Spring 2022 - Issue 11

Page 1

IN THIS ISSUE

STI Stigma

Students address stigma behind STI’s and the factors regarding discourse. PAGE 3.

4-in-a-Row

Carnegie Hall

SSU’s choir performs at the legendary Carnegie Hall on April 17. PAGE 5.

SSU’s baseball team continues their win streak with victory over CSULA. PAGE 7.

SINCE 1979

VOLUME 86 // ISSUE 11 APRIL 26 - MAY 20, 2022

THE UNIVERSITY’S STUDENT RUN NEWSPAPER

@SONOMASTATESTAR

SSU students victimized in new form of online sexual harassment RACHEL YETSO STAFF WRITER

L

ast month, one Sonoma State alumna and one student fell victim to the internet’s newest sexual harassment trend: “cum tributing.” This alarming trend has caused new concern to arise within the SSU community surrounding internet safety. Tributing is a form of online sexual harassment where predators screenshot a photo of their victim from their social media account, photoshop the photo to make the figures look nude, and send videos to their victims of themselves masturbating to the photo. The name comes from the harasser’s belief that doing this is a form of tributing their attraction to the victims In the case of the SSU students, an Instagram account under the name @jneqqtty took a photo off one of the victims’ public Instagram. They photoshopped the original picture to make the students appear nude, and sent it to them via Instagram direct message. After sending them the photo, they proceeded to send an array of

predatory messages and videos of multiple different men masturbating to the photoshopped image. The victims immediately recognized it was a photoshopped picture due to the background of the image, however, to an untrained eye the picture looks real. The private Instagram account is still active on the social media platform, following 55 other accounts. One SSU victim spoke to a criminal attorney, who stated that the case would not qualify as sexual harrasment. They explained that the case also would not qualify as criminal, only civil, as they would have no way to track down the owner of the private Instagram account. The attorney then explained that the crime itself would not be worthy of arrest and sent the victim on their way. As of now, federal and California state authorities have both criminal and civil laws for COURTESY // calstate.edu online sexual harassment. In criminal cases, onlineharassmentfieldmanual.pen.org states, “Law Academic Senate set to vote on no confidence resolution for President Judy Sakaki on Thursday, April 28.

see “TRIBUTING” on pg. 4

Sakaki faces vote of no confidence WILLOW ORNELLAS STAFF WRITER

A STAR // Holly Durfee Students from various organizations and groups around campus showed up to welcome incoming students on Seawolf Decision Day.

Seawolf Decision Day welcomes incoming students NOAH CLARKE STAFF WRITER

S

onoma State University opened its arms to potential incoming freshmen Saturday, April 23, for Seawolf Decision Day. The event, hosted by the university, acted as a campus open house to incoming freshmen. Undecided or not on choice of college, soon to be high school graduates had the opportunity to meet current students, faculty, and staff, as wel​​l as SSU alumni.

The event included sessions and presentations about various aspects of the school such as academic programs, student life, campus housing, and financial aid. A strong highlight of this event was the featured academic departments and their presentations. Many visitors attending got to explore options into different studies and learn about each program that SSU offers. Various programs such

see DECISION DAY on pg. 4

referendum vote of no confidence resolution regarding Sonoma State University President Judy Sakaki’s leadership is on the Academic Senate agenda for Thursday, April 28. The resolution requesting a Vote of No Confidence in President Sakaki’s leadership was drafted by a group of faculty from Social Sciences, Arts & Humanities, and Business & Economics and discussed in last week’s Executive Committee meeting with a Time Certain of 3:35 p.m. This meeting was described as a public forum and “open to all,” however, reporters from The STAR, the LA times, the Press Democrat and the KCBS SF Radio Station weren’t permitted access to join the “open forum” Zoom call until 54 minutes into the meeting when conversations surrounding the scandal, Title IX issues, the retaliation allegations and discussion about support for transparency had already concluded. A vote for turning the meeting into a closed session arose when the resolution was first brought forward according to Arts and Humanities Associate Professor, Talena Sanders who attended the meeting as one of the presenters of the vote of no confidence. The executive committee voted to keep the session open almost immediately. Sanders has been a part of the group that’s worked to draft the referendum vote of no confidence. She explained that a vote of no confidence in President Sakaki’s leadership is largely symbolic; it doesn’t carry any actual power with it. The vote is about expressing the faculty position and to strongly suggest, as a full faculty, that President, Sakaki resign. Ultimately, no one has to resign, no matter the outcome of the vote. In 2007, 73.4% of faculty voted no confidence in the referendum vote of no confidence for former SSU President, Ruben Arminana. While President see SAKAKI on pg. 4


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Spring 2022 - Issue 11 by Sonoma State STAR - Issuu