After reading several of the articles from the Naturedebate on peer review, what do you think is the best way that articles in psychology should be selected for publication?
What are the key strengths of your suggested method? The weaknesses? When responding to your classmates, offer an alternative perspective to their suggestion or point out factors that they did not consider.
After reading the assigned articles on peer review as well as the chapters in the textbook on peer review, I believe the best way articles in psychology should be selected for publication isthrough peer review.
Doing the research on peer review has definitely shown me that there are ways the process could be improved upon, but that it is a pretty sound process for scientific research publication.
Just like anything is this world no article is flawless and the system
https://www.solvedcollegepapers.com/product/psy-510-psy510-psy-510-discw
https://www.solvedcollegepapers.com/product/psy-510-psy510-psy-510-acm
