOULD NOT SUPPORT

Improving quality of the roads, streets and urban spaces

Masterplan Urban Design Ideas 11-­‐14

Why? it is a hidden asset and potentially a visitor destination attraction

8.

.............................................................................................................................................................................

10. a. Lodge Building at Doorly Park: Public owned building could be used as

community/information centre/cafe.

Why? It is on the river front trail at a good stopping point; could complement a pleasure boat jetty. Meeting Space also identified by local community as a need.

Awaits a viable use, needs to be pursued with a management group to lead its development 10. b. Garavogue Villas Community Meeting Room Space:

Potential for shared use of the Lodge?

or a converted house within Garavogue?

Why? Identified by local community as a need.

Comments on community facility and historical asset ideas?

...............................................................................................................................................................................

205 questionnaires were returned, and 3 letters received in respect of the exhibition. In our analysis of the questionnaire feedback, we have charted the levels of: • Support • Would not support • No comment

page 2 of 8

New mixed use sites with vehicle link from Cranmore Road to Racecourse View: Woodlands and walls of Carnsfoot House would be preserved Why? it is a hidden asset to be enjoyed, reflecting history of the area

People were asked to indicate if they would or would not support the proposals. Each questionnaire page had space for comments or other ideas.

............................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................................................................

............................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................... page 3 of 8

STAGE 3 MASTERPLAN IDEAS: QUESTIONAIRE EXHIBITION SLIGO SCHOOL PROJECT th th JULY 14 -­‐20 2014

Masterplan Urban Design Ideas 15-­‐20

Improving access and links

We want to know your thoughts and feedback SUPPORT WOULD NOT SUPPORT

15. New Link via Mercy lands to Chapel Hill and Town: New vehicle link from Devins and Geldof Drive to Chapel Hill. This requires a land swap with the School and replacement of Sean Fallon pitch on Cleveragh Regional Park site with new changing rooms. The existing school boundary wall would be replaced with more attractive railings. School drop and collect arrangements will be made easier.

Why? Residents identified need for better access to the School and Gym. The Plan shows a safe route for children and direct access to the School and to the City beyond. The new connections to Chapel Hill will provide pedestrian, cycle and vehicle access.

16. New Road Link: Joe Mc Donnell Drive to Chapel Hill and Town new wide cycle/path street from Joe McDonnell Drive to Chapel Hill To achieve the Joe McDonnell Link requires acquisition and removal of 4 houses.

Why? To make better connections between Joe Mc Donnell Drive and town, providing a safe direct route

17. New link through Browns Field providing good access to facilities such as I.T. Sligo, Regional Hospital via future new bridge. Opening up lands within Browns Field area and providing good connections to facilities Why? To provide better connections between Cranmore and facilities such as the IT and Hospital

18. New Avenue Link, through the Centre Block site linking Devins Drive to route to Browns Field via Racecourse View Why? To make better connection for the whole area

19. Gaol Road to Cranmore Road Link: a missing connection that would be a safe and useful pedestrian link to the River Why? New connection, like the Aldi link, would attract footfall, especially if Gaol becomes a visitor attraction.

20. Garavogue Villas Access: restriction signs Why? Residents asked for ways to keep out misrouted trucks.

STAGE 3 MASTERPLAN IDEAS: QUESTIONAIRE EXHIBITION SLIGO SCHOOL PROJECT th th JULY 14 -­‐20 2014

Masterplan Urban Design Ideas 21-­‐25

Getting the best potential out of the vacant and potential sites in the area

Cranmore Road Cleared Site: new residential (apartments) with open space, overlooking pedestrian link to Cranmore Place.

Why? Convenient central city site with good access to amenities, ideal for small apartments.

23

Brown's Field Developments: new mixed use sites with vehicle link from

Former Maisonettes Site: this is zoned as Existing Residential, we are suggesting

24

that this is the best use of this site Why? Centrally located publicly owned residential land is a long term asset for the City and community, provides a great location for residential use, with easy access to quality facilities such as Doorly Park, and Garavogue river

Centre Block Site: a new location for residential, community and medical facilities, and with quality open space. Carroll Drive extinguished: surface removed so amenity space of Cleared Site and East Mound make one large quality open space.

Why? Residents spoke of need for a new centre, for medical facilities and for new play spaces for all ages. New all weather pitch works well on corner with Devins Drive and mounds provide banked seating. A good location for a community resource. New Abbeyquarter location oversees the outdoor play spaces. Housing need is documented also in the Stage 2 Report.

Comments on vacant and potential site ideas?

...............................................................................................................................................................................

25

Comments on improving access and links ideas? ...............................................................................................................................................................................

...............................................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................

...............................................................................................................................................................................

............................................................................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................................................................

...............................................................................................................................................................................

STAGE 3 MASTERPLAN IDEAS: QUESTIONAIRE EXHIBITION SLIGO SCHOOL PROJECT th th JULY 14 -­‐20 2014

Masterplan Urban Design Ideas 25-­‐27

page 5 of 8

We want to know your thoughts and feedback SUPPORT WOULD NOT SUPPORT

Getting the best potential out of the vacant and potential sites in the area, continued

26

Development Site behind Globe House and Mercy School: this site could be

Cleveragh Drive Re-­‐Zoning: proposed that next Development Plan rezones these sites to Residential .

Why? With Racecourse, Doorly Park and Cleveragh Regional Park now attractive destinations, the lands lend themselves to Residential use (R2 Low/Medium Density).

Masterplan Design Ideas 28-­‐31

Exploring options for sustainable energy

28. Racecourse -­‐ Central Site: a recreation use and/or energy farm Why? Vacant land publicly owned. Potential for Ground Source Heat Pump scheme to provide a sustainable energy resource

29

Improving housing quality and opportunity in the area

We want to know your thoughts and feedback

MANY THANKS FOR COMING TO SEE THE EXHIBITION OF MASTERPLAN IDEAS

If you have any other thoughts or ideas, we’d like to hear them

.............................................................................................................................................. .............................................................................................................................................. .............................................................................................................................................. .............................................................................................................................................. ..............................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................. ..............................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................. .............................................................................................................................................. ..............................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................. ..............................................................................................................................................

............................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................... more space overleaf

Stage 3

STAGE 3 MASTERPLAN IDEAS: QUESTIONAIRE EXHIBITION SLIGO SCHOOL PROJECT th th JULY 14 -­‐20 2014

The information gathered here will be used in the next Stage of the Masterplan Process

31. Environmental improvements: A range of ideas are proposed

Why? Responding to issues raised in consultations last year, small scale improvements can make a big difference to local communities

Comments on potential sites, sustainable energy or housing ideas? ...............................................................................................................................................................................

page 6 of 8

Collery Drive: build across the Collery Drive alley to close it off. Would require

removal of 6 bungalows. Has an impact for existing residents: they would need new housing opportunities, possibly in redevelopment of centre block site.

Why? To extinguish a difficult to manage alley and to provide new housing to meet needs.

30. Housing Improvements focussing on Energy Efficiency for the Cranmore Estate: Options to upgrade housing stock to a better energy rating Why? Housing is in need of improvements, will reduce impact of fuel poverty and energy costs for residents

WE WELCOME YOUR THOUGHTS AND FEEDBACK, OR ANY IDEAS YOU MAY HAVE

useful for Mercy School expansion.

Why? If Mercy Link Rd went ahead Mercy School facilities would need to expand, so additional land could be acquired.

22

..............................................................................................................................................................................

27

Cranmore Road to Racecourse View. Woodlands and walls of Carnsfoot House would be preserved. Copse could provide space for adventure play. Mixed uses could include employment, civic facilities, education and residential.

Why? Publicly owned land asset that needs market interest to fund development.

New links created to Racecourse and to future developments behind Aldi and on Business Park Sites, provides good connections for residents in the area.

...............................................................................................................................................................................

We want to know your thoughts and feedback SUPPORT WOULD NOT SUPPORT

21. Redeveloping Mercy School Lands: a new green space with play area at the top of Chapel Hill; opportunity for new housing site Why? Makes an attractive urban place for existing and new residents and provides better spaces for school drop and collect times. Would help to change perceptions of the area

.............................................................................................................................................................................

Design Team Learning

page 4 of 8

Date issued: February 2015

Any Comments on the Vision and the Overview of the Social, Economic and Physical Plan Ideas?

Are there any gaps or any other projects you would like to see included?

We would welcome any thoughts you might have .......................................................................................................................................................................................

7.

The full questionnaire comments and letters received are included in the Appendices of this document. For each Questionnaire page we have analysed and charted the issues/nature of comments raised.

b. reducing mound to John Fallon Drive/Joe Mc Donnell Drive, will provide quality passive open space Why? Residents expressed need for new play spaces for all ages. The mounds create a negative impression of the area.

Exercise Trail: extend the existing Doorly Park trail through the Racecourse, New Avenue, Mercy Green and Chapel Hill.

Why? Makes a good exercise trail loop and brings new profile to Cranmore

....................................................................................................................................................................................

In the exhibition a central map with flags indicated the locations for the various ideas, and the display boards provided supporting information.

For each idea we have provided a description of what the Design team learnt from the feedback and the comments shared. We have concluded also from our overview of the comments that.

4

D. Physical Plan 8 key action areas are identified:

Over 600 comments were included in the questionnaires. Some questionnaires had no comments, others had many. The map overleaf charts the number of attendees, questionnaires returned and comments.

We have assessed the comments also, and include for each idea, an overview of the sentiments expressed. They provide a good insight into the reasons why people supported or did not support proposals, people also raised questions and concerns in the comments.

A number of potential initiatives are indicated on the exhibition boards

Masterplan Urban Design Ideas 6-­‐7

Feedback comments in the Questionnaires

a. linking Central Green space with Yeats Drive Mound with part of Carroll Drive extinguished: Why? Residents expressed need for new play spaces for all ages. New all weather pitch and outdoor play spaces (overlooked by a new Abbeyquarter building) will create a series of quality open spaces

C. Economic Plan

And on the last page, space for ..Other thoughts and Ideas?

The pages overleaf provide the detailed analysis. We have also charted the level of support by area, for each idea and an overview of each theme.

We noted that generally the level of support was consistent with the overall result. The only exception to this was for the Doorly Park/Martin Savage Terrace area, where there were higher levels of ‘no comment’. The levels of support generally were very positive. In terms of the questionnaire feedback, we recorded a strong or good level of support for all of the ideas.

For many of the ideas, we recorded levels of support in excess of 70%.

Create quality open spaces within Cranmore area

3

B. Social Plan for Regeneration

Getting the best potential out of the vacant and potential sites Q21-27 in the area

Gated access to new path to Sports Centre and Regional Park.

Why? Residents suggested a formal gate. The Plan proposes a safe and more direct pedestrian and cycle access to Sports Centre and pitches in Regional Park.

Why? The Vision for Regeneration describes 3 KEY AIMS for the Regeneration Masterplan: all of the projects and initiatives (social, economic and physical) will be targetted to support the achievement of this vision.

o o o o o o o o

Easy Access to Regional Sports Centre and Cleveragh: Racecourse Cross Route:

WOULD NOT SUPPORT

2

Several themes and ideas are illustrated on the exhibition boards

SUPPORT

1. Play Areas: Several sites are identified: Why? Residents identified absence of structured play space for all ages.

Ways to Achieve the Vision:

Vision for Regeneration

Improving access to quality amenities and open spaces

WOULD NOT SUPPORT

A. Do you agree with the Vision for Regeneration proposed?

We want to know your thoughts and feedback

Masterplan Urban Design Ideas 1-­‐5

There are a lot of ideas on display here today; some may be of more interest to you than others.

We want to know what is important to you. We welcome your feedback, if you need any help with filling in the questionnaire, please ask one of the staff here today, your thoughts are important to help us develop a Regeneration Masterplan that meets the needs and makes the most of the East City Area.

STAGE 3 MASTERPLAN IDEAS: QUESTIONAIRE EXHIBITION SLIGO SCHOOL PROJECT th th JULY 14 -­‐20 2014

page 7 of 8

.............................................................................................................................................. .............................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................

If you would like to take the questionnaire away, please return to the Regeneration Office 7 Devins Drive, Sligo LAST DAY FOR RECEIPT: FRIDAY 25th JULY

page 8 of 8

Page 40

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

The Vision for Regeneration of the East City Area & Cranmore A-D

Overview The vision is for an integrated Masterplan for the Regeneration of Cranmore and Sligo East City incorporating a broad range of initiatives in the social, economic and physical environment.

Four questions were asked: A. B. C. D.

Do you agree with the Vision for Regeneration proposed?

Social Plan for Regeneration: Several themes and ideas are illustrated on the exhibition boards Economic Plan: A number of potential initiatives are indicated on the exhibition boards Physical Plan 8 key action areas are identified: • improving access to quality amenities and open spaces • promoting historical assets in the area • providing quality spaces for community facilities • improving quality of the roads, streets and urban spaces • improving access and links • making the most of the vacant sites in the area • exploring options for sustainable energy • improving housing quality and opportunity in the area

Overview : Vision for Regenera1on Results A -­‐ D A Vision for Regenera=on Proposed

B Social Plan for Regenera=on Support Would not Support No Comment

C Economic Plan

D Physical Plan

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Description In terms of overall vision, ideas for the three integrated plans were produced and displayed in the exhibition, ideas for social plan for regeneration, economic plan and physical plan.

In relation to the Social Plan a number of issues were identified which related to the importance of education and supporting people into employment, training for young people and improving facilities for all ages.

In relation to the Economic Plan there is a need to develop opportunities for training, for job creation, supports for local businesses and tourism. There was a need for an integrated agency approach to improving the economic environment within the regeneration area.

In relation to the Physical Plan there was a need identified to improve the housing quality, making the whole regeneration area better connected to the surrounding area and the City of Sligo. There was a need identified to improve community facilities including recreational, medical and social. Identifying opportunities for vacant sites and improving the general infrastructure and promoting local historical assets.

The following pages arrange the feedback for each idea in detail. See appendix A for the full range of comments expressed in relation to these ideas and an overview chart of the various issues raised by people.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 41

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

The Vision for Regeneration of the East City Area & Cranmore

75% support

Vision for Regeneration

A

What was proposed?

There were a range of initiatives proposed in the social, economic and the physical environment by the Masterplan Team. The vision is for a well integrated sustainable community with enhanced facilities, that is well connected to the surrounding communities and city wide facilities with improved access to education and job opportunities.

The questionnaire asked: Do you agree with the Vision for Regeneration proposed?

•

• •

To make the East City area and Cranmore a more attractive place to live with better, more convenient connections to existing and new facilities, locally and in the rest of Sligo.

To enable individuals and communities of the area to avail of opportunities, with good access to employment, education, health and family support services.

To see the East City area become the location of choice for future generations to live, work and visit.

Public Exhibition

Public Exhibition

Why?

The Vision for Regeneration describes 3 KEY AIMS for the Regeneration Masterplan: all of the projects and initiatives (social, economic and physical) will be targeted to support the achievement of this vision.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments

The overall support for the regeneration plan ‘Vision’ is very positive from members of the public.

There are however a number of comments on the negative effect the regeneration projects may have on areas outside of Cranmore.

What did the Design Team learn?

While there is considerable support from the public for the Regeneration process some were concerned at the pace of progress and the impact the Regeneration would have on the surrounding communities. It is important that these communities are integrated into the potential that Regeneration can bring to the Sligo East City area. It is also important that the Design Team produce a clear phasing programme for projects so the critical and urgent projects are targeted first. However it is essential to develop some ‘quick wins’ to generate confidence in the overall process.

Do you agree with the Vision for Regenera3on proposed Support Would not Support No Comment 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on A

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “There are too many changes in the Regeneration Masterplan. Instead the funding should be used to maintain and enhance the houses and open spaces that we already have. Small, manageable and realistic actions need to be undertaken as I feel that too many changes will lose the essence of our community in Cranmore.”

“Excellent suggestions, everything is there.”

“Promoting historical assets in the area. Our very historical building is the lodge and there is no plans to do anything with it. Leave maisonette area as it is.”

“Regeneration without making the place worse for other areas. I can see a lot of benefits for Cranmore but Martin Savage / Doorly Park is worse off.”

“Excellent ideas – Collaborative and flexible approach required from all stakeholders to deliver the plan. Doesn’t all have to be done at once or step by step approach.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Date issued: February 2015

Do you agree with the Vision for Regenera+on proposed Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on A by Area

Stage 3

Page 42

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

The Vision for Regeneration of the East City Area & Cranmore B

75% support

Social Plan for Regeneration

What was proposed?

Social Plan for Regeneration: themes and strategies were outlined on the display panels.

Why?

The strategies and action proposed by the Social Plan are designed to address the issues identified in the Stage 1 socio-economic profile.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments

Comments suggested that residents are very concerned at the issue of anti-social behaviour and suggest more focused efforts to address it. The prospect of improving access to credit facilities was suggested.

Comments also stressed the need to focus on supporting people into employment and of linking training with opportunities for work. Young people were mentioned as a specific target group in this regard.

Social Plan workshop March 2014

Social Plan workshop March 2014

The importance of education and of creating ways to improve literacy and numeracy were raised. The importance of sport and recreation was raised.

Concerns were expressed at the proposal for a new Abbeyquarter Centre in relation to the current social activities and services. It was stressed that the new centre needs to be built before the current centre is closed to avoid disruption.

There were suggestions to focus more on the needs of Asylum Seekers and residents of Globe House as they are within the regeneration area.

Social Plan for Regenera3on

What did the Design Team learn?

The comments indicate that there was a broad welcome for the strategies and actions proposed by the Social Plan. The Team are conscious that the display only managed to convey a very condensed summary of the proposals in the Social Plan and we are confident that the suggestions are already incorporated into the Social Plan, including Sport and Recreation to which a section in the Social Plan is dedicated.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “All of the above are welcome however, unless the issues around education, unemployment, single parent families and dependency are addressed, all of the proposals will not improve the real life experience of the residents of this area.

Emphasis needed for Income support to return to work place rather than welfare.”

Support Would not Support No Comment 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on B

“Identify skills needs of Private and Public and target training in these areas”

Social Plan for Regenera+on

“Anti-Social behaviour in particular drug related intimidation may need a more focused plan/intervention - co-ordination of agencies and clarification of roles and responsibilities.”

“Literacy and numeracy programmes need to be encouraged in a positive way. Mobile Library now visiting Cranmore could be a cost effective stepping stone in this regard” “Would like to see more mention of Asylum Seekers and residents of Globe House as they are within the regeneration area.”

“Reservation on Plan (B) Sport and Recreation is missing from the key Actions. Sports and Recreation should be an underpinning strategy as it has a very positive influence on all listed themes. Fundamental for the success of any strategy.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Total Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble

Support

Doorly Park / Mar7n Savage

Would not Support No Comment

Other Cranmore 0

50

100

150

200

Responses to Ques+on B by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 43

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

The Vision for Regeneration of the East City Area & Cranmore C

75% support

Economic Plan

What was proposed?

Economic Plan : a number of potential initiatives were indicated on the exhibition boards .

Why?

The strategies and action proposed by the Economic Plan are designed to address the issues identified in the Stage 1 Report: Socio Economic Profile.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments

Comments suggested a broad welcome for the actions included in the Economic Plan. A number of comments indicated the need to develop opportunities for training and for creating the infrastructure for small enterprises and to provide additional supports to local businesses.

Economic Plan workshop September 2014

Economic Plan workshop September 2014

There was general agreement for developing the tourism potential of the area, though there were concerns that this should not be over-developed.

Some comments suggested the inclusion of agencies in the Economic Plan.

What did the Design Team learn?

The comments indicate that there was a broad welcome for the strategies and actions proposed by the Economic Plan.

The Team are conscious that the display only managed to convey a very condensed summary of the proposals in the Economic Plan. A roundtable session was held with stakeholders in September.

Suggestions have been incorporated into the final Stage 3 Economic Plan.

Economic Plan workshop September 2014

Economic Plan

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Turn the Abbeyquarter centre into a training facility” “Access to education, training developed, allotments, enterprise units” “If the Abbeyquarter was moved - would the building be changed with business units for local people eg Office, welding units, fixing cars (lots of boys doing this in street already).”

Support Would not Support No Comment

“Promote a walking trail from Town Centre - guided walks.

Cafe/Meeting Area in Cranmore along River”

0

“Use this facility to drive economic development / local jobs Tea/Coffee shop”

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on C

“More support for local business in the area.”

Economic Plan

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on C by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 44

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

The Vision for Regeneration of the East City Area & Cranmore D

71% support

Physical Plan

What was proposed?

Physical Plan : 8 key action areas were identified: • • • • • • • •

improving access to quality amenities and open spaces promoting historical assets in the area providing quality spaces for community facilities improving quality of the roads, streets and urban spaces improving access and links making the most of the vacant sites in the area exploring options for sustainable energy improving housing quality and opportunity in the area

Overview of Themes and Sentiments

There is good support for the Physical Plan. While physical improvements to housing, street and green areas are considered positive in principle, there are a some concerns about some of the proposals.

Public Exhibition

Public Exhibition

Projects centered around the Mercy Green School have been met with some opposition by local residents living in the immediate area.

Opposition to new roads and additional housing is a general concern for many residents both in specific areas and throughout Cranmore.

Some members of the public feel that areas outside of Cranmore have been marginalized by the regeneration proposals.

What did the Design Team learn?

There is considerable support for the Physical Plan as outlined. We believe that most people understood the interrelationship of many of these ideas. There was concern that no new social housing should be developed except for those with special needs. There was also some concern expressed around new roads and while there was an understanding of a need for this connectivity some hoped that this could be achieved with pedestrian and cycle routes.

The use of the open green space needs to be carefully considered to achieve the optimum solution.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Physical Plan Support Would not Support No Comment

“Improving access to and from ‘interlinks’ between residents and wider community is an excellent plan which needs to be supported – the outcomes of this supports greater integration between residents and wider environment in which they live.”

0

20

40

“I would give general support for most of the ideas. My overriding thought is that there be no more houses built in Cranmore. This estate is just mellowing for the residents after nearly forty years. We do not need an influx of new blood or any more houses in one of the largest estates in the County.”

“I don’t think ‘free space’ should always be ‘filled up’. Green patches and areas could be kept as they are.”

“We’d like to see something for Garavogue.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

80

100

120

140

160

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on D

“Agree with house in Cranmore place best use of space.

Make all one bed houses into two bed so when you unable to look after yourself you can have someone stay.”

“Work on the small things, like landscaping. Get the parking sorted at the corner of Government building. (ie parking, footpath.)”

60

Physical Plan Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Responses to Ques+on D by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 45

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access to Quality Amenities and Open Spaces Urban Design Ideas 1 - 5 Overview Urban design ideas 1-5 relate to play, activity and green spaces in the study area.

The team assessed the existing facilities and made five key recommendations for their enhancement.

Idea 1 - play areas Idea 2 - easy access to Regional Sports Centre and Cleveragh: Racecourse Cross Route Idea 3 - create quality open spaces within Cranmore area Idea 4 - exercise trails Idea 5 - river front jetty and pavilion

Overview : Urban Design Ideas Ques4onnaire Feedback Ques4ons 1 -­‐ 5 1 Play Areas

2 Easy Access to Regional Sports Centre and Cleveragh 3a Create Quality Open Spaces: linking Central Green with Yeats Drive Mount

Support Would not Support

3b Create Quality Open Spaces: reducing mound to John Fallon Drive

No Comment

4 Exercise Trail

5 River Front Je3y and Pavilion 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Support for these ideas ranged from 70% - 79%

The following pages analyse the feedback for each idea in detail.

See appendix A for full range of comments expressed in relation to these ideas and our overview chat of the various issues raised in this section of the questionnaire.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 46

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access to Quality Amenities and Open Spaces Question 1

78% support

Play Areas

What was proposed?

Play Areas: Several sites are identified

Why?

Residents identified absence of structured play space for all ages.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments

There is high level of support for this idea. There are comments for and against the introduction of new play areas, some spoke or voiced concerns about the need for maintenance and security.

A place for parents to sit and watch the children was suggested, with picnic spaces and sheltering trees.

Places for different age groups were highlighted as a need.

Areas to cycle, skate and hangout, while remaining observed.

Collery Drive, Joe McDonnell and Garavogue Villas are some of the places where new play areas were welcomed.

What did the Design Team learn?

Overall responses indicate very strong support for the proposals.

There were mixed views expressed in the comments with some respondents seeking more immediately located play areas within each street, whereas others felt that there were already enough play areas or they should be centrally located.

plan highlighting possible locations for play areas

Play Areas

Comments mentioned the need for ongoing maintenance.

There were also a number of comments returned noting the absence of quality play space in the Garavogue Villas area.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Play areas are a great idea. It would be even better if an area was made for parents to sit down and watch the kids.

Picnic areas and benches would be a great idea for the open spaces.” “near where parents can watch with seats to sit. If putting in trees make sure big ones not too near a house. Ensure green areas/trees are maintained.”

Support Would not Support No Comment 0

“Maintain any play areas and keep clean. Any play or any recreation area that is created needs to be fit for purpose, maintained and if abused, monitored and close up if needed.”

20

“.. reduction of wasted areas in mounds into an amenity area very positive.”

“Garavogue Villas kids used to play in Ray McSharry Park before it was developed and then they played in the Gaol, but they have all gone now, - there’s no space for the children to play.” “specifically like central green for play area”

80

100

120

140

160

180

Play Areas

“Collery play area for children.”

“I feel that there are enough play areas. The most important thing is that they are maintained for children.”

60

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 1

“Play area in Joe McDonnell”

“Could do with more play areas for kids with BMX and skateboards.”

40

Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore

Full list of comments are at appendix A

0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 1 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 47

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access to Quality Amenities and Open Spaces Question 2 What was Proposed?

75% support

Easy Access to Regional Sports Centre and Cleveragh

Gated access to new path to Sports Centre and Regional Park.

Why? Residents suggested a formal gate. The Plan proposes a safe and more direct pedestrian and cycle access to Sports Centre and pitches in Regional Park.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a high level of support, with 75% supportive of the idea. In the comments the Regional Sports Centre is recognised as a valuable resource to the community and the city. The number of people in support of direct links to Cranmore reflects this value.

However some expressed additional routes.

concerns

about

opening

It is suggested that the purpose of Sligo Racecourse may be compromised by the pedestrian link. One solution proposed through the feedback is for the pedestrian route to follow the perimeter of the site.

plan highlighting gated access to new path to Sports Centre and Regional Park

What did the Design Team learn?

Overall responses indicate very strong support for the proposals.

Responses noted that in addition to enhancing connectivity consideration should be given to ensuring the ongoing funding and success of the Regional Sports Centre itself.

It is an important point amongst all the projects seeking new capital that focus is not lost to ensure and enhance the performance of existing facilities such as the sports centre.

Often the financial need to be self-supporting in facilities of this nature can be at odds with making the facilities optimally available and clearly accessible to the immediate community.

Easy Access to Regional Sports Centre and Cleveragh Support Would not Support No Comment

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

0

“Opening up new access points to Cranmore will create more issues.”

“Would not support access through the racecourse, as this is a facility with a separate purpose.”

“County Sligo Racecourse suggests the use of the perimeter of their leased land for pedestrian link in lieu of Direct links across the land. This suggestion was previously indicated during interviews with the regeneration team.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 2

“Regional Sports Centre well established and fantastic resource to Sligo - would like to see improvements to this facility included in the plan” “Don’t see why we need easier access to sports complex as its easy enough as it is.”

20

Easy Access to Regional Sports Centre and Cleveragh Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 2 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 48

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access to Quality Amenities and Open Spaces Question 3 What was Proposed?

72% support 3a 71% support 3b

Create Quality Open Spaces Within Cranmore Area

A. Linking Central Green space with Yeats Drive Mound with part of Carroll Drive extinguished.

B. Reducing mound to John Fallon Drive/Joe Mc Donnell Drive, will provide quality passive open space.

Why?

A. Residents expressed need for new play spaces for all ages. New all weather pitch and outdoor play spaces (overlooked by a new Abbeyquarter building) will create a series of quality open spaces.

B. Residents expressed need for new play spaces for all ages. The mounds create a negative impression of the area.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments

There was a high level of support. There were only a few comments specifically on this question. In the comments there was some resistance to the development of the central block site and mounds. Others recognise the potential for these sites to become functioning amenity spaces.

There are concerns that plans for the central block site will mean the loss of open space. The feedback suggests a need for greater variety in the age groups and sports activities that are catered for.

There are differing views about the mounds. The mounds are viewed by some as both sheltering and attractors of anti-social behaviour.

plan highlighting open spaces within Cranmore

What did the Design Team learn?

Overall responses indicate very strong support for the proposals.

Improving the potential of the mounds while maintaining privacy would respond to all concerns.

The responses note the underlying nervousness about the redevelopment of the green spaces. Some note that simple ‘green’ spaces are important as relief spaces and intensive use for sport or similar could be a negative move.

Within the responses the need for people to engage and interact with the green areas is noted but also the significance of keeping them as green lungs for the community. There has been strong commentary noted through out the process that the cleared centreblock site has been welcomed as an open space.

Create Quality Open Spaces within Cranmore Area -­‐ Linking Central Green with Yeats Drive

Create Quality Open Spaces within Cranmore Area -­‐ Reducing Mound to John Fallon Drive/Joe McDonnell Drive

Support

Support

Would not Support

Would not Support

No Comment

No Comment

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0

20

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 3a

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 3b

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “keep current green park at the heart of community” “Specifically like centre green for play area.”

“Community gardens and allotment schemes should be included in the designs, like the idea of opening up the estate.”

“It took 30 years to get a green area and the mounds should be left alone with nothing built on them and the resident didn’t agree to the mounds been removed before and should be left alone.”

“I consider that quality open spaces are very important for people’s general well being, not so much because of their uses but because of the aesthetic and therapeutic value of nature.”

Create Quality Open Spaces within Cranmore Area -­‐ Linking Central Green with Yeats Drive Garavogue Villas

Create Quality Open Spaces within Cranmore Area -­‐ Reducing Mound to John Fallon Drive/Joe McDonnell Drive Garavogue Villas

Tonaphubble

Tonaphubble

Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Responses to Ques+on 3a by Area

70

Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Responses to Ques+on 3b by Area

“Get rid of mounds or level a bit at Yeats Drive. At the moment it’s a hiding spot for anti-social behaviour.”

“Possible need for fences / hedging bordering mounds once reduced in order to deter unwanted caravans moving in.”

“Why more all weather pitches - for soccer - football. What is there for those children and adults interested in other sports like Tennis.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 49

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access to Quality Amenities and Open Spaces Question 4

70% support

Exercise Trail

What was Proposed?

Exercise Trail: extend the existing Doorly Park trail through the Racecourse, New Avenue, Mercy Green and Chapel Hill.

Why? Makes a good exercise trail loop and brings new profile to Cranmore.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was strong support at 70%. Commentary by the public has been positive. A small number of comments made in respect to this idea. It has been suggested that activities be centred around the route with guided walks, recreation spaces and gathering locations such as cafes. Emphasis has been placed on making the route cycle / walking.

What did the Design Team learn?

Overall responses indicate very strong support for the proposals.

plan highlighting potential routes for an extended exercise trail

Respondents note the generally positive nature of including an exercise trail in wider walking or cycle loops in the area.

The route needs to connect to other loops so there is an element of choice of experiences and length of route.

Exercise Trail

They note the importance of making the exercise trail a focus for events and engagement with the community.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Exercise Trail should be a complete (360) degree loop, have a bike hire, guided walker for economic development.”

‘Is there a plan for a cycle way on new Sligo East City Link Bridge?”

Support Would not Support No Comment

“Guide of walks / cycle - Cafe / Social structure for people to meet.”

0

20

“Arranged walks and exercise events.”

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 4

“we really do need somewhere for the 10-16 year olds to blow off steam. Skateboard / rollerblade / bmx / cycling / target wall for practicing football skills.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Exercise Trail Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Responses to Ques+on 4 by Area Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 50

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access to Quality Amenities and Open Spaces Question 5

79% support

River Front Jetty and Pavilion

What was Proposed?

River front jetty and pavilion at Doorly Park and at Boat House Quay, used by rowers.

Why? Encourages more people to enjoy the river and provides changing facilities for water sports.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There is a strong level of support. While generally positive there is some fear about the environmental impact of developing the boat house and jetty. The return of a river cruise which once operated from Doorly Park is welcomed.

The potential for developing tourism and leisure activities is seen as a positive.

What did the Design Team learn?

Overall responses indicate very strong support for the proposals. plan highlighting river front jetty and pavilion in yellow

The key focus of written commentary related to the need to ensure that any development maintained the natural beauty of the existing riverfront, whilst encouraging uses, which would promote the river for primarily tourist uses.

River Front Je9y and Pavilion

The key driver was to leverage this amenity for employment generation in the immediate area.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Developing the river front jetty is a good idea and unfortunately one neglected for years. A river cruise no longer operated from Doorly Park for this reason. We need better co-operation with tourist ventures to make the most of natural resources.”

“Site of Boat House Quay ideal for Water Sports Pavilion.”

Support Would not Support No Comment

“Absolute ban on speed boating etc. Considered a non invasive river development in a measured way. Protection of flora and fauna. Critical - no over development.”

0

“More needs to be done with the river front Jetty to make it more accessible to everyone and for more water sports.”

“space for slip-subaqua boats etc.”

“Something at the boat house would be a great addition to the area” “Use this facility to drive economic development” Full list of comments are at appendix A

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 5

‘Beauty of Lough Gill is in its undeveloped state. I would not support the building of pavilions by either local authority or the ‘Grammar’ which will detract from the area.”

“More focus on the river as a place for sport leisure and start up water based business.”

20

River Front Je6y and Pavilion Total Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble

Support

Doorly Park / Mar7n Savage

Would not Support No Comment

Other Cranmore 0

50

100

150

200

Responses to Ques+on 5 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 51

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Promoting Historical Assets in the Area Urban Design Ideas 6 - 7 Overview Projects 6 and 7 identified the Gaol as a considerable historic asset in the community which is currently in the ownership of Sligo County Council. There are several potential new uses for this including an Art and Visitor’s Centre similar to other Gaol conversions in Wicklow and Dublin. Carnsfort House remains and a walled garden also represent a significant historical memory for the community which we believe is worth articulating a formal landscape response to repair and re-use. There are several remaining original boundary walls around the regeneration area which we believe should be repaired and retained as part of the overall project.

The Gaol

Overview : Urban Design Ideas Ques4onnaire Feedback Ques4ons 6-­‐7 6 Brown's Field Developments Support Would not Support No Comment

7 The Gaol

0

20

40

60

80 100 120 140 160 180

Carnsfort House

Support for these ideas ranged from 71% (Brown’s Field / Carnsfort House) to 80% (Gaol).

The following pages analyse the feedback for each idea in detail.

See appendix A for full range of comments expressed in relation to these ideas and our overview chat of the various issues raised in this section of the questionnaire.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 52

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Promoting Historical Assets in the Area Question 6

71% support

Brown’s Field Developments

What was proposed?

Conservation of remains of Carnsfort House: New mixed use sites with vehicle link from Cranmore Road to Racecourse view: Woodlands and walls of Carnsfort House would be preserved.

Why? It is a hidden asset to be enjoyed, reflecting history of the area.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a high level of support. Conservation of the remains of Carnsfort House and walled garden is considered a positive move. Many members of the public have recent memories of Carnsfort House and recognise its importance to the area and wish for the grounds and woodlands to be protected for the benefit of the community.

Some concern has been expressed over the link from Cranmore Road to Racecourse View. Concern was also expressed regarding the potential for anti-social behaviour once Brown’s Field is opened up.

plan highlighting Brown’s Field development

What did the Design Team learn?

The Design Team understand that Brown’s Field is a considerable development asset for Sligo County Council and it also provides an opportunity for an additional link between the north and south parts of the Regeneration Area. It should be seen in isolation from other parts of the community and has potential to cater for a number of different uses in additional to residential. The works around the remains of the former Carnsfort House is an important part of this consideration.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Brown's Field Developments Support Would not Support No Comment

“I support conservation of Carnsfort House but do not see the need for vehicle link between Cranmore Rd to Racecourse view.”

0

“I would not support Brown’s field developments it was a lovely house one time and like everything else knocked down, why?”

“There was an orchard there too - bring back apples - lovely cider apples” “Community ownership through Co-ops would enable all community benefit from business and employment opportunities eg urban farm, plant nurseries, co-op cafe, laundrette etc” Full list of comments are at appendix A

60

80

100

120

140

160

Brown's Field Developments

“Brown’s field will turn into a drinking area, antisocial behaviour etc. Enough – leave alone.”

“ Keep the woodlands, the house is a pile of rubbish, knock it and put in a plaque”

40

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 6

“Make a proper walkway through it.”

“Keep walled garden.”

20

Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 6 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 53

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Promoting Historical Assets in the Area Question 7

80% support

The Gaol

What was proposed?

The Gaol is a conservation asset and could become an Art/ Visitor Centre.

Why? It is a hidden asset and potentially a visitor destination attraction.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a high level of support for this idea. There was mostly positive feedback from the questionnaires regarding the conservation and the re-use of the Gaol. The only criticism of the proposal was why work had not been considered sooner. All who commented feel that this is a worth while project, attracting tourists to the area and potential employment.

Some reservation about plans for the old machinery garage.

What did the Design Team learn?

People see the Gaol as an historic asset and something that they clearly see as part of their community with potential for a new contemporary use not just as a useful functioning tourist or cultural space but also as a potential employment opportunity.

plan highlighting the Gaol

The Gaol

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “The Gaol – Could be part of a tour from historical buildings, the courthouse to good, many historical goods have been refurbished and attract great numbers of tourists, Definitely a hidden asset.”

“I am surprised something wasn’t done years ago – they took so much out of it – the beds – all that was taken away – that was a shame. I’d like to see things on in the evening.”

Support Would not Support No Comment

“Would that mean that the old machinery garage would be knocked down?”

0

“Sligo Gaol - treatment as an art / visitor centre is very narrow, may exclude other opportunities”

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 7

“The Gaol is a hidden gem that should be opened to public.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

The Gaol Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 7 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 54

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Providing Quality Spaces for Community Facilities Urban Design Ideas 8 - 10 Overview There was a concern expressed at the lack of community facilities within the Regeneration area. The current Abbeyquarter Centre was perceived to be out of the way and not readily accessible for all. A more central location was proposed which would be allow easy acces for those with disabilities adn mobility issues and which could also provide external recreational facilities. Additional meeting rooms are proposed in Garavogue Villas in one of the converted houses. The existing lodge at Doorly Park adjoining the Garavogue river is proposed for conversion as a community managed facility providing both meeting space and a potential tourist facility.

Overview : Urban Design Ideas Ques4onnaire Feedback Ques4ons 8-­‐10 8 Medical Facility

9a New Abbeyquarter Centre 9b Re-­‐Use of Exis;ng Abbeyquarter Centre

Support Would not Support

10a Lodge Building at Doorly Park

No Comment

10b Garavogue Villas Community Mee;ng Room Space: Shared 10b Garavogue Villas Community Mee;ng Room Space: Converted 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Support for these ideas ranged from 54% - 77%

The following pages analyse the feedback for each idea in detail.

See appendix A for full range of comments expressed in relation to these ideas and our overview chat of the various issues raised in this section of the questionnaire.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 55

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Providing Quality Spaces for Community Facilities Question 8

74% support

Medical Facility

What was proposed?

Suggested location is central cleared site in Cranmore.

Why? Much needed facility identified by residents as a priority to serve Sligo East City. Devins Drive location would give it a good profile and is walkable for residents.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a high level of support at 74%. There are only a small number of comments in relation to the medical centre in the proposed area. These mainly relate to the location of the facility. Some suggest alternative locations for example the ‘Former Maisonettes Site’ (project 24) and ‘Cranmore Road Cleared Site (project 22).

Some concerns centred around the lack of investment in GP and Pharmacy. Some saw the projects potential instead of proposals for new housing in the area.

What did the Design Team learn?

plan highlighting possible location for the Medical Facility in blue

There would be welcome for the introduction of a medical facility. There is some debate on its scale and location and what kind of facility it might offer the area.

Medical Facility

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “GP would need an incentive to come.”

“Medical Centre location in the area would stop more social housing being built on the site.”

“Private / Commercial investment may be possible for parties of Health / Medical facilities e.g. GP, Pharmacy.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Support Would not Support No Comment 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 8

Medical Facility Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 8 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 56

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Providing Quality Spaces for Community Facilities

62% support

Question 9a New Abbeyquarter Centre What was proposed?

Replacement proposed on central cleared site. Upgrade of existing Abbeyquarter centre would require extensive work, disrupt the use of the centre and would be a short term fix.

Why? Residents identified need for new spaces for meetings, clubs, training, and family support. Proposal illustrates combining those uses with quality outdoor spaces so all can be managed as one facility.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a good level of support at 62%. The benefit of new facilities is recognised in the positive feedback, the centre plays an important functional and social roll in the community.

Improved facilities is a common request throughout the feedback analysis. However the loss of the existing facilities is a concern. Some have stated that they believe a new Abbeyquarter Centre should not replace the old building.

Others suggested the existing building should be retained for other uses.

plan highlighting possible location for a new Abbeyquarter Centre in blue

Provision of more pitches, training facilities and employment opportunities was highlighted in some of the comments.

New Abbeyquarter Centre

What did the Design Team learn?

This idea is not straight forward. While the community welcome additional well laid out and flexible internal and external facilities there was a concern expressed about the loss of the existing building. However the community appreciate that the old facility is inadequate for many of its required functions. We believe a new use must be found for the existing centre or if it is to remain. A detailed brief and separate study needed for feasibility of new Centre.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Support Would not Support No Comment

“Community ownership through Co-ops would enable all community benefit from business and employment opportunities. E.g. Urban Farm, Plant Nurseries, Co-op Café, Launderette etc.”

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 9a

“Moving Abbeyquarter centre including the soccer pitch is not a viable option as it only is short term fix, should be more pitches, training facilities for kids along with existing site.”

New Abbeyquarter Centre

“Would new centre be built before old one knocked?”

“Cannot understand why you would knock down Abbeyquarter Centre to build a new one as it is fine as it stands. More money would be wasted by doing this.”

“Sport area ‘indoor’ in old Abbeyquarter” Full list of comments are at appendix A

Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Responses to Ques+on 9a by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 57

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Providing Quality Spaces for Community Facilities

54% support

Question 9b Re-Use of Existing Abbeyquarter Centre Site

What was proposed?

If new facility is built, site could be liberated for new housing.

Why? Residents emphasise the existing Centre is outdated, lacks a lift and access to appropriate outdoor spaces and parking is inadequate. Sale of site helps fund new Centre and delivers more diverse housing mix.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was not a strong consensus for this idea. While new community facilities are considered positive many members of the public have come to identify with the existing Abbey Quarter Centre and would not like to see it knocked down.

Even though its appearance is questioned, many believe it should stay and fulfil an alternative role, such as training facility, sports or leisure, youth cafe or artists space etc.

Most of the negative feedback is centred around plans to replace the existing centre with housing. Particularly opposed by the residents of Geldof Drive who are concerned that more public housing will be built at this location.

What did the Design Team learn?

This is more complex than first appears. A new facility is preferred instead of the existing facility. However there is a strong view that an alternative use should be found for the existing building. Concern was expressed that no public housing should be located at this site on Geldof Drive.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

plan highlighting the existing Abbeyquarter Community Centre

Re-­‐Use of Exis3ng Abbeyquarter Centre Site Support

“Abbeyquarter is an eye sore, it looks like an RUC station, very bad reflection on the community.”

Would not Support

“Abbeyquarter Community Centre to stay in current area as it has become the heart of Cranmore.”

No Comment

“Use the Abbeyquarter centre and turn it into a training facility.”

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 9b

“Would not like to see social housing built on Geldof Drive.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Re-­‐Use of Exis+ng Abbeyquarter Centre Site Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar:n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Responses to Ques+on 9b by Area Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 58

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Providing Quality Spaces for Community Facilities

77% support

Question 10a Lodge Building at Doorly Park What was proposed?

Public owned building could be used as community / information centre / cafe.

Why? It is on the river front trail at a good stopping point; could complement a pleasure boat jetty. Meeting Space also identified by local community as a need. Awaits a viable use, needs to be pursued with a management group to lead its development

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a strong level of support. Different ideas were suggested. The public recognise the great potential for tourism in this area as people are drawn to the river. Many consider that the Lodge has business potential catering for amenities and refreshments which could provide employment in season.

The other idea was a community space for Doorly Park residents.

There are some management concerns about any potential use of the both the Lodge and the river. These all need to be carefully considered as part of other projects in the area.

plan highlighting the location of the Lodge Building at Doorly Park in orange

Lodge Building at Doorly Park

What did the Design Team learn?

There is broad support for the refurbishment of this building to create a new public use related to the lake and adjoining park and recreation areas.

A brief should be developed as part of a business plan. If this is a seasonal tourist facility what can its out of season use be. How can we link the building with the use of the river and the park over the full year.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Support Would not Support No Comment

“Redevelop what is there – would make a lovely coffee shop.”

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 10a

“OK for canoes etc. Not for speed boating, no way.”

“Who would manage the new proposed ideas for the lodge?”

“Definitely a need for more tourist attractions / amenities etc. The river area has huge potential.”

Lodge Building at Doorly Park

“Difficult to see use as community – What about a business focus?”

“The only heritage in our area - leave it as a community centre” Full list of comments are at appendix A

Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 10a by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 59

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Providing Quality Spaces for Community Facilities Question 10b Garavogue Villas Community shared 61% support Meeting Room Space convert 43% support What was proposed?

Two options were suggested: 1. Potential for shared use of the Lodge?

2. Or a converted house within Garavogue?

Why? Identified by local community as a need.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There are two elements under consideration, a) the re-use of the lodge building, b) the re-use of one of the residential units for community use or tourist uses connected with the lake. The support was very positive for a shared use, a converted house was not supported but the high level of ‘no comment’ should be noted also.

What did the Design Team learn?

The re-use of the lodge as an historical building with local history now in public ownership that could form a pivotal role at the entrance to the park and access to the river was considered in a very positive way.

plan highlighting the location of the Lodge building at Doorly Park in orange

The second idea for the re-use of one of the existing houses in Garavogue was not supported in the questionnaire response.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Think the lodge would double up as a community centre for both Doorly Park / Martin Savage and Garavogue Residents and be a information centre by day.”

“Could equally be a private venue with Community involvement, the building could be decorated with photos and info on the history of the area with opportunities as a ‘gateway’ to the amenities offered by Doorly Park, Cleveragh and the Lake – hire of bicycles etc, boat trips, walking – great tourist potential.”

Garavogue Villas Community Mee3ng Room -­‐ shared use of lodge

Garavogue Villas Community Mee3ng Room -­‐ converted house

Support

Support

Would not Support

Would not Support

No Comment

No Comment 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

140

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 10b

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 10b

“Again the upgrade of Lodge and old Gaol building will create an opportunity to get together and not feel left out.”

“Lodge Building would need to be a new purpose for the other is either a tourist facility or a community facility. As a community facility it may overlap with other available centres in the regeneration plan.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Garavogue Villas Community Mee+ng Room -­‐ shared use of lodge Garavogue Villas

Garavogue Villas

Tonaphubble

Tonaphubble

Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Responses to Ques+on 10b by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Garavogue Villas Community Mee+ng Room -­‐ converted house

Stage 3

70

Doorly Park / Mar9n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

Responses to Ques+on 10b by Area

Page 60

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Quality of the Roads, Streets and Urban Spaces Urban Design Ideas 11 - 14 Overview The following ideas were presented 11 12 13

14

St. Anne’s Place landscape : new tree planting here and along Cranmore Road Devins Drive improvements : landscaped as an Avenue and new traffic light controlled crossing Cranmore Road improvements: ESB frontage enhanced - new planting and pavement treatment and Ray McSharry Park boundary wall - replace with railings and widen pavement Cemetery carpark access off lay-by to small car park on existing pitch area, cemetery expansion is possible as well

Description This ideas will look at improved pedestrian surfaces, landscape margins with tree planting, improved public boundary conditions, public lighting and traffic management design interventions. It is important to integrate these proposals into the overall Masterplan to include new road layouts, pedestrian and cycle routes at critical interventions on Devins Drive particularly.

Overview : Urban Design Ideas Ques4onnaire Feedback Ques4ons 11-­‐14 11 St. Anne's Place Landscape

12 Devins Drive Improvements Support Would not Support No Comment

13 Cranmore Road Improvements

14 Cemetery Carpark

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Support for these ideas ranged from 74% - 81%

The following pages analyse the feedback for each idea in detail.

See appendix A for full range of comments expressed in relation to these ideas and our overview chat of the various issues raised in this section of the questionnaire.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 61

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Quality of the Roads, Streets and Urban Spaces Question 11

81% support

St Anne’s Place Landscape

What was proposed?

New tree planting here and along Cranmore Road.

Why? To make this place and link to the East City Area more attractive, without losing much parking.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a high level of support for this idea. The majority of feedback in the comments received in relation to St. Anne’s landscaping proposal was very positive. The public recognize the benefits to improving the public perception of St. Anne’s and Cranmore Road with tree planting and hard and soft landscaping. There are concerns about the planting being maintained over the long term and that sufficient funds would be provided for this.

There has been a suggestion that road widening and increased parking should be funded as part of any traffic upgrades in this area.

What did the Design Team learn?

There is a clear recognition that this space could be made more attractive and potentially change the wider public perception of Cranmore. The landscape proposals should be carefully considered with careful selection of species.

Carparking requirements could be reduced and maintenance must be made part of the design and must be funded on an ongoing basis.

plan highlighting St Anne’s Place landscape

St Anne's Place Landscape Support

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “More parking around Government building / Widen road between Cranmore and St. Anne’s.”

“Liberal Tree planting throughout the whole area, coupled with beds of perennial colourful shrubs will make a major impact in softening the various streetscapes.”

Would not Support No Comment 0

“I think it’s important to choose the trees carefully and not just ‘plant a few’ of the same type along the avenue.”

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 11

“I think we have enough trees in our area.”

“Concern regarding tree planting – will they have sufficient funding for maintenance – blocked drains.”

St Anne's Place Landscape

“The current arrangement often causes congestion and delays, particularly at Dunnes Stores roundabout” “Fully agree with softening the hard landscape”

Garavogue Villas

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar9n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

100

Responses to Ques+on 11 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 62

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Quality of the Roads, Streets and Urban Spaces

74% support

Question 12 Devins Drive Improvements What was proposed?

Landscaped as an Avenue and new traffic light controlled crossing.

Why? Residents suggested tree planting to reduce bleakness of street and asked for safer and easier crossing points.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a high level of support for this idea. The feedback by the public shows a high level of support for landscape improvements and pedestrian and traffic upgrades to Devins Drive. Many people see a need for traffic lights at critical junctions to create safer crossing points.

Cycle lanes are also a common request, with some softening of the street edge with planting and trees to enhance the overall appearance.

What did the Design Team learn? plan highlighting Devins Drive improvements

There is wide support for both hard and soft landscaping review of Devins Drive that could deal with both the pedestrian and the car.

The boundary on either side of the road could be relandscaped with the introduction of clear pedestrian zones and traffic management in the form of traffic lights at critical cross over points. The provision of an integrated overall plan for the whole of Devins Drive should be considered.

Devins Drive Improvements Support

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Excellent proposals – Ensure cycle paths prioritised if not already.”

“Traffic lights at Cleveragh entrance of Devins Drive.”

“More bicycle lanes are needed.”

Would not Support No Comment

“More car parks needed. More traffic restrictions.”

0

“Recently erected barrier at Pedestrian crossing ludicrous!

Any planting that would soften landscape would be welcome.”

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 12

“Why wait? This safe crossing is needed now.”

Devins Drive Improvements

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 12 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 63

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Quality of the Roads, Streets and Urban Spaces

78% support

Question 13 Cranmore Road Improvements What was proposed?

ESB Frontage Enhanced: new planting and pavement treatment.

Ray McSharry Boundary Wall: replace with railings and widen pavement.

Why? Residents wanted pavement to be wider and more attractive to use.

Residents requested a better safer footpath. This is a hidden open space so railings would make walking past pleasurable rather than alienating.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a high level of support for this idea. Improvements to lighting, planting and paving are considered good ideas by the public. However some question the expense of railings by Sean Fallon Park.

What did the Design Team learn?

plan highlighting Cranmore Road improvements

There was considerable support for the proposals. Some of the public were not aware of the attractive green space behind the boundary wall. The improvements need to be well coordinated between pedestrian improvements to widen footpaths, public lighting, safe road crossing and new boundary wall.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Cranmore Road Improvements Support

“Cranmore Road Improvements – great idea.”

“Ray McSharry Park needs to be used more”

Would not Support

“More lights on Cranmore Road.”

“If McSharry Park had railings people would stand on pavement and watch matches and therefore not pay to get in.”

No Comment 0

“More bicycle lanes needed”

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 13

“Great idea - especially because junction very icy in winter” Full list of comments are at appendix A

Cranmore Road Improvements Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 13 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 64

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Quality of the Roads, Streets and Urban Spaces

80% support

Question 14 Cemetery Car Park What was proposed?

Access off lay-by to small car park on existing pitch area, cemetery expansion is possible as well.

Why? Mourners parking causes traffic congestion and parking on busy road for funerals is undignified.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a high level of support for this idea. The public have responded very favourably to proposals for parking on Cemetery Road.

The feedback demonstrates that there is a need for parking during funerals and this will improve traffic in and around the area.

A number have expressed concerns about the cemeteries capacity in the up coming years.

What did the Design Team learn? plan highlighting existing pitch as location for Cemetery Carpark in yellow

There is huge support for the proposal. This will address a short and medium term problem. However SCC will need to have a long term solution for the expansion of the cemetery which can be supported with appropriate numbers of carparking.

Cemetery Carpark

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “As the cemetery is central to all our lives, some sort of rethinking should be exercised to accommodate mourner parking and access at a time of great distress.”

“Strongly support cemetery improvements and widening of paths. Also suggest more litter bins for dog dirt on main roads and Doorly walk.”

“Would support parking on Cemetery Road.”

Support Would not Support No Comment

“What will happen when Cemetery is full (10 years).”

0

“Not adequate parking at Cemetery for large funerals.”

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 14

“Cemetery parking improvement badly needed.”

“I presume a new entrance to cemetery will be created on Cleveragh Rd and the old one on Cemetery Rd would be closed?”

Cemetery Carpark

“Leave as cemetery, use the racecourse parking” “Re no 14 - need to ensure cemetery extension is not compromised” Full list of comments are at appendix A

Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar9n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

100

Responses to Ques+on 14 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 65

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access and Links Urban Design Ideas 15 - 20 Overview The proposal is to develop new links to open up some of the cul de sacs for pedestrian, cycles and cars to create a convenient network of links for pedestrians, cyclist and vehicular movement.

Support ranges from 61% - 75% for the different ideas.

Overview : Urban Design Ideas Ques4onnaire Feedback Ques4ons 15-­‐20 15 New Link via Mercy Lands to Chapel Hill and Town to Chapel Hill and Town 16 New Road Link: Joe McDonnell Drive to Chapel Hill and Town

17 New Link through Browns Field

Support Would not Support

18 New Avenue Link through the Centre Block Site

No Comment

19 Gaol Road to Cranmore Road Link

20 Garavogue Villas Access 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Support for these ideas ranged from 61% - 75%

The following pages analyse the feedback for each idea in detail.

See appendix A for full range of comments expressed in relation to these ideas and our overview chat of the various issues raised in this section of the questionnaire.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 66

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access and Links

62% support

Question 15 New Link via Mercy Lands to Chapel Hill and Town

What was proposed?

New vehicle link from Devins and Geldof Drive to Chapel Hill. This requires a land swap with the School and replacement of Sean Fallon pitch on Cleveragh Regional Park site with new changing rooms. The existing school boundary wall would be replaced with more attractive railings. School drop and collect arrangements will be made easier.

Why? Residents identified need for better access to the School and Gym. The Plan shows a safe route for children and direct access to the School and to the City beyond. The new connections to Chapel Hill will provide pedestrian, cycle and vehicle access.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments While there is a good level of support for links to Mercy College and Chapel Hill at 62%, there is some opposition to developments that impact on residents of Geldof Drive. plan highlighting New Link via Mercy Lands to Chapel Hill and Town

Concerns about increased traffic and anti-social behaviour in the area were expressed, as well as changes to the character of this neighbourhood.

While the benefits to the overall community maybe apparent, the residents in the Geldof Drive area would be opposed to a road which was for a traffic link.

What did the Design Team learn?

While there is considerable support in the wider community for this link, there is a view that it should be carefully managed from a traffic perspective. Some residents are opposed to any trafficked road and in some cases any new development which would reduce their residential amenity.

All linking options and traffic proposals should be carefully analysed.

New Link via Mercy Lands to Chapel Hill and Town Support Would not Support No Comment

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

0

20

“New links are a very good idea. An estate the size of Cranmore needs better access to main roads.”

60

80

100

120

140

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 15

“Clearly the new road links particularly through the Mercy and Chapel Hill will result in an increase in traffic through the estate. This does not make sense as Cranmore has a lot of children playing in the area and the increase in traffic could result in more accidents.”

“If new road goes through Geldof Drive many residents will want to be rehoused / bought out. The reason for many choosing to buy homes on this road is because of the view, the fact it’s a cul de sac with no houses facing, is a quiet area with no antisocial activity. Plans would completely destroy this.”

40

New Link via Mercy Lands to Chapel Hill and Town Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble

“I strongly oppose road through Geldof Drive.”

“I positively agree with extension of Geldof drive and enhancement of same connecting with Pilkington Terrace.”

“You should look at removing and replacing the long boundary wall of the Mercy College in Chapel Hill, with railings, as the wall is long and ugly”

Doorly Park / Mar:n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore

Full list of comments are at appendix A

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Responses to Ques+on 15 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 67

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access and Links

62% support

Question 16 New Road Link: Joe McDonnell Drive to Chapel Hil and Town What was proposed?

A new wide cycle/path street from Joe McDonnell Drive to Chapel Hill. To achieve the Joe McDonnell Link requires acquisition and removal of 4 houses.

Why? To make better connections between Joe Mc Donnell Drive and town, providing a safe direct route

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There is a good level of support at 62%. While the statistics suggest overall support for improved access links it is clear from the feedback that there is also some opposition to the proposal.

Issues expressed by the residents of Joe McDonnell include increased traffic, anti-social behaviour and the loss of four households.

Most who commented on the link in a positive way suggested that vehicles not be allowed to pass through, that it should be proposed as a pedestrian link. plan highlighting New Road Link

What did the Design Team learn?

While there is considerable support for providing a link there are concerns expressed as to the status of the route with many residents proposing pedestrian and gate links rather than cars. There is also concerns at the loss of four houses in McDonnell Drive.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Road link from McDonnell Drive stay as footpath/cycle path not to be used for cars even. Traffic use on that path/area would have a negative impact on what should be a safe area for pedestrians.”

“I have lived in Joe McDonnell Drive for 18 years and find the need for a link road unnecessary as it is disturbing a strong community by removing the 4 houses.”

New Road Link: Joe McDonnell Drive to Chapel Hill and Town Support Would not Support No Comment 0

20

Full list of comments are at appendix A

60

80

100

120

140

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 16

“Should be used as proposed for walking/cycling not traffic.

Fear traffic would turn McDonnell Drive into a ‘rat run’.”

“New links are a very good idea. An estate the size of Cranmore needs better access to main roads.”

40

New Road Link: Joe McDonnell Drive to Chapel Hill and Town Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar:n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Responses to Ques+on 16 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 68

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access and Links

69% support

Question 17 New Link Through Brown’s Field What was proposed?

New link through Browns Field providing good access to facilities such as I.T. Sligo, Regional Hospital via future new bridge. Opening up lands within Browns Field area and providing good connections to facilities.

Why? To provide better connections between Cranmore and facilities such as the IT and Hospital.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a good level of support for this idea at 69%. The Brown’s Field link is seen by many members of the public as an extension of the bridge proposal.

Issues with traffic around Dunnes and Aldi is highlighted a number of times.

Opposition is expressed mainly from Doorly Park, Martin Savage and Garavogue residents, who feel the link will draw traffic from Cranmore into their area. plan highlighting new link through Brown’s Field

What did the Design Team learn?

While there is wide support for this initiative there are many concerns related to traffic. Some members of the public see this link road as opening up Browns Field for new development, others see it as an extension of the proposed bridge traffic. The actual line of the route needs to be carefully considered to maximise the mixed use development opportunity and to retain Carnsfort House and surrounding mature trees.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

New Link Through Browns Field Support Would not Support

“Great to use Brown’s Field for access to Bridge.”

“Keep a space for safe use of quad bikes.”

No Comment

“Link road to meet up with Langan Drive.”

0

“New road link not to impact on walled garden of Carnsfort.”

“Make sure there are good footpaths and cycle paths on any new road” “We will have a busy road to the front of our homes and then an extra one across from us too! Surely people from Cranmore could use the other routes, there is not a huge difference distance wise! Better access? It takes one minute to come around the other way!!”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 17

“Need another road. Something needs to be done about traffic at Dunnes and Aldi.”

“Suggestion 17 is ridiculous”

20

New Link Through Browns Field Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 17 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 69

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access and Links Question 18 What was proposed?

61% support

New Avenue Link, through the Centre Block site

New Avenue Link, through the Centre Block site linking Devins Drive to route to Browns Field via Racecourse View

Why? To make better connection for the whole area

Overview of Themes and Sentiments While the statistics demonstrate support for the proposed new Avenue Link, the comments received in the feedback express a number of concerns.

An increase in traffic in residential areas is perceived to be the outcome of the new link, with delivery vehicles entering the area

What did the Design Team learn?

There is good support for creating a linking road at this point in the Masterplan. The advantage of the elimination of Carroll Drive and its replacement with this more central road allows for improved connectivity. However there are concerns at the level and scale of traffic proposed. The need for a traffic managed junction on Devins Drive is important.

plan highlighting New Avenue link

New Avenue Link Through the Centre Block Site

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Concerns re an extra road as it might be used as a ‘rat run’.”

“There will have to be a 3 tonne limit on the traffic coming through Cranmore from the bridge.”

“Links through Brown’s Field and Avenue link through Centre Block site do not have sufficient corridors to access them. There is no available option to feed traffic from Pearse Rd / Tonaphubble. It would result in heavy traffic and goods vehicles in residential areas.”

Support Would not Support No Comment

“There are enough roads in existence – it would take one minute to use the existing road!!!”

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 18

Full list of comments are at appendix A

New Avenue Link Through the Centre Block Site Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Responses to Ques+on 18 by Area Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 70

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access and Links

73% support

Question 19 Gaol Road to Cranmore Road Link What was proposed?

Gaol Road to Cranmore Road Link: a missing connection that would be a safe and useful pedestrian link to the River

Why? New connection, like the Aldi link, would attract footfall, especially if Gaol becomes a visitor attraction.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There is considerable support for the proposed road link in the public feedback. The easy access for fire trucks is seen as a positive move and a solution to some traffic problems that arise in the area.

What did the Design Team learn?

This could be an important and well used route previously a ‘desire line’ link between Gaol Road, Aldi retail development and Cranmore Road. It would open up an additional vista onto Ray McSharry Park and could be quite attractive. The emerging access arrangement provides an additional advantage.

Consider linking this initiative with the environmental improvements on Cranmore Road.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Gaol road link could prove very beneficial for part-time firefighters if an automatic bollard was in place for the 8-9 staff who would use it. Traffic would flow in a one-way direction towards the gaol only.”

“Yes its existing – closer potential for development.”

plan highlighting Gaol Road to Cranmore Road Link

Gaol Road to Cranmore Road Link Support

“Not if road goes down by boundary fencing of Ray Mac Sharry Park.”

Would not Support

“This would eliminate fireman having to negotiate Aldi, Dunnes goods yard, Dunne Stores Roundabout, St. Anne’s Church and Sligo School Project when responding to calls.”

No Comment 0

Full list of comments are at appendix A

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 19

Gaol Road to Cranmore Road Link Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 19 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 71

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Access and Links Question 20 What was proposed?

75% support

Garavogue Villas Access : Restriction Signs

Garavogue Villas Access: restriction signs

Why? Residents asked for ways to keep out misrouted trucks.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a high level of support for this idea. Most of the feedback in relation to Access at Garavogue Villas has come from residents in this area.

The residents have concerns that the new bridge will cause increased traffic through their neighbourhood.

The need for signage prohibiting large vehicles to pass is considered by some unnecessary as the access point is too narrow.

What did the Design Team learn?

This initiative is widely supported and considered essential to protect the residential amenity of Garavogue Villas.

plan highlighting Garavogue Villas access

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Garavogue Villas Access

“Could do putting more bins in the Garavogue area, badly needed.”

“If I had a truck I wouldn’t even try to drive through Garavogue as its too narrow.”

“Garavogue is too narrow for trucks or buses to come down – only small buses can come through. The houses are lovely – will create a wild street, and it’s a lovely cul de sac, ridiculous idea.”

“With the bridge approved, I feel that need for traffic restriction and tonnage as would not like for our street to become a short cut.”

Support Would not Support No Comment 0

Full list of comments are at appendix A

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 20

Garavogue Villas Access Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar8n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

20

40

60

80

Responses to Ques+on 20 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 72

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Getting the Best Potential out of the Vacant and Potential Sites in the Area Urban Design Ideas 21 - 27 Overview The following ideas were presented: • • •

• • • •

Redeveloping Mercy School Lands: a new green space with play area at the top of Chapel Hill; opportunity for new housing Cranmore Road Cleared Site: new residential (apartments) with open space, overlooking pedestrian link to Cranmore Place.

Brown’s Field Developments: new mixed use sites with vehicle link from Cranmore Road to Racecourse View. Woodlands and walls of Carnsfoot House would be preserved. Copse could provide space for adventure play. Mixed uses could include employment, civic facilities, education and residential.

Former Maisonettes Site: this is zoned as Existing Residential, we are suggesting that this is the best use of this site.

Centre Block Site: a new location for residential, community and medical facilities, and with quality open space. Carroll Drive extinguished: surface removed so amenity space of Cleared Site and East Mound make one large quality open space.

Development Site behind Globe House and Mercy School: this site could be useful for Mercy School expansion.

Cleveragh Drive Re-Zoning: proposed that next Development Plan rezones these sites to Residential .

Overview : Urban Design Ideas Ques4onnaire Feedback Ques4ons 21-­‐27 21 Redeveloping Mercy School Lands 22 Cranmore Road Cleared Site 23 Brown's Field Developments Support 24 Former MaisoneIes Site

Would not Support No Comment

25 Centre Block Site 26 Development Site behind Globe House and Mercy School 27 Cleveragh Drive Re-­‐Zoning 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Support for these ideas ranged from 59% - 70%

The following pages analyse the feedback for each idea in detail.

See appendix A for full range of comments expressed in relation to these ideas and our overview chat of the various issues raised in this section of the questionnaire.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 73

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Getting the Best Potential out of the Vacant and Potential Sites in the Area Question 21 Redeveloping Mercy School Lands

62% support

What was proposed?

Redeveloping Mercy School Lands: a new green space with play area at the top of Chapel Hill; opportunity for new housing site

Why? Makes an attractive urban place for existing and new residents and provides better spaces for school

Overview of Themes and Sentiments While the statistic numbers are positive overall for the proposed development of Mercy School lands, many residents of Geldof and Joe McDonnell Drive have stated their opposition.

Some members of the public have recognised the need for more homes in the area, however the proposal for Mercy School lands is viewed as having a negative impact on privacy and external views for people in the neighbourhood.

Alternative suggestions include low density bungalows for elderly residents or a community function such as allotments.

plan highlighting redeveloping Mercy School lands

What did the Design Team learn?

While there is broad support for this proposal, the comments showed it is not straight forward. Those living closer to it on Geldof Drive are not in favour and fear increased traffic congestion in their quiet cul de sac. Others saw that there is a great potential for the school end on this. The type of road access whether it is pedestrian, cycle or cars is very important for some residents. Others would prefer not to demolish any viable homes.

Redeveloping Mercy School Lands Support Would not Support

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “But don’t knock houses. No more housing in and around Cranmore.”

No Comment

“Don’t need any more play areas. Plenty open spaces for play area, a nice quiet area would be preferred.”

0

20

“In any green areas that are proposed as residential sits bungalows should be developed for the older generation of Cranmore. A scheme could be developed where the current 2 storey houses is traded for a bungalow which should cater for the needs of senior citizens.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

60

80

100

120

140

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 21

“A good idea in Geldof Drive would be allotments for planting greens and veg. Would be great for people with no garden space. A charge would be paid yearly for people who would like to use it.”

“Make accommodation affordable for people. Decrease housing list, supply social housing. Housing should be a priority for Sligo. Everyone deserves a home.”

40

Redeveloping Mercy School Lands Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Responses to Ques+on 21 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 74

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Getting the Best Potential out of the Vacant and Potential Sites in the Area Question 22 Cranmore Road Cleared Site

59% support

What was proposed?

Cranmore Road Cleared Site: new residential (apartments) with open space, overlooking pedestrian link to Cranmore Place.

Why? Convenient central city site with good access to amenities, ideal for small apartments.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was support for this idea. Some comments expressed opposition to apartments in this area. Alternative suggestions included accessible housing for the elderly / disabled or a green park.

While the numbers of support suggest the public are in favour of a residential development, the community have stated a preference for medium to low density strategy.

What did the Design Team learn?

There is an appreciation that this is an important site and that there is support for a residential development.

plan highlighting Cranmore Road cleared site

The debate is around the type of residential development.

There is also a concern for a new location for the men’s group facility.

Cranmore Road Cleared Site

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Keep as park, strongly opposed to this.”

Support

“Where is Abbeyquarter Men’s Group to be moved?”

“Accessible housing, not many children in Cranmore Place: not suitable for family accommodation.”

Would not Support

“Only if accommodation is of mixed use i.e. Social / Private & Affordable.”

No Comment

“Prefer to see houses – more family orientation – more community in houses.”

0

60

80

100

120

140

Cranmore Road Cleared Site

“I thought the idea of regeneration for Cranmore was to reduce the number of houses / people in one area?”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

40

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 22

“I suggest that all residential developments (22,24,25) be low to medium density as overall, the area has suffered from its high density and lack of adequate facilities and from general environment.”

“Very good opportunity to have ‘feature’ building as entrance to Devins Drive”

20

Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar:n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Responses to Ques+on 22 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 75

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Getting the Best Potential out of the Vacant and Potential Sites in the Area Question 23 Brown’s Field Developments

70% support

What was proposed?

Brown’s Field Developments: new mixed use sites with vehicle link from Cranmore Road to Racecourse View.

Woodlands and walls of Carnsfort House would be preserved. Copse could provide space for adventure play.

Mixed uses could include employment, civic facilities, education and residential.

Why? Publicly owned land asset that needs market interest to fund development. New links created to Racecourse and to future developments behind Aldi and on Business Park Sites, provides good connections for residents in the area

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There is a good level of support at 70%. Some of the feedback recognises the potential for Brown’s Field, particularly for residential or as a centre of training and leisure.

Concerns about the increase in traffic were expressed and the increase in anti-social behaviour it may encourage. plan highlighting Brown’s Field developments

While Sligo Racecourse is in favour of regeneration efforts in the area, these efforts should not interfere with their activities.

Brown's Field Developments

What did the Design Team learn?

While these lands in public ownership represent a considerable asset there is mixed views as to how it should be best developed. There is a high level of support for redevelopment but there is also uncertainty of what kind of mixed development might work. There is uncertainty as to where any road links might connect to the rest of the network.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Support Would not Support No Comment

“Brown’s Field / Central Block site both have the potential to be developed as a community gardens / apartments to create an opportunity for training in horticulture and leisure gardening and small scale food production for all ages.”

0

“Skateboard park / motorcross track” “Browns field may be a route via edge of Racecourse and some demolished houses to Pearse Rd.” Full list of comments are at appendix A

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 23

“More planning required for Brown’s field to avoid bringing traffic to this area. East Area is currently cut off from access to town centre JFK Parade should be changed to allow access to Bridge St. for resident of this area. This could be achieved quickly.”

“Browns field will be used for antisocial activity, leave it alone.”

20

Brown's Field Developments Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Responses to Ques+on 23 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 76

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Getting the Best Potential out of the Vacant and Potential Sites in the Area Question 24 Former Maisonettes Site

65% support

What was proposed?

Former Maisonettes Site: this is zoned as Existing Residential, we are suggesting that this is the best use of this site

Why? Centrally located publicly owned residential land is a long term asset for the City and community, provides a great location for residential use, with easy access to quality facilities such as Doorly Park, and Garavogue river

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a good level of support for this idea. Feedback on the proposed development for the Maisonettes site was mixed, some were negative and some focussed on the potential for low density housing.

Other suggestions included are a green park, allotments or housing for the elderly.

What did the Design Team learn? plan highlighting former Maisonettes site

While there is substantial overall support for the redevelopment of this site those who live closest to it and have given written feedback are generally negative. We believe that there is support for private housing or for housing for the elderly.

Former Maisone9es Site

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Support

“How many houses would be built on it?”

“Should include wider Boulevard style connection to Doorly Park form Cranmore to visually and physically link residential to green space.”

Would not Support

“Allotment for growing – re former maisonettes – left as green area – especially if loosing Browns field. Facilities to provide jobs needed as Brown field – not more council houses.”

No Comment 0

“Green space at maisonettes is fine, or else put centre to suit need of Doorly Park residents – suit age profiles a tea room, a room for health or for the elderly.”

“Sorry, I cannot support any of these suggestions. The former maisonette site needs consultation with all the residents of our area and let us decide.”

80

100

120

140

Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar:n Savage

“Doorly Park is losing a large green area due to the bridge, leave this empty”

Other

“Maisonettes site should be used for residential”

60

Former Maisone7es Site

“An allotment for the residents in Martin Savage and Doorly Park would be nice to see in the old Maisonette site.”

“Re no 24 - a medi centre for all of eastern area”

40

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 24

“Low density, for older people and for people with disability.

Supported housing.”

“You will be taking away our other green area so leave this empty and take down the fences around it.”

20

Support Would not Support No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Responses to Ques+on 24 by Area

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 77

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Getting the Best Potential out of the Vacant and Potential Sites in the Area Question 25 Centre Block Site

65% support

What was proposed?

Centre Block Site: a new location for residential, community and medical facilities, and with quality open space. Carroll Drive extinguished: surface removed so amenity space of Cleared Site and East Mound make one large quality open space.

Why? Residents spoke of need for a new centre, for medical facilities and for new play spaces for all ages. New all weather pitch works well on corner with Devins Drive and mounds provide banked seating. A good location for a community resource. New Abbeyquarter location oversees the outdoor play spaces. Housing need is documented in the Stage 2 report.

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a good level of support for this idea. While support is given for the development for recreational and community facilities many members of the public feel that any additional residential units on the Central Block site would be a step backwards.

Alternative suggestions included housing for the elderly or disabled, with single storey units only.

plan highlighting Centre Block site

What did the Design Team learn?

While there is strong support for the redevelopment of the central space there is mixed views as to how to achieve this. Many in the community like the space as is, others would like to see formal recreational spaces. However some residents would like to see special needs residential units and medical facilities in addition to playing fields. It is hoped that solutions could be developed which could address all of these requirements in Stage 4.

Centre Block Site Support Would not Support

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Derelict houses at McNeil drive – knocked or opened.”

No Comment

“No more houses need to be built in this area!”

0

“Residential should not be more than single storey houses.”

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 25

“This site for leisure use only. Children’s games etc. seats.”

“Houses for elderly and disabled only.”

“Support centre block site proposal but not for residential use. Wasted a lot of money rehousing and knocking done previous houses in order to de-congest. Building more homes would be a step backwards.”

“The centre block area needs to be equipped with sports equipment and a all weather pitch – stuff for all ages. Add a walk-way and benches for elderly people to go and sit and watch the grand kids.”

“Need for a new centre a focal point – develop create joined up walking routes with maps.”

“It is very important that Cranmore Community have a central hub, where the community can gather and pursue educational and passive activities.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Date issued: February 2015

Centre Block Site Garavogue Villas

Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support No Comment

Other

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Responses to Ques+on 25 by Area

Stage 3

Page 78

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Getting the Best Potential out of the Vacant and Potential Sites in the Area Question 26 Development Site behind Globe 65% support House and Mercy School What was proposed?

Development Site behind Globe House and Mercy School: this site could be useful for Mercy School expansion.

Why? If Mercy Link Rd went ahead Mercy School facilities would need to expand, so additional land could be acquired

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was a strong level of support for this idea. There was only one comment made in relation to the proposed development of the site behind Globe House. (see above)

What did the Design Team learn?

The project was strongly supported in the general questionnaire responses.

There was little written commentary in this section to interpret.

In the opinion of the team the remoteness of the project from immediate residential neighbourhoods made it less of an issue for strong negative sentiment. However in light of a redeveloped educational campus these adjacent lands could be extremely useful. These lands could also provide the necessary on site carparking and a safe drop off and pick up which might elevate traffic congestion at peak times.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “Don’t know, my children grown up.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

plan highlighting development site behind Globe House and Mercy School

Development Site Behind Globe House and Mercy School Support Would not Support No Comment 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 26

Development Site Behind Globe House and Mercy School Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Responses to Ques+on 26 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 79

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Getting the Best Potential out of the Vacant and Potential Sites in the Area Question 27 Cleveragh Drive Re-Zoning 59% support What was proposed?

Cleveragh Drive Re-Zoning: proposed that next Development Plan rezones these sites to Residential.

Why? With Racecourse, Doorly Park and Cleveragh Regional Park now attractive destinations, the lands lend themselves to Residential use (R2 Low/Medium Density).

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was support for this idea at 59%. In the comments there are varied public views about what the Cleveragh Drive site should be used for, with no distinct idea emerging.

Some feel that any development in this area will impact on its character, while others suggest a residential, leisure or sustainable energy scheme or light industry or a centre for citizenship.

What did the Design Team learn?

The idea was supported in the general questionnaire responses.

plan highlighting Cleveragh Drive re-zoning

The written responses did not have a unified character with sentiment ranging from the ‘do nothing’ to protect adjoining amenity to the use of the site for residential, industrial / employment generation uses.

There were suggestions that any new developments could be an opportunity for environmentally focused projects.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “With sustainable energy, low density (link to local development).”

“It would take the place and quietness from it – for residential views.”

Cleveragh Drive Re-­‐Zoning Support Would not Support No Comment

“Residential site in this area should be sold at reasonable cost to suitable tenants of Council / Local Authority.”

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 27

“Cleveragh Drive re zoning – should be kept industrial.”

“Must be held as park land.”

Cleveragh Drive Re-­‐Zoning

“Re no 27: no more houses please” “Also maybe a centre teaching citizenship” Garavogue Villas

Full list of comments are at appendix A Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar:n Savage

Support Would not Support No Comment

Other

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Responses to Ques+on 27 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 80

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exploring Options for Sustainable Energy Masterplan Design Idea 28 Overview Idea proposed was for the Racecourse - Central Site to create a recreation use and/or energy farm.

Overview : Masterplan Design Ideas Ques6onnaire Feedback Ques6on 28 Overview : Masterplan Design Ideas Ques6onnaire Feedback Ques6on 28

Support Would not Support

28 Racecourse -­‐ Central Site

No Comment 0

50

100

150 Support Would not Support

28 Racecourse -­‐ Central Site

No Comment 0 50 Support for this idea was 67%

100

150

The following pages analyse the feedback for each idea in detail.

See appendix A for full range of comments expressed in relation to these ideas and our overview chat of the various issues raised in this section of the questionnaire.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 81

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Exploring Options for Sustainable Energy Question 28

67% support

Racecourse - Central Site

What was proposed?

Racecourse - Central Site: a recreation use and/or energy farm

Why? Vacant land publicly owned. Potential for Ground Source Heat Pump scheme to provide a sustainable energy resource

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There was support for this idea at 67%. Comments considered a move to a more sustainable community to be a positive idea, but also express some concerns about implementation, the costs and location.

The initial cost of developing such a scheme and who would directly benefit are questions that have been raised.

Also the impact on the proposed central site which was described as a wetland habitat.

What did the Design Team learn?

plan highlighting Racecourse - central site

The project was strongly supported in the general questionnaire responses.

There was almost universal support for an environmental energy initiative in this location. A number of respondents felt that any energy oriented projects should not lose the potential for this site to be enhanced for family / community uses. A number of outdoor activity uses were proposed.

Some caution was noted that environmental projects were costly to build and operate and that assurance should be sought that anything of this nature to be developed should have firm commitments to capital and ongoing funding.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Racecourse -­‐ Central Site Support Would not Support No Comment

“The whole area of sustainable energy is a huge challenge for all of us for the future. What happens when the oil runs out?”

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Total Number of Responses to Q28

“Even the energy farms can bring problems, land erosion noise.”

“This sounds like a scheme that may run out of money half way through leaving a half developed site facility.”

Racecourse -­‐ Central Site

“Who would benefit from this energy farm?”

“Better education in benefits of sustainable energy sources.”

Garavogue Villas

“Energy efficiency initiatives are a ‘win’ for everyone where it counts most – financially.”

Tonaphubble

“Totally underutilized. Potential for family venue with activity e.g. Crazy golf / cycling circuit.”

Doorly Park / Mar;n Savage

“The central site in the Racecourse exists as a wetlands area and a wetlands habitat is proposed.”

Support Would not Support No Comment

Other

“The more sustainable energy the better.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Responses to Ques+on 28 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 82

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Housing Quality and Opportunity in the Area Masterplan Design Ideas 29 - 31 Overview The following ideas were presented: • • •

Collery Drive: build across the Collery Drive alley to close it off. Would require removal of 6 bungalows. Has an impact for existing residents: they would need new housing opportunities, possibly in redevelopment of centre block site.

Housing Improvements focussing on Energy Efficiency for the Cranmore Estate: Options to upgrade housing stock to a better energy rating.

Environmental improvements: A range of ideas are proposed.

Overview : Masterplan Design Ideas Ques6onnaire Feedback Ques6ons 29-­‐31

29 Collery Drive

Support

30 Housing Improvements Focussing on Energy Efficiency for the Cranmore Estate

Would not Support No Comment

31 Environmental Improvements

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Support for these ideas ranged from 62% - 74%

The following pages analyse the feedback for each idea in detail.

See appendix A for full range of comments expressed in relation to these ideas and our overview chat of the various issues raised in this section of the questionnaire.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 83

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Housing Quality and Opportunity in the Area

62% support

Question 29 Collery Drive What was proposed?

Collery Drive: build across the Collery Drive alley to close it off. Would require removal of 6 bungalows. Has an impact for existing residents: they would need new housing opportunities, possibly in redevelopment of centre block site.

Why? To extinguish a difficult to manage alley and to provide new housing to meet needs

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There is support for this idea at 62%. The opinions expressed in relation to this project are divided. Some feel that the current site plan layout is the cause of ‘harassment’ and anti-social behaviour and that the proposed scheme should be endorsed quickly.

Others suggested that the solution is to simply wall off the area and leave the existing houses in place.

What did the Design Team learn?

plan highlighting Collery Drive

The project was strongly supported in the general questionnaire responses. However other solutions should be reviewed.

There was a strong endorsement of the fact that the lane was a location with little passive observation and is currently the focus of anti-social behaviour. It was also noted by a number of residents that the actual connection to Cranmore in an improved form was important for the residents of Collery Drive.

Many respondents felt that more modest interventions such as walls and fences could eradicate these problems with less cost and less need for house demolitions.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Collery Drive Support Would not Support No Comment

“I’m a resident of Collery Drive bungalows: everyone is harassed. It can be lovely during the day when kids are at school but at night, it’s a problem for the old people. I am concerned about the time-frame. How long will this take and what will happen in the meantime? What if this would be the last project to be done, how will we cope in the meantime? Can they put up temporary security in the meantime? We need privacy and security. What will we do with our houses in the meantime, I’ve done lots of improvements to my house.”

“Can the alley not be closed on Collery Drive without the pointless exercise of knocking down 6 homes and rebuilding elsewhere causing maximum disturbance.”

“Sheltered housing for the elderly and special needs.”

“Why take away existing housing and build more . . . Just build a wall instead.”

0

60

80

100

120

140

Collery Drive Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar:n Savage Other

“I see no. 29 as a waste of time and money and creating pointless hassle for current residents. Can the alley not be closed without knocking down homes?”

Cranmore

Date issued: February 2015

40

Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 29

“I am a resident of Yeats Drive, I fully support this and we have no priority.”

Full list of comments are at appendix A

20

Support Would not Support No Comment

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Responses to Ques+on 29 by Area

Stage 3

Page 84

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Housing Quality and Opportunity in the Area

74% support

Question 30 Housing Improvements Focusing on Energy Efficiency

What was proposed?

Housing Improvements focusing on Energy Efficiency for the Cranmore Estate: Options to upgrade housing stock to a better energy rating

Why?

Housing is in need of improvements, will reduce impact of fuel poverty and energy costs for residents

Overview of Themes and Sentiments

There was strong support for this idea. The Energy Efficient upgrades of existing housing proposed is positively viewed.

Concerns have been raised by private residents not receiving the same benefit of those living in SCC housing.

Residents of Doorly Park, Martin Savage and Garavogue question why they have been omitted from the proposed upgrades.

What did the Design Team learn?

The idea was strongly supported in the general questionnaire responses, at 74%.

The need for environmental upgrades to the housing stock was strongly supported in the returned commentary. The primary focus of comments related to fairness and the selection of which houses would be subject to upgrade.

A number of respondents noted that due to the financial difficulties of both public and private residents that assistance should be given to both groups to avail of upgrade proposals.

Housing Improvements

A similar sentiment was expressed with regard to the geographic catchment for the upgrades, with several responses noting the narrow Cranmore focus to the proposals when they understood that the ambition of the project suggested a wider East City nature.

Housing Improvements Focussing on Energy Efficiency

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires “I would like to see more Environmental houses, use for example for future.”

Support

“Are housing improvements available to private tenants?”

“Any upgrades / improvements to housing should be available to private homeowners also. These are the people who have made their lives in Cranmore and have bought their homes. Any schemes should include everyone, it would be discrimination to exclude private households.”

Would not Support

No Comment

“Many people have their houses bought so nothing will be done for them but anyone in a Council house will get everything for nothing.”

“Essential for upgrade of existing housing stock before new development is built.”

“Why just for Cranmore if the regeneration is for the entire area?!”

“This makes me laugh. You speak about regeneration the East Ward, however, any ‘free stuff’ is only available to Cranmore!”

“Regarding housing improvement and heating and energy: a lot of houses in Garavogue are below standard and are in need of such schemes.”

“Any upgrades should include something like a 50 / 50 scheme.”

private

households,

0

120

140

160

Housing Improvements Focussing on Energy Efficiency Garavogue Villas Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar<n Savage

Support Would not Support

Other

No Comment

Cranmore 0

Full list of comments are at appendix A

Date issued: February 2015

20 40 60 80 100 Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 30

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Responses to Ques+on 30 by Area

Stage 3

Page 85

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Improving Housing Quality and Opportunity in the Area

74% support

Question 31 Environmental Improvements What was proposed?

Environmental improvements: A range of ideas are proposed

Why? Responding to issues raised in consultations last year, small scale improvements can make a big difference to local communities

Overview of Themes and Sentiments There is strong support for this idea at 74%. There is support for environmental improvements however there is some confusion as to what exactly this means. Some considered the proposals are not specific enough or explained in detail.

Suggestions included improvements to roads, pavement surfaces, security and landscape green areas.

What did the Design Team learn?

The project was strongly supported in the general questionnaire responses.

The responses sought more detail about the proposals and better definition of the locations where these works would take place. Comments were noted these projects are ideal for community employment. It was also noted that all age groups could participate in these projects. The Design Team need to identify actual locations for these proposals and be very specific with the community what types of projects are proposed.

Sample of Comments from Questionnaires

Environmental Improvements Support

“Could be interesting.” “… opportunities for training and employment and improve quality of life for residents and green friendly.”

“Specify what the Env. Improvements area – hard to support it – if not specified.”

Would not Support

No Comment

“Structural housing – special needs housing valuable, safe surfaces / footpath / security.”

0

20

“Why has landscaping not taken place?”

40 60 80 100 Total Number of Responses to Ques3on 31

120

140

160

“Issues: what people do with waste” Full list of comments are at appendix A

Environmental Improvements Garavogue Villas

Tonaphubble Doorly Park / Mar<n Savage

Support Would not Support No Comment

Other

Cranmore 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Responses to Ques+on 31 by Area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 86

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Sample of Comments

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 87

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Appendix A Full List of Comments

Model of Regeneration Area, view looking south west

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 88

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire Questions A - D

Conclusions from Public Consultation Process

Key

The general response to the overall vision for the Regeneration area was very positive. However this was largely in the Cranmore area with a more qualified support in the areas immediately surrounding Cranmore. This would indicate that these areas on the periphery of the Plan feel that they may not benefit as much from the Regeneration proposals. This could be a misunderstanding of the inherent potential of Masterplan proposals however this aspect must be addressed in Stage 4.

CM:

Cranmore

OTR:

Other

DP MS: Doorly Park / Martin Savage TP:

Tonaphubble

GV:

Garavogue Villas

Questionnaire Feedback : Breakdown by Areas Page 1 Questions A - D

SUPPORT

A Do you agree with the Vision for Regeneration proposed?

WOULD NOT SUPPORT

total DP CM OTR MS TP GV 62 70 11 5 6 154

NO COMMENT

DP CM OTR MS TP GV total 14 1 2 2 0 19

DP CM OTR MS TP GV total 8 4 17 0 3 32

Why? The Vision for Regeneration describes 3 KEY AIMS for the Regeneration Masterplan: all of the projects and initiatives (social, economic and physical) will be targetted to support the achievement of this vision.

B Social Plan for Regeneration Several themes and ideas are illustrated on the exhibition boards

64

66

8

7

8 153

3

1

3

0

1

8

17

8

19

0

0

44

C Economic Plan A number of potential initiatives are indicated on the exhibition boards

63

67

8

7

9 154

1

0

3

0

0

4

20

8

19

0

0

47

D Physical Plan 8 key action areas are identified:

60

65

9

6

6 146

9

0

3

0

0

12

15

10

18

1

3

47

o o o o o o o o

improving access to quality amenities and open spaces promoting historical assets in the area providing quality spaces for community facilities improving quality of the roads, streets and urban spaces improving access and links making the most of the vacant sites in the area exploring options for sustainable energy improving housing quality and opportunity in the area

Design Team analysis of comments (see chart below) : over 86 comments were made. For each page issues and nature of comments were assessed and charted. The following pages show the comments in full. In some places we had difficulty reading writing.

40

30

20

10

UPKEEP

HOMES

STREETS

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

OUTDOOR AMENITIES

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

Analysis of Written Comments : Page 1 of Questionnaire, Questions A - D

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 89

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS A - D

Cranmore - Comments to page 1 of questionnaire Access to education, training developed, allotments, enterprise units.

I would not like the Community Centre moved as it was built and paid for by community. Would not like more houses in the area. Mounds in John Fallon Drive to be redeveloped as previous ideas.

Object strongly to houses being built. There is too many already. Object strongly to building roads through the estate.

Traffic is bad enough without creating more. Object to proposed link between Joe McDonnell Drive and Geldof Drive.

Too many unsociable people will create disturbances, noise etc in a quiet (so far) area.

I would recommend placing emergency ambulance with fully trained medic at fire station as at present ambulance has to come from hospital through busy traffic then back through same.

Agree with house in Cranmore Place best use of space. Make all one bed houses into 2 bed so when you unable to look after yourself you can have someone stay.

Do not move Abbeyquarter Community. Change to a training centre with workshops.

Work on the small things, like landscaping. Get the parking sorted at the corner of Government Building. (ie parking, footpath).

Community Centre not moved. No more residential houses.

Park on John Fallon Park Site A. Would support some but not all B. Support Some C. Support Some D. Keep open Spaces Green. Sustainable energy - great idea.

Strongly opposed to Development as proposed of major green Field (Langan Dr, Devins Dr, & Caroll Dr). Current Abbeyquarter Community Centre should be expanded. Definite “NO” to any more houses in green field. Don’t need any more housing to replace green area. Keep Green Park in the heart of Cranmore and develop ???? as a key green amenity.

B. Support Some C. Improving access and links: NO WAY Keep greenfield at Langan Park/Devins Drive for recreation. Expand current Community Centre location.

D. Promoting a more friendly and secure environment and making people (families) feel more safe in and out of their homes would be to provide more camera’s. It might just create a couple of jobs?

If the Abbeyquarter was moved - would the building be changed with business units for local people eg ??? Office, welding units, fixing cars (lots of boys doing this in street already.

No new houses, previous houses knocked down to ease congestion.l Would just be moving the congestion to another (my) area, which is mainly home owners who purchased their homes specifically because of the open area/view in front that the prpposed plans would destroy.

Do not like proposed plans regarding geldof drive. As one of the few quiet streets I want it to stay that way. Not become a main thoroughfare through estate.

Support for citizens suffering from antisocial behaviour. Zero tolerance for antisocial activity.

I have not ticked the above boxes because i believe in doing so and agreeing to the proposed overall vision that i am contradicting my objections inside.

NO through road in Geldof Drive I would give General support for most of the ideas. My overriding thought is that there be no more houses built in Cranmore. This estate is just mellowing for the residents after nearly forty years. We do not need an influx of new blood or any more houses in one of the largest estates in the County.

No through road through Geldof!!!

They are too many changes in the Regeneration Masterplan. Instead the funding should be used to maintain and enhance the houses and open spaces that we already have. Small, manageable, and realistic actions need to be undertaken as I feel that too many changes will lose the essence of our community in Cranmore.

Would not agree with Geldof Drive becoming a through road.

Doorly Park / Martin Savage - Responses to page 1 of questionnaire I don't think "free spaces" should always be "filled up". Green patches and areas could be kept as they are

1 Regeneration without making the place worse for other areas. I can see a lot of benefits for Cranmore but Martin Savage/Doorly Park is worse off 2 Sometimes need to make things better for themselves!!!

3 You are putting roads through our green areas.

Regeneration, but not to make other areas worse. Not fair.

D. Enough roads, enough houses. Too much housing in one area caused the problems in Cranmore. Why knock down/buy houses to then suggest building more?????

1. Promoting historical assets in the area. Our very historical building is the Lodge and there is no plans to do anything with it. Leave maisonette area as it is.

C. Now for DPMSRVL???

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 90

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS A - D

Other - Responses to page 1 of questionnaire Strategy to Remove Alleyways

Excellent suggestions, everything is there Like Idea of Three lead ???

Roads. New Link between Joe McDonnell Dr & Devins - Racecourse View Link through Race Course to Sports Complex Bridge at Doorly Park should not be linked to economic regeneration of Cranmore.

Foot Bridge Between Geldof Drive and Chapel Hill, artics near Chapel Hill Re: Anti Social behaviour in particular drug related intimidation may need a more focused plan/intervention - coordination of agencies and clarification of roles and responsibilities.

Would like to see more mention of Asylum Seekers and residents of Globe House as they are within the re-generation area.

Excellent ideas - Collaborative and flexible approach required from all stakeholders to deliver the plan. Doesn’t all have to be done at once or step by step approach.

Extremely impressive and very friendly atmosphere - I call joy Re A. - Consult Re D. - Excellent, Excellent Excellent - opening up space to the whole community Improving Access to and from “interlinks” between residents and wider community is an excellent plan which needs to be supported - the outcomes of this supports greater integration between residents and wider environment in which they live Re A - Evident need for change that is inclusive Re C - Absence of DSP in Economic Plan – Income Adequacy - Stress support take up of welfare payments should read support income payment to maximise return to work/training.

D ???? And implement Development.

structure /process, locally driven, to encourage assist youth participation in training /

Re B Core skills - Basic coding /maintenance /and leisure and Time managed, ??????? Debt and money management courses All limited – Emphasis needed for Income support to return to work place rather than welfare.

Re C - Identify skills needs of Private and Public and target training in these areas Promote a walking trail from Town Centre - guided walks. Cafe/Meeting Area in Cranmore along River Re B. Need more time to study.

Re C. Need far more time to study – A LOT to take in.

Plenty of green areas - not maintained, lots of potential building sites. Residents like to be nearer the town centre.

Excellent display of material, very comprehensive.

It is my view that the proposed ideas will have a massive positive effect on the residents of the Regeneration in particular the residents of Cranmore Estate. _ Will achieve the necessary integration into the city and the recreational facilities of Cleveragh.

Plan will clearly open up the living Environment for Residents of Cranmore.

Vision plan comprehensive The organising of inter generational social events and engagement to build social capital to ensure sustainable community development and integration. This will also create a sense of social inclusion and solidarity.

Literacy and numeracy programmes need to be encouraged in a positive way. Mobile Library now visiting Cranmore could be a cost effective stepping stone in this regard.

Ramps - NB. Money lending consider opening branch of the Credit Union in Cranmore, Also, possibility of moving Post Office from Castle Street to Cranmore Rd. Expand the services of the Racecourse View - Resource centre and possibly move to more central position eg. Primary Care Centre.

Reservation on Plan (B) Sport and Recreation is missing from the key Actions. Sports and Recreation should be an underpinning strategy as it has a very positive influence on all listed themes. Fundamental for the success of any strategy.

More support for local business in the area.

Very impressive and a great opportunity for the community.

Lots of thought has gone into it.

The vision for integrating of using arts in regeneration is articulated well.

Widen to include Library and heritage as they also have a key role in delivering regeneration in the broadest "Culture" themes.

I agree with all 8 key actions but those ( Physical plan - all bullet points) i feel are critical.

All of the above are welcome however, unless the issues around education, unemployment, single parent families and dependency are addressed, all of the proposals will not improve the real life experience of the residents of this area.

This has been the clear result of the Ballymun Regeneration scheme in Dublin.

Re A - perfectly happy with Doorly & Martin Savage Area as it is.

Re C Jobs Re D yes to promoting historical assets in the area - and exploring options for sustainable energy and extend Cranmore.

In a recession - money needs to be spent on projects creating jobs, - people have enough leisure facilities - need work.

Work in this area for residents would mean they can pay for use of soccer pitches etc and other amenities - as people who pay Tax in all private estates have to do. See no need for regeneration - what is unemployment figure in Cranmore?

County Sligo Racecourse support the overall ideas in the regeneration masterplan, however note that no new developments can interfere with our business of horseracing.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 91

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS A - D

Tonaphuble - Responses to page 1 of questionnaire

Traffic flow, survey to be carried out on Cleveragh Drive, Back Avenue of volume/and speed of Vehicular Traffic.

Re D. - improving quality of roads, streets and urban spaces - not adequate and improving links -X Parkland, leisure activity space, Back Avenue must not be a motorway as sole link with Pearse Rd., /Cleveragh.

The Cutting Edge of Urban Regeneration includes City Food Forests, Urban farms, Public Food "Growing Areas Eg. Incredible Edible Todmorden "SEATTLE's" City Park. Why not aim to include these far-sighted improvements.

Providing Food Security, Employment opportunities, Health benefits, Fostering Community Building. Providing Food Security, Employment opportunities, Health benefits, Fostering Community Building.

Garavogue - Responses to page 1 of questionnaire Re D - Garavogue Jail -! Would like to see more involvement of the Garavogue residents.

Re A - Garavogue ---- We'd like to see something for Garavogue.

Re A - Garavogue ------- We'd like to see something for Garavogue. We were at meetings and brought things up - but nothing happened - the trees and the falling leaves - terrible in winter-time- hard when youâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;re on your own, - sweeping Leaves.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 92

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire Questions 1 - 5 Conclusions from Public Consultation Process

The general response to the proposals was overwhelmingly positive with those supporting the proposals outnumbering those opposing them by a factor of 9 to 1. It is also clear that the level of support expressed is stronger in the Cranmore area than adjoining residential areas.

Upkeep - Legitimate concerns were raised that the introduction of new amenities would only be the beginning of a process.

These facilities will require an ongoing commitment by the local authority to high quality maintenance and repairs, which must also be funded.

Homes - Many residents were supportive of play areas more immediate to individual local green spaces, whilst others expressed concerns about attracting spaces for potentially noisy or antisocial behaviour closer to homes.

Many comments were recorded which were opposed to new housing of any description, and particularly social housing in the area.

Streets - There is a good deal of apprehension in the formation of new connections by those in the residential zones being opened up. The cul-de-sac nature of the areas is seen as a positive by many residents.

Community Facilities - There was a general sense that very high quality facilities already exist in the area. (to be completed) Outdoor Amenities - There was a high level of support for the focus of redevelopment on the current under utilized areas along the waterfront and the green aspect of the centre block site.

Socio Economic - There was strong support for the promotion and development of the riverfront for tourism related uses. This was seen as one possible route to jobs in the area. See Stage 3 separate report on Economic and Social Plan.

Key CM:

Cranmore

OTR:

Other

DP MS: Doorly Park / Martin Savage TP:

Tonaphubble

GV:

Garavogue Villas

Questionnaire Feedback : Breakdown by Areas Page 2 Questions 1 - 5 SUPPORT

Improving access to quality amenities and open spaces 1 Play Areas: Several sites are identified: Why? Residents identified absence of structured play space for all ages.

CM OTR 69 65

WOULD NOT SUPPORT

DPM S TP GV TOTAL 12 7 6 159

CM OTR 10 2

NO COMMENT

DPM S TP GV TOTAL 1 0 0 13

CM

DP OTR MS TP GV TOTAL 5 8 17 0 3 33

2 Easy Access to Regional Sports Centre and Cleveragh: Racecourse Cross

Route:

68

61

11

7

6

153

9

6

2

0

0

17

7

8 17

0

3

35

65

61

10

6

6

148

14

4

3

1

0

22

5

10 17

0

3

35

66

61

8

5

6

146

10

6

3

1

0

20

8

8 19

1

3

39

62

61

7

7

7

144

14

6

5

0

0

25

8

8 18

0

2

36

72

64

11

7

7

161

3

3

1

0

0

7

9

8 18

0

2

37

Gated access to new path to Sports Centre and Regional Park.

Why? Residents suggested a formal gate. The Plan proposes a safe and more direct pedestrian and cycle access to Sports Centre and pitches in Regional Park.

3 Create quality open spaces within Cranmore area a. linking Central Green space with Yeats Drive Mound with part of Carroll Drive extinguished: Why? Residents expressed need for new play spaces for all ages. New all weather pitch and outdoor play spaces (overlooked by a new Abbeyquarter building) will create a series of quality open spaces b reducing mound to John Fallon Drive/Joe Mc Donnell Drive, will provide quality passive open space Why? Residents expressed need for new play spaces for all ages. The mounds create a negative impression of the area 4 Exercise Trail: extend the existing Doorly Park trail through the Racecourse, New Avenue, Mercy Green and Chapel Hill.

Why? Makes a good exercise trail loop and brings new profile to Cranmore 5 River Front Jetty and Pavilion: At Doorly Park and at Boat House Quay, used by rowers.

Why? Encourages more people to enjoy the River and provides changing facilities for water sports.

Design Team analysis of comments (see chart below) : over 80 comments were made. For each page issues and nature of comments were assessed and charted. The following pages show the comments in full. In some places we had difficulty reading writing.

40

30

20

10

UPKEEP

HOMES

STREETS

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

OUTDOOR AMENITIES

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

Analysis of Written Comments : Page 2 of Questionnaire, Questions 1 - 5

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 93

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 1 - 5

Cranmore - Comments to page 2 of questionnaire Collery Play area for children.

1. Specifically like centre green for play area.

2. More Secure Lighting.

3 a. A bus Route would need to change (space to pull in safely off road).

3 b. Drop mound but secure fencing along Carroll Drive as far ??? At Devins Drive.

4. From bottom of Devins drive make ???? and space for bike trail to join with ????? trail.

5. Would like to see it used for locals and tourists.

Community gardens and allotment schemes should be included in the designs, like the idea of opening up the estate.

There is sufficient play area for children. New road to Joe McDonnell to Chapel Hill, we would be losing our neighbours.

I'm not in favour of building residential houses.

Fences around proposed mound reduction would be a good idea to combat the inevitable attempt to park caravans in the area which makes the estate look untidy, etc.

No bridge A playground at McNeil.

Re 2 Grand the way things are for walking 5. Check Dept of Water in good weather, wildlife, breeding and rush growth making boating difficult 3b. Reducing mound only.

1. near where parents can watch with seats to sit. If putting in trees make sure big ones not too near a house. Ensure green areas/trees are maintained.

2. Maybe not sure 3a. Keep current green park at heart of Community - Sustainable/eco friendly there.

4. not sure 5. not sure - Please be careful with this.

Ecological protection and Sustainability Principles must be central to any ???? Development. Absolute ban on any speed boating etc. Considered a non invasive river development in a measured way. Protection of flora and fauna.

Critical - no over development.

I would hope that the existing community centre building be extended for stage two ie ???? Building. the most needed thing at Doorly Park are secured toilets. A lot of people spend time there and lots of Summer Camps with no toilets, to me that would make more sense for hygiene.

Beauty of Lough Gill is in its undeveloped state. I would not support the building of pavillions by either local authority or the 'Grammar' which will detract from the area.

Maintain any play areas and keep clean. Any play or any recreation area that is created needs to be fit for purpose, maintained and if abused, monitored and closed up if needed.

4. To much smog at the moment from trucks and cars. With more traffic in future this might not be used?

I consider that quality open spaces are very important for peoples general well being, not so much because of their uses but because of the aesthetic and therapeutic value of nature.

Play area in Joe McDonnell It took 30 years to get a green area and the mounds should be left alone with nothing built on them and the resident didn't agree to the mounds been removed before and should be left alone.

3a. Get rid of mounds or level a bit at Yeats Drive. At the moment it's a hiding spot for anti-social behaviour.

3b. I think people living there would really like that.

Possible need for fences/hedging bordering mounds once reduced in order to deter unwanted caravans moving in.

Could do with more play areas for kids with BMX and skateboards.

Again, ???? Support: some of the play spaces should be dynamic paths then passive?? We really need somewhere for the 10 to 16 year olds to blow off steam. Skate board/rollerblade/bmx/cycling. Target wall for practicing football skills. Doorly Park is an excellent example of a bit of imagination. Something at the boat house would be a great addition to the area. A turbine at the weir at Riverside would help ofset the cost of lighting the area.

I feel that there are enough play areas. The most important thing is that they are maintained for children. The Abbeyquarter Community Centre is the focus point in Cranmore so it is vitally important that it stays in its current location. I feel that opening up new access points to Cranmore will create more social issues in the community.

1. Enough play areas identified. These need to be maintained.

3. Abbeyquarter community centre to stay in current area, as it has become the heart of Cranmore 4. Opening up new access points to Cranmore will create more issues.

Play areas are a great idea. It would be even better if an area was made for parents to sit down and watch the kids.

Picnic areas and benches would be a great idea for the open spaces.

Doorly Park / Martin Savage - Responses to page 2 of questionnaire

Open more trails in Doorly Park - these are marked but not accessible. Teenagers use these for drinking - opening these up to walkers would discourage this. Remove the old treatment works (opp No. 29 Doorly Park) (in the woods).

There are play areas that are not used.

What about the green areas in Martin Savage/Doorly Park?? It's a disgrace what is being done.

1 there is a park in Cranmore already and I rarely see anybody in it???

We have a nice play area in Doorly Park but the side where the children play is not covered in properly. There should be a wall on that side of the play area. I would not support the exercise trail through the racecourse from Doorly Park, New avenue mercy Green and Chapel Hill its impacting on property in our area Don't see why we need easier access to sports complex as its easy enough as it is.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 94

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 1 - 5

Other - Responses to page 2 of questionnaire Doorly Pk should have Lake Isle Boat Mooring

Currently Abbeyquarter manage Sean Fallon Pitch. Will this continue with the proposed moving of this pitch to Regional Park Need Training Centre and workshops More needs to be done with the river front Jetty to make it more accessible to everyone and for more water sports Re point no. 4 - Exercise Trail should be a complete (360) degree loop, have a bike hire, guided walker for economic development.

Re point no. 5 - Use this facility to drive economic development / local jobs Tea/Coffee shop for and or 5 Possible Room/Building near River for Sligo SAC search & Recovery Unit.

Bring back ?? Inishfree Boat further down Regional Sports Centre well established and fantastic resource to Sligo - would like to see improvements to this facility included in the plan within reason Excellent to 3- 4 - 5 - Is there a plan for a cycle way on new Sligo East City Link Bridge Reference to "Browns Field" on map but no listing on 1st plan.

Guide of walks/cycle - Cafe/Social structure for people to meet Reducing the mounds and encouraging more integrated social interaction and community responsibility in recreation space.

Great idea to open up the Area, that will give access to new developments at the River and Doorly Park Area.

Reduction of wasted areas in mounds into an amenity area very positive.

Incorporate teenage skate park for BMX bikes, and in-line roller blades and skateboarders. Jetty at the lodge area a good idea and economic driver.

Would not support access through the racecourse, as this is a facility with a separate purpose.

Developing the River front jetty is a good idea and unfortunately one neglected for years. A river cruise no longer operates from Doorly Park for this reason.

We need better co-operation with tourist ventures to make the most of natural resources.

Mounds and green areas most to be of the highest standard of design and finish - facilitate the amenities requirements Arranged walks and exercise events.

Re no: 5 - Site at Boat House Quay ideal for Water Sports Pavilion. more focus on the river as a place for sport leisure and start up water based business The development of the Jetty and pavilion will increase tourism footfall with disposable income - will allow an enhanced identity for the area --- can be used as a training /intern project for local youth - Income generation - tea house- Cafe -- training programmes in hospitality from Failte Ireland/Leo and will assist in transitioning to hospitals jobs in the city centre.

Subject to appropriate assessment 1, 3 and 5, I would be very supportive of. A Pitch and Putt golfing facility supervised would be very beneficial to introduce young and old to Golf. Maybe Strandhill or Rosses Point would advise or even sponsor.

These proposals will encourage and enhance the physical offering of recreational facilities. The rumoured ??????

Plans of the Racecourse Company to run concerts and exhibitions will require the provision of parking facilities for Coaches and Buses and this should be provided for in this plan. Such a Coach/Bus Parking facility would also facilitate sporting Activities/Competitions on the River Lake.

Play areas can lead to anti social behaviour as do a lot of public spaces - Cranmore already has a play area, one at Doorly Park.

Re point 2 and 4 - County Sligo Racecourse Suggests the use of the perimeter of their leased land for Pedestrian links in lieu of Direct links across the land. This suggestion was previously indicated during interviews with the regeneration team.

Tonaphuble - Responses to page 2 of questionnaire Activity Generation and organisation to “utilise” facilities is vital

Garavogue - Responses to page 2 of questionnaire Gaps for play areas in Garavogue - no bus Route for Garavogue Area.

Re no. 1 - Garavogue Villas kids used to play in Ray McSharry Park before it was developed and then they played in the Gaol, but they have all gone now, - there’s no space for the children to play.

Garavogue Villas - we don’t like the fence or the bushes. We would like to see it all taken away - and just put grass back. It’s an EYESORE. There’s no play area for children. They play on the widest part, could do with a fence to stop the balls.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 95

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire Questions 6 -10 Conclusions from Public Consultation Process The general response to these proposals was overwhelmingly positive. All of the historic assets within the Regeneration area are noted and should be retained and opened up for public use.

In some cases this is simple repair and restoration of fragments of derelict walls within a landscape setting. In other cases it represents identifying new viable uses for historical building and returning them to public use.

Key CM:

Cranmore

OTR:

Other

DP MS: Doorly Park / Martin Savage TP:

Tonaphubble

GV:

Garavogue Villas

Questionnaire Feedback : Breakdown by Areas Page 3 Questions 6 - 10 SUPPORT

Promoting historical assets in the area

CM

6 Brown's Field Developments: Conservation of remains of Carnsfort House: New mixed use sites with vehicle link from Cranmore Road to Racecourse View: Woodlands and walls of Carnsfoot House would be preserved Why? it is a hidden asset to be enjoyed, reflecting history of the area

OTR

WOULD NOT SUPPORT

DPM TP S

GV TOTAL

CM

NO COMMENT

DP MS TP GV TOTAL

OTR

CM

OTR

DPM S TP GV TOTAL

68

58

6

5

8

145

11

6

8

1

0

26

5

11

16

1

1

34

73

61

13

7

9

163

4

5

1

0

0

10

7

9

16

0

0

32

70

57

9

7

8

151

8

8

3

0

0

19

6

10

18

0

1

35

58

48

7

7

8

128

21

13

4

0

0

38

5

14

19

0

1

39

44

49

7

5

5

110

32

13

3

1

0

49

8

13

20

1

4

46

73

59

12

7

6

157

5

4

1

0

0

10

6

12

17

0

3

38

59

47

9

6

4

125

7

4

1

0

2

14

18

24

20

1

3

66

44

31

5

2

6

88

11

6

4

1

1

23

29

38

21

4

2

94

7 The Gaol: is a Conservation Asset and could become an Art/Visitor

Centre.

Why? it is a hidden asset and potentially a visitor destination attraction

Providing quality spaces for community facilities 8 Create quality open spaces within Cranmore area Medical Facility: suggested location is Central Cleared Site in Cranmore Why? Much needed facility identified by residents as a priority to could serve Sligo East City. Devins Drive location would give it a good profile and is walkable for residents.

9 a. New Abbey Quarter Centre: Replacement proposed on Central Cleared site. Upgrade of existing Abbey Quarter centre would require extensive work, disrupt the use of the Centre and would be a short term fix Why? Residents identified need for new spaces for meetings, clubs, training, and family support. Proposal illustrates combining those uses with quality outdoor spaces so all can be managed as one facility. b. Re-­‐Use of existing Abbey Quarter Centre Site: If new facility is built, site could be liberated for new housing.

Why? Residents emphasise the existing Centre is outdated, lacks a lift and access to appropriate outdoor spaces and parking is inadequate. Sale of site helps fund new Centre and delivers more diverse housing mix.

10 a. Lodge Building at Doorly Park: Public owned building could be used as community/information centre/cafe.

Why? It is on the river front trail at a good stopping point; could complement a pleasure boat jetty. Meeting Space also identified by local community as a need. Awaits a viable use, needs to be pursued with a management group to lead its development 10 b. Garavogue Villas Community Meeting Room Space: Potential for shared use of the Lodge? or a converted house within Garavogue?

Why? Identified by local community as a need.

.

Design Team analysis of comments (see chart below) : over 103 comments were made. For each page issues and nature of comments were assessed and charted. The following pages show the comments in full. In some places we had difficulty reading writing.

40

30

20

10

UPKEEP

HOMES

STREETS

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

OUTDOOR AMENITIES

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

Analysis of Written Comments : Page 3 of Questionnaire, Questions 6 - 10

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 96

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 6 - 10

Cranmore - Comments to page 3 of questionnaire Use the Abbeyquarter centre and turn it into a training facility Turn the Abbeyquarter centre into a training facility Information spot for Doorly Park Lodge Use Abbeyquarter as a training centre with workshops Information place for Doorly Park 6. Dedicated space for supervised quad bike use.

7. As a tourist centre - Would love to see it re-opened.

8. GP would need an incentive to come.

9a. Focus would need to change.

9b. Need more lighting on Geldof Drive.

10. Would need 2 houses ?????

9b. Would not like to see social housing built on Geldof Drive.

9a. The new facility is not specific for Abbeyquarter Centre, must include other Community Group e.g. Co-op etc.

Only reason I bought this house is because of there being no houses facing or to the side of it. Proposals would diminish my house price, ruin my view, create more noise pollution and possible irritants (kids etc) to my disabled daughter.

No lorries through Brown's Field. Jo comment on 10 a and b as not in the area.

9a Not in proposed site. Do not remove Yeats Drive mound or John Fallon. These are part of Cranmore. 9b. Training Centre Sport area (indoor) in old Abbeyquarter don't remove Cranmore Mounds John Fallon and Yeats Drive 9(a) Would not like resource house to move.

6. Protect, keep 7. it could be good.

9b. Keep as is and develop/extend 10a. ok for canoes etc. Not for speed boating, no way 10b. Up to Garavogue residents.

9a. Nore sure what to say.

I would like to see a BIG monitor (screen) with all news, events, what's going on, to be erected within the estate. Some people have no access to information, (can't buy papers, no internet etc) No new houses on Geldof Drive! Will ruin my view, promote anti-social behaviour, congest the area, make traffic and noise pollution a problem. Will you buy me a new house in a quiet area close to all amenities, 4 beds????

After knocking down houses we don't want any more houses built.

Abbeyquarter is an eye sore, it looks like an RUC station, very bad reflection on the community.

6. Make a proper walkway through it.

9b see comment on 1st page Will not support further building of houses and vehemently oppose the building of apartments in area. Geldof drive is quiet and peaceful and the residents would like to keep it as is or be rehoused!

9 Moving Abbeyquarter centre including the soccer pitch is not a viable option as it only is short term fix, should be more pitches, training facilities for kids along with existing site.

Keep the woodlands. The house is a pile of rubbish. Knock it and put in a plaque. I cannot support a new centre while the threat of more houses after the cost of it. There must be no more houses.

Buy my house back if road to go through Geldof Drive. I want to keep it peaceful in Geldof Drive. NO MORE HOUSES!!

Abbeyquarter Community Centre to stay in its current spot as it has become the heart of Cranmore The Abbeyquarter Community Centre is the focus point in Cranmore so it is vitally important that it stays in its current location. I feel that houses built on the Abbeyquarter Centre Site will result in the area getting very built up and road into the estate should be made wider to cope with the increase in the flow of traffic.

9a Abbeyqurter Community Centre to stay in current area as it has become the heart of Cranmore.

9b Area too built up. Access point into Geldof drive too narrow. Road should be made wider.

Cannot understand why you would knock down Abbeyquarter Centre to build a new one as it is fine as it stands. More money would be wasted by doing this.

Doorly Park / Martin Savage - Responses to page 3 of questionnaire A jetty so close to the proposed new bridge doesn't seem like a great idea. Would parking be a problem?

I think it's important to choose the trees carefully and not just "plant a few" of the same type along the avenue.

9(a) Cranmore has enough houses . Use Abbeyquarter for workshops.

6 Brown's field will turn into a drinking area, antisocial behaviour etc. Enough - leave alone.

6. I would not support Brown's Field developments it was a lovely house one time and like everything else knocked down, why?

10. The only heritage in our area leave it as a community centre. If a house is being converted in other areas why not DPMSRA get a house converted for our use as a community centre.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 97

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 6 - 10

Other - Responses to page 3 of questionnaire Who would manage the new proposed ideas for the lodge?

Community /or Council/ Privately run Important that new housing is to enable current residents to downsize 9(a) why does the centre need to be replaced, nice idea but seems a waste of money. no. 6 & 7 to be part of guided tours/walks turn no. 10 in to a coffee shop to compliment 4/5/6/7 Space for slip sac boats etc ?

Would new centre be built before old one knocked To use Abbey Quarter as a training facility What happens to Services that are based in the Abbeyquarter when Centre is being upgraded?

Would like to see AQ re developed Use Abbey Quarter and turn it into training facility.

Re: Q 6 There was an orchard there too. Bring back apples - lovely Cider Apples Re: 10 a - Redevelop what is there - would make a lovely coffee shop Definitely a need for more tourist attractions/ amenities etc.

The River area has huge potential

Up to Garavogue Residents RE no. 7 would that mean that the old machinery garage would be knocked down ? Re no. 6 might be an area where a civil defence centre could be included.

Re no. 6 Really excellent plan Re 9 b - Youth Cafe perhaps see below.

Re. 10 (a) Excellent Idea "Francaise esquires" ??

Re 9(b) youth Cafe, artists space, young excellent - this could be funded.

Re 7: Keep integrity of site : Re 6 keep walled garden â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Re 9 multi use centres donâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t work - Divergent interests ???????

Hard to manage The fishing and boating tradition of this area is an integral part of Sligo Town like past and present and could be promoted as a centre to pass on skills rotating to river life past and present.

Re no. 10 - Could equally be a private venture with Community involvement, the building could be decorated with photos and info on the history of the area with opportunities as a "Gateway" to the amenities offered by Doorly Park, Cleveragh and the Lake - hire of bicycles etc, boat trips, walking - great tourist potential.

Again the upgrade of Lodge and old Gaol building will create an opportunity to get together and not feel left out.

Medical Centre location in the area would stop more social housing being built on the site.

Lodge best as commercial opportunity I support conservation of Carnsfort House but do not see the need for vehicle link between Cranmore Rd to Racecourse view. Lodge Building would need to be a new purpose for the other is either a tourist facility or a community facility.

As a community facility it may overlap with other available centres in the regeneration plan.

RE 10 (a) - Nature info - The Gaol is a hidden gem that should be opened to public.

Think the lodge would double up as a community centre for both Doorly Park/Martin Savage and Garavogue Residents and be a information centre by day Re no. 7 Tourism linked to guided walks.

Re no. 10 (a) Tea House.

Re promoting historical assets in the area- use of place names ?

For new roads, housing etc., Re no. 7 - Sligo Gaol - treatment as an Art/Visitor Centre is very narrow, may exclude other opportunities.

10. (a) Good to see lodge being prioritised for appropriate use.

10.(b) Difficult to see use as community - What about a business Focus ?

Add - Megalithic Site at Garavogue Villas - present and interpret.

Re no. 9(a) Yes I think this is positive.

Any land suitable for one off houses should be developed and offered at reasonable cost to people who would construct their own homes as was done on Circular and Cleveragh Roads.

The overall areas is family compact and the emphasis should be on "shared facilities" rather than each section aspiring to having their own facilities" there is no reason why each group cannot have their own "Room" within a shared facility.

Re no. 8 - not a di??tabic?? Clinic/Risk of Break-ins.

Re Lodge - Information.

No more housing like Cranmore needed, elderly or units for disabled welcome.

What is present membership of clubs by Cranmore residents?

How many are involved in GAA Clubs, soccer clubs etx, How may go to training for supports at present.

Tonaphuble - Responses to page 3 of questionnaire

Re: no 7 The Gaol - Could be part of a tour from historical buildings, The courthouse to good, Many historical goods have been refurbished and attract great numbers of tourists, Definitely a hidden asset.

Community ownership through Co-ops would enable all community benefit from business and employment opportunities. Eg. Urban Farm, Plant Nurseries, Co-op Cafe, Launderette etc.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 98

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 6 - 10

Garavogue - Responses to page 3 of questionnaire Garavogue Jail,

Statues on the round about to be maintained.

Re Gaol: I am surprised something wasnâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t done years ago - they took so much out of it - the beds- all that was taken away - that was a shame.

I'd like to see things on in the evening.

Re no. 10 - Would prefer a house to be converted within Garavogue as we feel there is a need for such a place in our community e.g. Satalite doctor, resident and meeting place for elderly and young people alike.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 99

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire Questions 11 - 14

Conclusions from Public Consultation Process

Key

There is a high level of support for these proposed improvements. Many people have recommended that the team should consider ways to slow down or reduce traffic on these routes. With the elimination of a number of cul de sacs there was general agreement to install traffic lights at some junctions on Devins Drive. There was also support for improvements to end gable houses facing onto Devins Drive and Cranmore Road. Consideration should be given to the introduction of coordinated and integrated soft landscape proposal on Devins Drive, Cranmore Road and the cemetery carpark.

CM:

Cranmore

OTR:

Other

DP MS: Doorly Park / Martin Savage TP:

Tonaphubble

GV:

Garavogue Villas

Questionnaire Feedback : Breakdown by Areas Page 4 Questions 11 - 14 Improving quality of the roads, streets and urban spaces 11 St Anne's Place Landscape: new tree planting here and along Cranmore Road.

Why? To make this place and link to the East City Area more attractive, without losing much parking.

12 Devins Drive Improvements: landscaped as an Avenue and new traffic light controlled crossing.

Why? Residents suggested tree planting to reduce bleakness of street and asked for safer and easier crossing points.

13 Cranmore Road Improvements: ESB Frontage Enhanced: new planting and pavement treatment.

Why? Residents wanted pavement to be wider and more attractive to use.

SUPPORT DP CM OTR MS TP GV

TOTAL

WOULD NOT SUPPORT DP CM OTR MS TP GV TOTAL

NO COMMENT DP CM OTR MS TP GV TOTAL

78

64

12

7

6

167

3

1

1

0 3

8

3 10

17

0

0

30

72

59

9

7

5

152

8

5

1

0 0

14

4 11

20

0

4

39

73

60

11

7

8

159

8

5

3

0 0

16

3 10

16

0

1

30

79

61

12

7

6

165

1

3

1

0 3

8

4 11

17

0

0

32

Ray McSharry Park Boundary Wall: replace with railings and widen pavement.

Why? Residents requested a better safer footpath. This is a hidden open space so railings would make walking past pleasurable rather than alienating.

14 Cemetery Car Park: access off lay-­‐by to small car park on existing pitch area, cemetery expansion is possible as well.

Why? Mourners parking causes traffic congestion and parking on busy road for funerals is undignified.

Design Team analysis of comments (see chart below) : over 58 comments were made. For each page issues and nature of comments were assessed and charted. The following pages show the comments in full. In some places we had difficulty reading writing.

40

30

20

10

UPKEEP

HOMES

STREETS

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

OUTDOOR AMENITIES

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

Analysis of Written Comments : Page 4 of Questionnaire, Questions 11 - 14

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 100

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 11 - 14

Cranmore - Comments to page 4 of questionnaire What will happen when Cemetery is full (10 years) Footpath needs to be upgraded (?????????????????? a piece of new and old).

11. Would need to be very ???? And make safe from vandals.

12. Railing along street, footpath along edge round.

13.Small wall with railings. Text Strongly support cenetary improvements and widening of paths. Also suggest more litter bins for dog dirt on main roads and Doorly walk.

More lights on Cranmore Road 13. Parking at exchange. 14. What happens when cemetery is full.

Ray McSharry park needs to be used more More bicycle lanes are needed.

Cemetary car park a good idea.

Cemetary road very narrow isn't it.

Would support parking on Cemetery Road.

Doorly Park / Martin Savage - Responses to page 4 of questionnaire I think it's important to choose the trees carefully and not just "plant a few" of the same type along the avenue.

14 Very good idea.

11 I think we have enough trees in our area.

14 Would support a car park on Cleveragh side If McSharry Park had railings people would stand on pavement and watch matches and therefore not pay to get in.

Other - Responses to page 4 of questionnaire More parking around Government Building/Widen Road between Cranmore and St. Anneâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Brilliant Ideas Not adequate parking at Cemetery for large funerals Re: Q.13 Great idea - especially- because junction very icy in winter. Re Q. 14 Leave as cemetery. Use the race course parking Cemetery parking improvement badly needed.

Re no. 13 - Ray Mac Sharry Park Providing all items are discussed and agreed with the governing body prior to any work commencing and that all costs are met by local Government. town.

Bus Shelters - idea for local transport to use the Tele ????

Demand responsive service - Access by "pin code" to Local Disc parking centre See "Local ??????? See smarter travel Re no. 13 - Ray Mac Sharry Park Providing all items are discussed and agreed with the governing body prior to any work commencing and that all costs are met by local Government.

Landscaping and signage and lighting ???

Can CCTV system be extended to cover cemetery and ass ?? Car park.

If the people who live there are happy with changes, I support.

As the cemetery is central to all our lives, some sort of rethinking should be exercised to accommodate mourner parking and access at a time of great distress.

General Area needs to be refreshed, but not overly fenced.

Incorporate cycle lanes in any road re alignment.

I do not support a car park for the cemetery as this will not fully solve parking issues for funerals. Mourners and those attending funerals need to be mindful that parking a distance away and walking to the cemetery is commonplace in many areas. investigation required. Re no's 12-- 13 - Provision should also be made for cyclists along these routes.

Re no 14: Think the car park is a no - brainer - if when the new bridge goes ahead, cemetery road will be a lot busier. of Sligo as a whole.

Re point 12? Recently erected barrier at Pedestrian crossing ludicrous!

Any planting that would soften landscape would be welcome. Re point 14 - I always thought this area was to be used as extension to Cemetery but I agree parking would be desirable.

Liberal Tree planting throughout the whole area, coupled with beds of perennial colourful shrubs will make a major impact in softening the various streetscapes. The provision of berry bearing shrubs and trees will attract birds and wild life. Planting thorn bearing shrubs will reduce vandalism.

Re no. 13: and Ray McSharry Park Boundary Wall. Ridiculous waste of money. Only putting in Roads - to sell Road frontage - sell houses to pay for Road and regeneration project to detriment of Doorly Park area. Danger of more Council houses like Cranmore area.

Fully agree with softening the land and harsh landscape.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 101

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 11 - 14 Tonaphuble - Responses to page 4 of questionnaire The current arrangement often causes congestion and delays, particulary at Dunnes Stores Round about.

The pedestrian crossings at Dunnes Stores are badly located and are dangerous.

Too many speed ramps and are too big in places.

I presume a new entrance to cemetary will be created on Cleveragh Rd and the old one on Cemetary road would be closed?

Garavogue - Responses to page 4 of questionnaire Foothpaths in Garavogue are a nuisance - people drive on path to avoid the RAMPS - they are dangerous Re no. 11 - Deliveries for Dunnes and Aldi - they have to reverse into them.

Parking is badly needed while attending funerals Deliveries for Aldi and Dunnes create a nusiance.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 102

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire Questions 15 - 20

Conclusions from Public Consultation Process and reduce road safety for the very young and old.

Key CM:

Cranmore

OTR:

Other

DP MS: Doorly Park / Martin Savage

The links themselves need to be very attractive and secure. It is suggested by some within the community that lighting and security cameras should be well located to eliminate anti social behaviour. The links need to be well located to provide access to schools, health care facilities, shops and places of work.

TP:

Tonaphubble

GV:

Garavogue Villas

Questionnaire Feedback : Breakdown by Areas Page 5 Questions 15 - 20

Design Team analysis of comments (see chart below) : over 73 comments were made. For each page issues and nature of comments were assessed and charted. The following pages show the comments in full. In some places

40

30

20

10

Analysis of Written Comments : Page 5 of Questionnaire, Questions 15 - 20

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 103

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 15 - 20

Cranmore - Comments to page 5 of questionnaire Restriction signs on Devins Drive - no lorries

17. Keep a space for safe use of quad bikes.

18. Concerns re an extra road as it might be used as a rat run.

Don't want four houses demolished. I suggest removing the Mercy wall behind the four houses and open up the alley and use some of the Mercy land. We cannot afford to lose good neighbours.

Link road to meet up with Langan Drive No housing on road access through Geldof Drive Well lit walkway so people can feel safe.

16. What about motor bikes coming through this.

17. Will bus route go through here to hospital.

20. up to Garavogue residents.

No comments 15. I'd support it, but i'm not from Geldof Drive. Make sure there are good footpaths and cycle paths on any new road.

Badly needed Already use the Aldi link et gto get to Garavogue Villas but not open all the time, If new road goes through Geldof Drive many residents will want to be rehoused/bought out. The reason for many choosing to buy homes on this road is because of the view, the fact its a cul de sac with no houses facing, is a quiet area with no antisocial activity. Plans would completely destroy this.

Will never support making my street a main road. I purchased this house because the area is a cul-de-sac, with no houses to the side or fronts, football pitch and tennis courts, nice view, close to everything without the hassles. It will be destroyed if plans go ahead.

No need to knock houses just knock the alley wall down between alley and school. strong community by removing the 4 houses.

15 & 16 I am living in Joe McDonnell Drive for the past 18 years. We have 3 children and have not had any issues with the alley way at McDonnell Drive. I would not like a road or a park on my door step.

Could do putting more bins in the Garavogue area, badly needed.

Don't agree with through road in Geldof Drive. If you want this to go ahead but me out and i'll move. would have a negative impact on what should is a safe area for pedestrians.

16. Road link from McDonnell Drive. I support the idea fully provided it goes ahead as stated above cycle/foorpath access, not vehicle access. I would not like a safe area opened up to cars driving through.

We are totally in favour of the Regeneration of the Cranmore and surrounding areas. But to uproot 4 families who have lived there for the last 30 years is unacceptable. I suggest that the powers that be may sit around the table and come up with an alternative route to the Mercy lands.

I don't agree of demolishing of 4 houses from Joe McDonnell Drive to Chapel Hill. The existing Alley should be

could result in more accidents.

15 Increased vehicle access through a small housing estate would not make sense Would not support any link roads. Our street should never become a main road.

Doorly Park / Martin Savage - Responses to page 5 of questionnaire 16, 17, 18: NO, NO, No There are enough roads in existence - it would take one minute to use the existing road!!!

Suggestion 17 is ridiculous. We will have a busy road to the front of our homes and then an extra one across from us too! Surely people from Cranmore could use the other routes, there is not a huge difference distance wise! Better If I had a truck I wouldn't even try to drive through Garavogue as its too narrow.

15 Could not support any of these.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 104

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 15 - 20 Other - Responses to page 5 of questionnaire New Links are a very good idea. An estate the size of Cranmore needs better access to main roads.

The Mercy order would obviously have to be accommodated in their needs.

Re: Q 16 Put more lighting and widen on the mercy side.

Proposed links show how close Masterplan area is to centre of sligo and to accessing Major Road network - improves "connectivity" of Masterplan area.

Re no. 19 Not if Road goes Down by Boundary fencing of Ray Mac Sharry Park.

Others to be left to residents of both areas

Access and linkage - invite more people in Re no. 17 - Priority should be given to the bridges. Professional people involved need to get set together.

Some other arrangements could be made with the school for out of school activities such as an art and culture etc.

This may be a way to build better relationships between IT Sligo and the community to encourage educational atta???? And building social capital. Opening up the Gaol as an attraction would also launch the culture and history of the River.

vehicles in residential areas.

Re no; 19 - Yes its existing/ closer potential for development.

Re no. 20 Trucks how will you deal with them in these residential areas?

Re 15 - 20: All Above: Provision should be made for cyclists on all existing and new proposed access routes.

Re 17 - new Road link not to impact on walled garden of Carnsfort Re 15 - I positively agree with extension of Geldof drive and enhancement of same connecting with Pilkington Terrace. would have to study suggestion.

Re no. 16 - How many in Cranmore use Bikes???

Underlined bits of no. 17 --------------------------A busier through Road from Cranmore to IT etc ruins Doorly Park people losing their gardens to facilitate Road - Just to Bridge and leave Roads as they are How many in Cranmore go Re no 15 - you should look at removing and replacing the long boundary wall of the Mercy College on Chapel Hill with Railings as the wall is long and ugly.

Re no. 17 - 18 - County Racecourse suggest that any proposed connections utilise the perimeter of their leased land and do not create direct links across the Racecourse.

Tonaphuble - Responses to page 5 of questionnaire Church and Sligo School Project when responding to calls.

future.

Garavogue - Responses to page 5 of questionnaire Re no. 20 - Garavogue is too narrow for trucks or buses to come down - only small buses can come through.

to become a short cut.

I don't agree with it, what about the children.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 105

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire Questions 21 - 25

Conclusions from Public Consultation Process There is considerable support for the redevelopment of these public assets however there is also concern expressed that the proposed uses should be appropriate and not impact on the residential amenity of the surrounding houses. The uses should be needs community and private houses. Job creation facilities was also very high on their agenda.

Key CM:

Cranmore

OTR:

Other

DP MS: Doorly Park / Martin Savage TP:

Tonaphubble

GV:

Garavogue Villas

Questionnaire Feedback : Breakdown by Areas Page 6 Questions 21 - 25

Design Team analysis of comments (see chart below) : over 68 comments were made. For each page issues and nature of comments were assessed and charted. The following pages show the comments in full. In some places

40

30

20

10

Analysis of Written Comments : Page 6 of Questionnaire, Questions 21 - 25

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 106

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 21 - 25

Cranmore - Comments to page 6 of questionnaire Longford example. 22. Accessible housing, not in favour of apartments similar to Cheshire. 23. No HGV's. 24. Use as a play area.

21. Private Housing only. 22. Apartments did not work before. 24. Need to consult with those who live in the area. 25.

It is a new community facility, make clear it's not just Abbeyquarter Centre.

No more houses need to be built in this area!

No house in Centre Block Skate board park/motor cross track 25 Residential should not be more than single story houses Make accommodation affordable for people. Decrease housing list, supply social housing. Housing should be a 22. Keep as park, strongly opposed to this.

25. This site for leisure use only. Childrens games etc. Seats.

Re no. 24: - a medi centre for all of eastern area. i live in Cranmore Drive in a 4 bedroomed house over an alley and I agree with the plan on letting the tenants buy the vacant green area to the back of the four houses and closing the alley as since we moved in in 1991 have been nothing but trouble No 22. Where is Abbeyquarter Men's Group to be moved?

(22) (24) Allow more for people with disabilities? wheelchairs etc. Not too many apartments. We don't want our environment going backwards and to be called cranmore (in).

24. Not really affecting me. Refurbish all houses nice houses (not apartments) 25 Houses for elerdy or disabled only 22 Accessible housing, not many children in Cranmore Place: not suitable for family accommodation.

23 All in favour of any play areas. Lacking in the area at the moment.

Support centre block site proposal but not for residential use. Wasted alot of money rehousing and knocking down previous houses in order to de-congest. Building more homes would be a step backwards.

No more housing needed.

Where is Abbeyquarter Menâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Group being moved to.

Keep building and we will be back 35 years again with no green area.

21. But don't knock houses. No more housing in and around Cranmore The centre block area needs to be equipped with sports equipment and an all weather pitch - stuff for all ages. Add a walk-way and benches for elderly people to go and sit and watch the grandkids.

The Sligo Borough/County Council's Housing policy area the years have been abonimal to say the least. No logic seems to have been used in their application. They put vulnerable people into poorly thought out housing and then abandoned them to their fate. No situation should be allowed to happen like that again. If people need more power to do this then it should be given.

21 Don't need any more play areas. Plenty open spaces for play area, a nice quiet area would be preferred.

Would agree with existing areas to be used for medical facilities and play areas. A good idea in Geldof Drive would be alotments for planting greens and veg. Would be great for people with no garden space. A charge would be paid yearly for people who would like to use it.

Doorly Park / Martin Savage - Responses to page 6 of questionnaire Smaller little development eg 1 bedroom.

24. Low density, for older people and for people with disability. Supported housing 22 I thought the idea of regeneration for Cranmore was to reduce the number of houses/people in one area?

24 You will be taking away our other green area so leave this empty and take down the fences around it.

Danger of pitch close to either road.

Would not like to see houses built on masionette site Sorry, I cannot support any of these suggestions. The former maisonette site needs consultation with all the residents of our area and let us decide.

An allotment for the residents in Martin Savage and Doorly Park would be nice to see in the old Maisonette site.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 107

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 21 - 25 Other - Responses to page 6 of questionnaire No apartments proposed for each site and type of housing (social/private) Q.25 - Central block - community & medical Type of community centre - explain - huge need for training centre/ community employment & enterprise.

How many houses in total Maisonettes site should be used for Residential.

Re question no. 22 - only if Accommodation is of mixed use i.e. Social/Private & Affordable.

Re question no. 24 - how many houses would be built on it.

Make provision for Allotments for people to grown their own Veg and Flowers Re. Q. 22 prefer to see houses- more family orientation - more community in houses.

Re: Q 25 Detail of storage shed for maintenance equipment -where will this site be. Long term maintenance plan for new green areas and budget for this.

Re: 21 Os more new housing needed?

Re: Q. 22 Is apartments the most practical form of housing? Space + accessibility /practicality as people get older.

For Residents in the area to decide.

Need for new centre a focal point - develop create joined up walking routes with maps Re no: 22 Or possible mixed uses: Residential, Social Commercial uses, very good opportunities to have "feature" building at entrance to Devins Drive at Cranmore.

It is very important that Cranmore Community have a central hub, where the community can gather and pursue Re no. 23 - If Residents Agree Browns Field Centre Block Site both have the potential to be developed as a community gardens/apartments to create an opportunity for training in horticulture and leisure gardening and small scale food production for all ages. to town centre JFK Parade should be changed to allow access to Bridge St. For resident of this area. This could be achieved quickly.

Re 24 - should include wider Boulevard style connection to Doorly Park from Cranmore to visually a physically link residential to green space.

Re 21 - 24 Development (Residential) as outlined at 9 - 25 sounds progressive but when mounds levelled some planting of trees would be desirable to soften. If 1 % scheme is still in operation, should be accessed to provide outstanding durable art work in focal point.

I suggest that all residential developments (22, 24, 25) be low to medium density as overall, the area has suffered from its high density and lack of adequate facilities and from general environment.

area for different physio yoga therapies. place to read newspapers, play bingo, cards, bowls etc, teach basic IT/ healthy cooking etc etc.

Re no 23 - The area of land marked as "under used court" and a portion of the area of trees marked as "Wooded copse" on the masterplan are areas of land being leased by County Sligo Racecourse.

County Sligo Racecourse intend to use this portion of land to extend the width of their racetrack and insist that any proposed masterplan developments in this area do not interfere with this leased land.

Tonaphuble - Responses to page 6 of questionnaire Browns Field may be a route via edge of Racecourse and some demolished houses to Pearse Rd. Creating Community Gardens encourages activity to off put possible/Antisocial Behaviour.

Consider a development of independent/monitored apartmetns building for retired people.

Garavogue - Responses to page 6 of questionnaire No Comments

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 108

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire Questions 26 - 31 Conclusions from Public Consultation Process Public Consultation feedback demonstrated strong support for all projects. There was little written commentary regarding the more remote projects, being perhaps indicative of their lack of immediate impact on residents.

There was a generally supportive sentiment to the redevelopment of the site adjacent to Globe House and the rezoning of the Cleveragh Drive sites. There was broad support for a mixture of ideas including environmental proposals and outdoor community uses on the Racecourse central site.

Key CM:

Cranmore

OTR:

Other

DP MS: Doorly Park / Martin Savage social behaviour. Many however felt that it would be important to maintain a connection between Collery Drive and Cranmore.

It was also suggested that lower impact solutions such as the erection of barriers and fences could eliminate the existing problems.

In relation to the proposed upgrades to the housing and hard and soft landscaping in the study area there was again strong support. The environmental upgrades were almost universally supported, with the only commentary seeking more detail and a hope that the works could provide local employment. Browns Field was seen as offering considerable potential for both residential, retail and commercial development.

The key concern with regard to the housing upgrades was one of fairness. It was strongly noted in many responses that there

TP:

Tonaphubble

GV:

Garavogue Villas

mechanisms should be sought through the masterplan to assist both public and private residents of Cranmore and indeed of immediate surrounding areas.

Questionnaire Feedback : Breakdown by Areas Page 7 Questions 26 - 31

Design Team analysis of comments (see chart below) : over 66 comments were made. For each page issues and nature of comments were assessed and charted. The following pages show the comments in full. In some places

40

30

20

10

Analysis of Written Comments : Page 7 of Questionnaire, Questions 26 - 31

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 109

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 26 - 31

Cranmore - Comments to page 7 of questionnaire Build bigger houses for large families. Need more 5/6 bedroomed houses in Cranmore. Build more 2 bed houses.

Collery Drive. Insulation of existing homes to keep draughts out. Windows sealed properly.

27 With Sustainable energy, low density (link to local development). 29. Just knock 3 bungalows nearest Collery, Put up wall and build 2 houses with own entrance. 30. Want to know about old entrance plaster being taken off before re-????? With new. Concerns re chimney. 31. Issues re what people do with waste, still dumping.

Can the alley not be closed on Collery Drive without the pointless exercise of knocking down 6 homes and rebuilding elsewhere causing maximum disturbance.

I'm a resident of Collery Drive bungalows: everyone is harrassed. It can be lovely during the day when kids are at school but at night, itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a problem for the old people. I am concerned about the time-frame. How long will this take and what will happen in the meantime? What if this would be the last project to be done, how will we cope in the meantime? Can they put up temporary security in the meantime? We need privacy and security. What will we do with our houses in the meantime? I've done lots of improvements to my home.

No more one bedroom houses. Do not suit people. Back boiler in all houses/no storage heating. More housing for people with disabilities.

Are housing improvements available to private tenants 31. Could be interesting Like sustainable energy - please develop this. No more houses in Cranmore. Social initiatives could be further developed. Keep central site green!

Collery Drive ????

Sheltered housing for the elderly and Special needs.

The whole area of sustainable energy is a huge challenge for all of us for the future. What happens when the oil runs out?

29. Why take away existing housing and build more..... Just build a wall instead.

No 28 this sounds like a scheme that may run out of money half way through leaving a half developed site facility.

29. I am a resident of Yeats Drive, I fully support this a a we have no priority I see no 29 as a waste of time and money and creating pointless hassle for current residents. Can the alley not be closed without knocking down homes?

Just close alleyway in Collery Drive. Don't make it such a nightmare! Needless hassle None Any upgrades /improvements to housing should be aviable to private homeowners also. These are the people who have made their lives in Cranmore and have bought their homes. Any Schemes should include everyone, it would be descrimination to exclude private households.

Housing improvements made available to all households owned and rented in the interests of fairness for all families animosity among residents.

Any upgrades to housing stock should include private households, something like a 50/50 scheme as happened in St. in Local Authority accommodation. Homeowners have invested in their homes and are committed to living in them long term.

There are lots of space around Sligo begging for development for public housing without imposing more on the Cranmore area. Any more building done on this area should only be for the enhancement of the place and not to squeeze more people in.

More bungalows need to be developed in the estate for the older generation in years to come. An option should be available for them to trade their current house for a bungalow if they have reduced mobility. There is some green areas in the estate that should be developed to encourage people to get involved in sports such as tennis and basketball courts.

In any green areas that are proposed as residental sites bungalows should be developed for the older generation of Cranmore. A scheme could be developed where the current 2 storey house is traded for a bungalow which should cater for the needs of senior citizens.

In some green areas tennis courts should be developed. Shortfall in Sligo town for tennis courts.

Many people have their houses bought so nothing will be done for them but anyone in a Council house will get everything for nothing.

Doorly Park / Martin Savage - Responses to page 7 of questionnaire 30 Houses along new bridge route should be grant aided to triple glaze windows to reduce noise levels and impacts Would like the opportunity to be included in any group scheme for insulation etc 27 No more houses 30 Hilarious: why just for Cranmore if the regeneration is for the entire area?!

27 As per my comments on point 22 - No more houses please.

Cranmore!!!

I can't support energy farm plans for Racecourse. All this concerns should be explained.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 110

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

QUESTIONS 26 - 31 Other - Responses to page 7 of questionnaire Re: question 29 - only if amenities is preserved and not ????? Fettered ??

Depending on the residents view re: quest. 29 - Collery Drive Depending on the residents view re: quest. 29 - Collery Drive Re: Q 28 put in a pond in the centre of the race - course, with wind turbines to heat the water, e.g. Surrey quags nr.

Re: Q 29 - would be good to eliminate Alley - I assume there is not other way without disaccomoding 6 families.

Re no. 27 It would take the place and quiteness from it

- For Residential views.

built environment through community Arts - Intervention - as part of civic engagement and cultural democracy????

Re no. 28 Totally underutilised. Potential for family venue with activity eg. Crazy golf/cycling circuit. Re no. 30 Above and opportunities for training and employment and improve quality of life for residents and green friendly.

Structural Housing - special needs housing valuable, safe surfaces/footpath/ security Re no. 28 unsure if heat pump theraphy works in sligo area Overall plan re access to Alley ways needs careful consideration Given the high density of the area, distinct heating would be the obvious, most sustainable, economical and environmentally friendly option. Heat ay possibly be provided by a number of sources, and the use of green and food and "West Mound". Considered the proposed end use of these areas, a ground investigation (dvc diligence) should be performed, followed, if necessary, by risk - assessment and remediation.

The more sustainable energy the better.

Could the ground source heat pumps work hand in hand with Community Garden and Food source?

Re 27 - residential site in this area should be sold at reasonable cost to suitable tenants of Council/Local Authority.

Re 28 - But no wind mills. Re 29-31 Sounds good but who would oversee and implement.

New limits to be completed before families are disrupted by removal of old houses. I suggest you look at all new builds be it semi-dethatched and half brick fronted. The application of insulation to the outside of housing stocks can be Individual heat exchanger (air) vents can also improve heating and reduce costs once initial costs are covered.

Re point no. 27 (jobs) - Also maybe a centre teaching citizenship for residents in Regeneration area - how to work and pay your way - for leisure facilities etc. Also time for leisure and more work. All estates in town especially where people pay tax should all have these facilities - not all ploughed into one corner of Sligo. Rewarding wrong area, who are getting Free everything already.

Would like to explore Collery Drive proposal further.

Re no: 28 - The central site in the Racecourse exists as a wetlands area and a wetlands habitat is proposed.

Tonaphuble - Responses to page 7 of questionnaire Cleveragh Drive re zoning - should be kept Industrial - re no. 29 unsure.

Re no. 27 - must be held as park land Grown Biomass in Area. Harvesting this creates employment.

Garavogue - Responses to page 7 of questionnaire Regarding Housing improvement and heating and energy: a lot of houses in Garavogue are below standard and are in need of such schemes. have it.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 111

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire over 130 comments were made Cranmore - Comments to page 8 of questionnaire Why has landscaping not taken place. ie Trees on the main road. Bungalows in Geldof Drive. Why not use them as teaching units for the people ie gardening, woodwork, garden plots Community Centre to remain, needs to be updated. No more residential houses. Yeats Drive mound to remain the same. Resident (chairperson to represent the people of Cranmore. Neighbourhood centre but not a doctor.

Upgrade housing stock. Bigger Boxing Club for the environment. I also strongly oppose any new houses being build as all the tenants objected to years ago. I Strongly object to creating congestion, unsociable behaviour, noise pollution, diminishing house prices on my road (mostly privately owned) by building replqacement homes for the ones you already knocked down elsewhere deeming town, parks etc. we need the streets cleaned up, not more people to mess it up more than it already is. I live on one of the few quiet streets where residents get along and would like to keep it that way. (10 Geldof Drive) No more residential house - apartments. Leqave the centre at its location with Sean Fallon Park. Give funding to CTC - Youth Reach Mechanics course etc. Ce-op to be disolved after regeneration has left. Residents group to take over.

Fallon Pitch is moved it would be a loss of revenue to the Community Centre.

All access roads into Cranmore must have tonnage restrictions for trucks etc. Dubious of all the extra housing suggested.

Do not pull down houses in McDonnell Drive Son't pull down 4 houses in McDonnell Drive, Sligo I live in no 25 collery Drive. I would like a 2 bedroomed bungalow (not apartment). Would like a house near Cranmore.

Back boiler in house to keep costs down. Parking - more (community). Widen Devins Drive. Paint all houses. More trees. Boxing Club move, needs to be bigger. Youth Centre open every evening/all Summer.

I live in 26 Collery Drive. I would like to be beside my family in Garavogue Villas in a 2 bedroom bungalow Neighbourhood watch. Anti-social behaviour towards some elderly resident s in some areas, CCTV access. Possibly an emergency call box located to alert Guards, Ambulance or Fire. community. The quieter the better. What can start in the next 6-12 months eg fencing, foorpaths, demolition of 8.00 am to 10.00 pm.

No more housing in Central Block. Cul-de-sac in Langan Drive should be removed and give vehicular access to the link in Brown's Firld (No 17). This then will link up with Centre Block.

I think another option to venture is new bridge - Brown's Field - Langan Drive, Green area/(McNeill Drive) out to Cleveragh Road through Londis or direct to Pearse Road. Straight route less housing to disturb as Cairns Road won't work as a Secondary Road as funerals and race days cause massive parking problems that can't happen on a secondary Road. Use of a green area for allotments, giving training, self worth and maybe a wee veg shop so people can sell their ware to buy more stock and maintain.

Totally opposed to redevelopment of lands bening Geldof Drive. Worried about developments putting large scale housing estate in a small space.

Some fair ideas - More development on Social/economic/enterprise and sustainable energy. Scope for ??????????

Initiatives here. Keep central site as green area. No more houses.

These are general ideas that hit me as I went around: To put buildings on our green areas would be a retrograde step.

We need trees and other expressions of nature for our mental health. The general area is well catered for but not is that the wider area is well catered for in terms of quality green areas but according to this plan Cranmore is being deprived, nature impacts on us at every level. Thanks very much. (Rita McGarry, I'm ok with being quoted).

Clearing of mound in Collery Drive. Not cost effective - overly ambitious.

I do not agree on any links to each of the streets as they were there for years and only ever caused problems. All alleyways need closing. They give rise to unsocial behaviour.

Regeneration Project being nothing but an expensive talking shop lacking in outcomes.

That's all great opening up spaces for kids play areas, but as a mum of young children I am very award of dog fouling and tom cats urine.

You have done a great job laying out proposed ideas/developments. They all seem like good ideas. In general I think more housing private or social is a bad idea. We are at a stage now in Cranmore where we seem to have a managable number of residents. Introducing more people into that mix may tip Cranmore back into the days it is still reputable for. Anything that is built needs to be maintained and kept clean. Some facilities in Cranmore eg. play area at the centre can be untidy from time to time. There needs to be a tightening of controls of dogs in the area. Clear signs not allowing them into green/play areas.

The bank at Collery Drive, cut it down.

At the bottom of Cranmore don't build the house, like put a park or something. I would like the mood gone and put landscape. More shop around the park place. Do something with Doorly Park big green. Do something like a nice picnic around astro park. A zip it bick park. ByLouis Scott 34 Cranmore Place Age 12 Place for people to walk dog/animal rescur. No more houses in Cranmore Place. Open Green area for kids to play.

Bigger stuff in playground for kids over 8. Better youth centre open every day with lots of sport. Good idea to have adventure playground in Woods. Kieran McGarry Cranmore Place (child) Cranmore Place: football pitches and benches. And a park but not out my back garden and a bike park (age 11) Geoffrey Cox More areas for children to play. A proper youth centre. Adventure woodland park is a good idea. Kacey Nooney 16 Joe McDonnell Drive, age 11

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 112

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire over 130 comments were made A quicker turnaround of empty housing should be a priority and these dwellings must not be allowed to decay to such a bad state where they attract all sorts of bad elements (kids, rubbish, drugs etc). Maintenance and upkeep of all the frontage and gardent to all housing within the estate must be kept at a good standard. (windows, doors, especially have knock on effects where children grow up and think its all right to live in dirt unfortunately.

More areas for kids to spend their time. Getting a new pitch and give away John Fallon pitch. A new youth centre that is open all day with different stuff to do. An Astro turf pitch. Put houses not too big in bland spaces. Adventure centre in the woods. HAnna Scott, 34 Cranmore Place (child) Behind the co-operation a bike park/skate park. A youth centre that children can go to and just hang out and relax.

Good idea for an adventure centre in the woods. (Katie Mansworth 3 Devins Drive 13 yrs old.

I think all your ideas are fantastic and i hope all these goals are achieved.

We don't need any more social housing.

To avail of Community Wardens in disputes with other tenants and a committment to non-violence full stop.l A spelling competition for children in Cranmore with good prizes (Pardon my own spelling).

If new community centre is built i propose to use the existing building as a pool hall/gym for residents or make seating/ picnic area for parents who are taking kids to playground. No houses, no apartments, no road, not through Geldof If new community centre is built it would be nice to use current building for recreation. Make it a gym or pool hall to give people somewhere to go and something to do locally. Overall ideas for environmental/clean up are good but proposed route through my home prevents me from supporting the overall proposals. Our home was purchased for the size (4 beds) with land (corner house) because of no existing houses around or in front of us. I see no point in moving congestion from one area to another (namely mine) Lighting really important for any new roads/paths/trails. New white lights are good.

Please keep the bus routes. More sports equipment etc for people of all ages. Upgrade the houses they really need it. Think about putting people with disabilities and older people in one area where they would be a lot happier - than if there is big 2 and 3 storey houses around them. A wee cul-de-sac for them.

Kids are bored, need more clubs for all ages. More play parks and access to the football pitch. Loads of space but not able to get into it.

Alleyways need to be allocated to residents to give them bigger gardens if they want it.

open to all households both private and rented. re new access at McDonnell Drive. People are getting different versions of the idea. The plan shous walkway/cycle as a walk/cycle way in the interests of safety.

Overall the plan is very good but as stated it should include everyone. Social inclusion and opportunities should be available to everyone as part of a regeneration process. Also any new houses/accommodation that is built should be offered to those from Cranmore in need of new houses or those on the housing list who grew up in Cranmore and would like to return to the area.

No more houses to replace Abbeyquarter centre and no through road. I bought my house in quiet cul-de-sac and want to keep it that way.

I have ms - I bought my house on a cul-de-sac and thats the way I want it to remain. I do not want a road built and knocked through my road. Geldof Road is a quaint nice street and thats the way we want it kept. I do not want build a road through my quiet little drive by all means you can buy me out and let me more house. NO to your plans to build a road through Geldof Drive. Build it through Joe McDonnell Drive where it won't cause a bottle neck and headache. Stupid idea to ruin a lovely quiet area. I do not want my home devalued further due to ridiculous planning (Linda McManus) NO road through Geldof Drive. Bought my house in a quiet Cul-de-sac. I want it to stay that way - replace abbeyquarter with lovely green area with nice shrubs and maybe small fountain for parents to use when their children are in the park.

I am totally opposed to the opening up of Geldof Drive as a through road to Chapel Hill. We bought our house I am also totally opposed to replacing the Abbeyquarter Centre with new housing.l All this might seem a great idea to everybody else in Cranmore but not to the residents of Geldof Drive. I will be objecting strenuously to these plans when the time comes and I won't be an only voice.

I must say that I have found the exhibition interesting but confusing. It seems to be a collection of if's and but's with no clear end product. It may be just me but I thought it would have a clearer goal at this point. I would suggest that any accommodation for the elderly be done in an organised fashion as in the Nazareth House where it can be supervised on an ongoing basis otherwise it will be doomed to failure. Thank you.

I bought my house in Geldof Drive in a cul-de-sac to rear my kids in a quiet area. This area is the quietest area in Cranmore. Will never agree to the plan unless our house is bought back from us or moved to a quiet place. DO NOT

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 113

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire over 130 comments were made Doorly Park / Martin Savage Responses to page 8 of questionnaire Put yourselves in our shoes - look at what this is doing to Martin Savage/Doorly Park. We have a beautiful area and without some of the proposals you have. Bottom line: no more roads in our area, no more houses. It is so unfair and makes me so upset even thinking about this. Regeneration of Cranmore, great idea, thumbs up - but not at the expense of our area. Leave well enough alone now. Some ideas are great and I appreciate that a lot of work has gone into this but as stated above- put yourselves in our shoes when reading the proposals again. Please take my comments into consideration. already suggested on numerous occasions that this needs to be addressed. This is all about Cranmore - stop trying as well call Martin Savage/Doorly Park Cranmore too if you go ahead with these proposals.

As I am a resident of Martin Savage Terrace I would have liked to see Martin Savage Terrace mentioned at least once in this document. As usual our opinions don't seem to be taken serious or into consideration, perhaps we should call all this side of town Cranmore. I am outraged at the idea of having not one road but two opposite my front door taking our bank and beautiful trees away and excessively landscaping other areas. Just disgusted with all of this.

The ideas and opinions of the residents of Martin Savage Terrace appear to be totally irrelevant to this document. The occupants of properties no. 32 - 50 seem to be getting the s**t end of the stick in this whole project. Big ideas to landscape and make green areas and Martin Savage Terrace is to be robbed of its little bit of greenery trees and grass banking to be ripped out for a land that could be ?? at the back of the three houses opposite and on down to Doorly Park, Signed Disgusted Resident.

Apart from the title of the document Martin Savage Terrace and any of the disruptions to the residents are NOT mentioned anywhere.

I think the masterplan does nothing very much for Doorly Park, Martin Savage Terrace and River View. We have a lot of Senior Citizens in our area and what's in this development for them? I am referring to a suggestion of houses regenerated in other areas. Why can we not have the same in Doorly Park/Martin Savage/Riverview. We would love the library book van to come to our area. the trees in front of Doorly park are not high or need looking after, I would love to know why the plan is so dismissive of our area. Are we not entitled to the same amenities as other areas? We are just ignored all of the time. We would have good plans if the Lodge was looked after, the garden could be used

NOTHING TO DO WITH DOORLY PARK?

Other - Responses to page 8 of questionnaire The social & economic plans need to be looked at more closely. This is a regeneration area and a hugely disadvantaged area. Before employments & training needs can be looked at. More basic needs like pre training and pre employment and re-entering education need to be addressed. Huge numbers of early school leavers in this area and huge issues with literacy and numeracy skills. A lot have very little formal education and need to be taught how to approach basic education.

Very interesting Ideas, any new housing would need to be well managed with all necessary supports for tenants.

There needs to be a child friendly version of the masterplan.

Children are more lightly to respect what they have being involved in. There needs to me more opportunities for adults to participate in exercise. Child minding can be an issue. I would like to see a system where two or three parents could mind children while other parents take part in exercise. There could be a rota.

It is a pity that in the Community development and youth work section that the voice of children point is last on the list.

If I was a young person coming to this exhibition I might feel like young people were an afterthought.

Social plan boards have too much information on them.

Need more spacing, more user friendly, focused target audience.

It is supposed to engage residents.

I have a degree in Social Studies and I feel a bit overwhelmed. farm is a very good idea, also community vegetable gardens.

Urban

Key to Regeneration is to get ????? In from the wider communities in Sligo. As such the provision of public amenities for all of Sligo are important, as one providing opportunities for economic development for all. Best of Luck.

Would like to see the Abbey Quarter be deept for re development. As the residents has a lot of memories, and hard

will there be enough lights and cameras for security Think it is important, Mental facilities /Services exist in the area (new medical facility could provide this) but also innovative mental Health projects like through Youth Cafes / services giving young people opportunity to discuss mental health concerns in safe place. building, CV and interview skills etc.

Potential for Social

Young parents - potential at pregnancy stage to have Anti Natal classes etc., held in the area with add on around parenting /looking after yourself as a parent/support available/acknowledging potential for post natal issues/blues etc., Also breastfeeding support etc., etc.

Creates very positive image of potential of masterplan area

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 114

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire over 130 comments were made Re Social Plan - Key actions - all good - health and well being - supports to improve health, could be developing a community health for Cranmore - cross cutting theme, using all the new facilities - Doorly park/Lough Gill in local healthy life styles programme. Also support for community workers to deliver stress management/social prescribing in an area --

SLPC are developing Access Sligo - disability app - could be easily transferred to Regeneration Area. are individuals from congregated settings moving in to the area?

More Pedestrian crossings DSP/Lidl/Doorly Park Gaol - should be a tourist attraction - new Bridge - the sooner the better

together with greater accessibility to the hospital, IT and North Side of Sligo will mean better opportunities for jobs, educational access and ease of circulation from Cranmore and the east city area without having to deal with the city

I would say most of the plan is very good. If the residents are happy with it I would support. They must be on board for it to work.

Well done, thoughtful, productive and comprehensive.

Social inclusion is an integral part of community, developing and enhancing well-being and quality of life for all concerned.

This would be a good time to look at the place in the community of the residents and families in Globe House and how they can be best utilised within the area and included in the sharing of talents and skills in social and culture engagement projects.

It may also be worth assessing the feasibility of a hydro-power station on the Garavogue River.

Mercy School is privately owned.

Any work which would improve the ground /facility of the school should be at least co-funded by the school on a so-so basis, ideally entirely paid for by the school's patrons.

Finally, please use sligo - based consultants as much s possible.

Well done a great job.

To include the library and its resources in the literacy and educational vision, develop a partnership and working relationship within the community.

A lot to take in - in one go !1 The River and lake are a huge un tapped Asset application.

Gail McGibbon - Sligo BIDS I canâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;t see why more and better medical needs, if there be money available it should be given to Sligo General Hospital and bring back Oncology Unit.

1) Next phase need to identify timelines of responsibilities - key partnership needed to achieve the actions listed.

Drainage

networks,

SUDS

etc

-

Link

to

L.

Gill

SAC

of

wetlands

to

take

surface

water

etc.

I have ideas enlarging on my thoughts so far - can be contacted at 087-2610679 Regenerating the physical layout of the area on its own, will not improve education, unemployment and the high levels of dependency in this area. I believe that a working group should be formed to address these issues, so that there is a plan in place to try and solve the social challenges faced by the people of this area at the same time s the physical developments are taking place.

Thank you for the opportunity to offer my opinion in relation to this worthwhile venture. Signed: Jim Lawlor - Chairman of Sligo Tidy Towns Partnership Ltd, Seaview House, Sea Road, Sligo.

Stress for older people whilst work being carried out.

Houses unable to be sold and prices dropping with this uncertainty of what will happen in area. change to doctors at new facility.

Do not want any Social Housing built in this area.

Doorly Park/Martin Savage Residents will not use Cranmore facilities, and want their own facilities appropriate to age County Sligo Racecourse is currently drawing up a 10 Year development Plan at the Racecourse. We acknowledge the importance of our proposals for Development working successfully together with the overall Regeneration masterplan. It is important to note thta no developments proposed in the Regeneration Masterplan shall interfere with County Sligo Racecourses Business of Horseracing or encroach on the Area of their Leased Land.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 115

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Feedback and Comments from Questionnaire over 130 comments were made Tonaphuble - Responses to page 8 of questionnaire All in all, it looks great, and should really improve the area.

Compliments on good designs, great work, p.s. I also support the eastern bridge, makes sense and should have been done years ago.

How ? Start at the basics - food fuel. sustainable practice. The only limitation is our imagination.

Also, many towns and cities are implementing these already - Transition Towns etc., Itâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s a wonderful opportunity to create a world class sustainable community project. Well done on all work so far.

Garavogue - Responses to page 8 of questionnaire Would again like to see more commitment support for Garavogue area.

A lot of houses in Garavogue Villas have been left with very bad fencing since the recent refurbishment, this has led These fences are very costly as a lot of residents are elderly, single parents or widowed. We would appreciate if a suitable alternative could be put in place.

A lot of houses have been left in a very bad way. Some houses were already given new Fences which is absolutely disgraceful for some people to be given new fences and other people to fend for themselves.

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 116

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 117

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 118

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 119

Stage 3 - End of Stage Report

Sligo East City: Cranmore and Environs Regeneration Masterplan

Date issued: February 2015

Stage 3

Page 120