Volume74 issue3

Page 1

P. 7

Review: Father John Misty

P. 6

“Heroines” empowers women

P. 3

The power of dreams

Sonoma State Star SINCE 1979

FEBRUARY 10 - FEBRUARY 16, 2015

VOLUME 74 // ISSUE 3

SONOMASTATESTAR.COM

Sexual assault remains a national issue Kayla E. Galloway News Editor

O

ne in five college women in the United States will be victims of sexual assault and an estimated 12 percent of those victims will go on to report their attack to authorities according to the United States Department of Justice. Sexual assault on college campuses has been at the forefront of many media outlets in the U.S. in recent weeks, including a case concerning a former Stanford University student. Last week, it was announced a 19-year-old student would be charged with rape of an unconscious woman occurring on university grounds. This example of sexual assault on a college campus is one of many that occur each year. In September, Gov. Jerry Brown enacted the “Yes Means Yes” bill, which is intended to change the way college campuses in California address sexual assault as well as the victims. The bill requires California colleges, when investigating occurrences of sexual assault, to not accept intoxication, silence or lack of resis-

tance as a form of “yes”. Though this bill has received both positive and negative critique, the issue of how few sexual assaults are reported to authorities on college campuses still remains. “Sexual assaults are underreported everywhere. That is the reality of what we’re dealing with in life,” said Christine Castillo, executive director for Verity, an advocate and crisis line for victims of sexual assault based in Santa Rosa. “There is a stigma associated with reporting [sexual assault] because people tend to judge victims, especially on a college campus.” Laura Williams, director of clinical services and licensed psychologist for Counseling and Psychological Services at Sonoma State University, believes society should have respect for victims of sexual assault and their experience, rather than making judgment. “We need to listen to victim’s stories, have respect for their experiences, learn about their suffering and support their healing,” said Williams. Castillo believes sexual assault has a stigma in society and in turn See ASSAULTS on Pg. 5

University moves to part-time faculty majority Michelle Welling Staff Writer

W

hen the California State Un ive r sit y system faces budget cuts, educators pay the price with their jobs. The California State University system reported to have a majority of part-time faculty during the 2013-14 academic year. This shift of instructors has serious ramifications both in and out of the classroom, and holds several implications in regard to the institution of higher education in California. The first of these is the concern of accessibility. California state universities are supposed to be accessible institutions of higher education, but with more part-time faculty than full-time professors, they may not be so accessible after all. “Students have a far less likely chance of gaining access to

part-time teachers outside of class simply because these teachers only spend part of their day here,” said professor John. P. Sullins, chair of the philosophy department. “In many cases, they may teach at other institutions or have other part-time jobs they work at in addition to what they do for us here.” This brings up the concern regarding the quality of education offered at the CSU. Like students, California State University instructors are not considered to have full-time status unless they carry a workload of at least 12 units. However, when part-time professors must commute several times a week between, say San Francisco State University and Sonoma State University, transport becomes another element of the position for which faculty members must account. With this in mind,

one must wonder if an instructor takes on too much just to pay their bills; all projects will suffer under the strain. Additionally, it is important to recognize that “part time” and “full time” are not the only categories in which teaching professionals fall. Within full-time instructor positions are tenure track and non-tenure track professors. Professors may not be on the tenure track, but still maintain a certain amount of job security in their workload and contract. However, without the near absolute security tenure status offers, no instructor can really feel safe in their job. “They have to watch what they say in the classroom or in public since they can be fired much more easily, or at least just not hired again next semester,” said Sullins. See MAJORITY on Pg. 4

STAR // Connor Gibson Sonoma State University implemented a campus-wide smoking ban last week, which has received both positive and negative feedback from students and faculty.

Smoking ban receives mixed reaction Rissie Markarian Staff Writer

S

onoma State University will join more than 1,500 other universities nationwide to enforce a smoking ban throughout the entire campus on July 1. The policy took a transitional effect on Feb. 1 and smoking is currently only allowed in designated parking lots across campus. 
 Sonoma State began a gradual transition toward a smoke-free campus beginning in the 1980s and 1990s, when the university prohibited smoking in campus buildings, covered walkways and entryways. From there, several amendments were made to the smoking policy, bringing the university closer to a smoking ban across the entire campus taking effect earlier this month. Feb. 1 ushered in the first phase of Sonoma State’s campus-wide smoking ban. For now, there are still designated smoking areas on campus; however, July 1 will launch the official ban. The ban means that smoking and other uses of tobacco products will be prohibited on campus as well as at off-campus sites under university ownership or control, and in vehicles owned, leased, or rented by the university according

to Sonoma State’s smoking policy. 

 As a result of allowing people to smoke and use tobacco products on campus in the past, the university’s cleaning, maintenance, and repair costs rapidly increased. The purpose of the policy is to uphold its responsibility to help maintain the good health of students on campus and avoid mishaps or hazards potentially caused by smoking or smoking products. “Sonoma State has long felt we could do more to protect our students’ and
employees from second-hand smoke,” said Susan Kashack, chief communications officer. “The campus does not have a large population of smokers but enough so that a few years ago we banned smoking within 20 feet of any doorway, breezeway or other area where the campus community might walk through or occupy. Kashack believes the new policy takes the prior smoking policy one step further by prohibiting smoking throughout the entire campus, beginning July 1. Until then, smoking is allowed only in designated parking lots. “[The policy] reflects the concerted efforts and concerns of students, student groups such as the

Student Health Advisory Committee and the Associated Students as well as many Sonoma State employees over a number of years,” said Director of the Student Health Center Georgia Schwartz. “It reflects a sound public health approach and responsibility for the campus.” President Ruben Armiñana believes the smoking ban benefits the health of everyone on campus. “Science has been very clear about the dangers that smoking presents to smokers [as well as] non-smokers,” said Armiñana. Many students are very pleased to hear about the new smoking policy in addition to faculty. “I don’t like randomly walking into a cloud of smoke and feeling like I’m going to get lung cancer,” said Victoria Castellanos, sophomore biology major. “I like this change.” Sophomore and English major Katelynn Jasper said, “Personally, I think [the smoking-ban] is great. I enjoy my fresh air.” While some students may be happy about the smoking ban, many were also dismayed by the policy. “It’s kind of insulting that the university decided to prohibit smoking on campus,” said sophomore criminal justice major Daniel Havel. “Smoking is an

effective stress reliever for a lot of people and it also helps them focus.” The university anticipated some of the problems that have arised due to the ban and developed ways to come to the aid of those who may seek help during this time. Junior English major Nik Stelmashenko was made skeptical by the ban and said, “[The university] is just doing it for the money. The amount of people who smoke on campus is minuscule, so it really isn’t doing much.” To accommodate employees struggling with the ban, Human Resources and Environmental Health and Safety are able to assist and the Student Health Center and Counseling and Psychological Services are prepared to help students, should they experience major withdrawal symptoms as a result of this ban. “We are excited about becoming completely smoke-free on July 1 and look forward to providing as much education and smoking cessation support as we possibly can during the months leading up to that date,” said Tammy Kenber, chief human resources officer. For more information on the new smoking policy, visit sonoma.edu/uaffairs/ policies/smokingpolicy.htm.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Volume74 issue3 by Sonoma State STAR - Issuu