Volume 77 // Issue 2

Page 1

In this issue:

A&E: “Star Trek” celebrates 50 years. Pg. 7

Opinion: Pope Francis insults Transgender community. Pg. 3 Sports: Kapernick has the right to pass on national anthem. Pg.11

SINCE 1979

VOLUME 77 // ISSUE 2

Student Life: Spanish professor travels the world but made Sonoma State home. Pg. 9 AUGUST 30 - SEPTEMBER 5, 2016

THE UNIVERSITY’S STUDENT RUN NEWSPAPER

COURTESY // Shane Bickford Stevenson Hall has been the center of controversy in the midst of a trial. The trial has been postponed from its original July date to late October.

Credibility of asbestos testing questioned Sam Evans Staff Writer

S

tevenson Hall has been under investigation since May 2014, when former Sonoma State University employee Thomas Sargent filed a lawsuit against the school. Sargent, who worked for the Sonoma State University Environmental Health and Safety program, allegedly detected unsafe levels of asbestos dust in Stevenson Hall’s air ventilation system. The trial was originally scheduled to take place on July 29, but it has been postponed until late October. During an evidentiary hearing preceding the trial on Sept. 2, Prosecuting Attorney Dustin Collier made further accusations against the university, claiming the defendants intentionally interfered with the asbestos testing process. On Jan. 19, asbestos testing took place on campus by a firm called RHP Risk Management. In order to assure the testing would be representative of normal conditions, the court ordered a mandatory preservation period before the testing,

from Dec. 12, 2015 to Jan. 19. During the preservation period, any interference with the sites scheduled for testing was strictly prohibited. This included any cleaning or maintenance. According to a statement released by the university discussing testing results from Jan. 19, there was some detected settled asbestos dust. However, the Environmental Protection Agency air sampling data demonstrates that any detectable surface asbestos dust levels found in the building have not contributed to elevated levels of airborne asbestos. These test results were initially relieving news for the defendants. Collier has made new accusations suggesting the university intentionally manipulated the air ventilation system, called the HVAC, during the preservation period, so as to prevent the flow of contaminated air to the testing sites. The HVAC is a computerized system, which controls the heating, air conditioning and general air ventilation of Stevenson Hall on automatic self-regulated settings. During the evidentiary hearing on Sept. 2, Collier presented 15 registered

instances where the HVAC system’s automatic presets were manually overridden during the preservation period without any given explanation. The defendants responded to these accusations by explaining that 14 of the 15 system-overrides were merely preventative actions, taken in order to cancel previously scheduled maintenance. They continued by saying one of the registered instances happened due to a misunderstanding among the custodians for the building, but it was purely accidental. On top of the alleged HVAC manipulation, Collier brought up what he believed to be a suspiciously timed campus-wide electrical shutdown that happened on December 30, 2015. Although electrical shutdowns are routine procedures at Sonoma State, Collier pointed out that this particular shutdown was unusual due to the fact the entire campus was closed off for it. “I don’t know if this issue would actually be brought up during the main trial. It’s possible,” said member of the General Counsel’s office William Hsu,.” Something

the judge wants to hear about and decide if it affects the trial.” Susan Moulton, a professor at Sonoma State, gave a witness account of the shutdown where she claimed to see trucks equipped with large vacuums and people wearing HAZMAT suits surrounding Stevenson Hall. Collier theorized someone had used the electrical shutdown to orchestrate a secret cleaning of Stevenson Hall during the preservation period. In response to these claims, the defendants countered by pointing out the electrical shutdown had been scheduled far before any plans for asbestos testing had been made. In addition to this, they said the closing off of campus for electrical shutdowns happens fairly regularly. Finally, they questioned the credibility of Moulton’s witness account due to the fact she was observing everything from “over a football field away”. The closing arguments of the hearing were made on September 2, and Nancy C. Schaffer, the judge presiding over the hearing, has yet to make a decision either way on the case.

Bill seeks to improve graduation rates Samantha Oyler Staff Writer

J COURTESY // Eric Swalwell Congressmen Mike Thompson and Eric Swalwell engage in a discussion with Sonoma State’s campus community in an effort to better serve the needs of the people.

Future Forum gives millennials a voice

Braden Cartwright Staff Writer

R

epresentative Mike Thompson and Eric Swalwell, a Congressman from the East Bay, visited Sonoma State Thursday to engage in a conversation about the issues facing young Americans. The town hall style meeting was part of a listening tour called the Future Forum, which

Follow The STAR:

is a group of democratic members of Congress committed to listening to and standing up for the next generation of Americans, according to the Future Forum webpage. Eric Swalwell, the Future Forum chair, is the representative for California’s 15th district located in the East Bay. Mike Thompson’s congressional fifth district stretches across the North Bay and in-

@sonomastatestar

cludes Sonoma State University. Students at this university are his constituents. Many of the audience members came to listen to two government officials speak, but the U.S. congressman were more interested in hearing what the audience was concerned about. See FORUM on Pg. 4

@sonomastatestar

ust percent of California State University students graduate within four years. Senate Bill 412, the “California Promise” bill, is said to provide students with the tools they need to get through all their requirements in four years. Students placed in this program would receive special benefits catered to their requirements for graduation. The benefits include extra help from advisors and priority registration, all while fulfilling individual requirements provided by each campus and carrying a minimum of 30 units in an academic year. This bill was designed to change the statistic and decrease the achievement gap. In a unanimous effort to change the graduation rates, the state Assembly voted 39-0 in favor of the California Promise bill. First-generation students, low-income and community college graduates would be given priority to be in the program. “Many of our campuses continue to make big strides

/sonomastatestar

in closing the achievement gap,” said California State University Public Affairs Director Toni Molle. “There is more work to be done to meet the CSU’s Graduation Initiative 2025 goals, but we must ensure that campuses are able to direct resources to the programs that are most effective for their students.” With this bill, the Cal State system’s goal is to help students focus on their studies and less on the stress of not graduating. Although this bill seems to benefit students, some are still not satisfied with the way the California State University system is handing their graduation needs and requirements. “I personally don’t think that academic advisors and priority registration is the root cause of why people stay longer [in school],” said Jacqueline Brezinski, senior at Sonoma State University. “I think that it’s more of the fact that there are more students than classes offered or not enough classes to begin

See GRADUATION on Pg. 4

Visit: sonomastatestar.com


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.