DC022513

Page 1

INSIDE

Start offers healthy fast food

PAGE 2

Men’s swimming wins C-USA

PAGE 5

Brown Bag dances series begins

PAGE 6

MilVets provide veteran support PAGE 4

MONDAY

FEBRUARY 25, 2013 monday High 61, Low 36 tuesday High 61, Low 32

VOLUME 98 ISSUE 62 FIRST COPY FREE, ADDITIONAL COPIES 50 CENTS

Shaq speaks about importance of humor omar majzoub Contributing Writer omajzoub@smu.edu Shaquille O’Neal has accomplished a lot in his lifetime. He spent 19 years in the NBA, won four championship rings and is considered one of the greatest players in league history. Off the court, O’Neal has released four music albums, appeared in numerous films and starred in his own reality television show. However, it’s O’Neal’s interest in academic humor that he enjoys talking about the most. “Humor is the Shaquille O’Neal brand,” O’Neal said at the Northeast Texas Humor Conference hosted in the SMU Owen Fine Arts Center. “I use humor to show people that, even though I have this monstrous frame and I’m a competitive animal, I’m still a normal person and a nice guy.” O’Neal is somewhat of a humor expert. After graduating from Louisiana State University and retiring from the NBA, O’Neal receivied an MBA from the University of Phoenix and finished his Doctor of Education at Barry University. O’Neal’s doctoral capstone project explored how CEOs and business leaders use humor in the workplace.

“I modulate 70/30. I’m 70% humorous and 30% serious,” O’Neal said. “But I have to be socially and ethically aware of how I deploy my humor.” O’Neal was joined at the Northeast Texas Humor Research Conference, titled “Humor in the Professions, Psychology, Philology: Intercultural Perspectives,” by Barry University professor David M. Kopp. O’Neal and Kopp shared their similar views on using humor as a leadership tool. “The best leaders use humor as a function of the situation,” said Kopp. “Humor is a performance driver based on if the follower is confident and willing.” O’Neal told insightful stories from his playing days that included joking around with coaches and players like Phil Jackson, Kobe Bryant and Yao Ming. He also explained about how he is always thrust into leadership roles, so he is constantly in the “CEO mindset.” He talked to the students about how different situations call for different leadership styles, but humor can always be used to help relieve stress. “Leaders have to make tough decisions whether to focus on

See SHAQ page 3

CHRISTOPHER SAUL/The Daily Campus

Basketball legend Shaquille O’Neal spoke to students Friday at the Northeast Texas Humor Conference held in the Owen Fine Arts Center.

rhetoric

admissions

SMU, TCU offer Early Decision to applicants JULIE FANCHER Assignments Desk Editor jfancher@smu.edu

ANDREW ARNDT/The Daily Campus

The historically black Wiley College debate team, famous for its 1935 defeat over USC, battled with SMU Wednesday.

Wiley wins debate with SMU Caleb Wossen Contributing Writer cwossen@smu.edu Wiley College debated against SMU Wednesday to eager response. Thirty people in the O’Donnell Auditorium sat in reverence as the teams waged rhetorical war on one another. Fuss and anecdotes bounced off the walls. Words flowed in suites of thick noise and hard data. Forget the topic – this debate was a test in showmanship. Both teams worked the crowd, but ultimately Wiley triumphed 20 to 13. However, SMU Director of Debate Dr. Ben Voth didn’t seem to mind. “I’m kind of one of the worst coaches in debate when it comes to the whole winning thing,” Voth said. “The first and most important win is that all participants and all observers imagine a world where we can tolerate different points of view.” It may seem odd for a coach to place free thinking over winning, but not when it comes to competing against Wiley. Wiley, a predominantly black

college, is famous for out-debating University of Southern California in 1935. News of a historically black college defeating a, at the time, historically white opponent inspired SMU to take a chance. Wiley was invited over for a debate that year. Despite the invitation, the moment where two private Methodist colleges overcame race and met as equals didn’t happen until 2009. Wiley’s success and influence are all due to the power of civil discourse. This remains true today despite evidence of the contrary. Debate has changed over the years. Today, YouTube videos inspire debate in the comments section. More often than not there are numerous verbal spats or trolling. These posts pay little attention to logic or grammar. This, more often than not, is the usual Internet debate. “We don’t fully appreciate [debate] today,” Voth said. “We’ve become a culture of amusement more than I’d like.” Wiley Director of Forensics Dr. Steve Medina places some of the blame on priority. College debate teams have

notoriously short shelf lives. Some see a debate team as inessential to academia. Students suffer the consequences when missing out on this invaluable skill, according to Medina. “Debate stimulates critical thinking and creates advocacy,” Medina said. “We change because of the ideas exchanged between people. If we lose the ability to exchange those ideas, change becomes stagnant.” However, rhetoric still plays its part improving the world. The revolutions in South Africa and the Middle East are the effect of good rhetoric, Wiley senior Ailey Pope said. “Young people were the ones who generated that change,” Pope said. “But they generated that change through the power of words, the power of debate.” The effect Wiley had on race relations speaks to the importance of good rhetorical skills. James L. Farmer Jr. was one of the members of the historic 1935 debate team. Farmer later adopted the role of the “hands and feet” of the Civil Rights Movement. “If you can’t argue,” Voth said. “You can’t build your dream.”

SMU and TCU will be adding new options to their respective applications beginning this fall. Students will now be able to select an Early Decision option, in addition to the Early Action option. Early Decision is an option used by universities nationwide. It is a binding application process that allows students to indicate that a certain university is their number one choice. “As both SMU and TCU rise in academic profile and selectivity, students are eager to demonstrate their commitment to attend,” SMU Dean of Undergraduate

Admission Wes Waggoner said. “These are very popular schools right now for high school seniors throughout the United States.” Students who choose to apply as Early Decision applicants are those who are prepared to make a contractual commitment to attend that university. The Early Decision option allows students to apply to only one school as a Early Decision commitment. Students who select the Early Decision option are guaranteed to hear back from the school no later than Jan. 1, in order to apply to other schools if necessary. Students at both universities will still have the option to

apply Early Action, which is non-binding. Early Action provides students with the university’s decision early in their senior year, but, unlike Early Decision, does not require an immediate commitment. SMU will also offer students the option of Early Decision II. This second-round option allows students to express their commitment to SMU later in the application process. SMU and TCU are not the first Texas schools to offer the Early Decision option. Rice University and Trinity University offer it as well. The entering classes of 2014 at SMU and TCU will be the first to have the chance to utilize the Early Decision option.

symposium

SMU strives to make education worth cost Andrew Hattersley Staff Writer ahattersley@smu.edu SMU professors and others from around the nation gathered at the Higher Ed Symposium Friday to discuss ways to improve the higher education system both at SMU and nationwide. Professors stressed the importance to uphold certain values and find new innovative ways to engage students. “We need to be able to justify such a high price tag for an institution,” Michael McLendon, associate dean and SMU professor, said. One of the areas McLendon emphasized as a good starting point was his own area. He urged SMU professors to do much more advocating of the values

we have at this school to make a difference. Dr. Marc Christensen, dean and department chair of the Lyle School of Engineering, also brought up the important issue of technology and how that can better a students education when used correctly. The key however, is this technology must not be used in a way that disrupts the students learning, according to Christensen. “The technology must be like a waiter or waitress at a fine restaurant: the water glass gets refilled and the plates get cleared, all without disrupting the engaging conversation,” Christensen said. “If the technology facilitates the engagement and does not distract from it then it

can be a useful part of the learning process.” The other key issue that came to the forefront was more of a disturbing trend. In the last portion of the symposium, Assistant Provost for Strategic Initiatives and Director of Student Retention Anthony Tillman shared some disturbing trends about diversity and urged teachers to take more of a leadership role in correcting this. Tillman recounted several anecdotes about students coming up to him with stories about how they were not treated in the same regard as the other students. “They reported that they have received disparaging comments from professors,” Tillman said.

See HIGHER ED page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.