In this issue:
Sports: Women’s golf places in top five at invitational. Pg. 11
Opinion: Proposition 60 an issue of public health. Pg.3 Student Life: OLLI offers no credit classes to adults wanting to expand knowledge. Pg. 9 A&E: Alumni comic book artists found love at Sonoma State. Pg. 6
SINCE 1979
VOLUME 77 // ISSUE 9
OCTOBER 25 - OCTOBER 31, 2016
THE UNIVERSITY’S STUDENT RUN NEWSPAPER
CSU considers $270 tuition increase Charlotte Grayson Staff Writer
A STAR // Jenna Qualls Supervisor David Rabbitt spoke with the STAR on Oct. 18. He said he hopes to see SMART special discounted fares for students.
Supervisor David Rabbitt discusses SMART delay and ballot measures Alexis Austin Staff Writer
D
avid Rabbitt, one of the five supervisors representing Sonoma County, met with the Sonoma State STAR on Tuesday to weigh in on issues concerning the county such as ballot measures and propositions. Rabbitt represents the southern part of Sonoma County, including the area around Sonoma State University. His district is composed of the entire city of Petaluma, Cotati and three precincts in Rohnert Park. Rabbitt is an architect by profession and practiced for 28 years before being elected to the Petaluma City Council. Rabbitt currently serves as the director of the Sonoma County Water Agency, commissioner on the California Seismic Safety Commission, appointed by Gov. Jerry Brown, and serves on the board of directors for Sonoma-Marin Area Regional Transit train and the Golden Gate Bridge. What follows is an edited transcript of that discussion. STAR: How long have you been involved in Sonoma County? Rabbitt: It’s been six years on Board of Supervisors and four years on Petaluma City Council. So 10 total elected years. Running for supervisor is a bit of a different gig from the council because it’s a much larger organization; we are the largest employer in the county with about 4,100 total employees, 27 different departments and $1.65 billion
budget. STAR: SMART is starting with 10 stations and then there are going to be a few added stations later in Windsor, Healdsburg and Cloverdale. Is that now pushed back because you have announced that SMART trains won’t be operating until the Spring? Rabbitt: What we call now “The initial operating system” is a truncated version of what was envisioned way back when it first went through. It was envisioned to be 71 miles and now it’s somewhere around 49 to Larkspur. That’s what we have the money for and will complete. The piece to Larkspur was added on after the fact. That was about a $40 million add-on, $20 million through the president’s budget. That was a good thing. That’ll get added in later, the piece further north is really not there yet. What’s not funded is to go all the way to Cloverdale. That has to be in a totally separate financial drive going forward. STAR: Why is the SMART train being delayed? Rabbitt: It’s a culmination of things.. As they work through the testing phase, the trains are going faster and each time they run. they have to go back and tweak the software. This was all anticipated. We are at the place we should be at this point in time. We also have some brake issues that they are working through.
See RABBITT on Pg. 5
McKibben encourages climate action before its too late Ronald Campos Staff Writer
A
s the effects of global warming run its course, the Earth we once knew has changed in fundamental ways that will never be the same, famed author, educator and environmentalist Bill McKibben told a Sonoma State University audience Oct. 18. Record high temperatures were set in 2014, only to be smashed by temperatures in 2015. Now those temperatures are being smashed by those of 2016, he said. Earth has begun reaching such extreme temperatures that less-developed countries like the Philippines, Ethiopia, Haiti and many more places, people have started to experience such extreme droughts, storm damage and rising sea levels that they are losing their home and livelihoods. “Ultimately, it is our fault because our daily life decisions contributed to leaving behind a greater carbon footprint and raising the temperature a little
Follow The STAR:
over one degrees celsius,” said McKibben, founder and leader of the international environmental organization 350.org. The organization was based on 2007 research that the safe upper limit of CO2 in the atmosphere to avoid a climate tipping point was 350 parts-per-million, ppm. It’s now at closer to 400 parts per million. The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is rising at about 2 ppm every year, he said. Meanwhile, as part of the 2009 Copenhagen accord, world leaders agree that 2 degrees celsius, or 3.6 degrees fahrenheit, was the limit that the world could tolerate in terms of temperature rise. To stay below that level, researchers have estimated that the planet can afford to dump another 565 gigatons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which, based on its currently accelerating rate, should occur by 2028. But, as McKibben points out, fossil-fuel companies have roughly 2,795 gigatons of carbon sitting in their coal, oil and gas reserves. That’s five times more carbon than world leaders have
@sonomastatestar
already acknowledged that the planet cannot handle. That is one of the reasons he and 350.org have supported protests against the Keystone XL Pipeline and the current Dakota Access Pipeline protest in North Dakota. The 1,172-mile Dakota pipeline would deliver fossil fuel from a vast underground oil deposits known as the Bakken Formation near the border of North Dakota and Canada to South Dakota, Iowa and Illinois. But the world can’t afford to store up or use any more oil deposits, McKibben said. “Unlike 25 years ago, we know what to do. Things like solar power we talked about with our fingers crossed. Engineers have done their job well, the price for solar panels have dropped 80 percent over eight years. This opens up a lot of possibilities for other countries to generate clean energy,” said McKibben. McKibben has authored a dozen books about the environment, including his landmark publication “The End of Nature” See CLIMATE on Pg. 4
@sonomastatestar
proposal released this month by California State University Chancellor Timothy White includes every college student’s least favorite words: A tuition increase. The chancellor is proposing an increase of $270 per student, an increase of 4.9 percent, to take effect during the 2017-18 school year. The tuition hike is needed for a number of reasons, the chancellor explained in a recently released 13-page document. For approximately 20 years, the number of students enrolled in the California State University system has increased, while state funding has decreased. Since the universities are funded by allocated tax revenue and tuition, when tax revenue goes down, tuition has to increase to ensure that the Cal State system can still operate, he said. “The CSU has two funding sources: the state general fund, provided by the state Legislature and governor, and systemwide tuition, paid by students and their families,” said California State University spokesperson Elizabeth Chapin. “Every year, the CSU requests adequate funding from the state as part of the budget cycle. As of right now, there is a $169 million gap between the CSU’s preliminary budget plan for 2017-18 and the state’s funding plan.” The CSU system only received the funding it requested for one of those years. Altogether, this means the CSU system did not receive more than $400 million that it needed and requested over the last four years. The $270-per-student increase was calculated to create more than $70 million in revenue for the university system. If the Board of Trustees approves the tuition increase at its January meeting, the increase would go into effect for the 2017-2018 school year. “If the state does not fund the gap, the CSU may need to consider difficult options including reducing programs and services or an increase in tuition,” Chapin said. The tuition increase proposal also includes a proposed budget for the year, which totals estimates of what the CSU system would spend on its expenses and how much revenue it would receive. According to the table that outlines all of the costs and income for the year, the CSU systemneeds to increase revenue by almost $170 million in order to
pay for all expenses. In many cases, however, the increased tuition costs may not even affect students. The tuition increase is promised to not affect financial aid, both on the state and federal level. According to the proposal, almost 80 percent of CSU students receive financial aid, and more than 60 percent of students have their tuition paid for entirely by financial aid. According to the proposal, the California State University system has three possible options to maintain their budget: receive more money from the state, increase tuition or reduce services offered. The first option is cited as the most ideal, but the state budget will not be finalized until June, leaving the CSU system uncertain as to how much funding it will receive until then. Conversely, the third option is least ideal because it would ultimately hinder students’ ability to graduate on time. “The first and highest priority to close the gap is to advocate in Sacramento for increased state funding,” said Chapin. “CSU leaders, students, and stakeholders will work with the governor and state legislative leaders to advocate for increased funding for the CSU to ensure that the university has the resources needed to continue to provide affordable, high-quality degrees to California students.” Individual CSU campuses will have to assess how the system-wide tuition increase will affect their school and students. “We are currently gathering input on the proposals, and students are encouraged to express their views through Associated Students,” said Nicolas Grizzle, news and information coordinator, before referring to the CSU system’s statement. Students are concerned about what an increase in their tuition will do to their financial state both now and in the future. “I transferred from Santa Rosa Junior College in the fall semester of 2015,” said senior communications major Kelsey Taylor. “After my two years at Sonoma, I will owe roughly $28,000 plus interest that has accumulated over time. With that sum of money hanging over my head, I am so grateful that I did not spend any more time at Sonoma State. That is not to say that I have not enjoyed my time at SSU, but I cannot even begin to imagine graduating with any more debt than I already have. This semester I am taking 19 units just to be absolutely sure that I can graduate in spring 2017.”
COURTESY // California State University The California State University system has not had a tuition increase since the 2012 - 2013 academic year. The Office of the Chancellor has proposed raising tuition from $5,472 to $5,742, a 4.9 percent increase.
/sonomastatestar
Visit: sonomastatestar.com