HOUSING
In addition, the demand for legal aid services for civil issues like eviction in this country far outpaces the supply—the Legal Services Corporation’s most recent “Justice Gap” Report found that “[Seventyone percent] of low-income Americans experience at least one civil legal problem per year, yet [eighty-six percent] of them receive either minimal or no legal help to deal with it.” According to the Lawyer’s Committee for Better Housing (LCBH), in Chicago between 2010 and 2017, seventynine percent of landlords had attorneys in eviction court, while only eleven percent of tenants did. There was an average of 23,000 cases filed per year, and tenant access to counsel made a significant difference—by having an attorney, tenants decreased their chances of getting an eviction order by almost twentyfive percent. Consequently, LCBH and other tenant advocates and elected officials are pushing for Illinois and Chicago to implement a “Right to Counsel” for tenants in eviction court.
S
tacey—who preferred not to share her real name for fear of retaliation during or after ongoing negotiations with her landlord—said that "I'm a tough person and I will research the law to figure out what my rights are, but a lot of people are not gonna do that. So I actually saw people with bags leaving in the middle of the evening, so some of those conversations [with landlords] probably didn't go too well because people probably don't know what their rights are. People were pressured to leave." "One tenant [was] leaving with her kids, I felt really bad. I almost wanted to say to her well you don't have to do that, you need to get a lawyer and try to get some help, but I think some people just don't know. So when you have management walking around knocking on doors saying 'Hey can you leave?' People feel uncomfortable and they feel pressured.… You’re not supposed to do that. There were actually some landlords saying 'Hey we're gonna waive April/May [rent] and we know what everyone is dealing with.' Cagan was the exact opposite." While Stacey did fall behind on rent, she fortunately was able to remain in her apartment while negotiating with her landlord, Cagan Management, after she contacted MTO and was helped by Ruiz. But she only found out about MTO by
calling 311 after figuring out that Cagan had illegally disconnected her electricity in May, after months of texts and apartment visits from Cagan employees pressuring her to pay up or move out. Stacey was also one of the 78,000 Chicago renters who were denied relief in the city’s completely inadequate housing grant lottery program. But Stacey was fortunate that while she fell behind on rent and lost income due to the coronavirus pandemic, she was able to replace some income relatively quickly through the state’s unemployment insurance system—which was overwhelmed with record claims numbers—and now the federal expanded unemployment insurance program has expired. While the continued extension of the eviction moratorium is urgently necessary, without further tenant protections like the Just Cause eviction ordinance or State Representative Delia Ramirez’s rent cancellation bill, many thousands more people will be forced from their homes whenever the eviction moratorium expires. While it is important for tenants to have adequate moving time if they choose to move out, the recently-passed fair notice ordinance is wholly inadequate to the crisis at hand, much like the voluntary and unenforceable “housing solidarity pledge.” Mayor Lightfoot’s non-binding version of Just Cause will not prevent people from being displaced. Even before the current pandemic, the housing crisis in Chicago required at the very least the implementation of rent control and the construction of thousands of units of social housing. The city currently has a deficit of around 182,000 affordable housing units according to KenwoodOakland Community Organization (KOCO) executive director Jawanza Malone in a recent interview with the Weekly. Further, because coronavirus cases are once again rising in Illinois, it is now even more imperative that we ensure that all Chicagoans have a safe place to stay. The effects of a surge in evictions, like the effects of another surge in coronavirus cases, would all but certainly be disproportionately felt by Black and brown Chicagoans. Much more must be done to prevent that from happening. ¬ Bobby Vanecko is a contributor to the Weekly. He is a law student at Loyola University Chicago. He last wrote about his conversation with police torture survivor Mark Clements.
The Museum of the Future
The National Public Housing Museum listens and gives back during COVID-19 BY CARLOS BALLESTEROS
S
oon after graduating from Al Raby High School in East Garfield Park, twenty-four-year-old Shakira Johnson started working as an office coordinator at the National Public Housing Museum. Her duties mostly consisted of answering phones, scheduling meetings, processing donations, and giving the occasional tour. As a lifelong public housing resident, Johnson was eager to join the museum. She wanted to get her foot in the door so she could someday tell her own story. “What people know about public housing isn’t always great. I wanted to show how living in public housing was being part of a community, a family,” she said. Johnson soon figured out that the best way of telling her story was to help others share their own. Three years ago, she became an oral historian for the museum, tasked with building up its online archive of interviews with current and former public housing residents. “Learning more about what it means to truly listen to someone as they shared their story, I realized how important it was to preserve these histories,” she said. COVID-19 has turned Johnson’s job on its head. Instead of interviewing people face to face, she’s now mailing out voice recorders with a list of questions. But the pandemic has also opened up other ways for the museum to listen and give back, like handing out free face masks and groceries to public housing residents in Oakwood, Cabrini-Green, and to Johnson’s neighbors at the Westhaven Park Apartments on the Near West Side. “We don’t want people to just give us their story and have us forget about them,” she said. As museums across Illinois scramble to stay afloat—especially those that depend on entrance fees to keep the lights on—
the National Public Housing Museum has leveraged its nimbleness to directly aid those whose stories it wishes to preserve, reinforcing its vision for what museums should look like in a post-pandemic world. “The pandemic has heightened efforts to decolonize museums, to ask critical questions about who are the community members that museums are responsible to and for, even if they can’t buy a ticket to get in,” said museum executive director Lisa Yun Lee. Like any business dependent on groups gathering indoors, the pandemic has upended museums across Illinois. Between March and May, museums laid off or furloughed 183 staff and lost $14 million in revenue, according to a survey of twenty-six museums in the state by the Arts Alliance of Illinois. Those museums projected cutting another ninety-three jobs and losing $13 million more in revenue by the end of June. The state allowed museums to reopen earlier this month at twenty-five percent capacity, but some have chosen to remain closed, including the Adler Planetarium, which laid off 120 employees in May so that it could “survive,” according to a statement released at the time. Reasons cited in news reports by museum executives for the prolonged closures and layoffs revolve mostly around high overhead costs and figuring out how to adhere to social distancing protocols. The National Public Housing Museum doesn’t have either problem. The museum recently secured a $47,000 loan through the Paycheck Protection Program, which allows it to keep paying its nine staff members and six interns through the end of the year. “We made an early commitment that we wouldn’t let anybody go,” Lee said. AUGUST 19, 2020 ¬ SOUTH SIDE WEEKLY 7
