Voting opens April 3 Read bios, Q&A's and full ballot Page 5 Opinion: Staff writer Amira Dabbas gives her story of racism in America. Pg. 3
News: Associated Students elections underway Pg. 4 & 5
A&E: Stand-up comedian Dave Chappelle is back with more laughs. Pg. 6
SINCE 1979
VOLUME 78 // ISSUE 7
Sports: Women’s golf places top 10 in invitational match. Pg. 11 MARCH 28 - APRIL 3, 2017
THE UNIVERSITY’S STUDENT RUN NEWSPAPER
Decision reached in asbestos lawsuit; jury decides in favor of whistle-blower Sam Evans Staff Writer
T
STAR // Megan Corcoran Thomas Sargent and his attorney Dustin Collier speak to students at the Mario Savio Speaker Corner in May 2016. Sargent was awarded $387,895 after winning the verdict in a case regarding asbestos in Stevenson Hall at Sonoma State University.
he trial of Thomas Sargent versus the California State University Board of Trustees reached a verdict on March 15. Supporting the claims of the plaintiff, the jury found that Sargent’s peers pressured him to leave his job at Sonoma State University due to harassment after bringing attention to potentially dangerous levels of airborne asbestos in Stevenson Hall. Sargent was working for the Sonoma State University Environmental Health and Safety program when he noticed unsafe practices regarding the treatment of asbestos insulation in Stevenson Hall. After vocalizing his concerns about the asbestos, his colleagues pressured him into resigning by treating him with contempt, according to the lawsuit. In 2014, he filed a lawsuit against the school on the grounds that the school should have protected him from any retribution under the California Whistleblower Protection Act. The jury awarded Sargent $387,895 to compensate for his lost income and damages such as mental suffering and emotional distress. Despite Sargent’s concerns, an additional part of the jury’s verdict found conditions in Stevenson Hall “safe and healthful.” The school has conducted eight air-monitoring tests in Stevenson since March 8 of last year that confirms the finding. Asbestos was only detected in one of the 89 different samples that it took. And even then, it was only a negligible amount, according to California Occupational Safety and Health Administration established regulatory levels of asbestos.
Although the jury deemed the air in Stevenson Hall safe, it still called for the implementation of additional safety measures. President Judy K. Sakaki released a statement about the trial saying, “While the jury’s ‘safe and healthful’ finding is encouraging, the verdict also found that some past practices can be improved upon. We are reviewing those findings and are committed to taking additional appropriate proactive steps to ensure that Stevenson continues to be a safe and healthful workplace.” Her statement was unclear about past practices are, and how the school will be improving them. When asked to clarify this, among some other ambiguities in her statement, both Judy Sakaki and Associate Vice President William Kidder did not respond. The Press Democrat, however, was able to find some more information regarding the matter. There were 16 different Occupational Safety and Health Administration claims in the lawsuit. Of those 16, the jury justified seven of them, according to The Press Democrat. This includes a lack of maintenance for asbestos-containing floor tiles, a lack of proper dusting in many different areas in the building and a lack of the cleaning and maintenance of the building’s ventilation system. While the outcome will be relieving to some, it may also raise questions and concern about the efficacy of the janitorial procedures that are in place in Stevenson. In addition to the threat of the asbestos itself, there also looms the threat of discrimination against whistleblowers in the workplace.
CSU Board of Trustees approves $270 tuition increase STAR // Jade Eriksson Prospective students of Sonoma State University checked in at the Latino Family Summit held in the Student Center on Saturday. Lambda Theta Nu and Nu Alpha Kappa organized the event.
Latino Family Summit entices future SSU students Tyler Heberle Staff Writer
R
ecently immigrated Latino parents and their high school children saw the plethora of Sonoma State University’s academic opportunities during the 2017 Latino Family Summit. These parents and children attended the summit on Saturday in the Student Center. The summit presented topics ranging from counseling services to the Dream.US scholarship program to help Latino families better understand the American education system, ac-
Follow The STAR:
cording to coordinator of college readiness programs Magali Telles. “The whole point is, ‘What are the different pathways to college?’” Telles said. “But more importantly, for this community that doesn’t see a lot of representation at their own high schools… we’re giving them an opportunity to see Latinos closer to their peer group.” In an introductory speech, President Judy K. Sakaki stressed that attending college is possible, affordable, and that a university is a place where all students can be successful at.
See SUMMIT on Pg. 4
@sonomastatestar
@sonomastatestar
O
Nathan Jew Staff Writer
n a narrow vote of 11-8, the Board of Trustees for the California State University system has approved a $270 tuition increase, the first since 2011. The increase takes effect this fall and could generate up to $77.5 million of net revenue. The Cal State system will set aside a third for financial aide and use the rest to fund a CSU graduation initiative; a push to double four-year graduation rates within the CSU system and eliminate equity gaps for underserved and lowincome students. Assembly members, faculty and students had mixed reactions to the tuition increase since its proposal last September. Many are concerned that the California State University system is not doing enough to support its students and commit to education. Massive student protests were held on the day of the decision. Assemblywoman Sharon QuirkSilva has introduced Assembly Bill 393, a bill that would freeze tuition until the 2019-2020 academic year. “It is my belief
/sonomastatestar
that funding our systems of higher education should not be done on the backs of students and their families,” QuirkSilva wrote in a letter to the CSU Board of Trustees. “For this reason, we strongly oppose this tuition increase which would continue to put a burden on low-income and middle-class families.” Sonoma State University Associated Student President Emily Hinton said that she opposed the tuition increase and supports AB393. “Our team will be making trips to meet with our local representatives to lobby on behalf of bills like AB393,” Hinton said. “In May we will be at the capitol lobbying for the May budget revise to include changes that will help improve student life.” Hinton said students can get involved by going to the Student Activities Office and filling out postcards to send to Governor Brown. “We will also be collecting student testimonials for a video campaign that will demonstrate how the tuition increase affects student life,” she said. See TUITION on Pg. 4
Visit: sonomastatestar.com